Lin and LMA mentioned together in the news
So despite all the woes that a Blazer season brings any diehard fan, I found this to be pretty interesting.
For anyone not watching Sportscenter or listening to sports radio, there has been this emergence of a guy in New York calling himself Jeremy Lin. Now, some call it "Linsanity" (me, personally, don't want to insult him by refering to Vince Carter and the very short-lived era that was "Vince-sanity"), and others think they are just oh-so clever because they can substitute "in" with "Lin." It's Lin-corrigible and Lin-noying. All that really matters to me is how this relates to Portland.
Thus, allow me to bring you this segue. On the nationally broadcast and televised Dan Patrick Show (Fox Sports radio and DirecTV), Dan had on Ed Weiland, a FedEx driver who also writes for hoopsanalyst.com. He speaks of how he "called" the success of Jeremy Lin based on number crunching. When asked if he had ever "missed on anybody recently with [his] statistical data," Ed replied,
"Um, well the big one is LaMarcus Aldridge, um, a few years ago. I - I had him as a career back-up. And um, you know, his play has kind of shoved that back into my face pretty good."
For anyone wanting to listen to that 10 second bit, I am unsure of how to post the audio, but I can at least provide the link. The above reference occurs Feb. 17, in hour 3, almost exactly 8 minutes in (I guess you can find it for free on iTunes too).
It's just nice to know LMA is still shoving it in someone's face while he's sidelined with that ankle.
6 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
career backup?
since game 1 of his second season, he’s pretty clearly and consistently been at the very least a quality NBA starter. Anyone who had him pegged as a career backup clearly wasn’t paying attention.
"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave
his first game ever against dirk,
he showed the potential to be a star.
nate and injuries kinda screwed with him his rookie year. (magloire played ahead of him at times), but he showed flashes of big potential with games in which he had 24/17 and 27/14, etc etc. the heart thing came up at the end of the year and kinda got our spirits down, but he was fine for the most part.
PHILLY!
I think his point was to "call" players based purely on college stats
or that’s my guess from the context. Meaning you wouldn’t have any NBA play/stats as a reference. But in any case, he was clearly wrong, as he admits.
yeah, he's all about shoving "it" in someone's face.
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Feb 17, 2012 11:28 AM PST reply actions

by 



































