Rob Mahoney writes on the New York Times' Off The Dribble blog that the Portland Trail Blazers' failure to extend forward Nicolas Batum gets extra scrutiny because of the many roster pieces that could move this summer...
-----------------------------
Batum’s impending restricted free agency wouldn’t be getting as much attention if not for the possibility that Portland might also lose its other combo forward. Gerald Wallace and his representatives made it clear that he wanted no part of a contract extension because of the limitations of the new collective bargaining agreement, seemingly ensuring that Wallace will turn down his $9.5 million player option for the 2012-13 season in order to test the open market for a longer deal.

Regardless, Portland seems to be a great fit for Wallace, and most reports indicate that there is mutual interest from both parties in keeping him there.

The chaos of free agency, however, will undoubtedly test the strength of that interest; Wallace is sure to receive some attractive offers from teams in need of his slashing, rebounding and defensive intensity, and the choice of where to play will be his alone. The Blazers can still offer Wallace a longer, more lucrative deal than any other team, but will they dig deep into their pockets for a player dependent on athleticism and energy as he enters his 30s? And once Wallace has the freedom to choose from a handful of potential landing spots, will Portland’s offer be enough to retain him?
-----------------------------

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter