Game 18 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 97, Memphis Grizzlies 84
In a Nutshell
The Grizzlies fare well in one area--forcing turnovers--and miserably everywhere else. They can't hit a shot, don't get any whistles, and get pounded into submission by a Trail Blazers team that kept the physical pressure on for the second game in a row. Marcus Camby becomes the transcendent star for one evening, ripping down 22 rebounds and adding 5 blocks, keeping the Grizz on the perimeter and missing.
Game Flow
Sadly a local windstorm kept killing power at Chateau de Dave, interrupting this game with frequency. The big picture came through fine but "flow" was not the strong point tonight. I'll refer you to Timmay's post-game open thread for a discussion of ups and downs. Or you could simply go to the Gameday Threads section and read people's comments as the game unfolded.
Take-Away Points
Yes, the Grizzlies were tired but the Blazers also turned in one of their strongest defensive efforts of the year tonight. It felt like they were buoyed by last night's discovery that physicality produces results. The Blazer big men especially were hammering both the boards and opponents. When the Grizzlies did get the ball inside they were hesitating ever so slightly, wondering from which direction the hammer would fall. With the bigs casting such a big shadow Portland's sometimes-spotty defense against perimeter drivers was neatly disguised. That moment of hesitation was all the guards needed to catch up to their men. After a while it looked like the Grizzlies just stopped going strong inside at all. Every close shot was either an offensive rebound, a fast break, or an accident. Hard-nosed play may well be the missing ingredient to Portland's defensive chemistry. More experimentation ahead.
Portland committed a ton of turnovers tonight, many in the passing lanes and many leading to fast breaks. Memphis will do that to you. The best part about the mistakes was that the Blazers refused to hang their heads and refused to stop running, attacking, and trying to make those passes. That perseverance is part of the reason you saw the refs continue to blow whistles for the Blazers. One team refused to give up when pressed tonight, the other got taken out of their game.
That said, Memphis looked as legit as you can when trailing by 20 much of the game. It's going to be interesting to see the next matchup between these two squads. I'll wager the Grizzlies will come loaded for bear.
Yeah...sorry about that.
Individual Notes
If meriting an instant double-team is an indicator of stardom in this league then LaMarcus Aldridge is clearly a star now, at least when matched up against the likes of Marreese Speights. The Grizz started in single coverage on LMA. Big mistake. He torched them for 14 points in the first quarter, teaching them the error of their ways. After that their defense was in scramble mode for a while...turnover or bust. Aldridge finished 8-13 with 23 points and 6 rebounds. His own defense was superb, as was that of the entire frontcourt.
Gerald Wallace only had 7 points but I suspect he's started to figure out that if you can't beat them, pound them into a quivering ball and then beat them. Even without the offensive fireworks (only 6 shots making 3) he smashed some Grizzly paws in this game. He had 11 rebounds and 2 steals.
Marcus Camby...wow. Dude welded up the lane and wouldn't let anybody break in on his watch. 22 rebounds and 5 blocks are awe-inspiring numbers. His superhuman night made his fellow frontcourt members look spectacular, knowing they didn't have to worry about their backs.
Raymond Felton had 6 turnovers and 2 assists but he kept Portland's tempo up and didn't let the Grizzly guards, including Mike Conley, go too crazy. Good or bad production I like the Raymond Felton of the last few games much better than the Felton of the first dozen the exact same way I liked the blending in Andre Miller of 2010-11 way more than I liked the more explosive but also sticking out of the offense Andre Miller of 2009-10. As much as it's possible not to hurt your team with 6 turnovers, Felton didn't hurt this team tonight. At worst he was a wash. He's had better numbers and hamstrung this team more.
Wesley Matthews went 1-6 from distance but actually drove the lane against a shocked Memphis defense and converted a couple shots and a bunch of free throws (6-6 on the latter). He had 13 points. His defense wasn't bad either...a theme tonight.
Jamal Crawford followed up his night of the year against Sacramento with a typical Jamal night tonight: 5-13 shooting, 15 points and 4 assists in 22 minutes. He looks marginally more comfortable at point guard than he did earlier in the year. That doesn't mean it's a great look for the Blazers.
Speaking of comfortable, Craig Smith made himself right at home with 8 shots in 13 minutes tonight. He connected with 3 for 8 points. He had 3 rebounds, 2 offensive. I love the enthusiasm and that the guy is actually making waves off of Portland's bench, especially since he's doing it in the lane where the Blazers are otherwise silent. That said, he has to remember that rebounding is a strong and necessary part of his portfolio if he wants to remain on the court. Scoring is fun but he's paid to beast up on the boards when Portland runs with a rebounding-challenged bench crew. Just a small check to an otherwise great couple-week run.
Nicolas Batum played 22 minutes and hit 2-4 shots from the field, 5-5 from the foul line for 10 points. He had 2 rebounds, 2 assists, a steal, and a block. There's nothing that wrong with those numbers but they're not that right either. He appeared to be passing up opportunities tonight, going into "I'm just going to hang here and wait for something obvious on offense" mode. He almost looked cavalier about it...passing without even considering that he was open or could have attacked. Unselfishness is fine but you can't pass up good looks nor can Batum afford to flirt with any attitude that involves the lack of aggression. He went for one dunk that looked spectacular but that needs to be his normal M.O., not the exception.
Kurt Thomas played well in 10 minutes. It's possible he's been playing too many minutes lately. He looked more energetic tonight than he has in the last week.
Nolan Smith was all over the floor trying to make something happen in his 9 minutes of play. That's a good sign. If you're going to go out, get carried off on your shield. Unfortunately for him his biggest impact was missing 5 of 6 shots. But again...I'd rather see that than 0-2 right now. Try something and let coach pull you if it doesn't work out.
Elliot Williams hit a pretty shot. I like the way he moves. Unfortunately his game and court awareness aren't to the level we can see more of him yet.
Luke Babbitt followed up his single three-pointer in the last game with a single rebound in this one. Baby steps.
Chris Johnson played 4 minutes and had a MOOOOONNNNNNSSSSSTTTER dunk. Good for him.
Fun With Numbers
- Think the Grizzlies were playing fast? They attempted 90 shots off of a combination of tempo and offensive rebounds. Unfortunately for them they missed 56 of them for a homely 38% clip from the field. The Blazers 43% looked positively Classic Sunsian by comparison.
- Both teams provided blooper material from the arc, the Grizzlies shooting 3-14 for 21%, the Blazers 5-22 for 23%.
- Blazers lose 12-8 in fast break points and 46-32 in points in the paint. Throw 20 turnovers into the mix and this game could have easily been a disaster.
- Great defense was at least half of the difference in overcoming those deficits. Along with the shooting percentages, check these totals out: Gay 11 points, Gasol 7, Conley 6. That's a single quarter of production on many nights. Start with Camby and then credit each layer of Portland's defensive scheme. Nobody was waving hands tonight. It was run, move your feet, and get a body on somebody. The Grizzlies couldn't respond.
- The other difference was Memphis 13 of 17 from the foul line while the Blazers went 30 of 36. You don't see a gap like that too often.
Final Thoughts
Part two of Portland's mission is complete with this second win in three nights. The minutes still look good. All five starters played between 30-32 minutes tonight. However I don't know if any amount of minutes is going to spare their legs as they travel to the bay to play the Warriors tomorrow. If the Blazers get that game, it'll be something.
Read the Memphis perspective at Straight Outta Vancouver.
Grizzlies vs Trail Blazers boxscore
You can find your Jersey Contest Scoreboard here and the form for tomorrow's game right here.
DON'T FORGET TO HELP US SEND UNDERPRIVILEGED KIDS TO THE MARCH 22ND GAME AGAINST THE GRIZZLIES FOR BLAZERSEDGE NIGHT. It's easy to do and makes a huge difference!
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments

"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 10:34 PM PST reply actions
that's my "happy dance"
aka “ants in the pants dance”
aka little Wesley Wiggles
aka Pale Smooth
aka Kid Crossover
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:05 PM PST up reply actions
also

"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:10 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
common...
give it a rest. Felton is playing better, and we’ll continue to see improvement. If the Blazers brass don’t like him at the end of the year, they won’t offer him a contract. simple enough
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
6 TO's, 3 missed 3-pt shots (virtual TO's), and multiple missed passes to open teammates
Maybe his 3-pt shooting gets better, but will his judgement get better? He looks like a one round and out playoff PG to me.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 24, 2012 11:07 PM PST up reply actions
luckily he's like a 4th option on the court for the Blazers
I’ll take his 11 points, 7 assists, and 3 rebounds average any day.
even with a couple turnovers a game, he’s been doing a lot more for the team then his numbers suggest, much in the Wallace or Camby vein.
Not to mention, he gets quite a few hockey assists a game, and he keeps the guys in an uptempo game and gets his points in dire situations where we need someone to put their head down and get to the hoop. He gets to the line when he wants to, and for the most part is a floor general who can hit the deep shot, even if currently his percentages are down a bit.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:18 PM PST up reply actions
His turnovers and poor decision making will kill us in the playoffs. It's a different game.
You’ll see.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 24, 2012 11:27 PM PST up reply actions
if this is how he plays at playoff time, you're absolutely right.
however, I’m betting on him raising his 3pt shooting to about the low 30s, while simultaneously counting down turnovers and learning where to put the ball to make his teammates better. You can already see a difference over the last 4 games.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:31 PM PST up reply actions
A ton of things will eventually kill the Blazers in the playoffs
of which Felton could be one. But in fairness, it’s not him alone. And that doesn’t mean the Blazers are a bad team. They’re talented enough to make the playoffs, which is better than many. They’ll give a good fight. It’s not like other teams will be dying to face them. But just because they’ll probably bow out in the first, and if not certainly the second, round doesn’t make it all Felton’s fault. Maybe different players around him would make him look better.
—Dave
I think our PG (or the guy with the ball in his hands, as Roy used to be) should be the guy who helps his teammates to look better.
That's the hard part: There aren't enough of those PG's in the league
Teams get those PG’s by one of three ways: High draft pick (Rose, Paul, etc), lucky/good drafting (Parker, Rondo, Lawson), or being a large market (Deron, Paul, Chalmers).
The Blazers haven’t done well drafting PG’s, as we all know. And they’re not a large market. So we’re kind of stuck in the middle, and taking a chance on a PG that will hopefully gel with the team, hence Felton’s presence.
The Blazers will keep trying in the draft, I have no doubt. But in the meantime, they also must choose between letting Felton walk, and re-signing him (a questionable decision based on his play). If they let them walk, they literally have no NBA-ready point guard next season, which is ugly unless they want to improve their draft position in 2013.
So, I’ll toss in an insane alternative. (And keep in mind I’m the guy who thinks it’s a no-brainer for Miami to offer Bosh and Wade for Dwight Howard). I know a team that has a PG who is playing out of position, and has two years left on his contract. He’s a decent shooter and a solid but not great NBA player. That same team would love to get that contract off the books by trading for an expiring contract. Plus, he has played with LMA before. So, here’s your crazy trade of the night:
Raymond Felton plus a second round pick to the Hornets for Jarrett Jack.
(BTW I may be insane, but yes, listing Chalmers was a joke)
Absence makes the heart grow fonder
Jarrett certainly seems to have improved a good deal since we traded him, particularly this year, so I don’t think it’s incredibly insane. If Felton’s still playing like this at the trade deadline rather than regressing back to his career means, though, I’d definitely be a fan of that trade.
I just spent some time on bref reviewing JJ vs Felton
And they are pretty similiar overall, both slightly negative Offensive rating vs. Defensive rating. JJ’s TO’s aren’t better than Felton’s, and career wise the Ast/TO ratio for Felton is much better. So I’m not convinced this is the answer.
It's not meant as "the answer"
As I noted, the real answer is a combination of luck or skill in the draft.
This is meant as a holdover measure while they try to find a real PG solution for the long term, instead of losing Felton for nothing if he’s not worth re-signing.
If necessary, sweeten the pot for N.O. with Victor Claver and cash.
Anyhow, Jarrett Jack would be a low-risk/medium-reward acquisition.
"I Am Mine"
really don't want Jarrett Jack back
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Jan 25, 2012 10:13 AM PST up reply actions
I think you have to give Felton some slack.
He will get to know where his team mates need the ball, with a shortened training camp & limited practice time you have to expect some miscommunication.
Somebody step up! - Mike Rice
by We-B-Dunkin on Jan 25, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
I'd agree with most of it
Though only Howard or perhaps Nash could help make Felton much better, seeing how is first responsibility is starting the offense w/o TO … which he often struggles to do … he had a couple horrible TOs tonight, one near the end of the 1st half led to a breakaway dunk.
To the larger point re:playoffs I agree they will struggle given their best players are all coupled in the F positions. So it may not be fair to blame Felton alone. I think the frustration comes when thinking if we had, say, a slightly positive PG we could be much more dangerous.
What about trying to bring in Aaron Brooks?
Any way the blazers can out bid the suns for him at the end of the Chinese season?
by odensraven on Jan 25, 2012 6:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
he may be restricted, but I'd love to get AB
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 25, 2012 10:10 AM PST up reply actions
Who looks more unhappy - Batum or Oden?
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 24, 2012 10:47 PM PST reply actions
In my very humble opinion LMA is a potential MVP candidate so far this year
I think he is more than just “a star”.
Seriously, right?
No way Love or Griffin goes off in the first quarter of a game like LA did tonight.
by JMLakaShotCaller on Jan 24, 2012 10:58 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
They might
But in many ways each has more help. Love has a team that complements him well, and a PG that finds him for easy buckets.
Griffin just has a great supporting class and the best PG in the game on his team.
LMA has done a great job with an unbalanced and not very deep Blazers roster.
Love and easy buckets?
He’s shooting the equivalent of an average NBA guard, at least percentage wise.
by JMLakaShotCaller on Jan 24, 2012 11:24 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
5 3PA/game definitely = guard
and he makes 39% of them. throw in 79% FT shooting on 9 attempts a game, and he’s shooting well enough. I was surprised, too, though that is overall FG% is only 43.0%. Still not as good as LMA on long 2s I guess?
CP may have been the best a couple years ago
But Rose is now and it’s not close.
"But Rose is now and it’s not close."
Nah, it’s close. In fact, I’d still take CP3.
And Russ Westbrook is D-Rose’s equal.
"I Am Mine"
It also depends upon fit
If you need a huge USG guy with acceptable efficiency then Rose (or Westbrook if that’s your cup of tea) is the choice. Perhaps those two can’t defer enough like CP has shown capable of to play on a really strong team.
mm
I’m not sure what “MVP” means, but I think it generally has to do with being heroic and holding together a team that makes hay. I don’t see the Blazers making much hay. I don’t see Lamarcus making much heroic either. I see a good team and an excellent all-around player with an offensive game that has some smooth spit-shine. It’s nice. He’s not getting to line enough and still not nearly a good enough passer to be dominant though. For reference, how many MVPs has Duncan won? He really is the best power forward of all time, which should tell us how hard it is to win an MVP.
Lamarcus is sweet though. He is getting some love this year too.
Come on, let's all hug it out.
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 24, 2012 11:23 PM PST up reply actions
nice analysis
agreed, guys who are MVPs are playing for teams who are excelling in the league and who are putting up insanely good numbers.
LMA is putting up great numbers, but they are All Star numbers, not MVP numbers. He’s a solid top 12 in MVP voting, but it would take a miracle to crack the top 5.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:28 PM PST up reply actions
Looks like we get the top box on NBA.com
I’d love to see that aggressive defense and offense full time. Also, LMA, Camby, Nico and Wallace all beasting out on rebounds consistently would be awesome. Blazers really are a pretty solid team when they’re not dead on their feet.
"Solid team when they're not dead on their feet"
I’d add “when the top 8 are healthy.” That rotation is pretty balanced for lacking a go-to outside scorer. They have defense and some veteran smarts. But the minute someone goes down, the crumminess of the others gets exposed. Thomas and Smith are bigger/smaller older/younger versions of the same player. There’s no backup PG; just drive-first thing 1 and thing 2. To surprise anyone in the playoffs you can’t have a single injury, and since the compressed season virtually guarantees injuries it’s likely we’ll get a playoff seeding that’s not conducive to an upset.
Steve Goodman lives.
by twinsbrewer on Jan 25, 2012 12:16 AM PST up reply actions
Like a big, steaming, rotten cow pie,
Memphis stunk it up from the field. The Blazers were D-in’ though! Not a bad game.
Come on, let's all hug it out.
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 24, 2012 11:18 PM PST reply actions
So how does Williams get from here to there without playing time?
Elliot Williams hit a pretty shot. I like the way he moves. Unfortunately his game and court awareness aren’t to the level we can see more of him yet.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
when he consistently plays well in practice and games
and doesn’t turn the ball over. None of the guys after Craig Smith off the bench can bring that.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:29 PM PST up reply actions
I could use your source on his practice performance
But calling for game performance requires that he be in games…
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 24, 2012 11:40 PM PST up reply actions
old Sarge is my source
and it seems obvious that outside of his out-of-this-world leaping ability, Elliott is bringing little to the table in Nate’s eyes.
I’m sure he needs to work on his defense as well. I’d like to see the kid get a chance, much like Babbitt: when the score is out of reach. But having all the guys in together just leads to bad scrub turnovers and whatnot.
If Elliott was making a huge impression, he would be getting mins off the bench over Nolan Smith.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 24, 2012 11:44 PM PST up reply actions
"Old Sarge" has a lot of reasons not to play Williams
1) If he outperforms Crawford – creates a controversy
In retrospect – that is probably the primary reason we won’t see meaningful minutes for Williams….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 24, 2012 11:58 PM PST up reply actions
Unsure why he's not playing E-Will.
In Seattle, Nate had a similar player to E-Will, Ron “Flip” Murray, who played rotation minutes.
However, those kind of athletic, yet unskilled combo guards like E-Will and Flip are nothing to write home about. A dime a dozen, in fact.
"I Am Mine"
Big reach
Comparing Williams to Murray. Williams is a 6’5 SG with “handles” and extreme hops, while Murray was a 6’3 combo guard that couldn’t shoot.
We don’t know yet if Williams can shoot in the NBA – but early returns are promising. Wlilliams won’t be an NBA PG – but his known skills and talents are direct counterpoints to the known weaknesses of a guy like Mathews.
I would find it hard to believe that there is anything Crawford can do that Williams couldn’t. Three pointers? Shoot contested J’s? Pass occasionally? Drive into traffic and throw wild shots at the rim? Bring the ball up the court? Defend? Rebound?
It doesn’t take much speculation to hypothesize that Williams could shoot better, finish better, defend better, rebound better than Crawford.
It’s not because Williams is all that great (big unknown), but more because Crawford is really that bad.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 25, 2012 11:28 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Scratch that, there are varying reports on their heights.
Combine measurements have Murray listed at 6’3" without shoes and 6’4.5" with shoes, while Williams didn’t show up at the pre-draft combine. In any case, I’d bet my bottom dollar the Trail Blazers media guide stretched E-Will’s height an inch.
"I Am Mine"
actually if he would outperform Crawford he would also be outperforming Wes and Ray as Crawford is outperforming them as well and thats what would create the controversy
by Willie Beamon on Jan 25, 2012 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
Crawford occasionally outperforms Felton and Mathews
But not usually….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 25, 2012 11:10 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
pump the starters up so we can finish off more teams early ;)
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
Kevin Garnett LOVED Smith as a T-Wolf
He’s what a friend of mine used to call a “scrapper.” Wrong size (too bulky for PF, too short for C) but just someone who’s stayed in the league from pure effort. Methinks Blazer fans will come to admire him, if he plays enough (12 minutes a game or so.)
Steve Goodman lives.
Wallace was still moving when Gasol took his "second" step going to the rim.
It was an obvious defensive foul, but putting his body between a running Gasol and the basket was worth two offensive fouls. 2-1=1, easy maths for the refs. And it was a thing of beauty.
id rather see
elliot rather then nolan, nolan cant shoot the ball to save his life!
They are both unproven players and nothing can really be drawn from their performance thus far.
Need a significantly larger sample size before we could make statements like that. Obviously Sarge gets to see that sample size in practice and is acting accordingly.
Give them time
We’ve seen glimpses of great things from both of these players- it will come
by powerplayexpert on Jan 25, 2012 2:23 PM PST up reply actions
As Dave says
“Hard-nosed play may well be the missing ingredient to Portland’s defensive chemistry. More experimentation ahead.” This has been the team’s trouble, even during the best years of Brandon Roy. Hard fouls, inside domination and vicious defense followed the promise of Oden right out the door. Kurt Thomas and Craig Smith are a breath of fresh air and I wish we had one more like them.
kenyon martin
once he gets back from china
"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."
camby's already trying to recruit him
"Wide, girthy. Just like a Rhino. Sometimes my horns are visible."
RE: Craig Smith
the guy is actually making waves off of Portland’s bench
I’m surprised the guy doens’t yell, “CANNONBALL!” when he comes into the game.

the rhino unleashes from within.
I don't always root for an NBA franchise, but when I do, I prefer the Portland Trail Blazers.
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Jan 25, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions

by 
































