Blazersedge Conversational Rules
Since the site continues to grow by leaps and bounds it's necessary to review and update the site rules upon occasion. This will become a permanent link in the sidebar so you can refer to it at any time.
There aren't many, but they're important and fairly iron-clad, so please read carefully.
- If you quote an outside source you must give credit to that source with a link and only quote a small portion. Two or three sentences is generally the maximum allowed. See the HTML Hints thread if you're not sure how to quote or post links.
- This is a non-profanity site. I swear at home and so do you, but the standards for public conversation are higher than they are in your den and I do not apologize for that. Note that this also includes disguised swearing. The all-symbols substitute ($#%#) is allowable because it does not lead anyone to think any word they don't want to. (And it brings up warm, fuzzy associations with childhood comics like Hi and Lois and Hagar the Horrible.) But even ONE letter with symbols is not allowed!
- Like every other conversation site on the planet we do not allow obviously offensive comments based on race, orientation, religion, and the like. These subjects can be discussed from time to time but should not get anywhere near the bad taste line.
- Do not violate my pet peeves, which all have to do with bad/abusive/unfair conversational styles. In other words, don't be "THAT guy". Typical characteristics of THAT guy:
- He posts something and then responds to every...single...comment with an overly-defensive comment of his own, not letting people have real conversation about his points. It's fine for people to disagree. In fact debate makes the best conversations. If you don't want anybody to disagree with what you've written, go to Hallmark, buy a journal, and write your thoughts there. If you write them here, give people some space to reply with good, solid points of their own.
- He talks about the person posting instead of the post and its points/ideas. This is completely unnecessary. Hint: Limit the use of the word "you" in your posts. "You're an idiot if you think LeBron will be traded. Cleveland values him too much..." should be just "Cleveland values LeBron too much to trade him."
- He begins posts with phrases like, "If you had actually watched the game..." or "If you knew anything about basketball..." These are inflammatory and again unnecessary. It's possible that people actually did watch the game and simply saw something different than you did.
- He makes comparisons between basketball matters and things FAR beyond their scope, things in such poor taste that the mere mention of them obliterates any valid basketball-related conversation. ("The refs were the Nazis and we were the Jews tonight!")
A note on Fanposts and Fanshots
Fanposts and Fanshots are your voice. Remember the following:
-
All the rules listed above apply in the Fanposts and Fanshots.
-
A Fanpost is generally 75 words or more, eliciting deeper thought and conversation. A Fanshot is generally 75 words or less and is a one-shot link, photo, or brief idea. Please organize your posts accordingly.
-
Do not duplicate other Fanposts and Fanshots.
-
Do not post more than two Fanposts or Fanshots in a single day. Leave room for others.
-
All speculative trade discussion goes in the daily Trade Drawer Fanpost. Any speculative trade suggestion outside of the Trade Drawer will be deleted.
If you have any questions or comments feel free to e-mail me any time.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
3 recs |
25 comments
Comments
HAHAH
AWESOME.
by damir on
May 27, 2007 2:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Awwwwwww Dangit!!!!
I wanted to cuss once every 20 years on this site too. No Fair!!!!>:(
by shenanigans on
May 27, 2007 7:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Howabout "panty-sniffin' trekkie"?
by QualityPie on
May 27, 2007 8:28 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Profanity
by Toast on
May 27, 2007 8:29 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually, Toast...
What Dave is referring to here, I believe, is the person who can't put a sentence together without using the F-word (for example) two or three times. You personally use language very creatively even in your use of profanity. Most people do not. Most people use one or two choice words as crutches even while they are congratulating themselves on being "edgy". Such use is, in fact, un-creative and, to quote the late Kurt Vonnegut, "Gives people a reason to quit listening to you." (paraphrased)
In short (too late), I don't think you guys are too far apart in your thinking and I don't believe Dave was being condescending in a nefarious way.
by ken on
May 27, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with Dave
Keep it this way, Dave!
by jamon51 on
May 28, 2007 11:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think we could have an interesting conversation
Since I'm from the older generation (I'm even older than Grandpa Ken) I grew up not using either. My (working class) parents occasionally used profanity (which always made me cringe) but never an obscenity. I was at least in my 20's before I ever uttered a profanity. I was always considered to be "a lady" and men would apologize for uttering a profanity within my hearing. (Honest, this sounds like 19th century, but it's true.)
At that time obscenities were always used for shock value rather than everyday words. Only "bad boys" or the most daring ever used them. Now that they've become "everyday" they've lost that shock value, but still retain some of the "dirtiness". Because I spent the first decades of my life knowing they were "dirty words" I still recoil somewhat from their use. Because of that innate reaction I don't read the websites where they are prevalent - I figure don't need those sites and they don't need me. It's simply a generation thing. (But its also gender, as growing up, "nice girls don't swear" went along with "nice girls don't kiss on the first date.")
For Damir and the other "kids" - these words are just part of their vocabulary and come out when appropriate. I noticed his "slip" in the lottery open thread, but his apology and begging not to be banned amused me - and touched me too. I think it showed a respect for Dave and this blog.
Toast, I haven't seen your obscenity mash-ups and I don't know if I'd be offended or find them funny. But I'm sure they are creative. I guessing that Dave used the word "creative" almost as an opposite of "lazy", as we used to tell kids (I was a teacher and a mother) that using obscenities meant they were too lazy to find a better word. I'll bet he heard that as a kid!
Some Science Fiction writers are very creative when it comes to expletives. Anne McCaffrey's "shards!" from her Pern series, for example. I remember an Ira Levin futuristic novel in which one of our current "dirty words" was used for the biological act itself and one of our ordinary words (I've forgotten which) was the obscenity. I'm not too creative, using "Bother!" or "Rats!" when something goes wrong, "Bad words! Bad words!" for more serious ones, and the actual profanity for substantial problems. Obscenities are few and far between and always disguised, though obvious.
by jorga on
May 27, 2007 9:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can almost guarantee...
by ken on
May 27, 2007 10:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not meaning to be condescending
That's not to say that there aren't swear-word geniuses out there who can use them like Renoir used oils. No offense to them. I just don't want to have to put up with all the crappy imitators.
--Dave
by Dave on
May 27, 2007 10:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Classic line from Christmas Story
In the heat of battle my father wove a tapestry of obscenities that as far as we know is still hanging in space over Lake Michigan.
by EngineerScotty on
May 29, 2007 10:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And.... to echo Dave's sentiment
Mother: All right. Now, are you ready to tell me where you heard that word? (The F-word, which young Ralphie uttered after losing the lugnuts while helping his dad change a tire--for the 3 of you who have never seen this classic flick)
Ralphie as Adult: [narrating] Now, I had heard that word at least ten times a day from my old man. He worked in profanity the way other artists might work in oils or clay. It was his true medium; a master. But, I chickened out and said the first name that came to mind.
Ralphie: Schwartz!
by EngineerScotty on
May 29, 2007 10:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dave I have some questions(comments too)
I apologize about any flame I have started (with no intention and having done so too many times on sr.com) as well as my inappropriate (on this blog) comments about Miles.
I do have some questions for you dave or anybody who can answer them:
- Is there any way to avoid the sometimes spaces i get? EX: My hoopshype link (located at the top) off the 'franchise structure' diary I wrote.
- Do you know of any location that gives information about the cba itself? I want to find a full text of the thing and skim it for information. If there is any idea (and I'm just grasping for straws here) where there might be of some I would appreciate it.
- I think SB Nation should consider a multiple diary in 1 format (like say 8 small diaries together). It would make the media tidbits more interesting grouped together for instance. Let me clarify that none of the diaries were bad (most of them have been stellar truthfully). Just think if they're small they're better grouped together. It would be harder to lose them quickly that way also.
I dont need to kiss your butt but that's what make you a quality all-star blogger Dave. As is the readership here. It wouldn't be enjoyable (and I wouldn't bother truthfully) posting as much as I did if it wasn't.
by pookeyguru on
May 27, 2007 12:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Huh?
as well as my inappropriate (on this blog) comments about Miles.
No such thing as "inappropriate comments" about Darius Miles. Get with the program.
by damir on
May 27, 2007 1:13 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Damir
And damir, I'm with the program. Kings>Blazers :)
by pookeyguru on
May 27, 2007 1:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heh. THIS sounds familiar.
than 20,000 with no regard for each other or the site.
[coughcough]oregonliveblazerforum[coughcough]
by QualityPie on
May 27, 2007 6:54 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I've tried posting on Oregon Live
by pookeyguru on
May 28, 2007 2:58 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
I think we're one of the better ones but the O-Live forum sometimes gets too harsh of a rap too. There are challenges to posting there but on the other hand it's also exciting like the old, wild West...which is part of its allure. Sometimes you're just in the mood for that kind of thing. Also there are a lot of well-meaning people there from what I can gather.
--Dave
by Dave on
May 28, 2007 11:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wild Wild West eh?

Seth Bullock: There's a blood stain on your floor.
Al Swearengen: Yeah, I'm... I'm gonna get to that.
by damir on
May 28, 2007 1:04 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How about Shakespearean cussin'
by EnglandDan on
May 27, 2007 8:24 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Great link!
Gleeking is a perfect word to add to our Blazeredge vocabulary.
by jorga on
May 27, 2007 9:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sounds like a cross between geeking
Usage: "George Lucas' announcement of episode one had many a Star Wars fan Gleeking out over the news. The gleeking waned Jar-jar showed up, and never recovered from episode II."
by supremepuntiff on
May 27, 2007 10:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
gleeking
by chickenmelt on
May 28, 2007 10:34 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Accidentally"? Not necessarily.
It's like there's a water pistol in the salivary glands under his tongue.
by QualityPie on
May 28, 2007 6:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
......wha?
by damir on
May 28, 2007 12:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs


















