Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Game 63 Recap: Blazers 120, Knicks 114

Boxscore

As soon as they announced that Jamaal Crawford and Eddy Curry would be out of the game along with our old friend Zach Randolph I knew one of my game preview bullet points was going to be dead wrong.  The final assertion I made was that it was guaranteed we'd want the game more than the Knicks.  That's very much true of their normal roster.  That's not true of anybody's bench unit when they get the chance to start.  All of those guys have chips on their shoulders.  All of them want to play.  Having Zach out was one thing...I was fine with that.  But the full pre-game injury announcement caused me to let out a quick, "Uh oh...this may not go as planned."

However my second thought right after, "Uh oh" was, "If there's ever a night to make it all about the offense, this is it.  Even with the energy the Knicks are going to have to come up with an extraordinary effort to score enough points."

It was an "Uh oh", they did get extraordinary effort, and they had no problem scoring.  This is the reason the NBA can be great to watch even when neither team playing is at the top of the standings.  You never know exactly what you're going to see and sometimes you see the spectacular.  (Witness a couple of those Nate Robinson drives tonight.)

As a quick aside, I am curious to know if New York Knicks fans would prefer to field this lineup for the short term rather than the bloated, overpaid, selfish, directionless mess they started the season with.  Consider that Stephon Marbury was out along with Crawford, Randolph, and Curry and you had the top four players from the season's advent missing tonight.  And this is one of their better efforts of the year.  I know they would not win with consistency with this squad, but how many are they winning now?  Would you prefer to see this kind of effort with a few more guaranteed losses rather than the usual Knick output and a slot-jockey's chance of maybe picking up a few extra wins?  If so, welcome to Step One of the Portland Trail Blazers Rejuvenation Plan.  Win or lose, the whole league might be better off if you take it, bite the bullet through steps 2-4, and then enjoy your upswing in a few years.

As far as the game goes, our offense--to borrow a phrase from the immortal Paris Hilton--was HOT at the beginning of each half.  We were stroking it like we had never missed in our lives.  We did an excellent job finding the open man.  We did not do an excellent job driving the ball at any time during regulation though.  The Knicks had NOBODY inside to stop us and yet the vast majority of our paint attempts came from Lamarcus in the post, isolated.  Yes, the jumpers were successful for at least half of the game but this contest was just begging to be taken and we could never get our hands on it.  Our failure to penetrate was one of the main reasons.

The other main reason also had to do with our wing players, and it was defense.  Nobody stuck to a man out there.  We exposed our interior defenders like they were politicians in a public restroom.  We were VERY fortunate Joel and Lamarcus did not foul out.  Props to those two for keeping their heads in the game while still being able to defend.  The Knick guards had no qualms about driving in addition to hoisting long ones and they made mincemeat out of us.  Had New York had even a skosh more scoring in the frontcourt we would have lost this game.

The overtime turned everything around, basically thanks to Brandon Roy.  It looked like he said, "Enough of this crap."  He drove it into the teeth of the New York defense and converted time after time.  The Knick guards still scored, but they missed also.  Brandon didn't.  Big-time players always make O.T. their own and Brandon did it tonight.  In the end they had no star to match.

Other commendable mentions:

--We destroyed them on the boards, particularly at the offensive end.  We got up 95 possessions to their 89 and had 52 rebounds to their 41.  17 of those rebounds were at our end.  Bravo to all our big men.

--We did not turn the ball over much, which was a very good idea.  New York was getting enough cheap points as it was.

--We got our all-important "extra" points by shooting well from the three-point line and the foul line both.  This makes us much more of a threat.  As it turned out we needed every single one of those bonuses tonight.

Individual Notes

--Did I mention that we lose this game without Brandon in overtime?  I did?  Oh good.  That more or less makes up for a little bit of coasting from him in regulation.  But honestly, that probably had as much to do with everyone else running so well as it did with any desire of his.  Tonight was a night he probably should have saved up a little.  27 points and 6 rebounds were his final totals.

--Lamarcus had it working up until the end of the game, when he faded a little.  It was another strong effort with a couple of good signs though.  First he worked hard defensively.  Had he not coupled with Joel to watch the interior we would have been posted, toasted, roasted, broasted, and most-host-boast-`til-you-get-ghosted into oblivion.   Second he got some rebounds again.  5 of his 10 were offensive, which ended up being necessary.  5 defensive rebounds is not bad.  Third he shot 9 free throws, which shows his offensive game bothered some people.  Fourth he shot 50% and scored 22.   And finally he frosted the cake with 4 assists (second on the team) and 2 blocks.  Good work.

--Martell was a naughty, naughty boy early on.  His three-point shooting was making the Knicks cry.  Even when he stopped firing he still worked pretty hard...though he was among the defenders who got used like a casino ATM.  He had 7 rebounds though.  Nice.

--What has gotten into Steve Blake?  He's been really aggressive on offense the last couple of weeks!  He only shot 5-13 tonight but he scored 15 and dished 10 assists.  He will also be the third-most-watched figure on YouTube tomorrow, courtesy of guarding Nate Robinson for much of his 45-point outburst.  Darn that Jessica Simpson and those flatulent elephants anyway!

--Joel had 11 rebounds.  For the third time in six column inches we'll mention how much his defense meant to us tonight.  He's been a bright star in our constellation the last 10 days.

--Jarrett Jack shot 4-8 and scored 13, which was not bad.  He also hit some clutch free-throws for us late.  He turned the ball over twice, which probably should have been marked three times really.  His final one on a wounded-duck post pass to Roy got him yanked and had him quite literally kicking his chair as he went to the bench.  Fortunately they got the camera off of him and it wasn't on his lips as he did so.  Also fortunately he got a chance to redeem himself with those charity tosses.  That and the win will go a long way towards restoring confidence.

--Channing Frye punished his old team a little, even hitting a turn-around move in the post!  He looked driven tonight.  I like it better when he walks with a chip on his shoulder, as his game, like his personality, is a little easy-going.  8 points and 7 rebounds in 19 minutes ain't bad.  He collected 4 fouls again though.  I will say this...he is taking some hard fouls on opposing drivers that the rest of our team shies away from taking.  He seems to be of the mindset that if you drive he's going to knock you down.  I kind of like the sentiment.  Unfortunately he can't really intimidate anyone out of the paint.  Also I don't want him to develop a reputation as a hack artist.  I'd rather have him defend a little better.  (Again our guards also need to keep people out of the middle more.  Stay in front of somebody!)

--James Jones hit a couple of threes and missed a potentially game-deciding free-throw.  So-so night for him.  I still love that he's back.  He's an instant floor-opener.

--Travis had another sub-par night, shooting 2-10 for 6 points and making a ripple in the stat line comparable to that last eighth of a potato chip at the bottom of the bag.  You've heard how the league catches up with you quickly?  Every time Travis catches now the opponent knows an isolation set is coming and they're 75% sure he's going to shoot it.  Hello alert (and probably collapsing) defense.  Bye-bye dribble-jumper opportunities.  Back to the drawing board.

One-Sentence Game Summary:

Hey Blazers:  you're all in your early twenties so why are you driving like you're 83...a.k.a. slow and scared?

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Knicks Lineup
I am not convinced that having the Knicks play their young players would result in fewer wins than they would get with the overpaid losers that they normally have starting.  All of those players have areas that they excel in, but they also all have deep flaws that balance out any benefits that they may bring.  

Eddie Curry seems to be the worst of the bunch: The Knicks average having a net negative 15.5 points per 100 possessions when he is on the floor, and a net positive 0.3 points when he is not.  While it can be difficult to get an accurate measurement of a player's skill level using +/- statistics alone, that net 15.8 point drop when Curry is on the court is much to large to be caused by chance alone.  In fact, of all the players in the NBA who have received significant amounts of playing time, Curry ranks dead last in net point differential per 100 possessions.  He is arguably the worst player in the NBA.

by trk on Mar 9, 2008 1:51 AM PST reply actions  

This assumes
that you have a reasonable mind like KP at the helm.  With Isaiah Thomas you might end up with the Duke Lacrosse team.

by FrederickT1 on Mar 9, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Which
would still be an upgrade.
Wishing we'd play with Ruben Patterson-like abandon is like asking the chess club to smash beer cans on their heads. - Dave

by jamon51 on Mar 9, 2008 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

For the first time since the streak
I felt confident we would pull this out.
Maybe because Mortimer said he'd get a bigger than life-sized tattoo of himself on himself and Tom said he'd never drink beer again if the Knicks won.
And Tom strikes me as the type who's really fond of beer.

by Section323 on Mar 9, 2008 3:41 AM PST reply actions  

Ben Franklin said
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." I think Mr. inHawaii is a Ben Franklin scholar. I applaud him. Too bad (so my informants tell me) there is no good, local beer on the islands. Hopefully poor Tom isn't having to rough it in Hawaii. Maybe we should take up a collection.

by annthefan on Mar 9, 2008 5:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Beer is good for you too.
"The roots and herbes beaten and put into new ale or beer and daily drunk, cleareth, strengtheneth and quickeneth the sight of the eyes." -Nicholas Culpeper

by annthefan on Mar 9, 2008 5:21 AM PST up reply actions  

We have Kona Brewery
http://www.konabrewingco.com/ourpubs/kokomarinapub

and

Gordon Biersch

http://www.gordonbiersch.com/restaurants/index.php?pg=location&sub=loc&location_id=13

Kona is good but Gordon Biersch is just crappy flavored pilseners.

I love beer though.  Probably in my top 3 of things I love.

That was so fetch!

by tominhawaii on Mar 10, 2008 3:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

There was more than once
that I found myself wondering why Nate didn't change up his lineup, sticking Roy on Robinson.  I would think that

a) Nate has less of a quickness advantage on Brandon

and

b) Brandon is probably more familiar with Nate's game.

The last is an advantage, as you know what your opponent is likely to want to do and can anticipate.

Blake would have been fine guarding Freddie Jones and even Richardson, as he's shown he can handle D against a bigger opponent.

From my perspective, shut down Robinson and the game never gets to OT.

This is not a criticism of McMillan.  More of a question to elicite comment on the holes in my reasoning.

by timg56 on Mar 9, 2008 9:08 AM PST reply actions  

That seemed like a fairly decent idea
to me at the time also. Roy on Nate, that is.
lickety-brindle

by Billy Ray Bates on Mar 9, 2008 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Love the Recap...
almost as much fun as watching the Overtime portion of the game. I wish that I could have participated in the Gameday Thread but I was not home until the OT part of the game.

I particularly enjoyed your LMA comments in this recap: "Had he not coupled with Joel to watch the interior we would have been posted, toasted, roasted, broasted, and most-host-boast-`til-you-get-ghosted into oblivion.".

How do you come up with this stuff? Amazing!

35:12 Min, 14-20 FG, 1-2 FT, +15 +/-, 1 Off, 6 Rebs, 4 Ast, 1 Blk, 29 Pts - LMA vs. Bucks

by LaMarvelous on Mar 9, 2008 10:42 AM PDT reply actions  

I just wanna talk about
what a fool Nate Robinson is.

Here he is having the best game of his life, and he's to busy screaming at the top of his lungs and throwing up hand signs to the camera in timeouts with under a minute to go. Stop being such a fool and play some basketball. That kid is incredibly immature. Just remember that Knicks/Nuggets fight, Nate was a big time reason for that thing escalading.

Formerly known as Junit3123

by Jason3123 on Mar 9, 2008 2:24 PM PDT reply actions  

for some reason
I feel real confident in close games now.. I really like this team.. and im still thinking that we have point guards who can get the job done..with the off season these guys are pros they know what they have to do.. sergios in the dog house he has the world championships to gain experience, jarret is the consumate pro..he will work hard this summer, and you know blake will be in the practice gym the day after the season is over.. the finnish guy has no shot to make this roster oh yea the i forgot about the cat from denver :O) will be alright. I just dont think we need a 20/10 pg..more like 10/10  and with seasoning its already on the roster..so when rudy comes does brandon shift to the 1 anyway??
if it can be conceived it can be achieved

by lyfefindsaway on Mar 9, 2008 3:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Nice signature
And if it can be conceived and achieved it can be complained about.

--Dave

by Dave on Mar 9, 2008 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good recap
Lots of good signature material in this recap.

"We were stroking it like we had never missed in our lives."

"Our failure to penetrate was one of the main reasons."

"Martell was a naughty, naughty boy early on."

That was so fetch!

by tominhawaii on Mar 10, 2008 3:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm