Calkins: Blazers F Kurt Thomas' Shooting Prowess
Matt Calkins of The Columbian explores the shooting proficiency of Portland Trail Blazers forward Kurt Thomas.
----------------------------
"Who’s the better shooter from 20 feet away, you or Kurt Thomas?" Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge was asked.
"Of course I am," Aldridge said. "You can even ask Kurt about that."
Fair enough.
"Hey Kurt, who’s the better shooter from 20 feet away, you or LaMarcus?"
"That’s not even close," said Thomas, Aldridge’s 39-year-old teammate. "Of course he’s going to say he is, but I think everyone knows I can shoot the outside jumper, and I believe I show it night in and night out."
It’s true.
----------------------------
I mentioned this was in the works last week and he didn't disappoint.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
3 months ago
Ben Golliver
36 comments
0 recs |
Comments
So am I to understand Kurt is going to become a player/shooting coach?
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
Felton is the best player the
Blazers have at PG.
Disagree.
Smith is better. It’s pure addition by subtraction.
by The Penguin on Feb 13, 2012 8:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
what does this have to do with getting a new PG?
anyway; Kurt vs LaMarcus 20ft shooting contest. It’s on
Absolutely nothing so why are you dragging that conversation into this thread?
"Luke is our go-to Chalupa man," Matthews said. "Designated."
by Vorlauf on Feb 13, 2012 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
benching felton
should be mentioned anywhere and everywhere until it happens.
by The Penguin on Feb 14, 2012 12:08 PM PST up reply actions
Aldridge has nothing on Thomas in that part of the game
Aldridge got significantly better when he improved his post game and got inside more, I still hate it when Aldridge does that pick and pop. I wonder what his conversion rate is on that shot.
Aldridge is a bit over 44% from there right now
Kurt is a ridiculous near 60% but way less shots and always wide open and feet set. Makes me wish he hadn’t passed up that possible tying shot a couple games ago.
44%…can’t really be too mad about that. That’s just crazy for a guy that gets as much defensive attention as Aldridge does. And he mixes things up enough to keep his shooting percentage above 50%.
Yeah
I feel like Lamarcus is actually getting better on that outside shot while at the same time improving close to the basket.
I like him shooting particularly in the first couple of quarters. towards the end of the game i feel like his efficiency from far goes down quite a bit as he gets tired.
It seems like LMAs outside shooting was slipping last year.
But I think the idea of “Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis” holds as true for player development as it does for social development. LMA put a lot of energy into his post game last year, and having his shot wobble a bit is natural. How many times did he spin for the pick and pop and wonder if he was not being aggressive enough in the post?
This year, it’s pretty clear he’s reached a level of comfort where he is not having to think as much about whether he should be spinning to or from the hoop. He makes the call and goes for it, and his ability to finish has gone up both ways.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Feb 13, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions
i agree
seems like anything past 10ft dips ridiculously after around 30 minutes and then really bad at about 40 minutes. The quarter by quarter splits seem to favor the 2nd and 3rd quarters for him.
It was nice to see him actually make two game tying shots last game. Apparently he’s finding ways to be effective in clutch time even though he’s completely gassed. I’m intrigued to see where that goes.
Coin flip
But I think I have only seen Kurt miss 5 times. Im sure thats way off but that is what I’ve seen.
I would be equally comfortable with either taking a game winner from 15-20’
And he is never getting doubled
an takes 1/3 of the shots if not less.
So.. let's have Thomas start at guard. He's playing better than Wes or Ray right now.
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Feb 13, 2012 2:54 PM PST reply actions
Who cares who is better?
They both pretty damn good at that shot. Let’s work on the weaknesses now.
"Playing to win? I mean, s***, that's easy."
Lamarcus usually has a hand in his face when he's shooting.
Kurt Thomas, on the other hand, is avoided by defenders like he’s a leper.
by Arby on Feb 13, 2012 3:22 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
waiting for KG to call him a cancer to the team.
But seriously, I think the percentages in game will change drastically if he was guarded. I’m not complaining though, open shots are always a good thing when you can set up.
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
by SGT Lenny on Feb 13, 2012 4:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
This, exactly.
Love me some KT, but let’s see him do it with the best big defender on every opposing team in his grill plus how ever many other defenders the opposing team wants to throw at him all game. His admittedly reliable shot is partly due to the fact that LaMarcus is drawing all the defense away from him.
i dont remember the last time Kurt was doubled
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
by SGT Lenny on Feb 13, 2012 4:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I wish we had a couple more guys like Kurt
that would make defenses pay like clockwork for doubling against Aldridge. That’s part of the reason we started to see more Aldridge and Kurt in the same line-up even before Camby got bruised up.
I know we're arguing about who is the better shooter
so it’s legit to talk about the defense Kurt deals with vs the defense Aldridge deals with.
But to totally move away from the question of who is the better shooter in a vacuum and go to real game time… if our guards could make an open jumper, LA might never get doubled. I’m still not sure why people leave Kurt so open all the time. So long as you’re reliably converting over 50%, that’s pretty much a lock that you have to guard the guy. I’d leave any number of guards open at the perimeter open even before I’d leave Kurt open for that 16 footer and the trey ball is supposed to be a better shot than a long two usually.
So yeah, sure. He’s getting freebies. But there are a lot of players in the NBA who don’t make those “freebies” as reliably and I’m not sure LaMarcus does much better even when wide open. Kurt’s a role player on the team and he’s found a skill that he’s especially good at to be useful when he’s on the court. If some of our other role players were as tuned into their strengths and weaknesses, they might play with a little more purpose….
this exactly
If some of our other role players were as tuned into their strengths and weaknesses, they might play with a little more purpose….
Saw it at the beginning of the season. Every guy filling a role. Now we have every guy trying to bring what they supposedly worked on in the off season.
Guys that can’t dribble want to dribble now. Guys that can barely pass want to get fancy. Guys are passing up shots in the offense to try and put the ball on the floor. guys missing defensive assignments because they’re over playing or gambling for steals.
It’s like we only have a handful of guys left that are ok with simply using their abilities to fill a role they’re decent at. Unfortunately most of those guys are in positions 3 through 5.
I still think most of it starts at the 1 though. Jamal is fine with his role but he keeps getting pressed into trying to pick up the slack at the 1.
Guys like Kurt and Camby are gold because they specialize in what they’re good at instead of trying to take on a role that they don’t fit.
by poorwebguy on Feb 13, 2012 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
It's what I've always admired about San Antonio.
They seem to keep a system of making their role players just look better than everyone else’s role players. I think this is the reason why.
Perfect.
Guys like Kurt and Camby are gold because they specialize in what they’re good at instead of trying to take on a role that they don’t fit.
Exactly. After LaMarcus, Kurt & Marcus are the two most consistent players in the minutes they provide, because they know their role.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
answer is LA... he always has a guy in his face and still drills the shots
Kurt only shoots when hes wide open from a pick and pop.
Maybe the question is who would drain an open shot more reliably?
In which case it’s tough to call. Obviously LaMarcus can hit the contested jumpers more easily.
Didn't Aldridge...
…take some criticism a few games back when late in a game The Blazers went into the post to Aldridge and instead of taking the shot, he passed out to Kurt Thomas…who immediately froze up and looked like he wanted nothing to do with the ball? It ended up being a botched play.
The only thing I’ll say is if Kurt is confident in his shot in practice, and “most” of the time, then perhaps Aldridges quick pass out to Thomas wasn’t such a bad decision. The key is if Thomas is confident in that 20ft jumper….he’s got to be willing to pull the trigger in crunch time.
Aldridge took a lot of heat for that late game decision. If Kurt can hit it? He’s got to take it.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
agreed
58% is ridiculous. In hindsight, if Kurt had pulled the trigger and hit the shot Aldridge would be getting praise instead of flak and he’d have one more assist for his stat line.
Yep.
Thomas had a hot potato on his hands and couldn’t dish it to Crawford fast enough who failed. I really wished Kurt took the shot. It was right from his sweet spot and he had an open look. It was his opportunity to be clutch!
"Luke is our go-to Chalupa man," Matthews said. "Designated."































