Half-Baked Game Recap: Portland 102, Atlanta 89
Here's another game recap attempt just going from the Boxscore. As always, take with a grain of salt.
This looks like it could have been our best game of the pre-season so far in terms of playing winning basketball, even though it probably wasn't as flashy as the Clippers game. We shot well (45.7% from the field), held our opponent to under 40% shooting, made 56% of our three-point attempts, made 92% of our foul shots, outrebounded the opponent, had assists on just more than half our buckets, and stayed out of foul trouble. You'll always have a chance with that kind of lineup.
A couple of things didn't look as good. We gave up 19 offensive rebounds, which is far too many. The most prolific team in the league last year, Cleveland, averaged under 13. We also turned the ball over 17 times which is not a disaster but probably needs to be lower. (Baby steps, I guess.)
A look at the shot chart shows us that only about half of our shots were from free-throw line distance or farther. Also compared to the last couple of games those jumpers were much, much closer in as a whole. That's probably a better plan for us than launching deep.
The points against us appear to be minor while the greater portion of the effort deserves praise. This will be the style of game we have a decent chance of winning in the regular season.
Individual Notes:
--Lamarcus Aldridge came alive again. It was good to see him with only four fouls. It was even better to see him take 18 shots and hit 10. Best of all he also drew 10 free throw attempts and hit 9. He had 3 steals to balance his 4 turnovers. By the way, we should expect to see a reasonable number of turnovers out of Lamarcus this year as he negotiates being a primary option in the offense and receives a lot of defensive pressure. It'll take time to learn what to do with the ball. I don't expect this will be a career-long issue but it's one of the things that we'll have to put up with in the short term.
--Martell had another encouraging game, this time showing a different side of himself. He didn't score 20+, only 12. The boxscore only shows 4 field goal attempts. But he also got to the line 6 times and made all 6. More importantly he had 6 rebounds, 3 assists, and no turnovers. Realistically when Brandon Roy starts playing this will probably be a more common stat line for Martell than the scoring explosions we saw in the first couple of games. But this is a good stat line! This is just what we've been asking: hit your shots, be aggressive, draw fouls, and contribute in other ways when you're not shooting instead of just drifting. If he could keep his average around 15 with these other stats besides I think everybody would be encouraged and floored.
--Travis Outlaw's line was more pedestrian. I'll be watching to see if the game recaps mention him playing good defense or something. Otherwise this seems like a less-than-stellar effort from him following the shot-fest in Denver. Travis and Martell have shared this in common so far: they're different players when they shoot a lot. It looks like Martell is breaking out of that and figuring out how to contribute. Travis needs to also.
--Joel Przybilla notched another double-digit rebounding effort with 12. He also had 4 blocks. He even shot 4 times, scoring 6 points total. It looks like he's ready to play. Also it strikes me that if Greg Oden were tallying these kind of numbers early we'd be plenty happy.
--Channing Frye shot 6-14 and had 6 rebounds and 14 points in 29 minutes. Not bad numbers if you're thinking of a bench player.
--The guards were a mixed bag. Steve Blake had 6 rebounds and 5 assists but also committed an uncharacteristic 4 turnovers. He ended up with 9 points in 33 minutes. Jarrett Jack played 38 minutes and only shot 33%. He scored 13 but also had 6 assists. Taurean Green played 14 minutes and scored 7 on 50% shooting with 2 assists. It was nice to see him have a bounce-back game of sorts. Sergio only got 5 minutes and had 1 assist and 2 points off of 1-3 shooting. I don't know whether the short stint was planned, an afterthought, or he just got yanked for something. I assume he'll get more chances this pre-season though. You can't tell much from 5 minutes.
--Raef LaFrentz got 8 courtesy minutes and tallied a couple points and a rebound.
Overall it looked like Nate subbed like this was a regular season game and not exhibition. Seven players got 24 minutes or more and only three others played...basically an eight-man rotation. One of the group of Jack, Blake, Outlaw, and Webster is going to lose a large portion of those minutes when Roy comes back. I guess part of the reason for pre-season is to figure out which.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
Starting 3 spot.
by myemic23 on Oct 15, 2007 12:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm really impressed
The fact that we didn't give Sergio any time I don't like. Not at all. Jack seems to have done some good at the end, but 33% and still was in for nearly 38 minutes? All of the point guards sound like they had a tough go, why weren't we giving Sergio more time? That really worries me. With the work he seems to have put in on his game in regards to defense and conditioning, plus the time he must have spent to improve his English so much, he seems like he is working really hard to have a place here, and it doesn't seem like we're accommodating him. Furthermore the Blake signing seems very ominous for one of our young points and is really giving me fits since Green looks to be the favored 3rd option right now. Hopefully we get to see more of Serg on Friday and through the course of the season.
One last note on Sergio, despite the fact that he has several nicknames, I really feel strange with calling him any of them. No way will I ever refer to a guy as Spanish chocolate without an explicit or extremely apparent reason, Spanish Magician is too long... oh wait, el mago, I just got that one (thanks babelfish). Mag works for me and seems pretty fitting.
by einman77 on Oct 15, 2007 3:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's intereresting...
I haven't been a big fan of Martell to this point. I think he has been a disappointment, and the coaching staff has obviously been frustrated with him. Some of their comments about Martell's 'uncoachability' were fairly unflattering.
In a way (and yes it's the preseason, and all I've seen are box scores), this last game was more impressive then the other 2 games because he did more then simply score. 6 rebounds, 3 assists, and no turnovers and he was very efficient shooting the ball.
But I think talking about him being the starter is premature. I suppose if Jones remains 'injured' and Travis doesn't show any improvement in conditioning martell might get the start by default. But, after observing Nate for a while, I don't think a preseason will make him forget about the previous 164 regular season games and reward martell with the starting spot. I think he'll want to see if martell can replicate his preseason production in actual games with meaning first. If martell continues to be productive in the regular season, then he may earn the start. And practically speaking, that's the way it should be.
As to Sergio, fairly or unfairly, I think he's got quite a mountain to climb with Nate. Sergio generated a lot of excitement and affection with the fans because he appeared to be good at one thing no other blazer was: speeding up the game and pushing the ball. With the glacial pace the blazers were operating at, sergio's game was like a breath of fresh air. But the 'buzz' it created tended to obscure the fact that while sergio does a couple of things well, he does several other things terribly. Especially play defense.
Porland will depend on their frontline a lot this year, and it will be hamstrung if their big men are in foul trouble all the time because they're reacting to opponent's PG penetration. Sergio allows that constantly. Nate won't tolerate that, and he's made that clear.
I think Sergio supporters will be frustrated this year, especially if green demonstrates an ability to defend opposing PG's.
by moldorf on Oct 15, 2007 7:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Martell
All three games this has been reported and I think that is more important than anything. It reflects confidence and patience. I've been impressed so far.
He played more SF in the Atlanta game where other games he's been more the SG and I think that's why you see those rebound numbers.
In regards to non-coachability... from all accounts you're reporting last years news. This year he's been much more focused on learning.
Again, this is all based off of radio reports and stats, but it does indicate this may be the Webslingers break out year.
by ratbastird on Oct 15, 2007 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why COULDN'T Martell start?
Unless Jones shows he is a much better defender than Martell, ala Ime, than I think Martell's shooting fits in better with the starters than Outlaw's game.
I always pictured Outlaw as a good bench player who is fine with coming off the bench... I'm just not sure if he has the basketball IQ or drive to ever reach his potential but it doesn't mean he can't be a fine player. Coming off the bench as a main option might keep things simpler for him, or better utilize his shoot first mentality.
Webster has been a player I've defended in the past, as I think he can really turn into a great scorer in the NBA, so I might be biased with the joy of him actually playing well for an EPIC three games in a row. But, if Jones isn't a much better defender and Outlaw doesn't clearly improve his baskie-ball playing when not the main scorer, then I'd say ol' Marty Websters is the best fit for the starters.
Unless keeping him as the main guy in the 2nd unit is what Nate feels is best, that is. Perhaps using Jones as the role player he is with the starters and Martell as the "star" of the 2nd unit and a mish-mash of the two squads at the end of games... yeah, that's the ticket!
My main point: No one is entrenched at the 3 spot, so if Martell is playing the best then he should get the 3 spot. Likewise if Outlaw or Jonesie are playing the best. Past history is moot as either the other 3's don't have a past history or a history none more gooder than Martell's.
Side note: Did Outlaw even work on his game alllll off-season?! He says he didn't condition because he didn't wanna get hurt... baloney! I believe I got the same asthma as he has, and if you are doing sportsmanlike endeavors then you gotta stay in shape to keep the asthma more under control... if you ain't in shape physically then the asthmar holds you back even more. Not to mention simple off-season drills to improve your game... did he do anything of the sort? We GOTTA stop letting him hide out in the lazy South of Mississippiissippi and keep him under the watchful gaze of an assistant coach who makes sure he works out and, like, plays basketball. Yeah, it can't be mandatory but if Nate says it'll make him feel good if Outlaw did it then Outlaw would likely do it. The Quick reports and quotes from Outlaw make me think that he hadn't worked out much at all during the offseason... ignoring Jones or Martell and everything about the 3 spot, this kinda bugs me. It's not like he had to stay healthy for a contract, he got a multiyear deal right away. I don't know...
Keep him in the west next offseason.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Oct 15, 2007 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I said...
I also don't have a 'problem' with him starting or playing major minutes. It's time to try and figure out if he's a 'keeper'. I have said before that if you were to design a prototype of a perfect SF for the blazer's roster (especially after adding oden), and compare it to the projection of martell's "potential", the prototype and the projection would be an almost perfect match. I just have had little confidence that martell would ever reach that potential.
But I wasn't really saying martell shouldn't start. I was saying that the coaching staff had too much history with martell's stubborness and inefficiency to reward him with the start after 3 good games in the preseason. Or seven good games for that matter.
It's encouraging that it appears he may actually have turned a major corner, but the real test of that will be regular season games. That's where martell need to show his improvement. If he's truly better then Jones of Outlaw, he'll prove it soon enough.
by moldorf on Oct 15, 2007 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
As far as your comments regarding Martell and the starting spot, I would like to agree with you, as I am also a big fan of Webster and am overjoyed with his recent progress.
The catch: Jones is a MUCH better defender than Martell. Anytime you hear reports that one player excels at defending the perimeter while another is terrible at it, you can rest assured that there's a significant discrepancy.
I'll keep an open mind as I get the opportunity to actually WATCH the new Web, and Jones, but until I see differently, I'm going with the proven defender to prevent from being torched at the start of a game against teams with potent scoring capability from the wing.
But I can totally see where you're coming from, and completely agree with your comments on Trout (or is it Flounder?).
by broggerboy19 on Oct 15, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like we did this ...
Also ... Dave, you mentioned we outrebounded them. Rebounds look pretty even, so did you just mean that we rebounded well?
by bfan on Oct 15, 2007 7:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Change that to "stayed with them in rebounds".
--Dave
by Dave on Oct 15, 2007 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers DID outrebound them
by jamon51 on Oct 15, 2007 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
PG play too many 2-guard Minutes
by vcubed on Oct 15, 2007 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















