Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Game 47 Recap: Blazers 103 Nuggets 105

Game 47 Recap

This game was like a six-day old Bavarian Cream doughnut.  It was really tough at the beginning, had a sweet, gooey center, and then got tough again on the back side.  Was it worth the calories?  Probably.  How else did you want to spend your evening?

Boxscore

Team Observations

The first quarter tonight was as bad as anything we saw in the pre-Brandon years.  We shot 20% from the floor.  The starters' scoring was non-existent.  We got out-rebounded by E...I...G...H...T.  That is just wrong.  The Mikes hit it on the head (as we have before too) in saying that fatigue is starting to take its toll...not just physical fatigue but mental as well.  Lamarcus Aldridge surpassed his minutes played for all of last season in this game.  Brandon Roy is around 7 games away from equaling his mark from last year.  Everybody has to be far more involved in the offensive game with Zach gone.  The kind of defense we play also depends on effort from everyone.  Don't be deceived because we're not running much...it takes a fair amount of physical and a ton of mental energy to do what we're doing.  We're depending on guys who, for the most part, have not done it before.  The road is long and the speed bumps numerous and we see that in starts like we had tonight.

To our credit we really went after it hard in the middle quarters and erased our deficit, even grabbing a lead late in the third.  We did it with hustle, rebounding, and passing.  We showed Denver and the world what Blazer basketball looks like...and it was a brilliant, exhilarating rush.

The fourth quarter and overtime were a straight-out dogfight.  It got physical and intense.  It was thrilling to watch the teams trade blows.  Neither one would let the other escape.  In the end it came down to just a couple closing plays for each side.  Allen Iverson ended up better at converting his than we were at converting ours.  No surprise there and not much shame either.

After that rotten start we ended up only 2 down in rebounding, equal in shooting percentage, 7 ahead in free throw attempts, almost dead even in steals, turnovers, and points off turnovers, and way ahead in assists.  In short we fought a very good team with established stars tooth and nail and gave them everything they could handle in an atmosphere where both teams went all out.

Were there mistakes?  Of course there were.  We saw Channing Frye's bad pass to end the third, Travis and Martell missing potential deciding free throws, Jarrett Jack not holding for the last shot.  Those were just the obvious ones.  We also saw consecutive possessions where only one Blazer got back in transition defense against a team that loves to run.  We saw rebound after rebound pass by in the early going.  We saw ill-advised jumpers and our lane opening up to their drives.  The lesson here is that any one of those mistakes prevented could have won the game.  Sometimes games, seasons, and legacies hang on a thread that small.  This wasn't one of those nights, but it foreshadows them.  Mark down another page in the Blazer Basketball Primer as read and (hopefully) absorbed.

This was a game where "right now" met "not quite yet".  The surprise isn't that "right now" found a way to squeak by.  It was that "not quite yet" proved such a handful...perhaps indicating that their "right now" is closer than you think.

Individual Observations

--Brandon Roy had another great night with 26 points, 8 free throw attempts, 8 assists, 7 rebounds, 2 steals, a block, and only 1 turnover while being dogged hard by Denver athletes.  His two-handed steal from AI on the break was amazing to see.  How many times have you seen that happen before, let alone to a Hall-of-Famer?

--Martell Webster didn't attempt a shot in the first half.  He made up for it by torching the net in the third quarter en route to 17 points and 5 rebounds.  After his brief flare-up, however, he faded into the background again.

--A lot of people are giving Jarrett Jack grief for the mistaken 1-on-3 push in the closing seconds of the game.  It was the wrong decision, but he's also a young player.  I bet he doesn't do that a second time in his whole career.  His 7 turnovers stand out but no more so than his 17 points, 9 rebounds, 9 assists, 3 steals, and 6-13 shooting.  He was a net positive.  Without him we don't make it into overtime in the first place.

--Lamarcus Aldridge got 12 rebounds on a night we needed every one.  He also got 4 blocks.  Applause is warranted there.  We can't have him taking only 9 shots though, especially on a night when Camby was out.  Even more:  we can't have him missing 7 of those 9.  Show me a game where Lamarcus scores 4 points and I'll show you a game we lose no matter what else happens.

--Steve Blake caught on fire from distance when the game opened up in the second half.  More importantly he had 9 assists and was a key catalyst for the ball movement.

--Joel Przybilla did a credible job in his 17 minutes.  The Nuggets went small which kept him out of the game.

--Channing Frye was the only guy keeping our offense afloat in the disastrous early going.  As many have said, he should play Denver every night.  He only ended up with 1 rebound though and his defense left a little something to be desired.

--Travis Outlaw had 16 points and 10 rebounds and helped to turn the game around for us.  He also drew 6 foul shots which is a part of his game he needs to take advantage of.  Yes he missed the critical one but the team put him in that position to begin with by not building more of a cushion.

One-Sentence Game Summary:

The same game showed us both how far we have come and how far we have yet to go.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 23 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Awesome recap, Dave
I love how you accentuate the positive and realistic.
Keeps me sane.

by Section323 on Feb 4, 2008 11:32 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

you pretty much summed it up
The only thing I differ with you on (not that you care!) is Jarrett. He simply is the most frustrating player on our team to watch, and just continues to make IRRITATING mistakes. Oh well.

by mark twain on Feb 4, 2008 11:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Good
Dave, I appreciate the fact that you're not too high or too low. People are too quick to say, "WE NOW HAVE NO CHANCE AT THE PLAYOFFS!", just as they were too quick a month ago to say, "WE'RE GOIN' TO THE 'CHIP!"

The reality is probably somewhere in between, and tonight's game was a good indicator of that impending reality. I hope everyone can just enjoy the ride.

(On a side note, can we get a blowout on Wednesday? I'm tired of overtime games. Seriously.)

by 2011champs on Feb 5, 2008 12:09 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

jarrett
its just so hard to believe that a 3rd year guy could make so many mental mistakes as he does.  this is a guy that nate trusts as a starter as well.  he played hard and did some awesome stuff...but seeing these small mental errors regularly just is so frustrating.  

when Trout was stepping out of bounds with regularity...atleast he recognized it and corrected his error.  here we are in feb...and jack still does it.  

by Philthyanimal on Feb 5, 2008 12:24 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

As I posted @ marktwain's diary
Jack was not the reason the Blazers lost tonight.  I was at the game, and I observed Jack making good plays all over the court.  Without him, the Blazers wouldn't have come close tonight.  

Also, as I recall that play on which he stepped out of bounds wasn't his usual bonehead step-back before driving to the hoop move.  Instead, he was heading upcourt and ran into a defender.  Back in the day, that was ruled a "force-out," and the ballhandler's team was awarded possession.  Now, the refs must decide between calling a foul on the defender or a turnover on the ballhandler.  Usually, that goes against the ballhandler, as it did tonight.

Having defended Jack's overall contribution to tonight's Blazer effort, I have to agree about that 1 on 3 fastbreak attempt.  Jack is truly bad at running fast breaks.  More often than not, instead of looking for a teammate or pulling the ball out if defenders are back, he puts his head down and tries to finish himself--as he did on that play.  Hopefully, a light will go off in Jarrett's head one of these days and his fast break judgement will improve.

"Ime caught the guy in mid-air with a fist and calmly continued his dispatching of oncoming people." -Gabe Muoneke

by hurryup09 on Feb 5, 2008 2:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

blake
i'll be more comfortable with putting blake in the closing minutes and starting jack...than vice versa right now.  maybe this team needs to get things shaken up a bit to get out of this slump.  

i am glad to see nate play pryz during defensive positions late in the game however.  

martells d was phenomenal tonight against melo.

by Philthyanimal on Feb 5, 2008 12:26 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Blazers are so close
As a Nuggets fan, I am already thinking of the Blazers as a threat.  Dave's post was refreshing to me.  I forget that this is a team that has not yet arrived.  Obviously I realize the future is brighter than the present for you guys, but the way the Blazers have played this season I already view them as almost as great a threat as Utah.  

What I am trying to say is that the Nuggets are in a must win now type season due to their aging players, but Portland is already right there with them.  If the Nuggets drop a game like this we see out hopes slipping away.  When Portland drops a game like this you guys see how close your hopes are to being realized.

I do not know if that makes any sense to you guys.  I am still worn out from watching that thrilling game and may not be thinking straight.

Pickaxe and Roll a SB Nation Denver Nuggets Blog

by Jeremy on Feb 5, 2008 12:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Not thinking straight
Don't worry about that.  It's expected, actually.  If you were the kind of guy who thinks straight, you'd be a Blazer fan, instead, right?

(Your comments make a lot of sense, but don't tell anyone I said so, ok?)

by jscot on Feb 5, 2008 12:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You make a lot of sense...
Thanks for the kind words.  Good stuff on your blog, too, keep up the good work. It will grow.

by ken on Feb 5, 2008 4:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Since Dave handled the positives...
LMA:  Was much better rebounding tonight, obviously he was making an effort to get fingertips on rebounds.  Caught the ball at the top of the key several times with room in the lane and settled for long jumpers - will always have poor shooting nights as long as he continues to do so.  The team's 2nd option/leader needs to step up in big games like these, and instead LMA has a habit of fading into the background.

Brandon:  Good game, but there's only so much he can do.  I sense he's getting frustrated with some of the preventable mistakes and being the only one Nate can depend on to handle the ball without making a dumb mistake late in games.

Martell:  What can you say about this guy?  Played one great quarter and three totally forgettable ones.  Will he ever 'get it'?  4-7 at the free throw line??  Chill out with the emotion, mix in a little focus and consistency.

Prz:  Decent in his 17 min of play.  His offensive skills make me sick, however.  Catch.  Turn.  Dunk.  Now do it faster.

Blake:  Eh.  9 assist/1 TO is nice.  Missed some big shots though (4-13 FG).

Channing Frye:  1 rebound in 21 minutes?

Jarrett Jack:  Great game til you look at the 7 TO.  7 TO is serious business, it's hard to overcome a player who turns the ball over 7 times.  He needs to slooooooooow doooooooown.  That last sequence was ridiculous, I can't even imagine what his brain was telling him there.  Careless/dumb turnovers are a recurring problem for JJ and (imo) that weakness is going to prevent him from sticking around because his one real skill - bulling his way into the paint - requires him to handle the ball.

Travis:  More of the same, although he was a little better in stretches.  If he goes strong to the rim or shoots short jumpers in rythm he's money.  If he shoots fadeaways early in the clock he's useless.  Unfortunately, too often it's the latter.  His last jumper K-Mart shoved down his throat, and I just felt sad for the guy.  In addition to his poor shot selection, Travis is by far the weakest defender on the team.  He's like a sieve, ming-boggling when you take into account he's tall, quick, wiry, and can jump.  99% of the time Travis's man beats him, and 1% of the time Travis recovers gets a block or a steal.  He might even be worse than Zach, and that's saying something.  Travis could be such a good player, but I fear he'll never reach his ceiling due to intelligence and confidence constraints.  The most frustrating player on the team.  It needs to be said:  had a chance to win the game at the line and failed.  At least he didn't miss both I guess.

Team:  Some great stretches of basketball mixed in with a lot of blah.  Giving up as many dunks and lay-ins as the Blazers did should make them embarassed and angry.  Instead, it doesn't seem to bother them at all.  Maybe that's the most disheartening thing.  Throw in getting out-rebounded again, and a poor shooting % again, mix in a little 70% FT shooting, and it adds up to another disappointing home loss in a very imnportant game.  I could tell it was important because the Nuggets acted like it was.

by leeroyjenkins on Feb 5, 2008 7:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

When it comes to determining whether
the glass is half full or half empty,

we can count on you to be the "glass is full of piss (sorry rat) and it really doesn't matter, because it's broken, and look, the baby has picked up a sliver and is about to swallow it" guy.

by timg56 on Feb 5, 2008 7:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If I were you
I'd just quit being a Blazer fan. Since this team doesn't seem to care and plays like blah. How can you support a team like that?

tongue-in-cheek

The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 5, 2008 9:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Now guys
he didn't say anything that inflammatory or untrue.  Perhaps you are reacting to past posts?  People do have a right to criticize and point out flaws (as I do also) without folks getting cranky.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 5, 2008 9:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was just joking
(hence the "tongue-in-cheek" reference)

But yeah, I'll simmer down. :)

The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 6, 2008 12:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Melo cheap shot!
I think the NBA needs to take a look at the 3rd quarter foul on Melo, when he closed out on Webster at the 3-point line, arms straight out at full speed he pushed webster's left knee as he was in the air! That was a total cheap shot and very very dangerous. As a whole, I think the NBA needs to put a stop to players stepping under the legs of jump shooters, the Nuggets did that all night long.
2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Feb 5, 2008 7:44 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nice Call into 1080 Dave.
I can tell Dawson likes it when your on.
The Rose Garden is our House.

by JTDuck22 on Feb 5, 2008 8:43 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

i'm bummed
i'm usually positive, but this loss bummed me out. i do not like (or losing to) the nuggets. leroy may be harsh. but he has a point(s). facts are stubborn things.

by rburg on Feb 5, 2008 8:44 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Steve Javie
Hello, my name is Tom and I live in Honolulu, HI. I just would like to say that the Portland Trail Blazers were cheated throughout the entire game by the referees. There were numerous penalties that were not called on the Denver Nuggets and it was very clear to see on the replays. I have never seen a game where there were no penalties called when they were made. I really think that the Portland Trail Balzers should have had a better chance or FAIR chance at winning last night's game. But that's okay, they are nice guys and I like them.
"I knew a guy who was dyslexic. He was also cross-eyed. So everything came out right." Tummler from Gummo (1997)

by tominhawaii on Feb 5, 2008 11:34 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Don't think its an anomaly either.
It seems to happen to the blazers a lot.  The refs don't seem to respect the blazers as a franchise and blame it on the players.  I will be writing to the NBA about it and hopefully others would to.  If they haven't been getting the boos at the Rose Garden as a sign then I am going to have to talk to their boss.  We have a freakin all-star and he doesn't get the calls at the end of the knick game but lucky we won because he is an all-star.
Its a marathon, not a sprint.

by theanomaly777 on Feb 5, 2008 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Even Keel
Thanks for the perspective Dave. I went back and looked at what I thought would make for a great season, and I only had one thing: EFFORT. We were down by 17 points at one point and came back to take the lead. How can anyone not like that? Win or lose, the effort was there. If we keep building on that and not get down mentally, this will be a great season regardless of the final record.

by Steve The Hedge on Feb 5, 2008 11:36 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

You're right
Effort is not mentioned enough.  I remember seeing Blazer games in the 1970s where things would go bad and the team would deflate like a balloon in a shootout. And not just the Blazers -- NBA history is replete with teams and players who don't know what to do when they get down except give up. This team never does that. They've seldom been blown out this season, which speaks extremely well for them.

As for Jarret, there's nothing wrong with him that more experience won't cure. A lot of teams would love to have him.

by MiledAnimal on Feb 5, 2008 1:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the credit for that has to go to Nate
for that.  His system seem too work and let us have a chance to win games even when we play like high school players.  Players need to step up and handle their business and just make open shots.  

Players need to play like they "want" to be on the championship team next year instead of thinking they deserve it.  This is not LA.  We don't cry for championships here, we earn it here.  

The opponents have been undercutting us more to stop our shots and I have noticed it too.  It pisses the whole league that we can shoot under 40% and still win the game.  When we shoot 50% its an easy victory.        Never beat yourselves in TO and no breaking cardinal rules and we should be alright.

Its a marathon, not a sprint.

by theanomaly777 on Feb 5, 2008 3:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Blazers Play Hard
They will all be better in a year and we won't lose very many close games like this. Effort is a very good way to desibe our Blazer team and they are young; So when they mature; IMO they will be very hard to beat.And I do agree there are good things and bad things about the way they play, But as they grow and mature there will be alot more good things.Hopefully frye will take it upon himself to rebound better I mean maybe we win if he even gets five or six rebounds.I think as a power forword he should be up around  eight, nine or ten. But for the most part everybody gave good effort.And thats a plus.Remember they are still the surpise of the NBA. IMO GO BLAZERS:::::::::::!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by billyjoejack on Feb 5, 2008 5:57 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Screen_shot_2009-11-03_at_9
Junk Drawer 11/22/09 - Your Greatest Fear
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Who has the best hair in the NBA?
Blazers_small
Mr. McMillan, meet Reality.
Small
From Benefit of the Doubt to Just Plain Doubt.
Images-2_small
At what point do we admit we are being out-coached?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ego, Selfishness, Superstars, and Perspective
Original
Start Miller and Rudy
Batum_small
Blazers Revert to 2008 Team
Small
Style vs Substance
Small
The Steve Blake Paradox
300px-color_icon_gray_svg_small
Thanksgiving Week Trade Drawer: What To Do With Andre Miller?
Small
I hate the way roy is playing

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.
FREE GREG ODEN
"It's been good for us," Oden said. "We're going to stick with it. We have...

Recent FanShots

Koponen!
Tossing Andre Miller Under the Bus
Blazers statistical scouting reports (2008-09 season)
Is this worth linking?
Buzz Cut, Mohawk or Afro? Which one is better?
Did we sign Juwanna man as our 14th guy or for 9M a year?
the key to a portland championship
Pendergraph is running at full speed and could be cleared to play by Christmas.
Bayless describes his situation on the team as "tough".
Think The Blazers Had A Bad Night? Check Out Nate Robinsons Night!

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm