Game 51 Recap: Blazers 83, Rockets 95
Hey folks, this wasn't that bad of a game. The first half was pretty nice, in fact. I had a lot better feeling after this game than after either of the last two, which surprises me because I had figured this one to be an automatic depression-inducer.
Team Observations
The very first thing we need to acknowledge is the difference Brandon Roy makes in our intangibles, most notably attitude. From moment one you could see it in every line of most every body out there. If you look at the last couple of games we moved around in the first quarter, but it was the movement of an NFL Quarterback who's lost his confidence. The Blazers got a fair amount of "happy feet"--rushing around without purpose or confidence. That gave way to eventual resignation and stagnation in the pocket (so to speak). Tonight we came out with purposeful movement and confidence. That's Brandon Roy's influence.
Also, outside of the fourth quarter, how many truly bad shots did you see us take compared to the last couple of games? That's Roy too.
I haven't seen a guy make this kind of attitudinal difference since Clyde Drexler. In the flurry of the wins and losses don't lose sight of the fact that it's a privilege to get in on the ground floor of this career. Everybody who loves the Blazers should be excited about the prospects of seeing this guy play for the next 15 years.
As far as the game goes, as I said it was a great first half considering the opponent and the situation. We played with focused, directed energy. We did a fantastic job quick-doubling Yao with our guards. Everybody's game plan includes double-teaming the big guy but it's often from across the lane and it often comes slowly. We took the guy closest to him and just jabbed right in. Did you catch those steals we poked away when he brought the ball down? We basically made him a non-factor (comparatively) in the first half. Lamarcus and Martell hit their shots, which makes all the difference in the world for our overall confidence. We expect Brandon to hit them but we really need forward scoring to make the offense click. We blasted the Rockets in points in the paint. We had them shooting over the top while we drove or posted--a real role reversal. The outside shots we hit opened up the floor, allowing this. We did a decent job rebounding. We also had great tempo, getting into our offensive sets quickly and even fast-breaking a couple of times. We saw visions of the future when Lamarcus made that one dash down the court ahead of all the Rockets players and miles ahead of Yao.
In the second half, alas, they ground us down. Yao Ming stopped monkeying around outside the key and went all Andre the Giant on us in the paint. Nothing good is going to happen for us when he establishes position three feet from the hoop. We are dead unless we foul. And foul we did, to the tune of 13 free throws for him, of which he hit 11. When we doubled or tripled to compensate they simply swung the ball and hit the open shooter. When we covered that shooter they drove past us. Tracy McGrady ended up as the only significant Rocket that didn't have a pristine shooting night, and as we all know T-Mac doesn't need to hit 50% to alter the game. On the other end of the court Lamarcus, our main weapon, went a little cold and Roy missed a few from the field and the line. That's how the Rockets built a lead. They're hard to catch when they do that because of their deliberate style and their plethora of halfcourt weapons. We never hit enough shots or got enough stops to catch up. Ballgame.
The first eye-popping stat of the night was our 13-point deficit at the foul line. We shot 52% on 21 free throws, they shot 86% on 28 free throws. You almost don't have to know any other stats than that one to tell we lost. The second interesting line was three-point shooting. We shot 2-6 (33%). They shot 7-16 (44%). Anyone else remember when we were winning doing that to other teams?
Individual Notes
--Brandon had a rough first game back, shooting 5-13 from the field and 5-10 from the line for 15 points. He did have 8 assists and 5 rebounds, which was classic form. Every team tries to body up Brandon and pound him into a bad night. Between Shane Battier and Bonzi Wells Houston is better at it than most. Another reason this is a bad matchup for us.
--Lamarcus had an amazing offensive first half, a so-so offensive second half, combining for a good game overall. He shot 10-26, which isn't great, but he scored 22 with a variety of moves. He had 3 blocks (great). He also had 3 defensive rebounds (not so great). I understand he's playing farther out on the floor on both ends than the traditional power forward and this is going to hamper his ability to notch huge rebounding numbers, but we just cannot survive getting less than one defensive rebound per quarter from one of our bigs. It doesn't work that way.
--Joel Przybilla had a pretty good night I thought. His offense was OK when he touched it (which thankfully wasn't much). He also got 9 rebounds.
--Martell shot 5-8 for 11 points and had 6 rebounds too. This was the first night in a while that he's been both aggressive and confident and I would have liked to have seen him make a few more drives and/or receive a few more passes off screens for jumpers. He was hot early in the second but kind of wasted it taking long shots off the dribble while covered. In retrospect we probably should have fed him more.
--Travis Outlaw played 27 minutes and got 7 points. He has to double that at least if we're going to win. A little bit of the sizzle has fizzled for him.
--Jarrett Jack only got 19 minutes. Whatever anybody else critiques (and there's plenty to critique) on the plays when I yell, "Nice drive!!!" at my TV the word that most often follows is "Jarrett". He scored 7 on 50% shooting.
--Sergio bounced back a little from his nightmare the other night, shooting 3-4 and netting 2 assists in 11 minutes.
--Channing Frye was good, not great. He did burn some fouls against Yao. This is a tough team for him to play against.
--Steve Blake was Steve Blake. His 5 assists were nice. He ran the offense well enough and make some nice plays with his feet on defense.
One-Sentence Game Summary:
This game was better than expected, not as good as needed.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Better Than Expected?
The Blazers are tired to be sure, but every team plays essentially the same schedule and everyone is tired. My only thought is that because these Blazers are young and most have not played this many minutes, they are just not mentally equipped to handle it.
The most disappointing part of this game was that I felt the Blazers began to give up in the 4th once they got down 9. So much so that I began fast forwarding the TiVo because I could see the look on their faces. What happened to the team that "Owned the 4th?"
Certainly this season has been much better than expected so far and people have consistently referred back to that after their recent slump. The tough part about that is that it's like overachieving and having a hot girlfriend and then she gets fat. You know you can pull the hot chick, and you know she's there somewhere, you just don't know how to get it out. That's almost as frustrating as never pulling a hot chick at all.
We are not as good as the "streak" team, but are we as bad as the 5-12 team? The schedule does not get any easier...
by nedzadrules on Feb 11, 2008 10:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Haha
by BlazerBandit on Feb 11, 2008 11:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ummm...
--Dave
by Dave on Feb 11, 2008 10:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jarrett
by sergioFTW on Feb 11, 2008 11:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think Jarrett has shown
--Dave
by Dave on Feb 11, 2008 11:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What happened to Jack?
by BlazerBandit on Feb 11, 2008 11:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think part of it
But a bigger part of it is that there's a huge difference between being a point guard in a "dribble down slowly, dump it into the post" offense like we had last year with Zach and this "push tempo and pass" offense we have this year. Plus Roy is handling the ball more and Jack is getting limited minutes, both of which make it harder for him to get in the groove.
I am in the mode of appreciating what Jarrett does well and passing over most of his rough spots at the moment, much as I am with Sergio. At one point I was more critical of both of them but I don't think either one really calls for much criticism at the moment. They're not really mattering enough.
--Dave
by Dave on Feb 11, 2008 11:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Whenever a turnover is called...
He had 4 turnovers last night and since Jack has been getting more minutes, the turnovers have increased. Granted, the more minutes the more stats in every category. However, when Jack makes a turnover, it's usually at a very bad time and the opposition almost always scores off that turnover.
It's gotten to the point that both my wife and I groan when Jack's named is called, knowing that there will be some good and some very bad things happening. Not to mention the poor defense. I thought Jarrett might get whiplash last night from him whipping his neck around to watch the opposing player drive past.
It is my opinion that Jack has hit his ceiling, and this is as good as it gets. Considering such, I think his liabilities outweigh his contributions. He does bring some things to the game that help, but overall, he hurts the flow of the game too much. Of course my logic may be one of the reasons I'm not coaching basketball...;-)
Peace
by ColoradoBlazerFan on Feb 12, 2008 6:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
...... and
by TwoDeep on Feb 12, 2008 8:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I said the exact thing you're saying
I don't think Jack's ceiling is as high as Outlaw's, but Jack is still a very young PG. He will continue to improve. He didn't have this many turnovers last season, and I suspect it is a combination of him PUSHING to make things happen and trying to fulfill his role as the only penetrator in the 2nd unit.
Twodeep is right, and Jack has been awful in transition, and I scream at the TV every time he keeps the ball and loses it just like I kept yelling at Outlaw when he dribbled into an obvious trap at halfcourt over and over. But since this is mainly a "this season" thang, and the fact he's a young PG who has a difficult new role off the bench, I'll keep giving him the benefit of the doubt.
I dunno if he's a real PG anymore, but he's at least a great scoring PG off the bench.
He fills a role on this team that no one else can do. I can't see these TO problems being a career long thing.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 12, 2008 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i too thought the game was ok
meanwhile, we certainly play better when brandon's around. im concerned about travis at the moment; he seems to be in a bit of a funk. it seems like he's not getting the ball at the right places and/or he's returning it too readily to the guard when he receives the initial pass if things look crowded or unfavorable.
martell sure doesnt hit many 3s anymore. i dont what's going on there. if hes going to develop his mid-range game and go to the hoop great, but he only seems to do this a couple times a game.
can we go 14-17 the rest of the season and finish 42-40? 45 wins looks high at this point.
by ignacio on Feb 12, 2008 3:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
My goal for this
by TwoDeep on Feb 12, 2008 8:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























