Expectations: Joel Przybilla
Let's turn to another guy on our roster who will raise a ton of questions (at least until the season starts): Joel Przybilla.
The Vanilla Gorilla became an immediate fan favorite three years ago with his dominant shot-blocking and feisty rebounding. He single-handedly altered certain games with his defense. The list of centers who can do that isn't terribly long. If you're looking for a defensive specialist who can eat minutes and doesn't need to touch the ball (maybe shouldn't touch the ball) Joel's the guy.
The positive section should be longer than that for such a solid guy but last season was nothing short of disastrous. First he gets kneed in the Manbacks and misses several weeks. Then he comes back and starts but plays half the minutes he's used to due to foul trouble and coaching preferences. Through the middle of the season they practically could have invented a new box score designation for him: DNPM-CI (Did Not Play Much--Coach's Indifference). Then after amassing a less-than-heroic 2 points and 4 rebounds a game he gets injured again and shuffles off into oblivion. He's not exactly on an upswing heading into the season.
To be honest, though, before we ask what we can expect of Joel this year we have to ask whether it matters. Greg Oden has arrived. I don't say that with gushing fan-man-love but simply as a matter of fact. Oden will start this year. If he's not starting on opening night (hard to imagine) he'll be starting soon after. Lamarcus Aldridge is going to be an absolute minutes hog and he plays some center in a smaller lineup. That smaller lineup is all but assured with the presence of Channing Frye. Joel's 16.2 minute per game average last year was a major disappointment. Barring injury or constant foul trouble from the other front line players he may not even get that many this year.
If you get past that hurdle you have to ask whether Joel can compensate for what he lacks on the court. The most obvious drawback is his offense. Yes he's a career 53% shooter but that's kind of misleading. He really shouldn't be touching the ball. He doesn't catch it well, he can't pass well, and you hold your breath when he tries to score if it's not a slam dunk. He knows it, his teammates know it, the coaches know it, and more to the point the opposition knows it. Every coach in the league will say publicly that they'd love to have a Joel Przybilla on their team but they're telling a half truth. The other half of the truth is that playing with him means playing offense 4-on-5 which is a major defensive break for the other side. Players like Zach Randolph increase the defensive burden for everyone playing alongside them. Joel increases the offensive burden for his teammates. That's part of the reason he's not high on the coach's list. (And if last year is any indication he isn't.)
When Joel isn't feeling it he has a tendency to disappear even on defense. Several times last year he was slow rotating for what should have been bread-and-butter plays for him. Worse yet, when he's consistently behind plays he picks up an amazing array of fouls. Add to that the fact that he's not as good of an individual defender as he is a help guy and you have a nasty trifecta working against him unless he's on time and full of energy.
One thing Joel will bring to the team that we desperately need is toughness. He's not exactly Rocky VII: The Minnesota Mauler but he'll get in people's faces a lot more than most of the current Blazers. That may be a key to him finding minutes, however sparse.
After last year and given the current makeup of the team I'm going to be happy with any positive contribution we get from Joel. I think it's critical for him to come into camp in great shape and ready to leave it all out there on the court. He needs his old quickness back if he's going to contribute which leaves no room for extra weight. I think we could see some offensive heartbeat--albeit a faint one--if Steve Blake gets playing time alongside him. Blake will see the cracks in the sagging defense and help Joel take advantage. I'm anticipating a decent upswing in defensive rebounding anyway without Joel so I doubt he'll be a savior there. His main role may be pulverizing Greg Oden in practice, though I doubt that's a job description he's going to relish. No matter how, when, or why he gets his chance if Joel doesn't produce some tangible numbers outside of the personal foul column he's going to be glued to the bench all season long. Which brings us around to our first question again: will that matter or will it be an asterisk to our season?
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
100 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Expectations: Joel Przybilla
This is going to be
Joel has a role
joel has been injured a lot
my prediction is that he'll get injured in practice.
I expect
By mid-season, Oden will be more comfortable with what he can and can't do, the coaches will be more comfortable with what Oden can and can't do, and Pryz will be traded. At 4-5 we'll have a three man rotation of Oden, LMA, and Frye, with Raef and McRob filling in here and there, and covering garbage time.
Pryz will be packaged before the trading deadline with one of Martell/Outlaw/Jones and one of Jack/Sergio to get us a good quality SF. That will free two roster spots, and if Freeland isn't getting time in Europe, he'll be brought over to take one of them, play development league, and be on standby in case of injury.
Every time I hear about how we are going
What quality SF do people imagine will be available?
Josh Howard?
Tayshaun Prince?
Luol Deng?
Caron Butler?
Andre Iguodala?
That's who makes my short list of quality SF's. I don't see any of these guys changing addresses soon.
Rashard Lewis? - Not that I'd want him, but he just signed with Orlando. They aren't going to trade him come mid-season.
Ron Artest? - I actually like Ron-Ron, but I don't think so.
I can think of 4 guys that could possibly be available:
Richard Jefferson - He has 4 years at $12 to $15 mil a year. With his injury history and his type of game, I think he's a risk. Miles could probably duplicate his performance at half the price.
Andri Kirilenko - In some ways he might be a good fit, bringing defense and hustle. But he's got 4 years left at $13 mil to $18 mil and can we be assured he'll be happy being the 4th or 5th option?
Shawn Marion? - I like Marion a lot, even though he too has a high salary tag, it's only for 2 more years. Two problems here. Does he accept being the third option (at best) on offense? And why does Phoenix trade him other than for cap relief? Meaning they are going to want expiring contracts.
That leaves Yi what's his name. We don't know that he's "quality" yet and if he is, why would Milwaukie want trade him?
So just who is this "quality" SF we are going to be getting?
We don't need a star
He doesn't have to be great at any of those things, just solid. Maybe James Jones can be that guy, but Travis and Martell aren't there yet, if ever. If Jones steps up, great. If he doesn't, this is our biggest weakness, and we aren't going to be a contender until we upgrade from "weak" to "at least competitive" at SF.
great & neglected point
we need to target teams
by sohrab19 on Aug 24, 2007 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions
A pleasant surprise
He's one of the few players on the team without potential. We know what we could get, the only question is whether we'll get it.
His likely biggest contribution to the team this year is to be the injury magnet, attracting those injuries that would befall Oden, LMA, and Frye if Joel is not on the team by using his karma to inhale the injury bug.
by jon @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 5:08 AM PDT reply actions
It depends on which Joel shows up
Hopefully, it's the 'vanilla gorilla' that bruises other teams instead of guy with bruised...manliness.
Oden is only 19 and may have an affinity for fouls so Pryz could be needed especially in the first 3rd of the season. And Oden having a practice partner like Pryz is a big plus as well.
If he's playing well, that helps portland a lot. And to be blunt, it would also increase his trade value.
I don't know if KP is entertaining the idea of trading him, but I'd guess that he's noticed that Joel is due 6.8 million in the year portland is planning on cap space.
Exactly my feelings on Joel
by drawingjeremy on Aug 24, 2007 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions
You need more than three bigs in the NBA.
by EnglandDan on Aug 24, 2007 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
3 + 2 + more, we'd be OK w/o foul trouble
Many promoted shipping Joel off once we landed Oden, and I along with many others argued that we will need Joel because of foul trouble, even before we saw Oden in summer league. This is why I said Joel will be necessary for at least the first 1/3 to 1/2 of the season.
However, if our main 3 bigs aren't fouling out constantly, I don't think it would be premature to begin shopping Joel if the right offer presented itself, but not before that time rolls around. Remember we have McRoberts and Freeland who both may join us at some point, probably not this season. If we can move Joel once we are fairly confident that foul trouble won't be a killer I'd go for it while we can, soon enough we will look desperate to move 4s in particular, and we know how well that went with Zach. Plus if Darius is earning any minutes he'll also be included in the forward portion of the mix).
I don't disagree that you need 4 bigs, I just think we have that covered if our Oden, LMA, and Frye are able to stay in the game. Injuries hurt teams when they happen, and we should expect that to be the case. Lafrentz will do when necessary, or others picking up the slack at the 4 with LMA or Frye covering the 5.
by drawingjeremy on Aug 24, 2007 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't believe...
There is a LOT he can bring to the table on this team. He can be a strong locker room presence, a strong mentor for Oden and Aldridge, a second team defensive presence, and, as mentioned, a practice foil for Oden.
Here's a fact: Joel is almost certainly in the top half of all centers in the league, though this probably speaks as much to the sorry state of centers right now as it does to Joel's effectiveness. Going against him day after day in practice can be nothing but a good thing for Oden.
Joel will be back, either as a backup in Portland or as a starter elsewhere. Book it. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 6:34 AM PDT reply actions
Right...
Everyone agrees he cannot shoot, pass, run, jump - who needs that silly stuff in basketball? OK, some other centers have the same problem. But Joel was also the weakest 7'1" rebounder in the league last year. Great in the locker room? Fine. Just keep him off the court please.
The point is arguable...
The center position in the NBA is not strong right now.
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Most of the Joel-dislikers
...probably started becoming fans last year. They probably didn't see the Joel that we know and love.
Having seen him during his breakout year, I know for a fact that Joel is a top-notch defensive player and a smart offensive player who knows his limitations and will not go outside of them. He is the best pick-setter on the team and is much maligned for his foul propensity, although it appears that the refs do not respect him one iota.
I hope Joel is on the Blazers for a long time.
In fairness to Jim...
It's an honest difference of opinion. If you are going to base everything that is Joel on last year, you're going to come away thinking he sucks.
I think there's a lot more to the story. The guy ain't Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, but he ain't Benoit Benjamin, either.
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Let's not forget the fouls
You left out something important, Dave:
You are
--Dave
Sergio made Magloire look competent in the P&R
by EnglandDan on Aug 24, 2007 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
webted beat me to it
He appeared to have bad hands
Now that they've played together, Joel will be much better.
that reminds me...
I think I was at the same game
Lots of optimism around Joel
Does Joel start? Not a chance. This team just won the biggest lottery since LeBron came out, and they're not going to start their shiny new guy? Oden is going to start, because he's also a good defensive center with more offensive capabilities than Prz. Also, He's THE FUTURE.
"OK," you say, "He'll be the sixth man. He'll lock it down while Oden is out of the game." Nice try. This team is about THE FUTURE, and another piece of the future arrived this summer in Channing Frye. Again, good defensive big, and more than capable of carrying some load on offense.
Moreover, take a look at the personnel on this second unit--Jack (or Blake), Sergio, Martell, Outlaw (or James), Frye, Przybilla. Five of those guys are guys who would thrive in an up-tempo game. One is not. And that one will probably be rolled out to guard the Shaqs and Yaos of the world when Oden racks up some fouls. The rest of the time, though, I think he'll be used pretty sparingly.
I would not be surprised at all, if Oden, Aldridge, and Frye prove capable of carrying the load early on, to see Przybilla shipped out at some point in the season. His contract and timeline don't fit the plan, and his game is more limited than the three players in front of him.
The thing is...
Actually, I didn't actually read Dave's post before I responded. I only read it afterward. But I do appreciate the proliferation of the Manback brand.
by HarryManback on Aug 24, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
He is odd man out
Somewhere during the season one of the 3 bigs will get hurt and that will be when he can get his minutes.
There are teams that need a back up center, but I do not see them offering any value for Joel so we are probably stuck with him this year (not a bad thing). There will be a span of probably 10 to 15 games over the season that he will probably get 20 or more minutes due to matchups, injury or fouls and we will be glad we have him, but I do not see him as part of the primary rotation.
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 24, 2007 8:26 AM PDT reply actions
eh?
Although a few people here have hijacked the post pining for a "quality" small forward, and they see Joel as a means to an end, ummm..., well, uummm....ain't gonna happen. I hope not too many brain cells were sacrificed coming up with that nugget...
Another mystery musing is the concept of Frye as a good defensive big. ehhh?? Made me choke on my coffee.
Last season, Magloire took over for Przy...This season, I'd expect Joel to take Maggot's role without the late season playing time gifts...Big stiff with limited offensive skills providing enforcement when needed...
by blacknoise on Aug 24, 2007 8:31 AM PDT reply actions
feisty rebounding?????
I believe he would be a much more serviceable player if he got less blocks but more rebounds (preventing o-boards at the same time). That would make him valuable against teams with strong offensive centers and a good defensive game changer off the bench. He could even be a starter on a very defensively minded team (Larry Brown where are you?).
For now, he is a great back-up, and Oden will be limited in minutes for much of the season.
He was free to go for blocks
Look for his rebounds per minute to go up substantially this year.
Joel Backer
Yes, except for TIMG56, no one mentioned how he is is the best pick setter on the team. When he was paired with Nick VanExel, he was working the pick and roll to perfection and was providing a steady contribution to the offense. If Nate doesn't want to use him this way - and I'd have no idea why not - he's missing out.
Until Oden gets things figured out, Joel will be our best defensive prescence on the floor. And yes, his mental and physical toughness will be welcome. To me, Joel's only major downside is his horrible free throw shooting. There is a lot of upside to compensate however. Most seem to be forgetting this upside. It also seems that all it takes is for an influential person or two to express an opinion and the majority jump on the bandwagon (sorry about the word choice)and continue the sentiment - a pessimistic one in this case. I feel that's what's happening here.
Of course, I may be proven wrong.
Actually,
With the right point guard, I can see Joel getting 8 - 10 points a night. Particularly if Aldridge is drawing double teams.
If we have the 2005 Joel, or better yet, a slightly improved version, then I think there is at least a 50% chance of seeing him in the starting lineup on opening night. How long he stays there is anybody's guess. I would not bet on him being the starter at the end of the season.
Sorry webtd!
twodeep is right on
Here's what I expect from Joel.
What I would like from Joel is to be a lynchpin in a second unit that features our young players that we are looking to develop. Rodriguez, Webster, Outlaw, Frye and Przybilla as an entire unit with an offense designed for those players. Pick and roll with El Mago and Przybilla with Frye and Webster as shooters and Outlaw being active. I want these guys to play a ton together until they all know what the others are thinking on the floor. I think a bench mob would be afantastic development for this team, and I bet Nate doesn't do it.
by EnglandDan on Aug 24, 2007 9:59 AM PDT reply actions
There's a lot to a coach.
Bad things about Nate, flexibility of game plan, ability to adapt himself to player's strengths.
There's more good than bad with Nate but he isn't perfect.
by EnglandDan on Aug 24, 2007 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Joel's a nice backup
C'mon give the guy the ball back every now and then on some of those picks!
Joel will contribute
Then there was the double whammy of Magliore joining the team. By Joel's own admission, he played all season looking over his shoulder, because he couldn't understand why he was starting in front of JM. As McMillan explained in a post-season interview, he didn't like the slow, lane-clogging combo of JM and Zach playing together. But from Joel's perspective, it was, "This guy's clearly better than me; he's killing me in practice. Any day now he's going to take my job." Between that and the injury, Joel lost his mojo and just had a bad year.
This season, all that will be behind Joel. With the passage of time, the trauma of the injury has faded. And he won't be looking over his shoulder anymore; he'll have a clearly defined role as back-up and mentor to the 19-year old franchise center. In my opinion, Joel is ideally suited--if somewhat overpaid--for that role. He's a genuinely nice, team-first player. And he's a tough guy on a team that's short on toughness at this stage.
To those who think Joel's only real usefulness will be in practice, I'd suggest they review tape of those summer league games. Sure, Oden was run down and sick. But he picked up fouls in bunches--as you'd expect a rookie shotblocker to do. Particularly early in the season, Oden will go to the bench with foul trouble early and often, and Joel will see plenty of minutes. If he plays well--as I think he will--his trade value will go up. So by the time Oden no longer needs a mentor, the Blazers can move Joel--and his big contract--elsewhere. Which will be a win-win for Joel and the Blazers.
Thrilla named Pryzbilla?
For once, I find myself whole-heartedly disagreeing with the generally positive comments after an "Expectations" post.
First off, I need to pose a question to the well-educated reader base of Blazers Edge: What makes a player a defensive specialist? Thinking back, I remember Gary Payton being the first player I remember being called a "defensive specialist" in the sense that he was a SPECIAL defensive player. He locked up his man and threw away the key. But we all know, GP was no slouch on either end of the floor during his prime. Now, when I see "defensive specialist," I think "can't throw a basketball into a hula hoop."
Somewhere between here and there, "defensive specialist" became the term given to the players who were absolutely worthless on the offensive end. When did this happen? And more importantly, does anyone else feel this way? It's kind of like the new "Kobe Stopper" for those that remember the Reuben Patterson era.
This all gets back to the point of my expectations for Joel Pryzbilla, seriously, it does. After getting "kicked in the Manbacks" (or having his nuts cracked), Joel flat-out lost his intensity on the defensive end. He no longer elevated for blocks, he would hesitate on rotations, and he would allow opposing players (even relative slouches like Samuel Dalembert and Chris Wilcox) to gain position extremely low on the block which is essentially the worst possible scenario for a low-post defender. Face it, if Joel doesn't bring 200% on the defensive end, he's not worth having on the floor because as previously stated, he's about as worthless as you can get on the offensive side.
Then, after having an extremely disappointing season, the Blazers land the #1 pick and the greatest center prospect since Dwight Howard. How does this effect Joel? He's already got to be down on himself after last season, and now the light at the end of the tunnel is being a backup for a rookie- who is younger, more agile, more athletic, and eventually, will be 10,000% more effective on the offensive end.
Still, I find myself thinking Joel will succeed (in a limited role). We knew we had the best back-up center in the league when we signed Pryzbilla to that expensive contract. It was no secret. But now, Joel will actually be a backup center. He'll be able to come off the bench for about 15-20 minutes per game, play with energy, and most likely, pad his stats by playing against lower quality competition (the opposing team's second line). Sergio should be able to get Pryzbilla some cheap points, if they play together, because Joel's one strength on the offensive end is setting the initial high screen in the pick-and-roll. He'll also be able to grab some cheap rebounds, both on the offensive and defensive end, because he'll be fresh.
But how important is it to have "the best (or one of the best) backup centers in the NBA"? Nazr Mohammed is an adequate backup for the Pistons, and he rarely plays. Who backs up Tim Duncan or Amare Stoutemire? If Greg Oden is who we think he is, then Pryzbilla's impact on the general well-being of the team (in the future) will be very limited. For next season, he'll have the important role of relieving Oden when he's either tired or in foul trouble (which probably isn't a great role considering Pryzbilla averages 2.9 fouls in 16 minutes) but in long term playoff scenarios, Pryzbilla will find himself glued to the bench.
More than anything, I hope Greg Oden, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Channing Frye all use Pryzbilla as a "defensive specialist" in practice, so that they all improve their respective offensive arsenals. But I don't know how Joel will react to being the team's practice test dummy.
by Champs2009 on Aug 24, 2007 11:23 AM PDT reply actions
Also...
Seriously, our team needs a rough-and-tough, Minnesota man who ice fishes with his bare hands and will kill a man for even THINKING about going soft in the paint. Right now, we have a 7'0 tall Billy Elliot.
by Champs2009 on Aug 24, 2007 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Disagree
Not so. He isn't a go-to type player but he knows his limitations and works within them.
The thing you're leaving out, Champs, is that it is extremely difficult to get into the NBA. Everyone provides value in one way or another. So to say that someone who is a 'defensive specialist' means that they are a sub-par basketball player is not looking at the whole story. You get three-point specialists who can't play much D--very one-dimensional--and yet they are widely accepted as having a role.
Przy's role is similar in that he does not have an offensive go-to move, but the other things he does--moves the ball, sets picks, offensive rebounds--free up the guys who are relied on to score. You aren't playing a 4 on 5 game. In fact, I would say that Zach Randolph did less for the Blazers on offense than Joel Przybilla when he wasn't handling the ball. He just stood there and waited for it to come to him. You don't want 5 guys who want the ball all the time.
Sure, he's no Sabas, but he can be (and will be) an important piece to the Blazers future.
back in the 80s
dennis rodman certainly qualifies.
going back even further, what else was wesley unseld? he was a defensive rebounding fool who rarely cared to score, played center at 6'7". paul silas on 1970s boston and paul westphal-led phoenix also did nothing but rebound and play defense.....with no flash whatsoever. but he was part of winning teams.
k.c. jones and satch sanders of the classic boston teams were defensive specialists. i'm sure theres many more i dont know about or never saw.
All I want out of Joel
toughness and confidence
I like Pryzbilla as a player and as a mentor to Oden.
I agree and...
by jon @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Thrilla deserves slack
He should be putting up 300 jump hooks from each side and 500 10 foot jumpers every day. He's only what, 25? Joel still fits the timeline here and can be solid with the second unit if he brings the toughness/blocks from '05-'06 and develops a three shot arsenal so as not to be a complete liability on O (He got the two hand slam down). He rallies for 7pts, 7brds, and 2 blocks this year if things go well. A no show without cause? Then he should be re-located.
by Atomic Dog 71 on Aug 24, 2007 12:49 PM PDT reply actions
Joel..Joel....Joel
If Joel can succeed in a 10-20 mpg role i can see him easily living out his contract in portland, maybe even picking up an extension. Worst case, he succeeds and we are able to trade him for a high draft pick or another near all star caliber veteran presence.
DNPM-CI
Joel will be way, way down in the rotation unless there are lots of other DNPM-CI decisions made with other players. And the CIs not only include Coach's Indifference, but also Coach's Intolerance (of rookie or rookie-like mistakes); Coach's Incompetence (failing to be a good "teaching coach"); and Coach's Impatience (not letting players play through mistakes).
Oden should start and play as much as possible and Nate should play (and tolerate mistakes by) the other young players rather than playing veterans who might make fewer mistakes. (I think he overplayed Udoka, Magloire, Randolf, and even Roy rather than having other players develop their game on the floor).
If, indeed, the Blazers go with the full bore youth movement, I think Pryzbilla will see very little time on the floor. (Even if Oden is a fouling machine, Pryzbilla won't get much time as he gets fouls at a prodigious rate.)
While I like Joel's work ethic, I think coming up with "expectations" is relatively pointless since the various DNPM-CI factors will dictate the fate (and expectations) for all the players, but especially for those deep in the rotation.
Tight rotation
The rest of the team will get some minutes based on unique match ups and injuries. This is what good teams do to win and although we talk about getting playing time for the young guys, it is dangerous to have a team do anything but try to win, it develops the wrong attitude, you must earn your minutes. More important than getting everybody minutes is to develop a winning attitude and that there is no acceptance for losing in Portland. True champions hate loosing more than the want to win.
My thoughts on the rotation would be as follows:
C - Oden
PF - LA
SF - Outlaw
2G - Roy
PG - Blake
Bench:
Jack for both PG and 2G
Jones for SF, sometimes 2G
Frye for PF and LA will move to center
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 24, 2007 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
If you are correct,
by EnglandDan on Aug 27, 2007 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd like to see anyone try
Let me tell you how it is going to be
Raef LaFrentz - starting PF
Darius Miles - starting SF
Martell Webster - starting SG
Taurean Green - starting PG
And you can take that to the bank. I don't know who would cash it, but you can try taking it to the bank just to see what they would give you. Maybe a magnet or pen.
I think Joel will be one of the first guys off the bench because of GO's foul trouble. I don't think he'll be traded because you need lots of bigs in the west, even with Shaq in the east. How much money did the Blazers spend on all those guys who just sat on the end of he bench like Purdue and Dudley?
Just got back from the bank.
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Aug 24, 2007 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions
mr.pryzbilla
Joel Last Year?
No Joel will never be mistaken for an offensive powerhouse, but I also wouldn't say when he is healthy and on the court we are playing 4 on 5 offensively. 2 seasons ago, I seemed to remember Joel being pretty effective in the pick and roll. Also Joel sets great picks for his fellow teammates.
I'm also not 100% convinced Oden starts the season. Yes, Oden is the future, but the future is not now. Given his "fouling" trouble in summer league, Joels potential role is much larger. 2-3 years from now, yes, Joel should be our solid back-up, or something has gone wrong. But for this upcoming season? Joel could have a pretty large role, in playing center while Oden develops and mentoring Oden on the court, in practice, and off the court in the N.B.A..
Yep
Harrington did not have an O-line in Detroit but it still takes time for rookies to adjust to real game speed. I think the Spurs with Duncan could be considered an aggressive pack of wolves. Therefore, I can also see G.O. easing into the starting line up after a few weeks.
I do not think the Blazers should coddle G.O., even though he is only 19, he is a man, and he made the decision to go pro after a year of college. But there is some logic to giving him time to adjust to the NBA before he becomes a starter. His body will probably suffer more abuse this year than any other rookie in his class.
Nate will have an interesting dilemnia...
I realize that the circumstances were different, but I think it's illustrative to consider how Nate handled Martell in '05.
Despite the folks clamoring to see Martell play, Nate continually stated that he "just wanted him to enjoy himself out there." He repeatedly explained that he didn't want Martell to be under a lot of pressure to produce - especially given the "unrealistic" expectations he faced. He kept him out of pretty much everything short of complete blowouts. Some of that, of course, is because Martell was obviously not ready for the NBA game. But a lot of it was Nate wanting to maintain Martell's confidence as an aid to his future development. After all, the team sucked, and Martell could have gained a lot of experience getting whooped by NBA starters.
Despite the fact that Greg is older, been under much greater public scrutiny and is generally more NBA-ready than Martell, I still think you can expect Nate to be leery of just throwing Greg out on the floor as a starter and running him for long minutes.
To get to the point, I'm sure everyone goes into camp with a shot at winning a starting spot and place in the rotation. But, I suspect that Greg will be under a little more scrutiny and expected to show a little bit more than an equivalent veteran player. That could be enough of an edge to warrant playing Joel a lot more than we saw last season.
I don't know if it wins him a starting spot, but here's what it boils down to: if Greg and Joel look equally capable of contributing (NOW, not even two weeks into the future) at the end of training camp, Joel gets the nod because Nate wants to lower the expectations on Greg.
And I sincerely hope that Greg learns to set picks as well as Joel. That'll create about 5 million bucks worth of inducement for a top-notch free agent down the road.
-t
Underestimate Mr. Oden
To say the Blazers need to protect him is backwards, we need to try to figure out a way to protect the rest of the NBA. When you talk about not rushing somebody, that may apply to normal 19 year olds but you do not understand how special this guy is both phyiscally and mentally. Take the top 5 out of the mix and who is going to give him trouble? You also have to remember he has a month of training camp and preseason to learn as well.
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 24, 2007 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions
It will be interesting
limited mentaliliy
Greg Odens testing, his history of winning and his performance in pressure situations like the NCAA championships. Combined with the opionion of perfessionals that do nothing but eat and breath basketball should provide a better insight into what he will do rather than looking at 2 games he played when he was sick.
But if you would rather always look for problems and mistakes (even if you have to create them) then go ahead and nitpick and spend you time looking for any opportunity to point out the negative. The rest of us will just spend our time enjoying life and our Blazers.
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 24, 2007 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Oden in college
I'm not sure how Oden got annointed so quickly when he really hasn't done much. Yes, we all know he's a beast physically, but I don't think we can speculate too much on his future until we've seen him in NBA action. Can he block Duncan's bank shot? Can he prevent Kobe Bryant from posterizing him? Can he handle the faster NBA pace where nearly every player is strong? The NBA is littered with former college greats struggling for backup minutes.
I'm not second guessing Portland picking him first overall because he has a pretty high ceiling. However, I would bring him along slowly until the All-Star break so that he can adjust to the NBA.
Oden
Pryzbilla will have an absolute minimum role this season. Frye will get the majority of the backup 4 and 5 minutes, or at least he should. I would even venture that Raef should be getting whatever minutes are left. He used to be a pretty solid shot blocker himself. Joel simply is one of the many unfortunate contracts we handed out. Hopefully we aren't that unlucky with Outlaw and Blake.
The mistake really was to hand out these extremely long contracts to marginal players. That's the biggest mistake. I realize Pryz had 2 good seasons, but he shouldn't have gotten a deal longer than 3 years. Teams really need to mitigate their risk. And that's exactly what pritchard was able to do with the Blake and Outlaw signings. If they god-forbid turn out to be signings on the level of Ratliff or Randolph, we're not tied down for 6 or 7 years. There was no reason we needed to give a marginal center like Pryz that much financial security. Only star players should really be getting long 6 to 7 year contracts.
Brandon Roy
Could not agree more
We are lucky to have Oden and LA, which secures our center position for the next 10 years.
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 25, 2007 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions
There is no room for
Not qite ROFLMAOAAPMP. But did bring a little water to my eyes.
The room is actually, very wide.
That is not why you are limited
What I would like to see is your explenation on why those 2 preseason games are so important to what we can expect. Why should we put any so much stock in a single event, or if it is more than that single event then what else concerns you. That way we are able to comment on your logic and it is nolonger just a negative comment.
by lonevoiceofreason on Aug 25, 2007 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Blazer fans underrating oden...
It IS interesting to me that everyone is so incredibly high on LMA and so down on Oden though....I mean, LMA had some SPECTACULAR games toward the end of last season but he generally followed those up with a considerably lesser one. Take a look at the game logs for Aldridge -- http://www.nba.com/playerfile/lamarcus_aldridge/game_by_game_stats.html -- see? He never put together back to back all star like games yet the general consensus seems to be that he's a fringe all star THIS year. I'm not saying he WON'T (my fingers are like triple crossed) but c'mon...also compare LMA's college stats and general achievements with Oden's....then remember that Oden was playing one handed....
Meanwhile, super consistant, ultra poised and ever improving Brandon Roy seems vastly underrated by the throng. I firmly believe that after this season (assuming he's healthy) people will regard Roy as highly as they regard Deron Williams and Chris Paul.
As for the Pryz: my expectations are minimal. He's a nice guy, he's big, and seemingly always injured.
couldnt agree more
ps this has been pointed out several times, but Roy only got better as the season went on(check monthly stats). I just dont see why people think he has some sort of limited ceiling and is already close to meeting it. Its a baffler to me.
Personal attack alert! Personal attack alert!
Waaaaa, waaaaa ... I'm going to tell Dave on you. And you'll be in big trouble then. (:
In case you didn't know, using personal affronts as weak attempts to prove that your thoughts are better than another's is strongly discouraged on this blog.
By the way, I didn't elucidate on my point as it has been discussed thoroughly here many times. Oden's shortened 1 year college career was certainly not dominating, nor was his performance in the NCAA game against Ohio State which Oden's team LOST. For comparison to a truely dominating college performance, try Walton's 95%(21 for 22) shooting in the 1973 national title game. Oh, and his team won.
I submit that Oden's disappointing two games against mostly inexperienced professionals probably reveals more than the mediocre season he had playing against amateur's. And if you think I'm limited mentally because I have a few reservations regarding Oden's less than sensational season and horrible pro debut, then ok.
I've always attempted to look at the world from a somewhat realistic standpoint. But I've incurred your wrath because my objectivity right now does not allow me to live in a fantasy dream world where Greg will be all world when there is not YET any solid evidence of this happening. But if you must, go ahead and express your opinions on a personal level if that's what makes you feel good. Really though, I think you'd be more confortable posting on the Oregon Live forum.
TwoDeep
When Oden is 100% healthy and adjusts to the NBA game he is going to be a beast. Wait and see!
I know you wanted Durant and got stuck with Oden but you'll come around...
While I've generally been in the camp
Howard is impressive because of his athletic ability, not his general basketball skills. If Oden is in fact abnormally gifted athletically, there is no reason to think he can't perform at least equal to Howard. In fact he could exceed that level of play.
Here's what the experts (perfessionals?) said:
--------------
I really like this one:
The guy is 7 feet tall, runs a 4.5 40, holds (a place) records for the long jump and triple jump. He has terrific hands and a soft touch. EXCELLENT footwork (I hate to admit that Soccer has any benefit) from soccer, and you can't teach rebounding and shot-blocking. Specifically, shotblocking. Centers don't come around often, and I can't argue with this pick. Reminds me a lot of Hakeem,... He's the real deal, but it's going to take some time.
--------------
Yes, the experts had it all figured out.
Michael Olowokandi did turn out to be pretty good, for a while. Unfortunately, after his contract year, the wheels fell off.
Does GO have more upside? Probably. But I'm going to actually wait and see. Fortunately, I've come to terms with my own "sad and dismall existance," consoling myself by picking syntactic nits and occasionally stopping to smell the "mentaliliys."
-t
No,
I hope that I have to eat my words because I'm a big Blazers fan (born and bred), but I'm a realist as well. No one doubts that Oden has the physical tools, but being a man among boys in college won't help him now. In the NBA, the best players are not as far above the average players as in college. All of those easy rebounds Oden got for being 8 feet taller than everyone else are gone. Slow dudes lumbering to the basket on a drive? Gone and replaced by Tony Parker zipping around him to feed Duncan for the dunk.
Anyhow, to get back on topic. Oden isn't ready to start so Przy starts by default. Oden will be game ready by the All-Star break and can start then. The less initial expectations on Oden, the easier it will be for him to get acclimated. He can come off the bench, play tough D on his man, board and learn how to rotate for weakside help. He's only 19 and will need to be taught a lot of basketball. Fortunately, his body is more than NBA ready.
personally..
ps so I dont get murdered in my sleep, I am giving Oden a 98% chance of being a better player than the kandi man, but he still has to go out and prove it. There is nothing guaranteed in the nba, he could get inj$r#d and never become a factor, we just dont know.
yeah!
ok...
Man hugs
Przy should start for the first month of
I will pretend that last season doesn't represent the real Przy and that he'll rebound to have a solid year. He can play tough D, board and set some high picks for Roy. He doesn't require the ball to be effective so he won't take any shots away from Roy, LMA and whomever we start at SF.
I'm hoping he can average about 16 mpg, 5 ppg, 8 rpg and 2 bpg.
Getting hit in the junk like that can unman even the best of us, but hopefully he can put that past him.
LMA at center?
Your suggestion gives a lineup of
LMA
Frye
Jones (?)
Roy
Blake/Jack
which is pretty light on defense and size.
It's hard to quantify exactly what each position requires, but I'd say that, at the least, the center needs to be able to lock down the paint on defense and control the backboards on offense. I don't think that plays to LMA's strengths unless the other team is fielding a small lineup.
Actually, he fits perfectly
I think those show his strengths to lie perfectly within your criteria.
However, I still think GO or Przy should start at center, just for more size.
LaMarcus at center
I'm confident Oden will be ready to start by the beginning of the season. He'll make mistakes and get in foul trouble, but that's how you learn. He's much too good to get discouraged by a little early bench time. Pryzbilla is the ideal back-up, and I think that's how he'll be utilized from Day 1.
The 3rd BIG
I love sayin Pryzbilla "The Vanilla Gorilla"

by 



















