What's Going On?
It's the popular question everywhere nowadays. "Why are the Blazers losing?" History tells us that the better question is, "How the heck did the Blazers win that many in December/January?" We'll let that go though. The post-streak blues add extra disappointment to the current stretch but there are still valid reasons we're not doing so well. Next time somebody asks, you can trot these out for starters.
1. We're getting outhustled.
This isn't rocket science. Even at our best we're not a dominating team. We're not going to overwhelm you with athleticism or score 110 a night. In order to be successful we have to play efficiently and then use the extra energy to get to every loose ball. That's just not happening. We're reaching and leaning. We're a step slow to everything. We haven't seen three honest floor dives in the last six weeks.
Part of this is our personality. We specialize in big, smart, multi-skilled players not all-out fireballs. Wishing we'd play with Ruben Patterson-like abandon is like asking the chess club to smash beer cans on their heads. Another huge part is just fatigue: physical, mental, emotional. I know you're sick of hearing it, but it really is that simple. One more time: these guys haven't played this many minutes with this much responsibility. It's literally more than they've ever played in their life. After you read this go outside and run as far as you've ever run in one stretch. Then add another 40% to that. You know what? You can't. They're professional athletes so they can do a reasonable job of it, but they're going to be at a serious disadvantage against other professional athletes who have done it before. Unless you're a freak of nature you don't win your first marathon. These guys aren't going to either. Every contested ball that falls into the opponent's hands or out of bounds (which is most of them) testifies to that.
2. We're missing our outside shots.
One glance at the scores from December through February will tell you that multiple things are going wrong with our offense. During the period when we won 17 out of 18 we topped 100 points 11 times. We have done it only 3 times since, all three of those overtime contests. Our inability to hit from the perimeter is one of the main culprits.
As analysts from coast to coast have pointed out we are basically a jump-shooting team. When you start missing your bread and butter you're in trouble.
More than that, the jumper is our key to spreading the floor. We don't have a post player who can bull his way through to the basket and score. In fact we don't have a lot of great one-on-one players at all. We need space for our cutters and drivers in order to get any kind of easy shots, motion, or decisive passes. Those things have been lacking lately.
Those extra points from the three-pointers didn't hurt either. We play a ton of close games. The 3-4 points extra from canning threes rather than twos make a big difference.
Why are we missing from outside? James Jones is injured. Our other smalls who depend on range are inconsistent. Jump shots are the first thing to go when you get fatigued. They're also the easiest shot for opponents to bother. Wrap it all together and we're in trouble.
3. We've lost our free throw advantage.
Earlier in the season we were getting more, and hitting more, free throws than our opponent by a margin of 3-4 per game. We still have an advantage on the year but it's down to barely 1 attempt more per game and less than 1 more free throw made per game. Keep in mind for the gap to have narrowed that precipitously we have to have run quite a deficit recently. These are yet more of those critical extra points we're missing out on.
Again this can be partially attributed to fatigue. Physical fatigue causes us to commit more fouls (slow to defend) and draw fewer ourselves (less hard driving). Mental fatigue contributes to misses at the line.
4. Our spacing and communication have gone south.
One of the beautiful things earlier in the season was watching the ballet-like grace with which this team played on both ends of the court. That's not happening now. The off-ball movement is intermittent. We're gathering defenders in precisely the areas we need to clear. Part of this is the aforementioned lack of outside shooting. But another part is we're not reacting to each other well on offense. The most successful plays are turning out to be the one-on-one plays from Brandon, Lamarcus, and Travis. Everybody else ends up standing and watching, or worse...drawing their defenders right down into the play.
The same is true on defense. We always depended on team defense requiring rotation and help. That means a lot of attention and a lot of talking. Neither seem to be happening. We're letting drivers inside uncontested and exposing our big men, who are also rotating late. We're requiring three guys to stop a player that should have been stymied by one or two (if we stop him at all). This puts us deeply out of position for rebounds and also out of position to defend the inevitable second shot.
Again, we're not a team stocked with dominating athletes. If we don't help each other out to the maximum extent possible we suffer.
5. We're paying the price for a lack of rebounding.
You can buck the odds for a while, but not forever. Losing the rebounding battle night after night will eventually catch up to you because you won't generate enough possessions and you won't be able to aggressively prosecute those possessions. In this sense we're like the Vegas slot machine jockeys who won big but played a little too long.
6. Gimmicks have a shelf life.
We have employed a lot of interesting tricks this year to cover up basic weaknesses, especially on defense. In the NBA the zone is pretty much a gimmick. Switching on every screen is a gimmick as well. They're good as surprise tactics but a steady diet ruins their effectiveness. The league has solved us and we have still not solved our weaknesses.
You can hear the echoes of this every time Mike and Mike talk about the Joel Przybilla/Channing Frye debate. The exact words are, "Nate is substituting for [offense/defense] here." If you have to utter these words it means you're lacking something no matter which way you go. The only long-term solution is to have more players who don't force you to make such decisions and thus employ gimmicks to cover them. Or (cough) get one of those special players who covers a multitude of sins...
7. We're dying by the sword we lived by.
During the streak we looked like we knew we had a chance to win every game. Indeed, we'd often find ourselves within 5 or 6 in the fourth and pull out the amazing come-from-behind victory. But you can only fool with come-from-behind for so long before it bites you. Now we find ourselves equally behind but have lost the swagger that allowed us to crawl back. Instead of "behind and then win" (Go Travis!) we get "behind and then behinder". We never did learn how to translate that inspired fourth-quarter play into not getting behind in the first place.
8. We haven't jelled at the same rate as the best teams.
This team has great chemistry. This team is unselfish. But this team still falls apart when Options A and B aren't available. If we were a bathroom we'd have magnificent tile with golden inlay but there would be plenty of cracks running around it. Plain old linoleum with proper filling is going to look better. This wasn't necessarily true at the beginning of the year. Plenty of teams were still settling in and finding their way. Most of the veteran squads have found theirs. We're still making November mistakes in February. Which leads us to the final big reason we're struggling...
9. It's the opposition too.
One of the common ways we fool ourselves--team and fans alike--is acting and speaking as if everything is in our control. The number of times you hear a player say, "They were just better than we were" is dwarfed by the number of times you hear them say, "We didn't do X, Y, and Z and we let them do P, Q, and R." This is true even if everybody and their uncle knew going in that the talent disparity was overwhelming and the team would probably lose.
An Obvious Truth: We're playing tougher teams now and will continue to do so as we face our Western Conference mates almost exclusively during the latter part of the season.
A Less-Obvious But Also Important Truth: Most good teams play tougher, harder, and more focused in the latter months of the season when the playoff races are starting to take shape than they did early on. They're not going to let you have that critical six-minute run that slipped by before Christmas. They need that six minutes so they can catch up to the team right ahead of them.
Put all of these together and you have a reasonable synopsis of what's going on. About half of them are solveable. The other half, though, are not. They're matters of experience, talent, or other things beyond our control at this point in time. It's worthy to note that even the uncontrollable half of these issues could very well have caused us to lose had we played perfectly in all of the ways we could control. We might not be losing quite so much, nor by quite so much, but neither are we a San Antonio-like team hamstrung by our own choices.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
37 comments
Comments
It hurts but it's true
Being in and falling out of the playoff hunt is a bummer, even if we were never 'sposed to be there. But being in that atmosphere is another learning lesson, as is seeing what the real teams do to kick it to another level as the season goes along.
You know, this is a strange but fun season. Most years we'd STILL be in the playoffs, even with how bad we've played lately. It just so happens we're doing this during a year where 9 teams could win 50 games in the West. It might seem unlucky, but will work out in the long run. We still get a good lottery pick, add another great asset for KP to work with, and we keep improving. The Blazers win either way.
I take solace in that fact (that we'd usually be in the playoffs). And since we won't win it all till we got Oden up n' going, I can't mind too much if we don't make the playoffs; especially if we can still feel good about our record AND get a lottery pick.
Imagine how those East coast teams that make the playoffs in the East with a worse record than us and don't get a good player in the draft feel. We're rich already and will just get richer, while they go get more mediocre. WE WIN HAHAHAHA THEY LOSE.
Losing sucks a lot, but this season will never be a failure. That's all that matters. I love this team.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 23, 2008 1:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's what Mortimer is saying.
But, no one is claiming that this season is the best year ever. Or even that it is one of the better years. But in regards to the expectations at the beginning of the year, we are finally falling down to where we expected to be. Meeting expectations should hardly be considered a failure. And given what we've been through for the last few years, a little celebrating is in order, even while missing the playoffs.
Yes, we're losing, and sometimes, especially lately, badly. But this season in its entirety has been something that Blazer fans have been missing for a long time. The moments of "Wow!" have been significantly greater this year. Don't let the inevitable "Aww!" moments take away from that. To use a (dangerous) political analogy, it is things like this that separate the social conservatives from the economic conservatives.
by T Darkstar on Feb 23, 2008 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That last statement was completely divisive.
by T Darkstar on Feb 23, 2008 8:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good work, Morty
by jorga on Feb 23, 2008 8:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, Mortimer
Good thing you're in LA
by Section323 on Feb 23, 2008 1:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mine too. In my mind Morty looks just like Rudy.
I'm sorry about your diary.
Mortimer
by annthefan on Feb 23, 2008 2:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha, me too!
by Section323 on Feb 24, 2008 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WAIT!
DARN YOU Mortimer! DARN YOU all to BLAZES!
Stupid B.E. all-star voting.
:::kicks empty soup can down street:::
--Dave
by Dave on Feb 24, 2008 12:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't worry, Dave
But I can't have a crush on you, you went to Grant. That would just be wrong.
by Section323 on Feb 24, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't even realize I was being liked!
Don't worry Dave, I'll always be the Harold Miner to your Michael Jordan. Plus, I'm easily wooed, and the crushes won't be unrequited much longer. I'm currently leaving my fiance for Section323, annthefan, AND Jorga so soon our love will supplant Sergio and Becky Harlow's as the romance for the ages.
Luckily, I make Rudy Fernandez look like Al Jefferson's ugly brother on crack. I am devastatingly handsome. Plus, with my lucky headband on, I transcend attractiveness and become a God-like figure able to create and destroy on a whim. I'm KP-like.
In addition to Section323, annthefan, and Jorga, I'll marry anyone else willing to give me a compliment so be sure to get those compliments in by the deadline so we can get the paperwork prepared and notarized.
Thank you, and Godspeed.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 25, 2008 12:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel the need point out
Plus I'm not sharing, so forget it!
I guess you'll have to stick with your original plan, Mortimer.
by Section323 on Feb 25, 2008 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did I mention
--Dave
by Dave on Feb 25, 2008 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Morty, Ooh Morty
"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblowby Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 26, 2008 12:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't the Blazers sprint back on D?
That at least seems like one thing that is extremely simple to fix that would save you 8 or 10 points a game.
There are others too. Let's face it, with the exception of Brandon who looks like he can't stand any of his teammates right now, the other players don't have high basketball IQ's. They haven't made the adjustments to counter the adjustments other teams have made.
by leeroyjenkins on Feb 23, 2008 6:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oh and the Sonics wanted the game more
by leeroyjenkins on Feb 23, 2008 6:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree on the BB IQs
But even Brandon has seemed that way lately, which lends credence to the fatigue theory of the suckiness.
by Section323 on Feb 23, 2008 1:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We needed a trade
by danielfarrell on Feb 23, 2008 7:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It was clear a month ago...
But the Blazers were coming off of their freakish 13 game streak, and KP loudly and proudly announced that he's sitting pat... And the legion of Blazer fans said "YAAAAAAY FOR KP!!!!!!"
Wrong.
Now we get to see if the same team can have the longest winning streak AND losing streak in the same season. Wouldn't that be something? The Sonics was a game that had me sweating, but the streak LIVES!!!
GO BLAZERS!
by timbo on Feb 23, 2008 11:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was incommunicado...
t
by timbo on Feb 24, 2008 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, you mean one win isn't a streak?
by Section323 on Feb 24, 2008 12:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You mentioned, but didn't comment on
The team was as high as the fans during December. Nate refused to let them talk about the playoffs, but you know they THOUGHT about them. Then they lost a few games. Then they lost some more. The fans started asking questions. As "pretend team shrink" I can tell you that the players also started asking questions. Self-doubt started to creep in, especially among the more emotionally vulnerable (can you say Webster, Trout, and Jack?) Then JJ33 went down and The White Unit suddenly became "the bench" again. They weren't able to take up where the starters left off. If the starters had a bad game - that was all she wrote. When was the last time the bench outscored the starters? A five game losing streak is emotionally draining on everyone.
The team is as crushed as the fans are. It's simply a case of all of us coming up against reality. This team is NOT a great team. We can be good at times, we can have great moments and occasionally great games. The streak was a freak.
We (team and fans) have to emotionally return to the beginning of the season when all we were expecting to see was growth. We caught a glimpse of the future during December. Hold that thought.
by jorga on Feb 23, 2008 8:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
ding ding ding goes the trolly
by ratbastird on Feb 23, 2008 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"The streak was a freak." - jorga
I have been able to watch the last two Games and am able to comment on what I SAW for a change. The main one being momentary (split-second)indecesion by our Players, on both ends of the Court. That split-second lost our chance to compete and the Game.
"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblowby Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 23, 2008 10:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dave...
by Dr Dave on Feb 23, 2008 8:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
James Jones
I think he's one piece that was really important when we were winning, beyond his contribution on the stat sheet. Yes, his shooting was a huge part, but also some intangibles when he was out on the floor. Bring that back, and maybe some of these other things start to fall in place.
Look, we can't point at any one player that is on the court and say that individual is doing it. This is widespread -- everyone on the squad (even Brandon, due to fatigue) is a crapshoot on any given night. I think Jones returning might be a catalyst to getting the squad to come together again.
by BrailleTaser on Feb 23, 2008 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why did Nate shorten the rotation?
I think it would help the team if they played a few minutes less but could play harder. We have a lot of depth and don't lose much when we go to our bench. Detroit is full of veterans but this year they're playing their starters less so they don't break down at the end of the season. If our guys are rested and have more energy to spend then, well, they'd be more...stay with me here... energetic, which is out whole problem.
by terryisntbald on Feb 23, 2008 11:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We're just not that good.
In some ways, the streak has been a bit damaging because fans had their expectations raised to unrealistic levels, and have grown to over-esteem our players.
The biggest example of that is the fan outcry that I think led KP to turn down Devin Harris and Brandon Bass for Trout, Frye, and Jack.
I like Trout, but the truth is that for as much as he's hit game winners, we maybe wouldn't have been in those close games if our overall talent level were higher. Trout's a tweener forward who is too suspect on defense to match up to the dynamic SFs of the league and too unproductive inside and on the boards to be a legitimate starting PF. He hits two game winners and all of a sudden he's untouchable for a huge upgrade at PG? A PG who's directly out of central casting as the perfect backcourt partner for Roy? Argh.
Or all the insane reactions to the LMA for Conley/Miller trade idea -- listen, again, I like LMA but he's pretty soft for a NBA PF. He's developing like a Antwan Jamison with a shakier jumpshot. shrug Maybe he'll surprise us all by finding some stones this summer but he's been labeled soft for two years of college and another two years of the NBA, not sure why we'd expect anything different at this point.
Jack -- well, I don't need to pile on here, since he's the only one who doesn't get the benefit of irrational fan love. Actually he's a little underrated around here, but not hugely underrated -- there's only so much you can love a slashing undersized SG with a streaky jumper who's not athletic enough to get above the rim to avoid shotblockers, and who has a tendency to turn the ball over.
Jones -- Can you say "fluke"? He had an incredible hot streak, but it was still just a streak. Don't expect him to stay up around 50% from 3, when his career average before this year was around 37%.
Blake -- Doesn't make a lot of mistakes (although he made quite a few in the first Sonics game), but doesn't bring a lot to the table either. Not a playmaker, and a liability on defense.
Martell -- still an enigma wrapped in a mystery. For a guy who's supposed to be in the league for his shooting, he's got poor averages everywhere. The culprit is that his windup is so slow that he needs more time than most to get a good shot off. But he's terrible at creating space. Can he develop those skills? I have no idea.
by howlingfantods on Feb 23, 2008 11:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I find it difficult to believe...
by timg56 on Feb 25, 2008 6:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you want us to get Kevin Love?
Nice cryptic message Dave, by referring to 1 Pet 4:8 "... LOVE covers a multitude of sins."
Although, honestly Dave, I think Oden is that player. Geez, I didn't know you were such a Love homer...
by TimG on Feb 23, 2008 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Very good line Dave..
LMAO!
by ColoradoBlazerFan on Feb 23, 2008 11:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We need to turn this around
by jksnake99 on Feb 23, 2008 3:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Another thing
Also, I know we want to establish LMA early, but I think Nate's overdoing it. I think we start the first quarter dumping it to LMA all quarter, and all the guys start getting in the habit of standing around and watching.
Remember that the best part of the streak happened with LMA on the sidelines. The streak happened because of very good offensive efficiency created by lots of ball movement, penetration, and bodies moving. When we go to the "dump the ball into LMA" offense to start every game, the ball isn't moving and people aren't moving.
by howlingfantods on Feb 23, 2008 3:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'd put in my two cents
Speaking of which, am I nuts to think the Blazers have a shot vs the Celtics tomorrow? Sure, the Celtics have a much better squad at this stage, and they're mad as Hornets (no pun intended) at being 0-3 on this trip. But they ARE a little out of sync, and they're sure to view the Blazers game as a snooze-fest. I smell an upset (if faintly--like the odor of yesterday's cooking).
by hurryup09 on Feb 23, 2008 4:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Horseracing and the NBA Season
Everyone talks about the NBA season being a long grind with a need for pace management. The Blazers began the season faltering out of the gate thus getting off to a slow start. The coach employed the whip coming out of the first turn hoping to get the horse in better position. But the horse responded more dramatically than expected, racing down the backstretch and taking a brief lead. The coach didn't use the whip again and even employed a 10-man rotation hoping to preserve some effort for the end. But the horse having used so much energy in the backstretch is now falling back in the final turn and the prospects of a second wind for the homestretch are looking dim.
While some might ask if the jockey should have known better than to employ the whip so early, it should be noted that the intent was only to put the horse in better position. Those who know say the horse is very young and hasn't run many races to this point, so the jockey is still figuring out what the horse is capable of doing and how the horse will respond to given situations.
Those who know also insist this horse has a bright future and with more experience will soon be making regular visits to the winner's circle.
by bbfred on Feb 24, 2008 11:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
oooOOOHH!
Thank you.
"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblowby Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 24, 2008 11:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
He said as he walked away from the ...
by timg56 on Feb 25, 2008 6:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















