A Tough Question
With 99.9% of our problem children now gone I'd like to ask a semi-problematic question that's been on my mind for a while now.
Where, how, and how much do off-court issues affect your ability to root for your favorite athletes/performers/entertainers? (In some way NBA players are all three.)
Obviously this has been a front-burner issue for Blazer fans for many years but what brought it home for me again was last week's Chris Benoit story. For those who don't know, Benoit was an enormously popular, enormously talented wrestler with the WWE...a huge fan favorite. Last week he was found dead along with his wife and child in an apparent murder-suicide. (I don't want to go into more detail than that or have it brought up here more than that. Thank you for respecting that.) Of course immediately after he was found and before the details became widely known there was an enormous outpouring of support, grief, and fantastic memories of him as a performer. But then after the horrible truth was revealed and you found out that something very, very bad had gone on, you kind of had mixed feelings. Was it really proper to even talk about, let alone remember fondly, his professional performances in the wake of such a tragedy and such an act? Was that disrespecting the victims? I still go 'round and 'round about resolving that in my own head/heart and frankly thinking about it makes me kind of ill.
Again...this can be pulled right back to the Blazers who brought up this same kind of dilemma, though obviously on a much, much smaller scale, for much of this decade.
Where is the line here? Is there a point where it's just inappropriate and crass to root for and applaud someone professionally when you know something about them personally that's just not OK? How much does it, or should it, matter? How do you reconcile those things if you still want to root for your team (and is it even fair to do so)?
I didn't dare bring this up when it was an ongoing issue lest there be a nuclear holocaust in the comment section, but now that we've been through it and appear relatively safe, perhaps we can draw some wisdom from the past that will help us in the future...or at least make interesting conversation.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
I assume that this is about Zach
The stuff that did bother me was where Zach's actions negatively impacted other people. Reckless driving and firing guns is not just Zach being a moron. It's dangerous. Even if its not Zach doing it, he is responsible for what his boys do. Someone could end up dead. That was the kind of stuff that soured me on Zach.
by JPop on Jul 5, 2007 1:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily about Zach
--Dave
by Dave on Jul 5, 2007 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my philosophy basically is the same
by JPop on Jul 5, 2007 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Weed issue
Normally i have no issue with it, but if I'm paying people to perform at a high level, i want them performing 100%
by ratbastird on Jul 5, 2007 4:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree 100%
by shenanigans on Jul 5, 2007 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends for me
I would take 12 zbo's or 12 dmiles. A guy who quits on the team. I would never want someone like that.
I would always prefer players who seem like role model people, like Roy seems, Wade seems that way, and alot of athletes are that way. But not everybody is, that's just the way it is. There are some things that would prevent me from rooting for a player no matter what.
Alot of rape issues I don't pay attention to, because I feel most the time the woman is simply trying to get money (i.e. I believe this about Kobe, and Zbo last summer)
Also, I'd rather have a team of 12 Roy like guys, who are only average or good, maybe a playoff round or 2, over a championship with 12 jerks.
by junit3123 on Jul 5, 2007 2:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it's funny...
"adopted" hometown), and cheats on his wife (may or may not have been rape).
And yet any team in the league would mortgage their future for a shot to sign him, (except maybe the Blazers).
I think we have to acknowledge there is a curve. The more talent a player has, the more we are willing to put up with. I'm just glad Portland has guys with talent and character. That's how champoionships are made.
by mjm6783 on Jul 6, 2007 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good question
Now... I would rather have a team i can love and root for and who is losing than a team that's winning full of kobe or other problematic star players.
My biggest issue would be a lack of on court team harmony or quitting on the team during game. I expect professionals.
Off court, I don't want to see criminal offenses. Strip bars? Whatever. It's legal and it irks me that people can condemn in the newspaper something that everyone is allowed to do. Maybe newspapers should report on EVERYONE who goes to strip bar so that they can impose their moral opinions WITHOUT those pesky laws getting in the way.
I just don't want my players to be knuckle heads.
by ratbastird on Jul 5, 2007 4:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Now that I have kids of my own its important
In addition, this is my city, I grew up here and I've lived here all my life. I want people here who are going to respect it, Zach never did.
by leeroyjenkins on Jul 5, 2007 7:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Can't identify with bad characters
But the fact is, psychologically, when we root for teams we identify with them and they, on some level, become a part of us. Given that, how can anybody with self pride root for a bunch of bad characters simply because they're winning?
It's always been important to me to not only win, but to win right. I've always found dishonest victories to be hollow victories and having a team of bad apples flirts with that hollowness.
In the end, it depends on how bad the thing is that they're accused of doing. If they're doing something I could see myself doing (or doing at that age) then I can roll with it. I'm no angel, but on the other hand I've never been arrested or subject to a police investigation. Of course I've also never been a young multi-millionaire member of the ethnic minority in Portland either.
In the end, the character of the players does matter. You should have a team you can talk up to non-believers and bring them into the fold. You should have a team that you can share with children. You should be lucky enough to have a team like the Blazers have now become.
by jon on Jul 5, 2007 7:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The funny thing is...
There are certain guys that you connect with over the years. Watching them play, getting to know their personality (in a limited way for sure), taking part in watching them grow as basketball players and people. This is what it means to root for someone. You want to see them succeed on the court and in life. It gives you hope that if you work hard and play the game right, you will succeed too.
The only major player from that era that I have any type of connection to is Damon. He seemed to figure things out and grow up during his time in Portland. There were alot of guys I wanted to like but you can only take so much.
I always hoped Zach would be that type of guy. I hope he figures it out in NY. I am glad I don't have to wait on him anymore and I won't really miss watching him play.
by tssbro on Jul 5, 2007 7:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
thank-god
by fatty on Jul 5, 2007 7:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Personal Responsibility
If someone begins with excuses (like saying he was just following the crowd) then we don't need that person on our team or in our community. If someone begins with ownership of their actions, then they are on the pathway to maturity.
by castle on Jul 5, 2007 8:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup
by jamon51 on Jul 5, 2007 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In these times
As far as the pot issue, I have expressed my feelings on this issue a couple of times on this site. In short, I suspect that there are quite a few NBA players that smoke, just as there are millions of Americans that imbibe, from all economic and cultural backgrounds. I expect the players that want to do this to do it in moderation, and certainly not on game days, and to do it discretely. That is just my opinion, and I don't think it contradicts my desire for them to match Oregonian's moral character, because some of the most outstanding traits that this state has always held is it's progressive, independent thought, and it's committment to individual liberties.
Now I'm going to possibly open up a can of worms, but I think it's relevant. How confusing must it be for our young people to understand what is the appropriate moral character when we are faced with a government that is exhibiting such corruption, disdain for the law, disregard of honesty as a core value, lack of integrity, and motivation for seemingly nothing but financial gain. Even the debate over these issues leads to devisiveness and name calling, exageration, and lying. All traits not included in a healthy morality. This not only effects young fans, but the newest players coming into the league are a product of these times.
Confusing perhaps, but a solidifying and uniting force for us older fans, and apparently for the "new" Blazers as well.
by crakarjack on Jul 5, 2007 10:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting topic Dave.
Definitely conflicted.
by TP43 on Jul 5, 2007 11:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That was the first thing I thought of, too.
by roseburgian on Jul 5, 2007 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Character is who you are
Character is also who you are when everyone is looking and making demands of you - in other words, under pressure - which is why character should matter to sports fans.
GMs and organizations who choose to ignore character end up creating "teams" whose players implode under pressure and whose off-the-court actions make their fans ashamed of being fans.
I've been a Blazers fan since Rick Adelman was playing guard for them, and it took the Blazers organization many, many, many years to alienate me, but they finally succeeded three years ago and I simply stopped caring about them. As far as I was concerned, the Blazers were just a collection of knuckleheads, morons, and malcontents who exemplified everything that was and is wrong with pro athletes nowadays. My family would ask if I was going to watch the Blazers play and I'd shock them by saying "No". I wanted nothing to do with the "team" and the empty seats in the Rose Garden showed that I was not alone.
Thankfully, that is all in the past now. We once again have a real team with talented, hard-working players of which we can be very proud.
Thanks, KP. Thanks, Paul. It's good to be back!
Rip City!
by dmac on Jul 5, 2007 11:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wish I wouldn't...
Except now we have as clean a slate as we are going to get. I hope the management continues to build this team with high character hires at all positions.
by lama on Jul 5, 2007 12:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Character? we're talk character?
by 24thewho on Jul 5, 2007 12:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
2 things
- if we are talking about charactor, partying with strippers and drinking at bars is perfectly legal, in fact most people have probably drank at a strip club before, so why crucify Zach for doing so. He might make 100 times the amount of money that we do but should he really have to live every aspect of his life according to a consensus groups judgement?? Who are we to say that Zach cant do this or Zach cant do that. He has never hurt anyone(except ruben who is a rapist anyway). The line Dave speaks of should seperate actions that hurt themselves(drinking, strippers, weed) and things that hurt others(rape, dog fighting, assault). The things that hurt others should never be tolerated.
- If your kid looks up to Zach and turns out to be a piece of crap in real life, its not because his idol was Zach. Its because somewhere on down the line the parents didnt efficiently apply good morals and values in their children. If your kid looks up to a "bad guy", its up to you to make them understand why he is "bad", and how to avoid being like him. Bad parents make bad children, Zach Randolph cant be responsible for a child he has never even met or influenced in person.
by myemic23 on Jul 5, 2007 1:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Zach being a strip club patron is not the issue
I understand and mostly agree with your two points. However, there are no negative actions that only hurt one person. Player X hangs around in a club at the expense of his kids and wife. Player X drinks too much the night before a game and calls in sick. These things are legal. Because Player X CAN do something legally, doesn't mean he holds no responsibility for his actions.
I thought Zach did a great job on the court this year and I don't hate the guy. I'm glad he's off the team because it frees minutes for LaMarcus.
by lama on Jul 5, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spurs
by Jumbo on Jul 5, 2007 2:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Pathetic
What does it mean to be heroic? Isn't discipline and self-sacrifice what we value? These people have abilities transcending the rest of us. It is easy for them to command attention and take advantage and surround themselves with sycophants and pretend they are little gods.
When they choose the harder road, to put others first and look after the team and see responsibility as more important than authority, then they become on the inside what they obviously are on the outside.
Bad behavior is common, rising above it is special. Sorry you think otherwise.
by castle on Jul 5, 2007 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least give them some credit
I never got upset with the "jail blazers" teams, and even found their off-court antics amusing. I failed to see how what the guys did in their spare time had any effect on how they played for us (which is the only reason we would ever even know who they were in the first place). Their indescretions were their buisiness and had little effect on how I rooted for them. They were troublemakers off the court, but winners on it. They still got to the playoffs every season and even came within one quarter of the finals, which is pretty darn good in my book.
However, even though I will defend the "Jail Blazers," I must say that I feel much better rooting for this current incarnation of the team. The "new culutre" is indeed just that and I can't wait to see where the OAR core takes us
by Jaketron on Jul 5, 2007 7:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Varieties of stupidity
But weedin' and wildin' aren't the only ways to show a lack of values.
Suffice it to say I will never root for or think well of Greg Anthony or Spencer Hawes.
by hugs on Jul 5, 2007 9:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Personal definitions, I guess
- Acceptable, if slightly distasteful. For me, that's routine attendance at strip clubs.
- Dumb and deserving of a biff on the head: Attendance at a strip club while on bereavement leave. biff! (Reporting said attendance as if it meant something. biff!) Using the press to air contract/team/personnel grievances. biff! (Or your personal relationships. Yikes.)
- Yer an idiot and deserve what the law gives ya: Smoking weed in a motor vehicle. Or drinking. Or driving like a loon.
- Simply reprehensible and unacceptable to me, personally: Dog fighting; boinkage of underage persons; other legally nonpermissable sexual misconduct; consistently being guilty of nonperformance in one's employment--not necessarily in that order.
I don't expect each and every athlete to be a prince and a scholar. I would wish, however, they could be rational and decent human beings. (When I rule the world . . .)
by roseburgian on Jul 5, 2007 9:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
SAN ANTONIO
by fatty on Jul 6, 2007 9:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















