Turner Broadcasting Issues Lame Statement Over Blazers/Lakers Fiasco
A large contingent of Portland Trail Blazers fans was irate on Thursday night when TNT did not air the first half of Portland's game against the Los Angeles Lakers because an earlier game between the Miami Heat and Atlanta Hawks went into triple-overtime. Because of the exclusivity of TNT's coverage deal, the first 24 minutes of the most anticipated game of the season were lost for good for virtually the entire country.
Mike Tokito of The Oregonian obtained this statement from Turner broadcasting regarding the situation.
-------------------------
A Turner spokesman sent The Oregonian a quote from Christina Miller, senior vice president of strategy, marketing and programming for Turner Sports.
"The Hawks-Heat triple-overtime game was an exciting national telecast," Miller said. "This was not a regional telecast and we would not leave our first game until its conclusion."
Asked if Turner considered making the Blazers-Lakers game available on another Turner network, spokesman Tom Caraccioli said Turner's other networks had commitments to programs they could not break.
-------------------------
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
5 months ago
Ben Golliver
144 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I really feel sorry for Crash and LaMarcus
because they were robbed of some national exposure. TNT could’ve split the coverage by showing the late game on its western affiliates. I mean Wade and LeBron weren’t even playing!!!
WHAT!?
No FRIGGIN’ apology!?
I hate TNT.
./////
(((o)))
../////
by NCBlazerfan on Jan 6, 2012 2:25 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
Christina,
Does this mean we’re getting Chris Paul?
by UtleysHairGel on Jan 6, 2012 2:25 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
Thats BS
its was a good game but poeple in teams local markets want to watch their team it doesnt really matter what other game is on.
by blazinbeav on Jan 6, 2012 2:27 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
What's sad is I watched it all.
Because the LA local broadcast was on. No TNT blackout there.
Jag kom, jag såg, erövrade jag.
TNT
stands for Technically Not even Television
This is a joke.
You would think instead of making excuses about trying to convince people to watch a heat Team without it’s stars playing against the hawks that they would want to try and capture a huge LA / Pdx market. Instead they put everyone thru one of the most exscruiating and terrible OT’s I have ever been forced to watch. Did hawks even score in third OT? That wasnt basketball.
by comptoncory on Jan 6, 2012 2:31 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Honestly...
Did they even read the comments from other media? “thanks Chuck for making this basketball game bearable!”
Learn to schedule and / or adapt like ESPN
by comptoncory on Jan 6, 2012 2:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with schedule change. Change the first game start time, back it up 1 hour
also be flexible with a certain amount of time to start the 2nd game-say up to 15min but no more than that. Or have game 2 on a sister network.
TNT SUCKS! I like the Kenny, Barkley show but this always seems to happen to game 2 on TNT. Then to not even apologize, what gall. How offensive!
I think the league needs to do something about this, because it seems to me like TNT is voiding their contract by not showing game 2. They say they have contractual obligation to show the game 1, well then they must have it to show our game, therefore by not showing our game, they are voiding their contract.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 6, 2012 4:21 PM PST up reply actions
3 letter:
TBS. Seriously, couldn’t they pre empt Walker Texas Ranger or whatever they were rerunning at the time?
Also this was The Lakers, I’m sure they have a fan or two who was mad as well.
"She fell in love with the drummer, another and another"
by Cap'n Crash on Jan 6, 2012 2:33 PM PST via mobile reply actions
they had a local broadcast they could fallback on.
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Jan 6, 2012 2:37 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
LA's announcers were surprisingly unbiased
I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain
Read more: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mark_twain_4.html#ixzz1IE4sPu16
by Tyler Durrden on Jan 6, 2012 6:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Or 5 letters: NBATV
Turner owns that, too, and they were showing some “classic” game from the 90s or something.
I can’t believe she used the word “exciting” to describe the Heat/Hawks overtime. It was more like watching a bed-ridden 95 year old with pneumonia: you know it’s going to end eventually, but it’s excruciating waiting for it to happen.
by superfly05 on Jan 6, 2012 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
As noted elsewhere, Turner does not own NBA TV
It’s leased to them and they run it. But the NBA owns it.
That's hardly a mitigating factor
In fact, without being a contract lawyer, I’d say it makes an even stronger case for why they should use that channel for overflow. It’s the NBA’s product; win-win. I can’t imagine the league itself perceives crappy archive footage of some 90’s game as being superior content on an all-NBA channel to a current, live game of what is really a premiere western conference matchup.
It's often not that simple when it comes to broadcasting agreements
They can’t change them on the fly. Like I noted elsewhere, contingencies should be planned for in advance. I don’t know if NBA TV is an option as a contingency due to the ownership setup.
I'm just saying
There’s only two entities involved here (the NBA and Turner Broadcasting), that should have a common interest: showing fans professional basketball on television. The fact that the NBA and TNT manages to screw it up (repeatedly!) with lawyers and bad planning does not excuse that it is a screw-up.
What other sport has an entire half of a game pre-empted because of the previous game? Why does the west coast game always have to have a late tip-off, why not make Miami/Atlanta go an hour earlier once in a while?
Similarly, I constantly have this conversation with my wife, who is a chronic under-estimator of how long things take. If you never accept the idea that it usually takes longer than 10 minutes to get from Beaverton to NE, you will always be late. Honestly, I’d rather have to listen to Reggie Miller and Charles Barkley fill some post-game minutes than always missing the front end of games on TNT.
Lol seriously
OSU '06
GForce Crash Wallace FTW!
by TyboOSU on Jan 6, 2012 5:50 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Exciting?
Give me a break lady…
by CaptainWhiskey on Jan 6, 2012 2:33 PM PST via mobile reply actions
I call bool poop on this one
Tom Caraccioli said Turner’s other networks had commitments to programs they could not break.
I went over to TBS on accident 7:50…Sienfeld was on …They have an unbreakable commitment to Sienfeld?
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
I mean come on!
What’s the deal with that?
by CaptainWhiskey on Jan 6, 2012 2:35 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 7 recs
NO GAME FOR JOO!!!
Disclaimer: There is a high chance this comment contains sarcasm, so please just chill out, relax, and have a nice l@ker hating day.
on TBS...TBS is for comedies
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
That was on USA, which isn't part of Turner Networks.
TBS apparently had contractual obligations to show nonstop repeats of Seinfeld, Family Guy and King of Queens, according to the schedule yesterday.
Yes...exactly
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
The irony is that Seinfeld would mock scenarios
such as this.
And NBA TV, also owned by Turner...
Was showing a playoff game from 1994. Seriously, they have an unbreakable commitment to a game from 18 years ago?
Technically NBA TV is only leased to (and run by) Turner, but is owned by the NBA
That misconception has come up a lot the last couple days, just wanted to correct it. It’s very possible there are limitations involved when they have that kind of relationship.
Not that they couldn’t work out some kind of deal ahead of time as a contingency. Can’t comment either way there.
"They have an unbreakable commitment to Sienfeld?"
Probably, as Seinfeld makes huge bank in syndication.
"I Am Mine"
Uh,,,no
TBS pays to be able to show Sienfeld,…they are definitely not required to show it at specific times…this I can guarantee you
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
posted the same below
didn’t see green
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
Honey Badger Don't Care!
Now all we need is the rest of the roster to get into "how can everybody help Nicco and Oden" mode. -- Oden Mad, Oden Smash! Sep 29, 2010 7:47 PM
TNT chose to air re-runs of freaking Tyler Perry shows instead of the PDX/LA game
Despicable in every way possible.
http://www.tbs.com/schedule/?selectedDate=1/5/2012&timeZone=0
Way to completely mis-label the complaint
NO ONE is/was suggesting they should cut out on the other game, just that they should have backup avenues (partner stations and/or internet broadband) for showing games that are getting pre-empted.
Or how about this – add an extra 30 minutes in between tipoffs. wouldn’t help in triple OT, but would for a normal game. Or better yet – scrap the double headers and just add another night per week instead.
"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave
by douglast on Jan 6, 2012 2:42 PM PST reply actions 8 recs
+92
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
The streaming solution is a big one
Perhaps there is something obscure in their contract, but I don’t see why they can’t offer it via their streaming site.
I can't even stream other games in my zip code
So the free nba channel was blacked out to my area. Blazer.com is blacked out. Etc..
I’m sad.
" one thing I hate more than a L*ker, is TWO L*kers.... "
If this is supposed to be a response...
…To the fans that are upset, why even bother releasing a statement? You’re basically just saying, “we dont care that you’re mad.” Ridiculous.
"Jumper-free throw-free throw-alley oop-jumper-post move-oh please stop hurting us LaMarcus!" -Dave 2/14/11
by Kroes32 on Jan 6, 2012 2:42 PM PST via mobile reply actions
That's why WCW was doomed on good
Ted Turners stations… he couldn’t adapt to the changing times, you can’t force people to watch things “you” deem is watchable. The Heat/Hawks game left me irate… friggin 3 overtimes, serious? Chuck even said this was a horrible game. I give him props for speaking the truth! People are still hating on the Blazers and will for awhile. Wait til April rolls around and the team is still doing great, we are for sure going to have some band wagoners… including you too John Holinger!
Chuck's real opinion
http://news.yahoo.com/weight-watchers-spokesman-charles-barkley-says-weight-watchers-165839260.html
I know this was brought up in the live thread last night by one of our overseas followers… Focuses mostly on his Weight Watchers scam comments, but has a nice tidbit about the Hawks as well…
So that crapfest was more exciting than the Lakers @ Blazers game?
With Lebron and Wade dressed up in suits and two terrible looking teams playing nothing close to decent basketball? Even the freakin play by play guys just outright said the game was horrible and hard to watch. Chuck started talking about his diet.
Pitforks and torches for me regarding anything TNT…
Ivan Johnson >> than Kobe Bryant
at least as far as TNT is concernced
Dave the prophet called this last night...
I live inside the blackout area without the availability of comcast. I get the privilege of seeing very few games. So I anticipated this game immensely. I wouldn’t be so angry if I could at least see the other games.
Perhaps.
I feel like I’m living in the 80’s as far as game coverage is concerned.
This is enraging.
" one thing I hate more than a L*ker, is TWO L*kers.... "
1. That Hawks-Heat game sucked
2. IT’S TWO THOUSAND AND FREAKING TWELVE, YOU HAVE HUNDREDS OF TECHNOLOGIES AT YOUR DISPOSAL THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED DUAL VIEWING
What a joke of a statement, my respect for TNT just took a big hit
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
it was already hard to respect something that paid reggie miller to talk.
Disclaimer: There is a high chance this comment contains sarcasm, so please just chill out, relax, and have a nice l@ker hating day.
by postup on Jan 6, 2012 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
They could of....
At least had a minimized window on the bottom or some sort of split screen.
by Hoi on Jan 6, 2012 2:48 PM PST via mobile reply actions
"It might distract you from the awesomeness that is the Miami Heat. Don't you want to see more of the Heat? MORE!"
But, but, but . . .
We’ll be seeing less of them in a couple of months, when the Blazer-Heat game is on TNT and that is pre-empted by the Orlando-OKC game.
Oh, wait.
Have you ever watched NFL Red Zone??
They seem to manage showing 5-6-7 games at once and you rarely miss anything . While the NBA is a different cat …split screens and back and forths are eminently do-able
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Agreed about it being the best ever
but it really shows what you can do if you care enough
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Yep, that channel is genius
I really wish they’d just make it a part of the NFL Network on Sundays instead.
Yopu mean like those shopping channels
or the numerous televangist channels.
There is plenty to be cut from without hurting anyone’s feeling.
We interupt tonight’s highlight if age-defying beauty creams on HSC to bring you this pre-empted televising of the Lakers and Blazers…Ahh utopia.
I bet the cable companies make a ton of money off those shopping networks
That’s got to be the only reason they still get prominent placement.
I can confirm this
Those channels rake in the bucks
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Yeah, I just don't get it
Why not split the screen for a while? The only thing I can think of is that there’s less potential time for ads. Are their advertising contracts are that inflexible?
My next strategy ...
After writing letters to both TNT and NBA I intend to make a list of all advertisers during future games on TNT and write my complaints to them. Advertisers seem to listen closer to complaints than arrogant broadcasters.
"Who Shot KP?" - Krang
BEdgers wrote to TNT
and got a response, although it was what I consider arrogant. What response will there be if Blaser Nation sends those same emails to the advertisers?
"Who Shot KP?" - Krang
by Gaz on Jan 6, 2012 2:58 PM PST up reply actions
Like Weight Watchers?
Pretty sure they single-handedly sponsored the entire NBA on TNT broadcast last night.
The bright side?
Doris Burke wasn’t doing the sideline reporting…. Glass half full? :)
by Tomahawk30 on Jan 6, 2012 2:53 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
she's awful
The only real negative to the recent 2k entries. There should be a Doris Burke option in the presentation settings, and it should be defaulted to OFF.
That's for sure...
they should have Chuck be one of the commentators of the game, he could be the brutally honest one who just lays it out lol
Time to adjust my medication?
I must be really out of touch. Because while I can clearly understand Blazer fans frustration and even local medias frustration at being locked out of coverage. I find myself siding with TNT.
As much as I personally don’t like it, I think 2 of their statements absolutely true. #1. Its a national telecast not a regional game. You cut away from the Hawks/Heat game, you upset a greater majority of fans that probably already invested 4 quarters PLUS into the outcome of the game in progress.
#2. Turners other networks had commitments to programming they could not break.
I think with the unexpected and unpredicatable nature of the unfolding of a 3 overtime game, it’s not quite as easy as simply flip a switch and show The Blazer/Laker game on some other venue.
I might be really out of touch or out of step with my fellow Blazer fans, but I’m not surprised nor too upset that TNT stayed with the Hawks/Heat game. If I was an executive charged with the decision of whether to stay with an multiple overtime game OR cut to the start of another game? There is no decision…you stay with the overtime situation.
Sure Blazer/Laker fans got shorted. Given the exclusivity that TNT maintains about broadcast rights..but I’ll admit, from a nationwide, National Broadcast perspective, I wouldn’t expect any other outcome.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on Jan 6, 2012 3:03 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Well ....I think many of us flat out don't believe this one
#2. Turners other networks had commitments to programming they could not break.
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Keep in mind...
the unfolding of an 3 overtime game is immediate and unpredicted. So your asking for some pretty serious on the fly adjustments to be made.
I suppose the unspoken option would be to tape delay The Blazers/Lakers game, starting at the conclusion of the Hawks/Heat game BUT showing the entire contest on tape delay.
But would that make people happy? Or just upset them more?
I don’t know, amongst Blazer fans I feel I can’t win this one…but personally, I’m not so upset.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
the unfolding of an 3 overtime game is immediate and unpredicted.
That’s why you have contingency plans before the season, IMO. ESPN always has ESPN2, among other options, as a backup.
by Timmay! on Jan 6, 2012 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I think the contigency plan....
….simply involves fans awaiting the subsequent game on the docket, whining like little babies and wishing reality was different than it really is….
Come on! You missed a 1/2 of basketball. For this TNT is suppose to create an entire sister network filled with easily pre-empted programing just incase you don’t get your full 48 minutes?
Sorry…I don[’t buy it.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
Well they could create a sister station that shows nothing but old sit coms and movies
oh wait!!
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Turner owns TBS and NBA TV...
Which were showing Seinfeld and a 1994 playoff game, respectively. You’re telling me there’s no way those could be pre-empted?
I honestly believe...
…it’s not as easy as everyone thinks. There are agreements not only concerning the programing itself but also the advertising sold.
I know the gut reaction is “Come On! I’m Missing THE game!” then you channel surf and see a documentary about Prairie Dogs playing on Animal Planet…
But really? We need to move on from this. I think the scenario that a game gets bumped to 1/2 time due to a 3 overtime game, is a relatively rare scenario.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
We miss the first parts of blazer games
nearly every time they are on TNT …they plan badly . ESPN also has sister stations…they never have this issue…that is really the bottom line I think
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Well...
I can’t stop this mob. If this was an old western, I’d be the sherrif with the accused locked in the jail cell, while the mob gathered to string him up.
I can’t win it…
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on Jan 6, 2012 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Well...
…maybe you can’t win because it’s a poor argument. Although this may seem to you like an outsized reaction to a single event, many of us have had simmering anger towards TNT due to having to continually miss the beginning of games due to TNT’s poor capability to plan for sports viewing – especially for those of us on the west coast. They simply don’t seem to care and their arrogant response only backs up that opinion. This particular broadcast was simply the last straw. We see that ESPN can handle these scenarios just fine – why can’t TNT? They’re terrible response tells you what quality of management you are dealing with.
Clarification....
After reading a bit, apparently the channel is technically owned by the NBA, and leased to Turner. But it sounds as if Turner is in charge of all the operations/programming – wouldn’t it still be their call to pre-empt a rerun of an ancient playoff game for something that people actually want to watch?
again, no one was suggesting a cutaway.
alternate avenues of delivery, be it internet, partner stations, or split screen.
"But if Ding Dongs and prime rib were the path to NBA pivot stardom we'd all be wearing the uniform." -Dave
maybe start the ticker tape update before the 1st quarter had ended.
it wasn’t unitl overtime that the ticker started. There’s no excuse for that.
yes and no...
I agree that they couldn’t be expected to dump a tight game in progress (no matter how excruciating it is to watch). Unless it is a game that is completely out of hand early, they never do that. However, it seems to me that most people are upset that Turner doesn’t ever have any kind of contingency plan for alternate covereage. Even had the game ended in regulation we would have missed the first half hour or so of the Blazers / L*kers. And it isn’t the first time. I think the Heat / Hawks game wouldn’t have been the “exciting national telecast” they think it was if people had the option to switch over to a better game. There’s nothing exciting about watching the Hawks do everything they can (again) to give a game away.
That's not even addressed
I honestly don’t have a problem with them not cutting away. I’d be furious if they cut away from the OT of a Blazers game so that they could show even more Kobe Bryant.
However, scheduling the games so that they intentionally overlap even when they end in regulation is a problem that can be solved without any modern technology or sister networks, or picture in picture or magic at all. Just schedule so that you can show both games.
And it’s not like OT is unforeseeable.
NBATV is the solution
No one is expecting them to abandon an OT game (that essentially would be inflicting the same harm on another fan base). Turner should simply have a plan in place for when both games overlap which does happen quite frequently.
The simplest solution, in my opinion, is to broadcast the second game on NBATV until the first game concludes. NBATV never carries a game in opposition to TNT on Thursdays and when they do broadcast a game they always carry a local feed, so it clearly can be done.
The basic argument is TNT has far too long stuck to their status quo and cut the beginning of the west coast game.
by Gaucho Alum on Jan 6, 2012 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Just give us a box in the upper right corner
Is that too much to ask? Not like it isn’t 20 year old technology. By the third overtime there were probably more Blazers fans watching that terrible game than Hawks and Heat fans. Most people probably watch Heat games for Lebron and Wade anyway and I’m not sure a Hawks fan could watch their team suck so bad.
It would be as easy as flipping a switch if they set themselves up to do so before-hand.
"She turned me into a newt!
A newt?
...I got better."
So where was the commitment to our game?
if they’re so hung up on not breaking their commitments, why is it so easy to break ours?
#52
by bustabucket on Jan 6, 2012 3:14 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
It should have been online
TNT made the Heat – Hawks game available online. But the Blazer – Laker game was not available even after the Heat – Hawks was over. They should have made both games available online.
THE Poobah of Prognostication 2008
by CBASS on Jan 6, 2012 3:14 PM PST reply actions 6 recs
"lame" is an understatement
BE is a family-friendly website.
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
What they said: Turner's other networks had commitments to programs they could not break.
What I heard: We are incompetent jackasses.
TNT = Dirtbags.
My ban = worth it. Though I won’t be repeating it again, Timmay :p
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
The only thing I could do personally was turn TNT off on my TV.
We on the west coast get disrepected all the time from those on the east coast
Is it unfathomable that the east coast start their games at 6pm
God knows we west coasters have to endure 4pm start time when playing back east. Maybe moiving a game up a hour for the East coast would be so hard after all. Or maybe we could make west coast fans wait until 9pm for their games to start.
In fairness
Atlanta is so horribly sprawled and mal-designed that driving anywhere takes 2.5 hours. So starting a game early there would be particularly problematic. Though it would give people an excuse to leave their 9-5 a bit early.
i'm on the east coast AND was also disrespected by not being able to see the first half.
Not all east coasters root for east coast teams.
#52
The 3-OT aspect....
…ignores the fact that even if the game had ended in regulation, They had no hope of getting to the start of the second game on time.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
by BmoreBlazer on Jan 6, 2012 3:46 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Christina bina bo bina bananna fanna fo finna fe fi mo mina....
Christina! You suck.
and now acting like I’m 8. Thanks TNT.
While y'all are here...
Last season the Blazers streamed KGW games for free to all of Portland on their web site. Do they still do that this year? Or is there a fee now?
(Just working on the GDT broadcast info)
TNT's next NBA contract
ought to have a performance clause. For every minute of playing time not broadcast, TNT will pay the NBA $100K, at least, per minute time penalty. Perhaps the penalty funds could to be allocated to teams with lost viewing time?
I’m inclined to agree with Krang on last night’s game, but suggest David call Ted and let him know that the current contract won’t be adequate next time and that any further missed minutes will be factored in the next negotiation.
I’m so happy that I can watch the streamed games now thank’s to Blazer.com … the OKC game was the first I watched guilt free on my computer. It is great to have that option in a small town that has a cable company that can’t afford comcast.
How hard is it to say "We're sorry"?
You’re not even saying it some intern types it.
by neutroticblazerfan on Jan 6, 2012 4:48 PM PST reply actions
If Paul Allen was forced to watch his team on TNT
this problem would be solved over a decade ago.
by NWfan on Jan 6, 2012 4:52 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
someone please post the home and cell # for Ted Turner
And some of his corporate peeps. Let’s take it to the top!
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
by Blzr fan on Jan 6, 2012 5:33 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Turner can go ....yeah you know the rest
Im gonna try boycott them now. Except for Conan. I hate how they are acting like it is not a big deal. Hogging Nba games to themselves and leaving us with no other option.
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
If I never watch any of their programming (except blazers) anyway...
…does that count as joining your boycott.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
i suppose. If your mad at them for acting like that after keeping us deprived then
go for it. I dont wanna bring down Conan’s ratings cause I like the dude.
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
I follow a lot of people on twitter, not just PDX people..
and not a single one of them wanted to watch that Hawks-Heat game, let alone 3 overtimes. It was not exciting, and people just wanted it to be over with. That’s a BS statement and that’s a ridiculous way to handle it.
Trade John Canzano
here is proof that no one cared about the Heat-Hawks game last night
Did anyone notice all the empty seats in the arena?
If they can’t get butts in the seats (can I say that, BE?), why should anyone want to see them on TV?
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
by Blzr fan on Jan 6, 2012 7:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Would it be so hard for TNT to replay the game this weekend as an apology?
I record all the games and save them to watch in the offseason. Now I’m missing the first half of a game in my collection. I’m suffering from imperfect collection syndrome! I must acquire the first half, haha!
That was my biggest frustration
ESPN replays games. Comcast replays the games. The first half of this game will never air. If they didn’t have exclusive rights to the game I wouldn’t care. I would watch the local broadcast over them anyway.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

































