Game 24 Preview: Denver Nuggets vs. Portland Trail Blazers
Game Time: 7:00 p.m. TV: KGW
Update: Denver Nuggets C Timofey Mozgov will not travel with the team to Portland for Saturday night's game, according to Benjamin Hochman of the Denver Post. He suffered a fairly brutal ankle sprain (video here) during a Friday night game against the Los Angeles Lakers. -- Ben
Original Post: Several times this season we've talked about games that are "tests", barometers of how the Trail Blazers are doing and what kind of challenges they're ready to overcome. Portland has passed some, failed others, come out about in between. Let's hope they learned something because school is out. The next two games aren't tests. This is real life. Denver and Oklahoma City come into town in succession. Thought nothing permanent is decided with the season 1/3 of the way through these games will not only impact standings and tiebreakers, they're a must if the Blazers want to make any kind of statement that they're ready to challenge for the top two spots in the division. And of the two, tonight's game is the more critical. Barring a serious injury it's unlikely Oklahoma City will be caught. But the Nuggets are a reachable target for the Blazers. Unless they want Denver strutting around for the rest of the season like the Kings of the Walk the Blazers need to send a message tonight. Losing on the road to a team like the Nuggets isn't the end of the world. Drop a game like this at home and you might as well step aside and escort them to their seats in the row ahead of you. Get them some Perrier and canapes while you're at it.
A win won't be easy either. Chronically underrated by most before the season started, Denver has leaped out to a 15-8 record, 8-4 on the road. Only losing 3 of their last 4 to the Clippers, Grizzlies, and Lakers has dimmed their early season success. Those three teams are all good, not great...or at least not consistently. Portland could be in that category as well but they need the "W" to show it.
The last time these two teams met was the third game of Portland's season. The Blazers overcame 25 turnovers and 13 points apiece from LaMarcus Aldridge and Gerald Wallace through tough interior defense and some amazing shooting by Wesley Matthews, Raymond Felton, AND Jamal Crawford. Sadly that was the ONLY time those last ten words have been uttered this season. It's pretty clear the Blazers will need an alternative way of winning tonight.
Since we've seen them last the Nuggets have proceeded to blow away the league in any number of offensive categories. They create more possessions than any other team in the league, so factor that into these stats. But they lead the league in fast break points per game, points in the paint per game, free throw attempts per game, points per game, offensive efficiency, and are second by a smidge to Miami in shooting percentage. They're just average when shooting the three-pointer. That's the only stat directly related to scoring in which they're less than superb. They commit plenty of turnovers, befitting their style of play. They're also poor offensive rebounders but then who needs offensive rebounds when...
A. Most of your shots go in, and...
B. Even if you miss you'll just get another one in a second.
On the other end of the court they rebound well, force turnovers, and do a really good job getting back on the break considering how many fast points they score. Their Achilles Heel is points in the paint, where they are liberal. They don't block shots and their big guys are either a little old or a little slow. They allow good percentages to their opponents from the field and the arc but they don't foul much.
The Nuggets sport three truly dangerous (as opposed to consistent) players in their starting lineup: point guard Ty Lawson, small forward Danilo Gallinari, and power forward Nene. The Brazilian is the most developed of the bunch. He shoots 52% and every once in a while pops off for the double-digit point or rebound game. If you don't push him around he'll push you. Then you're in for a long night. Lawson has quietly turned into a fine point guard. He's as deadly on the break as always and he still sports a fine, though not quite spectacular, shooting percentage at 47%. He's not a great three-point guy but his passing is good and his defense has improved. Gallinari's three-point shot has suffered as he's shot more of them but his overall percentage is still fine and he's got ten 20+ point efforts under his belt this season.
Around these three pillars the Nuggets sport a variety of veterans with specialties. Starting shooting guard Arron Afflalo can shoot the three. Power forward Al Harrington is shooting incredibly well and logging his best season in years. Point guard Andre Miller provides stability and wisdom off the bench Oh...and more assists per game than Lawson. Guard Rudy Fernandez is producing at roughly the same rate he did in Portland, he's just more efficient. His field goal percentage with the Nuggets is approaching 47% instead of the 37% he left the Blazers with. Centers Timofey Mozgov (one of the few true youngsters in the rotation) and Chris Andersen can rebound and make the most of their offensive opportunities. Corey Brewer is a defender with a three-point shot. All of these guys are playing decent minutes and all of them seem to have found a near-optimal performance point.
Besides the usual energy, the critical requirement of getting back on defense (a weak spot in Portland's armor), and the obvious hope of taking advantage of Denver turnovers to run, the Blazers will probably need a concerted, sustained inside attack to keep up in this game. They have to hit Denver in their soft spot. Both Mozgov and Lawson are dealing with ankle injuries. Guys like Felton, LaMarcus Aldridge, even Gerald Wallace need to get inside with regularity and make the Nuggets pay. If the Blazers shoot jumpers they better hit jumpers. That said, they will need to hit a few to keep Denver from simply planting 5 of 10 defending feet in the key and waiting for Portland to enter.
Look three places for your barometers tonight: fast break points, points in the paint, and free throws. Unless we get another weird game between these two teams, the Blazers will need to keep even in 2 of the 3 at minimum to have a chance. Portland can keep pace with the Denver attack if they're getting enough easy points. I don't see any way the Blazers jump shoot or one-on-one their way to victory tonight though. There just aren't enough points on the floor to overcome Denver's team offense that way.
Also look for the physical battle at both forward spots. The power forward battle could be interesting, as either team might well use their center to guard the opposing four. Camby and Aldridge will need to match Nene's physicality since you know that Nene, Andersen, and Mozgov are going to try and bump Aldridge into his discomfort zone. Gallinari will do no such thing with Gerald Wallace but Wallace will need to press his physical advantage, turning Danilo black and blue and making him prefer getting off the floor to putting the ball on it. If the Blazers fail to respond to either physical challenge they're going to lose their edge.
Read the Denver assessment at Denver Stiffs.
Tonight's Jersey Contest form.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
96 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mozgov was injured.
And heres to lamarcus getting 40 points tomorrow!
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Feb 3, 2012 11:42 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Although Mozgov doesn't really get a lot of minutes
So he wouldn’t have been too much trouble but now there will be a lot of Nene, Koufos, Harrington and the Birdman (who hasn’t played the last few games so will have fresh legs) to try and guard LA. LA should be fine though!
I think that may be a little confusing. Does he frequent the malls? : )
#52--------I believe in Greg Oden
probably, but in my head it plays out like so...
Mark Mason: Laaaaaamarcus Alllldridge
Crowd: MVP, MVP, MVP (just three)
repeat sequence as necessary.
Things never work out as nicely as I dream it though :)
hahaha what is Jabbar saying?
(1) Nobody has a good post game anymore.
(2) Except LaMarcus Aldridge.
(3) I don’t watch basketball.
i keep dancing on my own.
by atomiccafe on Feb 4, 2012 7:53 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Kareem is a strange, bitter man
But I appreciate his take on LMA. He knows a thing or two about NBA-centers……If those old-time centers played today, they would Not dominate. They would also be shackled by the new rules. If Howard played back in the day, he would play be the old rules. He’s plenty big and strong to play that way.
it was always odd that shaq refused jabbar's help
that really sat badly with jabbar. always wondered how good shaq could have been if he had something other than a power game. jabbar had to be the most versatile big man ever with an incredibly varied game.
in another era a lot of shaq’s backing into defenders that had position and knocking them away would have been called offensive fouls.
Not to worry. Denver's 3rd game in 3 nights, first and third on the road.
And their 4th game in 5 nights, with 3 on the road.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 4, 2012 12:08 AM PST reply actions
No, then you worry!
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 4, 2012 1:27 AM PST up reply actions
He'll be gone sooner or later...
but tomorrow if he loses tonight. Well, one can dream, can’t one….
FIRE NATE NOW, PLEASE!
I don't really agree but
you aren’t alone in the league. Apparently the folks over at Denver Stiffs hate George Karl.
http://www.denverstiffs.com/2012/2/1/2763260/fire-george-karl-please
"Luke is our go-to Chalupa man," Matthews said. "Designated."
I think every pro team website has one of those posts filled with plenty of agreement.
Except maybe the Spurs and the Patriots.
It’s the nature of fandom.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
I would say its the nature of
ignorance, more then fandom.
Don't say that
Don’t say that
When you say not to worry that is a green light for Portland to try to cruise. Portland needs to worry plus they need to play with intensity all night with many fresh legs coming into the game, even in short rotation and more frequent. THIS IS MY NEW KEY TO THIS GAME. KEEP THE BALL AND PLAYER MOVEMENT FAST AND DON’T LET DENVER BREATHE EASY. Well that sounds good on paper.
It was said in the last blog, in the game against Sac, that we should not let other teams dictate the game to exploit our weakness; pondering on that statement, I realize that is the biggest downfall of Portland. At home they can get the energy and Refs bias, but on the road, they start sucking wind and let the other team get back set up their D and force us into a jump shooting team. That is not our strength of course, so we have to use more personal to keep the fresh legs pushing the tempo since our starters can’t keep the tempo up for 48 minutes, .We are what we are, we all criticize our team for letting off the pedal, but at this moment they can’t keep it going for forty-eight minutes. So instead of crying for what they don’t do or can’t do, I think it is time for Nate to change his rotation to suit the players, not running his starters in the ground. At home we don’t play fast and good for 48 minutes either, but we get a big enough cushion that we can pick our spots to Charge.
Nevertheless, our biggest challenge is over-all rebounding. To play our game we have to get our share of the rebounds; whether that be by hustle or blocking out. When we get in trouble is when Camby is out and they push Aldridge off the blocks. And Thomas gets out hustled for the rebounds, plus he is a high post center.
I honestly think we should use LMA and Rhino in the game together, let the Rhino do the low post and the bumping and grinding and let LMA do the high post and pick and pop to keep the middle open for the Rhino.
All this sounds good to me, whether it can be done or not or if we have a bench deep enough to keep in fresh legs, I don’t know. Regardless we need to try something different and not depend on the other team being worn out, or our home court advantage.
hg
hg
by BBK on Feb 4, 2012 5:00 AM PST up reply actions
I like your thinking! Maybe we can get you a spot on the coaching bench.
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
I think common sense goes a long way in life, and being successful!
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
I thank you for the props
I am not so sure it is common sense, more to do with wisdom due to being 71. Many can figure out that common sense tells you for two and a half years they have been swarming LMA and for 2 and a half years we respond the same way by missing our jumpers. It is time to try something else.
Part of my analysis comes from my dream of LMA and Greg playing high and low post, the opponents would have to stay out on LMA or he would destroy them like he did Sac before they started doubling him. Rhino with his back down ability in the low post is the closest thing to Greg that I have seen. And I like that.
hg
"If the BLAZERS fail to respond to either physical challenge they're going to lose their EDGE"
I see what you did there Dave…
From what I read, he will miss tonight's game
Then be game to game. That may have changed though.
hg
by BBK on Feb 4, 2012 5:02 AM PST up reply actions
I doubt it will be that long. I bet we could see him as soon as Monday for OKC
"Luke is our go-to Chalupa man," Matthews said. "Designated."
Thats great news!!!!
So glad my gut feeling was wrong…..BATUMSHAKALAKA!!!!!
by OfficerCosta on Feb 4, 2012 12:33 PM PST up reply actions
Why's that?
Despite being as negative as I am, I’d still give Portland a 60% chance of winning tonight. At home versus a travel-weary opponent, the odds are in Portland’s favor. Yet, whether they capitalize on that or not remains to be seen, but we shall see this evening.
"I Am Mine"
by AK1984 on Feb 4, 2012 4:40 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with Ignacio
We play much better when we are the underdog and know we have to keep focused the whole game. How many games have we lost when we were supposed to be the superior team on the road? We beat OKC as underdogs, we beat NOH because we had something to prove, and I don’t remember Toronto, maybe because we were due to win one as a superior team.
hg
by BBK on Feb 4, 2012 5:07 AM PST up reply actions
I bet that dude from Sac was hoping that GW wore deodorant.
I didn’t know if he was knocked coo coo or got to much armpit in the nostrils LMAO.
hg
I hate games like this because mentally it feels like Portland has to hurry up and win just to make up for the game they blew vs
the Kings. That’s extra pressure. It’s the gambling equivalent of trying to win back your losses.
at least they're good at it
WLWLWWLWLWL that’s crazy. By the pattern we should beat Denver and OKC then lose to Houston again.
decent preview
I would say you’re way off on Gallinari. Gallinari hasn’t been a very soft player at all since the trade, even though he’s a bit slow laterally he’s good at using his length to stay in front of opponents and contest their shots on defense. He has the potential to frustrate Wallace by playing off him and forcing him to shoot jumpers, so Gerald will have to stay aggressive
The reputation as a guy who mostly shoots three pointers for his offense is also pretty far off since he does most of his work at the free throw line and on drives. He is much better than anyone on the Blazers at drawing contact on drives (6.0 FTA, 12.5 FGAs per 36, compare to LA 5.5 FTAs 18.2 FGAs).
i keep dancing on my own.
I guess, Wallace is really tough when he’s got his head in the game, which has been about 1/3 of the time this season.
i keep dancing on my own.
Wallace is always tough
…and powerful. It’s tough + touch that he could use. Sink a couple of them 2-footers.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Feb 4, 2012 12:07 PM PST up reply actions
or take some more
his biggest problem this year is a 3 point drop in usage rate with no efficiency increase.
i keep dancing on my own.
but really
it’s true that Wallace is a tough guy, but it’s not like he’s been scaring opposing wings this year. Iguodala, Kobe, Hedo Turkoglu, J-Rich, Danny Green, Mini K-Mart, Chase Buddinger, and John Salmons have all had good games against the Blazers. So whatever our toughness advantage is doing there, it’s not producing exceptional results in terms of stopping people on a consistent basis.
i keep dancing on my own.
Blazers win by 10+
That’s just how this season will go…..lose games you have no business losing then get fired up and win games as the underdog.
idk
if the Blazers want to make any kind of statement that they’re ready to challenge for the top two spots in the division
they should stop dropping road games to the dregs of the NBA.
Maybe we are one of the Dregs of the NBA
That is what we were tagged as at the beginning of the season. I don’t believe that of course, but at this point, I am not sure what we are.
As we improve other teams improve, Watch out for Sac, we just gave them a dose of confident, along with SAS, LAL and others.
hg
by BBK on Feb 4, 2012 9:29 AM PST up reply actions
Is George Carl Available?
I’m pretty sure the difference between Denver’s record and Portland’s is the Difference between Carl and McMillan.
by DannyYoung on Feb 4, 2012 9:42 AM PST via mobile reply actions
He sure was hot last night!
LOL. He tried to join Harrington’s 3PT party but apparently was turned away at the door. Hopefully he chokes as bad tonight.
2 PTS/1 REB in 20:53 MIN
And see my post a little higher up regarding how the folks over at Denver Stiffs feel about George Karl. I think they would entertain a trade.
"Luke is our go-to Chalupa man," Matthews said. "Designated."
Rudy's actually been doing pretty well for them
Once he got used to his teammates … not sure what happened last night. The night before he was 4 out of 6 with 2 three pointers.
George Carl is one hundred percent available right now.
Well, not one hundred percent. Carl would have to ask his manager at Home Depot for time off.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
Dave, If Portland is really weak as a kitten, how have they won Any games?
Your previews are pretty much the only ones I read regularly. You do a tremendous job, Sir… I do, however, have the one bone to pick: You are the anti-optimist, ’How’s Portland gonna win This? They Suck!‘, Glass-half-empty guy. It’s really the only thing I don’t like about your writing. Portland’s pretty good, my man…….This game is very scary, even at home. I think the Blazers can and will win it. Get em Boys! Overpower the Nugs in the paint, and win a very important game, one you really need. This will be Aldridge’s night, I think. He’ll be ready to dominate some Nugs. Huge Game Tonight! I cannot frikkin Wait!
Cause they have no consistency
They can win, but it happens when things align for them. For every great game there are just as many complete let downs. It confuses me cause this one of those traits of a young team and I thought that meant young as in mostly non veteran. Turns out young team could just be new players to the team. Gerald Wallace 1.5yrs, Jamal Crawford, Ray Felton, Kurt Thomas, Craig Smith <0.5yrs as new Veterans then there’s Luke Babbit, Armon Johnson, Chris Johnson & Elliot Williams who all have 1 season or less and barely any actual playing time. That leaves Camby, Aldridge, Batum & Matthews as your returning core… Mathews is only 2 seasons and plays inconsistently as is Batum with 3 seasons though. Aldridge and Camby are really the only two who seem to be consistent.
So how do they win games?
you make a good point
This team just needs time to “gel” and get use to each other. I’m hoping they catch fire at the right time and enter the playoffs with a hot streak.
by OfficerCosta on Feb 4, 2012 10:09 AM PST up reply actions
We have won games because like the teams that beat us
We were over-looked as a pretender not a contender, and teams let their guard down. Not that we can’t fly under the radar anymore, we have to lace up the sneakers better and learn to play real BB. That is why we are soft. We have been resting on our laurels.
Actually, I agree with you, but Portland have got to grab their ankles and yank their collective heads out and start playing BB.
hg
Karl annoys me
I remember watching his Sonics foul every 2 seconds. He acknowledged that the refs couldn’t or wouldn’t call Every foul, especially when you constantly are fouling. The league had to change rules to combat George Karl’s Evil Genius. I hated that guy!…In today’s tamer game, where defense is frowned upon, Karl is forced to rely upon offense. His team leads the league in several key offensive categories…..I gueass what I’m trying to say, is, Yeah, let’s get George Karl! I like Nate, but, see ya Nate. Big Karl >Lil Nate. I’ll just stop
Scoring is the only stat that matters.
Other stats are used to explain why you lost
I predict the team with the most points at the end of the game
will be declared the winner of that game.
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
I made that statement last year and was asked if I meant at the beginning of the game or the last of the game
So beware of your bold statement LOL.
hg
That is the essence of the game -- whoever scores more wins the game.
Rebounds don’t matter, fouls don’t matter, assists don’t matter, efficiency doesn’t matter, turnovers don’t matter, etc.
We’re never going to win jack until we start SCORING MORE POINTS than the other team. No predictions are necessary, it’s simply a fact. To further understand the concept, compare the Charlotte game to the Sacramento game.
Question????????
Does anybody feel that Portland is coasting through the first half of the season to not be worn out at the end like the last 3 years. If I didn’t know better with their Dr Jekyll and Mr Hide act I would surely think so.
hg
I'm not sure if the Blazers are
but as a fan I’m 100% certain I’m coasting.
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
I am coasting in the respect that I am not expecting the Blazers to win
any certain games. That way it is not as hard to deal win we loose games I thought we should have won.
BBK In response to your question it feels like the team is waiting for something. Maybe a trade, or Oden to return to the line up, but it does feel like they are not giving it all / playing to their full potential. My other thought it that playing time & rotations may be the issues. I guess we just have to wait & see (and I am hoping to see a good game & big win for us tonight).
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
During a key stretch in the fourth quarter of yesterday's loss to the L*kers
Karl went with this three-guard lineup:
Lawson
Andre Miller
Rudy Fernandez
Al Harrington
Nene
Andre was guarding Kobe, bodying him on the post, while all 175 pounds of Rudy shadowed all 270 pounds of Artest.
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
I think we'll get the W tonight
They just had two games (one in LA and then back in Denver and then here … not sure why the NBA couldn’t swing playing the Clips and Lakers in LA rather than flying back and forth but whatever) and had a tough loss last night. However, their bench is much stronger than ours right now (Harrington, Dre, Rudy) and Brewer missed the Clipper game and then didn’t play much last night so he’ll be fresh.
However, the Blazers are playing in the Rose Garden and had a day off to think about the 3rd quarter meltdown from the Kings game so will come out swinging, so to speak. At least I hope so. I do hope that Dre and Rudy have good games and would like to see a good fight from both teams … blowouts are fun (you know, for the team winning) but not very exciting and I’d like to see the Blazers excel under pressure instead of folding. That’s getting old …
When Denver gets up by 20 or 30........................
I’d like to see Dre make a steal and throw a lob to LA, just for the hell of it.
We must endeavor to persevere.
I would love to have dre on our bench
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
kind of like ole (not old) reliable
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
Well, Denver is a good team so we have a chance of winning
If we were playing the WA Wizards, however, I’d be worried
So true!!!!!!!
"Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes, but no plans."
Another Oden procedure?!
Just read that he had another knee-job on friday. I wonder if he’ll ever play again…
From Tokito
Traffic/parking alert: If you’re going to #Blazers game tonight, Winterhawks also play at MC at 7 p.m.
Road Woes...and
I don’t understand why Nate doesn’t call timeouts when his team stops going inside, is a step slow on defense, and starts going one on one, which is not how they are getting their leads. Call a time out, explain that what they are doing is not how they were being successful, and, if they continue to do the same, just call another time out…Better to use time outs to win than to keep them in the bank for some future need. Yank players who aren’t following the plan and rag on them. Nate has a good game plan and when the players execute, they look great. All that being said, it looks like they MAY be close to getting over this road play hump…They looked really good in the first half at Sacramento. As a side note, if Crash’s numbers were the same on the road as they are at home, this team would have maybe the best record in the NBA. Another side note, Nic has ice in his veins…It’s not that his game doesn’t have ups and downs, but 1st quarter or 4th, he’s the same.
Under different circumstances we'd probably be assured of a loss tonight.
But the Nuggets’ third game in three nights after a down-to-the-wire loss last night in which nobody got rest, and then flying directly to Portland after the game…
I think the ’Zers squeak this one out.
Blazers should win by 15 points plus
Good as Denver is, they are coming into the game tired and rattled, having dropped three of the last four, two of those at home.
Denver’s newly extended star is struggling with this shot, clearly has mental toughness issues and George Karl’s zeal for playing small and fast means he lets opposing teams gobble up rebounds and score plenty of second-chance points.
Not to mention teams are figuring out real quick that the key to stopping Denver is to convert them into a half-court team. Miller is good, but with him on the ball, Ty Lawson has no chance to break down defenses when he is lurking on the wing.
As someone said early, this should be a lay-up for Portland.
Is your love worth the nausea it could bring?
"this should be a lay-up for Portland."
I felt pretty good about this game until I read that sentence. Do we get to pick who shoots the lay-up?
Are you implying that some Blazers have issues shooting layups?
Cos I thought it was just Nuggets who had that problem. Nene missed four close-range shots — four!!! — last night in the Nuggets’ 4-point loss.
Is your love worth the nausea it could bring?
Missing just four point blank shots
doesn’t even get an honorable mention, here.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
Go Blazers!
It,ll be tought tonight,but…I hope that Blazers will pull it off and win…Go Blazers!

by 


































