Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Blazersedge Conversational Rules

Since the site continues to grow by leaps and bounds it's necessary to review and update the site rules upon occasion.  This will become a permanent link in the sidebar so you can refer to it at any time.

There aren't many, but they're important and fairly iron-clad, so please read carefully.

  1.  If you quote an outside source you must give credit to that source with a link and only quote a small portion.  Two or three sentences is generally the maximum allowed.  See the HTML Hints thread if you're not sure how to quote or post links.  
  2.  This is a non-profanity site.  I swear at home and so do you, but the standards for public conversation are higher than they are in your den and I do not apologize for that. Note that this also includes disguised swearing.  The all-symbols substitute ($#%#) is allowable because it does not lead anyone to think any word they don't want to.  (And it brings up warm, fuzzy associations with childhood comics like Hi and Lois and Hagar the Horrible.)  But even ONE letter with symbols is not allowed!
  3.  Like every other conversation site on the planet we do not allow obviously offensive comments based on race, orientation, religion, and the like.  These subjects can be discussed from time to time but should not get anywhere near the bad taste line.
  4.  Do not violate my pet peeves, which all have to do with bad/abusive/unfair conversational styles.  In other words, don't be "THAT guy".  Typical characteristics of THAT guy:
  • He posts something and then responds to every...single...comment with an overly-defensive comment of his own, not letting people have real conversation about his points.  It's fine for people to disagree.  In fact debate makes the best conversations.  If you don't want anybody to disagree with what you've written, go to Hallmark, buy a journal, and write your thoughts there.  If you write them here, give people some space to reply with good, solid points of their own.
  • He talks about the person posting instead of the post and its points/ideas.  This is completely unnecessary.  Hint:  Limit the use of the word "you" in your posts.  "You're an idiot if you think LeBron will be traded.  Cleveland values him too much..." should be just "Cleveland values LeBron too much to trade him."
  • He begins posts with phrases like, "If you had actually watched the game..." or "If you knew anything about basketball..."  These are inflammatory and again unnecessary.  It's possible that people actually did watch the game and simply saw something different than you did.  
  • He makes comparisons between basketball matters and things FAR beyond their scope, things in such poor taste that the mere mention of them obliterates any valid basketball-related conversation.  ("The refs were the Nazis and we were the Jews tonight!")

A note on Fanposts and Fanshots

Fanposts and Fanshots are your voice.  Remember the following:

  • All the rules listed above apply in the Fanposts and Fanshots.
  • A Fanpost is generally 75 words or more, eliciting deeper thought and conversation.  A Fanshot is generally 75 words or less and is a one-shot link, photo, or brief idea.  Please organize your posts accordingly.
  • Do not duplicate other Fanposts and Fanshots.
  • Do not post more than two Fanposts or Fanshots in a single day.  Leave room for others.
  • All speculative trade discussion goes in the daily Trade Drawer Fanpost.  Any speculative trade suggestion outside of the Trade Drawer will be deleted.

If you have any questions or comments feel free to e-mail me any time.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

3 recs | Comment 25 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

HAHAH
The only exception to this rule is that Damir and only Damir is allowed to swear once in an open thread each time we win the overall first pick in the lottery.  So be it.

AWESOME.

by damir on May 27, 2007 2:25 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

Awwwwwww Dangit!!!!
:::foot stomp, perhaps a good ol' fashion 2 year old temper tantrum:::
I wanted to cuss once every 20 years on this site too.  No Fair!!!!>:(
I want my front court aLaMOde!!

by shenanigans on May 27, 2007 7:04 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Howabout "panty-sniffin' trekkie"?
Can I say that?
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 27, 2007 8:28 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Profanity
You know, I completely respect your decision to make this a family-friendly, profanity-free site, both on stylistic grounds and as a way to broaden your audience.  However, as a blogger of the "cuss like a sailor" variety, I have to say I find your comment that profanity is inherently un-creative (or less creative than non-profane options) pretty condescending.  I've got a large bucket of $100 words I can deploy when I choose to, I just happen to prefer the creative act of doing obscenity mash-ups.  Diff'rent strokes, dude.

by Toast on May 27, 2007 8:29 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, Toast...
I have to agree with both of you.  As you know, I frequent both of your blogs and love them both for different reasons.  As you also know, my writing style is slightly different at Twoglasses.com than it is at Blazersedge.

What Dave is referring to here, I believe, is the person who can't put a sentence together without using the F-word (for example) two or three times.  You personally use language very creatively even in your use of profanity.  Most people do not.  Most people use one or two choice words as crutches even while they are congratulating themselves on being "edgy".  Such use is, in fact,  un-creative and, to quote the late Kurt Vonnegut, "Gives people a reason to quit listening to you."  (paraphrased)

In short (too late), I don't think you guys are too far apart in your thinking and I don't believe Dave was being condescending in a nefarious way.

 

by ken on May 27, 2007 8:52 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree with Dave
As a person in my 20s who is very out of the ordinary in that I don't swear at home OR in public (I actually don't see the difference; I think you should be pretty much the same person in private that you are in public, for better or worse), the primary reason I visit this site is for the clean, earnest discussion of all things Blazers. There are too many other forums with plenty of room for the "creative" profanity-users, and the fact that Blazers Edge is not one of them is one of the many reasons I frequent this site more than any other.

Keep it this way, Dave!

by jamon51 on May 28, 2007 11:36 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think we could have an interesting conversation
regarding "bad language" and its use here.  I see a difference between profanity and obscenity - though I think "profanity" has escaped its original meaning and many people use the word "profanity" to also encompass obscenity.  

Since I'm from the older generation (I'm even older than Grandpa Ken) I grew up not using either.  My (working class) parents occasionally used profanity (which always made me cringe) but never an obscenity.  I was at least in my 20's before I ever uttered a profanity.  I was always considered to be "a lady" and men would apologize for uttering a profanity within my hearing.  (Honest, this sounds like 19th century, but it's true.)  

At that time obscenities were always used for shock value rather than everyday words. Only "bad boys" or the most daring ever used them.  Now that they've become "everyday" they've lost that shock value, but still retain some of the "dirtiness".  Because I spent the first decades of my life knowing they were "dirty words" I still recoil somewhat from their use. Because of that innate reaction I don't read the websites where they are prevalent - I figure don't need those sites and they don't need me.  It's simply a generation thing.  (But its also gender, as growing up, "nice girls don't swear" went along with "nice girls don't kiss on the first date.")  

For Damir and the other "kids" - these words are just part of their vocabulary and come out when appropriate.  I noticed his "slip" in the lottery open thread, but his apology and begging not to be banned amused me - and touched me too.  I think it showed a respect for Dave and this blog.

Toast, I haven't seen your obscenity mash-ups and I don't know if I'd be offended or find them funny.  But I'm sure they are creative.  I guessing that Dave used the word "creative" almost as an opposite of "lazy", as we used to tell kids (I was a teacher and a mother) that using obscenities meant they were too lazy to find a better word. I'll bet he heard that as a kid!

Some Science Fiction writers are very creative when it comes to expletives.  Anne McCaffrey's "shards!" from her Pern series, for example.  I remember an Ira Levin futuristic novel in which one of our current "dirty words" was used for the biological act itself and one of our ordinary words (I've forgotten which) was the obscenity.  I'm not too creative, using "Bother!" or "Rats!" when something goes wrong, "Bad words! Bad words!" for more serious ones, and the actual profanity for substantial problems.  Obscenities are few and far between and always disguised, though obvious.

I was a Blazer fan BEFORE the lottery.

by jorga on May 27, 2007 9:53 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can almost guarantee...
you'd mostly find them funny, Jorga, Toast has a very creative way of expressing himself.

by ken on May 27, 2007 10:26 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not meaning to be condescending
Just offering an opinion.  Maybe 1 in 100 swear words add something irreplaceable to the conversation.  Maybe 1 in 10 of those irreplaceable occasions might be a novel use.  I'm willing to give up that 1 in 1000 moment to not have to read the other 999 completely wasted, predictable usages.

That's not to say that there aren't swear-word geniuses out there who can use them like Renoir used oils.  No offense to them.  I just don't want to have to put up with all the crappy imitators.

--Dave

by Dave on May 27, 2007 10:55 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Classic line from Christmas Story

In the heat of battle my father wove a tapestry of obscenities that as far as we know is still hanging in space over Lake Michigan.

by EngineerScotty on May 29, 2007 10:46 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And.... to echo Dave's sentiment

Mother: All right. Now, are you ready to tell me where you heard that word?  (The F-word, which young Ralphie uttered after losing the lugnuts while helping his dad change a tire--for the 3 of you who have never seen this classic flick)
Ralphie as Adult: [narrating] Now, I had heard that word at least ten times a day from my old man. He worked in profanity the way other artists might work in oils or clay. It was his true medium; a master. But, I chickened out and said the first name that came to mind.
Ralphie: Schwartz!

by EngineerScotty on May 29, 2007 10:49 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dave I have some questions(comments too)
First off I think it's cool you want 4th graders. The internet is a great tool for all ages when used properly. This site should remain as a Blazers info tool for a long time here (or wherever it exists).

I apologize about any flame I have started (with no intention  and having done so too many times on sr.com) as well as my inappropriate (on this blog) comments about Miles.

I do have some questions for you dave or anybody who can answer them:

  1. Is there any way to avoid the sometimes spaces i get? EX: My hoopshype link (located at the top) off the 'franchise structure' diary I wrote.

  2. Do you know of any location that gives information about the cba itself? I want to find a full text of the thing and skim it for information. If there is any idea (and I'm just grasping for straws here) where there might be of some I would appreciate it.

  3. I think SB Nation should consider a multiple diary in 1 format (like say 8 small diaries together). It would make the media tidbits more interesting grouped together for instance. Let me clarify that none of the diaries were bad (most of them have been stellar truthfully). Just think if they're small they're better grouped together. It would be harder to lose them quickly that way also.

I'm not doing this blogging thing to be popular or make money or get famous.  I'm doing this because I love great conversation about the Blazers and because the community here has become very special.  It feels like Blazermania is alive and flourishing here.

I dont need to kiss your butt but that's what make you a quality all-star blogger Dave. As is the readership here. It wouldn't be enjoyable (and I wouldn't bother truthfully) posting as much as I did if it wasn't.

by pookeyguru on May 27, 2007 12:39 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Huh?

as well as my inappropriate (on this blog) comments about Miles.

No such thing as "inappropriate comments" about Darius Miles. Get with the program.

by damir on May 27, 2007 1:13 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Damir
I would agree with you. However, there was an analogy to James Byrd there. That doesn't seem appropriate to keeping it clean on this blog. So for that was apologizing. Mostly it was Dave's comment apologizing for my action that bothered me. His rules are pretty clear. He has made them known consistently. He didn't make me wrote what I wrote. I dont think it was wrong about Miles, I just could have written so on my blog (which I have).

And damir, I'm with the program. Kings>Blazers :)

by pookeyguru on May 27, 2007 1:37 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heh. THIS sounds familiar.
I'd rather host 20 people having the best Blazer conversation around
than 20,000 with no regard for each other or the site.

[coughcough]oregonliveblazerforum[coughcough]
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 27, 2007 6:54 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've tried posting on Oregon Live
Seriously I have. When i tried to do it though the format was so confusing I gave up. I'm glad I did. I doubt my Zach for BK idea would have done half as well as it has done here.

by pookeyguru on May 28, 2007 2:58 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LOL
"Well" may be an understatement, as nobody that I've seen has been remotely interested in actually prosecuting such a deal.  However it has brought up some more great discussion about Zach and trades.  To me this is one of the marks of a good community.  A good community can take a ton of different ideas, including the near-implausible from time to time, and make great conversation out of them.  A poor community takes great ideas and turns them into junk.

I think we're one of the better ones but the O-Live forum sometimes gets too harsh of a rap too.  There are challenges to posting there but on the other hand it's also exciting like the old, wild West...which is part of its allure.  Sometimes you're just in the mood for that kind of thing.  Also there are a lot of well-meaning people there from what I can gather.

--Dave

by Dave on May 28, 2007 11:44 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wild Wild West eh?

Seth Bullock: There's a blood stain on your floor.
Al Swearengen: Yeah, I'm... I'm gonna get to that.

by damir on May 28, 2007 1:04 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great link!
Thou gleeking empty-hearted foot-licker!

Gleeking is a perfect word to add to our Blazeredge vocabulary.

In Kevin Pritchard I trust. - thanks to TP43

by jorga on May 27, 2007 9:37 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sounds like a cross between geeking
and gleefully.

Usage:  "George Lucas' announcement of episode one had many a Star Wars fan Gleeking out over the news.  The gleeking waned Jar-jar showed up, and never recovered from episode II."

Oh, Nancy! The Superpan is not magical, it will burn you.

by supremepuntiff on May 27, 2007 10:56 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

gleeking
I always thought that gleeking was when you accidentally sent a little spray of spit out of your mouth.

by chickenmelt on May 28, 2007 10:34 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Accidentally"? Not necessarily.
My friend Scott can gleek at will.
It's like there's a water pistol in the salivary glands under his tongue.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 28, 2007 6:42 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh yeah
I'm all about that.  Bard us up.

--Dave

by Dave on May 27, 2007 11:02 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

......wha?
Excuse me while my 20-year-old self throws up on that curse generator.

by damir on May 28, 2007 12:44 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

180px-blazers_original_small
Check the action, KP. The cards will come.
100_4977_small
JD 7/5
Small
Commitment
Small
Nicolas Batum interview in REVERSE (french mag) of July
Small
HAVE WE LOST OUR MINDS

Recent FanPosts

Small
My take on what the blazers need
Small
Leon Powe
Small
Why Hedo?
Batum_small
Cap Space Options
Small
Outside Shooting vs. Driving to the hoop
Small
2009 Blazers = 2000 Bulls?
Small
Blessing in Disguise
Nike_o_small
Why not Andre Miller?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Greedo Turkoglu



"E lo tolo Pritchard????"
See Ya Later Hedo! It was fun while it lasted :)
fooled us!
Hedo Rejects Deal, Ends Talks
Hedo in red and black. Bustabucket whipped out the Photoshop

Recent FanShots

Sheed to the Celts
Orlando's take on the Hedo to Toronto signing
Brandon Bass: 25 million dollar man
Thought this was hecka funny TORONTO / PORTLAND - Turkish star Hidayet...
Odem and Lee Not Right For the Blazers
Victor Claver Video Interview
They do not teach pronouns at the Toronto Sun
New Canzano column re: Hedo
Think he'd sign for veteran's minimum?
The Ron Artest Soap Opera Reviewed (by timbo)

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

151054601_tp_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports