What Makes Me Mad
I got an interesting e-mail from Jordan yesterday. Among other things he posed a question, thus:
I'm relating this publicly because I think in part it's a mischaracterization. Anyone who has actually seen me watch a game knows I'm not all that calm and believe me, the higher the stakes go the more trouble I have keeping my temper or keeping my seat (whichever is called for). I get pretty pumped for games now and when we start approaching meaningful playoff territory...whoo boy. Better clear a 15' radius around me and beg, borrow, or steal some earplugs.
However there's a difference between being excited and emotional during the game and being angry about it afterwards. I'm almost always the former. I only dabble in the latter when playoff losses to the L*kers (or comparable things) are on the menu. I guess I've seen too many real heartbreaks like the 1990 and '92 Finals, the '91 Western Conference Game 6, and of course the 2000 collapse to get really worked up about a game against the Bucks in December of a season where we're not expected to compete. The game matters a lot when it's being contested but its lasting impact is minimal. This was always going to be a gradual process and I'd drive myself nuts living and dying all night with every incremental step forward or slight loop backwards.
It also helps understanding where we are and who we are right now. If I sit down to watch a Chihuahua and an elephant play musical chairs I'm not going to be terribly surprised when the Chihuahua ends up as a cushion stain. I'm going to get really excited when the doggy pulls out the victory but otherwise I'm going to give a reasonable response: "Wait until Senor Sniffles gets bigger." I'm certainly not going to get angry at the dog, berate it for not trying, or yell at its trainer. If anything I would say, "When the puppy gets a little older and wiser it will take Packy out to the agility course and make him play a different game." But until that happens, why get all in a tizzy? What did you expect to see? As soon as "All Around the Mulberry Bush" hit the turntable you probably should have known how this would turn out.
That said, there are things that would still make me angry. These include:
- Watching rampant, ignorant stupidity. This includes on-court and off-court behavior. Watching guys get in trouble with the law in ways that reasonably aware people manage to avoid was hard. Watching guys make the same stupid plays on the court because it took the least effort and thought--or just pumped up their stats--was harder. Many times it seemed like the players didn't care about winning, the uniform, or the fans. That was hard to swallow and made me plenty cranky. Fortunately, for all our current struggles, it seems like those days are long gone.
- Being treated like a fool by the organization's PR arm, mostly through denial that any of the above was going on. This was actually a major impetus for me to start blogging at first--to affirm that fans aren't stupid sheep--though obviously my raison d'etre has gone well beyond that now. Things have gotten a lot better on this front too. We don't see pat denials, glib rationalizations, or commercials and slogans trying to disguise a broken relationship. Instead it sounds like the organization is interested in healing the relationship (and in most cases that intention was enough to actually heal it). I still get a little itchy at the mention of the 25-Point Pledge though.
- Seeing fan stupidity, defined less by being wrong than by cannibalizing each other because they happen to disagree on an arguable point. This was another reason I got into blogging, because I believed that much of what we were seeing out there didn't really represent how Blazer fans felt. I think all of you have confirmed that notion in spades and I think it has made a difference. This probably made me madder than any of the others because it was driving a lot of people away...people who wanted to love and support the team but couldn't find anyone to accept their voice of praise or honest criticism. It also hit home because this was our family, you know? Players are increasingly young and increasingly rich and you can understand how some of them might become disconnected with the community and its reality. The organization has an agenda and you can see where they would steer things certain ways even if you didn't agree with that direction. You can also see how their agenda could override their connection with the community, as sometimes happens in any business. But fans being out of touch with each other, acting stupid with each other, driving each other out by not caring about anything but the sound of their own voice? That's not representing at all and as a long-time fan who grew up in this community, with this team, and among its people that really made me angry (and still does). If fans don't respect each other and evidence a reasonable amount of intelligence how are the organization and players supposed to respect them or even give a damn?
The answer is an overwhelming YES...plenty of times. Among the more obvious:
--I was in favor of the Jermaine O'Neal deal. I believe one of my exact quotes at the time was, "It doesn't seem like Jermaine is going to amount to much of anything but if he does it'll probably be for another team." Fortunately this was well before I was blogging and the only witnesses were a small group of e-mail friends.
--I whistled past the graveyard on the Shawn Kemp thing, the last time I have done so. Mind you, everyone I was talking with (including me) knew that was a problematic deal...the salary, his history, his production. It was a stinker and we all called it the day it went down. But after that I started rationalizing all of the ways it could maybe work. Pfffffft! Should have stuck with my initial impression.
--I was too hard on Rasheed in his last days. I was angry with him not because of his play or talent, but because he quit on us. My reaction to that made me too critical of him and led me to jump far too easily into Zach Randolph's arms, which was clearly a mistake also. I have always maintained since that Rasheed was one of the best all-around players to put on a Portland uniform and I still believe that. But I'm not particularly proud that his half-baked commitment led me to some half-baked analysis at the time.
Those are just the huge examples. There have been plenty of smaller ones. Who knows, perhaps I am wrong in my analysis of some of the current guys. I've gotten better from making mistakes though. I hope many of our current youngsters are able to do the same.
Thanks for the e-mail Jordan, and thanks to all who take time to write.
Tomorrow...the infamous "What's Youth and What's Not" post.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. TimG had a great idea in his comment to this post. What were your Blazer mistakes? (Things that you were darn sure would go one way and went another.) Do share.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not a big list of mistakes.
On the other hand, I knew exchanging Brian Grant for Shawn "call me daddy for I just might be" Kemp was a mistake of the first order. This was mainly due to not retaining Grant. He was exactly the sort of player Portland wanted and a major piece of the soul of the team. Replacing him with Kemp was piling idiocity on top of stupidity.
I never got down on Wallace. There were times he was irritating, but I pretty much accepted Rasheed for what he was - one of the most talented players in the league who was not a leader. A man with a good heart who wore his emotions and thoughts on the outside. To me, a guy like Wallace needs an organization and a coach who understands exactly what he is and acts to his strengths. Portland never did. Detroit has and look at the result.
Some of my Blazer mistakes:
Thinking adding Detlef Schrempf was a good move.
Thinking trading Steve Smith was a good move. With Bonzi I figured we wouldn't miss him. Should have kept Smith until his contract expired and never have added DA.
Believing Bonzi Wells and Rasheed Wallace were a nice pair to build around. Hell, believing in Bonzi Wells at all.
Resigning Ratliff. (Although he did help bring us Roy.)
Giving up on Martell Webster too early. Up until the start of the season, I would have easily included Martell in a deal that would have brought us someone off my list of favorite players. (I would not have included him in the Randolph deal, unless it netted us David Lee in place of Frye.)
Possible mistake - believing Jarrett Jack and Steve Blake both were decent bets to become a quality starting PG. (I'm going to back completely away from this yet. But I'm now thinking "possible bet" rather than "decent bet".)
Possible mistake - thinking Travis Outlaw will never attain reliable 6th man status. (Although I'd still take Josh Howard over Trout in a heart beat.)
Still, I tend to think I've been right more often than not.
I would not have made wholesale changes after 2000.
I would not have extended Randolph (with a max deal) without at least waiting another year.
I was against resigning Miles. I would have only done so on my terms - the amount he asked for, but only 4 years with the last year being a team option.
I would not have drafted Telfair. At least not at 11. 23rd pick, maybe.
I knew by year two that Telfair was in no way our PG of the future. As a corallary, I wanted to keep our pick in 06 and select Deron Williams. Since I thought Telfair worthless, getting a good point guard was still a priority. On the other hand, I wasn't terribly upset, as I thought Portland turned the pick into two productive players in Webster and Jack.
Overall, I figure I don't qualify to fill Kevin Pritchard's shoes, but I probably could have done no worse than Whitsett, Patterson and Nash. But then that might apply to half the folks here at BE.
expectations
My expectations are that I can be proud they are My Team, win or lose. That they will play hard, learn both the game and playing together, and be good in the community. I am not disappointed.
Blazers Edge puts it in perspective. Not too high on the wins, or too low on the losses.
by Zap on Dec 5, 2007 9:32 AM PST reply actions
Channing Frye
I love basketball.
Spidery webs of imaginary possibility spin between players - some quickly wadded into cotton balls, others strengthen into thick bands of reality - sometimes a pass, sometimes a shot.
I marvel when this imaginary spider's web of connectivity seems to reach all the way into a player's mind. Without the subtle tugging of a victim on a far tendril of the web, how else did Sabonis know to slip that pass off to the corner? What else, if not a silken cord of improbability, could have pulled Sean Elliot's 3-pointer from his hands to the hoop?
Good players emit webs in all directions - poor players in few and some: not at all.
I have no choices left in the team I love. It was set long ago, and unlike a job, a religion, a love, there's no tool for changing. I learned to love Portland before I really learned how to love. I spent years falling out of love, yet I never hit the ground. It's clear there is no ground - you just keep falling, past hate, past regret... into a thickening cloud of indifference. There's no other team down there - I looked.
Like old lovers, we annoy each other. We have habits seemingly designed to carve painful runes on each other's liver. We berate each other, we dismiss each other, we shake our heads in annoyance, but such extravagances in disregard are only afforded by our inability to let each other go.
I love the game. I wish the team would play it the way I see it in my mind's eye. I wish the spider webs of possibility would tangle our opponents, splay them helpless, allow us to feast on their fear. I cringe at the cobwebs, wadded up sticky balls of webbing, rolling about without purpose, capturing friend and foe alike.
I anxiously anticipate a well-executed spider web, a shimmering, glistening statement of dewy organic order, improbably hanging with geometric precision. I know they're hard to make, so I take comfort in the small pleasures, the spinning, the testing, the hanging. As long as we keep making webs, and as long as I float above indifference, it gives me satisfaction.
If you find yourself whipsawed by emotion I'll inflict two pieces of advice: find fault in your successes, and find the successes buried in your failings.
P.S. I thought Rod Strickland was a good pickup.
-t
Dave
We should put a list of predictions, similar to your game day form, but for the whole season. And then, not at the end of the season but at the same time the next year, review those predictions, see who was on and who was way off, and then do another round for the next year. Make people put down their thoughts so they can't just fatty it ("see I told you so") and rather they have to go back and see what they really thought.
Some of my major mistakes: thinking Sergie Monia was going to fix the SG problems the Blazers had a few years back; discounting Joel Przybilla when he first came; thinking Telfair was going to be another AI...just a short list... :)
Some example questions for the season-long form...note that some of them are fairly open-ended:
WILL MARTELL WEBSTER BE THE LONG-TERM ANSWER AT SF?
WILL BRANDON ROY PLAY SG ALL YEAR, OR SWITCH TO PG?
HOW GOOD WILL SERGIO RODRIGUEZ BE?
HOW MUCH OF AN IMPACT WILL RAEF LAFRENTZ HAVE ON THE 2007/2008 SEASON?
etc etc
Well, here's one
mistakes?? huh?
i was right about ratliff but apparently the only people that thought it was a good idea to extend his contract was nash and the rest of the bozos running the team at that time......
i was wrong about patterson, i liked him thought he was a decent guy, hell i met him when i worked there for a bit and just thought he was the cat's pajamas, but whoa was i wrong about that!
i never liked getting rid of adelman and hiring pj, never liked and never will like carlesimo.....
and i have to say, i was happy when sheed went to the pistons and won a title (and i predicted to my friends that they would beat the lakers, which no one else thought could happen, based on match ups) i never got down on him because he played hard, always said he did not want to be the main guy, but the front office brass never listened to him and tried to mold him into that, and then put a bunch of bad apples around him, i mean talk about combustion......
and i held out for DA, i kept wanting him to be that player he should have been, but he always just sucked a$$, i hate him and i hate that he won a ring with miami......
the book is still out on outlaw, my friends are still pretty down on him cuz the guy doesnt pass, but he is still so young, not very bright, but learning very slowly........
needless to say we all have had our mistakes, and im more like dave, i have high hopes for the team but i support them through thick and thin and dont get mad when they are sucking, it happens its sports, and with such a young squad, it takes a lot of time to develop, especially with one another, they could go on a nice run towards the end of the season as everyone needs to learn to play with each other, but you always need to get comfortable with your teamates, SA, dallas, detroit, they are all successful because of a high level of continuity, that stuff helps......
by paintthetownbrown on Dec 5, 2007 12:56 PM PST reply actions
I am never wrong
I also need to recalculate my expectaions for this season. I thought it was going to be a fun, young, running team that would try to use their youth and quickness to their advantage. Now I realize that I need to look at them as an unfinished product. I would not buy an unfinished product, but I would check in to see how it is coming along.
My new calculation is for the Blazers to win 9.6 games this season. Anything above that is gravy, and I would love to have to recalculate. Expect the worse and hope for the best. To me, that is this season in a nutshell.
Go Blazers!
I was
I thought...
Mmm, my Blazer mistakes?
Getting excited about the hiring of Mike Dunleavy (not that his "failure" had anything to do with his coaching) and Maurice Cheeks (never put your faith in a first year coach, especially a really nice guy.)
Giving Telfair too much benefit of the doubt. (Which means I may have overcorrected with Martell and Travis.)
Getting rid of early memorabilia. Not going to more games.
Sheed isn't a horrible guy, but...
My Blazer blunders
Another one I think I had right occurred way back in Blazer yesteryear. I was a young Warriors fan, living in the Bay Area. But even from that distant vantage point, I felt that trading Calvin Natt for Kike Vandeweigh (sp?) was dumb. Natt was the type of tough, playoff-ready player that I've always loved (Luke, Kersey, Williams, and Porter were four other hardnosed Blazers that I admired from afar). How could the Blazers have traded the heart & soul of their team for a soft, disappear-in-the-playoffs type like Kiki? I didn't understand that one.
BTW, I stand ready to be corrected if my recollection of this trade is inaccurate; maybe it wasn't a straight deal like I've described...

by 



















