Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Rob Mahoney of The Two Man Game writes that the Portland Trail Blazers needed to run things through forward LaMarcus Aldridge during the overtime periods of a Saturday night loss to the Dallas Mavericks.
-------------------------------------
It’s a genuine curiosity that Portland didn’t operate through LaMarcus Aldridge (33 points, 14-26 FG, 12 rebounds, one turnover) on every single offensive possession in both overtimes. Nate McMillan’s teams are typically fantastic at running plays that put the best players in a position to succeed and rely on those players to create (via scores in their comfort zone, passes out of double-teams, etc.), but the Blazer offense was entirely too reliant on Felton and Jamal Crawford (19 points, 6-23 FG, three turnovers) down the stretch. I don’t mean too harp too much on the final 10 minutes alone, but considering how good of a shot creator Aldridge has become, the Blazers’ closing possession distribution was pretty indefensible. Dallas defended Aldridge with Brendan Haywood for much of the game, and despite Haywood’s best efforts to contest shots, deny position, and limit angles for potential hook shots, Aldridge converted bucket after bucket. The man only forced both overtime periods with difficult, contested scores, after all. I’m not precisely sure who should be to blame for Portland’s uncharacteristic misuse of resources (McMillan? Crawford? Felton? Aldridge himself? LeBron James?), but someone in the Blazers’ locker room has some ’splaining to do.
-------------------------------------

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter

3 months ago Headshotsmall_tiny Ben Golliver 101 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

ever seen we got jamal

nate has converted back to having his guards hold ball for 20 seconds and iso.

/cambyfive

by CroRupt on Feb 12, 2012 10:47 AM PST reply actions  

Good question on who to blame.

This is my percentage breakdown on who are at fault: 30% for Nate, 50% on Crawford, 15% on Felton, and maybe 5% on Aldridge. Crawford gets most of the blame because he had the ball in his hands most of the time and chose to take it on his own instead of setting up Aldridge or others. Felton gets some because he chose a bad, bad, time to try to shoot himself out of a slump. AND, as a PG he should have looked for LaMarcus first. McMillan is the coach, and it’s his grand scheme so there’s some accountability there. And lastly, and it’s minor, but perhaps could turn into a huge one, Aldridge should probably lay it into the guards to make better decisions.

by Stryder9 on Feb 12, 2012 11:04 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

myth
Nate McMillan’s teams are typically fantastic at running plays that put the best players in a position to succeed and rely on those players to create (via scores in their comfort zone, passes out of double-teams, etc.)

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Feb 12, 2012 11:05 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I complained about this during the playoffs last season.

Nearly every possession down the stretch, Dirk touched the ball at least once. Exactly the opposite for LMA. The Blazers seem to forget about him at the end of the game.

I could understand if they were riding someone’s hot hand, but LMA scored 15 in the 4th quarter, for heaven’s sake.

As for who is to blame, how about all of the above? Nate and LMA need to insist that LMA get the ball, and LMA needs to take his teammates to task for not feeding him. He needs a little selfishness. Crawford, Felton, and others need to remember that LMA is the all-star, not them.

by hercher on Feb 12, 2012 11:12 AM PST reply actions  

Lamarcus is being ignored late in games because he isnt being verbally dominant with this team

He needs to express himself in a more sturdier manner to his teammates while being respectful ofcourse. I dont think Jamal and Felton would have had the balls to ignore LMA late in the game if they knew they would have some strong feedback coming their way from LMA. I know LMA likes to be laid back but sometimes you gotta break out of your mold and do what is required

WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE

by bowdown on Feb 12, 2012 11:17 AM PST reply actions  

I really don't know if he's got it in him.

I don’t think LMA is type to chew out a teammate. He takes it pretty easy. Heck, I saw him yucking it up with one of Mavs under the hoop during overtime. Anybody remember him and Roy having a laugh during a nasty loss to Denver last season?

He’s not wired to be a team leader. In every interview I’ve seen where folks ask him what it’s like to be The Man now that Roy is gone, he gets all sheepish and starts stuttering. Doesn’t make him any less of an All Star, but it does mean somebody else has to step up and hold the team accountable.

I’m hoping the Blazers find a PG that can take on that role because Felton perpetually looks, and plays, like he just woke up from a burrito nap.

Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers

by Adam Randall on Feb 12, 2012 11:33 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You may be right, we will see.
I’m hoping the Blazers find a PG that can take on that role because Felton perpetually looks, and plays, like he just woke up from a burrito nap.

This is hilarious. Rec.

I’m in total agreement that we need a lead guard to pair w/Aldridge.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Feb 12, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

But Nate preaches if you have a shot you have to take it

In fact, he said he pulled Nic, because he hesitated then passed the ball instead of taking the shot. Maybe it is just mixed signals.

hg

by BBK on Feb 13, 2012 5:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Aldridge wasn't a closer, last night?

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Blazers never lost a game with Brandon?

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Ya

but Brandon proved himself to be a leader and a closer. LMA hasn’t proved either yet.

by AR-15 on Feb 12, 2012 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Then won a lot more than they should have thanks to him.

by erastus25 on Feb 12, 2012 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

this never ceases to floor me

you’d think I would stop being surprised at some point

by poorwebguy on Feb 12, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

THAT WASNT LAMARCUS' FAULT.

When his coach calls play after play for a guy that is shooting like crap, and doesn’t FORCE his team to get the ball into Lamarcus (the guy that made a shot at the end of 4th qtr. and OT to force each extra period) Nate is the one to blame. This city is so ridiculous. How hard is it to see? Without Brandon Roy Nate McMillan’s closing record is ATROCIOUS! HE’S NOT A GOOD COACH!

by Blazer_Duck on Feb 12, 2012 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Not consistently, though her shows signs this year. I'd like to see the record of games over the last four

years of games decided by 6 points or less with Roy, vs, without Roy. I’m not trying to knock Aldridge, but I think that Roy may have been, if anything, under appreciated.

by raoulduke on Feb 12, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

When BRoy was healthy

We used to bet if the game was within 10 points at the 6 minute mark that BRoy would almost always win the game for Portland.

hg

by BBK on Feb 13, 2012 5:51 AM PST up reply actions  

LMA was setting a lot of picks out near the 3-point line

So the idea was either to free up the point guard or get open for a really long J. What was needed was to get Aldridge the ball as close to the basket as possible.

When the Blazers did get the ball to LMA in the post – his one option was to shoot the turnaround J.

Not very satisfactory.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 11:43 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

Really?..

I never would have guessed that from the other 300 posts you made saying the same thing.

Do you think Nate “coached” Crawford to dominate the ball… and to not pass to ANYONE… including LMA?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Players play and coached coach. Again, last night our players, namely Felton and Jamal let us down. Even with Crawford’s misses he had shots he should have made but missed. Our scheme didn’t lose our execution did!

#7... GO BLAZERS!!!

by Ilikeemall on Feb 12, 2012 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

At the crucial times...

Like the end of the second overtime and some of the first… Yes he most definitely dominated the ball. It’s all about timing my friend and he did the wrong thing at the wrong time.

If you’re actually trying to say LMA had the ball too much I’m relatively certain you’ll have a tough time supporting that position.

#7... GO BLAZERS!!!

by Ilikeemall on Feb 12, 2012 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

you are exaggerating he didnt dominate the ball in the first at all in fact LA,Nic,Crawford all had very good looks in the 1st OT

Nic,Jamal and LA all had very good looks that couldve gave us a 4pt lead in the 1st OT but missed them .First 3 possessions of the 2nd OT Felton shot the ball we called timeout and ran a play for jamal who got to the ft line .

After that we force a miss and jamal drives in and misses a short jumpshot and we then force a turnover and find LA who ties the game .

They call timeout and after that marions misses and we come down and go to do LA who misses and they come back down Marion misses again and Haywood tips it in and we call timeout and runs a set play for jamal .

All this ball dominating stuff is hilarious it simply doesnt matchup with what actually occured in the game at all.

LA was gassed having played 52 minutes and Dallas basically kept switching fresh bodies on him as he played 7 minutes more than any Maverick .

The one thing Ill say about this game as that everybody who wanted a opportunity got an opportunity to seal it down the stretch and couldnt . LA,Crawford,Nic,Felton all got GREAT looks and couldnt knock them down

by Willie Beamon on Feb 12, 2012 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

So how does this support the original post I made...

…that it was not Nate’s coaching that lost us the game but a lack of execution?

Sounds like a nice play by play but I SAW Jamal split off a screen with Nic where both defenders followed him leaving Nic wide open on the wing. Crawford didn’t make the pass and the play went nowhere after he, himself, missed a contested shot.

You’re right…everybody missed shots at some time during both OT’s that really could have helped us. Again I have to ask how that supports the original claim that “Nate is a one dimensional coach”? If we got all those shots you are referring to that could have sealed it was our offense… or Nate’s coaching… to blame or did we just miss the shots?

#7... GO BLAZERS!!!

by Ilikeemall on Feb 12, 2012 7:53 PM PST up reply actions  

That has been the song the whole year long

The Blazers guards can’t make their shots and we lose again.
When I was learning computers, I would type in the instructions and get a syntax error, I would type it in again and get a syntax error. time after time I would do the same thing and get the same error. Then it dawned on me, If my instructions are not working now, they will never work until I change my instructions.

So why go back to the same guards that has been failing all year, Nate will get the same results until he changes his instructions.

hg

by BBK on Feb 13, 2012 5:59 AM PST up reply actions  

In reference to...
If we got all those shots you are referring to that could have sealed it was our offense… or Nate’s coaching… to blame or did we just miss the shots?

by Natsthecat on Feb 12, 2012 9:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Scheme was a factor

This wasn’t just on players not doing what the coach wanted. If it was that – players grossly failing to execute a coach’s plan – then the coach is even more to blame…..

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

The "Scheme"...

…Gave Jamal Crawford several makeable shots that he simply couldn’t hit. He and Felton made it worse by taking some shots that came completely out of the offense.

This isn’t football where the coach calls a play every time we touch the ball. Our sets weren’t to blame execution was.

#7... GO BLAZERS!!!

by Ilikeemall on Feb 12, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Natsthecat...

You are right about this. Good for you for standing up for the truth!

by kuhnsmith on Feb 12, 2012 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

My favorite Aldridge move this season has been the up-and-under.

That shot either goes down or gets him to the line every time.

Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers

by Adam Randall on Feb 12, 2012 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I hate how much he fades

its cool cause its a hard shot to block. But if he would move towards the basket instead of away all the time he would be in the top 5 of the league for FT attempts.

by AR-15 on Feb 12, 2012 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

He said he was practicing south pawing it all summer

and has been moving that direction more and more as the season moves on. That one where he got hacked by Haywood but still got it to go was to me maybe one of the best moves I’ve ever seen him make.

by XBlazerfan on Feb 12, 2012 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

"spin baseline"

i find myself constantly saying the exact same thing as “the wild one” when LA gets the ball on the block. Most of the time that baseline spin is wide open for him. i bet it would open up so many little jumpers for LA if the defender had to respect that baseline move.

by 12planets on Feb 12, 2012 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah and he should get on the other side of the basket

more and then he could spin baseline with his right. If then he could go both ways from both sides, he’ll have four of a kind. Dribble penetrate and three pointers ahh a royal flush!

by XBlazerfan on Feb 12, 2012 5:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know who to blame here....

I agree The Blazers need to go through Aldridge more.

But who do I blame? Is it Nate NOT calling plays for Aldridge? Is it the PG or team simply not looking for him? Is it the media that has made “Aldridge a Closer” such a big issue that everyone is thinking about it? Is it Aldridge himself being too passive?

I remember Scottie Pippen keeping himself out of an end of game Playoff game, because he was upset at Phil Jackson for drawing up a play that did NOT run through him.

Maybe Aldridge needs to get more vocal with everyone and SAY…Get me The Ball.

There have been some end of game moments when the ball has gone into Aldridge and he has suddenly looked lost. Sudden pass out to Kurt Thomas anyone?

The more I think about it, the more I think the whole team just needs to work on end of game execution PERIOD. It’s not just NOT going through Aldridge. The team isn’t executing anything at the end of games well.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Feb 12, 2012 11:57 AM PST reply actions  

I put it on Nate. He is the coach and he can always call a play

If the coach calls a certain play and the players wont run it, then its his fault for losing the team. If LA isn’t getting the ball cuz Nate isn’t calling his plays, then that is also on Nate. If hes flat out not calling plays for LA then its still his fault for being an idiot… Either way he takes a good portion of blame.

by Kazper on Feb 12, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

We did run plays for LA the fact is that sometimes he doesnt fight for position all the time and last game he was worn down having played 52 minutes

But we did go to him and he missed just as Crawford ,Felton and Nic all missed looks that they can make . Mahoney talks about the final baskets but completely ignores the fact that LA did touch the prior to those plays

I was happy with some of the looks that we got for Nic ,jamal and even Felton . They were good in rhythm shots and while you want to look for LA everytime down the facts is that LA doesnt always fight for position and it is this thing called a 24 second clock .Dallas did a good job of rotating physical defenders on LA and we actually did a good job of moving the ball and getting the shots that we wanted . WE JUST DIDNT CONVERT but I was happy with the fight and if they compete like that for the rest of our road games we will start converting these into wins .

by Willie Beamon on Feb 12, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Thank you for clearing that up.

LMA should get further into the post. My point is that at some point, the guy is going to wear out. And not feel like continuing to try to muscle his way into the post.

in response to:

that LA doesnt always fight for position and it is this thing called a 24 second clock

by Natsthecat on Feb 12, 2012 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

But how many games have we won by our perimeter shooting?

I don’t remember to many, their legs are always tired after a back to back and they can’t make their shots. I got new for everybody, our backcourt has not made their shots all year, so why try to change that doing closure because LaMarcus played 52 minutes. That is illogical to me. If he is to tired to play, he shouldn’t be in the game.

hg

by BBK on Feb 13, 2012 6:15 AM PST up reply actions  

But, our shooting % all year throughout the game has been bad

How does the coach think it will dramattically change at closing. We get our points by forcing turn-overs and running out for easy buckets. our mid and long range shots have been off all year except for Aldridge and Thomas. So IMO, those would be the two that should be shooting at the end of the game..

hg

by BBK on Feb 13, 2012 6:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Felton stinks.

That’s where the discussion should start. You can’t AVOID playing through your point guard on a team filled with below average ball handling at every position though. Wes and Nic being poor at feeding the post makes them less likely to play the strong side with Lamarcus and Gerald has a busted up hand.

Of course, Felton sat the first OT and the Blazers got off to a solid start and should have won the period and game but they bricked a few open shots.

Next up, Crawford isn’t a point guard, but was making some plays to get guys open last night. He just can’t do that while maintaining a respectable shooting %.

What to do if you’re Nate? Your point guard stinks, and your only backup isn’t really a point guard.

It’s funny how often the Blazers get criticized for not running plays efficiently when THEY DON’T HAVE BALL HANDLERS WHO CAN RUN PLAYS EFFICIENTLY. It seems obvious to me but…

Come on, let's all hug it out.

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Feb 12, 2012 12:26 PM PST reply actions  

Nate can't be blamed for everything...

Crawford is what he is: a streak shooter. His inconsistency can be tolerated because he’s the kind of player that makes up for off nights with on nights, or hits a big shot in crunch time.

Felton, on the other hand, has GOT TO be more consistent as the team’s PG. He simply isn’t working out. The season’s half over, what more is there to see? The real responsibility/blame from this point on falls on the management. Its time to make a move. They won’t get jack for Felton alone obviously. I think they’d have to package him with either Wes or GW and go after someone like Nash. Parting with GW now seems like the most practical move. That, or convince Nic he can play the 2 and then cut ties with Wes. Imagine if you will a starting five of Nash, Batum, Wallace, Aldridge and Camby. Lights out with Jamal off the bench.

by Slinger81 on Feb 12, 2012 12:58 PM PST reply actions  

I'm not on the hate Nate bandwagon

but I will say the current free agent veterans we picked up in last two seasons are not as coachable as the Brandon Roy teams that were among the youngest, least experienced in the league. I am in favor of a rebuild starting with any trade deadline deals that can bring in unrestricted, top 10 picks. Every player including LaMarcus should be available (though I might keep Batum and E. Williams). An up and coming young team is easier to root for than a dead-end veteran team.

by oregonslee on Feb 12, 2012 1:04 PM PST reply actions  

Aldridge shouldn't be available

For anyone except Howard, or maybe multiple top ten draft picks. And the draft picks only if we get a GM capable of not totally failing in the draft.

"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."

by YoniRap on Feb 12, 2012 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Wowwy Zowwy

…and why not? He’s the most valuable player and he’s worth far more to a contender than to a pretender; and really, I can’t see him wanting to stay on a middling team forever. I bet he’s destined for Dallas, Houston, San Antonio or OKC.

by oregonslee on Feb 12, 2012 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

you mean sometime in the distant future when his extension is up?

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 4:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Worse than the offensive issues

Was Nate’s decision to run Felton/Crawford/Mathews to start the second OT – with Mathews completely unable to handle Delonte West one on one.

Besides the inability to for the guards to hit a jumper in OT – that was the single biggest factor contributing to the loss.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 1:54 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

this was his rationale
"We’ve got guys who are battling with confidence right now,’’ McMillan said. "Like tonight, Nic I thought hesitated on the shot, so let’s get Wesley in. You gotta shoot the ball. So my thing is, it’s really no hesitation to make that substitution if I think you don’t have it, or you can’t get your rhythm, as opposed to earlier (in the season), it was ‘OK. Let them play it out.’ We don’t now. We are going to change. I have to give us the best chance to win.’’

gimme a break. nic absolutely made a mistake there, but you don’t teach him by benching him for wesley. is it me, or does nate always hang nic out to dry in the media?

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Feb 12, 2012 2:00 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Nate isn't getting the best out of this roster.

Any time someone is tentative and you punish him with subbing a player who is playing less effectively it has to hurt. Nic gives you more than scoring. I didn’t understand Felton’s minutes – talk about non productivity? Nic or Felton ?

by Idahoblazerfan on Feb 12, 2012 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

What's dumb is Wes does the same thing,

passes up WIDE OPEN SHOTS, yet somehow he’s allowed to do it and Nate doesn’t do a thing, but Nic passes up 1 NOT WIDE OPEN SHOT (I know what shot Nate is talking about and there was a guy closing on Nic. Yes he could’ve got the shot up, but he made a move & passed to an open teammate, wtf do you want from him?) and gets pulled? I said it the MOMENT Wes started for Nic in 2OT that Nate just lost us the game, and of course Wes’ guy goes on to score 6 straight points. GREAT COACHING NATE! Maybe you can keep going away from Lamarcus when he’s the only person shooting over 50% and keep going to a guard that is 6 for 23. And for anyone saying Crawford is dominating the ball, NATE CALLS EVERY PLAY FROM THE BENCH, SO HE IS CALLING CRAWFORD ISO’S LIKE HE USED TO CALL BROY ISO’S. Problem is Crawford is NOT Brandon, and Nate doesn’t know how else to coach. He had Brandon bail him out of so many situations it has created this false image of Nate as a great crunch-time coach. WRONG! He is an AWFUL crunch-time coach and now without Roy he is finally being exposed. I’ve said this for 3+ years, but no one wants to hear it. This city is filled with Rose-Colored-Glass wearing apologists.

by Blazer_Duck on Feb 12, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

We keep losing close games!

That is not all on the players when we keep ;losing close games. Nate has to face the media and take some fault here and now! We seem to rely on spurts to get us in posiyion to win but we are so predictable that teams know they double down on LA and let someone else beat you. Nate has to devise some new strategy. We also keep going one and out in the playoffs also! Something has to change!!!!

by Idahoblazerfan on Feb 12, 2012 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm

Kind of in awe at how bad Nate really is. He’s consistently wrong about his players. It’s time he has to go.

by Cabbol on Feb 12, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Nate has something against Nick..."this is the NBA"...that one kind of made it obvious.

Nate likes the hard working nose to the grind stone guy who reminds him of himself.
It’s a wonder he liked Roy. It took forever for LMA to gain his trust…LMA said so himself..the Dallas game last year is when he felt he had Nate’s trust.

Not that Batum isn’t a hard worker..he’s just way more talented than Nate ever was..same with LMA..Matthews OTOH, probably reminds him of himself. Not sure why Felton is getting the pass…maybe because he dribbles out the clock like Blake?

by Natsthecat on Feb 12, 2012 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I hadn't seen that quote

McMillan is delusional if he thinks that this rationale justifies his player rotations.

The man is on the record as being clueless.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 4:26 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

To be honest, I can't really get a real read on Nate's feelings on Batum.

On the one hand, and on the surface, it does seem like he’s biased against Nic because he’s not giving him the start when it looks like he should and maybe because Batum’s also a Euro. (Euro’s haven’t connected well with Nate.) However, on the other hand, McMillan has designed two end of game plays for Nic in the last couple of weeks, so that tells me he somewhat trusts his SF to win the game…I don’t know.

by Stryder9 on Feb 12, 2012 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

the notion that Nate thinks Felton on the floor

provides a lineup providing the best chance to win is stunning.
The only rationale I could think of was the ‘Let them play it out’.
Nate, presumably, has some credibility (somewhere) on the line with the Felton fiasco.
Felton is like a close game wrecking ball.

by Berkeley on Feb 12, 2012 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

well I certainly expect so, with no GM

and Nates ‘difficulties’ with Andre. I expect Nate has (or, preferably, had) a strong voice in any roster decisions. The team went to, in my mind, an extreme to trade Andre, considering, they probably passed up Faried as part of the trade. When Camby is out, we need rebounding help, that Faried might have provided. A nice windfall for Denver. This helps explain how Nate has clinged to the hope of Felton ‘showing up’.
I would love to see a ‘heavyweight’ GM come in who can take control, and start with a new coach, as I don’t think Nate is going to stand for any ‘interference’.

by Berkeley on Feb 12, 2012 10:11 PM PST up reply actions  

exactly. Batum on the bench...the Blazers go down by 4..Batum comes back in and

they tie. Perhaps if Batum had STARTED the 2nd overtime the Blazers would not have gone down by 4.

by Natsthecat on Feb 12, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

One thing that has emerged this season

Is a clear separation between Batum and Mathews in the intangibles department.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Feb 12, 2012 4:36 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

God (or Dave): I know it's a no-no to say this, but people who have actually played hoops know there's a good reason you couldn't go to LMA every time in overtime

Namely: FATIGUE! LMA was obviously, and understandably, gassed. What’s remarkable is that, after carrying the team for nearly every minute of regulation, LMA was able to do as much as he did in the overtimes.

At some point, you have to let your big horse rest while someone else gets a bucket. Felton and Crawford did get themselves open looks. They just couldn’t hit them.

I still believe in Greg Oden. The Blazers' medical staff? Not so much.

I'd change my handle to "bringback'09," but I'm too lazy.

by hurryup09 on Feb 12, 2012 2:23 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Portland's Team for next year?
Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm