Game 21 Recap: Blazers 97, Jazz 89
The NBA: Where unpossible happens.
Beers for all. And remember, there's no crying in basketball!
Team Observations
If you told me before the game that we would let the Jazz have 22 offensive rebounds, get outrebounded by 13 total, and commit 19 turnovers I'd have said Jazz win by double digits. So what the heck happened?
First of all that was the worst job handling a zone defense since the Battle of Verdun. Watching the Blazers defend the rim man-to-man early in the game was like going to the high school dance and watching your sister disappear behind the gym with the entire football team, one by one. But then we threw on the zone and the Jazz just disintegrated. Where they had been driving with impunity they started shooting jumpers. They also started missing jumpers. Sure they rebounded the ball well but then they usually missed again. They ended up shooting 38% for the game. Understandably we never really abandoned the zone. To the Blazers' credit we were quite active in it as opposed to the "the ball's out of my area, let me relax" zone we often see. Meanwhile the Blazers were hitting their jumpers, which opened up the lane for driving. A couple of guys took advantage, and it was enough to stave off the late Jazz run.
A few things besides the defense went exactly right in this game. First we killed them in free throw attempts and makes. Second we bugged the heck out of Deron Williams. Third we got really tough in this game, throwing nasty elbows, taking hard fouls, and resorting to cheap, underhanded tricks. Ask me if I liked that. Go ahead. Ask me. HECK YEAH I LIKED THAT. Be gentlemen and fantastic citizens off the court. Do any darn thing you can to get the win on the court. The Jazz weren't up to being pushed around and it showed. Maybe, just maybe, this will be a growing up point for the team.
We were really fortunate all of those shots fell early, otherwise this would have been a 75-68 affair. I don't think we can live forever shooting all those jumpers to start out. But tonight we executed and shot very well. Oh, and we beat the Jazz!
Individual Notes
--What's my name? Martell Webster. No, I said, "WHAT'S MY NAME?!?" MARTELL FREAKIN' WEBSTER. That's right. And don't forget it. From minute one it became clear that we were riding Webster tonight and he came through like nobody's business. He shot like he was all alone on the court. He scored 25 and the great thing is he did it on only 13 shots. It's not like he was firing every possession. His play opened up the court for everybody else. It was perhaps the most professional game I've seen him play. And the strategy was brilliant. Nobody else would have had the same effect by making their shots. Triple huzzahs for him.
--Jarrett Jack also had a brilliant run in the first half. When he came in we were still shooting jumpers almost exclusively. We were hitting them, but you were wondering when the clock was going to strike midnight and the coach become a pumpkin again. Jack said, "Fairy Godmother THIS!" and drove it down the teeth of the defense. He ended up 5-8 from the floor and 6-6 from the charity stripe. He still had a couple of shaky turnovers but who cares. He led the charge in the paint.
--After hitting a couple of early jumpers Brandon went into a lull for a while, only to emerge driving in the fourth quarter. Martell and Jarrett set up the win but Brandon clinched it by holding off the Jazz rally.
--I thought Outlaw also played solidly and I was impressed that he didn't come in and shoot 22 shots just because Lamarcus was out and he (Travis) had been the hot hand lately. The Jazz defense was already weakening and Travis put that last bit of pressure on that made it snap. A lot of guys got open shots when he was on the court.
--Don't discount Blake's role in helping on Williams and managing the offense. He was really active out there and helped the Blazers set up their offense early.
--"Timmy, you eat your vegetables or I'm going to make you watch Channing Frye play interior defense!" (GULP! CHEW-CHEW-CHEW!) He did hit a couple of nice shots though and he did get down the court quickly on offense. Maybe he has some potential as a part-time mate to Oden when Lamarcus is resting. He could fill that "sprint down the floor and dunk" role.
--Read my lips: that's Joel Przybilla. Jo...el...Pryz...bil...la. STOP PASSING TO HIM IN TRAFFIC! Every time the ball clangs off of his hands underneath the basket it's a sure layup for the opponent because he can't get back down the court quickly enough. However Joel stayed out of foul trouble, in the game, and was the only guy watching the cup and rebounding. This was the best game he's had all year in my estimation. Without him I don't think we win.
--LaFrentz, Rodriguez, and Jones all served their purpose, which was to keep the court warm while the guys above them in the rotation rested.
From the Unintentionally Funny File:
The Jazz broadcast opened with clips of a visit to an area children's hospital, complete with mascot. Because, you know, that's exactly what every sick, near-helpless four-year-old wants to see at his bedside: a huge, unidentified, hairy beast. Seriously, the kid looked freaked. Nice job.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. Did I mention we beat the Jazz?!?!?
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
HELLS YEAH BABY!!
THATS RIGHT US!!
Second only to Boston (go fig)
I HATE SLC and the Jazz, horrible place and this victory was so fat the sweetest of the year for me. On the road against the Jazz?? Without LMA?? I CANNOT wait until Friday as I have my tickets and I am ready to go and see them get stomped!!
by SpyderRyder on Dec 12, 2007 1:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great write-up Dave
by coolguyrob on Dec 12, 2007 1:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
nice!
by nateinaloha on Dec 12, 2007 3:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That was sweet!
To single out one play: towards the end, Outlaw outquicked Millsap to a critical rebound. This was EXACTLY the kind of play that others have been making on Outlaw all season long. And Millsap is EXACTLY the type of player who's been doing it to him. This time, it was Outlaw who was alert and determined and the opponent who was caught napping. How sweet was that? Our young Blazers are growing up by leaps and bounds.
Sure they might get drilled by Golden State tonight. But I don't really care; I'll be savoring this win for awhile.
by hurryup09 on Dec 12, 2007 7:06 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No, what was sweet was........
by 24thewho on Dec 12, 2007 9:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Something's different about T-Bone
by Jason3123 on Dec 12, 2007 8:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Joel's first
by TwoDeep on Dec 12, 2007 9:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think I found
by jamon51 on Dec 12, 2007 9:43 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Beers for all.
Did you hear the comment that Brandon bought dinner for the team the night it was announced he'd won Player of the Week? For him, it's all about the team. What a breath of fresh air. Bet HE won't grouse when he doesn't make the All-Star team!! He's one billion times better as a role model than most of the guys who will be voted in.
by jorga on Dec 12, 2007 10:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Best. Recap. Ever
'Watching the Blazers defend the rim man-to-man early in the game was like going to the high school dance and watching your sister disappear behind the gym with the entire football team, one by one.'
Unbelievably awesome.
by mikejones on Dec 12, 2007 10:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting Verdun analogy . . .
The Blazers' zone defense worked against what is the superior Jazz offense (most of the time) just as the French trench warfare stopped the superior German advance. General Nate out-manuevered General Jerry.
How did we survive those 22 offensive rebounds? Did the zone defense really rattle Deron Williams into a 4 for 14 shooting night? Was it German-like arrogance on Sloan's part that his superior offense would overcome the Blazers' trench defense? Will the WWI defenses hold up against the "shock and awe" offense of Golden State?
I was amazed and delighted we beat the Jazz. The zone really seemed to work; we had another super-hot shooter (Martell this time), and we made some really critical plays (I thought Blakes steals against Boozer may have been the most critical plays of the game -- well, Jack hit a big jumper and Martell hits those big shots, and . . .).
While it might be WWI strategy, I liked that our centers played center, our PFs played PF, SFs played SF, and guards played guard. Roy didn't play too much PG, Blake played well at PG and complemented Roy well; Jack did some good things at the 2-guard.
Will the WWI/Verdun strategy (once I use the analogy I tend to beat it to death) carry us through the next few games or even the season? I don't think so. We cannot get drubbed on the offense boards like this. We cannot give up so many points-in-the-paint. We cannot rely on the opponent's super-star having an off-night. We cannot have so many bone-headed turnovers (sorry, Travis, but some of those T.O.s . . .). We really do need to run some and create/force some T.O.s by the opponents. We cannot rely on our jump shooters to shoot 70% from the field.
So, General Nate, I look forward to the evolving strategy that best uses the troops we have.
by vcubed on Dec 12, 2007 1:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The biggest surprise to me
We still tried to give the game away by giving up all those offensive boards in the second half, though.
by howlingfantods on Dec 12, 2007 8:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















