Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

Bounce Back or Flatten Out?

I'm really interested to see how the Blazers will proceed following last night's game.  Let's face it...we have been pretty flat the last couple of outings.  It took a ton of determination and good fortune to beat the Hawks.  Is the flatline due to opponents keying in on us, our own physical fatigue, or many of our players not being used to the mental/emotional grind of the season?

I rather suspect it's the latter, which makes this next game very interesting.  This team, as most young teams do, depends on emotion and conviction to win.  They're at their best when they're rooting for each other, attacking the game with vigor, hugging and jumping on the way off of the floor after a victory.  When the wind goes out of the sails we're not that good.  Anyone remember the stunning loss in Philadelphia precipitating our worst losing jag of the season?  On the other hand a big reason we won out through December was our (perhaps naive) belief that we could win no matter what the circumstances.

Last night's game was a classic example of winning no matter what the circumstances.  Will this bounce us back into energetic, winning play?  Or will the lethargy make a comeback, overwhelming that brilliant, sparkling fourth quarter?

It'll be interesting to see what kind of opposition LeBron finds when he comes to town.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

P.S.  If you liked the little interview on 1080 The Fan last Saturday you're in luck.  It's becoming a regular feature.  The time slot will be 10:10 every Saturday morning on the Sports Saturday show.  It won't be a long segment, but we'll have time to discuss the week's trends and a few other interesting questions.

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Way to go Dave
What did he call you "Brah?" Kind of lame. It should at least be "Sir" or "Master Dave" or something along those lines. Dont let this morning activity throw off all your late night recaps and such. The cavs are red hot and LeBron has no fear of anybody on our D. Hopefully Varajao cant go. I saw him hit the deck in the fakers game. I think this two days off is going to wonders for our team. We need to keep the offense fresh. Too many times recently we pass, pass, pass, then somebody shots a contested shot with time dwindling down. Need to run some set plays and execute them. Would love to see LmA and Martell get some set plays through out the game. Keep up the good work Dave.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 28, 2008 1:10 PM PST reply actions  

Great Game! New Blazer Blog to check out!
Heck of a game...I just can't get over this team!

New blog to check out:

http://blazersog.wordpress.com/

Keep up the good work here guys...Go Blazers!

Blazersog writers

by jpeters2 on Jan 28, 2008 1:14 PM PST reply actions  

I asked myself the same question
Hey Dave, I was wondering the same thing as I left the Rose Garden last night.  I just kept saying to myself, "That is a game that we should not have won, but what does it mean for future games?"  NO and Houston games were similar, 2nd half disasters.  Hawks game was a first half disaster, and maybe even a first 3 1/2 quarter disaster.  Just because Roy was let into the lane does not change the fact that LMA, Webster, Travis, and Blake are not hitting their shots.  Now, LMA showed some positive signs in the second half and so did Travis and Frye can hit from 10 feet, but we need the outside shooting back.  Or do we?  Maybe this will show this team that you will have better success over the long haul if you take your shots closer to the basket.  I am not sure what this game will mean for future games, in terms of getting hot again, but Dave, you are right about the Will and Energy part.  This team needs it.  Once the team started its run, the Rose Garden energy rose and then the Blazer energy just kept coming, both offensively and more importantly defensively.  As Nate said, Roy's defense was why we won, together with the Energy.  That was the best man defense I have ever seen Roy play, other than maybe his block on Carmello against Denver.  Woodson made a bad call to not double Roy, apparently afraid that Travis would hit more threes.  It was a great game to be at, after having heartburn for the first 3 1/2 quarters.

By the way, my seats are right with the Blazer family seats, and Brandon's fiance', and family and friends, were there, as usual cheering louder than anyone else.  They also give Brandon a little hand/finger mojo when he shoots foul shots.  I saw when he missed that first shot that it looked too hard when it left his hands, and his family saw it too.  When it left his hands, we all said, "It looks long."

One other thing to mention is the flagrant by Jones.  I am not sure if JJ was just trying to fire up the team by that hard foul.  I think he was getting fed up with the Hawks flying down the court, uncontested.  Maybe he was just giving them something to think about.

Scotte

by BlazerScott on Jan 28, 2008 1:35 PM PST reply actions  

Me Too
It looks like everyone just needs a day off where they do nothing but sit on the couch.  I hope they get an opportunity to recharge.  At least the All Star break is just around the corner.
Our blog administrator could beat up your blog administrator.

by tominhawaii on Jan 28, 2008 1:44 PM PST reply actions  

Yes
This is one reason I'm ambivalent about Roy making the All-Star team. He's sure to have to go one way or the other with the Frosh/Soph game but he'd get more rest if he's left off the big boy's team. On the other hand being an all-star means getting all-star treatement in future games which in the long term is good.

The team looks tired and I'm sure they're looking forward to the all-star break.

by jon @ Blazer's Edge on Jan 28, 2008 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

you hit the nail on the head here
after the game, jay allen from kxl asked jarrett if he was looking forward to the day off.  he just laughed and laughed and laughed....

by DraftKevinDurant on Jan 28, 2008 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the blazer's youth really showed through
In those losses to NO and Houston, you could tell they were probably emotionally and physically spent.  Only getting a day off after that 12 day slog before having to take on a physical, resurgent rockets team was no surprise to see it fall into the L column.

I think the two mikes had a good point in the broadcast; basically teams have figured out that all you have to do is press Brandon on the perimeter with double teams, and break up the pick & roll and you have a good chance of disrupting the team's offense, I credit Nate for coming up with an adjustment of Brandon passing into the high post where guys like Channing and LA were able to press an advantage.

Cleveland is going to be a tall order, but I'm confident they'll give them good fight.

by nikolokolus on Jan 28, 2008 1:50 PM PST reply actions  

Team growth
I think the Blazers have been learning through the season.  They figured out a way to play solid zone defense and they figured out a way to score which got them their big win streak. However, teams learned both how to exploit said Zone and to stop the Blazers offense.  The Blazers O looked eerily similar to what we say at the start of the season the last couple of games.  But they adjusted, as indicated by McMillan in the post Atlana game Q&A.  Bradon started getting the ball to the bigs when doubled as they slip the lane. That shows learning.  Games evolve over a season with teams constantly countering offensive and defensive schemes.  Good teams learn to counter back and continue to win, while the bad teams begin to pile on losses as they continue to follow losing game plans.  WE were one of the lossing teams last year.  If the Blazers show that can adapt and continually make adjustments then we willl have really turned the corner.  I expect to keep playing at least .500 ball the rest of the season, which may or may not be good enough to make the playoffs.  The learning curve from here on out however will be entirely new to most of the team and will be what pays dividends next season and on down the road.

by NWfan on Jan 28, 2008 1:55 PM PST reply actions  

Well, they sorta figured out how to beat
the trap teams have been hitting Roy with.  McMillan talked about it after the game, but they were successful in having Channing Frye and LaMarcus Aldridge slip the pick at the top of the key and accept lob passes from Brandon and then turn to convert the shot.  Another thing they did to beat it that they didn't talk about was to have Frye or Aldridge turn and screen the small man of the double team and have Roy rush by and end up with a mismatch against a big guy.

So if they can consistently beat the trap like that, their offense should be in a lot better shape because practically everything depends on Brandon Roy offensively, and we know that the Blazers, young as they are play better defense when they are scoring.  That trap was huge for both the Hornets and the Rockets.

So I'll go ahead and drink the Kool-aid and say the Blazers will win a few in a row because they will have solved the trap at the top of the key.

by ranma on Jan 28, 2008 2:16 PM PST reply actions  

Attention on Roy and Being Tired.
Roy has been getting just hounded lately.  They really need to figure out some ways to combat that.  Also they are really really tired.  They have been playing at least every other day for a good 3 weeks now.  And they are just now getting to spend a couple days at home. I think not flying every other night is going to help them rest a lot.

by mxpx5678 on Jan 28, 2008 2:20 PM PST reply actions  

What should the team practice?
  1.  Work on practicing how to handle trapped pick and rolls.  Slip screens up the middle, double screens, and hand offs.  Jack and Sergio definitely need to work on it.  The bigs, Aldridge and Frye, will have more responsibility in decision making with the ball too.

  2.  Zone defense.  Our zone defense is being exploited on the baseline and over the top to the weak side, like the two alley oops in the Hawks game.

  3. Transition defense.  No excuse to allow scores in transition after made buckets.

  4. Alridge post ups.  I sense that we will need him to improve his post ups for us to get open looks when the pick n' rolls aren't working.

  5. Playing against aggressive/physical defense.  We need to knuckle up when people challenge us on offense.  Make crisp passes and use their aggressiveness against them with cuts to the basket.

With Roy playing at an all-star level and a break coming up.  The 2nd half should be just as good as the first.

by blzrfan on Jan 28, 2008 2:34 PM PST reply actions  

After this nice rest
I think they'll be fine.  The biggest difference might be that we won't surprise anyone anymore as everyone knows that the Blazers can beat them and who on our team will beat them... we can't sneak up on teams now.

They clearly need rest and then practice time to add a few wrinkles to their attack, how to better thwart the trapping other teams do on the pick n' roll and other stuff smarter peoples have mentioned.  I'm glad the Atlanta game was in the afternoon, so they got the evening and the next day to sleep and dream of me dreaming of them, and then get to practice on Tuesday and be ready to let Lebron do whatever he wants while no one else does anything.

The Cavs are a bad team.  Like, bad bad.  Lebron is so amazing he can cover up a lot of their awfulness and will his team to solid victories.  You can't stop him.  The best you can do is hope he feels like taking a lot of jumpers that day, and that he hasn't been practicing a consistent release lately (when he fades back on normal jumpers he'll miss most of them).  Take away his playmaking ability and you shut down the rest of the team-- no one can make their own shot (no one who can score, that is).

This was a big, big win.  We didn't deserve it, but it ends a small losing streak and makes the day off and practice a whole lot nicer.  Now the Cavs game doesn't have as much pressure and we'll be more likely to win the dang thing.  It was great timing for a win, like we have seemed to do all year with our losses.

That 4th quarter exorcised the recent lame play, I hope.

They just need some nap time with their binkeys and maybe a relaxing hot air balloon trip.

Mortimer  

by Mortimer on Jan 28, 2008 2:48 PM PST reply actions  

Last night's victory was ....
eerily similar to their last second win over Memphis awhile back. They rattled off 13 straight after that. I think last night's win will give them a similar mojo boost. I don't think we can expect 13 straight, but I think we can expect the hard-playing, cold-blooded team we've grown accustomed to to show up against the Cavs ...

by bfan on Jan 28, 2008 2:49 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah
And like Nate said, winning this game is kinda like getting that Philly game back.  Now, record wise, we're where we should be and all is right in the universe.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jan 28, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

There is no way to tell
if or when a young team or player has hit a wall until after it has happened.  The next couple of weeks may or may not tell.  

We have 4 home games followed by 4 road games.  A split of the home games would be reasonable, considering the opponents (Cav's, Knicks, Nuggets & Bulls).  Winning one on the road is all we should expect (Pistons, Pacers, Rockets & Mav's).  We could go 3-5 the next two weeks and it would not be indicative of anything but a tough schedule.  

Perhaps the second half of Feb will be a better indicator.  We play Seattle and the Lakers twice, along with the Kings and Clips.  If we win fail to win at least three of those, then I'd say we have evidence of wallitis.  Of course it also depends on how we lose.  It is possible to play well and still lose.  

by timg56 on Jan 28, 2008 2:58 PM PST reply actions  

Dave's New Gig; Blazer's bounce-back
Congratulations Dave on landing a regular spot on (by far) the best local program that 1080 has to offer!  I don't know why everyone is so fired up about the "brah" comment.  Perhaps they aren't familiar with Gavin Dawson.  First off, Gavin is a big Blazers fan and does a very good job of covering them both on Sports Saturday and on the post-game.  Secondly, he seems to be a pretty genuine individual.  He's just a laid-back, friendly guy who wants to connect with people -- hence "brah".  Now that Newbear is gone, he's the only thing that keeps that station from the pit of despair.  So, it's very exciting that the program will be EDGier than usual.  Well done.
     I think folks have already said plenty of valid things about tiredness, etc.  The most telling thing is that the coaching staff is talking openly about it instead of saying "suck it up."  That shows a real respect of the players by the coaches for their effort and their devotion to the team and craft.  I think Cleveland can be a good matchup (knock on wood) with Pavlovich down and Varejao dinged, because we should have too many weapons for them to deal with, unless Lebron goes 45/15/15 on us.
     Thanks for the discussion all!

by BlazersAx on Jan 28, 2008 3:12 PM PST reply actions  

I'm pretty concerned
about the overall poor play of Martell, Jack, and Aldridge.  I had been hoping that the young guys would get back on track at home, but they've yet to really show much of a spark in the last two home games.  Martell hasn't had a good game since the Utah third quarter explosion, Jack hasn't really had much game since the Chicago overtime game, and Aldridge -- I can't even remember the last good game of his.  If these three keep playing the way they've been playing over the past few weeks, I think our chance of making the playoffs is pretty damn slim.

by howlingfantods on Jan 28, 2008 3:16 PM PST reply actions  

16 and 8 on 7-11
against the Hawks last night is decent for LaMarcus.  He was out for stretches because Frye was playing well.

by ranma on Jan 28, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Not to beat a dead horse
But they're young. We had a taste of the big time and now we want it all. These are the same guys they were in October.

Martel's only been in the league 2.5 years. He'd only be a junior in college.

LMA still needs to build the core strength and upper body mass that it tool Jermaine O'Neal 6 or 7 years in the league to build.

Jack isn't a finesse player going to the rim, but he blows stuff up every once in a while. He gets the defense out of their comfort zone even when he does look like he should be going at a tacking dummy instead of the hoop. And he's young too, especially for a point.

I'll be concerned if they still look like this, at this point in the season in 2010.

by bubba on Jan 28, 2008 3:34 PM PST reply actions  

Playing on the Lead
We have been playing from behind for so long. Life on the road is hard, but now we've brought a comeback mentality home. It is great that we don't know quit when we're behind.  But when can we learn how to salt a game away?

I want to see another game like we had against the Nets. And I want to see us press the save button. We need some easy, front-running wins.  There is no way these guys, young as they are, can lay everything on the line every game for 82+. Nor is there any reason they have to if they can build leads and make other teams struggle and burn all their energy.

'77

by LaoTzu on Jan 28, 2008 4:25 PM PST reply actions  

Nate needs to set a curfew
No more late movies for this team.  Nate needs to make sure these young guys are in bed by 10:00 PM.  Their young bodies need time to rest and grow.
Our blog administrator could beat up your blog administrator.

by tominhawaii on Jan 28, 2008 4:48 PM PST reply actions  

No more soda after dinner time
Sergio gets way too rowdy when he has a soda after eight.  He runs all around the house, jumping on the couch, asking Nate if he can stay up a half hour longer to watch the end of Celebrity Apprentice.

It drives Nate CRAZY, and makes Sergio grouchy and tired the entire next day.  And if LMA is staying over, forget about it.  You'll think they're in bed but before you know it they're sliding down the stairs on flattened cardboard, making a racket.  Before the win streak started, Nate made the rule that sleepovers on a pre-game night aren't allowed, and since then they've played better than ever.

But he's gotta remain strict, because if you give kids an inch they'll tear out your heart.

Also, no more phone after 9pm.  Martell and Travis keep calling Rebecca Harlow and hanging up over and over.  Martell says Travis likes her and just wants to ask Becca if she likes Travis, but Travis is too shy and hangs up the phone each time. "Aww, shucks, hahaha, Naw I don't c'mon, ahhhh..."

They're good kids, but need stern guidance.  Nate is doing a good job.

Mortimer  

by Mortimer on Jan 28, 2008 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't forget
marshmellows in the carpet and that time Martell got gum in Trout's hair and Nate had to shave Travis's head (that still hasn't grown back).

by 92wastheyear on Jan 28, 2008 6:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Since Travis has no hair on the top of his head...
...I want no part in knowing how this happened!
I'm not stubborn, just obstinate

by T Darkstar on Jan 29, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I really should read the rest of your post...
...before I comment.
I'm not stubborn, just obstinate

by T Darkstar on Jan 29, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Dont feed them after midnight
OR ELSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBKeapt0rKY

I think that is what the Blazer plane looks like after the boys get into the booz.

"I Dare You Not to Like the Blazers" Henry Abbott

by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 28, 2008 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Great topic
I've been wondering about this also.

LaMarcus started to look a lot better in that 2nd half.  If he can get going it would be a MAJOR boost.

Hopefully a couple days without a game will allow the team to come out with some energy and play like we did during the winning streak (or at least closer to that level than to the 5-12 level).

by jksnake99 on Jan 28, 2008 5:33 PM PST reply actions  

Same as most everyone else
I think they are tired from the trip.  7 games in 11 days is a bit ridiculous.  Right before they left they played 2 games in 10 days.  I know it happens to every team and there are all kinds of reasons for it happening; but the schedulers need to step back and look at the schedule at times.

The combo of physical and mental fatigue and no practice have allowed teams to take advantage of the Blazers.  They will get rest and practice and with that bounce back.  They may not win 13 straight again this season but they will get back to playing good ball and competing.  Heck they have at least been competing while they have been struggling.

by tssbro on Jan 28, 2008 7:26 PM PST reply actions  

Look Out Dave!!
When you went off the air on Saturday, they were asking what your background was. They said, "he must have coaching experience", "did we get a bio." I think we'll be learning a lot about Dave on this Saturday program. Congratulations Dave!!

I agree with all. They were fatigued, to say the least, the last couple of games. They never fully recovered. I'll bet we see a lot more energy out of 'em on Wednesday. It'll still be a tough one to win. The Cavs won't fold on them the way the Hawks did. King James will be a little more difficult for Roy to defend than Joe.

by coreydm on Jan 28, 2008 9:07 PM PST reply actions  

In a sense,
that 13 game winning streak may have been as much curse as blessing in that it raised expectations for this team well beyond what is realistic.

Prior to The Streak, the Blazers were classed with the T'Wolves, Sonics and the league's other bottom feeders. A mere 13 games later - voila - they're suddenly hailed as playoff contenders. And so, instead of patiently accepting the growing pains that are characteristic of a young, developing team, fans begin angrily calling for the heads of Jack, Sergio, Frye, Martell or whoever else may have failed to deliver on a given night.

In my estimation, the Blazers are not yet playoff calibre. Nor are they bottom feeders, either. Right now, they look very much like a .500 team who's coming back down to earth after a remarkable run. If you go back and review the preseason predictions made by the people on this site, that's actually better than just about all of you expected. Yet, in the wake of a 13-game winning streak, .500 doesn't look so hotsy-totsy anymore.  

Jeez, people, lighten up will'ya. Some of you are getting so overwrought about some chimerical playoff hopes that you are forgetting to enjoy what may one day be regarded as one of your team's most amazing seasons, ever. The shock and joy of the unexpected is what ultimately provides us sports fans with our most memorable rooting experiences. A great example is the playoff run that my Giants are on. A mediocre team during the NFL regular season, they've defeated three quality opponents in the postseason. Now they're poised to play in the Super Bowl. Do I expect them to beat the 18-0 Pats? No, I don't. Will I be disappointed if they lose. A little, I suppose. But that disappointment will be more than outweighed by the joy they've given me with their unexpected success. And if by some grace of the football gods they manage to win the Big Game, it will undoubtedly rank as one of the most exhilirating sports moments of my entire life as a fan. What the Blazers have accomplished thus far this season is not all that dis-similar from what the Giants have done in terms of exceeding the little had been expected of them.

Contrast that outlook with that of, say, the Yankee fan who views his season as a failure unless his team wins the World Series. For those fans, expectations are so ridiculously high that victory produces emotions closer to relief than exultation. Next year, when Oden returns, Blazerfan will also begin to have to deal with that heightened weight of expectation. At the very minimum, pundit and fan alike will regard anything less than a playoff appearance as a setback. The exhiliration of unexpected progress that you're currently witnessing will be replaced by a more methodical accounting of success and failure as your team begins its steady, arduous climb toward Elite status.

In short, what the Blazers are giving you now is something that's so special and rare, it transcends just the simple reckoning of wins and losses. The players and coaches all recognize this; Jason Quick sees it; even Pritchard gets it. It's sad, then, that there are so many here who seem to have lost sight of it.

by knickfan on Jan 28, 2008 9:08 PM PST reply actions  

excellent post
This Blazers team is a joy to watch and if they finish the season at 40-44 wins and miss the playoffs it would still be a successful season. The fact that the Blazers are still in the thick of the playoff race over halfway through the season (and in the west!) is awesome.

One small bone to pick: Even at 5-12 NOBODY was saying we were as bad as the Timberpuppies.  We were more on the level of the Grizzlies and Clippers.

by jksnake99 on Jan 28, 2008 9:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks knickfan
Well said.
Do you think the Giants are going to get all the questionable calls, or will they go to the Patriots?    I don't trust the officials and think the Giants Patriots are going to extra men on the field wearing stripes.
Our blog administrator could beat up your blog administrator.

by tominhawaii on Jan 28, 2008 9:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Awe dang it
I changed my thought in mid-sentence and messed up.  I need to his "Preview" more.  

I don't trust the officials and think the Patriots are going to extra men on the field wearing stripes.

Our blog administrator could beat up your blog administrator.

by tominhawaii on Jan 28, 2008 9:42 PM PST up reply actions  

While I didn't really intend to
shunt this discussion away from the Blazers and over to football, I'll just say that from a fan interest/marketing perspective I believe it's very much in the NFL's interest to have the Pats finish the year at 19-0.

From a historical standpoint as well as a storybook one, the prospect of an undefeated season is just too enticing to pass up. I think a lot of people have an emotional investment in seeing it come to fruition. So, while I don't think the game will be "fixed" in the traditional sense, it's probably the case that the officials have bought into the dominant narrative line and will - consciously or not - help it along. Someone had to be the sacrificial lamb in this little pageant. That appears to be the Giants' role this year.

by knickfan on Jan 28, 2008 10:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry, I feel the same way
I watched the Colts-Bolts game and the Colts got all the calls.  So there is some hope, since the Chargers actually won.  I'll send you a hug if they lose.  

I used "Preview" in my last comment and still had a typo.  How cool is that?

Our blog administrator could beat up your blog administrator.

by tominhawaii on Jan 28, 2008 10:19 PM PST up reply actions  

If you were a Blazer fan
I'd send you a Blazersedge t-shirt just for using the word "chimerical".

You made my toes curl.

--Dave

by Dave on Jan 28, 2008 10:55 PM PST up reply actions  

He is
He's in denial and just can't bring himself to admit it yet.

by jscot on Jan 29, 2008 1:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Listen to what Knickfan says.
Though it is a fan's right to be critical (or wildly enthusiastic), a lot of the criticisms that show up here have gotten old.

Have we forgotten that our team is the youngest in the league?  The third youngest in league history?  We have exactly 4 guys on this team who play regularly that played four years of college ball.  Both physically and experience wise most of our team still has a lot of growing and developing to do.  Meanwhile they are providing us with winning basketball.  

I have to wonder if some here beat their kids or put them up for foster care when they spill a glass of milk at the dinner table or bring home a C- on a test.

by timg56 on Jan 29, 2008 6:54 AM PST up reply actions  

No
Only when they miss their free throws, or fail to box out.

by jscot on Jan 29, 2008 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

What criticisms exactly are you talking about?
I see most people fairly critiquing the play of the team and fairly celebrating the success the team is having.

If you mean people that want to jump off a bridge because we lost two in a row or who think the world will end if we fall out of the 8th seed this year I kind of understand, but that's not really what I'd call "criticism".

But if you mean nobody should ever say anything critical about the team or they're not a fan I can't get on board with that.

Blanket critiques like "stuff we see on here" are seldom helpful.  They're often semi-accurate responses to one or two comments.  Some clarification of what you mean would help.

--Dave

by Dave on Jan 29, 2008 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Timing
I would say it is more the timing of some of the criticism.  Joel doesn't play in the fourth quarter during a stretch of great games and there is no criticism.  The Blazer's lose one game and immediately the calls for Joel to be in the game down the stretch or Jack to be traded begin surfacing.

It would be nice if some waited for a trend to actually develop before unleashing the criticism.  I mean if a strategy works more often than not, it is difficult to fault Nate for going with the percentages.  

That said, if certain opinions are annoying, it is best not to keep reading them over and over.  

by tssbro on Jan 29, 2008 8:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Yah
I also find it somewhat annoying that people get up in arms about certain things during a loss but not the same thing during a win.

Another way of putting is if something works 8 out of 9 times it's probably a good idea...even on that 9th time.

--Dave

by Dave on Jan 29, 2008 9:24 PM PST up reply actions  

One good thing
At least no one has called for Nate's head lately.

by MiledAnimal on Jan 29, 2008 10:00 AM PST reply actions  

I call for Nate's head ...
... minted on a coin. He has been money.

That said, I hope he steps back in more to reset the team. The kids have been playing well together, but they still got a ways to go. They need new stuff to beat a better prepared league. Nobody thinks we're the T'wolves anymore.

'77

by LaoTzu on Jan 29, 2008 12:10 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension
Cap004_small
A Running Team should Know How to Finish the Fast Break

Recent FanPosts

Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?
Small
WE NEED JOSE CALDERON ASAP.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm