Game 19 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 93, Golden State Warriors 101
In a Nutshell
The Blazers blast the Warriors with offensive rebounds while the Warriors slice the Blazers repeatedly from the three-point line. In a game that came down to a fourth-period struggle the Blazers don't have the legs to play to their strengths and the Warriors roll to the victory.
Game Flow
The course of this game became apparent as soon as both teams got their sea legs under them. The Blazers used LaMarcus Aldridge to draw in defenders. If he didn't take the shot himself he found the open shooter. If that shooter missed Portland jammed the lane for offensive rebounds. It worked. The Warriors either surrendered clean looks or got abused on the boards for putbacks. Plenty of Warrior turnovers didn't help their cause. Portland streaked to an early lead. Golden State responded with a little bit of David Lee before they figured out that the Blazers could compensate for him better than they could compensate for Aldridge. Then they went to their real strength, distance shooting. The second half of the opening period featured Stephen Curry and Brandon Rush putting on a jump-shooting clinic. They scored 12 points in the last 3:20 of the frame, bringing the Warriors back to 26-24, having trailed by 10 before the rush.
The Blazers made liberal use of their bench in the second period. Cancel the Aldridge moves and pencil in Craig Smith bulling his way to the hoop repeatedly. Salt in a bunch of Jamal Crawford shots and you get the idea on offense. Defensively, though, the bench players couldn't watch the inside and the Warriors began getting easy shots, their first four makes of the period being layups or dunks. Fortunately Portland's offense returned to more reliable plays, taking advantage of a returning Aldridge and an active Nicolas Batum. The Warriors didn't have the defensive chops to contain either. On the other hand the Blazers, now sagging on defense to stop those point-blank shots, allowed plenty of open looks on the perimeter...gift certificates which the Warriors were only too happy to cash out. When the dust settled Portland's dynamic duo had outscored the Golden State perimeter ensemble, but barely. Portland led by 5, 53-48, at the half.
That's when the Warriors went buck-naked-wearing-cabbage-on-your-head crazy from the three point arc. In the first 6 minutes of the third period Golden State hit 5 of 6 threes, adding a layup and a free throw for good measure. Portland hit a couple threes of their own plus some assorted shots but you knew when the Blazers needed those threes to fall they were in trouble. The game was tied as Portland called a timeout halfway through the quarter. The Blazers would make only 2 shots and 2 free throws the rest of the period. Those Portland shots were both threes, which was good, but also see what we just said about needing them to stay afloat. Golden State, meanwhile, also made 2 more threes plus a couple of dunks plus a couple of jumpers. Gone was Portland's offensive rebounding advantage. Gone was any rebounding advantage because the Warriors just weren't missing. Gone also were the turnovers. This was becoming a jump-shooting contest and Golden State was winning. 79-73 Warriors after three, an 11-point turn-around.
To their credit the Blazers didn't just mail in the fourth period. They tried to return to the inside game. They tried to play smart defense. But the legs just weren't there. Now Portland was committing turnovers instead of the Warriors. Now the Warriors were getting offensive rebounds instead of the Blazers. Portland covered four opponents adequately but there was always a fifth open, mostly David Lee. Portland drew fouls while Aldridge and Batum tried to reprise their second-quarter heroics but the cracks were too wide. As the game wound down the Blazers were reduced to shooting long and forcing passes past a swarming defense just to get close. Misses and turnovers were the results. The game, though hard-fought and better than many expected, ended with a whimper. Golden State wins 101-93.
Take-Away Points
Full marks to the Blazers for playing well under the circumstances. In no sense was this an ugly game. The Blazers were not defeated at any time before the closing moments. The victory would have been nice and should have been there based on team talent alone but given the circumstances this was a good game.
Though Monta Ellis had a muted night by his former statistical standards I actually like what he's done with his game. He had but 4 points but coupled them with 12 assists and 3 steals, looking far more point-guard-ish than I've ever seen him.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge was quietly brilliant but brilliant nonetheless throughout this game. He kept pressure on the Warriors defense and found the right men at the right time. He ended up 7-17 for 18 points plus 7 rebounds and 5 assists. Give him a little more rest and he probably would have had 25 in this game even though the Warriors constantly doubled him in the post. His face-up look was classic LaMarcus tonight.
Gerald Wallace looked a little dead-eyed (and not in the good shooting sense) as the game started. He had a few shining moments on defense but this wasn't one of his big impact nights. 3-9 shooting, 6 rebounds, 3 assists. We know he's going to have up and down nights. That's the character of his game and the team around him. But on night like this a little more "up" would be nice. That said...third game in three nights, finger injury.
Marcus Camby just made mincemeat of the Warriors on the interior. I wish this dude were five years younger because he could have baked them in a pie and served them a la mode too. 16 rebounds and a total "Don't even think about coming into my house" attitude in 24 minutes.
Raymond Felton shot 2-10, 1-4 from distance with 7 assists and 4 personal fouls. The Warriors didn't really test his defense against the drive which helped him. He's still getting screened off a little too easily but I like his effort on that end of the floor better than I did early in the season. As with last night, the numbers are not good but that isn't what killed the team. He's not dominating the action or the ball enough to scuttle things nowadays...a good development.
Wesley Matthews had an inverted night from Felton. He actually shot 5-9 for 15 points and hit 3-4 from the arc. Those threes were nice too...standing still and squared up. (That's a trick Felton hasn't mastered yet, by the way, even when he has time. A little squaring would go a long way towards helping his jumper.) BUT...this was one of those games when Matthews' performance everywhere else seemed anemic. Nothing special on defense, nothing special passing, few moments when you noticed he was on the court at all really unless and until he hit those threes. I love Wesley Matthews on his all-around nights. I'm beginning to dislike Wesley Matthews the scorer.
Jamal Crawford hit 4 threes to save himself tonight but that barely brought him to respectability and even then he went 4-10 from distance. I'm not sure any Blazer should be lofting 10 three-pointers in a game, let alone against the Warriors. You, sir, are not Steph Curry. In fact Curry only shot 8 and hit 6 of them. And that's 8 three-pointers out of 19 shots. Crawford attempted 10 three-pointers out of 14 shots. He had 16 points off the bench. Obviously the Blazers needed them but they come with an asterisk. You wonder if those shots could have been distributed more efficiently.
Nicolas Batum got his 16 points proper, on 5-8 shooting with a ton of energy plus he punished the Warriors on the defensive end too. He had 2 blocks and had the Warriors looking over their shoulders in fear on every break-away layup he even half chased. He only had 3 rebounds but then again his defensive duties involved chasing and staying near perimeter players tonight. This was a good game from Nicolas...far superior to his last two.
Craig Smith had 9 points and 6 rebounds in 14 minutes, as usual bulling his way into the post for his makes. He's a wrecking crew. The only critique is the same one I've been offering: opponents are starting to know he's going to take the shot every time he catches it. He's having a tougher time getting clear looks as they collapse and they're starting to block his shots. That will get worse if the routine stays predictable.
Kurt Thomas registered his usual 16 minutes. He only had 1 rebound but he also played when the Warriors were hitting jumpers.
Nolan Smith played 5 minutes without incident.
Fun With Numbers
- Portland shot a wonderful (for them) 8-21 from the arc tonight for 38%. Then again the Warriors shot 11-20 for 55%. It's like giving a nice little performance for American Idol and then having Frank Sinatra take the stage after you.
- The Blazers also shot only 41% while the Warriors fired at 51%, making 7 more field goals total.
- The Blazers did amass a 17-8 lead in made free throws and garnered 12 offensive rebounds to the Warriors' 5. The Blazers forced only 11 turnovers though, committing 12 themselves. Together it wasn't enough to overcome the difference.
- Points in the paint were even at 30. Think maybe Portland didn't get inside enough?
Final Thoughts
Well, this brutal stretch of long road trip plus three-games-in-three-nights is finally over. The Blazers escaped with a respectable, though not brilliant, 11-8 record overall. They didn't excel but they didn't implode. They have only 2 games in the next 6 days. Let's hope they can rest up and post 3-4 wins before the schedule gets nasty again.
Golden State Of Mind will describe the amazingocity of Stephen Curry.
Trail Blazers vs Warriors boxscore
Find your Jersey Contest scoreboard here and the form for Friday's Phoenix game here.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As you said
last game of a BBB. Won’t be the worst loss of the season. Won’t even be in the bottom 20.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
yeah especially with having such a good game...
and also crash being suspect on the road.
That's exactly what I'm trying to figure out.
Any reasonable explanation why Batum played only 23 minutes?He was an active, aggressive and fresh. And this was the third of back-to-back-to-back games.
If under these circumstances, he gets so little playing time ….
Nate kills his development.
The only reason for his progress is his participation in the French national team.
Then he came to Portland and his coach treated him as a rookie.
Nic has worked hard enough and has shown enough skill to earn a shot.
Either as a 30-35mpg 6th man or a starter at the 3. I’m starting to feel like his shot may come elsewhere. I honestly still can’t tell whether he’ll make good in the NBA, but it’s frustrating that Nate doesn’t seem to want to find out.
by BaylessFace on Jan 25, 2012 11:41 PM PST up reply actions
Why isn't Batum at least backing up the 2 position?
He can guard 2s, and he could play the same offensive game he is now except maybe also post up the shorter players guarding him.
Im very close to giving up on Felton.
If he doesnt hit outside shot then he truly is an extreme downgrade to Andre Miller. Miller was atleast very clever and more efficient in his offense even though he had no outside shot. But felton is advertised as having the outside shot but yet to see it be a consistant threat
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
nate has been soft on felton...
time for sarge to get his pg under control.
Felton was worse against Memphis IMO. Today he and Batum were the only two to have a positive plus minus. Not really sure that makes up for his crappy shooting today, but at least he had seven dimes and a single turnover.
The more and more I see Felton the more and more I can care less if he comes back.
i disagree about wes' passing not being special tonight...
his assist to LA was a thing of beauty after he driving through traffic into the middle of the lane.
I believe you're thinking of the bullet to Batum
In the 2nd half, Which resulted in an and-one. LMA is prob the only other Blazer who would catch that pass.
You may be going too easy on Felton.
It’s starting to look like the word is out to help off of Felly. Turn your head on Dre, and he just might make a smart cut and score. Turn your head on Felton, and he’ll still be right there at the top of the circle waiting to brick a three or bounce the ball wildly down the lane.
If he can’t keep his man honest, he just can’t be on the floor. Well, except we don’t have a backup PG, really.
GS announcers begging the Warriors to let him shoot
squandering 10+ possessions per game on misses and turn overs is killing us
Coming into the game, Felton had the 2nd worst 3P% among starting PGs
Only Tony Parker has been worse, but he’s only taken 12.
by BaylessFace on Jan 25, 2012 11:33 PM PST up reply actions
BTW, what was up with Nate Robinson?
He made a Hitler moustache with his left hand and a Nazi salute with his right hand just before the start of the game. It was on the Golden State broadcast. What the heck was that for?
Dead legs.
And the Warriors looked better than their record. Maybe when Mark Jackson isn’t making idiotic statements to the press he can actually coach? Maybe you have to keep Batum angry to get a good aggressive game out of him. Felton’s shot isn’t falling yet? If this is how he plays in a contract year he’s one and done in Portland.
The old G. Wall road no show again
Shot 33 percent, scored 6 points against a team that doesn’t play any defense.
Crawful killed us with another crappy shooting game, although he hit a decent amount of 3’s, but the real problem was his 6 lousy turnovers which included two in a row and three total turnovers right near the end of the 3rd quarter. They were killers.
Can’t believe we lost to these bums and let them get their first win against a Western Conference team.
GS screen game buried us
All those open looks were coming off screens (some of them moving) but damn, GS executed.
No shame in this loss, other than not playing Batum enough and not TRAPPING Curry earlier around the 4 minute mark. We started trapping way too late in the game to comeback.
by JMLakaShotCaller on Jan 25, 2012 11:43 PM PST via mobile reply actions
twitter wars!
@JCrossover
Haa.some of these writers kill me, 8 diff tweets about our “gaurd” play.every1 can tell u how 2 do it that’s never done it!!!
@jwquick
@JCrossover If I dish, I have to take. But has nothing to do w/having “done it” before. Have to be honest with readers about what going on
PHILLY!
Crap, that JC is listening to the media is a horrible thing
Sounds like they are in his head. A lot of times that leads to trying to prove you are right more than playing right. JC playing right is a matter of getting used to new surroundings/players. It wasn’t immediate in Atlanta and will take awhile here.
Trust and look for each other
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 26, 2012 7:25 AM PST up reply actions
Anyone remember the infamous rejected trade for CP3 because we wouldn't part with Batum?
Today, we rejected paying Batum enough to extend him while we pay Felton $7.6M.
Yeah, yeah, I know we will match Batum’s offer sheet this summer while we are looking for the next Blazer PG. We still value him enough we didn’t want to extend him now so we could trade him before the deadline or this summer.
Rather than trade Wallace, Wallace will play out this year before he walks away this summer, and Batum will keep averaging 24 minutes a game (22 minutes tonight, 16 pts, 5-8 shooting) because there aren’t enough minutes for both. Meanwhile. Felton will play out his contract here this year while shooting 3’s at a 20%-25% clip and throwing passes at LaMarcus’s knees, while some old washed-up PG in Phoenix, that has no chance of making the playoffs this year, shoots 54% FG% on the season, 38% on 3’s, averages 10.4 assists per game, and probably wonders what it would be like to play with Amare Aldridge again for another season or two before he retires. But we need two 2 SF’s so no point in making phone calls.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 26, 2012 12:02 AM PST reply actions
I have to agree.
It would be nice to see this franchise take a chance one way or the other. I’m am tired of standing still waiting for everything to coalesce perfectly. Even if we strike out, at least we won’t have our hands tied with decisions like Batum, for which one way there are only modest gains to be had, and the other only a modest feeling of regret should he reach his potential elsewhere.
by SabasTheHut on Jan 26, 2012 12:15 AM PST up reply actions
I have to Disagree with Dave's assessment of Crawford tonight...
The only decent part of his game were those threes. Anybody who is hitting at a 40% clip and continues to hit at that clip is welcome to take as many threes as he pleases, especially on this team. We need our guards to take them and make them to open up the floor for Aldridge and Wallace and keep the opposing defense honest.
On the other hand, pretty much every time he put the ball on the floor or made a pass off the dribble he came up empty and the Warriors went running. That and his defense were frustrating me tonight.
If they were open catch n shoot shots
It would be one thing. At least 2 and perhaps 3 were of the trying to draw a foul variety, which isn’t flying this year with the no jumping into defender foul clarification.
I know and I don't really like it
I wish the guards (and obv him) would repost LMA when he passes out. It seemingly never happens.
I was looking at BREF and saw that Crawford had the 9th highest usage rate this year, with poor efficency rates. It’s almost unbelievalbe that Nate would allow this type of player on his team.
That's 9th highest in the entire NBA
The leaders as you expect are Kobe, Lebron, etc. LMA was 15th BTW which I was happy to see.
whaaaaaaaa
That’s pretty shocking, and not a recipe for success. I like Crawford but his ball handling/usage rates should be WAY lower. Nate must force feed Nolan Smith into the game NOW. He may only have the upside of Chris Duhon, but if that forces Crawford off the ball into what his role should ideally be thats fine. He might be a decent 3 point shooter in the NBA with time, although he’ll never be much of a distributor.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Interesting tone Jamaal versus Batum in various comments on this site
I like them both. The line on Batum is “Play him more and develop him”. I’d Love to see him earn more minutes BTW.
Then there is the “Bench Crawford” comments.
Both have skill and Crawfords is proven. Both would benefit from more time to get into a flow and rhythm. Jamaal took time to get used to Atlanta, the player and sixth man role. The one is giving him a bit of trouble. But I feel he has the skills to fill in there.
Actually, Felton is getting more consistent. His shot will come around. Again, it takes playing time to get those legs in shape.
So, basically I see an irony. The same reasons for playing Batum more aren’t being extended to Crawford and Felton..
I also feel this team will come on strong second half. I have said before, the odds of Wes, Raymond, Nic and Jamaal all not able to hit shots on a given night are really low. I think it is a combination of legs and comfort level. Comfort level should come around
Trust and look for each other
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 26, 2012 7:37 AM PST reply actions
Actually, Felton is getting more consistent. His shot will come around. Again, it takes playing time to get those legs in shape.
Ummm, are we watching the same games here? There’s no consistency whatsoever in his game right now.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Felton is only getting consistently bad.
Tell me again why we traded Miller?
by RenoBlazerFan on Jan 26, 2012 9:06 AM PST up reply actions
His 09-10 campaign which won 6th man
Was his career year, and well above all other performance metrics. Even in that year his usage was more than 10% less than this year, and, that is his second highest usage of his career. In his career his usage is usage is more like 20% less than this year. His performance stats this year are well below his averages, and in some cases, the worst marks of his career..
So, you have a guy near career worst performance metrics, shooting at career highest rates. It’s going to get people’s attention.
I usually don't get in the debate of usage of players
That is because I am not that skilled at BB. In this case I will have to agree that usage of players that is scoring opposed to players on favorites list seems bad, I like Crawford’s ability to create, I like his ability to make buckets, but I don’t like his game. As Dave said, when he is in the game he is the whole offense, and that doesn’t satisfy my want for team play. Is it my imagination or is it a fact, when Crawford takes all those 3’s and misses that the opponents gets an easy bucket at the other end. It seems to me if he misses more shots then he makes that he is giving up more points then he is making. Whereas Batum is not a flashy player and doesn’t have that fantastic cross-over he does a lot more for the team play then Crawford.
hg
Dave said:
Raymond Felton shot 2-10, 1-4 from distance with 7 assists and 4 personal fouls. The Warriors didn’t really test his defense against the drive which helped him. He’s still getting screened off a little too easily but I like his effort on that end of the floor better than I did early in the season. As with last night, the numbers are not good but that isn’t what killed the team. He’s not dominating the action or the ball enough to scuttle things nowadays…a good development.
I’m sorry Dave, I cannot agree. Actually, I can agree with “he’s not dominating the action” part but that’s about it. I saw some pretty terrible D on Curry a few times, where he shed Felton off like a cheap suit for an open jumper. Felton also gets destroyed on most picks despite his strong body, whereas Miller used his strength to fight through picks and stay with his man most of the time. And when exactly was Felton ever covering the 3-point line?
When is Felton getting assists on anything other then perimeter swing passes? Just occasionally from what I’ve seen. And the sad part is we’re nearly 30% through the season in a contract year. Felton’s been a big huge fail so far.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Nate has not figured it out yet
He is not putting the players in position to be successful
No reason Batum can’t get 30+ minutes against Golden State with no bulky 4 or 5’s. He should be backing up the 2, 2 and 4 positions. Heck, he has the length to do a little center against this team.
Crawford has the handle but no decision making ability, Nate needs to SIMPLIFY his role in facilitating the offense. Don’t force it so much. If there is an opening take it. If not pass it to the open wing or LA and cut or wait for a return pass and then take a, most likely open, shot.
Our guards ARE NOT CP3, or Derick Rose or any other superior, penetrating guard that will get the call with contact. This team shoots so poorly because they take bad, contested, shots so much. An open Wes or JC make their shots. Felton is MUCH better when he shoots an open, in rythm shot as well.
by T.O. on Jan 26, 2012 8:41 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Please, please, please ...
give Nic more of Crawford’s 2 guard minutes. I know everyone is disappointed in Felton, but Crawford has been AWFUL. Taking almost 13 shots a game and shooting 35.5% from the field. 15/19 games he has shot less than 40%! How much longer do we wait for him to figure it out. Nic needs 30+ minutes a game, take them from Crawford immediately.
The fact that so many are willing to blame 24 mpg Crawford over the play of 3 30+ mpg starters who have yet to show up for a road game is some serious denial .
If the starters played better Crawford would not be in the game as much . ITS THAT SIMPLE .
Dave of course takes the easy route and blames Crawford for being the whole offense while ignoring the fact that on the road Wes,Felton and Crash have flat out stunk on the road .
That's when the Warriors went buck-naked-wearing-cabbage-on-your-head crazy from the three point arc.

Then the Warriors started “crushing our heads” and “blocking us out.” At the end of the day, all we could do was complain about how salty the ham was.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
What About This...?
How about starting Batum on all road games and Wallace during the home games. Let Gerald backup Nic on the road and vice versa.
I wonder if the effects of Gerald’s previous concussions are slowly starting to show up. I’m certainly not a medical expert but makes me wonder…
Blazers lost because of bad shooting
It’s an old old story. Tonight they were tired, which makes it especially hard to make shots. I blame coaching.
Anyone know if Batum as a restricted Free agent can just up and leave for a French team next year? I don't think so, and least I hope not.
As for Crawford, he is fine as a shooting guard. He is handling the ball too much right now. He needs someone like an Andre Miller to play alongside him to save him from himself. Dre would only pass the ball to Crawford when there is a good likelihood that Crawford will take a high percentage shot. As it is now, there is no one to stop Crawford from doing whatever he wants, which usually means that he is jacking up a long, off balanced shot with little chance of going in.
FIRE NATE1..............please.......somebody........
Then hire someone to hire his replacement. We’re getting hire and hire! Fire and hire….get it?……………..wayward thoughts for a wayward team.
We must endeavor to persevere.

by 

































