Game 27 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 94, New Orleans Hornets 86
In a Nutshell
On a night when the New Orleans Hornets wear uniforms as ugly as your great-grandmother's drapes the Blazers oblige them by playing ugly for most of the game before turning on the hustle to edge ahead and take the game. New Orleans has chances but blows them like a 4-23 does.
Game Flow
I'm going to spare you the blow-by-blow in this one in case you have anything on your stomach. Suffice it to say that whatever the Blazers were playing out there tonight, it wasn't basketball. Consider that they shot 52% for the game and they never really experienced horrible droughts. In fact their outside shooters were better than we've seen in a long time. How do you trail one of the worst teams in the league while shooting that well? You don't rebound. You turn over the ball. You lose track of people on defense. The Blazers did all three and more for the better part of three quarters. They'd get three people back in transition when five were needed. They'd cut off the strong side drive with extra men but never rotate on the weak side, leaving Hornets open after a simple pass. They did everything but go inside on offense, getting few easies and drawing no fouls. It was the kind of game that made you want to yell at your TV all night.
Portland rode hot shooting by Jamal Crawford and Raymond Felton plus some great energy from Gerald Wallace to stay in striking distance of the Hornets. Trailing by 9 midway through the third period they turned it on late, courtesy of Crawford's hot hand and Wallace's hustle, exiting that quarter with a 70-67 lead. Then when the Hornets tried to come back Portland suddenly began doing all the things they sloughed off on earlier: rebounding, trapping and forcing turnovers instead of committing them, getting tough on the interior on defense, bothering to pass around the Hornets on offense instead of dishing once and shooting contested. Even so they couldn't get farther than a half-dozen ahead and New Orleans didn't give up, being that close to a rare win. When Al-Farouq Aminu hit an improbable three with 48 seconds remaining the Hornets were within 2. Unfortunately for them they seemed to intentionally foul on the ensuing possession. This is the second time we've seen that strategy under a minute but with another possession left on the clock this season. Maybe somebody who's a coach or expert statistician will explain why you don't just defend and get the ball back for the tie or win. It seems silly to grant near-automatic points when you've rallied to get that close. But the Hornets did, the Blazers hit their free throws, dodged a wide-open Marco Belinelli three, and iced the game from the foul line. Portland emerges victorious, 94-86.
Take-Away Points
Portland's bigs looked S-L-O-W out there tonight. Also one wonders how LaMarcus Aldridge gets only 12 shots in a game that's going this poorly. Yes, the Hornets were swarming him but no worse than every other team the Blazers face. When the team needs him he has to get in position, fight like heck, and then demand the ball. Had Portland's guards not been connecting from the perimeter in near-unprecedented fashion this would have been a loss and the team's best player pretty much would have watched it happen. Maybe the team is still covering for illnesses or something. If not, it's up to Aldridge and his teammates to make him the superstar the Blazers need every night.
Individual Notes
It's not like LaMarcus wasn't connecting when he had the ball. He shot 7-12 for 14 points. He had 7 rebounds...not great against range-challenged opponents. He was around the key tonight but boards were going elsewhere. He had 4 assists. He should have had 8 more shots.
Gerald Wallace once again looked like the only Blazer who gave a darn on defense for much of the game. He was trying to pump up his teammates but they were wet blankets tonight. He hit 6-9 attempts, scoring well at the rim, and had 7 rebounds and 3 blocks.
Marcus Camby had 7 rebounds in 20 minutes. It's hard to blame him for Portland's rebounding woes with that kind of rate. At the same time, he was one of the guys moving like molasses.
Raymond Felton shot wonderfully from the perimeter, at least compared to his norm. He went 6-10 tonight for 18 points and even squared up on the jumper a few times. It's marvelous what a few fundamentals can do. He had 6 assists. Unfortunately he also had 5 turnovers.
Jamal Crawford played the hero off the bench tonight, shooting 10-16, 9-10 from the foul line, for 31 sorely-needed points. Let's put that in perspective. The Blazers only scored 94 in the game. He accounted for 1/3 of Portland's production. It's not like he got lucky with triples either, going only 2-7 from distance. He worked for those points, breaking down the defense and either pulling up or dishing. He also had 8 assists. He looked like he was moving at the speed of light compared to most of his teammates in the halfcourt. He was also the only player who looked like he had a clue, even if that clue was often leading him towards his own shot.
You know how the Eskimos supposedly have 20 different words for snow? The Blazers need 20 different words for how badly Wesley Matthews is playing right now. Other than a couple steals, just don't ask.
Nicolas Batum, on the other hand, found a way to impact the game on a night when he had only 6 shots, connecting on but 2, going 1-4 on his newly-beloved distance shot. He had 5 rebounds, which the Blazers needed, 5 steals, and 2 blocks. Well done.
Kurt Thomas played 14 OK minutes.
Elliot Williams missed 3 shots from the field and 2 from the foul line in 5 minutes, committing 2 fouls and getting 1 assist on a baseline wrap-around pass to Gerald Wallace in the process. That assist didn't outweigh the rest. He didn't see the game again.
Fun With Numbers
- Hornets 14 offensive rebounds and they win the rebounding battle overall on a night when they missed far more shots than did the Blazers. Who was working harder?
- New Orleans 54 points in the paint to Portland's 30. Who was working harder?
- Everything else but the shooting percentage (Portland 51.5%, New Orleans 44%) was pretty close.
Final Thoughts
A road win is a treasure but epic fail for only playing 8 guys (E-Will's 5 minutes doesn't really count) on the first of a road back-to-back when the opponent has a 15% winning percentage and tomorrow's opponent is Dallas. Don't blame Coach McMillan. The starters could have gotten rest by giving more effort early and finishing this instead of playing just good enough not to lose for 44 of 48 minutes.
You can read about New Orleans' hope and/or lack of patience with results like this at At The Hive.
Your Jersey Contest scoreboard and the form for tomorrow's game.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
84 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
kazoo wins are the best.
"If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind."
by thankyouforblaze on Feb 11, 2012 2:50 AM PST up reply actions
Maybe we will get some personell changes
sooner rather than later.
I am liking the way Jamal is stepping up in the midst of the mess.
Make new friend at the AllStar game LMA.
read this on twiiter
Jason Quick @jwquick
Jamal Crawford in the Blazers’ huddle: “Let’s go. We can’t f-&*# around anymore. Let’s go.”
and then later
Jason Quick @jwquick
Since Crawford told the team no more ‘f-ing’ around in timeout, the Blazers went on a 22-10 run
I don't know about anyone else
but I feel weird about tweeting out what’s going on inside huddles. Let them be.
—Dave
sadly,
it’s really only a short distance away from the in-between quarters 10 second coach interview… except there’s usually no cuss words.
I agree… let ’em be.
"Kingdom livin' is a full-time job; every day, I be clockin' in."
by JelaniGNatural on Feb 10, 2012 9:21 PM PST up reply actions
The distance is vast to me
The interview is a public declaration. The huddle has some implication of being behind closed doors even though there are no physical doors. I don’t want the players looking over their shoulders to see who is listening and who might repeat it to the world when they need to say something in the heat of battle, any more than I’d like someone to listen through the vent during a players-only meeting and broadcast that. These guys are held responsible for enough of what they say. When they need to work, let them work and use whatever forms of communication are necessary to get the job done even if they’d not like their words repeated in public.
—Dave
by Dave on Feb 10, 2012 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Maybe
This is part of the thing. You’re probably correct. That’s probably exactly what happened. That’s certainly the impression we’re left with. But what if, say, the whole rest of the lineup heard Jamal and said, “Holy crap. We’re getting called out by the laziest, practice-avoiding, no-defense-playing, ball hog on the team. If this dude is saying we’re not working hard something is really wrong here.”
I am NOT saying that’s the truth, nor am I trying to imply anything about Jamal Crawford and his work habits. But that COULD have been the reaction and the reason for the run. We don’t know, and that’s the point. Now all of a sudden Crawford gets a rep as an inspirational team motivator on the basis of one eavesdropped Tweet that’s not even a part of a full story and has no context.
—Dave
What he said and the way he said it is typical game fodder for anyone trying to inspire a sluggish team
It wouldnt even be considered calling out his teammates but more of a rallying cry.
He didnt say "You cant ’ he said "We cant " typical rallying cry which carries a bit more weight as jamal doesnt seem to be a rah rah guy .
by Willie Beamon on Feb 11, 2012 7:40 AM PST up reply actions
I agree in principle, but disagree in application... sort of
I can’t make up my mind here. I’m agreeing with you mostly, except to say that this is the logical extension of the success of “Behind the Locker Room Door” and the like. The biggest difference is, I’m assuming, Quick was always up front about how/when he was reporting, so as not to jeopardize his access.
I guess what I’m trying to say is, looking at it from JQ’s POV, it makes sense. It doesn’t seem that big a jump to me.
But as a player, yes, I could totally see the difference.
"Kingdom livin' is a full-time job; every day, I be clockin' in."
by JelaniGNatural on Feb 10, 2012 9:53 PM PST up reply actions
In order to do the Locker Room Door
Quick had to be in the locker room. Invited. Players knew they were going to be quoted. Also they weren’t in the middle of a game.
I have no problem if someone wants to write an extended piece on the intimate life of a surgeon. I have no problem if the author gets access to behind the scenes stuff and reports same in the course of that story. I would have a problem if the author were in a corner of the surgery room and tweeted on the spot, “Dr. just said $^%^$ get me a #%^$% scalpel you incompetent nurse!” Some things that happen in surgery need to stay in surgery among the professionals who are performing same.
The same would be true for a piece on me as a pastor. I wouldn’t mind an intimate look. I wouldn’t mind if people found out new things behind the curtain. I’d mind like heck if someone attended a meeting between me and other ministers and tweeted, “Dave is totally bitching about his congregation. Says they’re clueless.” You know what would happen at the next meeting that author was around, even if he was on the same block somewhere? We’d be talking about daffodils and rainbows. We’d not feel comfortable saying an honest word again.
—Dave
We call this 'making the sausage'
At the software company where I work. What we do in internal communication is not customer consumable. If everything we did had to be, it would make us worse at what we do.
I don’t much like it, I agree with Dave that they need the confidence to communicate quickly / clearly without thought that they need to sensor their thoughts as if this is publicly available content.
Tweeting about something that generic doesn't seem like a problem to me
If Quick were tweeting about how they need to trap player X every time he makes move Y then yes, that would be a problem.
put a body on 'em
I hate this kind of stuff.
It all started with ABC Wide World of Sports and their up Close & Personal segments, which carried over into the Olympics, in an attempt to bring in female viewers (who it was assumed were never interested in the pure sport).
All those beginnings are Ancient History now.
ignacio
someone needs to want this
I’m happy they at least realize how terrible they’re playing
lol
Jamal Crawford in the Blazers’ huddle: "Let’s go. We can’t f-&*# around anymore. Let’s go."
in response to:
Nate McMillan over the last twelve games: “Y’all been playin’ like $#!&. Let’s go.”
"If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind."
by thankyouforblaze on Feb 11, 2012 2:54 AM PST up reply actions
Thoughts while watching
Problem with the Blazers now is that every team with a lousy record sees us coming and says, hey, lay it all on the line, we can win this game! Hopefully now that will change.
Wes needs to STOP shooting running J’s. He never, ever, makes them…
My new name for LA. "Mr Clutch"!. (a) as a comment on his inability to perform in the clutch, (b) in hopes that he continues to hear it, then believe it, then achieve it.
Michael Holton: “Home Whites – the equivalent of packing your pillow”. Classic. I think it helped.
Great active defense, no boards Like to see EW in there in the 1st.
They had as many (offensive) rebounds off their missed shots (11) as we did (defensive). That’s just plain inexcusable. "Show me your butts" (Box out, dammit!)
Love Raymond’s response to Clownzano.
We can’t buy a rebound. Why not put in Chris Johnson? What’s he there for if you don’t use him in this game?
You;ve GOT to MAKE your FREE throws!
I’m so trained by the Blazers/OLCC, that I’ll pause the DVR as soon as the third quarter is over, so I can be sure of getting my last beer Anybody else?…
Finally. A road win.
I think LMA took it easy tonight in preparation for his game tomorrow night in DALLAS.
HIS HOME TOWN. He didn’t go into the paint..that’s what wears players out..bumping and grinding. He’s playing many minutes and was sick against Houston..2 days later he said he felt fine but he’s not going to say “I’m still feeling a little bit ill.”…no way.
What was Raymond’s response to Clownzano?
Why not put Chris Johnson in? He’s a foul machine, that’s why.
This Blazer outfit is just not a very good basketball team.
I was glad Nate heard by telepathy and put E.W. in. Too bad E.W. didn’t produce much.
Perhaps it’s time to start Nic at the 2 and not worry about Wes’s feelings. Can’t say he’s deserving to start this year—though Nic has disappeared since his big game.
Felton’s shot seems to be coming around—now if he can just get his decision making and ball handling tightened up to cut down on the senseless turnovers.
by LaughingJon on Feb 10, 2012 9:23 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
The team is 50/50 as to whether they come out and bring the required energy to win
basketball games. The pieces don’t fit, and the organization overall can’t decide what approach to take. There is a mental weakness to this team on the road or in back to backs. As if in the back of their minds they’re already formulating an excuse as to why they can’t win these games.
Nate has done a good job motivating this group in the past, but this season he’s struggled finding the proper rotations and has not been able to consistently get the best out of the players on this roster. He’s having a rough yr in my opinion.
"Mental weakness" is exactly right.
This iswhy I feel justified in pronouncing that “The Blazers are an underdog every game.” Theyare. I didn’t understand where the confidence was coming from here in pre-game threads.
ignacio
I agree to that
if only your screenname was different it would be more credible ;)
by Victor Hugo on Feb 11, 2012 3:04 AM PST via Android app up reply actions
Nic did not disappear tonight. He had
FIVE steals, 2 blocked shots, 5 RB, 2 assists, got to the free throw line and made 4/4 free throws, and was + 17 in this game. He didn’t shoot well but made a HUGE difference while in the game.
Some players actually play defense when their shot isn’t falling.
He made the game changing alley oop to GW to get the lead back and stole the ball with 1:14 left in the game to put the Blazers up by 4 with his free throws, which he cooly made at the end of the game.
That is not exactly DISAPPEARING.
I know it's a side note in a very forgettable game....
but EW, a guard, is 1-7 at the free throw line for the season. I know it’s a small sampling, but come on…. show Nate you are ready for some minutes.
Chicken or the Egg
EW may be 1 for 7 but he gets so few minutes…if he played more then the percentage would improve. Also, Nate puts more pressure on guys because he does not allow rookies to make mistakes. Even though Nate will allow more experienced players to continually suck it up.
by stats al ghul on Feb 10, 2012 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
Free throws are free throws. They have the word "free" right in there
They shouldn’t require a lot of warm up, players practice FT’s for years so they have the muscle memory ready to use at any moment.
You’ve got to make those if you want to prove you belong. Unless you have some other amazing talents that override your inability to hit them.
It’s certainly likely this can be chalked up to “jitters” or a similar concept, but EW’s been a mixed bag in general so far. Similar to how Babbitt is supposed to be a dead-eye shooter but struggles in garbage time.
by Timmay! on Feb 10, 2012 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
free throws are NOTEABLY more difficult when a player is fired up.
I cannot even imagine being a rookie on a team with McMillan as the head coach.
Matthews otoh can just barely show up and no problemo.
It gets old.
We used to run sprints in HS
And after each one the coaches would go down the line and for each and every player, simulate a 1+1 situation. Miss the first, 2 more lines. Make 1, one more line. Make 2, no lines for the team, for that player. We did it for players 1-12.
Point is even player 12 faced pressure at practice to make his free throws. While there may be some credence to the player putting too much pressure on himself, it’s not Nate’s fault that EW missed both FT’s tonight. If he wants minutes he just can’t do something so obv negative in the chances he’s got.
Exactly....
I would expect to see rookie mistakes like turnovers, chucking up too many shots because any second coach is taking you out, and dumb fouls…. but free throws are free throws.
Like Babbitt’s dead eye, I want to see the jump from mid-court over the top of the backboard dunking monster we hear about in practice….
I’m sure he’ll get better than his <15% right now, just disappointing he isn’t taking advantage of the limited minutes thus far.
I shrivel up a little bit
When I see Nate giving “the stare” to whomever blows a play…ooooh.
I went 2-2 in FTs my last rec game.
Seriously, E. Will can’t hit a free throw in trash play?
And yet a few people think he’s the next Westbrook with the hype his athleticism has created.
His ceiling is below where Batum is now, unfortunately.
If he could convert his freebies and open shots, he’d warrant 8 minutes a game.
Man, I’m so envious of the Spurs organization and what they’ve been able to do with K. Leonard and DeJuan Blair, and G. Hill. We can’t even get 3 mins a game on average for one of these guys, least to mention turnover-prone Nolan Smith.
"If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind."
by thankyouforblaze on Feb 11, 2012 3:05 AM PST up reply actions
meh, a road win is a road win, I'm not gonna be to picky at this point
but I, for one, like the Mardi Gras uni’s.
I JUST WANT MY BASKETBALL BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Sean in Vancouver on Feb 10, 2012 10:11 PM PST reply actions
I do blame Nate
Never once do I hear Nate take the blame for what goes wrong in a game. He the leader and he is responsible for what happens on the court.
If the starters are not showing emotion than play the bench who have more incentive to play hard.
I agree that Nate has to bear a healthy amount of responsibility for some of the Blazers issues
Dwight Jaynes had a great column yesterday about the Blazers woes. Yes, it is a players’ league, but Nate is not a good in-game coach (especially on offense), he seldom plays/develops any young guys, and why isn’t Batum getting more minutes, especially with Wes Moneysuck playing like a turdburger most of the time?
I have not been a Nate hater over the years although I’ll readily admit to REALLY hoping we’d change out Nate for Adelman. Even though that ship has sailed, after seeing how this season has gone thusfar I’m of the opinion that a coaching change would be best for the players involved, whomever happens to still be around next year.
Playing from behind to come back and beat NO by single digits does nothing to inspire confidence in any part of the organization for me. If we’re going to me mediocre just go all the way and be terrible so we can at least get a decent draft pick and not fool ourselves about almost being a “contender”.
put a body on 'em
I think the Blazers play to the level of their competition.
I also think that someone..either Nate or that idiot Oseipka or Bernie is not doing their job with teaching such things as how to run a freaking fast break. I think this is pretty basic kind of stuff.
I am glad Crawford called out his teammates. And yes, Quick should not have tweeted that…but Crawford of all people probably gets why he did. Crawford is very media friendly and tweets quite a bit. Maybe he’d be glad to know that MORE people know that the Blazers are barely trying…
Matthews just seems like a huge slug these days. Nate needs to bench his but.
if I'm going to blame him for anything it will be losing the ability to motivate the players
Not really his fault there though. I can here him screaming on the sidelines for them to get it in gear. At some point the players need to decide whether they want to actually listen to him.
If they don’t he’ll get fired. It’s completely up to them though.
It's not like he subs in guys 9-13 when the starters are playing rotten
if he did it would at least give them some motivation.
Would that win us more games? Maybe, maybe not. But if nothing else we would know if we had any talent on our bench and they would get some “practice” time in this non-practice season.
put a body on 'em
it wouldn't
and it would be a nice way to get fired faster if he lost games because of it. He’s on pretty thin ice right now as it is.
well then I hope he and his crew do get fired.
He hires Oseipka who absolutely stinks as a coach in the NBA. He was the Bulls defensive coach under Vinnie Del Negro. And we all know just how good the Bulls were then…they played lazily..hmmm…sound familiar?
A friend of mine who is a huge Bulls fan said when watching a Bulls game where the Bulls were blown out by the Blazers…“they’re just lazy, they have talent.”…all of a sudden Oseipka leave and VOILA…the Bulls can all of a sudden play defense like they care.
Of course Vinnie is a horrible head coach so there is THAT.
But McMillan I am sure picked Oseipka cuz McMillan’s college roommate is….DELNEGRO.
Who CARES whether or not the guy is any GOOD.
And Nate also hires the guy who is his CLONE…Bernie. What can he learn from the guy who TAUGHT him?!!!
Please.
Montey Williams is the guy who got the team to play hard. McMillan gets all of the credit…Now it’s the 2nd year of Oseipka and the players I am sure have TOTALLY tuned that guys annoying voice out…
So I do hope Nate is gone. It’s his own fault for hiring 2 mediocre to poor assistants.
Caleb is the only decent asst. coach left.
And Dan Dickauer? I’ve tuned him out just listening to him on Talking Ball…
I’d love to see Monty come back.
Or get an assistant coach from a good team…Spurs come to mind.
I agree on Monty
I drafted a long post about Nate I deleted only to decide to do it anyway (a few posts up) and one of the things I didn’t get in the second time was maybe picking up Monty if he gets canned for the Hornets record this year. My only concern is whether he is too much of a Nate protege in a bad way. But I think we need a change. Man, I wish they had hired Adelman…..
put a body on 'em
Monty came from San Antonio
His players give their ALL…look at how they played tonight. With most of the starting line up not playing.
Hopefully he didn’t pick up any of Nate’s bad habits.
Monty probably had to go along with whatever Nate wanted or he would have been shown the exit…doubt Nate listened to much of what Monty suggested re: in game substitutions etc…doubt Monty even gave him any.
But Monty is the one who picked on Batum to step it up. I do know that. Monty doesn’t suffer laziness.
And the players listen to him.
Oseipka on the other hand…no way do they listen to him. Have you ever heard him speak??
And Matthews dealt with Sloan..who whipped players into shape.
If they messed around or lazed around..guess what, they got to warm their butts next to him on the bench.
Now Matthews knows this isn’t going to happen…and wonder of wonders, he’s slacking off from what I’ve seen. His offensive game isn’t going, he blows off defense.
Just read a post on the NO site...and you may be right...as I've not followed the NO
Hornets and Monty’s coaching…this was kind of an eye opener..:
Guys, Monty is simply awful when it comes to the offensive end of the floor. Whether it’s specifically him or the guys next to him on the bench, someone isn’t doing us any good. And the most disconcerting thing, is what do we have to look forward to? Where is the light at the end of the tunnel?
“And Nate also hires the guy who is his CLONE…Bernie. What can he learn from the guy who TAUGHT him?!!! "
This is funny. What can you learn from someone who taught you??
"If you type two spaces after a period, you're doing it wrong."
by joelor on Feb 11, 2012 8:15 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Is it over? I kept dozing off and having to replay the DVR. Did we win by 30?
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 10, 2012 10:24 PM PST reply actions
actually
we traded for Jeremy Lin at halftime, and won by 43
I JUST WANT MY BASKETBALL BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Sean in Vancouver on Feb 10, 2012 10:29 PM PST up reply actions
I've been ready to trade Aldridge for Lin forever.
"If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind."
by thankyouforblaze on Feb 11, 2012 3:11 AM PST up reply actions
The Knicks have clamored for Felton back
Trade him for linsanity!
"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."
Well we beat a bum...
Positives to take from the win:
-We won on the road
-Gerald Wallace showed up on the road
-Jamal Crawford and Raymond Felton played good
-We closed out a late semi-close game.
Negatives:
-Wesley continued his suckage on the road, scoring just 4 points.
-Nate is our coach still
-The game was way too close, for comfort against a bum
Batum played well?
My eyes kind of glazed over so I don’t really trust my own impressions this game. But Batum has been imitating Crash in a few ways good and bad the past few games I think.
One thing that I love about Wallace is that when he’s feeling it, that guy’s nickname is one of the most accurate in the league. The problem is, there are a lot of players in the NBA that I think bring a lot more consistent hustle and scrap than he does. Batum seems to have picked up on that and he’s even more inconsistent than he usually is. And that’s saying something. The past two games I’ve been seeing Batum turning his head a lot on defense and getting burned by the consequent cutter. He’ll be slow getting back on transition. He’ll make no effort to get a rebound if there’s any opponent in the area.
Then he’ll turn it on and totally destroy someone on defense possession after possession and kick some butt offensively as well. This isn’t just from game to game. It’s all within any given game. Batum’s my favorite player and his inconsistency has always annoyed me less than I think it did most people because I often felt like he was still playing in the flow of the game and generally trying defensively.
I guess the thing with Batum and this team in general is that I believe this is our best team that we’ve fielded in the past few years (assuming a gimpy Roy and injured Oden). When the team decides to “turn it on” this is by far our best defensive unit. We can win games with that defense. But we check out of games for far too long.
Anyway. I never know how to keep things organized and concise. I guess I thought Batum did play inspired at the end. But so did the whole team. In that infuriating way that makes you holler “why can’t you guys do that for 48 minutes!” every night. Gotta stress again that he’s my favorite player and I might even think he’s our 2nd best player right now. So I probably overrate the guy. I just feel massively disappointed whenever I see an easy backdoor cut on him or lackadaisical hustle back or a really half-hearted rebounding attempt with a smaller player on him (as in, don’t start running back to play D until after he grabs it, but don’t make any attempt to actually go get the ball yourself).
Hrmph.
I appreciate the details you took the time to write and agree with the frustration
Why isn’t this a better team?!?!?
put a body on 'em
5 steals, 2 blocked shots, 5 RB, 4/4 at free throw line, 2 assists (one to gain the lead)
one steal with l:14 minutes left that lead to free throws which he MADE at the end of the game. He was +17 in the game. I say watch his play more closely.
He’s probably aggravated at the crummy coaching and weird way the Blazers run the fast break and don’t bother getting him the ball when he is open.
Matthews on the other hand has been sucking it up pretty good all of the way around. HE was 11 +/. Wonder why….
Yeah like I said. My eyes were glazing over this game.
I’ve just seen a few games in a row where he turns his head and his man gets the easy bucket along with a few other times I see him talking to refs instead of getting back or something like that. Probably coloring my view of the entire game from him.
I will say that the Blazers are getting him the ball when he’s open a lot more now than they did at the beginning of the year. I think the new guards maybe just didn’t know what his skills were coming into the season?
What did surprise me was getting halfway through the 4th and thinking “My god, has Aldridge been on the bench most of this game?” Nope. It was just one of those games.
Thank goodness for Wallace and Crawford tonight.
You know there is a lack of enthusiasm for the Blazers when . . . .
there are only 45 comments on Dave’s game recap three hours after he posted it. And it is an early-evening game.
Dave / Ben – Traffic sure seems down this season . . . .
put a body on 'em
Friday nights are notoriously slow. I get to watch these trends while running gameday threads.
Gameday Threads are always quiet on Friday nights. Plus, the Blazers were playing an uninteresting team, and was only televised locally. So it’s a bit of double-whammy tonight.
But if you want more comments, just look under the recap. My postgame thread has another 122 comments if you’re looking for more opinions.
Or we are just getting tired of repeating ourselves game after game
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Feb 10, 2012 11:45 PM PST up reply actions
People are happy to repeat themselves after a Laker game on ESPN or TNT
A Hornets game at 5pm on CSN? Not so much. At least, that seems to be the case.
I read every recap
But don’t comment that much. Timmay does a nice quick summary and Dave does a great longer summary. Since I don’t have CSN I typically don’t have much to add. I’m usually just following along on my iPhone with play by play. I guess I’m saying I’m still here, hungry for as much Blazer news / analysis as I can get, and really appreciate this site even though I don’t post much.
by aces_dad on Feb 11, 2012 12:16 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs

SAY WHAT?!
"If you can do a half-assed job of anything, you're a one-eyed man in a kingdom of the blind."
by thankyouforblaze on Feb 11, 2012 3:17 AM PST up reply actions
Imagine what would happen if the team was playing well.
We would really crash this funky SBN software.
I have more computer hangs here than anywhere else.
I know
Then again, that’s our gig…probably the thing I’m proudest of about this site besides sending those kids for Blazersedge Night. Whether the team wins 20 or 55, is threatening for the lottery or the playoffs, people seem to want to read and talk here. That’s a feather in our cap…more than the writing, more than the analysis, more than anything we should be proud of the people and the community here.
—Dave
Hopefully that and he partied a bit last night after learning about the All Star game
He deserves it.
put a body on 'em
Magnificent game...........
Two well matched teams, playing with desire and heart. A monumental struggle……..an epic ebb and flow. Titans with other worldly powers, locked in a battle to the finish. Leaders standing close by, shouting words of wisdom to draw upon the courage required for such a feat…………………and to get it all free with your comcast subscription !!!!!!! Life IS good.
We must endeavor to persevere.
Its a meh day to be a blazer
The great start was a pleasant surprise and we all enjoyed riding that wave. But lets be real. This team is barely over 500, they can’t win on the road, and they’re seemingly losing their edge at home.
Is this team capable of going deep in the playoffs? Sure. Will they though? No.
Why wait until next year to make moves that can benefit the team now. I’m really hoping for some action at the TD

by 
































