Game 27 Preview: Portland Trail Blazers vs. New Orleans Hornets
Game Time: 5:00 Pacific TV: CSNNW
Update: The New Orleans Hornets sent a release on Friday saying that guard Jarrett Jack with not play in Friday night's game due to a re-aggravation of a bruised left knee. He is expected out "at least a week." -- Ben
-------------------------------------
The New Orleans Hornets are bad. They're really bad. Have you ever walked in your house after being outside in the fresh air and gotten a whiff of some sickly-sweet smell wafting from the kitchen? Have you ever checked the garbage, the cupboards, the back of the fridge without being able to identify the source? Have you ever dug persistently, certain something was off, until finally in the back of the fruit and veggie drawer you found some unidentifiable bag of green, gooey, stuff from which this foul smell was emanating? Have you ever then opened that bag and chugged its contents? Then you, my friend, have no idea how bad the New Orleans Hornets are. They are the forgotten baggie of formerly-organic produce raising a stench from the bottom of the NBA's fruit drawer. And you get to eat them tonight.
Do you think I'm exaggerating? These guys are on a losing streak that's lasted the whole season. And it's not getting better. They have won 4 times in 26 games. Two of those wins came in their first two outings. That means they're 2-22 since. The Orlando Magic and Denver Nuggets did the honors, Orlando by scoring 67 points (still trying to figure out how they did that on a night when Dwight Howard scored 28) and the Nuggets by scoring 81. In fact the Hornets have not beaten a team that has scored more than 84 points on them. It's Lawler's Law modified: First to 85 wins. Unless it's the Hornets. Then the other team wins anyway.
To be fair the Hornets have been without scoring guard Eric Gordon for much of the season, but come on...is this guy Kobe? Is he LeBron? That's what you'd need to turn this team around. They score like a sports blogger at a Victoria's Secret show. For most teams 87 points is a disastrous night. That's their average. The only guys averaging good percentages from the field are the guys who don't shoot much. They don't have a single reliable three-point shooter among them. Even distance-wizard Marco Belinelli has lost his touch. They're horrible on the break. It's inside scoring or nothing for them. Pack the paint , secure the rebound, and profit. There's no "?????" line needed. It's just that easy.
On defense the story is slightly better. They can guard the paint. They allow a low three-point percentage. They rebound well defensively. Their big issues are getting back on defense and not helping out. They have ability defensively but lack confidence and cohesion. If you just go one-on-one against them all night they'll look good. Pass the ball a couple times and watch what happens. Plus remember that the bar is 85-88 points instead of the 100 you'd feel comfortable with against most defenses. No matter how well you defend in this league you're going to have a hard time holding opponents that low.
With Gordon out Jarrett Jack remains the leading scorer for the Hornets at 15 per game. Carl Landry and Trevor Ariza hover around 11 per. Everybody else--Emeka Okafor, Kaman, Belinelli, and a bunch of people you ain't never heard of--scores in single digits. You're not watching this game to see if your team wins. You're watching this game searching for spare parts to plug into the Trade Machine. At this point the Hornets are a league-owned salvage yard. Grab a distributor cap and a back-up center. Don't be stupid enough to get bit by the dog while browsing.
No matter who is sick, no matter how bummed people are about the last two games, no matter what coaching schemes are employed or how minutes are distributed, even if it is on the road, the Blazers should win this game. The goal in this situation is to play with enough energy early on that you can rest your starters in anticipation of the Dallas game tomorrow.
Inevitably in the comment section someone will mention that this type of game is a trap. If it is, go ahead! Spring it! What are you going to do, give the Blazers a mildly nasty rug burn? Put a slight noogie indentation in the old hairdo? Maybe it's true that any team can win on a given night, but this ought to be a night where the win isn't given. And being given it is the only way the Hornets are going to walk out of that arena with a "W".
At The Hive will no doubt compare the team to a slightly less moldy variety of vegetable.
Your Jersey Contest form for the evening.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
we need a easy game to get our synergy back
We have good players, but they are all going in different directions and not moving as a unit. We need a game that we can actually work on action instead of reaction.
hg
we have good player(s)
luckily batum saves aldridge from that word being a singular.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
Could be indeed
If a tree falls in the forest but it only scored 11 points per game, does it matter?
But yes, he’s out. As is Gordon still. Kaman is back.
—Dave
by Dave on Feb 9, 2012 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
lol
Since I’m a robot that can’t understand humor, I’ll note that while the Blazers should certainly have their way with the Hornets Landry or no Landry, he’s still a good player that would alter the probabilities at least a little bit were he playing, and with what we’ve seen from the Blazers on the road, its probably a good thing he’s out.
by jksnake99 on Feb 10, 2012 12:04 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I didn’t know sports writers had it so rough.
by Jonathan Wright on Feb 9, 2012 10:37 PM PST up reply actions
sports writers don't
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 10, 2012 9:29 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
but only because sports writers are shallow and narcissistic
…seeing the game only skin deep and never committing to a single viewpoint.
Bloggers, on the other hand, are the genuine article – committed, loyal – and both capable and willing to look below the surface to develop meaningful analysis.
Right, Dave?
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 10, 2012 9:50 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I hope we lose
I am tired of beating really bad teams. I want something that will give the blazers system shock
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
also if no one has seen it Will Ferrell did the player introduction
for the hornets during their 80s night… its pretty silly stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zv3bYWuUUng
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
by tylercomp on Feb 9, 2012 11:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm glad someone posted this
I really enjoyed these
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
I'm tired of losing to poor teams
We need to play to our strength and not down to theirs. But then again is playing a 5 minute game good enough to beat a bad team LOL?
hg
if we lose this one the whole fan base comes completely unglued
On the bright side, it should be entertaining with either result.
Nate may show to much love to Monty and leave his rookies in the game too long
Or Heaven forbid, actually put his rookies in the game for more then 5 minutes.
hg
when the bench rotation sucks as bad as it does, it makes it hard to take requests for players out of the top 8 seriously.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
well said lol
we see EWill and Nolan in actual game time and the rest in garbage time. Considering our roster I’m not sure how much more we could possibly ask for. We’re also seeing a 9 man regular rotation.
I’m tempted to count Felton with the deep reserves but that would probably be mean.
In his playing time, Williams has sucked less than any starter except Aldridge
Elliot currently has the second highest PER on the team (Batum territory).
It doesn’t mean much other than to tell us we need to learn more – but he hasn’t sucked.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 10, 2012 9:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Lets not be quite so hasty
While the Hornets have been terrible this year, they’ve had some decent showings as of late. In their past 12 games, they may only be 1-11, but 4 of those losses have been by 2 points.
2 point loss to Dallas
2 point loss to Spurs
2 point loss @Houston
2 point loss @Detroit
Those are respectable showings…. And if I remember right, our record isn’t all that great in tight games.
Lets not count this in the bag quite yet Dave… Just saying…
On the topic of point differential, New Orleans' expected win-loss record is 7-19. That's 3 wins higher ...
than its actual 4-22 record. This isn’t like this month’s earlier game against Charlotte, which is as bad as — if not worse than — its record indicates. If Portland shows up sluggish or all out of sorts tonight, the Hornets could steal this game.
"I Am Mine"
And we actually lost to 3 of those teams, as well........
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
This is a trap game.
I mean it’s common sense. The last time New Orleans won the game was on a Friday, and it was a home game. Friday Jan 27th New Orleans beat Orlando 93-67, the Magic fell for the Friday night trap in Norlans, the Blazers will be the next.
Gerald Wallace goes for sub-double digits scoring. Wesley Mathews goes 1-5 downtown and shoots under 35 percent on the road again. New Orleans wins as LaMarcus Celebrates his first All-star appearance late into the night tonight and shows up tired once again. Hornets sting the Blazers with a 7 point win.
would be more of a trap game if we were coming off wins
not two home losses
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Feb 10, 2012 10:31 AM PST up reply actions
Seems like every game of late,
Is a so called “Trap Game”
The Chris Paul trade ruined the Hornets. Talk about a Buzz-Kill!
If the Blazers lose this one it’s going to sting!
The only way I see that happening is if the Hornets come out with some swarming defense!
by remember-robert-pack? on Feb 10, 2012 12:22 AM PST reply actions
Oy vey
Wanted to use a Jewish saying so you didn’t think I was a Wasp…
by BlazersMakr on Feb 10, 2012 12:53 AM PST up reply actions
I remember Robert pack!
I even had that t shirt “pack man, catch him if you can”….good times.
by blazerbacker on Feb 10, 2012 2:57 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
And the Blazers are wearing their fly paper uniforms that gets hornets stuck to them
And LMA can’t get breathing room. Of course he may have his head in the Stars LOL.
hg
We're really only a couple games out of top 4 still
Basketball in general apparently sucks this season. The Western conference only has 4 teams below .500 and the shortened season means we get stuck with games against more competitive teams and less gimmies than Eastern conference teams.
We’re also stuck in what’s probably the toughest division in the NBA. If these guys pull it together and make the playoffs they will have earned it.
Denver and OKC went down to Golden State and the Kings tonight. We suck worse then both of those teams because of an apparently incompetent back court but we can still probably catch Denver.
No real easy stretches left this month unfortunately. This team has already wasted some opportunities for going on decent runs.
It appears to me that the easy part of the schedule is what got us in trouble.
Like they thought they could coast and pick up easy games.
hg
Maybe some tough games will do us good then
It certainly did last year after we derailed in similar fashion. Last year we had Dre though and the guards played better. Guess we’ll see.
Wait that means OKC should blow it up right?
They have lost to Washington AND the Kings now, when we lost to the Kings this forum made it feel like the apocalypse was coming.
It's making me a bit sad that I don't even want to watch this team play anymore. This is one of those games where if
we win it really doesn’t prove anything. It will just give fans a false hope that this team is going anywhere. They need to make a trade.
same here
even if they blow NO out by 40 it’s not really impressive and it doesn’t tell us whether they mail the next game in or not.
Yeah, that reminds me. If we win by 40 and lose the next game, I guarantee Mike Barrett uses the emotional let down excuse.
by BRoyInThe4th on Feb 10, 2012 2:04 AM PST up reply actions
There is many of emotional let down or emotionally exhausting games.
I’m a bowler, or try to be; I have seen players bowl 300 games and couldn’t get a strike in the next game.
When you play a game like we played against OKC there is bound to be a let down; well maybe not that much of a let down, but I don’t think Houston is that bad of a team.
hg
we're getting let downs after every win
and apparently every morale victory (OKC)
true. i'm going to skip watching the game to go to happy hour
i will make plans to watch the dallas game though. so i’m not sure if it’s solely my thoughts on the blazers, or i’m also factoring in the entertainment level of the opponent.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
"i'm going to skip watching the game to go to happy hour"
I’d suggest something more potent than alcohol. Not like you have anything to lose.
"I Am Mine"
i am going to eat slow cooked meat.
hopefully there will be mole as well.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Feb 10, 2012 10:57 AM PST up reply actions
"Inevitably in the comment section"
It’s a TRAP! Trap, trap, trap!
Sure The Blazers should win this one. But it’s impossible to tell where this team is right now. The Blazers seem to have found a way to turn nasty rug burns into deep and fatal cuts.
I suggest we temporarily replace Blaze The Trail Cat with Admiral Ackbar.
Is this team playing well enough NOT to worry at least a little about any game?
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
I picked the Blazers in a blow out...
in spite of their demonstrated ability to lose to virtually anyone on any given night.
BTW, I haven’t heard, is Nate still the coach? Just asking…
Huge Trap Game!
Just kiddin. Finally, a game during which I can relax and enjoy a sure Blazer victory! Ahhhh
Thanks, Dave!
These previews, and your jersey-contest, are the best thing online about the Blazers I have seen. Much appreciated. Even the worst matchups become entertaining, and offer another fun contest. Well Done.
We need to beat them before we call them a bad team.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
So a teamhas to lose to the Blazers to be a bad team?
Oh, how far the mighty have fallen.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 10, 2012 9:53 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
at least we're relevant
in a backwards sort of way.
FYI--Jarret Jack will not play
Greivis Vasques will start. Which will make him the ‘Blazer Killer’ of the night.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Careful Dave. The last time you said a team was really bad (SAC) they beat us.
"It feels good to give the fans Taco Bell."
- Luke Babbitt, 1/23/2012
Yup
Not my fault though. That didn’t make them not bad.
If we lose tonight I’ll make sure the Wizards and Nets get previewed like they were the Thunder!
—Dave
Trap Game...
if the blazers cant win this one….FIRE NATE!
nice one dave
the way the blazers shoot the ball on the road, my gut tells me this game will be reminiscent of the late season game last year when the blazers eked out a win over the spurs d-league team playing without Parker, ginobli, and Duncan.

by 


































