Game 31 Preview: Blazers at Jazz
A Look at the Jazz
The Jazz are on a disastrous 4-11 run in the month of December. What has gone wrong? Part of it has been a brutal schedule. 7 of their 14 games this month have been against upper-echelon teams. Also their Big Three have been underperforming. Carlos Boozer has been the steadiest but he's slightly off of his scoring average. Deron Williams more so, plus he's turning the ball over a ton. Mehmet Okur has been out half the month with a shoulder injury and hasn't contributed much when he's played. When those three aren't clicking Utah has a hard time staying on an even keel. Worse, they've been giving up a substantial number of points: 117 to Sacramento, 125 to Dallas, 116 to Atlanta, 123 to the L*kers, all this month. Their defense has allowed an average of 109.3 ppg this month. They're a good offensive team but not that good. They're not getting back in transition and they're not getting out to guard the perimeter most nights.
Nevertheless this is not the end of the Jazz. Their schedule gets exponentially easier the next two months. Plus they still do a ton of things well. Carlos Boozer is a fantastic rebounder and scorer. Deron Williams is still shooting 50% and averaging 9 assists per game. The Jazz smash their opponents in rebounds, assists, steals and forced turnovers, and especially shooting percentage. They haven't forgotten how and where to score. You can get easy shots on them, but they'll get easy shots on you too.
The Jazz know this game means something to them. After Portland's 13-1 month and leapfrogging them in the standings Utah will want to send a message. We're likely to see a motivated club tonight.
What I'd Like To See
- We cannot come out flat like we have been the last few games. During the heart of the winning streak we were jumping on opponents early. Lately we've been flat and depended on fourth-quarter heroics to pull us through. Fourth-quarter heroics don't happen nearly as often on the road, though. We better come with intensity from the get-go.
- A large part of our dominance has been doubling up people in free throw attempts. We need to be aggressive getting to the rim tonight. The long shot will always be there but it will be hard to win with bombs alone. We need some infantry work too.
- We need Lamarcus Aldridge to come through with a big game. We can't depend on Channing or Joel to stop Boozer. Lamarcus can't really stop him either but at least he can score with him.
- Our White Unit has to dominate their bench. Scoring-wise that's certainly possible but we also need some toughness and attitude from the second unit. They have a lot of energy players. We can't get outworked or bullied around and expect to win.
- Utah will pick your pockets until they hit lint...and then some. Taking care of the ball is the one thing that has sustained us so far. We need to do it again tonight.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. Believe it or not I have to work this evening...as in all night. The game recap and final jersey scores will probably not come until Tuesday morning.
P.P.S. Ben has heroically volunteered to step in with a recap this evening in my absence, so watch for that!
0 recs |
18
comments
Comments
Blazers Frontline
by kenzc76 on Dec 31, 2007 3:21 AM PST 0 recs
We need to keep
by howlingfantods on Dec 31, 2007 10:05 AM PST 0 recs
Just coming off an emotional win,
by edgeguy42 on Dec 31, 2007 12:39 PM PST 0 recs
This is really
--Dave
by Dave on
Dec 31, 2007 12:59 PM PST
up
0 recs
Yeah
I'll take a wait and see approach. I honestly do not see a game on the schedule where the Blazers should lose. A team might steal one or two games from the Blazers, but the streak shouldn't end until it's up in the 30's or 40's.
by tominhawaii on
Dec 31, 2007 1:13 PM PST
up
0 recs
You are joking right?
by Jason3123 on
Dec 31, 2007 3:28 PM PST
up
0 recs
Yeah
by tominhawaii on
Dec 31, 2007 3:47 PM PST
up
0 recs
Of course not
The real problem is that he has a family. No sense of priority. I mean, in three years, this is the second game he's missed. How many normal guys miss two days of work in three years? This guy's a slacker.
by jscot on
Jan 1, 2008 3:29 AM PST
up
0 recs
He always gets the summer off too
by tominhawaii on
Jan 1, 2008 11:30 AM PST
up
0 recs
The best part--
And if they WIN, well, then we are amazing.
AND we'll still have the Wolves up next to get eaten up for #15, and then a big franchise-win-streak-tying possible #16 game against the Bulls on TNT.
Like Dave says, we can't lose.
I predict LMA is sick of not playing in the 4th and will come out BIG this road trip-- ESPECIALLY against the Bulls on national TV. You know the broadcast will keep pointing out how the Bulls passed him up and all, so it'll be nice if LMA helps the storyline by tearing them up.
6 games above .500... insane.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Dec 31, 2007 1:14 PM PST
up
0 recs
Yes,
-we've already succeeded beyond all expectations.
But all look to see the the next level.
by edgeguy42 on Dec 31, 2007 1:15 PM PST 0 recs
But at what cost?
by tominhawaii on
Dec 31, 2007 1:33 PM PST
up
0 recs
Winning
by Jason3123 on
Dec 31, 2007 3:29 PM PST
up
0 recs
I used to think that way
I believe it would be better for the team to lose the rest of the games this season, draft the player of their choosing and buy-out or cut one of the current players. Actually, cut or buy-out two since Rudy will be there next year.
The sensible person would say that packaging two Blazers and the low draft pick for a higher pick would be more economical. Well I say poppycock! The Blazers do not want to be at the mercy of another team that might demand an asset that KP is unwilling to part with. If the Blazers lose out, they will be in the drivers seat and they can draft and cut anyone they want.
by tominhawaii on
Dec 31, 2007 3:46 PM PST
up
0 recs
I hope I understand
-but if you mean those who had hoped this to be a losing season for a better draft pick with what we've already got coming here next year? What can we say? Ok, DON'T enjoy these wins!!! Yip, lets curse the Blazers success be sure we moveup 3 draft positions!!
by edgeguy42 on Dec 31, 2007 1:54 PM PST 0 recs
Exactly!
by tominhawaii on
Dec 31, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
0 recs
One more reason
by jscot on
Jan 1, 2008 3:26 AM PST
up
0 recs
You are wise
by tominhawaii on
Jan 1, 2008 11:29 AM PST
up
0 recs







