Game 72 Recap: Blazers 102, Wizards 82
OK...so last night everybody's taking the sheets off of their beds and dejectedly tying them into nooses. Now tonight everybody unties the nooses and turns them into togas for a big party. Welcome to life with the third-youngest team in the history of the NBA.
This effort was as impressive as any we've seen all season, and we've seen some nice ones. I'm not sure the odds could have been stacked any farther against us. First Lamarcus has to sit out with his ankle problem. Then on the final play of the first quarter Brandon Roy collapses to the ground, straining his groin, and is basically done for the night. (One good thing that came out of this was that in the Gameday Thread our own AnntheFan proclaimed herself an expert on pulling groins...whatever that means. You learn something new every day.) So, setting the scene...no first round star center (as has been true all season), no high-scoring power forward, no All-Star guard. All three of the Big Three are down. We have zero post presence, nobody with any more consistency than Joel Przybilla and Steve Blake, and nobody left in the game who has averaged more than 13 points this season. Somebody sound taps, right?
Wrong. We ended up winning three of four quarters in this game and tying that fourth one. We shot 49% to their 36%. We got 17 offensive rebounds (that's about 2 games' worth) and obliterated them on the glass 55-36. We had 28 assists on 39 made buckets and 10 blocked shots. We were the stiletto heel and they were the grape. (Two snaps up.)
This makes, what? Our fourth blow-out of the season? I kind of like how they feel. And they're a lot easier on the blood pressure.
Of course we had any number of individual efforts contributing, but the most impressive thing to me was that it was never a one-man show out there. We won this game running our offense, playing smart, sharing the ball, covering for each other, and working hard. This wasn't a "dump to Travis and watch" game, though instinctively it should have been. In fact Travis had 5 assists. That shows you what kind of night it was. It's not like the Wizards are winning Defender of the Year trophies, but we've made bad defensive teams look pretty good before. Like, say...LAST NIGHT. Tonight we played with confidence instead of consternation, hustle instead of hubris, with pride, poise, passion, and panache instead of pathetic, pedestrian, passive, ponderous, pique-producing, perniciously pre-pedagogical paralysis.
Two things struck me about this game: how well we were prepared and how well we adjusted. Knowing we didn't have Lamarcus to anchor the post we started the game by taking advantage of what Travis could to at the power forward position: cut and move. The fluid, passing offense made his into an immediate asset instead of a liability. It was smart not to just force him into Lamarcus' plays. Second when Roy went down we started concentrating on down screens, curls, and transition plays, all of which favored our remaining personnel. We're going to talk about the players in a second but we shouldn't gloss over the fact that this game was well-planned and well-coached from the opening tip. We got a ton of mileage out of our players and possessions tonight.
Individual Observations
--It's not an accident that Jarrett Jack got the victory horn camera shot and the post-game interview tonight. This was probably the best game we've seen from him all season. When Roy went down, he stepped up. His energy level doubled and he started setting guys up in places they could score. He grabbed a couple of rebounds in that second quarter as well. Then towards the end of the period he started driving and scoring...a trend he would continue through the second half. There wasn't a second of confusion after we lost our star and nobody stood around staring, wondering who was going to lead. Jarrett just stepped up and did it. And he did well. His final line was 17 points on 7-10 shooting, 5 rebounds, 6 assists, and 2 steals. That's pretty close to a Brandon night, which was exactly what we needed.
--With apologies to the great Buster Poindexter, Martell Webster was feeling Hot Hot Hot tonight. He led the team with 23 points and most of those were jump shots...some that stretched the limits of credulity. When a guy takes a side dribble, leans, fires from 21 feet and finds the bottom of the net he is ON. Martell was 9-14, 4-6 from distance, and played 37 minutes while looking like he belonged there. One of the big questions when Roy went down was where our scoring would come from. Martell quashed that query immediately. Bravo, sir!
--Travis Outlaw was the other big scorer with 20 on 8-16 shooting. He looked more relaxed and played within himself and the offense tonight. You didn't see as many of those six-dribble, turn-around, pressured jumpers. He cut smart, caught the ball where he could score, and made the Wizards pay for their defense. He also had 6 rebounds and 5 assists. We didn't get killed on the boards entirely when he was in! Travis has had more noticeable games--ones that left you shaking your head in awe--but this was one of his most professional games.
--Joel Przybilla MURDERED the Wizards on the glass. He was the main reason they never made a credible run. They were never sure they could get a rebound and thus never got the chance for easy buckets. He had an incredible 8 offensive rebounds and 17 overall. To put that 17 in perspective, it was more than the Wizards' entire bench plus starting guards put together. He also did a decent job covering the middle on a night when we assumed nobody else could. He had 6 turnovers but we were forced to use him a little more than we usually do on offense. He also hit 4-7 free throws.
--Steve Blake took up the slack on some of the dirty work Brandon usually does. He only took 3 shots for 5 points but he got 7 assists and 6 defensive rebounds.
--Channing Frye scored 10 points in 16 minutes and added 5 rebounds and 2 blocks. He was also 4-4 from the line. That's a line to be proud of. You didn't notice him standing out as peculiar which does a lot to recommend him on a night when the level of play was generally excellent. He was a part of this victory instead of an asterisk.
--Raef LaFrentz spent some quality time on the court tonight! He scored 6 points on 3-7 shooting but more importantly bagged 7 rebounds and 3 blocked shots in 19 minutes. Those are kind of old Raef numbers. It had to feel good to contribute.
--James Jones took a prodigious 9 three-pointers tonight, connecting on 3. One was the all-important chalupa bucket though. He kept the ball moving with 3 assists himself.
--Brandon Roy had 6 points, 4 rebounds, and 4 assists during the one quarter he played. Nice enough.
--Sergio Rodriguez and Von Wafer got some cigar minutes tonight. Neither hit a shot but each notched an assist.
One-Sentence Game Summary
W00T!
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
WOOT! indeed
by myemic23 on Mar 25, 2008 11:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The question is
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 25, 2008 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stat of the night
by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 25, 2008 11:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was frankly shocked
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 25, 2008 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He showed it
by damir on Mar 26, 2008 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a bunch of homers
Didn't you guys notice that neither Blake nor Jack got a single blocked shot?
Didn't you guys notice Joel's assist to turnover ratio?
Didn't you notice that Raef -- RAEF -- was our leading shot-blocker?
Didn't you notice that we committed more fouls than they did?
Didn't you notice that we only got two steals, and only forced 7 turnovers, while committing 13 turnovers ourselves?
EVERY silver lining has a cloud somewhere, if you look hard enough for it. And I looked HARD for it on this game.
by jscot on Mar 26, 2008 12:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Die Nasty?
by GustyJ on Mar 26, 2008 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
It's too late, I already have children.
by jscot on Mar 26, 2008 6:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indisputably
B. They have inherited my bloated ego.
C. They like doing weird things with stats.
D. They are as competitive as I am.
E. They didn't get these things from my wife.
by jscot on Mar 26, 2008 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You sound a lot like me
Of course I think I'd trade that for being dumb, ugly and rich.
by timg56 on Mar 27, 2008 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get a Sugar Momma
by tominhawaii on Mar 27, 2008 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is the kind of game
by ignacio on Mar 26, 2008 2:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bring on...
Is that so much to ask for?
by DonkeyShins on Mar 26, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah. I'm not an expert on groin injuries. I'm just
by annthefan on Mar 26, 2008 3:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think one of the effects of being young
With more experience, these guys will get to the point where they know what to do and don't have to think about it. They won't hesitate, thinking "I should get the ball to LMA" or "Let Brandon take over". Learning to be a cog can actually be harder than having to be "the guy". Most of these guys have been "the guy" their entire basketball lives. For example I think the reason we've seen Jack's numbers slip in a few categories this year is that he's had to deal with a different role than being the starting PG. He knows what it is to be a starting PG. What he is doing this year is new to him.
Two developments we've seen this year that I think bode well for the future:
1) Portland's record in OT games
and
2) our record when Aldridge or Roy have to sit out.
by timg56 on Mar 26, 2008 6:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
this season
Travis freaking Outlaw developed into a 6th man of the year, Roy made the all star game. If the west wasn't so strong we would be in the playoffs, Atlanta is going to make it and they're at .429 winning %. I'm very happy about the Blazers.
by isaacjoe on Mar 26, 2008 12:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
jack in the box
Maybe jack should go to the lucky popcorn more often.
by courtsideerrandboy on Mar 26, 2008 12:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A couple of times I've witnessed the popcorn scene
by Corvid on Mar 26, 2008 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Be careful what you wish for . . .
I've got a lot that I have wished for, but I hope that LMA's and B'Roy's injuries are minor and short-lived and J. Jack keeps his health.
Last night's game was fun -- shooting almost 50% and killing the opposition on the boards almost always makes for a fun night. Plus, we had the fickle finger of fate fall on the opposition tonight -- their shooting percentage stunk like ours did in Seattle. I'm not sure that our defense forced Butler and Jamison into miserable shooting nights any more than Seattle forced us into sub-40% shooting, but, bad shooting by the opposition and 10 blocked shots is still fun to see.
Although Jarrett Jack had the best game I've seen from him in recent history, I'd still like to see how the Blazers operate with a pure point guard (either Blake or Sergio) on the floor without Jack. I thought it was almost criminal that Sergio got only garbage minutes -- especially after B-Roy went down with injury.
So, my first wish is that everyone stay or get healthy, but let's continue to play players in their "natural" positions (stay helathy Jarrett, just not on the floor over 20 minutes).
by vcubed on Mar 26, 2008 12:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
TiH Stats
by tominhawaii on Mar 26, 2008 12:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It isnot fair to play against Nostradamus.
by amlmart1 on Mar 27, 2008 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Khow What?
by tominhawaii on Mar 27, 2008 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It'll be interesting to see how the lads react
It's not unusual for guys to step up in an emergency but more difficult for them to adjust over several games when stars go down.
I think what we've seen out of some of the players is a deference to Roy and LMA to the point where they've become passive. We saw it all the time last year with Zach.
This might be due to them being young and not having figured out their roles or NBA abilities yet. I think the long season is another factor. Day in and day out it's simply easier to let Roy and LMA do it and it takes real effort to move, pass the ball and cut, etc. and that's a level of focus that's tough for young players.
Here's hoping having Roy out and LMA hobbled gives some of the young guys the boost they need to learn they too can make plays and consistently score in the high double digits.
by jon on Mar 26, 2008 3:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Long story short
Nice win. Let's see you keep doing it. The NBA is hard that way.
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 26, 2008 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing?
Building up my ego. That's what this whole season is all about. Priorities, priorities, priorities!
by jscot on Mar 27, 2008 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ding! Ding! Ding!
Three cheers for Jscot the Great!
Hip-hip...Huzzah! Hip-hip...Huzzah! Hip-hip...Huzzah!
I will ask Ben to ask Coach McMillan if he can arrange precisely 39 wins and not 41 or 42. We'll see what Nate says.
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 27, 2008 2:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
I'll settle for 42, since that was the average of my mid-season and pre-season predictions.
Either one gives me an opportunity to spin things so that I can convince at least myself of my own brilliance. I don't need much to work with.
Now that you've labeled me "The Great" there's a lot of potential already. Who else around here gets such accolades?
by jscot on Mar 27, 2008 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of egos
by jscot on Mar 27, 2008 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nay sir!
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 27, 2008 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oer'weeing ego
It is clear by the rest of your comment that you weren't thinking of the former meaning, but the latter, conjoined with your comment, produces rather disturbing visual images. I could say more, but I fear we're spinning out of control here.
by jscot on Mar 27, 2008 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Oer'weening indeed. The image is priceless.
--Dave
by Dave on Mar 27, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laughed a long time
For future reference (if you see this), I think the apostrophe is supposed to go where a letter (in this case the 'v') is left out: O'erweening
by jscot on Mar 28, 2008 3:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















