Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


What's Going On?

It's the popular question everywhere nowadays.  "Why are the Blazers losing?"  History tells us that the better question is, "How the heck did the Blazers win that many in December/January?"  We'll let that go though.  The post-streak blues add extra disappointment to the current stretch but there are still valid reasons we're not doing so well.  Next time somebody asks, you can trot these out for starters.

1.  We're getting outhustled.

This isn't rocket science. Even at our best we're not a dominating team.  We're not going to overwhelm you with athleticism or score 110 a night.  In order to be successful we have to play efficiently and then use the extra energy to get to every loose ball.  That's just not happening. We're reaching and leaning.  We're a step slow to everything.  We haven't seen three honest floor dives in the last six weeks.

Part of this is our personality.  We specialize in big, smart, multi-skilled players not all-out fireballs.  Wishing we'd play with Ruben Patterson-like abandon is like asking the chess club to smash beer cans on their heads.  Another huge part is just fatigue:  physical, mental, emotional.  I know you're sick of hearing it, but it really is that simple.  One more time:  these guys haven't played this many minutes with this much responsibility.  It's literally more than they've ever played in their life.  After you read this go outside and run as far as you've ever run in one stretch.  Then add another 40% to that.  You know what?  You can't.  They're professional athletes so they can do a reasonable job of it, but they're going to be at a serious disadvantage against other professional athletes who have done it before.  Unless you're a freak of nature you don't win your first marathon.  These guys aren't going to either.  Every contested ball that falls into the opponent's hands or out of bounds (which is most of them) testifies to that.

2.  We're missing our outside shots.

One glance at the scores from December through February will tell you that multiple things are going wrong with our offense.  During the period when we won 17 out of 18 we topped 100 points 11 times.  We have done it only 3 times since, all three of those overtime contests.  Our inability to hit from the perimeter is one of the main culprits.

As analysts from coast to coast have pointed out we are basically a jump-shooting team.  When you start missing your bread and butter you're in trouble.

More than that, the jumper is our key to spreading the floor.  We don't have a post player who can bull his way through to the basket and score. In fact we don't have a lot of great one-on-one players at all.  We need space for our cutters and drivers in order to get any kind of easy shots, motion, or decisive passes.  Those things have been lacking lately.

Those extra points from the three-pointers didn't hurt either.  We play a ton of close games.  The 3-4 points extra from canning threes rather than twos make a big difference.

Why are we missing from outside?  James Jones is injured.  Our other smalls who depend on range are inconsistent.  Jump shots are the first thing to go when you get fatigued.  They're also the easiest shot for opponents to bother. Wrap it all together and we're in trouble.

3.  We've lost our free throw advantage.

Earlier in the season we were getting more, and hitting more, free throws than our opponent by a margin of 3-4 per game.  We still have an advantage on the year but it's down to barely 1 attempt more per game and less than 1 more free throw made per game.  Keep in mind for the gap to have narrowed that precipitously we have to have run quite a deficit recently.  These are yet more of those critical extra points we're missing out on.

Again this can be partially attributed to fatigue.  Physical fatigue causes us to commit more fouls (slow to defend) and draw fewer ourselves (less hard driving).  Mental fatigue contributes to misses at the line.

4.  Our spacing and communication have gone south.

One of the beautiful things earlier in the season was watching the ballet-like grace with which this team played on both ends of the court.  That's not happening now.  The off-ball movement is intermittent.  We're gathering defenders in precisely the areas we need to clear.  Part of this is the aforementioned lack of outside shooting.  But another part is we're not reacting to each other well on offense. The most successful plays are turning out to be the one-on-one plays from Brandon, Lamarcus, and Travis.  Everybody else ends up standing and watching, or worse...drawing their defenders right down into the play.

The same is true on defense.  We always depended on team defense requiring rotation and help.  That means a lot of attention and a lot of talking.  Neither seem to be happening.  We're letting drivers inside uncontested and exposing our big men, who are also rotating late.  We're requiring three guys to stop a player that should have been stymied by one or two (if we stop him at all).  This puts us deeply out of position for rebounds and also out of position to defend the inevitable second shot.

Again, we're not a team stocked with dominating athletes.  If we don't help each other out to the maximum extent possible we suffer.

5.  We're paying the price for a lack of rebounding.

You can buck the odds for a while, but not forever.  Losing the rebounding battle night after night will eventually catch up to you because you won't generate enough possessions and you won't be able to aggressively prosecute those possessions.  In this sense we're like the Vegas slot machine jockeys who won big but played a little too long.

6.  Gimmicks have a shelf life.

We have employed a lot of interesting tricks this year to cover up basic weaknesses, especially on defense.  In the NBA the zone is pretty much a gimmick. Switching on every screen is a gimmick as well.  They're good as surprise tactics but a steady diet ruins their effectiveness.  The league has solved us and we have still not solved our weaknesses.

You can hear the echoes of this every time Mike and Mike talk about the Joel Przybilla/Channing Frye debate.  The exact words are, "Nate is substituting for [offense/defense] here."  If you have to utter these words it means you're lacking something no matter which way you go.  The only long-term solution is to have more players who don't force you to make such decisions and thus employ gimmicks to cover them. Or (cough) get one of those special players who covers a multitude of sins...

7. We're dying by the sword we lived by.

During the streak we looked like we knew we had a chance to win every game.  Indeed, we'd often find ourselves within 5 or 6 in the fourth and pull out the amazing come-from-behind victory.  But you can only fool with come-from-behind for so long before it bites you.  Now we find ourselves equally behind but have lost the swagger that allowed us to crawl back.  Instead of "behind and then win" (Go Travis!) we get "behind and then behinder".  We never did learn how to translate that inspired fourth-quarter play into not getting behind in the first place.

8.  We haven't jelled at the same rate as the best teams.

This team has great chemistry.  This team is unselfish.  But this team still falls apart when Options A and B aren't available.  If we were a bathroom we'd have magnificent tile with golden inlay but there would be plenty of cracks running around it.  Plain old linoleum with proper filling is going to look better.  This wasn't necessarily true at the beginning of the year.  Plenty of teams were still settling in and finding their way.  Most of the veteran squads have found theirs.  We're still making November mistakes in February.  Which leads us to the final big reason we're struggling...

9.  It's the opposition too.

One of the common ways we fool ourselves--team and fans alike--is acting and speaking as if everything is in our control.  The number of times you hear a player say, "They were just better than we were" is dwarfed by the number of times you hear them say, "We didn't do X, Y, and Z and we let them do P, Q, and R."  This is true even if everybody and their uncle knew going in that the talent disparity was overwhelming and the team would probably lose.

An Obvious Truth:  We're playing tougher teams now and will continue to do so as we face our Western Conference mates almost exclusively during the latter part of the season.

A Less-Obvious But Also Important Truth:  Most good teams play tougher, harder, and more focused in the latter months of the season when the playoff races are starting to take shape than they did early on.  They're not going to let you have that critical six-minute run that slipped by before Christmas.  They need that six minutes so they can catch up to the team right ahead of them.

Put all of these together and you have a reasonable synopsis of what's going on.  About half of them are solveable.  The other half, though, are not.  They're matters of experience, talent, or other things beyond our control at this point in time.  It's worthy to note that even the uncontrollable half of these issues could very well have caused us to lose had we played perfectly in all of the ways we could control.  We might not be losing quite so much, nor by quite so much, but neither are we a San Antonio-like team hamstrung by our own choices.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs | Comment 37 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It hurts but it's true
This year is still a rousing success and proves we have the best future out of anyone in the league.  Our main guys got a full season under their belt, really see what the NBA is about and what demands it places on your body, and will be better equipped for the future.  We got the right key players, we just need time.

Being in and falling out of the playoff hunt is a bummer, even if we were never 'sposed to be there.  But being in that atmosphere is another learning lesson, as is seeing what the real teams do to kick it to another level as the season goes along.  

You know, this is a strange but fun season.  Most years we'd STILL be in the playoffs, even with how bad we've played lately.  It just so happens we're doing this during a year where 9 teams could win 50 games in the West.  It might seem unlucky, but will work out in the long run.  We still get a good lottery pick, add another great asset for KP to work with, and we keep improving.  The Blazers win either way.

I take solace in that fact (that we'd usually be in the playoffs).  And since we won't win it all till we got Oden up n' going, I can't mind too much if we don't make the playoffs; especially if we can still feel good about our record AND get a lottery pick.

Imagine how those East coast teams that make the playoffs in the East with a worse record than us and don't get a good player in the draft feel.  We're rich already and will just get richer, while they go get more mediocre.  WE WIN HAHAHAHA THEY LOSE.

Losing sucks a lot, but this season will never be a failure.  That's all that matters.  I love this team.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Feb 23, 2008 1:52 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think that's what Mortimer is saying.
First, I should preface this by saying that I took your comments to be sarcasm. If by some off chance you were serious, I apologize now.

But, no one is claiming that this season is the best year ever. Or even that it is one of the better years. But in regards to the expectations at the beginning of the year, we are finally falling down to where we expected to be. Meeting expectations should hardly be considered a failure. And given what we've been through for the last few years, a little celebrating is in order, even while missing the playoffs.

Yes, we're losing, and sometimes, especially lately, badly. But this season in its entirety has been something that Blazer fans have been missing for a long time. The moments of "Wow!" have been significantly greater this year. Don't let the inevitable "Aww!" moments take away from that.  To use a (dangerous) political analogy, it is things like this that separate the social conservatives from the economic conservatives.

"I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." -P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Feb 23, 2008 8:10 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That last statement was completely divisive.
And unclear who is what. Perhaps it's better that way.
"I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." -P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Feb 23, 2008 8:12 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good work, Morty
Another gold star for you today.
"...people are young until they aren't. And even then they're usually young a little more yet." - Dave, February 21.

by jorga on Feb 23, 2008 8:38 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ah, Mortimer
My crush on you just keeps growing.
Good thing you're in LA

by Section323 on Feb 23, 2008 1:10 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha, me too!
Please don't ever post a photo, Morty.  I like the illusion.

by Section323 on Feb 24, 2008 11:59 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

WAIT!
You're supposed to develop unrequited crushes on the blogger!  The BLOGGER!!!

DARN YOU Mortimer!  DARN YOU all to BLAZES!

Stupid B.E. all-star voting.  

:::kicks empty soup can down street:::

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 24, 2008 12:12 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't worry, Dave
In my head you look just like Josh McRoberts. Pre-haircut shaggy-haired Josh.

But I can't have a crush on you, you went to Grant. That would just be wrong.

by Section323 on Feb 24, 2008 6:51 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah
But Wilson GUYS were dweebs and jerks.  Much as I hated to admit it, Wilson GIRLS were usually all pretty and had perfectly-styled hair and stuff.

Sick, that.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 24, 2008 9:43 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I didn't even realize I was being liked!
Why didn't I check comments here sooner?  I'm a SUPERSTAR NOW.

Don't worry Dave, I'll always be the Harold Miner to your Michael Jordan.  Plus, I'm easily wooed, and the crushes won't be unrequited much longer.  I'm currently leaving my fiance for  Section323, annthefan, AND Jorga so soon our love will supplant Sergio and Becky Harlow's as the romance for the ages.

Luckily, I make Rudy Fernandez look like Al Jefferson's ugly brother on crack.  I am devastatingly handsome.  Plus, with my lucky headband on, I transcend attractiveness and become a God-like figure able to create and destroy on a whim.  I'm KP-like.

In addition to Section323, annthefan, and Jorga, I'll marry anyone else willing to give me a compliment so be sure to get those compliments in by the deadline so we can get the paperwork prepared and notarized.

Thank you, and Godspeed.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Feb 25, 2008 12:25 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I feel the need point out
that Jorga didn't express a crush, she just gave you a gold star.

Plus I'm not sharing, so forget it!
I guess you'll have to stick with your original plan, Mortimer.

by Section323 on Feb 25, 2008 5:39 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did I mention
those pretty-haired Wilson girls are fickle?

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 25, 2008 6:11 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Morty, Ooh Morty
What about me?
"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 26, 2008 12:24 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why don't the Blazers sprint back on D?
They give up at least 4 or 5 easy baskets per game simply because one of the Blazers gets beat back down the floor.  

That at least seems like one thing that is extremely simple to fix that would save you 8 or 10 points a game.

There are others too.  Let's face it, with the exception of Brandon who looks like he can't stand any of his teammates right now, the other players don't have high basketball IQ's.  They haven't made the adjustments to counter the adjustments other teams have made.  

by leeroyjenkins on Feb 23, 2008 6:49 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh and the Sonics wanted the game more
Hard to believe considering the Blazers needed it really badly.  

by leeroyjenkins on Feb 23, 2008 6:52 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree on the BB IQs
sometimes they seem dense.
But even Brandon has seemed that way lately, which lends credence to the fatigue theory of the suckiness.

by Section323 on Feb 23, 2008 1:11 PM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We needed a trade
I feel like we needed a decent trade before the deadline to breath some life into this team.  We feel stagnate.  And I'm not talking the stupid Memphis deal, I'm talking making a trade for a Devin Harris/Danny Granger type.  We need one more high level player in our starting lineup right now and then another(Oden) to follow.

by danielfarrell on Feb 23, 2008 7:15 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was clear a month ago...
....... that there needed to be a big trade made for somebody to help Joel at the low post.

But the Blazers were coming off of their freakish 13 game streak, and KP loudly and proudly announced that he's sitting pat... And the legion of Blazer fans said "YAAAAAAY FOR KP!!!!!!"

Wrong.

Now we get to see if the same team can have the longest winning streak AND losing streak in the same season. Wouldn't that be something? The Sonics was a game that had me sweating, but the streak LIVES!!!

GO BLAZERS!

"You don't live by the jumpshot, you die by the jumpshot." ---Charles Barkley, 2/7/08

by timbo on Feb 23, 2008 11:37 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was incommunicado...
........ on the Las Vegas strip for a few days and am DISTRAUGHT to learn the streak was ended before the new streak started...

t

"You don't live by the jumpshot, you die by the jumpshot." ---Charles Barkley, 2/7/08

by timbo on Feb 24, 2008 9:53 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You mentioned, but didn't comment on
Emotional Fatigue.  I know that some posters absolutely refuse to accept "youth" and "lack of experience" as reasons for losses, and many of those will also not accept fatigue.  I'm not among them.

The team was as high as the fans during December. Nate refused to let them talk about the playoffs, but you know they THOUGHT about them.  Then they lost a few games.  Then they lost some more.  The fans started asking questions.  As "pretend team shrink" I can tell you that the players also started asking questions.  Self-doubt started to creep in, especially among the more emotionally  vulnerable (can you say Webster, Trout, and Jack?) Then JJ33 went down and The White Unit suddenly became "the bench" again.  They weren't able to take up where the starters left off.  If the starters had a bad game - that was all she wrote.  When was the last time the bench outscored the starters?  A five game losing streak is emotionally draining on everyone.

The team is as crushed as the fans are.  It's simply a case of all of us coming up against reality.  This team is NOT a great team.  We can be good at times, we can have great moments and occasionally great games.  The streak was a freak.  

We (team and fans) have to emotionally return to the beginning of the season when all we were expecting to see was growth.  We caught a glimpse of the future during December.  Hold that thought.

"...people are young until they aren't. And even then they're usually young a little more yet." - Dave, February 21.

by jorga on Feb 23, 2008 8:36 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ding ding ding goes the trolly
when you're right, you're right.
"No way. I love this town. We're gonna bring back the glory years. These boys are my boys. This is my team and my town." - Greg Oden when asked about leaving.

by ratbastird on Feb 23, 2008 10:16 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"The streak was a freak." - jorga
Great "Sound Bite"! It sticks with ya and keeps ringing in my head.

I have been able to watch the last two Games and am able to comment on what I SAW for a change. The main one being momentary (split-second)indecesion by our Players, on both ends of the Court. That split-second lost our chance to compete and the Game.

"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 23, 2008 10:37 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dave...
...you're doing a bathroom remodel, aren't you...?
"The early bird gets the worm. The second mouse gets the cheese." Don Monette

by Dr Dave on Feb 23, 2008 8:46 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

James Jones
Jones out at the beginning of the season, we lose.  He comes back, we win.  He goes out, we lose.  He comes back, ...?

I think he's one piece that was really important when we were winning, beyond his contribution on the stat sheet.  Yes, his shooting was a huge part, but also some intangibles when he was out on the floor.  Bring that back, and maybe some of these other things start to fall in place.

Look, we can't point at any one player that is on the court and say that individual is doing it.  This is widespread -- everyone on the squad (even Brandon, due to fatigue) is a crapshoot on any given night.  I think Jones returning might be a catalyst to getting the squad to come together again.

by BrailleTaser on Feb 23, 2008 10:07 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why did Nate shorten the rotation?
I agree that fatigue is a huge part. Except for Jack, Joel and Raef nobody on the team has ever played as many minutes as they are this year. Last night Nate played Sergio and other guys less even though we played the night before. Why not play Roy, LMA and Trout a few minutes less a night so they'll be fresher? Not just for that game for so they don't get worn down as much as the season progresses. During our winning streak we were playing 10 guys and both Roy and Outlaw would have the energy to bring us back in the 4th quarter.  

I think it would help the team if they played a few minutes less but could play harder. We have a lot of depth and don't lose much when we go to our bench. Detroit is full of veterans but this year they're playing their starters less so they don't break down at the end of the season. If our guys are rested and have more energy to spend then, well, they'd be more...stay with me here... energetic, which is out whole problem.

by terryisntbald on Feb 23, 2008 11:02 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We're just not that good.
The streak was fun and exciting, and it's been fantastic to see Roy making the leap.  But outside of Roy, our other guys just aren't very good.

In some ways, the streak has been a bit damaging because fans had their expectations raised to unrealistic levels, and have grown to over-esteem our players.

The biggest example of that is the fan outcry that I think led KP to turn down Devin Harris and Brandon Bass for Trout, Frye, and Jack.

I like Trout, but the truth is that for as much as he's hit game winners, we maybe wouldn't have been in those close games if our overall talent level were higher.  Trout's a tweener forward who is too suspect on defense to match up to the dynamic SFs of the league and too unproductive inside and on the boards to be a legitimate starting PF.  He hits two game winners and all of a sudden he's untouchable for a huge upgrade at PG?  A PG who's directly out of central casting as the perfect backcourt partner for Roy?  Argh.

Or all the insane reactions to the LMA for Conley/Miller trade idea -- listen, again, I like LMA but he's pretty soft for a NBA PF.  He's developing like a Antwan Jamison with a shakier jumpshot.  shrug  Maybe he'll surprise us all by finding some stones this summer but he's been labeled soft for two years of college and another two years of the NBA, not sure why we'd expect anything different at this point.

Jack -- well, I don't need to pile on here, since he's the only one who doesn't get the benefit of irrational fan love.  Actually he's a little underrated around here, but not hugely underrated -- there's only so much you can love a slashing undersized SG with a streaky jumper who's not athletic enough to get above the rim to avoid shotblockers, and who has a tendency to turn the ball over.

Jones -- Can you say "fluke"?  He had an incredible hot streak, but it was still just a streak.  Don't expect him to stay up around 50% from 3, when his career average before this year was around 37%.

Blake -- Doesn't make a lot of mistakes (although he made quite a few in the first Sonics game), but doesn't bring a lot to the table either.  Not a playmaker, and a liability on defense.

Martell -- still an enigma wrapped in a mystery.  For a guy who's supposed to be in the league for his shooting, he's got poor averages everywhere.  The culprit is that his windup is so slow that he needs more time than most to get a good shot off.  But he's terrible at creating space.  Can he develop those skills?  I have no idea.

by howlingfantods on Feb 23, 2008 11:18 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I find it difficult to believe...
... that the reason Pritchard failed to make the trade for Devin Harris was due to fan opinion.  

by timg56 on Feb 25, 2008 6:40 AM PST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So you want us to get Kevin Love?
"Or (cough) get one of those special players who covers a multitude of sins..."
Nice cryptic message Dave, by referring to 1 Pet 4:8 "... LOVE covers a multitude of sins."

Although, honestly Dave, I think Oden is that player. Geez, I didn't know you were such a Love homer...

by TimG on Feb 23, 2008 11:27 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Very good line Dave..
"Wishing we'd play with Ruben Patterson-like abandon is like asking the chess club to smash beer cans on their heads."

LMAO!

by ColoradoBlazerFan on Feb 23, 2008 11:52 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We need to turn this around
This season CAN still be a rousing success, but not at the rate we are playing now.  We need to get our mojo back and finish above (or at least very close) to the .500 mark.  If we tank and win 35, the number of wins would still be ok, but the whole team would be left with a bad taste in its mouth.  Its important that we close the season on a good note.

by jksnake99 on Feb 23, 2008 3:01 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Another thing
I'm pretty sure at this point that the three guard lineup isn't working for us.  Also the tightened rotations.  I'm not sure how many more games Nate's going to go this way, but I think it's clearly time for a change.

Also, I know we want to establish LMA early, but I think Nate's overdoing it.  I think we start the first quarter dumping it to LMA all quarter, and all the guys start getting in the habit of standing around and watching.

Remember that the best part of the streak happened with LMA on the sidelines.  The streak happened because of very good offensive efficiency created by lots of ball movement, penetration, and bodies moving.  When we go to the "dump the ball into LMA" offense to start every game, the ball isn't moving and people aren't moving.

by howlingfantods on Feb 23, 2008 3:56 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd put in my two cents
But between Dave and Mortimer, it's been said.  Nice job, guys.  On the positive side, next season will be golden, and there should still be some bright moments down the stretch of this campaign.  

Speaking of which, am I nuts to think the Blazers have a shot vs the Celtics tomorrow?  Sure, the Celtics have a much better squad at this stage, and they're mad as Hornets (no pun intended) at being 0-3 on this trip.  But they ARE a little out of sync, and they're sure to view the Blazers game as a snooze-fest.  I smell an upset (if faintly--like the odor of yesterday's cooking).

"Ime caught the guy in mid-air with a fist and calmly continued his dispatching of oncoming people." -Gabe Muoneke

by hurryup09 on Feb 23, 2008 4:29 PM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Horseracing and the NBA Season
Running a horserace is all about strategically keeping the horse at the right pace and in the right place at different points during the race to maximize the possibility of winning in the end.  If the horses could figure those things out themselves there would be no need for jockeys.  A shiny red mechanical apple to chase around the track would suffice.

Everyone talks about the NBA season being a long grind with a need for pace management.  The Blazers began the season faltering out of the gate thus getting off to a slow start.  The coach employed the whip coming out of the first turn hoping to get the horse in better position.  But the horse responded more dramatically than expected, racing down the backstretch and taking a brief lead.  The coach didn't use the whip again and even employed a 10-man rotation hoping to preserve some effort for the end.  But the horse having used so much energy in the backstretch is now falling back in the final turn and the prospects of a second wind for the homestretch are looking dim.

While some might ask if the jockey should have known better than to employ the whip so early, it should be noted that the intent was only to put the horse in better position.  Those who know say the horse is very young and hasn't run many races to this point, so the jockey is still figuring out what the horse is capable of doing and how the horse will respond to given situations.

Those who know also insist this horse has a bright future and with more experience will soon be making regular visits to the winner's circle.

by bbfred on Feb 24, 2008 11:29 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

oooOOOHH!
I like. Great analogy. It created a vision in my mind, as I read along.

Thank you.

"The Team with Caricature!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 24, 2008 11:57 AM PST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

100_4977_small
JD 7/5
Small
Commitment
Small
Nicolas Batum interview in REVERSE (french mag) of July
Small
HAVE WE LOST OUR MINDS
N1313394467_27679_4745_small
Hedo Turkgolu: 7 Stages of grief (now 14)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blessing in Disguise
Nike_o_small
Why not Andre Miller?
Small
Creating an Offensive Advantage
Small
Interesting take. What are your thoughts?
Small
David Lee begets a SF in the Future
Peacock_small
Dimitris Diamantidis
Small
David Lee? Nate Robinson? general Panic, what gives?
Iraq_christmas__small
Why not Roy?
Small
Here's the trade we NEED!(Wonder if Blazers will hire me?)

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Greedo Turkoglu



"E lo tolo Pritchard????"
See Ya Later Hedo! It was fun while it lasted :)
fooled us!
Hedo Rejects Deal, Ends Talks
Hedo in red and black. Bustabucket whipped out the Photoshop

Recent FanShots

Victor Claver Video Interview
They do not teach pronouns at the Toronto Sun
New Canzano column re: Hedo
Think he'd sign for veteran's minimum?
The Ron Artest Soap Opera Reviewed (by timbo)
Monty Williams might be a top candidate for Wolves
How going after Lee makes sense
Blazers strike back, switch D-League co-affiliate from Toronto to Denver
Nothing to do with basketball
Just tired of Hedo talk

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

151054601_tp_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports