Outside the Box
You've had a couple weeks to contemplate having the #1 pick. You've heard a ton about Greg Oden now including his remarkable workout performance numbers. (See diaries to the right for links if you haven't caught up on those.) So let's think outside the box this morning and talk about a different scenario:
If we had a magic time machine and could go back to the Shaq or Duncan drafts knowing what we know now we would have done anything possible to move up to that #1 pick, including offering any player on our roster. We don't have a time machine, of course, but in this case we don't need one. We have the pick! That means the shoe is on everybody else's foot. Given the buzz surrounding Oden you've got to believe that a lot of GM's would be willing to give almost anything to move into that top slot and get him.
Imagine with me that there's at least a possibility that any player in the NBA is yours if you will trade the pick. And by any I mean literally ANY. What player(s), if any, would you accept in trade for that pick right now?
Make your list in the comment section below. If you wouldn't trade the pick for any player anywhere let us know that too. I am curious to hear your response and rationale.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. If you want to sign up to be a GM in our mock draft make sure to scroll through yesterday's posts and leave a comment in the appropriate one. Or if you're really that lazy, click here. The slots will close after this evening because we need to give our GM's time to prepare.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I honestly would like to keep the pick
BUT
If I had to make a trade, it would be for Bron-Bron. The reason is simple: a young known quantity, who could play a position we're weak at. Look at what he has in Cleveland, a hardworking, decently talented (but not a playoff-level without him) team doing. Imagine him on a hardworking, soon to be very talented team in Portland.
Plus, while Cleveland has made some good moves, and they were burned by Boozer, they don't strike me as a franchise we'd trade with and go "oh man, now we're gonna see them a lot in June!"
Can you imagine a lineup of:
Jack/Sergio
Roy/Jones/Webster
LeBron/Outlaw
Zach/Aldridge
Aldridge/Przybilla
Not to mention the hyped our transcendental heir-Jordan vs your transcendental heir Jordan battles with LA.
The downside is we are in the West, we will be depending on Joel (and Zach?).
Considering our centerpiece great player will be almost developed, with his career practically ahead of him, our window could actually move up, and with James, KP, Roy, et al, a title/dynasty would be as close to a guarantee as could be (Oden/Durant still more potential than anything, as good as I'm sure they'll be).
pick
Duncan
Dirk
KG
Kobe
LeBron
Nash
Amare
Wade
Dwight Howard
Carmelo
I have to agree with supremepuntiff that LeBron is the guy who would make me stop and think. After watching the East finals, I think I may just be willing to pull the trigger. I'd certainly think long and hard about it.
Not LaBron
I think it would take a 3-team deal that would land us multiple young superstars, such as Wade + Derron Williams, or Chris Paul + Dwight Howard.
The only player I would consider...
In a good way.
by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 5, 2007 5:16 AM PDT reply actions
D12
by junit3123 @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 5, 2007 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Trading #1
- For Duncan - you'll get the best player in the league and have a good shot at 2 to 4 titles. The one down side is age differential. Greg Oden likely means you are in contention for a title over a 10+ year period.
- For Howard - you are almost swapping like for like. One young big guy who can dominate the boards and anchor a defense for another. The only difference is that Oden potentially has more upside offensively.
- For James - This possibly works. Portland has decent PG's plus bigs who can score (Aldridge and Randolph) and still has a slew of other young talent it can use to acquire any missing support pieces. The key is whether James and Roy can mesh. It's hard to evaluate based on just one season's play, but I would argue that the Blazers with James would work better with the ball in Roy's hands, not LaBron's. If James can play off the ball (at least half the time), then the trade would be justifiable.
- For Wade - Basically the same points as above, except that LaBron offers a bit more flexibility as to positions with his size.
bron's ball
by trail time on Jun 5, 2007 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions
No
- Kobe - No. Just No. You don't meet ol' scratch down by the crossroads.
- Dwight Howard. Oden is expected to be better is most aspects. Howard's offensive game is raw.
- LeBron. Most tempting, but doesn't "feel" like a match for Portland. Agree with the above poster than James has become a weird combination of arrogant and insecure. Probably just needs to grow into his role.
by Engineering Problem on Jun 5, 2007 6:47 AM PDT reply actions
No good enough options
Lebron will probably not stay in Cleveland. His handlers don't want that, all the people in his ear don't want that, and Lebron probably doesn't want that. The problem with Lebron is that he seems to believe the hype more than most of us do. He is INCREDIBLE, possibly the best player in the league, definately the best for his age. Talent wise, we can only hope Oden will approach his level amongst centers.
Lebron plays unselfish on the court, and has carried a VERY weak team that would maybe be the worst in the playoffs. Put Lebron on our team or half the teams in the league, and you'll always be in contention. But I just doubt him being happy in a small market, NOR do I trust his handlers to help keep him grounded and humble.
I like Oden and Durant's personalities tons more. I even like gambling on potential instead of the sure thing of Lebron. A "sure thing" like Lebron could easily turn south when he leaves in 2 years (he took a shortened contract so he could leave if he wanted to).
I know this is all academic, but he'd have to be the only player of today it'd be okay to trade for. If he was on the market, then he wouldn't be okay to trade for probably. A Young Tim Duncan is another one you could trade this pick for, but I can't think of anyone else playing now.
Dwight Howard is a WORST case scenario for Oden, so I'd rather take Oden and hope he has a post game. Howard is a beast and very young, but I don't know if he'll ever have a soft touch. I think Oden has a good shot at having an actual post game, and the rest of his game is perfect already.
With a Durant, you got possibly the best scorer in the NBA alongside one of the best team players in Brandon Roy. With them together, I think you have something better than Lebron.
This pick, no matter which dude we get, ties our team together into an almost complete package. All it would need is time to gel and a few more relatively minor pieces. Lebron is the greatest, but I don't think he fits.
The pick represents more than just a good player.
Mortimer
Bask in the moment...
In a crazy way, I want our next championship run to stew a while. I want to savor the aroma as it's cookin'. No microwave 'masterpiece' for me.
I read somewhere in here (book review?) that Blazermania was unique in that it was not a contrived thing but just seemed to take on a life of its own. It was...magical. To trade this pick for anyone out there would be stepping outside the natural flow of things IMO. Not sayin' we don't need to make some smart moves along the way, just sayin' somethin' feels right about getting Oden (see?...its already a foregone conclusion).
With the pick, we were given an opportunity. Nothing else was guaranteed - no playoffs, no championship. It's almost like a kind, old Grandfather has given us a substantial gift to get us started in life. What we do with it is left to us. Please, KP...be a wise steward.
I wouldn't trade the pick
I was born and raised in L.A. As a school boy Laker fan I watched Chamberlain battle Alcindor (later Abdul-Jabbar). I was too young to know the Laker's pretty much bought my favorite player, Wilt, (who happened to score 100 pts in a game on the very day I was born). (I also watched Walton play for UCLA at Pauley and cheered when he helped the Blazers win a championship).
It left a bad taste in my mouth when the rebuilding Laker's traded their team for Kareem (Wilt's usurper), but as a kid, I got over it when the championships started rolling in - but only after they only started after they DRAFTED Magic and later DRAFTED Worthy.
Now that I've lived all of my adult life up here, and especially after the Laker's bought Shaq, I became an unconflicted Blazer fan once and for all.
One of things that cements a team to its fans is watching "our" players develop. "Our" meaning those who started their career on "our" team. I feel Portland had a strong relationship with the Drexler / Porter / Kersey teams because the players making up the core of those teams were not hired guns. Buck Williams was the only established player brought in to start and he was respected but never embraced like the other starters.
The teams that Trader Bob built, though very talented, exciting, and for the most part successful were never embraced to the same degree as the earlier teams. Scottie Pippen, for example, will bever be thought of as a Blazer, really, just as Drexler will never truly be a Rocket even if that was the team he won a championship with.
For that reason I'd rather keep this pick than have any other established player (or players). I've rooted for teams that have won championships "the right way" and for teams that tried to buy them and though many adult Blazer fans have never enjoyed a championship let me tell you, doing it through the draft is many times more satisfying. I have confidence that adding Oden to this team will result in championships.
by jon @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 5, 2007 8:35 AM PDT reply actions
Hugs
I have friends who quit being fans once Buck left.
that is funny
by trail time on Jun 5, 2007 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions
It was the arrival of Buck
The only reasonable answers
No way they're offered of course.
If you are asking for just one player
no
And Durant just wants to win, which at the very least means he'll never want to be a Knick (zing!) or play with Kobe (double zing!)
Don't trade it for anything.
No trade
Great thread Dave.
by MattD on Jun 5, 2007 9:10 AM PDT reply actions
Yeah, don't bother trading it.
For a single player then only LeBron James,
by EnglandDan on Jun 5, 2007 9:14 AM PDT reply actions
Lebron James
only if i 'm getting
Only if....
Nowitzki can't score in the clutch and might never recover from his Finals loss and first-round exit this year...
Yao Ming would just look funny in a Trail Blazers uniform. Seriously. He's a great player but not something worth this year's #1.
Dwight Howard... is just a freak. He's young. Obviously talented. His offensive game is a lot better than people give him credit for, but he constantly sees triple and double teams. I would think long and hard about this. Dwight is at least proven to be an All-Star. He's never been hurt. He benches 375. All great qualities...
Shaq would have been considered 5 years ago. In fact, had this draft taken place around 2000, we may have snatched Shaq away from the Lakers. That being said, he's a shell of his former self.
Tim Duncan just might be a little old. Oden looks a lot like Duncan, so it's hard to trade potentially 10 good years of Oden for 2-3 great years from Duncan. I think this might actually be close, but the age is the kicker...
KG seems tired. Excuse me for drawing on XXX but you know the part where Samuel L. Jackson asks Vin Diesel if he's ever seen a lion at the zoo? They come in with all that passion in their eyes and eventually after years in a cage, they lose their fire... Well, that's pretty much the best explanation I can find about why KG can't single-handedly make the T-Wolves relevant.
Elton Brand is another big to consider but, again, age has to be a factor. Oden is 19 and he's coming into the league when all the relatively dominate bigs (Duncan, Shaq, arguably Yao, KG, and Nowitzki) are seasoned veterans and entering the years of their life where they start to decline.
I think the only trade I would absolutely 100% pull the trigger on is Tim Duncan and Tony Parker for the #1 pick, Darius Miles, and Raef LaFrentz. We'd dumb a lot of salary, pick up an extremely solid post player, and we'd get to see Eva Longoria 41 times a year....
by Champs2009 on Jun 5, 2007 11:01 AM PDT reply actions
Haha, mine doesn't look very original now.
by JMblazerfan on Jun 5, 2007 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Only for a Dynasty.
1-The Pistons must first trade us Tay and Dice for Zbo.
2-The Spurs must give us Duncan and Parker for the #1, but they also have to take back the Raef and Darius contracts plus Dickau.
Incoming: Duncan/Parker/Prince/Dice
Outgoing: #1/Raef/Miles/Zbo/Danny Boy
The championship rotation next year:
1-Parker/Jack/Sergio
2-Roy/Jones/Webster
3-Prince/Ime
4-Duncan/Dice/LMA
5-LMA/Joel/Duncan
I won't accept Wade or Lebron for the #1 pick, only a DYNASTY. Make it happen KP!! LOL.
by JMblazerfan on Jun 5, 2007 11:02 AM PDT reply actions
respect.
Not Lebron
No, seriously, I wouldn't trade the pick for anyone. LeBron would be th eonly one close, but liek people have said, we have a chance to build something very, very special here, so no, not anyone.
(But ok, you said IF we did, who would it be, and so if I had to , yes it would be LeBron)
Agreed.
But it'd be super boring. Way more fun to use the pick and see what happens. And Cleveland wouldn't trade LeBron anyway.
by little joey @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 6, 2007 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions

by 



















