The Scoop on Rudy
With Greg Oden down and no real games distracting our attention yet, it's natural for Blazer fans to look towards the future of the squad. The most heralded event of 2008 will be Oden's return. But I couldn't help but notice that another rising star is seeping into the consciousness of the Blazer faithful. You're starting to see more and more speculation about Spanish wing Rudy Fernandez...how good he might be and what he might mean to the team next year and beyond.
Since few of us have seen Rudy play in person, I decided we needed to talk to some people who have. So here are some quotes from various sources in the know about Rudy. We asked all of them the same questions: Is he really that good? What kind of an impact do you think he will have on the NBA?
Disclaimer: Many of these responses came in a language other than English. The Blazersedge Foreign Service Department did their best to come up with accurate translations, but we cannot be held 100% responsible for the results. We apologize in advance for any small inaccuracies.
From an assistant coach on the development squad for the Spanish National Team:
From a television broadcast play-by-play man in Spain:
From an opponent on the French National Team:
From an editor of a European scouting blog:
From an Eastern Conference executive who wishes to remain anonymous:
So there you go folks. That was the best info we could dig up. It seems like there might be reason for some cautious optimism, though I'm sure Blazer fans will keep it muted as they always do. What is it about us that makes us so chronically underestimate the guys we haven't seen yet?
Anyway...now better informed and wiser, please feel free to return to your sober, placid pre-season speculation.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. Thanks to Idog1976 for putting us in touch with many of these sources. His foreign connections are truly amazing.
40 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sources
by nightbluefruit on Sep 19, 2007 12:09 AM PDT reply actions
hmmm...
Glad you noticed my signature...
Huh?
Unless you're kidding back...? I knew "Rudy > MJ" was a joke, and I liked it, but now I don't know nuthin' no mo'.
Are you really hurt by this?
not hurt...
Hmmmm...
--Dave
I thought he was saying it tongue-in-cheek too...
Huh?
The "red dot" stuff was simply making fun of a certain Eastern Conference GM who makes stupid picks and then spouts sour grapes. I doubt anyone remembered that you were the one who brought up "red dot" arguments.
To connect the dots :) between "red dots" and your signature, Dave would have had to actually be thinking specifically about you, go back to read all your posts, and figure out how to stick it to you. If you really believe he did that, then you probably better just go to another forum. If you don't, then you ought to just accept that he wasn't talking about you specifically and not take it personally. You are an important part of this forum, but not THAT important, that he would pursue you personally.
This was intended to be fun, rather than gloomy, and get past all the Oden despair. It wasn't about you, it was about fans having fun, dreaming and hoping about the future, and laughing at ourselves.
Fans do this kind of stuff. We want Oden to be the next Russell, LMA to be the next Rasheed without the attitude (or better), Roy to be the next Walt Frazier, JJ to be the next Terry Porter (at least), etc. It's fun, but there's a funny side to it as well. That's what this post is all about.
Besides, the best part of the whole post was the cigarette ashes, which is nothing to do with anything you said.
I didnt post anything about red dots...
OK
Yeah, he did poke fun at your signature, but since I thought A) the post was in fun and B) your signature was in fun, I also thought your first response was not serious, and that he was just still playing the game.
Just one question, and then I'll drop out. Does RUDY > MJ mean he's better than Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, or both? Because that would solve our PG problem, wouldn't it?
Well I can't speak for Dave but...
I was thinking about all the threads where people said that even though I never saw an original post where someone actually said those words. If I associate it with anyone I associate it with his rotundness who is on the way out and the blog was partially a joke for his sake since he is leaving. If anything this is teasing the folks who say that Rudy is NOT the next MJ even though to my knowledge nobody ever HAS said that.
I can say with near certainty that Dave was not ripping on you or anyone but rather as others have said the next big thing phenomena (hence the obvious GO red dot references) and the silliness of comparing anyone to MJ. Perhaps especially a white guy from europe who, while graceful, could not lace up the sneakers of his airness.
So really don't be offended man. It was meant to be a joke and not directed at anyone just a bit of fun to take the edge off or originally pre-injury to kill the Boredom. Oden sort of stole the thunder or was that Thor...
Myemic, I don't know if you realize it
Hell, I thought it was a serious piece until I got to the center of the French National team. But it really wasn't until the cigarette ash line that I realized I'd been had.
I'm reminded of an old saying my mom often used. "If the shoe fits, wear it."
Haha!
Seriously though... wtf is with the talk of this guy being the next MJ? I dont get to watch a lot of TV, but I do browse the sports pages online, and wouldnt there be a little more hype to him if he was SOOOO great?
Fatty Said It
I think he'll be a cool player, and a great backup at least. But, yeah, the MJ talk is just people funnin' with crack-me-ups.
Plus Rudy smokes too much to really make an impact in the NBA.
Mortimer
You had me going
Funny
It's too bad that myemic23 took it the wrong way. Unfortunately, it's easy for email/blog communication--especially humor--to go awry because words on a screen can easily be misinterpreted. I'm sure Dave of all people meant no insult to anybody--either by the post or his comment on myemic's signature.
This GO injury seems to have us all a bit on edge. Maybe we should get together and attend a grief meeting. :-) (I've resorted to the dreaded smiley face for clarity.)
Well, you can't please everyone...
Keep up the good work.
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Sep 19, 2007 6:14 AM PDT reply actions
All I know,
This proves that
Now that fatty is muzzled, and based on Dave's previous statements that a jerk is good for for circulation, Dave has resorted to a new literary devive not previously seen here.
Rush Limbaugh humor.
by ojala on Sep 19, 2007 7:53 AM PDT reply actions
I'm so glad to finally have a scouting report!
Honestly, what threw me off was how Dave was able to contact the Spanish National team's assistant coach and then their play-by-play guy. For a minute, I was like "Man, Dave's really blowing up on an international scale! He's almost as world reknown as fatty..."
Ironically, what if Rudy DID become the next MJ? Bill Simmons could write an article about how we missed MJ with the first pick but got him later in the first round.
Suck it East Coast!
by Champs2009 on Sep 19, 2007 8:44 AM PDT reply actions
I'm going to come to your defense
But we have to remember ... it is Dave's site and a high quality one at that. He is entitled to call the shots.
Guys it was a joke
I saw this reel on you tube
It was awesome.
Rudy for MVP
Who is this Shecky Gruberman?
Nice post, I think Blazer fans as a whole needed to lighten up. Including of course myself.
Had me going in the
by creepbblazed on Sep 19, 2007 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
I gotta admit
And, yes, it does prove that fatty is Dave.
Does it matter?
by sohrab19 on Sep 19, 2007 1:50 PM PDT reply actions
Intent can be difficult to interpret in text...
The Secret Cause of Flame Wars
Stephen Leahy
"Don't work too hard," wrote a colleague in an e-mail today. Was she sincere or sarcastic? I think I know (sarcastic), but I'm probably wrong.
According to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I've only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they've correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time.
"That's how flame wars get started," says psychologist Nicholas Epley of the University of Chicago, who conducted the research with Justin Kruger of New York University. "People in our study were convinced they've accurately understood the tone of an e-mail message when in fact their odds are no better than chance," says Epley.
The researchers took 30 pairs of undergraduate students and gave each one a list of 20 statements about topics like campus food or the weather. Assuming either a serious or sarcastic tone, one member of each pair e-mailed the statements to his or her partner. The partners then guessed the intended tone and indicated how confident they were in their answers.
Those who sent the messages predicted that nearly 80 percent of the time their partners would correctly interpret the tone. In fact the recipients got it right just over 50 percent of the time.
"People often think the tone or emotion in their messages is obvious because they 'hear' the tone they intend in their head as they write," Epley explains.
At the same time, those reading messages unconsciously interpret them based on their current mood, stereotypes and expectations. Despite this, the research subjects thought they accurately interpreted the messages nine out of 10 times.
The reason for this is egocentrism, or the difficulty some people have detaching themselves from their own perspective, says Epley. In other words, people aren't that good at imagining how a message might be understood from another person's perspective.
"E-mail is very easy to misinterpret, which not only triggers flame wars but lots of litigation," says Nancy Flynn, executive director of the e-Policy Institute and author of guidebooks E-Mail Rules and Instant Messaging Rules. Many companies battle workplace lawsuits triggered by employee e-mail, according to Flynn.
People write absolutely, incredibly stupid things in company e-mails," said Flynn.
I love
Years ago, before email software packages were available, an individual in our very large company wrote one himself that was used company wide. What a new revelation! But messages and meanings of those message got quite misconstrued because you couldn't see facial expressions or hear voice tones; at that point in time, many people weren't aware of this specific defect regarding telecommunications. But your post shows that time has enlightened us. Still, we need to keep this deficiency in mind in our daily email communications.
Don't get me wrong ... email is a wonderful technology, but you just can't beat facemail with phone communication coming in a close second.
I sometimes get e-mails from
i was beginning tyo worry about you sir
Key to sarcasm/sense of humor
I hope to one day post something so legendary, Dave will make fun of me in a post.
By the way Dave, that was a well written post. You drew me in with the topic and the first quote and then slayed me with the rest. Thanks for the laugh at the joke and myself for not getting it sooner.
Rudy with Brandon Roy?
Not they are the same player just because they are both from europe but Roy with Sergio was essentially Roy's best on individual stats but basically the worst team result on any player pair with Roy. http://www.82games.com/0607/0607PORP.HTM
Will Rudy with Roy work at team level? If it does that will be significant long-run development. If it doesnt Rudy can still try to make the SG backup role work or be PG with a different partner.
I also wonder how much SF Roy ends up playing this season.
Shoots
I do not have time to find it now, but I saw video of Rudy dunking over Sabonis. It was spectacular.

by 



















