Solid Trade idea for the futre!
Hopefully i did the link write, the trade is the following if the link doesn't work. It between PDX, HOU and IND
Blazers get: granger and hibbert from IND and then budinger and flynn from HOU
HOU gets: nic and camby
IND gets: wallace, thatbeet and then patterson
Now obviously the i can how most say we give up BOTH nic and gerald but granger is an All-star and budinger is stater in this league so he can be a great bench guy. Also its not really hard to tell who lost-houston but they get nic, and we would have to take on flynns contract to make it work and IND gets Gerald and some solid bigs ( if thabeet acutally becomes ok) Just one idea and not necessarily the best either. Share your thoughts!!
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7yyc5lt
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Spurs might not do it, but it could be done not like most of the trades that get posted
by Daddygr33nJeans on Jan 29, 2012 3:56 PM PST reply actions
WOW
all three teams are losers in that deal
thats why it works
if you make a trade and one team is winning 50 or more games its a lopsided trade. this trade gives everyone something they need but each team loses something key.
by Daddygr33nJeans on Jan 29, 2012 6:15 PM PST up reply actions
It gives us nothing we need and trades our starting guards for bums and trash
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
I wouldn't call them bums, some are fillers
CJ Watson is the the Mo Williams that can pass the ball. He is a very underrated PG that I feel is better then what we have. Then there’s trade Wes which I know isn’t ideal but Batum plays better in that lineup and Danny Green has turn in to a very good player for the spurs. Korver and Bonner are just fillers but they are both upgrades over Chris Johnson and Babbitt. that trade gives as a Underrated PG of the Future and some shooting that that we desperately need.
by Daddygr33nJeans on Jan 29, 2012 10:41 PM PST up reply actions
yeah it's not horrible for us at all really
I don’t know how C.J.‘s done with increased minutes, but there’s a decent chance it’d be better than felton by a lot. I don’t know why the spurs or bulls do this though.
"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."
As a rule of thumb you want to end up with the best player in a trade.
In this trade I think the Blazers give up the two best players.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 30, 2012 1:10 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
not necessarily the rule. I think we can all say denver won the melo trade
even with that, we’re trading our flop of a PG and our decent starting 2 guard for a 3-point sniper in kyle korver, a solid back-up PG who’s done well when he got starting minutes, another 3 point sniper in matt bonner, and a a young SG with a bunch of potential who nearly won a game for the spurs twice last night.
"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."
Look at the numbers
CJ Watson in 36 minutes he has crazy good production. 18 pts 7.2ast/2.6tov (2.77/1). He is shooting 486% from 3.
by Daddygr33nJeans on Jan 30, 2012 10:39 AM PST up reply actions
Kyle Kover would be nice
we do need better shooters.
Indiana guts their future for an expiring Gerald Wallace, the definition of "draft bust", and a mid-first-round PF?
“Dear Indy, we’d like your best young players. Please take an expiring Crash plus table scraps. It’ll help you rebuild now that you’ve traded your best players. All the best! Paul.”
by Timmay! on Jan 29, 2012 3:58 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
Wallace does not have an expiring contract, he has an opt out class that i believe he says that he will not use.
Kenneth Lewis Moore
by lightskin350 on Jan 29, 2012 10:38 PM PST up reply actions
Indiana doesn't do it, but I like the idea.
I think we could give Flynn a shot because he is high character, good demeanor, and was a top 6 pick just two years ago, so he is young and obviously is filled with talent. I could see him developing into a Ty Lawson type player if he is coached up correctly (that, however, is a VERY optimistic view of Flynn, almost unrealistic).
Batum Shakalaka
in case u have not noticed....felton is playing horrible and leading the team in TO.
Kenneth Lewis Moore
by lightskin350 on Jan 29, 2012 10:36 PM PST up reply actions
Incase you have not noticed
Flynn IS horrible.
by AR-15 on Jan 30, 2012 12:02 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
i get it
it was just a idea, and yes i doubt that IND would do it, though i do think that not all teams lose.. from our side we do get a nice package of players
I think the word "Solid"
was a poor choice of word.
HAHAHA funniest thing i actually did this on 2k12
but it was Babs, Wallace, and Oden for Granger and Hibbert.
If we wanted to we could throw a ton of money at Hibbert in the off-season but it would probably take like DeAndre Jordan money for the Pacer not to match. We under the cap enough that we could swing it tho.
Did this same trade too!
Except I sent Granger to GSW for Ellis. Honestly, that team’s the bomb.
"Brandon Roy has done this before."
nice!
well i guess if it works in 2k12 it should work the real world!
this trade makes no sense what so ever...its comical.
Kenneth Lewis Moore
at least the trade makes more sense than the syntax and spelling
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Jan 29, 2012 10:45 PM PST up reply actions

by 






























