Recap: Blazers 106, Grizzlies 105
Ahhhhh...winning makes everything fun again, doesn't it? You need those every once in a while.
Team Observations
It's funny how giddy I feel after watching the game because I've actually seen the Blazers play much better than they did tonight. We didn't defend or rebound particularly toughly through most of the game. We relied far too heavily on the three-point shot. We had major lapses in concentration down to the very last moments of the game. If you asked me if we could win a game while playing this way again I'd say, "Sure, but I wouldn't want to try it too often." But we did enough to overcome our deficiencies and stepped up when it counted, which is all that matters for tonight.
Speaking of, let's talk about some of the things we did well. First off, in a relatively fast-paced game we committed only 10 turnovers. Memphis did score 21 off of those but that was negated by the 27 points we scored off of their 15 turnovers. Converting that many T.O.'s into points was a huge boost. We did a reasonable job of staying in between them and the rim. We had lapses but most often they were shooting over people. We didn't get anywhere near their perimeter shooters but I'd rather have that than a parade into the lane all night long. The shot distribution was probably what we need to play winning basketball. We shared the ball fine, dishing out 26 assists, but when push came to shove Lamarcus and Brandon were the guys shooting the ball. They attempted a combined 44 of our 84 shots. Outlaw added 13 attempts because he was the hot hand late. Przybilla had 3, Blake 4, LaFrentz 1, Sergio 0. We need to find the right combination of the ball moving but still having our best players take most of the shots. We found that combination tonight. Granted it was a against a Memphis defense that wouldn't scare a reasonable-sized Beanie Baby, but that's still something. We also compensated for players who were hot and cold. Guys who missed (outside of our main two) didn't get more shots. Guys who were hot got fed. This is also a sign of maturity. Not that I expect it to stick, but it's good to see it's possible.
Most of all I loved how the team turned it up in the third and fourth quarters. Brandon Roy led the charge, waking up from his slump to punish the Grizzlies. One he sparked it set the team on fire. We decided not to lose this game and we did enough to give ourselves a chance. Yes, some of those shots were lucky but we put ourselves in a situation where getting lucky was possible. That's not bad for this team...certainly better than some of our recent efforts.
Individual Observations
--What the dee-diddly-dang-dang happened to Travis? Somewhere around the end of the third quarter he ducked out, changed out of his mild-mannered Floppy Fish suit, and became SUPER TROUT. And boy did we need him. His greatest strength is that he can get a shot up anywhere, anytime over anybody when single-covered. We put ourselves in a position where that mattered tonight and Travis really came through. He hit a couple of last-second bail-out shots that defied belief. It's a good thing he hit that game-winner too because it looked for all the world like he was primarily responsible for letting Rudy Gay slip through for the offensive rebound off of that Navarro miss on the penultimate play of the game. It would have been easier to win it by boxing out Gay, but it was more ESPN-worthy to win it like he did.
--After another shaky start Brandon Roy CAME ALIVE! 26 points, 9 rebounds, 7 assists looks pretty darn good to me. He's the one who got us back in this game, make no mistake. People were getting pretty uptight about his slump because we had not seen him do that before. He's going to have stretches like that, especially against good defensive teams. For all we know he may still be in the thick of his current slump. But it doesn't matter because you know he's going to come out of it and be the solid player he's always been. Don't fret about this guy. He is the man.
--Lamarcus had another fantastic outing in most ways. He shot efficiently and well and scored 23. He played some great defense on Pau Gasol right through the closing minutes of the game. He only got 5 boards, 2 defensive, which is a concern. He didn't get any free throw attempts. Part of that was the style of offense he was playing and part of it was that the two teams combined for only 26 free throws total. Still, he needs moves in his arsenal that will draw him fouls. That will be the difference between him scoring 19 and 25 a game.
--Steve Blake had 6 assists and 3 steals and played appropriately. I got frustrated with him a couple times as he refused to take shots when he should have, leading to bad offensive possessions for us. But I wouldn't be surprised if part of the game plan was to run through the two main guys so maybe he had that in mind.
--Joel Przybilla also contributed nicely, helping defensively against Gasol as well. He really frustrated me by picking up a couple of stupid fouls though. We need him available as an option and he takes himself right out of the game when he has mental lapses like that.
--For the first three quarters of this game Martell Webster was an El stinko burrito with a side of suckamole. Not only was he not hitting shots, he virtually disappeared off of the court in a manner we haven't seen since last season. His defense, rebounding, and energy all went to pot like his warranty had just expired. However when Brandon stepped up in the fourth Martell did also. Hopefully he'll be back to regular form next game.
--James Jones was a huge hero in this game. He shot 6-7 overall including 4-4 from the three-point line. His 16 points spread out the Grizzlies' defense and freed up room for others to drive and shoot. His release was quick too! I assume he won't shoot like this every night but even once in a while is fine.
--I still love it every time Jarrett Jack drives. Keep it up! He missed his jumpers tonight but that will happen with him.
One-Sentence Game Summary:
Buzzer beaters make the whole world happy!
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lucky
Roy was lucky that Outlaw was able to tip the ball to Blake and get the return pass and "3" for Outlaw.
Still think we played too many point guards, but maybe Jones will become the 2-guard since Roy will play PG in the 4th quarter whether he does it well or not. Jack and Blake seem worthless when Roy is controlling the ball.
Glad to see the centers playing center, but Joel had stupid fouls and Raef didn't control the boards (although that may be because his teammates don't block out).
Still, a win is a win even if one doesn't "deserve" it.
Re/ boxing out on the boards
Speaking of not boxing out: sandwiched between Outlaw's two great final shots was another Travis 4th quarter boner. Namely, it was Travis who failed to box out Gay--his man--on that putback play. If Travis had just put a body on his man--like they teach you in grade school--that last-instant shot would have been unnecessary.
I'll bet Nate would like to outfit a couple of his young players with shock collars during practices. Then Nate could give 'em a little buzz every time they forgot to block out. THAT'D solve the problem! :-)
I'm really glad we won
However, I'm a little disturbed. Seems like the only way The Blazers win on the road is if I go against them winning in the jersey contest. Started this month out with a new philosophy, and it was the first road game where I wasn't a homer, and did NOT pick The Blazers to win.
So what do I do? As a Blazer fan I feel it is more important that the team do well. Guess I will just have to keep going against them, until they lose. I'd feel bad if I went back to picking them to win, and then they started losing again.
So GO BLAZERS! I'll do my part and pick you to lose!
Me too
Luck
Was it just me or did Jones hold the ball for about 8 seconds before finding Outlaw on the last play? Maybe it was just time standing still...or maybe Jones has some veteran credibility built up...
I think what people mean by "luck" is
However that doesn't take away the fact that we did put ourselves in position to take advantage of those plays when they happened. That is something that can carry over to other games and if we do it enough we won't need miracle shots to win (or at least not as many).
--Dave
I think Travis has show time and time again
Who other than Roy, LMA and Trout do we want taking a last second shot?
Thanks Dave
It seems with Travis, the theory is if we keep relying on him in the 4th quarter, the law of averages says that he will come through at least every once in a while.
Don't get me wrong, I am still happy they won, but if they had lost, the 6 times I muttered Travis' name would be what I remember and not the 6 times I said, "Yes, Travis."
In reality, I think I would be calling for his head because of that offensive rebound he gave up with 2 seconds left. Why guess where the ball is going to come off when you can slam your a** into your man and keep him 6 feet from the hoop while Jones or Aldridge get the board. Enjoy the win, but let's take the easier path next time.
It was a solid six seconds...
But good breaks or no, that was a nice win. It's tough to win on the road when the opponent is shooting well, and for awhile there it seemed like every Grizzlie 3-point attempt went in. The bottom line is that the Blazers played well enough to win. That's about all any NBA team can do on the road--especially on a back-to-back: play tough and hope for a couple of breaks down the stretch.
6 seconds...
5 seconds actually
Jones passed the ball just before the 5th time ref swung his arm. It's close but Jones made it without a doubt.
They also do that to count the seconds players stay inside the paint area as well.
Ah--I didn't know that
That actually seems like a good system. Perfectly accurate, no, but it's fair in that all the players know the status of the countdown. As a (relative) vet, Jones probably knew just where he stood--close to a violation, but not quite.
They never, ever
--Dave
Thanks for counting that
Anyway, it is nice to catch a break every once in a while.
If you ever check the DVR again, see if you can count how many times Navarro shuffled his feet without dribbling to set up his threes. I am pretty sure it was at least three times.
(I'm really not bitter about officiating, I know it comes and goes and they miss some and give you some. It was just hard not to notice once I saw the first one.)
Nice color
The Blazers are entering a new phase it feels like. Giving Roy the ball and letting him create. Getting Jones back and making outside shots. It opens up the middle and allows us to operate with out two studs. Your summary is the exclamation point on my assertion that the offense merely needed to be dangerous from 3 to open it up. Can Outlaw and Webster and Jones do that? They had an up close lesson tonight from Miller on how to be effective. Is it Miller that makes Pau dangerous?
For all the criticism of Coach Nate here lately perhaps there is some corresponding praise when we win.
James Jones
True, Jones won't be hot every night. But between Jones, Martell, and Outlaw, now there's three small forwards who might have the hot hand on a given night. That's a definite plus.
I am also remembering
This is some o' Dat!
mikebarrettsblog.blogspot.com/
What Happened?
honkaplayboys.comDaily Dime Props
Travis Outlaw, Blazers forward: Hits the winning 6-foot runner at the buzzer, lifting the Blazers to a 106-105 win in Memphis. Finished with 21 overall, including a 30-footer at the end of the third quarter.
Great win, DirecTV sucks
Medford and KXL is in and out. Comcast and DirecTV
exec's should have their favorite teams games
taken away for while to see if they like the
feeling. Thank goodness for National TV on Thursday.
whew!
That was a long 2.9 seconds.
Why all the 'ya they won but they were lucky' thoughts? So what? A little luck never hurt anybody.
And where's fatty?
Fatty banished himself
It was really kind of a crazy, inexplicable move on Fatty's part. As I said at the time, his self-banishing accomplished nothing except hurt a bunch of people who enjoyed having him here.
But who knows? Maybe Fatty also ritually flayed himself with willow branches.
damn.....
Thanks
Yes, a man of his word...
Oh yeah, Dave doesn't like swearing. He's got this little pantscrapper now, and he's looking to avoid trouble with the missus...
Steve Blake is afraid to shoot
We can't have two offensive liabilities in the starting lineup, at least Joel brings defense and toughness to this team.
Tell me, what does Steve Blake actually bring to the table that our other 3 pgs can't?
by BlazerBandit on Dec 4, 2007 8:17 AM PST reply actions
Let's see:
consistently pushes the ball upcourt fast
runs the break efficiently
uses picks well
often penetrates to the baseline
fights through screens
recognizes potential passing lane steals
Blake minusses:
slow shot release
can't create on the dribble
won't shoot unless he's alone
never pulls up on the pick and roll
Right now, unless Sergio steps it up and makes a better case for himself, I think Blake is our starter. Jack has been so much more effective as a combo guard off the bench that I can't see giving that up - he's turned into an effective weapon for us.
That said, I really like the idea of trying a Roy/Webster/Jones/Aldridge/Przybilla starting lineup, and putting a little more meat on the table. Not only that, but Roy, Webster and Jones could pretty much switch on any screen without changing the matchup much.
Roy/Webster/Jones/Aldridge/Przybilla starting line
With everything considered I think this line up is worth a shot. The added Experience of having both Joel and JJ2 on the floor along with the outside shooting of Roy/Web/JJ2 may make up for deficiencies in Roy's defense of PG's. Roy also would have an additional "Over the top" option on most PG's when both shooting an passing. He's darn near Magic Johnson size at 6'6" still shorter but much closer then say Damon Stoudamire, CP3 etc.
At the very least this line up is worth considering to put to rest one way OR the other whether Roy should be our PG of the future.
Roy/Webster/Jones
And if matchups allow for Outlaw to be on the floor too - it could really open up the middle for Roy and Aldridge in a two man game.
disagree
Running the break isnt all that important especially b/c the blazers never cause turnover and are close to last in the nba in fastbreak points. We never fastbreak so determining who is better is a non-issue.
The main issue i have is that this season is building for the future and assessing who do we put along with Oden, Roy, and LMA. Its clear to me that Steve Blake will not be part of that equation. how many championship level teams starting point guard avg 5 and 5 a game? JJ has the potential to be much greater and a contributor on this team.
by BlazerBandit on Dec 4, 2007 1:49 PM PST up reply actions
Nate?!?
I don't know about that.
Memphis was likely to go for a jump shot on that final possession rather than driving, which makes the LMA/Outlaw/Jones seem like a good defensive frontcourt choice: fast, long armed and athletic. They managed to force a contested outside shot which missed - indicating a good decision to me.
So....
I don't see why it would be much different...
Even Shaq can be moved if you're standing behind him, arms wrapped around his chest, pulling backwards.
Go look at the game - the final sequence is on the Blazers ESPN homepage - and see for yourself.
Different interpretation
Unfortunately LMA's box out didn't work because Trout failed to box out.
Exactly
BTW, on the earlier foul shot rebound, Raef boxed out Gasol, but very weakly. If he had moved backwards into Gasol all, Gasol wouldn't have been able to come over the top for that board. In Raef's defense, maybe he's just rusty. He's supposed to be a tougher player than that.
Outlaw
I don't want to post a diary
Nice Recap Dave!

by 




















