Game 38 Recap: Blazers 90, Celtics 100
OK folks, this was not our best game but this was a good game. We gave the Celtics all they could handle for a couple of quarters, hung close until Ray Allen delivered the coup de grace at the end, and left the court with our heads held high. I'm not sure I can understand anybody being disappointed with this game. We could have easily gotten blown out of the water. But we never let them take us for granted.
Team Observations
You could tell at the start of the game and at its end the experience gap between the Blazers and the Celtics. We came out nervous and played tighter than normal down the stretch. But in the middle of the game we had some fine, fine possessions. Our ball movement was basically solid. Our shooting was good. Our three-point shooting was good. We battled back and forth for the lead. We watched guys step up. When we were in the flow there was little difference between the ultra-young Blazers and the championship-contending Celtics. The big differences ended up being that the Celtics stayed in the flow longer than we did and they timed it better. We took the lead at the half and extended it early in the third but they put down the hammer and crushed us late in the third and through the fourth.
The most glaring problem for Portland was an uncharacteristic number of turnovers. Boston harassed us into mistakes and then capitalized on our 19 turnovers to the tune of 23 points. We only had 8 points off of their turnovers. That's a +15 advantage and...scene! That's a wrap. Equally disturbing were our defensive and rebounding slips. We didn't get outrebounded overall by much but we let a lot of offensive boards slip by including a couple off of free throws. Missing free throw rebounds should never happen. Our big man corps looked smaller and weaker than their Boston counterparts tonight. They also had real trouble rotating. Celtics drove the baseline several times and found no opposition inside. They also whipped passes through the interior. We had a serious lack of recognition, foot movement, and just plain hands-up energy in the interior tonight. We did alright one-on-one but as soon as Boston moved ball or feet towards the middle we were sunk. They also attempted 14 more free throws than we did. Much of that was attributable to our defense. If there was some homecourt star-power in there, well, what do you expect?
A. They were at home.
B. They are stars.
C. It didn't matter anyway because everything else in that paragraph spelled our doom before any free throws were shot.
Again...when you realize the overall mediocrity of our interior defense, rebounding, transition, and ball-handing you understand what a nice effort we gave in other parts of the game to hang close.
Beyond all of this, the Celtics had Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen, and Paul Pierce. Garnett has scored 19,737 points in this league. Allen has scored 17,534 and Pierce 16,127. Our roster combined has scored exactly 25,202, and 10,047 of those belong to Raef LaFrentz and Darius Miles. In other words any one of their stars has put more points on the board than our entire rotation. Those guys know how to play and know how to win. If you're talking just in right now terms Boston fielded the best, most accomplished three players on the court tonight. In any other world that's a recipe for a blowout. Apparently in Blazerland it just means the game is going to be pretty close.
Nobody better be hanging their heads about this.
Individual Observations
--I thought Brandon Roy played a fine game. He didn't take over but he kept active. He shot 7-16, 7-8 at the line, dished 6 assists, and had 22 points. The Celtics really tried to shut him down once he put the ball on the floor and headed into the lane. That was obviously their game plan. It might have blunted a little bit of his effectiveness--he did have 4 turnovers to go along with his 6 assists--but not much. I would imagine the Celtics came away impressed with him tonight.
--Lamarcus Aldridge started out hot but seemed to fade as the game progressed and Boston keyed on him. He ended up an impressive 7-12 and had 16 points with 2 blocks but he only grabbed 5 defensive rebounds and committed 4 turnovers. He did a credible job of watching Garnett for much of the game before KG just took over down the stretch. I didn't think Lamarcus brought quite enough to get us to the next level though. He looked like a second-year player given a daunting assignment. That's exactly what he was, of course, but we're used to seeing a little more.
--Jarrett Jack looked like he wanted to win this game! He shot very well, got 5 assists, drew some fouls, and ended up with 17 aggressive points. He had the standout game for Portland in the sense of taking his play up a notch. He looked completely non-intimidated by the situation. I wonder if this bodes well for his possible playoff performances?
--Travis Outlaw also got 17 points on only 8 shots. His 7 rebounds weren't bad either. But he contributed to our defensive shortcomings and committed a robust 5 turnovers all on his lonesome.
(Side Note: You could tell who the Celtics chose to key on tonight. Brandon four turnovers, Lamarcus 4, and Travis 5. Warned you about that defense.)
--Joel Przybilla had 9 rebounds and toughened us up a little when he was in. The big problem: this was his worst offensive outing in forever...so bad, in fact, that you just could not see him playing major minutes. He rim-checked himself on dunks and got his shot blocked. He missed chippies and free throws. He fumbled the ball when passed to. It was like Old Joel made an appearance at our end of the court tonight.
--Other than a brief couple of shots off of curl screens in the third quarter Martell had a quiet night. Perhaps he was spending so much energy on defense that he didn't have enough to get open. He didn't do all that well defensively and he didn't get any help when he got burned, so overall you'd have to chalk this up as a tough night for young Master Webster.
--Steve Blake and James Jones were the only Blazers who played more than 20 minutes without a turnover. Each was decent. Neither made a crucial difference.
--Channing Frye had a poor night. He wasn't any better defending the middle than his cohorts. He collected 4 fouls in 12 minutes of play. Worst of all he shot like he was swinging at a piƱata.
--Sergio and Raef really don't bear mentioning.
One Sentence Game Summary
We put up a good fight for being so discombobulated.
Blazer fans can take solace in the fact that had we won this emotionally-charged game chances are good we would have let down in Miami and ended up 1-1. We can still get that same record. It'll just be reversed.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. Thanks everybody for the 1107 comments in the Gameday thread. That stands as a Blazersedge record for a game ending in regulation!
0 recs |
38 comments
Comments
I have to say
by mark twain on Jan 16, 2008 9:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
Another thing that is frustatinging to watch is how the Blazers seemingly abandon a player or offensive set that is working. Last night in the third quarter, Nate called a few plays for Martell. He hit 2 of 3 shots, looked to be getting hot but then the team went back to the high pick and roll, which wasn't really working. Martell didn't see the ball for the rest of the half.
Second, in the 4th quarter, right when we were making our final push, we ran some iso for Roy. No pick and roll, just mano y mano and it was working. No one Boston sent forth to guard Roy could stick with him and it created a couple good looks for Roy and an assist or two. Yet, the team went right back into the pick and roll to close the game. Boston hounded the dribbler out of the P&R all game long and it never felt like it was creating good looks, save for one beautiful Blake to Pryz dunk.
I know this team is unselfish and there are a lot of weapons in the Blazer arsenal but sometimes I feel like the team needs to do a better job of riding the hot hand.
Let's come back strong and put up another 26 point annihilation in Miami. Go Blazers!!!
by PtownJake on Jan 17, 2008 5:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No problem
Miami has lost 11 in a row. Its important that we make it 12 to keep us in position for 3 or 4 wins on this trip. If we win that one, we'll still be in good shape.
by jksnake99 on Jan 16, 2008 9:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
the blazers were within 4 very late
still, if joel makes his dunks and FTs and the refs call one less spurious foul we might have pulled it out.
it was closer than the final score.
by ignacio on Jan 16, 2008 9:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Garnett got one over on us
The one problem I have is that during those crucial late Q4 possessions, why were we going to LaMarcus in the post against KG? That's their dream come true and KG will get the call and win that match-up every time! Is it because Nate wants to continue to "Teach" LaMarcus?
The Blazers have been doing the bullying lately, which I love. I just hate to be the ones getting bullied. Especially by That rat %$#@^$^ KG.
by nedzadrules on Jan 16, 2008 9:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
KG has joined Stephen A
by GustyJ on Jan 16, 2008 9:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Some things from the broadcast
Secondly, the Mikes had me in stitches tonight. From Mike Barret's repeated telling of when the scoreboard said to make noise, to Mike Rice's "Of course Garnetts arguing that. He doesn't know any of the rules." For some reason, they said a lot of things that were extremely blunt that made me laugh a whole lot during the game. Also, because of this game, my friend and I are sure Mike Rice is going to attack someone by the end of the season. He seems to be getting violent in his commentary.
For the game, I think we did pretty well. I want to watch this game again, except with a Rose Garden full of Blazer maniacs screaming for the Blazers. It's not a stretch for us finishing ahead with 22000 Blazermaniacs cheering on the team with how we played.
by joof on Jan 16, 2008 10:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I was actually there last night
by game sink on Jan 17, 2008 9:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I need to watch this game rather than listen, but
I didnt hang my head after the Toronto loss as the Blazers did what they could and played well, but from what I heard they played awful in the 4th. I am downloading the game right now so maybe I will have a different opinion after I watch it, but I am pretty bummed out right now.
by jonestr on Jan 16, 2008 11:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Checkout Danny Ainge
He's actually happy the Celtics didn't get Oden.
He'll regret that, the bastard....
by jayseyfield on Jan 17, 2008 12:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That was pretty funny
by jonestr on Jan 17, 2008 12:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent recap, Dave
That having been said, you're not often going to beat the best team in the league in their building while making 21 turnovers.
by hurryup09 on Jan 17, 2008 2:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This game made me learn
by theanomaly777 on Jan 17, 2008 6:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Dave, great recap
by theanomaly777 on Jan 17, 2008 6:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
They muscled us last night
by iDea on Jan 17, 2008 7:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It is games like this and Toronto
Besides, Toronto would have been a win if the refs had correctly call Calderon's shot as a 2.
Oh - I big thanks to tominhawaii for turning me on to channelsurfing.net. I was able to watch the first half of the game.
by timg56 on Jan 17, 2008 7:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
You're welcome
by tominhawaii on Jan 17, 2008 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nonsense
by jscot on Jan 17, 2008 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind the kiss
by tominhawaii on Jan 17, 2008 1:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey! I'm an ex submarine sailor.
As to kissing Fizbin's wife - send me a picture.
Wait, who am I kidding. My wife would be auctioning off a custom leather coin purse and (small) flashlight sheath on E-bay if I started kissing someone else.
by timg56 on Jan 17, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They kept it close, that's a good thing
Careless turnovers/not taking care of the ball probably tops the list. Travis had 5 TO's, Brandon 4, and LMA 4. Not counted in those turnover stats are the number of times the ball got poked away and it took seconds off the shot clock to get it re-controlled at which point the Blazers had to hurry a shot up. That happened a bunch of times.
Getting pushed around...again...is on there. Seriously, where is Raef? C'mon Nate, I get taht you want LMA to take his lumps and learn, but at least let Raef soften the other team up a little. He has 6 fouls to give and he's the only guy on your team who will foul someone hard. Travis and Martell in particular need to toughen up. Freakin' deck somebody just one time to prevent a lay-up, PLEASE.
Allowing offensive rebounds...again...is on there. Maybe it's time for a practice where all you work on is blocking out your man and grabbing a rebound. This continues to haunt us. 13 offensive rebounds...
Poor floor spacing, movement, and shot selection is on there. Travis again with the fade-aways. He actually hit a few of them and finished a respectable 6 for 8 but let's be honest - some of those weren't great shot attempts - and note the 3 free throw attempts in 31 minutes of play. Go to the basket Travis. The offense last night for the most part was pretty stagnant for the first 20 seconds of the shot clock, then hectic for the last 4.
I think you can take away from this that the Blazers can play a sub-par game and still hang with a good team but other than chalking it up to a learning experience I don't know what else there is to say because I don't think there were a ton of positives.
We still have a good team. They lost against the best team in the NBA on the road. Stuff happens. Can still get 4 wins on this roadie.
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 17, 2008 7:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I could only listen to the game,
Playing at home, the Celts played hard aggresive ball on both ends of the court, Allen's shot was working and so was KG's. Their defense was what caused all those turnovers and won the game for them. Allen thought they played a hard smart game. Still, we were close at the end.
I don't know if I can be as hard on KG as some of you others. He wanted to win that game very badly and was doing everything he could to psych out our young Blazers and affect their mental approach to the game. And I think it worked to a degree. I don't know that I can fault him much for doing whatever it took within the rules to exploit a mental advantage. After all, he wasn't throwing elbows to the face ala Karl Malone, smashing a basketball into a face ala Shaq, or slamming into the back of a hot shooting player ala Ellis. So he gets a pass in my book.
by TwoDeep on Jan 17, 2008 7:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
KG been doin' dat for YEARS
WE should do what KG does, when experience and respect allows.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 17, 2008 10:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True.
After watching it first-hand, I can confirm what everyone here is saying: KG intimidated the heck out of LA last night. Remember, LA had a pretty nice first quarter when Perkins was on him, but when Doc made the switch, it was all downhill.
by game sink on Jan 17, 2008 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Your right about Jack
by CTBlazerfan on Jan 17, 2008 7:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Celtics defense
Oh yeah, on the Celtics side, Ray Allen is just as great as I remembered him, and KG is like Rasheed Wallace's evil twin. Whereas Rasheed is hilarious with his arguing, KG is just an a-hole. Also Garnett usually makes his anger a positive, where Rasheed wilts with it a bit.
by robrun2 on Jan 17, 2008 9:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This might sound dumb
Plus, the Blazers always find the perfect games to lose because there is a bounce back game coming up next against the miserable Heat.
Everything the Celtics did to us, we need to learn to do. Experience, intensity, staying confident in your own game. Some day the older Blazers will play some young whipper snapper team and they'll be in awe of us, and we'll be able to pull out a game with just our experience. But for now, this lesson is underlined with a loss, and I'm not so sure they'd learn this as quickly with a tight win.
We didn't play very well and still almost won at the Boston Gahden (is it still the Garden? Or some corpy-rate name), and that's a good sign. I'm sure the type of players we got will absorb the lessons learned.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 17, 2008 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It dosen't sound dumb !
to COINCAST's monopoly.
OBSERVATIONS -
1. The Celts 2nd half defense on the pick and roll/pick and pop was aggressive and physical.
We got bullied !
2. Travis and the boys had some HORRIBLE turnovers. Several passes to nobody. Look,
then pass, please.
3. NBA referees: Having coached, played and
watched for 30 + years; that was HORRIBLE!!!
I normally don't complain about the officiating,
but the no call at the top of the key when
Glen Davis hip checked Roy almost to the ground
right in front of the referee, was emblematic
of the aggresive Celtics getting most of the
calls. The Blazers failing to match that aggression helped determine the outcome.
4. Giving up missed free throw rebounds and key
offensive boards in the 2nd half proved the Celts
wanted the game more.
5. When the Celtics showed the aggressive doubling of the dribbler on the high pick and
roll, the Blazers should have mixed it up
with working more double screens for Martell
and James Jones. Get the Celtic defenders moving
and exerting energy without the ability to double.
6. Too many easy drives baseline for Ray Ray and
others. Martell, Travis and others need to cut
off the baseline and force the slasher to the middle and our defense.
7. This was a tough game as you know the Celts
didn't want that three game losing streak. We
learned some valuable lessons and our guys will
be determined to make a better showing in Miami.
Unfortunatly, Miami will try to bully us as well.
They do watch tape after all. We better bring
our fight with our best game.
8. Jarrett Jack played hard. Blazermaniacs know
this guy is a winner and is willing to give up
his body to get to the rim. He will get better
when he improves his defense and cuts the TO's.
COINCAST SUCKS ! BRING BACK OUR BLAZERS !
by walkoff41 on Jan 17, 2008 11:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Coincast?
by 92wastheyear on Jan 17, 2008 11:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BS
Ask Sacramento fans how they feel about Coincast.
by iDea on Jan 17, 2008 12:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What's Sacto have to do with it
by 92wastheyear on Jan 17, 2008 12:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sactown fans were screwed
As far as Verizon FIOS having the channel......I don't really have an answer, but through my limited research, I've noticed that they were the only ones to carry it in another market as well (which one is escaping me). Not sure of the tie between the two.
At any rate, it's us fans that lose.......and we have every right to be upset with the situation.
by iDea on Jan 17, 2008 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's for sale
by 92wastheyear on Jan 17, 2008 3:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Huhh ?
after having League Pass with them last year.
I watched every game as Fox Sports Northwest
had the rights to the additional games.
Not only will Coincast not sign a deal with
either sattelite provider, they won't do a deal
with Charter Communications, our only cable
company. I would be happy to PAY to see the
games but they won't take my money. They prefer
to black out all of these providers until they
get their price. Any idiot can see they know
the Blazers will be great in the next year or
two with adding GO and Rudy / Big FA summer of
09. They are going to get their price or not
provide service.
Coincast is well known around the country
as monopolistic, as evidenced by the multiple
investigations by the FCC. Please go back to your
desk at the corporate office and understand the
issues at hand.
I don't particularily blame the team
management, other than they knew who they were
getting in bed with before the deal. The
horrible part for Southern Oregon is the
Blazers don't even have a radio affiliate here
in Medford and KXL dosen't come in well.
Should we just seceed from Oregon and 30 + years
of Blazermania ? Either way NO TV at all !
by walkoff41 on Jan 17, 2008 8:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Charter is your provider!!
PS. guess what.... FSNW was charging for their channel too and Charter was paying it.
PPS. I am not at the corporate office anywhere and I contend that I do understand the issues completely.
by 92wastheyear on Jan 17, 2008 8:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I blame the Blazers
by lee3022 on Jan 17, 2008 11:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe
I mean god forbid this team face the old Kobe-Shaq Lakers. They would've wet their pants.
by jayseyfield on Jan 17, 2008 9:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think this game was perfect
Turnovers are no surprise as Boston has been doing this to other teams all year. We now know that we need to improve to compete. LMA will bounce back and playing against KG will help him to learn and grow. I am not disappointed in this game (nor Toronto) because until we adjust and grow we are not in the same class and do not deserve to win against the better teams. If we are intimidated against Boston think about playing Detroit in their place!
by lee3022 on Jan 18, 2008 12:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















