Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

Game Recap: Blazers at Kings

To be honest I'm not sure there's a ton to take from this game team-wise.  Frankly given the personnel and the situation this game wasn't indicative of much.  However out of respect to Sacramento fans we should also say that the same applied on Friday night in the Blazers' victory.  The reason we went into such detail on the team play then was because we saw some things from Portland that we haven't seen in a long time, things which were a revelation despite the non-importance of the game itself.  This was not an implication that the Blazers would do the same things in a regular game against the Kings, just as tonight's performance was not an indication that they would lose by 24 in such a contest.

With that out of the way, a couple of brief team things to note:

--It was encouraging to see that the Blazers came out sharing the ball at the start of the game.  When things broke down they reverted more to one-on-one offense but that's understandable.  You have to try something when the game is going south.  We still got 14 assists on 28 made buckets and that's a good thing.

--We also shot excellent percentages from the three-point arc (44%) and the free throw line (83%).  Those things have been constant throughout the pre-season so there's reason to hope they will remain so during the regular year.

--12 steals is an enormous number.  Taurean Green had 4, Travis Outlaw 3.  Causing Sacramento to turn over the ball 21 times isn't bad either.

Enough of what we can salvage.  These things bit the big banana tonight:

--First and foremost we got a grand total of 16--count them, 16--defensive rebounds tonight.  That's a pretty good day for Chris Wilcox.  As a team 16 rebounds on 38 Sacramento misses is horrible.  They got 16 offensive rebounds themselves.  They rebounded their misses just as well as we did!  That's unheard of.  Sacramento is a weak rebounding team as well.   Nobody who is going to be on this team come Halloween got more than 3 rebounds tonight.

--We may have forced 21 turnovers but we committed 26 ourselves, many on illegal screens.  The execution was sloppy tonight.  Channing Frye had 4 turnovers, Raef LaFrentz 5, and Travis Outlaw a prodigious 7.  None of those guys played more than 26 minutes.

--We only shot 39% overall from the field.  From the get-go we were firing jumpers and not being aggressive getting to the hoop.  I suspect Nate talked to the guys at halftime because they came out trying to drive but it didn't last long.  On a huge number of possessions the ball never went anywhere near the key, just pass-pass-pass around the edge and shoot a jumper.  We'll never win that way.  When we shoot long it needs to be off of penetration.

--We'll talk more about Joel Przybilla in a minute but suffice it to say that he made a huge difference in the interior defense tonight, as evidence by the fact that once he left the game there was none.  And I mean none.  When he was manning the middle all of our help had a backbone.  Without him Sacramento was either open at the rim or open from three all night long.  It was kind of sad to watch.  Our transition defense completely fell apart in the second half as well.  That was perhaps more disappointing than anything because it's mostly a matter of effort.  Even on an off night you should be getting back and covering the rim against early attacks.

--Basically we lost focus somewhere in the second quarter and never got it back.  This shows you the flip side of what can happen with a young team.  When things are going right it snowballs and can look magnificent.  When things fall apart, though, it can disintegrate in a hurry.  It also shows you how valuable our main guys are:  Aldridge, Roy, Przybilla (defensively).  Everybody else keys off of them.  Without them our individual talents don't mesh properly.

Individual Notes:

--Joel had a nice 9 minutes out there before he went to the locker room for stitches and never came back.  He was active, though the near-constant influx of Kings into the lane wasn't doing him any favors foul-wise.  Nobody on this team does what he does (as long as Oden is out).  Don't under-appreciate him.

--Jarrett Jack was one of three guys who kept their heads above water offensively.  Mainly he was a recipient of passes either beyond the arc or on the way to the hoop.  Whenever he had a chance he seemed to can the shot or draw a foul.  10-10 from the free throw line is NICE.  It was a great offensive game for him.  He is definitely at his best when he's scoring confidently and often.

--Martell Webster also shot VERY confidently and hit a ton of shots (for him anyway) off the dribble.  His 3 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal, and a couple nice trips back in transition defense also spoke well of him.  It was another encouraging outing.

--Channing Frye got the chance to play more minutes tonight.  His face-up jumper is solid.  His post moves are good if he doesn't have to put the ball on the floor much.  However he's got nothing in the post when he has to dribble.  He wasn't able to shake his post defenders at all going one-on-one.  At this point it looks like Lamarcus is way better in that department.  Also Channing's defense wasn't that strong.  He's not an interior presence.  He had 18 points but also 4 turnovers and 6 fouls in 28 minutes.  More refining is needed.

--Travis did not put on a good show.  Friday night he was shooting quickly and in the flow of the offense.  Tonight he had a lot of opportunities where he tried to dribble his way to shots all alone.  That's old Travis, and not his best side.  On one memorable play he started on the left side of the court out by the three-point line at a depth around the middle of the key.  When he made his move he was actually angling away from the basket as he dribbled...so he ended up near the free throw line.  Take a ball out to your local court, start on the side, and angle away from the basket as you dribble towards the center of the court.  Tell me what kind of good shot you're going to get doing that.  There's just no way.  As I recall this was one of his 7 turnovers.  In any case there's a big difference between in the flow Travis and forcing it Travis.

--Raef LaFrentz didn't make that much of an impact on the game.  There was one interesting play where he was guarding a guy driving with the ball, the guy elbowed him in the chest, knocking him backwards, and Raef STILL blocked the shot.  That was cool.  Other than that you didn't notice him much, except for his 6 fouls.

--The other point guards were basically blah.  Taurean Green hustled a lot but his 2-10 shooting wasn't good.  I believe Nate when he says Taurean has shooting chops but at the same time when I've seen him in games (Summer League or these two) I haven't seen it so much.  I wonder if it will turn out to be one of those practice phenomena.  Steve Blake wasn't bad but wasn't great.  Sergio also hustled and didn't turn the ball over.  His 3 assists and 2 boards in 18 minutes were good.  Collectively the guards had trouble defending though, and a lot of the transition woes can be laid at their feet.  Not a shining game as a group.

--Let's give Brent Petway and Chris Ellis some props.  They came to play and maybe gave the best effort of anyone.  It's hard to feel like their insertion wasn't a big, old white flag waving but given the fact that they scored more per minute than all but the most prolific Blazers and rebounded more than anybody maybe we should re-assess that.

It's guaranteed this won't be the last game we see like this all year, even with our talent available.  Sometimes the wheels will just fall off.  So be it.  You accept it as part of the growing pains and move on.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

My complaint with Travis:
He is one minded on offense. Too many jumpshots. When he dribbles the ball, he rarely takes it to the hoop, its usually a fairly lateral move to try and create space for his jumper.  Once the defense figures out that he isnt gonna go around you(which only took the kings 1 game to figure out), they can easily contest his pull up jumper.  Sure they probably wont block it, but I dont really like Outlaw taking open jumpers, let alone ones with a hand in his face.  Please show some versatility Outlaw, this is your 5th year. You cant go 2-10 with 0 rebounds and 0 assists, and I wish I didnt have to mention the 7 turnovers.  Outlaw has been the biggest disapointment for me, even when he scored 24 in the last game, I didnt like the way he did it.  Outlaws current style of play will lead to many more of these 2-10 games than the 10-13 games. He needs to kick it up a notch.
RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Oct 22, 2007 1:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i just couldnt
take this seriously as a real game, given how many players we kept out. i still havent seen them on tv (im still into baseball) and until the regular season starts my attention is less than 100%.
ignacio

by ignacio on Oct 22, 2007 2:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It was far from a comprehensive test case
However something "real" it did show us was not to overrate our 4th-10th guys and not to underrate what our tops guys mean to us.  It's easy to get excited about all of these young talents but the reality is they're still longer on promise and potential than anything else.  There will just be times this year where we'll get off track and not be able to get ourselves back on.  That's one of the big differences between younger teams and veterans.  It's not like vets don't lose focus or get in slumps but they have a broad foundation to rely on to carry them through.  Our guys may be able to aspire to the same heights on certain nights but instead of standing on a wide mountaintop they're on a small pedestal.  When they maintain their balance it's great, but they are also easy to knock off.

--Dave

by Dave on Oct 22, 2007 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fortunate
Once again I wasn't able to watch the game on t.v. or listen on the radio.  In this case, I count myself fortunate.  If it was ugly to read about, I can imagine what it was like to watch.

But in fairness to the Blazers, not many teams would have excelled under the circumstances.  They were playing without their two centers (Oden and Joel) and their two best scorers (Roy and LMA).  Even the Spurs wouldn't be too pretty to watch minus Tim Duncan and Uberto (?), along with Parker and Ginobli.  

by hurryup09 on Oct 22, 2007 11:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

At least one thing
that is positive came out of this game. I think Martell is ready to start and will excell in both the half court and running game. That's really nice to see. I think at this point he needs to work on his defense and crashing the boards but I'm starting to have some real hope with Martell.

Travis...well he should come off of our bench until he can come off of someone else's...

Our guards continue to confuse me. Up one night and down the next. JJ1 had a great night but again looked like a small two guard rather then our point guard. Sergio looked ok in the brief time he was in. Taurean had his second straight bad game although he showed effort on the defensive end (4 steals). Blake looked OK but nothing special. If I was KP and Nate I would be horrified at the mess that is the point guard position. I really look forward to the return of Roy as our back court looks very VERY inconsistent thus far.

I didn't get to watch this game so I can't comment on defense much and it would be nice if someone who watched the game could give a player by player break down of defense. This is something that isn't translated well on the radio or in the Box Score.

October, October, October, October, October...... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odin)

by Idog1976 on Oct 22, 2007 12:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It didn't matter so much
individually last night.  Joel was active.  Martell got back a couple times, which was mostly noticeable because that's a change from last year.  Taurean hustled.  But basically the team played a lot of zone and just got their chops busted as a team.  We had zero interior defense once Joel left.  We couldn't stay with the perimeter guys either...picks and passes were both killing us.  It wasn't so much individual shortcomings as poor execution, communication, or whatever contributes to a team clicking defensively.  We didn't have it.

--Dave

by Dave on Oct 22, 2007 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dave
I'm really glad you mentioned Taurean Green's professed shooting prowess.

I, too, was highly skeptical of Nate's account of his range and accuracy after Summer League.

His form, I felt, was awkward and lent itself towards inconsistency.

I'm not surprised whatsoever that we've seen a 2-10 performance, a 4-14 performance, and perhaps one other not-so-lustrous game from the floor on Friday night.

Could this be a case of us "advertising weakness" in an attempt to shop him to other teams, or just wishful thinking on the part of Nate, who clearly loves Taurean's other attributes a great deal?

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Oct 22, 2007 1:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My guess
is that Nate is telling us exactly what he sees.  He wouldn't crow about the shooting ability unless it was real.  However the league is full of guys who can hit them in practice but don't follow through the same way in games. The legends of Shaq's free throw shooting are well-chronicled, for instance.

It's way too early to hazard a guess one way or another though.  Shooting is one of the harder things for rookies to get comfortable doing.  Even if Taurean turns out to be a 45% shooter from the arc his shot could very well look off at first.  It's a way better sign to be good in practice and not as good in games at this point than it would be to be lousy in both.  We need to give him some time.

--Dave

by Dave on Oct 22, 2007 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

just a thought...
I agree the situation is very likely just as Dave describes it. It makes me wonder if Nate is making a statement to the team and especially Sergio.  He might be making sure Sergio knows someone is right behind him. Could it be a motivational technique.
RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Oct 22, 2007 7:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Un_bohemien_small
Is Roy a Good Teammate?
Kpavatar2_small
Just Another Junk In The Wall:  11-18-09
Terryporter_small
Blazers Edge Community Podcast Episode 008
Small
Why is the Blazers’ offense bad this year? Why is the defense so good?
P1010399_small
Photos from the Hawks game, 11/16/2009

Recent FanPosts

Small
Blake: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do
Portland-trail-blazers_small
Individual Observations - Little Mac
Photo__2__small
junkdrawer in case of SO armageddon
Small
Rotation...Oden
Small
Impressive Early Season Blazers Stats
Imported_photos_00004_small
The Blazer Guards
Small
Portland and the summer of Lebron
Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
Tough act to follow junk Nov.19
Small
Nate? Avery? Adelman?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.
FREE GREG ODEN
"It's been good for us," Oden said. "We're going to stick with it. We have...

Recent FanShots

Greg Oden with a Kimbo Slice/Baron Davis beard. What do you think?
Andre Miller is tough
Michael Jordan says "don't retire my number"
Charles Oakley to the Blazers? He says there are talks
Lamarcus: The King Cobra?
Surprising Stats from Basketball-Reference
Oden #5 and Rudy #9 ranked soph espn.com
NYT: The Pick-And-Roll is the NBA's Old Reliable
At this point, what the Blazers want most is rebounding. That was an...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm