Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Recap: Blazers 106, Grizzlies 105

Ahhhhh...winning makes everything fun again, doesn't it?  You need those every once in a while.

Boxscore

Team Observations

It's funny how giddy I feel after watching the game because I've actually seen the Blazers play much better than they did tonight.  We didn't defend or rebound particularly toughly through most of the game.  We relied far too heavily on the three-point shot.  We had major lapses in concentration down to the very last moments of the game.  If you asked me if we could win a game while playing this way again I'd say, "Sure, but I wouldn't want to try it too often." But we did enough to overcome our deficiencies and stepped up when it counted, which is all that matters for tonight.

Speaking of, let's talk about some of the things we did well.  First off, in a relatively fast-paced game we committed only 10 turnovers.  Memphis did score 21 off of those but that was negated by the 27 points we scored off of their 15 turnovers.  Converting that many T.O.'s into points was a huge boost.  We did a reasonable job of staying in between them and the rim.  We had lapses but most often they were shooting over people.  We didn't get anywhere near their perimeter shooters but I'd rather have that than a parade into the lane all night long.  The shot distribution was probably what we need to play winning basketball.  We shared the ball fine, dishing out 26 assists, but when push came to shove Lamarcus and Brandon were the guys shooting the ball.  They attempted a combined 44 of our 84 shots.  Outlaw added 13 attempts because he was the hot hand late.  Przybilla had 3, Blake 4, LaFrentz 1, Sergio 0.  We need to find the right combination of the ball moving but still having our best players take most of the shots.  We found that combination tonight.  Granted it was a against a Memphis defense that wouldn't scare a reasonable-sized Beanie Baby, but that's still something.  We also compensated for players who were hot and cold.  Guys who missed (outside of our main two) didn't get more shots.  Guys who were hot got fed.  This is also a sign of maturity.  Not that I expect it to stick, but it's good to see it's possible.

Most of all I loved how the team turned it up in the third and fourth quarters.  Brandon Roy led the charge, waking up from his slump to punish the Grizzlies.  One he sparked it set the team on fire.  We decided not to lose this game and we did enough to give ourselves a chance.  Yes, some of those shots were lucky but we put ourselves in a situation where getting lucky was possible.  That's not bad for this team...certainly better than some of our recent efforts.

Individual Observations

--What the dee-diddly-dang-dang happened to Travis?  Somewhere around the end of the third quarter he ducked out, changed out of his mild-mannered Floppy Fish suit, and became SUPER TROUT.   And boy did we need him.  His greatest strength is that he can get a shot up anywhere, anytime over anybody when single-covered.  We put ourselves in a position where that mattered tonight and Travis really came through.  He hit a couple of last-second bail-out shots that defied belief.  It's a good thing he hit that game-winner too because it looked for all the world like he was primarily responsible for letting Rudy Gay slip through for the offensive rebound off of that Navarro miss on the penultimate play of the game.  It would have been easier to win it by boxing out Gay, but it was more ESPN-worthy to win it like he did.

--After another shaky start Brandon Roy CAME ALIVE!  26 points, 9 rebounds, 7 assists looks pretty darn good to me.  He's the one who got us back in this game, make no mistake.  People were getting pretty uptight about his slump because we had not seen him do that before.  He's going to have stretches like that, especially against good defensive teams.  For all we know he may still be in the thick of his current slump.  But it doesn't matter because you know he's going to come out of it and be the solid player he's always been.  Don't fret about this guy.  He is the man.

--Lamarcus had another fantastic outing in most ways.  He shot efficiently and well and scored 23.  He played some great defense on Pau Gasol right through the closing minutes of the game.  He only got 5 boards, 2 defensive, which is a concern.  He didn't get any free throw attempts.  Part of that was the style of offense he was playing and part of it was that the two teams combined for only 26 free throws total.  Still, he needs moves in his arsenal that will draw him fouls.  That will be the difference between him scoring 19 and 25 a game.

--Steve Blake had 6 assists and 3 steals and played appropriately.  I got frustrated with him a couple times as he refused to take shots when he should have, leading to bad offensive possessions for us.  But I wouldn't be surprised if part of the game plan was to run through the two main guys so maybe he had that in mind.

--Joel Przybilla also contributed nicely, helping defensively against Gasol as well.  He really frustrated me by picking up a couple of stupid fouls though.  We need him available as an option and he takes himself right out of the game when he has mental lapses like that.

--For the first three quarters of this game Martell Webster was an El stinko burrito with a side of suckamole.  Not only was he not hitting shots, he virtually disappeared off of the court in a manner we haven't seen since last season.  His defense, rebounding, and energy all went to pot like his warranty had just expired.  However when Brandon stepped up in the fourth Martell did also. Hopefully he'll be back to regular form next game.

--James Jones was a huge hero in this game.  He shot 6-7 overall including 4-4 from the three-point line.  His 16 points spread out the Grizzlies' defense and freed up room for others to drive and shoot.  His release was quick too!  I assume he won't shoot like this every night but even once in a while is fine.

--I still love it every time Jarrett Jack drives.  Keep it up!  He missed his jumpers tonight but that will happen with him.

One-Sentence Game Summary:

Buzzer beaters make the whole world happy!

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Super Trout!
Great recap Dave.  

Wins are fun.

by jksnake99 on Dec 3, 2007 10:15 PM PST reply actions  

Lucky
Well, I like the fact we won, but we were really lucky.  If Outlaw didn't hit those shots he would have been the goat of the game.

Roy was lucky that Outlaw was able to tip the ball to Blake and get the return pass and "3" for Outlaw.

Still think we played too many point guards, but maybe Jones will become the 2-guard since Roy will play PG in the 4th quarter whether he does it well or not.  Jack and Blake seem worthless when Roy is controlling the ball.

Glad to see the centers playing center, but Joel had stupid fouls and Raef didn't control the boards (although that may be because his teammates don't block out).

Still, a win is a win even if one doesn't "deserve" it.

by vcubed on Dec 3, 2007 10:17 PM PST reply actions  

Re/ boxing out on the boards
That big offensive rebound off a free throw that the Grizzlies had in the fourth quarter came off of Raef.  He boxed out, but so weakly that the Grizzlie player was able to nudge him forward and grab the rebound right over the top.  I thought Raef was supposed to provide a little toughness--if nothing else.  That was only one play, but it was a big one.  

Speaking of not boxing out: sandwiched between Outlaw's two great final shots was another Travis 4th quarter boner.  Namely, it was Travis who failed to box out Gay--his man--on that putback play.  If Travis had just put a body on his man--like they teach you in grade school--that last-instant shot would have been unnecessary.  

I'll bet Nate would like to outfit a couple of his young players with shock collars during practices.  Then Nate could give 'em a little buzz every time they forgot to block out.  THAT'D solve the problem!  :-)

by hurryup09 on Dec 4, 2007 3:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm really glad we won
   Happy to get the monkey of the first road win off our backs, and snap the streak.

   However, I'm a little disturbed. Seems like the only way The Blazers win on the road is if I go against them winning in the jersey contest. Started this month out with a new philosophy, and it was the first road game where I wasn't a homer, and did NOT pick The Blazers to win.

   So what do I do? As a Blazer fan I feel it is more important that the team do well. Guess I will just have to keep going against them, until they lose. I'd feel bad if I went back to picking them to win, and then they started losing again.

   So GO BLAZERS! I'll do my part and pick you to lose!

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Dec 3, 2007 10:45 PM PST reply actions  

Me too
I also picked them to lose. It's a win-win situation--if they lose, I get contest points. If they win, I'm happy!
"Now, we understand, you're a bug. And bugs will be bugs. But you're our bug now. Don't screw up, and you won't get squashed." - webted

by jamon51 on Dec 4, 2007 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Luck
It is interesting to me that the Blazers win and we call it luck.  I like what you said Dave about making your own luck better than calling it a lucky win for the Blazers.  They had some bad luck throughout the game if you count up how many shots bounced around and out.  Finally the shots went in down the stretch and they actually had some calls go in their favor.
Was it just me or did Jones hold the ball for about 8 seconds before finding Outlaw on the last play?  Maybe it was just time standing still...or maybe Jones has some veteran credibility built up...

by tssbro on Dec 3, 2007 11:00 PM PST reply actions  

I think what people mean by "luck" is
most of the time we don't get that steal to end the third quarter and Travis doesn't hit the buzzer beater then.  And most of the time he doesn't hit that bail out three from the coffin corner late in the fourth.  And most of the time he doesn't hit the final runner either.  If we have to rely on those things to win we're only going to win one game in twenty.  And they're right.

However that doesn't take away the fact that we did put ourselves in position to take advantage of those plays when they happened.  That is something that can carry over to other games and if we do it enough we won't need miracle shots to win (or at least not as many).

--Dave

by Dave on Dec 3, 2007 11:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Travis has show time and time again
when under pressure situations his jumper stays true.  It's the rest of the time (most of the time) when he has to think instead of just reacting that causes most of his problems.

Who other than Roy, LMA and Trout do we want taking a last second shot?

by jayjaylbh on Dec 4, 2007 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks Dave
That first paragraph of yours still has me smiling.  I mean, what, isn't that how it's supposed to happen every night?

It seems with Travis, the theory is if we keep relying on him in the 4th quarter, the law of averages says that he will come through at least every once in a while.

Don't get me wrong, I am still happy they won, but if they had lost, the 6 times I muttered Travis' name would be what I remember and not the 6 times I said, "Yes, Travis."  

In reality, I think I would be calling for his head because of that offensive rebound he gave up with 2 seconds left.  Why guess where the ball is going to come off when you can slam your a** into your man and keep him 6 feet from the hoop while Jones or Aldridge get the board.  Enjoy the win, but let's take the easier path next time.

by tssbro on Dec 4, 2007 6:48 PM PST up reply actions  

It was a solid six seconds...
I backed up the DVR and counted.  I was surprised the t.v. announcers never made mention of that.  If that had happened to the Blazers, I suspect they'd have been all over it!  

But good breaks or no, that was a nice win.   It's tough to win on the road when the opponent is shooting well, and for awhile there it seemed like every Grizzlie 3-point attempt went in.  The bottom line is that the Blazers played well enough to win.  That's about all any NBA team can do on the road--especially on a back-to-back: play tough and hope for a couple of breaks down the stretch.

by hurryup09 on Dec 4, 2007 3:48 AM PST up reply actions  

6 seconds...
wow...that would have been a heart-breaker, a 5 second call? I think it was a good non-call, but that's just my homer instinct kicking in.
"Now, we understand, you're a bug. And bugs will be bugs. But you're our bug now. Don't screw up, and you won't get squashed." - webted

by jamon51 on Dec 4, 2007 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

5 seconds actually
watch how many times the ref swung his arm. That's the way they count the seconds and show the players how many seconds have passed. It doesn't matter at all how many "real seconds" in the real clock it took because it's completely useless for refs in that kind of situation.

Jones passed the ball just before the 5th time ref swung his arm. It's close but Jones made it without a doubt.

They also do that to count the seconds players stay inside the paint area as well.

by iverigma2 on Dec 4, 2007 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah--I didn't know that
I'd assumed the ref who handed the ball to the inbounder just kept a silent count in his head.  In this case, I noticed the ref swing his arm down to commence the count, but didn't realize he continued to do so.  

That actually seems like a good system.  Perfectly accurate, no, but it's fair in that all the players know the status of the countdown.  As a (relative) vet, Jones probably knew just where he stood--close to a violation, but not quite.

by hurryup09 on Dec 4, 2007 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

They never, ever
make this call anymore.  You have to have it, like, ten seconds before they will blow the whistle.  I think maybe the league decided to de-emphasize it, as in many crucial situations it's more exciting to see a play happen than a turnover and "game over".

--Dave

by Dave on Dec 4, 2007 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for counting that
whether he was swinging his arm or not the seconds were passing by...I knew it had to be more than 5 seconds.  I think they ran about 3 or four different picks to get to Travis.

Anyway, it is nice to catch a break every once in a while.

If you ever check the DVR again, see if you can count how many times Navarro shuffled his feet without dribbling to set up his threes.  I am pretty sure it was at least three times.  

(I'm really not bitter about officiating, I know it comes and goes and they miss some and give you some.  It was just hard not to notice once I saw the first one.)

by tssbro on Dec 4, 2007 6:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice color
It is nights like this that having no TV really is bad. I read that Orlando is going through the exact same thing with Comcast except the major cable company in the city has not signed up either.

The Blazers are entering a new phase it feels like. Giving Roy the ball and letting him create. Getting Jones back and making outside shots. It opens up the middle and allows us to operate with out two studs. Your summary is the exclamation point on my assertion that the offense merely needed to be dangerous from 3 to open it up. Can Outlaw and Webster and Jones do that? They had an up close lesson tonight from Miller on how to be effective. Is it Miller that makes Pau dangerous?

For all the criticism of Coach Nate here lately perhaps there is some corresponding praise when we win.

by lee3022 on Dec 3, 2007 11:07 PM PST reply actions  

James Jones
No question, Jones was huge tonight.  Just a couple days ago I said not to expect much help from such a one-dimensional player.  But I underestimated how much a hot 3-point shooter can open up the offense.  All of a sudden Roy and Aldridge had room to operate, and both players found their rhythm.

True, Jones won't be hot every night.  But between Jones, Martell, and Outlaw, now there's three small forwards who might have the hot hand on a given night.  That's a definite plus.  

by hurryup09 on Dec 4, 2007 3:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I am also remembering
the clear delight in KP with getting JJ from Phoenix - certainly more than Channing from NY. He saw something in JJ to pull all that off.

by lee3022 on Dec 5, 2007 12:31 AM PST up reply actions  

This is some o' Dat!
JJ33 is lookin' quite athletic here!

mikebarrettsblog.blogspot.com/

What Happened?

honkaplayboys.com

by BlueBooYay on Dec 6, 2007 5:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Daily Dime Props
Monday's Best
Travis Outlaw, Blazers forward: Hits the winning 6-foot runner at the buzzer, lifting the Blazers to a 106-105 win in Memphis. Finished with 21 overall, including a 30-footer at the end of the third quarter.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-071204

by damir on Dec 3, 2007 11:42 PM PST reply actions  

Great win, DirecTV sucks
    Still can't get any Blazer games here in
Medford and KXL is in and out. Comcast and DirecTV
exec's should have their favorite teams games
taken away for while to see if they like the
feeling.  Thank goodness for National TV on Thursday.
It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Dec 4, 2007 1:29 AM PST reply actions  

whew!
We needed that. How about a nice little 4-5 game winning streak?

That was a long 2.9 seconds.

Why all the 'ya they won but they were lucky' thoughts? So what? A little luck never hurt anybody.

And where's fatty?

by rburg on Dec 4, 2007 8:13 AM PST reply actions  

Fatty banished himself
He banished himself because he vowed, on the day that Oden went in for exploratory arthroscopic surgery (before anyone knew that Oden would need microfracture), that he would banish himself for one year if Oden was seriously hurt. I guess he really beleived that Oden's injury was minor, and he wanted to back up his belief with a solemn vow. Then, to everyone's surprise, he actually took his vow seriously and banished himself.

It was really kind of a crazy, inexplicable move on Fatty's part. As I said at the time, his self-banishing accomplished nothing except hurt a bunch of people who enjoyed having him here.

But who knows? Maybe Fatty also ritually flayed himself with willow branches.

Nature bats last.

by fisheyes on Dec 4, 2007 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

damn.....
I didn't know that.... a man of his word... misguided, but nonetheless a man of his word.

Thanks

by rburg on Dec 4, 2007 8:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes, a man of his word...
mind you, a funky, arcane, borderline profane and usually misspelled word - buried in a 900 character jumble... but a man of his word, nonetheless.  ;^)

Oh yeah, Dave doesn't like swearing.  He's got this little pantscrapper now, and he's looking to avoid trouble with the missus...

by webted on Dec 4, 2007 9:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I prefer
crumb cruncher
"Now, we understand, you're a bug. And bugs will be bugs. But you're our bug now. Don't screw up, and you won't get squashed." - webted

by jamon51 on Dec 4, 2007 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Steve Blake is afraid to shoot
and he shouldn't be our starting pg.  put Jack back with the starters - he can actually drive to the hoop and either score or dish.  I bet most of Blake's assists Jack could easily do, just playing within the offense and making the extra pass.

We can't have two offensive liabilities in the starting lineup, at least Joel brings defense and toughness to this team.

Tell me, what does Steve Blake actually bring to the table that our other 3 pgs can't?

by BlazerBandit on Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM PST reply actions  

Let's see:
Blake plusses:
consistently pushes the ball upcourt fast
runs the break efficiently
uses picks well
often penetrates to the baseline
fights through screens
recognizes potential passing lane steals

Blake minusses:
slow shot release
can't create on the dribble
won't shoot unless he's alone
never pulls up on the pick and roll

Right now, unless Sergio steps it up and makes a better case for himself, I think Blake is our starter.  Jack has been so much more effective as a combo guard off the bench that I can't see giving that up - he's turned into an effective weapon for us.

That said, I really like the idea of trying a Roy/Webster/Jones/Aldridge/Przybilla starting lineup, and putting a little more meat on the table.  Not only that, but Roy, Webster and Jones could pretty much switch on any screen without changing the matchup much.

by webted on Dec 4, 2007 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Roy/Webster/Jones/Aldridge/Przybilla starting line
may have some merit. Like some others here I'm not sure how well Roy would do on defense against faster PG's. On the other hand as has been pointed out our other PG's may not be equipped to stop a fast PG either.

 With everything considered I think this line up is worth a shot. The added Experience of having both Joel and JJ2 on the floor along with the outside shooting of Roy/Web/JJ2 may make up for deficiencies in Roy's defense of PG's. Roy also would have an additional "Over the top" option on most PG's when both shooting an passing. He's darn near Magic Johnson size at 6'6" still shorter but much closer then say Damon Stoudamire, CP3 etc.

At the very least this line up is worth considering to put to rest one way OR the other whether Roy should be our PG of the future.

Give me the big man in the middle already. Even if it's Joel I want a true big man in the paint at all times. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odin)

by Idog1976 on Dec 4, 2007 12:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Roy/Webster/Jones
After watching last nights game, I though that this combo makes sense too - at least at the offensive end.  Both Webster and Jones would spread the defense for Roy (and Aldridge) to operate in the mid-range to the basket.

And if matchups allow for Outlaw to be on the floor too - it could really open up the middle for Roy and Aldridge in a two man game.  

by Tiparillo on Dec 4, 2007 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

disagree
i think jack fights through screens a lot better b/c of the strength that he has.

Running the break isnt all that important especially b/c the blazers never cause turnover and are close to last in the nba in fastbreak points.  We never fastbreak so determining who is better is a non-issue.

The main issue i have is that this season is building for the future and assessing who do we put along with Oden, Roy, and LMA.  Its clear to me that Steve Blake will not be part of that equation.  how many championship level teams starting point guard avg 5 and 5 a game?  JJ has the potential to be much greater and a contributor on this team.

by BlazerBandit on Dec 4, 2007 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Nate?!?
What the??? I'm thinking to myself, Nate is not going to go big with Joel on that last defensive stand? Sure enoough, Rudy Gay follows a miss that Outlaw stood and watched, a miss that Joel would have grabbed. I love Nate as a coach for a lot of reasons, but the X&O's are not one of them.
2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Dec 4, 2007 8:37 AM PST reply actions  

I don't know about that.
LMA was right there, having blocked out Pau Gasol, and in good position for the rebound.  Pau blatantly grabbed and pulled him backwards, which gave Gay the room to get in for the go-ahead tip in.  Trout didn't box Gay out very well, but there should have been a foul called on Gasol.

Memphis was likely to go for a jump shot on that final possession rather than driving, which makes the LMA/Outlaw/Jones seem like a good defensive frontcourt choice: fast, long armed and athletic.  They managed to force a contested outside shot which missed - indicating a good decision to me.  

by webted on Dec 4, 2007 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

So....
So, LMA got held but no call, Outlaw got beat no question. Would Joel have got pulled away by Gasol allowing Gay ro get to the hoop? I think not.
2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Dec 4, 2007 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't see why it would be much different...
...from the play earlier in the quarter, where Pau shoved Raef from behind, reached over his head and stole a board.  

Even Shaq can be moved if you're standing behind him, arms wrapped around his chest, pulling backwards.  

Go look at the game - the final sequence is on the Blazers ESPN homepage - and see for yourself.  

by webted on Dec 4, 2007 12:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Different interpretation
I looked closely at the replay and interpret that LMA/Gasol battle differently. I see LMA doing an excellent job of boxing out Gasol, moving the big man backwards so that another Blazer could grab the rebound. You see Gasol reaching his arms around LMA towards the ball trying to grab it, not trying to pull LMA backwards.

Unfortunately LMA's box out didn't work because Trout failed to box out.

I haven't slept for ten days because that would be too long.

by abetterbomb on Dec 4, 2007 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly
I watched the play repeatedly on my DVR, and the fault was Travis'.  As usual, he took one step towards the penetrator--just enough to get himself slightly out of position, not enough to deter the penetration.  In this case, Outlaw was still in good enough position to box out Gay.  He just failed to do so.

BTW, on the earlier foul shot rebound, Raef boxed out Gasol, but very weakly.  If he had moved backwards into Gasol all, Gasol wouldn't have been able to come over the top for that board.  In Raef's defense, maybe he's just rusty.  He's supposed to be a tougher player than that.

by hurryup09 on Dec 4, 2007 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

i agree
I would always have Joel in for D in that type of situation.

by jksnake99 on Dec 4, 2007 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Outlaw
I say fly Pappa Outlaw to all the games! Let Trout play in front of friend and family all the time. Make them part of the TV crew or something.
DJ in Eugene

by djudd on Dec 4, 2007 12:05 PM PST reply actions  

I don't want to post a diary
But isn't Thursday's game televised on TNT?  I get to watch the Blazers for only the second time this season.  Think of all the comments I can make, after I actually get to watch them play.  Woo Hoo!

Nice Recap Dave!

The sublime moment: Ball touches nothing but net. Greg squeals in delight! -- Elaine from HoopFest Haiku, 2001

by tominhawaii on Dec 4, 2007 2:57 PM PST reply actions  

yep
TNT.

I will look forward to hearing what Kenny Smith and Charles Barkley have to say about the Blazers.

by jksnake99 on Dec 4, 2007 3:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm