Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

What do y'all want in a head coach?

Nate McMillan aside, I'm curious as to what qualities you guys want in a head coach.

Topics on this matter include stuff such as offensive style, defensive style, pace preference, rotation size, minute distribution, personality, media interaction, veteran experience vs. youthful vigor, and whatever else pops into your head. Or, perhaps, you may not care one way or the other.

Mainly, I just wonder what preferences everybody has when it comes to a head coach.

Comment 177 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Second that.

Somebody with a vision for the team. Somebody that can teach the players to stay present in the moment when the moment gets bigger. Someone who gets along with the players. Really understanding the player’s strengths would be paramount.

by gunballs on Feb 21, 2012 7:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Not necessarily gets along with..but whom the players respect.

A coach who effectively communicates, both during games and in practice sessions. To the entire team and to each individual player.
A coach who is able to get the players to play to WIN AS A TEAM, accept their roles as players on a team who must do what they need to do to win a championship.

by Natsthecat on Feb 21, 2012 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Third that

Rick Adelman always struck me as this type of coach, where his style varied depending on his personnel.

by superfly05 on Feb 21, 2012 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I want a coach that partners

with the GM….much like tonight’s opponent, pop and buford.

I want a coach that makes every player on the team feel valuable.

I want a coach that demands respect because of WHO HE IS as a person.

I want a coach who coaches for the whole season and the big picture and not merely game to game. He coaches so that his team peaks come playoff time.

I want a coach who never throws his players under the bus with the press unless his name is Phil Jackson and he is expert at coaching through the press.

I want a coach who CARES about his players as people.

I want a coach who balances tactical chops with excellent communication skills.

I want a coach who can be completely in the game while maintaining self-composure.

I want a coach that we, the fans, would defend and side with over ANY player.

by inpresence on Feb 21, 2012 7:39 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

Did you see how pop sacrificed

the Spurs winning streak for the greater good of the season and beyond?….that, my friends, is big picture thinking….

by inpresence on Feb 22, 2012 12:09 AM PST up reply actions  

you can do that when you're 23-9

not so much when you’re 17-16

"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'

by sammymohawk on Feb 22, 2012 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

actually

I don’t think many coaches with any record would do it. It is a pop specialty.

by inpresence on Feb 22, 2012 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

"I want a coach that we, the fans, would defend and side with over ANY player."

That’s tough to find, as not even Phil Jackson was awarded that luxury. Perhaps Gregg Popovich has it, but that’s because he’s never butted heads with his star player, Tim Duncan, so fans can unwaveringly support them both without division.

by AK1984 on Feb 21, 2012 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

not only LMA

the entire team.

I want a coach that we, the fans, would defend and side with over ANY player.

I’d change this to…I want a coach who is wise enough to allow the fans to choose his side in any dispute with any player.

Popovich wisely does not have disputes with Tim Duncan ever. There is no cause. The fans don’t have to choose.
If there is a dispute with a player…that player obviously deserves it.
Popovich coaches in such a way as to bring out the best in his players.

by Natsthecat on Feb 21, 2012 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

That is also is large part because Duncan doesn't have disputes with coaches either

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

And Nic, and Elliot

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with this, nice post!

It reminded me a lot of the Tripping Daisy song “I Got A Girl”

I want a coach who lives with me.
I want a coach who smells so sweetly…

I want a coach who is so right
I want a coach who is their guiding light

Well coach knows, what they need, I feel they’re going higher and higher

I want a coach who speaks his mind
I want a coach who’ll argue any time

by ZenGarden on Feb 22, 2012 8:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Nate.

BATUUUUM SHAKALAKA!

by Z-Bones on Feb 21, 2012 8:05 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

Not.

LaMarcus "Macrohard" Aldridge

by LaoTzu on Feb 21, 2012 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

like to see a coach running real offensive sets

actually, with the current portland team, someone like a jerry sloan would be interesting.

he demands his players play defense, but runs a very solid half court offense with incredible usage of pick/roll activity. this would really benefit aldridge and also give 3 point shooters wideopen looks.

as long time season ticket holder for the jazz (20+ years unti i moved to oregon), can say that sloan’s style of offense is faster than most think it is. ball movement and multiple picks/screens free up lots of easy baskets.

that said, sloan’s teams to run the fast break pretty well, too.

by utahcoyote on Feb 21, 2012 8:49 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

What bothers me a bit...

…is the fact that our assistant coaches’ average age is over 54 years old (and this number is skewed quite a bit due to Kaleb Canales’ age. Without Canales, the average age is 61).

I cannot help but wonder if the 30/40-year age gap between players and assistant coaches is a problem. I hope it isn’t, but I cannot help but think that it is. It seems to me that we have one of the oldest collection of coaches in the NBA.

Respect these years.

by Mister Hooligan on Feb 21, 2012 8:51 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

I am not sure I see the relevance

Old coaches are a part of the NBA landscape…always have been

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 9:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Why would that make any difference

if it is the right coach…ala Tex Winters

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 12:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Team (Average Assistant Coach Age)

San Antonio (43.6)
Chicago (46.4)
Oklahoma City (44.3)

These were the FIRST three teams that I looked at. I think it is relevant and that is my opinion.

by Mister Hooligan on Feb 21, 2012 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Well ok

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

citing exceptional people

does not really make the case though…a stronger argument skews toward norms for championship staffs…that is what we shuld look at in this debate.

Relateability is an important aspect of any human endeavor involving groups of people. Age may not be THE defining factor as it were, but all things being equal it could have some impact on how the players react to the coaches…

That is not to say the entire staff ought to be younger and that older coaches do not bring significant value, but if there is a communication problem between the staff and the players, this age thing might be a factor to consider…

and frankly, given the inconsistent performance of this team it seems to me that the players can’t be listening to the coaches. Either that or the coaches are just that bad at their jobs.

"What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?"
— Ralph Ellison (Invisible Man)

by PDXBuckeye on Feb 25, 2012 10:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Intelligence

I want a coach that understands the game and can communicate it with both the players and fans. I want to actually learn something I don’t know from the coach’s pressers. I want a coach that every few games tries something creative. I want to see players that work hard and show promise rewarded with playing time and increased responsibility, regardless of age/contract. I want a coach that’s wise enough and confident enough to hire assistants smarter than he is about certain aspects of the game.

"Bend your legs!" -Nate McMillan

by BaylessFace on Feb 21, 2012 9:29 AM PST reply actions  

Vinny Del Negro

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 9:34 AM PST reply actions  

I'm pretty sure he is.

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 21, 2012 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm dead serious

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Hmm...funny how coachs get better

when they get better players (looking at CP3)

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

haha

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I am serious

Coaches look a lot better…when the get better players. Doc Rivers case in point, If the Clips have some success, people will forget all about Chicago and deem Vinnie a good coach….I guarantee it!

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I really can't imagine anyone ever forgetting about how bad The Black was in Chicago

But yeah, River’s probably benefits a lot from his players. But, he’s also done a good job of hiring great assistants who can create excellent defensive schemes.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 1:11 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think doc Rivers also

has the good sense to stay out of the way when you have three hall-of-fame guys in your starting lineup. He seems like more of an inspirational guy than an actual coach.

by superfly05 on Feb 21, 2012 5:11 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I don't know much about Rivers but read

an article after they won the championship giving him the credit for getting his three hall of famers to agree to limited minutes in order to be fresh for the playoffs. That must not have been easy with Garnett the psycho wanting to win every game. So if that’s true, he got the big picture right, something which Pops seems to be a master at, and which Nate seems to be severely lacking at because he doesn’t nurture rookies despite this year being at best one and done.

by thaisteve on Feb 21, 2012 7:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Doc Rivers...2 very good points. The guy is WISE.

1. Hires assistant coaches who are great at what they do. And doesn’t view this as a possible threat.
2. Is able to manage players egos…huge + for a head coach.

by Natsthecat on Feb 22, 2012 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

While its inarguably the case that coaches are often credited with a turnaround that had more to do with players, a huge key for Doc was hiring an elite assistant in Thibodeau to address a major weakness of his.

by jksnake99 on Feb 21, 2012 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, Doc Rivers badly needed an Xs and Os lead assistant.

In 1983, Billy Cunningham had Chuck Daly. In 1994 & 1995, Rudy T. had Jim Boylen. In 2007, Rivers had Thibs.

There’s got to be other examples, too, but I can’t come up with them right now.

by AK1984 on Feb 21, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

PJ and Tex?

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 21, 2012 3:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Nate and Bob Ociepka?

I swear that guy must be a hell of a coach, because his charisma is a negative number.

by superfly05 on Feb 22, 2012 2:40 PM PST up reply actions  

nope. The guy was a safe hire for Nate.

His pal Vinnie the Black knew him. And the Bulls defense was very very crummy while he was there. The Bulls were lazy as a friend who is a Bulls fan stated at that time..they looked unmotivated while playing the Blazers…on the road…remind anyone of the Blazers this year?

by Natsthecat on Feb 22, 2012 6:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah. A good coach is also one who knows his weaknesses

And gets assistant coaches who can fill those needs.

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 22, 2012 12:24 AM PST up reply actions  

One of my bigger issues with Nate, and one of the things I'd like to see from our next coach

is the willingness to incorporate young players into the mix, acclimate them to the NBA, and allow them the chance to make a mistake or two without it being the end of their night.

The roster is still my priority though

"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'

by sammymohawk on Feb 21, 2012 9:46 AM PST reply actions  

Agreed-- fix the roster before you change the coach

Nate is the assistant coach for the National Olympic team. Hes well respected amongst all other superstar players and coaches and teams. I dont agree with everything he does but hes gotten the best out of what hes had to work with. This year is an exception to that but this year is a year with an * (asterisk)by it anyways because of the lockout. Nate is a great coach, doomed to have only coached mediocre teams that at best make the playoffs but never seriously threaten for the championship. The thing is, what coach is available that could be had and are definitely BETTER than Nate? IDK if their is anyone. This team needs to go out of its way to court players to come here. And nothing eases the courting more than MONEY which PA has. Wave a nice wad under some of these guys noses and maybe they will change their minds.

by cavejunctionblazer on Feb 21, 2012 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Ron Adams.

I think.

I dunno, I would’ve said Dwane Casey last year, but I’ve been very underwhelmed at how he’s doing as a head coach.

Basically I want a guy who understands the fundamentals but also understands the stats (i.e. best shots are dunks and layups and corner threes, so design your offense to get those shots and your defense to deny your opponents those shots).

I want a coach who understands how to give his players royal jelly—which doesn’t mean the same thing as being permissive, there means giving his players a combination of a good disciplinary structure, but also giving his players enough space to succeed, with realistic goals and a reward structure that encourages both player development and improving on-court performance.

by howlingfantods on Feb 21, 2012 10:20 AM PST reply actions  

I want a coach who actually communicates with his players. They know why things are happening instead of

just what is happening.

I’d also like a coach with a track record of developing young players.

by raoulduke on Feb 21, 2012 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

Related question: who takes over if Nate was fired mid-season?

IF Nate were fired mid-season, which I think is unlikely, who would take over? It is extremely rare that someone from the outside is brought in mid-season.

Instead, you’d have an interim coach picked from the ranks of the current assistants. Bickerstaff seems the most likely candidate.

Is there anyone on the bench who you think would do a good job in on an interim basis?

by grigs on Feb 21, 2012 11:01 AM PST reply actions  

a coach is only as good as his players.

But I would like one that can recognize when a younger guy is better than a current player getting more minutes. And one that won’t pull a player that’s on fire out of the game. And one that will bench wing players that aren’t looking to feed LaMarcus every play. And one that doesn’t want to add guys like Crawford just because he’s not afraid to chuck the ball at any and every chance.

by hoodieNation on Feb 21, 2012 11:13 AM PST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Isn't that a bit predictable?
And one that will bench wing players that aren’t looking to feed LaMarcus every play.

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm ok with predictable when were winning.

And for the most part I trust LA to make good decisions with the ball.

by hoodieNation on Feb 21, 2012 1:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Well....LMA is already getting more shot attempts per game this season .....

…..than he ever has, so I am not sure that that is really a problem

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Feb 21, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Lionel Hollins
  1. Experience developing a point guard in Mike Conley
  2. Won a playoff series in his first trip to the playoffs
  3. Defense oriented
  4. His offense is based on an inside-out attack, starting with his two big men Gasol & Randolph. Out to Conley/Gay/Mayo on the perimeter.
  5. He was drafted by Portland and played for one of the best teams of all time, the 77’ Blazers

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Feb 21, 2012 11:20 AM PST reply actions  

He also oddly seems to have no affinity or relationship to Portland

Not that it’s a requirement, but you’d think if your best years of playing were here, you’d be a little more connected.

On a related note, I also notice that many of the former Blazers that played for the team prior to Paul Allen’s ownership have strained relations at best.

by superfly05 on Feb 21, 2012 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Patch the relationship -

Petrie 4 GM, Hollins 4 Head Coach :p

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Feb 22, 2012 12:03 AM PST up reply actions  

That's just disgusting.

I suppose you also want to replace the Mike’s with Clyde and Walton.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 22, 2012 11:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Bill Walton and Mike Rice.

Most ridiculous announcing team ever.

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 22, 2012 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

AK1984 ...who would you choose as GM???

Because this may determine who is on the coaching staff, right?

by Natsthecat on Feb 21, 2012 11:36 AM PST reply actions  

someone who:

Identifies his player’s strengths and weaknesses and gives them set roles.
Can gain a mutual respect with his players.
An offensive system with more ball movement
a strong defense with less switching

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 21, 2012 11:42 AM PST reply actions  

I’d want an elite defensive tactician first and foremost. I’m a believer that defense is much more about coaching relative to players than offense, so I want offensively skilled players and a coach with elite defensive acumen.

by jksnake99 on Feb 21, 2012 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

Kind of off topic

But I strongly believe we haven’t hired a new GM yet because we are waiting to fire Nate at the end of this season. I think they want to bring in a GM and Coach at the same time so they can have a completely clean slate. They can have a vision team wide and not have two guys butting heads.

by AR-15 on Feb 21, 2012 12:23 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think that is it. I think Paul knows exactly who he wants for the next GM.

He’s just waiting for that guy’s contract to run out, else he would be interviewing candidates. That’s the logical assumption.

Nate has 2 years left on his contract (counting this year). Paul may fire him at the end of the season but that wouldn’t stop him from bringing in a GM now. They need a GM for this trade deadline and the draft in June. A new GM now would get time to assess the players and Nate before the draft and summer free agency. Paul’s waiting because the guy he wants is under contract somewhere now.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 21, 2012 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

You could also argue he hasn't filled the spot because he's in process of selling the team

and the new owner wants to pick his own GM. But the spot has been vacant so long that doesn’t fit the timeline.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 21, 2012 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I don't think that's it.

I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain

Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16

by Tyler Durrden on Feb 21, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

eh, a new owner can fire a GM if he feels like it

And not having a GM doesn’t do wonders for the value of the team.

by superfly05 on Feb 21, 2012 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, way too many GMs in this league are pretty horrible.

especially the ones that aren’t locked up by their teams

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 21, 2012 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I heard the Blazers are looking for a top tier GM...names mentioned were

the guy on OKC and Sacramento’s GM. And that the plan is to have that guy hire his coaching staff.

by Natsthecat on Feb 22, 2012 12:03 AM PST up reply actions  

well that's weird...got the message to wait a few seconds to post..

and the title was posted twice without the rest…OKC’s GM and Sacramento’s GM. It was said that the new GM would then hire a coaching staff.

by Natsthecat on Feb 22, 2012 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Who would that be?

There are only 29 GMs in the league. Who would fit the bill?

by grigs on Feb 21, 2012 6:29 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

IDK

Next season we have a TON of cap space. It would be a perfect situation for a new GM to come into. Pretty much get to put a whole new team together and pick your Coach. I could be wrong, as I also see where you are coming from, but I don’t think my gut feeling is too far off base.

by AR-15 on Feb 21, 2012 6:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed,

They are going after a big time GM who will insist on autonomy and that will begin with the hiring of their coach.

by Visionary2 on Feb 21, 2012 11:36 PM PST up reply actions  

for GM? I'm down.

Everything I needed to know about basketball I learned from watching the ‘80-’90 Boston Celtcs (at the garden)

by johnshmidt on Feb 21, 2012 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Mike Budenholzer.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum and Aldridge/ /BLOW IT UP/

by gtbassett on Feb 21, 2012 2:04 PM PST reply actions  

Tom Thibodeau

Excellent chess, not middling checkers player.

Gives nothing away for free while playing great D. Has whole team playing fundamentally sound, hard, smart basketball. Able to get out of the way and coach up superstar players.

by loyal_blazer on Feb 21, 2012 2:13 PM PST reply actions  

player development, tough love, be direct, have confidence in your team, let it ride...

Let the kids play! Let ‘em fail for more than :90 seconds at a time, see if they learn anything.
… memories from being a rookie in Portland… watched a lot of basketball.
OH AND PLAY TO YOUR PLAYERS STRENGTHS!
With Batum and Wallace, there’s no reason we shouldn’t be throwing poor man’s Miami Heat touchdown alley oops at least 2-3 times a game.

by johnshmidt on Feb 21, 2012 2:15 PM PST reply actions  

who is going to throw long alley oops,

what with the worst passing backcourt in the Western playoff picture…

i keep dancing on my own.

by atomiccafe on Feb 21, 2012 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Tee-hee, Flip Saunders. Kidding...

Probably Tom Thibadeau or Gregg Poppovich.

by lawalteral14 on Feb 21, 2012 2:25 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Interestingly, Flip Saunders is a good example of how an offensive-minded coach can't mold players ...

on offense to the same extent that a defensive-minded coach can mold players on defense. So, in essence, a defensive-minded coach like Scott Skiles possesses a larger impact than an offensive-minded coach like Saunders.

by AK1984 on Feb 21, 2012 3:21 PM PST up reply actions  

How about Adelman?

I’m trying to remember who his defensive genius was in Portland and can’t.

scrappy

by Honka Playboy on Feb 21, 2012 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Adelman

is one of the few coaches I wouldn’t mind that I think we MIGHT be able to get. Minnesota is a crappy place to be lets be honest, but Adelman is also a retread so idk how he would feel about that.

by AR-15 on Feb 21, 2012 6:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not saying it's true

but I remember people saying how Dumb Adelman was and what a low IQ the Blazer team had both after we lost the one year to an inferior LA team and then lost the finals to Chicago. Now when people talk about him it’s like the second coming.

by XBlazerfan on Feb 21, 2012 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

now if he'd just play Captain Jack so he can produce for my fantasy team...

"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'

by sammymohawk on Feb 22, 2012 9:52 AM PST up reply actions  

You put a knowingly put a Skiles player on your fantasy team???

Smh…

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 22, 2012 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

I would say

Nate needs to chill out. One quality I liked about Phil Jackson was the fact he just chilled out and let his boys play. Nates probably got ulcers and full gray hair by now from all the stress he causes himself. Hes always marching up and down the sidline lookin all pissed off. I never see him give any body 5 when they come back to the bench, no back slaps, nada. He needs to loosin up IMHO. I like a coach who is more mellow.

by cavejunctionblazer on Feb 21, 2012 4:43 PM PST reply actions  

How about guards,

who act like professionals. Come to work in shape, play ball, and quit crying to the media ? Then, an owner who isnt dazzled by flashy guards, and wants new ones every year ?
Offense sells tickets, defense wins games.

I was raised by a Sarge, I handle it, and I’m a girl. Nates job is to win games, not babysit grown men and answer the same stupid questions year after year.

Man up and play already sissies !!

just win baby !

by FrenchieFan on Feb 21, 2012 7:06 PM PST reply actions  

A coach that looks toward the future

as far as evaluating and developing young talent. Looking like Kate Upton would be a plus in my book also.

by Norwester on Feb 21, 2012 8:26 PM PST reply actions  

In a word, Pop....

To win a championship, that has to be your goal, from Day One to Day Infinity.
It means thinking long term, both in the front office, the training rooms, the coaches office, and on the court.
Pop is among the best because he is unafraid. Unafraid of fines by Stern. Unafraid of media hacks. Unafraid of losses.

We don’t even have a GM, so you’d be hard pressed to convince me there is any long term plan (short term plan, this season, I get it – don’t forget, we were 7-2 before Sarge’s “training” took hold…)

We have a highly overrated coach, IMO. He is lauded for his D, which AK has shown us all to be crap. He has ZERO concept of how to run an offense. He wants his team but is unable to make them able to achieve any kind of success on a 3 on 1.

I want a coach who is willing to lose the battle to win the war.

I want a coach who is willing to adapt his scheme to his players.

I want a coach who has been around enough to realize that the NBA is a playoff league. Period.

I want a coach who will ride the hot hand.

I want a coach who understands that you have to teach players how to run a fast break (touch the sideline at the halfcourt stripe, then head to the hoop) , not just yell “go” from the sidelines.

I want a coach who realizes that D still does win championships.

I want a coach who isn’t wondering why the NBA roster has any more than 8 or 9 players on it.

In short, I want a coach.

by Visionary2 on Feb 21, 2012 11:53 PM PST reply actions  

Nate would be fine

minus a couple of his weird tendencies. Like his clear hatred of anyone good who is young and his inability to bring the bench in during blow out games.

LaMarcus Aldridge All-Star 2011-2012.

by Eat Politicians on Feb 21, 2012 11:55 PM PST reply actions  

Nate likes players who remind him of himself.

Blake, Matthews.
Doesn’t prefer players who are just gifted and have an “easier” time of it…LMA, Batum….
Roy is the outlier here. Nate loved Roy and Roy was gifted.

by Natsthecat on Feb 22, 2012 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Runner-up: Larry Brown

He has the added bonus of hating all the guys he finds on a roster when taking over, so at least he’d be definitely doing some rebuilding no matter if the GM and owner really intended that or not.

by Norsktroll on Feb 22, 2012 12:04 AM PST reply actions  

Larry Brown is one of my favorites

of course age could be an issue, but I thihk he is healthy. I don’t care if he does not stay long. It would be fascinating to see what he could do with the team. I have a lot of confidence in his knowledge, incredible experiece, including championship ring (Pistons) relating to players like Rasheed and Iverson. I remember him coming out against the refs for targeting Sheed for technicals – player support. Iverson loved him. I just don’t see how LB would not have instant respect in the locker room. If I was owner, I would certainly reach out to him and see if he might be interested. He would not have to fear being eclipsed by the most competent assistants, who would love the chance to work with and learn from the legend.

If what you are doing is not working, try something else.

by Berkeley on Feb 22, 2012 1:15 AM PST up reply actions  

A few quick coach Larry Brown bullet points:


- InsideHoops.com considers him the best teacher in the entire basketball coaching game

- Almost every team Larry Brown coaches tends to overachieve and do better than expected

- Enshrined into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame’s Class of 2002

- Larry Brown has won three ABA Coach of the Year awards

- Won 2001 NBA Coach of the Year honors

- Won NCAA Championship in 1988

- Won NBA Championship in 2004

- Coached 2003-04 Detroit Pistons to the NBA Championship in his first year as head coach

- Became first coach to win a NCAA and NBA Championship

- Was 12th coach in NBA history to win an NBA title in his first season

- Has coached an NBA record seven different teams to the NBA Playoffs

- Won his 900th career NBA game in 2003-04, becoming the seventh coach in NBA history to win 900 games

- Larry Brown spent four seasons in the ABA, earning Coach of the Year honors three times

- Brown returned to the collegiate ranks in 1979 as head coach at UCLA. The Bruins immediately went to the national championship game

- Spent five seasons as head coach at the University of Kansas, where he won the national championship in 1988

- As a player, Larry Brown was a member of the 1964 gold medal U.S. Olympic basketball team

- Brown is the only U.S. male to both play and coach in the Olympics

I noticed he interviewed for the Minny coach job a year ago, so, maybe an option.

If what you are doing is not working, try something else.

by Berkeley on Feb 22, 2012 1:23 AM PST up reply actions  

If you have a contender already built, you go for it.

but he doesn’t tend to stick around very long, so you want to have a great team already coming in so that we can get immediate results.

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 22, 2012 1:37 AM PST up reply actions  

He is usually really good at player development, though

So if you’ve got some young guys with a lot of potential and steep learning curves (Elliot and Nic come to mind), he could be a really good stop gap to get us to the contending stage. The only problem is that he likes to play GM, and he’s got a Trader Bob mentality.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 22, 2012 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

There's also Jerry Sloan.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Feb 22, 2012 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Adaptable offense, fundamental defense

Good offensive systems come in a lot of flavors – and many of them are personnel-dependent. Certain fundamentals are always in play, however:

1) Get the highest percentage shot available against a defense (which is always a function of what players do well individually)
2) Keep the ball moving (ball moves faster than feet)
3) Make defenses pay for double teaming, fronting, jumping passing lanes
4) Take advantage of mismatches by going over the top or around smaller or less mobile defenders
5) Make all five defenders play excellent defense every play

Besides that, I want a coach that can coach players to their natural strengths – both developing skills and getting them to understand shot selection. I want a coach that will run the same play 50 times in a row if the defense can’t stop it. I want a coach that can punish gimmicks by getting his players to recognize weaknesses. I want a coach that commands respect and loyalty from his players – and returns the favor. I want a coach that is willing and ready to win 10 different ways – but always one step ahead.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 22, 2012 1:59 AM PST reply actions  

Sweet, sweet love

And kisses that go deep in the mouth and last all night long.

So Nate’s been working for me.

Steve Goodman lives.

by twinsbrewer on Feb 22, 2012 2:32 AM PST reply actions  

I mean I want to rebuild with a coach not worried about winning now, but about developing young talent.

Nate looks like a rental coach who will end the season saving his record and leaving for greener pastures sooner than later. It all starts with a new GM (Cho was the man, but…) and then a new coach.

by amlmart1 on Feb 22, 2012 5:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah he is great

He probably won’t do coaching again though at his age. The travel would be rough.

by Sheed'sTowel on Feb 22, 2012 7:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd have to say a proven winner

and a couple of guys come to mind Jerry Sloan, Rick Adelman… They coached with class… With the exception of Deron Williams driving Sloan out of Utah and then leaving… I’d say they never had any real bad interactions with players…. They have been to the big show… adelman with a few teams… plus bring in one of these guys restores the Brandon Roy class to portland and shadows the jail blazers. I would throw George Karl in that mix as well and Gregg Pop but he ain’t leaving the spurs. These guys have a sense of coaching the pieces he has to win

by Canthus90 on Feb 22, 2012 11:45 AM PST reply actions  

Characteristics of my preferred coach

Someone open, flexible, and opportunistic on offense and with rosters.

Someone fundamental and solid on stressing defensive persistence over scrap.

Someone who will hold the players accountable in practice and the locker room and stand up for them and take the blame in the media.

by your face on Feb 22, 2012 12:41 PM PST reply actions  

coach that would fit best with portland!

Jerry Sloan. He would make LMA into an even bigger star then he already is, and would refine one of our gaurds into a star point.

by mmazour on Feb 22, 2012 7:01 PM PST reply actions  

Haven't really thought about it much lately

But I think Monty was a great assistant. I would really like to see something like a coaching staff with Budenholzer/Monty/Ron Adams on it. Would be pretty impossible though seeing as they would all want to be the head coach. That would be one great team though.

by Sheed'sTowel on Feb 22, 2012 7:20 PM PST reply actions  

I want a coach that gets his team to win a LOT of games

that’s my number one priority . . . . .

put a body on 'em

by RayBourque on Feb 23, 2012 12:57 AM PST reply actions  

I still want what I wanted before we signed Nate.

Lionel Hollins. The problem is it’s going to be harder to get him now.

Loud pipes save lives!
Bad knees break hearts!
Time for an exorcism.

by We-B-Dunkin on Feb 23, 2012 10:07 AM PST reply actions  

at 1st any name that does not begin with Nate!!!!!

by Danvegas on Feb 23, 2012 7:45 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Nvm, nate mcmillan aside...

somebody young and an assistant. I feel that NBA coaches get too many chances in general. There’s not enough turnover in the coaching position. If you’re .500 in the nba you can have a job for life(lenny wilkens, del negro, george karl, etc….).

Larry Bird if he wanted to coach again.

by kengriffey on Feb 23, 2012 9:54 PM PST up reply actions  

"There’s not enough turnover in the coaching position."

I agree.

“Larry Bird if he wanted to coach again.”

Rick Carlisle did the Xs & Os for Larry Bird.

by AK1984 on Feb 24, 2012 12:25 AM PST up reply actions  

And it's even worse with GM's

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 24, 2012 7:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I dont understand

why that is either. IMO to be a good GM is just to be good at sales. You have a vision for what you want, you have a scouting crew to find those guys for you. Then you just need to sell other GMs on trading you their guys. Of course there is more to it then that, but not enough to warrant the same like 45 or less guys in those roles over the last 2 decades.

by AR-15 on Feb 24, 2012 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I know you're a fan of Fratello since you often mention him...

and, I’m open to the idea. I’m curious, just what do you see in him that you don’t see in Nate? His career stats aren’t terrific. Bear in mind that I’d almost settle for Mo Cheeks again at this point….

by kuhnsmith on Feb 25, 2012 9:54 AM PST reply actions  

Mike Fratello is a great defensive coach, knows his Xs & Os, and will lower the number of possessions.

If some team hires Fratello, it should get from him what the Philadelphia 76ers have got from Doug Collins.

by AK1984 on Feb 25, 2012 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

I am sold.

And, since Chad B. is saying that the Blazers are looking at all options to improve the team, one would hope that includes giving Nate the old heave ho. Of course, I’d be absolutely shocked (and delighted) if that happened this season, and only a little less shocked (but still delighted) if it happens before his contract is up. Even then, it seems like we’re stuck with “Sarge” indefinitely…

by kuhnsmith on Feb 25, 2012 3:50 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks

Recent FanPosts

Small
Portland's Team for next year?
Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm