Blazers-Magic Comparison
As we prepare to face the Magic today here are some thoughts from Ben at sister-site ThirdQuarterCollapse.com about the similarities--or lack thereof--between the Blazers and Magic.
Even with Oden's absence, there are similarities between these two teams. They currently lead their respective divisions, they're both fairly young (although the Blazers are decidedly moreso), and both their futures are tied to franchise-caliber centers. But there's a key difference between these two teams, which is why I think one is on the rise and the other is not:
The draft.
I'm not an expert on the Trail Blazers, but I know that Brandon Roy and Martell Webster have been instrumental to the team's recent success. Both those players were drafted by Portland. Jarrett Jack wasn't originally a Portland draft choice, but he was obtained in a draft-night trade, so he might as well have been. Throw in a few savvy veterans obtained via free-agency (Steve Blake, Joel Pryzbilla) and you have a young, athletic, promising team that should expect to be in title contention for -- no kidding -- the next decade.
Contrast that draft-night and free-agency success with that of the Magic. Drafting Dwight Howard was a no-brainer for a team with an unhappy superstar in his prime (Tracy McGrady) coming off a 21-win season. He's younger than Emeka Okafor and we know now he's a much better player, which is no slight to Okafor. The team also obtained another key piece, Jameer Nelson, via a draft-night trade. But look at the other players the Magic have drafted recently:
* 2004:
o Anderson Varejao (later traded to Cleveland for Tony Battie)
* 2005:
o Fran Vazquez (famously and unexpectedly declined to join the NBA; won't play in the US until 2010 at the earliest.)
o Travis Diener (played sparingly in two seasons; left via free-agency in the summer of 2006)
* 2006:
o J.J. Redick (still can't crack the rotation)
o James Augustine (good hustle player who picks up minutes here and there, but probably belongs in the D-League; drafted ahead of Paul Millsap)
As far as free-agency goes, the Magic have had mixed luck. Keyon Dooling and Keith Bogans were brought in, but they're more role-players than anything else. And before this summer's signing of Rashard Lewis, the Magic's best wing scorer was Hedo Turkoglu, also a free-agent pickup. Lewis, supposedly the best player available last summer, has not impressed so far.
I suppose the point I'm trying to make is the following: Portland has shown patience with Roy, Webster, and Travis Outlaw. They've also looked to add veterans like Blake, Pryzbilla, and James Jones when possible. They're more realistic about their stars' timeline, but at the same time realize that veterans can help with the learning curve. And when Oden comes back next year, Portland is going to be damn tough to beat. The Magic, meanwhile, are built to win now. They have Howard, yes, and he's arguably the best center in the game (unless you count Tim Duncan as a center, anyway). They have Rashard Lewis, who hasn't lived up to his reputation as a big-time scorer. They traded for Darko Milicic and Carlos Arroyo in 2005, hoping they would put the team on the fast-track to success. They traded Trevor Ariza (a promising, athletic, energetic defender) to the Lakers in November for veterans Brian Cook and Maurice Evans, hoping that small adjustment would do the trick. It hasn't. And it probably won't ever. Until this team decides on an identity -- win now or win later? -- it can't expect to get beyond the second round of the playoffs.
Interesting thoughts, I'm sure you'll agree. Thanks for the perspective Ben!
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
The Blazers have been much smarter
by jayseyfield on Jan 19, 2008 12:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
LMA
by jscot on Jan 19, 2008 1:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's exceptionally easy
- Brandon Roy
- Young guys we've waited on for them to get better
I'm impressed he knows Outlaw and Webster. I'm also impressed this wasn't just a long way of saying "Orlando is going to RULE the East in two years!" You telling me 95% of bloggers out there wouldn't speak more highly of their own team than the opponent in such a situation, especially if Dwight Howard was on their side?
--Dave
by Dave on Jan 19, 2008 1:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
It just seemed odd that he would be so knowledgeable about our role players and not mention our success in drafting LMA.
He seems kind of depressed about his team. They're leading their division, and Howard is only going to get better. I wonder if he'd have been saying the same four weeks ago? They've not done well recently.
This Trailblazer team is winning fans everywhere, though, even among the enemy. For a while, we're going to be everyone's second favorite team, I think.
His site looks well-written, with intelligent analysis. Too bad he doesn't get more participation. Seems like a lot of the sister sites (outside of GSOM) are that way.
by jscot on Jan 19, 2008 2:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Depressed
The reason I'm not really too pleased with the season so far is the way some of the losses have gone. 24-17 is by no means a bad record; hell, if you (or anyone) had told me in October that the Magic would be on a 48-win pace at the season's halfway point, I would have been thrilled. But watching this team drop 13 of 21 games after a strong 16-4 start was disheartening. I guess the point is that the record itself is nice, but it doesn't exist in a vacuum.
In no way am I giving up on the team, but it's frustrating to see this team, after adding a new coach and a new sharpshooter, fall into the same bad habits that last year's team did.
by Ben Q Rock on Jan 19, 2008 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LaMarcus
I do indeed know about LaMarcus. In fact, after I shot this post to Dave via email, I realized I should have mentioned the Blazers' acquiring him for the rights to Tyrus Thomas, another shrewd move that's looking more and more like a steal with every passing day. I'm not happy about that omission, but I stand by the rest of what I wrote.
by Ben Q Rock on Jan 19, 2008 1:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the note
Well, after the fact.... Perhaps Nate wishes he'd forgotten Aldridge for that game, too. 6 for 21. Wonder if we could trade him back to Chicago (jk).
by jscot on Jan 20, 2008 12:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No Smooth ?
pickup and will be great. When LaMarcus gains
8-10 more lbs of muscle (especially in his core)
he will be hammer dunking the same forays to
the bucket now blocked or finessed. It's his
top of the reach jumper that makes him "SMOOTH".
He just needs to work on jumper body control
and not fade so much. Rasheed went through the
same evolution in his shot. Oh, and add GO to
the mix and Smooth gets three to four dunks a
night, knifing down the lane. It's going to be
UNBELIEVABLE !
BRING BACK OUR BLAZERS TO SOUTHERN OREGON !
by walkoff41 on Jan 19, 2008 1:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
no
by shralpster on Jan 19, 2008 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by tominhawaii on Jan 19, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























