Game 10 recap: Blazers 90 Wizards 109
One-Sentence Game Summary: The NBA: Where embarrassing happens.
This recap is going to be short and sweet. There are dozens of things we could talk about explaining the loss tonight but it boils down to this:
Seeing that we have such a young team (as we have talked about ad nauseum) I am able to make a lot of allowances. If we get beat by a superstar we don't know how to stop or can't get calls against I'm fine with that. If we get beat by an overwhelming offensive attack that breaks down the somewhat flimsy dam of our lopsided defense I'm fine with that. If we get beat because it's an off night and our open shots aren't falling for some weird reason and we lose confidence I'm fine with that. If we get beat because the other team makes adjustments that we're not familiar with and haven't learned to cope with I'm fine with that. Heck, if a couple of players make enormous mental errors looking like deer in the headlights I'm fine with that too. Learning the game can be bewildering. But the one thing I should never, ever have to say with this young team--especially this young team--is that they got outworked, outhustled, and that the other team played with far more desire. This team has been put together for that express purpose with exactly those kind of players. If we don't have that going for us, what hope do we have? Age is no factor when it comes to this. You go out there every night and play like you want it, even if you're not quite sure how to get it.
Unfortunately that's exactly what happened tonight. Washington--short their star player mind you--had far more passion, desire, and grit from the opening tip until nearly the final horn. We played flat, soggy, and impotently. We settled for horrible shots, we ran down the clock to no purpose, we didn't seem to help or communicate on defense (let alone stop anyone individually), we turned the ball over ridiculously, and we let them get any number of critical rebounds. We never threatened them at all. The Wizards were so far in their comfort zone they might as well have played in E-Z chairs. We were so far out of ours that it looked like we were junior high boys at our first dance and the ball was the entire cheerleading squad. We didn't just fail to take this game, we practically ran from it.
You may have noticed tonight that we tried to pressure the ball, returning the favor for what teams have done to us. I was watching a possession where we trapped the dribbler just across the halfcourt line. The guy passed the ball down to the scoring area. I didn't follow the ball though, I watched the guy who had just passed it. After he released the ball his defenders just stood, as if saying, "Well, my part in this scheme is over." Both of them relaxed visibly. It was only for a second or so, but that second was enough to pretty much invalidate the good that had come from the trap in the first place. Both the offensive player and the ball were now on the move and the two trappers were now behind the play instead of disrupting it. I don't think we ever need to see anything like that again.
What will fix this? There are any number of technical adjustments but before any of them will work we have to get a few things straight:
- You play every game like you are there to win it. You run, dive, drive, pound, and pressure until you can't stand up anymore. Each player commits to never being the last guy down the floor, never being the guy who stands flat-footed while somebody else gets the rebound, never giving up on a defensive stop or possession until that ball is ours again.
- You don't shoot at the basket, you attack it. Enough pretty scoring. Enough getting blown out in points in the paint. Own that key, drive full throttle, get around people and throw down.
- You make the opponent as uncomfortable as possible and your teammates as comfortable as possible. When the enemy has the ball you harass, double, jump, and go all-out. Each wide-open shot--or worse wide-open lane--is like a personal insult. You communicate and help your teammates with their defensive assignments, making it easier on them to do their jobs. Every made bucket reflects on all of you. When you have the ball you get guys into open positions (somewhere inside the three-point arc please), you get the ball to them, and you tell them to score. You set HARD picks and play as energetically when you are away from the ball as you do when you have it. You lift each other up in the huddle and tell everybody to keep working for and taking those smart shots. You rebound as a team and attack with five people every time a shot goes up instead of watching it. You assume they missed every time and get...that...ball.
- If someone pushes you, you push back. If they pull a knife, you pull a gun (figuratively speaking, of course). If they come with two people, you bring three. If they want to throw down with the whole team, then it's World War Three baby and all of your teammates are behind you. When that ball goes up it ain't a tea party. It's like the prison yard. You're either the Big Dog or the guy...well, who isn't the big dog. You aren't here to make friends or to look good. You are here to impose and enforce your will, period.
Here's to a better, more focused, and pretty much angry game in Charlotte. We better make the Bobcats remember our name.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Agree
In a strange way I hope it's number 2 because that can be fixed. If it's number one then Kevin Pritchard has to look at tweaking the roster even more than he had wanted.
by blazermaniac32 on Nov 17, 2007 9:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
pick n roll
of course, there are many many things that we can all point to that went to the $#itter tonight.
I think we're going to be alright in the effort and hustle dept. to me, it looks more like a deer in headlight thing (brought on by many of the reasons for acceptable losing that you put forth) than a desire issue.
As much as we have great building blocks, we're also missing some pieces and some serious experience.
this year, there will be nights we look like world beaters, others like a JV squad.
All that said, my major pet peeve tonite was the blazers inability to execute the high pick and roll, compounded by the fact that we run it SO much, against pedestrian defenders.
Not once tonight did our designated big guy setting the pick actually roll to the basket AND look for the ball. LMA weakly popped. Joel rolled with his back to the ball, hands at his side.
Washington's defenders routinely doubled the ball off the P n R, and we never made them pay for it.
This is a coaching problem right?
Of course, if we were running the ball like we're capable of, we wouldn't have to run the high pick n roll so much. but that's another issue.
by royalridge on Nov 17, 2007 9:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
wow what a game
They have been telling me for 2 years don't expect win's but effort, and I can take that but first the lack of effort in the secound half (they weren't even playing good in the first half said Nate)of Philly now the next game too.
Antonio Harvey thought that after tonight game the coach should give the guys a day off on sunday to go to the movie's to relax.WOW !!!!
I know that he was a player at one point but these guy's hardley even worked up a sweat.Let's see that hustle that was supposed to be there...
by wegotjs on Nov 17, 2007 10:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
what??
This was bad but certainly not the worst Blazer performance of the past 25 years.
Has everyone forgotten that we are 4-6, not 1-9? This team isn't awesome or consistent but they aren't terrible either. Lethargic efforts happen in the NBA unfortunately.
by jksnake99 on Nov 17, 2007 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone seemed to agree
This is a fragile group of players because they are so young. I remember a few years back the collection of all-stars and former lottery picks this team included were completely taken out of a playoff series against San Antonio by one lucky shot from Sean Elliott. Rational expectations say they should have bounced back and been competitive for the remainder of the series. But that didn't happen. Instead they were completely haunted by the one shot.
If a playoff team with established veterans can be rattled and made irrelevant, we should be prepared for similar hurdles befuddling this young group. Winning on the road may be a big obstacle for them at this point. It seemed that tonight's game was being played as an extension of the second half of the Sixers game.
Apparently it will take them longer than a day to process a loss like that and put it behind them. But at some point they will get a road win and the monkey will be off their backs and their confidence will return.
If we can focus on the positives it will make it easier to maintain sanity. They opened the season playing well against San Antonio. They built a 25 point lead at Philadelphia. They can do those things again. Sure, it's a small list at this point but it's going to get longer before this season is over.
Patience Blazer fans.
by bbfred on Nov 17, 2007 10:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Some questions for the coaching staff
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 17, 2007 11:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think Nate shot himself in the foot
Secondly, by announcing this decision, he was forced to stick with it, even when the coarse of the game revealed it to be a stunningly poor decision. Our offense was to stagnant, uncreative, and without any energy starting the 2nd quarter, it was the ideal time to plug in Sergio and see if he could light a fire under the teams ass. instead, Nate puts in Green not against a trap, and we all saw what happens.
I actually like green and would like to see him get more playing time, but at the right times. Nate handcuffed himself in how he should use our back-up guards by making that statement.
Anyway, i think it's unfortunate that Nate's biggest adjustment after Philly was to bench Sergio--talk about a red herring! Sergio wasn't the problem in the game (one of the only two players with a positive +/- in that game) just like he wasn't a problem in last night's lost. Nate needs to listen to his assistant coaches more and put the Spanish Spark Plug in the game when the game needs him, and to get over his personal crap. Sergio hasn't had the best numbers this season, but he also has really got some crap playing time, a lot of 4 minutes stretches, which, as a point-guard, is hard to get into the flow of the game at all. Personally, i'd rather see him benched than getting 9 minutes a game. Since Jack's semi-move to SG, he stills plays a decent chunk of his minutes at PG, during which time he is a very ineffective PG, as usual this season. I think those minutes would be far better used getting our younger PGs some real playing time.
by sergioFTW on Nov 18, 2007 8:48 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure what you were watching
Portland did not lose this game because of who played backup PG. The way Portland played, Rodriguez could have had a career night and they would still have lost.
We all know Sergio is your guy. We know that you think McMillan is giving him short shift. Hammering Nate for the reasons you give above because of this only dims your credibility.
Personally, I thought Green sucked. Not sure I saw one good decision by him out there. For all those folks thinking he's our future PG, think again. Green might, MIGHT, stick around the NBA for several years. The odds are long he'll ever be a starting NBA PG. That said, I'm not going to judge him on one game.
As for Sergio, he's going to have a tough time getting minutes so long as Nate thinks he screws up the defense. The Blazers are a poor defensive team as it is. I'm pretty sure Nate is thinking he can't afford to mess it up even more. That may be unfair to Rodriguez, but those are the breaks. Unfortunately for him, he isn't on a strong defensive team that has the luxury of giving minutes to an offensive spark plug that acts like molasses in the tank on the defensive side of the ball.
by timg56 on Nov 19, 2007 6:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, oh ....
Brandon says we may not have the horses to both play a tight defense as well as run and trap. If we have to give one of them up it's not hard to guess which one Nate will ditch. (I personally would favor slacking up on the defense a little if we had to, and develop the run and gun game so we wouldn't have to start from scratch with that next year.
Nate says we are thin on big men. If that is so why does Joel NEVER get any more than 20 some minutes of playing time??!
And if Nate truly wants to run, why oh why isn't Sergio getting more playing time .... way more? With that Taurean Green announcement yesterday ... well this is really getting to be a sore point with me.
Ok, if we want to slow it up, we're going to need a good low post scorer. You think Zbo is available?(+:
From what I've seen from the last few Blazer performances, I think we fans better not be expecting the team to pick up where they left off at the Rose Garden. It looks like the NBA is figuring us out.
My preference would be to use this year to build a run and gun offense and a trapping defense with Sergio given a chance to spear-head the offense; then wait until next year to focus on developing a lock-down defense until next year when Goden joins the team.
I know, I know - we need to rebound to run. So then play Joel for god sake! Maybe even Raef once in a while.
by TwoDeep on Nov 18, 2007 10:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
no direction on offense
by sergioFTW on Nov 18, 2007 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Abandoning defense for the run and gun
People seem to forget that Phoenix is a pretty decent rebounding team and not all that bad at playing defense. Portland can't do either. Until we get guys that can dominate the boards, we are probably better off learning how to execute half court sets and how to control the tempo of a game. Those are leasons that will serve the Blazers well later on when they have the personnel to run.
by timg56 on Nov 19, 2007 6:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
road games
by billyjoejack on Nov 18, 2007 11:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















