Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Ole Miss-Alabama: "Let's Go Eat.Wait. What Happened?"

Game 66 Recap: Blazers 85, Kings 96

Boxscore

Well, that wasn't exactly our finest hour.  We looked, for the lack of a better word, very vanilla out there.  And not the luscious bean-y kind of gourmet vanilla either.  More like the last two spoonfuls of that non-fat, sugar-free, freezer-burned stuff sitting in the very back of your freezer from last year's summer diet attempt.  

The thing that surprises me most--OK, "surprise" isn't the right word, but it does make me shake my head still--is how easily we slip into semi-passive jump-shooting against a team like this.  I know that's our bread and butter, but you have to vary your game somewhat based on your opponent.  Sure Sacramento packed the middle, but we didn't even test them.  We just heaved and heaved and heaved after one or two passes around the edge.  You can count our serious drive attempts on your fingers.  Shooting 38.5% and only scoring 85 against the Kings is like going to a Vegas buffet and only having carrot sticks.

We also committed 19 turnovers and gave up 27 points off them.  That's a big no-no for this team, especially since you can't credit it to aggression in any way, shape, or form.  Ron Artest once again sent Brandon Roy into his own, personal shame spiral.  The dude ended up with 6 steals all on his own.  It's easy to forget because of all of the other things that surround him, but Artest is a massive talent.  It kind of makes me sick when I think if he had a reasonable amount of dedication and sanity he probably would have been ranked at least as high as Scottie Pippen in the annals of NBA history.  The guy has everything you'd want, and yet he's going to schlep around the league wearing out welcomes until he gets too old to play.  A head-screwed-on-straight Artest would be exactly what our team needs, but if his head were on right he'd never be available.

We also had a real problem getting back down the court in transition defense.  I'm a little tired of seeing only one or two Blazers get back and everyone else giving up on the play.  I thought Lamarcus Aldridge looked particularly slow as he trotted back and forth.  I wonder if he's having foot troubles again.

We did outrebound the Kings, which was good.  I thought our guards played better defense than they usually do as well.  We never let their guards get off, which is no simple task.  It's too bad we couldn't capitalize.  You tell me Kevin Martin and Beno Udrih only hit 8 shots and score 20 points between them and I'd tell you we probably walked away with this game.  In reality it was never close.

I hate to keep using poker analogies, but they're simple and they work.  This was a game where we only checked, called, or folded.  We never raised or pushed or came anywhere near a bluff.  Artest kept giving them the flush, which is exactly what I'd like to do with this game.

Individual Notes

--Brandon Roy scored 21 with 9 rebounds and 6 assists but he looked uncharacteristically sloppy out there.  His 5 turnovers tell part of the story.  He wasn't really hustling for passes or trying to drive much.  I mean, that's a brilliant stat line by any measure, but this isn't a game he'll save to show his grandkids.

--Lamarcus had 20 again, with 6 rebounds.  He also had 6 turnovers.  (The Kings pretty much knew the players they wanted to harass I guess.)  A couple of them were cheap, but he also earned a few.  Not a bad game overall, but not his best either.

--Joel Przybilla had 10 rebounds and 3 blocks and pretty much did his best to light a fire under us.  It looked to me like he was getting frustrated at the beginning of the second half though.  He started jawing at the Kings and collected a couple of silly fouls.  Joel does become a little bit of a loose cannon at times.  I guess I didn't mind it in this game.  At least he tried something.

--Martell scored 10 points on 3-6 shooting in 23 minutes.  I didn't notice him much I guess, outside of that one Sportscenter-ish dunk he couldn't control.

--I noticed Steve Blake missed a few shots tonight, going 2-12.  He also had 3 turnovers to go along with his 6 assists.  He was part of the defensive crew though.

--Travis Outlaw was the bench star tonight, scoring 13 points and grabbing 5 rebounds in 28 minutes.  He wasn't taking the best shots but it's Travis.  I wanted him to drive more.

--Channing Frye had 7 rebounds in 18 minutes, which is fantastic.  He also had 4 fouls.  He's becoming quite the foul machine lately.  I wonder if this is aggressive Channing or tired Channing.  He did hit that nifty buzzer-beater from a few feet inside the halfcourt line to end the first period.  That was cool.  I like that the Blazers will dare to take those shots.

--James Jones hit one 3-pointer but was basically a non-factor.

--Jarrett Jack once again shot an 0-fer.  On the bright side he only had 1 turnover.  On the other hand he had no assists.  These last two games have been two of his most ineffective of the season.

--Sergio Rodriguez was basically a placeholder tonight, though I guess that's better than a bench-groover.  I was hoping he could spark some penetration or tempo (which we sorely needed) but other than one nifty entry pass to Frye off of the pick-and-roll (which Frye subsequently borked) there was no real action.

--Von Wafer!  Von Wafer!  Von Wafer!  That was one more mention of his name than he had minutes on the court but he got a rebound and an assist.  That makes his Per-48 right around 24 rebounds and 24 assists!  I told you he was good!

Random Question:  Does anyone else find it mildly patronizing when the broadcast picks out girls in the crowd to show after EVERY break?  That's pretty much what happened on the Sacramento feed.  I mean, I like seeing pretty women as much as the next person I suppose, but they started making me feel a little bit slimy, like that guy in the crowd who stares a little too hard at someone's cleavage.

One-Sentence Game Summary:

I can't believe I missed my Hee-Haw reruns for this.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 28 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ugly
Yeah, that wasn't too pretty tonight.

As far as the camera crew goes, having worked at the Rose Garden for a few years, I can tell you that the feed that gets looped through the closed circuits in the arena shows their "footage" during non-game time. Hilarious. I think "it", "it" being a penchant for buggery, might be a prerequisite to being an NBA cameraman.
 

by BlazerD on Mar 13, 2008 11:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ogling
Yeah, I was watching the Sacto feed and it was pretty obvious early in the game.  At the level they're doing it, it's beyond just a slimy camera crew. I wonder if the organization is trying to draw a few more fans to the arena by showing off all the "talent" in the crowd.

by shralpster on Mar 13, 2008 11:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Two things
  1. Considering how sloppy the Blazers were playing that was the only thing that kept this East Coast person awake to watch the whole contest (One because I had a hard time believing it was happening and two because I was curious if there were that many good looking girls in Sacramento.  Turns out they repeated a couple of times)
  2. Remember it is the Maloof brothers who own the Kings.  I think they own a casino in Las Vegas that caters to the good looking crowd.......

by blazermaniac32 on Mar 14, 2008 6:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every time I see a kings game I
Thank god that denver dident get artest. There is a chance that they could have exploded and made George Karl go on a shooting rampage, but man. The thuggets would have swept us for quite a few years in a row with ron. Match up hell.

by Sabonis4Ever on Mar 14, 2008 12:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I didn't see the game, only the box score, but ...
It looks like the Blazers' rebounding edge cancels out their turnovers edge in terms of total possessions, and in fact most of their numbers look really decent. They simply lost on shooting percentage.

And the shooting wasn't even that bad -- except for Blake (2-12) and Jack (0-5). If they had gone a hardly-extreme 5-12 and 2-5 with a three-pointer, that's the difference in the game.

by qiaoshun on Mar 14, 2008 2:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Travis was NOT the bench star
That's just flat wrong.  5-13 isn't very good, and that doesn't even begin to account for the numerous dumb mistakes he made.

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 14, 2008 7:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Then who
is the bench star?  Frye?

Don't forget about Travis's 2 blocked shots.  He was playing some defense too.

Bingo, bango, bongo!

by Babyshoes on Mar 14, 2008 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol
Travis and defense, funny stuff.

Nobody was a star last night, the entire team was terrible.

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 14, 2008 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a difference
between "bench star" and "star off of the bench".  The general point was that Travis was pretty bleh but he looked like a superstar compared to the rest of the bench unit.

I'll be more precise in my description next time.

--Dave

by Dave on Mar 14, 2008 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never have issues with looking at attractive
women.

I do have a few with watching uninspired basketball though.

I was pumped for a banner evening last night.  I figured to split my time between the Maryland ACC Tourniment game against BC and the Blazer game.  Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately) the Terps game was on something called ESPN FullCourt, which I don't get.  I was hoping for a Maryland victory, followed by a Blazer win followed by ...., well lets just say it involved my wife.  Didn't happen.  

by timg56 on Mar 14, 2008 7:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You may call me crazy
but when Jack is slumping bigtime (1-18 shooting with 9 points total in the last 3 games is kind of a slump) don't you want to see at least some of his minutes (61 in those 3 games) going to Serge?  I don't believe Jack is going to be this bad for too long, but while he is, what's Sergio gonna do, make it worse?
Bingo, bango, bongo!

by Babyshoes on Mar 14, 2008 7:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

YOUR'RE CRAZY!
For Sergio to have a worse March than Jack is having would seriously be a miracle, yet people on here will still say that they'd prefer Jack to get those minutes--and, no, it doesn't make sense to me either. Take any 158  (or 60 for that matter) minute chunk of Sergio's season and you'll find he outperforms Jack's last 158 minutes (or 60) , so I think your point is very, very valid. Though to be fair, Jack is playing almost unbelievably bad, even for Jack.
Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com

by sergioFTW on Mar 14, 2008 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defense Wins Ballgames
A couple thoughts on our defense last night: LMA got called for a couple of ugly offensive fouls.  Mikki Moore (who can shoot the rock lately, so I think your comment yesterday about him was a little off) was harassing the hell out of him.  

Travis had two blocks (one great one on Hawes), but you can't expect him to guard artest in the post.  Ron-Ron is just too strong and gets away with a TON of contact.

Joel got pretty pissed a few times (getting in Miller's face and then in Kevin Martin's), but I like that.  We need someone who will throw down on a team that is man-handling us.  Watching all the jersey and hand-grabbing that went on made me angry at the Kings, at first.  And then I started to get annoyed with the Blazers, who would either let it happen and take bad shots or would get called for a stupid offensive or retaliation foul.

Guys like Artest and Bruce Bowen play aggressive, physical defense that borders on dirty.  If we had someone other than James Jones or Joel who'd play that kind of defense (especially in the post), we wouldn't have gotten destroyed in points in the paint.  

It takes a very mature team to play great team defense.  There are definitely flashes of this in every game, but not consistently.  Hopefully as LMA, Frye, Outlaw and Martell mature, we'll see more and more lock-down D when we need it.

by bensonblazer on Mar 14, 2008 8:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Gotta stop giving up so many freakin points in the
paint.  I don't know what the answer is, but it's gotta stop.  I think the burden mostly falls on LMA, Outlaw, and Webster.  Prz and Roy are doing their parts.

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 14, 2008 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dreadlocks
I think that dreadlocks give floppers like Mike Moore and unfair advantage and should be banned from the league. It looks like his head explodes every time he goes into his act!
2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Mar 14, 2008 8:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Roy/Blake
Despite the numbers this was one of Brandons worst overall floor games. That really hurt us.

Steve Blake is initiating the offense to often and leaving Brandon as a decoy or observer.
I like Steve, but we run way to many unsuccessful pick and rolls with him and leave Brandon out of the game.
We need to run the offense through Brandon as our first option, and LA as our second.
The rest of the guys are role players and will get plenty of shots because of all of the attention the defense must give to BRoy and LA.

This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's out there.

by Jack Burton on Mar 14, 2008 9:06 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Blake got stuck forcing up several ugly shots
Some of them were against the shot clock,and I think some of them were because the offense was so broken-down he didn't know what else to do.

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 14, 2008 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake
I'm not upset with Blake for missing shots, I just think he has the ball in hands to much, he's not a creator or a scorer, he's more of facilitator who can shoot the 3 and play a little d.
I just think Brandon should have the ball more, he seemed to initate the O alot more during our streak. When he does have the ball, he gets a good shot or someone else does because of his ability to penetrate.
This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's out there.

by Jack Burton on Mar 14, 2008 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the bright side Rebecca Harlow is looking
hotter game by game.  Wasn't a big fan at the beginning of the season, but now I actually enjoy her reports (with "mute" on)

by leeroyjenkins on Mar 14, 2008 9:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great summary Dave
I thoroughly enjoy your insight on the game, your writing style, and those ultra-vivid analogies you can conjure up like no one else.

Now back to my stale vanilla yogurt.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Mar 14, 2008 9:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Assists
While I didn't actually get to see the game last night (my Comcast is all messed up and won't give me SportsNet, but that's a rant for elsewhere), I was struck by our lack of assists.  It seems to me that having only 3 players in the assist column in unacceptable (especially when the 3rd player to get an assist was VonWafer in the closing minutes of the game!).  That indicates to me that we were playing entirely too much one-on-one basketball, which is not exactly the strength of this team.  Sure we shoot the rock well when moving the ball and getting open looks, but going one-on-one negates those possibilities.  That coupled with the high number of turnovers basically decided the game for us.

by CMCWizard on Mar 14, 2008 10:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Too many minutes for LMA and BR (and Jack)
This is probably heresy, but I think we are playing B-Roy and LMA too many minutes as starters.  B-Roy paces himself (as he needs to playing 40+ minutes on a bad ankle) and I think he tends to be far less productive (and more turnover-prone) when he does not have the ball in his hands.  I think fatigue (either physical or mental) has him standing around or making weak, lazy passes.  I'd rather see him play fewer minutes (like mid-30's) and be more focused.

Likewise, LMA's production goes down if he plays too many minutes.  It may be that his feet are killing him, but it seems like he, too, is suffering from both mental and physical fatigue.  Many of his fouls (offensive or defensive) seem like fatigue fouls (i.e., his body is not able to do what his mind commands).

And for all those who say, "Oh, no, players have to tough it out for 40 minutes a night for 82 games!" I say "Hooey."  It makes no sense to run injured players into the ground and risk greater injury when there is no tangible reward for the risk.  (We're not going to make the playoffs and would still make a quick exit if we did.)

I think Jack's overage in minutes falls into a different category.  Jack plays too many minutes because Nate seems fixated on small ball and avoiding turnovers from aggresively pushing the pace.  (Ironically, Nate seems to tolerate passive, bone-headed turnovers [i.e., stepping out of bounds, weak passes] by Jack more than any other player.)

I'd like to see the Blazers experiment a bit more the balance of this year with Roy playing fewer total minutes but more time at the point; less time for Jack and Blake at the "2" with more time there for Martell, James Jones, or even Wafer [kind of a pre-Rudy test to see if we will switch B-Roy from 2 to PG.].  Play LMA only the minutes his feet let him play effectively -- and don't play him at center.  Let's assume next year that Oden and Pryzbilla will cover center so let's give LMA a break from center duties, but play PF more effectively.

Finally, let's try to reduce passive turnovers but not be mortified if we commit some aggressive turnovers.  Again, I'd be inclined to see less Jack and more Sergio but I'd put that in the fat chance category.

Seems to me that we need to protect some of our most valuable resources (B-Roy and LMA) while we find out what might work in the Oden/Fernandez era (i.e., Roy more at point and LMA exclusively at PF).

As for last night's loss, anytime we shoot under 40% (.385), have 20 turnovers, and only 13 assists, we're going to lose.  Why do we play our shooters (Jones, Webster) less and our short guards (Jack, Blake) more when we aren't scoring?

by vcubed on Mar 14, 2008 2:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Fat chance indeed!
In the month of March, Jack could barely being playing any worse basketball, but at most has only received a minor reduction in minutes while Sergio has only played in 2 of 7 games for a total of 13 minutes, versus Jack's 7 games and 158 minutes.
Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com

by sergioFTW on Mar 14, 2008 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hooey
Dude, I'm going to make "Hooey" into a cuss sword.  

Last night I was looking at this hooey chick with this hooey da kine, and I was all like, "Damn, if I wasn't married, I'd hooey that like a hooey hooey."  

"And even as I wander, I'm keeping you in sight. You're a candle in the wind, On a cold, dark winter's night."

by tominhawaii on Mar 14, 2008 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To paraphrase George Carlin...
Get down off your horse, Tom.  I'm gonna hooey you.  But I'm gonna hooey you slow.

by ken on Mar 14, 2008 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay 2 things...
    #1. You can buy a Hee-Haw collection on DVD now. I get insomnia a lot so I know. You can also get every song every played in the 60's and 70's from Time/Life, it comes with a picture of a pyschodelicly painted VW Bus. Choose your poison.

    #2. No it doesn't bother me when they show girls in the crowd before each break. If I can sit in the comfort of my own home and see a good looking woman before the break, and let some distant camera man take the heat for being a leach, then great for me!
    Really whats the option. Fade away to the antics of the annoying mascot? The players? Or the Dancers? (same difference). Staring at cleavage may not be the classiest act, but YOU know we all do it. Who say's the glance isn't classy? It's a chance for a girl to be on Television, if you are thinking "dirty" with each fade away that's your problem.
   I see a beautiful woman and I say, I bet she's a wonderful well rounded human being!....and then I stare at her cleavage. I need a pair of Brandons X-Ray glasses.

     

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Mar 14, 2008 10:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Two many fouls on the Blazers in this one.
Saw this game in person. The Arco Arena is a flop house compared to the Rose Garden by the way. There were a lot of fouls called on the blazers. I think the refs really hurt us in this one again. One foul in praticular on outlaw when he went for a lose ball mid court and was nailed by the kings, it seemed pretty obvious at that point. Another bad call clear as day was when Artest had his whole foot over the line with a ref 3 feet away and they still counted his bucket as a 3. When I looked at the stats toward the end of the forth there were more than 4 kings with 0 fouls including there most physical player Artest. I know we played sloppy and thats probobly why we lost but Im starting to wonder about the refs giving star players special treatment. Seems like any teams main scorer or star player never ends up in to much foul trouble.

by artybobb on Mar 15, 2008 1:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Sched Ahead 2/8/10, Week Fifteen -- Tie-breakers Revisited
Img_0165_small
The Blazer Dome (w/ poll)
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Checking in with Petteri Koponen: "Finally I feel at home"
3706648989_9462e35a8e_small
Rudy's MARCA blog: Why does everything happen to me?
Usa_america_fort_knox_gold_bars_bricks_bullion_small
Team Defense: Jack Ramsay and the Portland Trailblazers

Recent FanPosts

N1313394467_27679_4745_small
Dear David Stern,
Community-alison-brie13_small
Batum Facts JD 2/8(get it? 2 8's would be 88)
Dscn2293_small
Superjunk 2/7
Small
Roy out for the All-Star Game
Small
tony luftman returning?
Abe_lovers_me_small
Blazer Fan Haunts and Hangouts Ptown
Dscf3120_small
all 35 and older team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

batum's choice of web browser slightly diminishes his awesomeness, but not by much
how many times has kobe lost in portland?
For the past years, my father and I have NEVER been on TV, not even close. We have such bad luck at games, we never win any of the cheap prizes (not even a chance, never come close) but our luck in the past 2 games have dramatically changed. Last time we got the game ball, this time we very creepily are in the back on national television. I'm just letting the 15 minutes of fame soak in. What will be next?

I also apologize to Martell Webster for stealing his spotlight tonight


ps... today is my birthday if you want to give me a nice birthday gift then rec this for fun. Going to the Lakers game tomorrow as well, great birthday present from my father (2 amazing blazer games in 3 days)!
Talking With Travis: The Education of Patty Mills
B-Roy on KJR in Seattle

Recent FanShots

Przybilla is a month and a half ahead of schedule on his rehab
Chris Kaman replaces Roy
Trade Idea
Rudy's Campus 2010. Even has some video of little Rudy.
I lol'd.
orthotics...do the blazers use these?
Blazers still wanting Butler?
taco bell commercial with the blazer fan
Simple Trade
ESPN loves them some Lakers!

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm