Game 49 Recap: Blazers 82, Pistons 91
Game 49 Recap
I'm not going with the normal post-game format tonight because this wasn't a normal game. (And as I said at the end of the post-game stint with Gavin tonight, thank goodness this isn't a normal game nowadays! It used to be.)
It's fairly easy to describe what happened:
- It looked like everybody in that locker room knew that without Brandon we didn't have much of a chance. I know the fans and media were saying that (because it was true) but I didn't expect the team to play quite so much like it. With the exception of moments of offensive brilliance from Lamarcus pretty much everything and everybody looked tentative and stunted. It looked like we lost this game before we ever took the floor.
- Yes, the Pistons are that good.
- Nobody but the person handling the ball moved ANYWHERE in our offensive sets. No player movement made it easy for Detroit to thwart our passing game. Without passing our offense stinks. We cannot generate good shots one-on-one, especially without Roy. It's just not our game...not even Lamarcus' that much. If you see one person dribbling and four people frozen at our end of the court we're going to lose.
- There didn't look to be much communication on defense either. We botched a few pick coverages. We let people sneak behind us without so much as a peep or a head turn. When we did help each other the rotation was often too late. The result was either made shots or our big guys being out of position for rebounds.
- Don't overlook the absence of James Jones either. He really opens up the floor for us. Without that deep-shooting threat we lose a lot of operating space.
- On top of everything the Pistons outhustled us every minute that mattered. That was the icing on the cake.
--Lamarcus was just about the only guy hitting offensively. I'm willing to forgive him some of the defensive troubles considering who he was guarding. The hard part for me is that he had 5 rebounds in the first few minutes of the first quarter and ended up with 6 total for the game. Only 2 of those were defensive. As I said we were exposing him a little and putting him out of position, but still...
--We made ZERO three pointers tonight. (When was the last time that happened?)
--We had ZERO blocked shots tonight. And it's not like the Pistons weren't driving.
--We allowed Detroit to shoot 49%, 3 points over their season average.
--We also allowed 26 assists on 36 made buckets. We're normally the ones doing that to the other team.
--We needed Martell, Jarrett, and Travis to step up. Martell shot 2-10. Travis shot 2-8 in 18 minutes. Jarrett was 4-7 for 10 points but had 6 turnovers.
--On top of that Steve Blake shot 3-10 and Sergio was 0-4. Between them and Taurean our point guards were a combined 5-18 tonight. We have a hard time winning when that happens when Brandon is playing, let alone when he's gone.
And that's about it. There's no real lasting damage done unless the team carries the funk into Indiana tomorrow. The key for tomorrow will be two "P's": professional (meaning letting this loss go) and passionate. We'll see if this young team is up to the task.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
But Dave
Taurean also looked really good for a guy playing in garbage time. He looked like he was a calming influence on a chaotic floor. He could have gunned it more and seemed to play within control. Early in the year he shot waaay too much and didn't look to distribute. 50% fg% a couple of assists and one BS carrying call TO with one bonehead TO. Not too bad a showing from the rook.
If we end up out of Playoff position I really want to see more burn for both of these guys. As it is I'd like to see more Taurean before we trade him so we know what he is worth. I still have a crazy gut feeling he might be one of our bench guards in the long run. Even if I'm wrong about that I don't want to deal him away as a throw in and regret it.
What did you see Dave?
I liked the way Taurean played tonight...
BTW Myemic
I mentioned the radio show because I hate it when people repeat things and don't credit the fact that they've said it before...like they were inventing something new every time when they're really just saying it twice. I do that whether I've said it on the radio or in a diary here that only three people have read.
Life is better when you assume the best about people instead of the worst, and that includes me.
--Dave
my bad
ps I think you do a bang up job around here and probably dont say that enough, so thanks for the all your harkwork and insight...
I saw guys playing
Granted they played well but this is hardly indicative of anything. Garbage time is called that for a reason.
I'm not trying to put down their play at all. They did exactly what they were supposed to, as you have mentioned. But I'm not excited yet.
--Dave
McRoberts and Green need more time
I'm hooked on change
The best part of Our last Game, was watchin' the Rooks play. For me at least.
I think you might have enjoyed a little change of pace also.
"Lenny Suckerpunch NEVER bet on me!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblowby Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 9, 2008 1:51 PM PST up reply actions
When Josh and Taurean
Right now, with the Blazers still clinging to a faint playoff hope, they don't want to run the risk of throwing two raw, untested players into the mix. Nate's rotation since the 5-12 start has done an excellent job of masking the many flaws in this Oden-less roster. It's not really clear where Green and McRoberts would fit into those established rotations, or whether they're even battle-tested enough to contribute in any meaningful way in crucial game situations.
As someone who believes that Portland will fall short of a playoff berth this year, I think you will see the two rookies get some meaningful PT this year. The only question is when.
where was roy?
n/m
my condolences Brandon.
I missed this game
New offense?
Detroit noise
Anybody have first hand experience at the Palace? If it's truly like it sounded last night I'll take the RG any game.
I was at the game last night
I don't think it helped that their halftime entertainment was 'jazzercise' -- a group of 100 moms in white tops and black spandex pants that basically just did their workout routine for the crowd. Let's just say that I hope none of my ticket money went to them.
As far as evaluating Blazers players themselves, it's clear that without Roy the Blazers really are just a 24 win team. They depend so much on Roy to set up the offense and generate opportunities for other players. They also depend on him for their confidence against other teams. I like Aldridge and feel that he will be a solid contributor as he matures, but I'm not sure he has the mental makeup to ever become a game-changer like Roy or Outlaw. I'm not sure why I feel this way. It's just a feeling that I've had all season while watching him play. But I find myself having to constantly remind myself that it is still only his second season. In a way, Roy's success, being only a second year player, makes everyone else on the team look like a slacker.
I hate to say it, but personally the only guys I keep for sure on the team at this point are Roy and Oden. For the right price I could even part with Aldridge. And everyone else, well... you better start doing more to realize your potential or play with more consistency. I'm pretty sure that by next season, there will be more than a few roster changes.
Let's hope for a better result tonight in Indiana. Go Blazers!
At what point do the players and the coaches
Yeah JJ, Martell, we know there was little to no effort last night. We know you got beat on the boards. We know you can't seem to shoot above 45% as a team. We know that nobody on the tam except for Joel and Brandon can play defense. We know, we know, we know.
NOW FIX IT.
Rally tired of "Gee, yeah we got manhandled." "Gosh, that team has a superstar and that's what superstars do." "That team is really good, holy cow I wish we were that good." etc etc.
Jack's problem wasn't too little effort
Overall, this was a look at where the team might be without Brandon Roy. It wasn't a pretty sight. To the Pistons' credit, they executed well on offense and played solid D from the start. I think Dave may not have given them enough props for the latter. He mentioned a complete lack of movement by the Blazers, but I watched them try to run Martell off the series of screens (ala Rip Hamilton) time and time again, and the Piston defenders chased him down so effectively that he never could get open. I guess it's not surprising that the masters of that play would know exactly how to defend it.

by 



















