1/22/12 Blow up the roster! Trade Editon
After going 2-4 in this 6 game road trip, im starting to think this is not the team of the future. We are currently
9-7 9th seed in the west. If we keep this up we will be lucky to make the playoffs. Our weakness is, we are too inconsistent thought the whole game, we start of bad and end the games coming up just short. We play pretty good at the R/G, and we are miserable in the road. I think there are a few trades we can make to still make to make a championship run this season, and for seasons too come.
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7sokw4y
We would get Rondo, Stiemsma
Boston would get Matthews, Batum, Williams, Smith
Why it works: Celtics would get Batum a very young talented player he can shoot 3ptrs mid range game, some what of a post up game, and really good on D. Matthews a good young player, can shoot the 3, he is great in finsihing fast breaks, and solid on D. Smith a good young project, if given the chance he could be a good role player. Williams young raw athletic freak. And with Allen, Garnet coming off their books this summer they can go after a F/A, best chances with a rebuilding team a Restricted F/A.
What to do with Felton
Trade Him: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8yexbku
Why it works: The Lakers really need a PG, Felton is a good PG not great but good. He could be the answer to their problems.
Pacers: They get World Peace a good player when he wants to play, Babbitt a good bench warmer that could be a good shooter if given the chance, Johnson a throw in peace. Cash, draft picks from Portland, 2nd rounder from LA
Our new roster:
PG: Rondo, Price,
SG: Crawford, Jones
SF: Wallace, Ebanks
PF: Aldridge, Smith. Thomas
C: Camby, Stiemsma, Johnson, Oden?
With this Roster we can make a Playoff Push, we probably wont have the best record in the west, because we dont have much depth, but we can compete hard in a 7 game series. Our project would really start in the summer of 2012.
I would try to deal for Rondo, because that could be a big factor in signing a big name F/A next summer. With Rondo and LA, we could lure a Big name F/A to Portland. How with the expiring contracts of Marcus Camby, and Gerald Wallace.
Possible 2012 F/A
(URFA)Dwight Howard,(RFA) Roy Hibbert,(RFA) Brook Lopez,(RFA) JaVale McGee,(RFA) Kevin Love, Danillo Gallinari (RFA), The list goes on and on.
Link for F/A's
263 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
babs.
"I told somebody to stop crying," Pendergraph said after the game. "Actually, I told them all to stop crying."
Just found this online
I dont know if the Jazz would do it
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=73htv4p
I used to be a big fan of bringing in Harris
but for whatever reason he’s just not interesting to me anymore.
by hoodieNation on Jan 22, 2012 8:24 AM PST up reply actions
the trade says it would bring 12 more
loses for a reason terrible trade never would happen
disagree
although I havent been impressed with Rays game so far, Harris #’s are less than Rays, both career and this season.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 11:19 AM PST up reply actions
Maybe you are right but personally I like Harris Better
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6qy49rb
and keep felton
I like the Rondo idea, but not the Felton one.
I’d prefer to stockpile some draft picks to either make a big trade on draft day or rebuild through the stacked 2012 draft.
Batum Shakalaka
Two things
Pacers take RonRon back? Lol!!
Also, I think Oden should legally change his name to “Oden?” for us.
by The Penguin on Jan 22, 2012 9:35 AM PST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Actually it MR Metta World Peace
He is a beast when he has his head on planet earth, the Pacers need a lock down defender Mr World Peace is exactly that he is better then Jones in offence and on D
Call Houston. They have two first round picks and one of them is the Knicks(top 5 protected.
They need help at the 3 and a sign-and-trade with Batum would be a good solution. He instantly becomes the best 3 on their team and an upgrade to the defense and perimeter shooting.
Now I don’t expect them to part with both picks or even the Knicks pick (which would be a lotto pick if the draft started today) for just Batum, but it’s a good conversation starter. To have 2 or 3 first rounders in this draft would be a great start to a rebuild.
Thoes trades are intresting but I think we can get more for Batum
Honestly we should get a prove NBA player if we can, not a draft pick unless its like the # 1 pick in the Draft
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 3:51 PM PST up reply actions
A little bit of an over value for Batum for the pick thing....
I understand the reasoning in a proven player for a proven player thing but a first overall?
If we could trade Batum for the number pick in the draft everyone here would pull the trigger and it was also let me know that every GM in the NBA was a member of this website.
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 4:58 PM PST up reply actions
Trade 4 Bogut:
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6v66tx6
Blazers get:
Bogut
Livingston
Bucks get:
Wallace
Matthews
Chris Johnson
What say you?
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
do it?
git r done?
lets go!
anytime!
im down son!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 11:36 AM PST up reply actions
I've always held out hope, kind of like Oden
for Livingston that he would one day be healthy for awhile. He finally did it & has actually played quite efficient the last few seasons too.
Aldridge/Bogut front court with depth like Camby(Who we should resign next year to a deal like…) Kurt Thomas, Craig Smith, not to mention the possibility of adding Kenyon Martin once his CBA contract expires mid season, makes us the deepest team in the league at the 4/5 spots. They might ask for Oden’s bird rights or a draft pick & I would oblige.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
I think thats not enough for Milwaukee
Wallace would probably sign eals wear after the season, so that doesn’t do them any good.
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 12:19 PM PST up reply actions
Thats why instead of trading Felton to LA
I’d push Atlanta for Kirk Hinrich. Plays good defense at both guard spots & a solid 3 point shooter. He can fill in start at the 2 because he can defend most at that spot & keep Crawford on the bench. While that muddles the 1 spot by patching the 2, it will allow us to see if Nolan Smith or Elliot Williams are worth anything.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
all in all i agree that we need to make some changes
Blowin it up is a little hasty. IMO, we are 1 player away from championship contention. That is a center, a good center. Who we should target , IDK. It depends on if the FO can decide if we should make a move this season, or wait and try to get better in the offseason.
The only scary thing about waiting for Free Agents in the offseason is the fact that none of the better FAs want to play here. Also, if we wait to make a trade, I think some of these guys wont be coming back next season, so we will lose some of our better trade pieces.
Its a tough call, but if someone offers us a decent center, man we should go for it. IMO we need an upgrade at center b4 we try to upgrade our PG. We seriously blew it not getting one of the better FA centers that were available, or atleast not making an offer. They must think that Greg Oden is going to come back or else they would have went after a center. Truly weve put ourselves into a bad position, it is all one big gamble. I just dont like our chances when we gamble.
Even though I know he aint coming here, we should put all our chips on trying to land Dwight Howard. IMO, we are one of the few teams who has a rich enough owner to offer D12 something he cant refuse, like an extremely front loaded contract. An offer that is so worth it, that he would have to come here. Otherwise, Hibbert, Dalembert, NeNe- IDK just make an offer and try to get one of the leagues top 5 centers. That should be our #1 goal -IMO.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 11:35 AM PST reply actions
Knick are 6-10!
They have 3 star players as well-Melo, Amare and Tyson. If they are gonna suck it up all season maybe they will be down to get rid of Tyson. I just dream of the day when we have a great center to pair with LMA and then add a 3pt shooting specialist who can draw out the defense. Thats money!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 11:40 AM PST up reply actions
Trade for Rondo
Then at the deadline trade Camby + Felton for Tyson
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
Studamire and Felton play great together
They would get Camby essentially an Older Tyson, and expiring contracts for 2012/
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:19 PM PST up reply actions
But if you had the chance to get Rondo for Batum+Matthews+Williams+Smith+Cash+Picks
would you do it
Can you get a Center in Rondos supper star class for those players?
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:17 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, if you could get Rondo for that, I'd do it
and take my chances on finding a C in free agency, or playing LA out of position.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Ugh, I wouldn't...
but then again, I don’t like Rondo’s game, although I agree he’s a great player.
by avalancheman on Jan 23, 2012 7:02 AM PST up reply actions
No!
Rondo is a fantastic PG in the right system, with the right team. He thrives in the fastbreak, can defend any PG and is a true pass-first player. Sounds great right? His numbers would plummet in PDX for 2 reasons: (1) McMillan and (2) your trade gets rid of all shooters, if you can call them that. Rondo needs players who will knock down shots in order to excel. If his teammates aren’t hitting their shots his assist numbers go down. If his teammates aren’t hitting their shots his ability to drive is drastically reduced by a collapsing defense and his scoring goes down. Lastly, why would Boston ever trade Rondo and not get a starting PG back in return? In your trade scenarios you’ve got to be realistic and look at the trade from both standpoints. Every scenario you’ve presented in this post benefits PDX and has no chance of being accepted by the other team!
Lets Do It
Right now the Magic are playing the "we are not trading our supper star game’ to pressure teams to offer more then what they should offer. With Howard with us this season he will love the fans, he would sign like a 4 year 95 Million extension. And we will all be happy.
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 7:23 PM PST up reply actions
Also, I dont like Rondo that much
I think his stats are way overblown because of the people he plays with. My grandma could be a good PG playing with Boston. They have to many good options to pass to. I think if he played with a team like ours, his numbers would plummet.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 11:42 AM PST reply actions
I love Rondo
Any deal that brings him to Portland I’ll love. He plays defense on point guards like Gerald Wallace plays on Small forwards. Just athletically dominant to a point where every PG in the NBA typically has his worst games against R.R. I think we have enough talent here in Portland with Aldridge + Wallace or Batum to keep his numbers high enough to annually challenge Chris Paul for the starting PG spot at the All star game. I have saw Ason Kid add a J to his game & it looks like Andre Miller has done the same thing. If Rajon Rondo managed to become just a decent set shooter from deep he would probably be the best PG in the NBA because of how much more an advantage that would provide. In closing, the short preview of what Portland looks like in a high pressure defense w/ high tempo offense most of our team can excel. If Rondo was running the break & playing defense alongside the like of Wallace, we would be one of the best teams in the NBA, imo.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Well said
Just what we need, we let CP3 slip away lets steal Rondo from the Celtics
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 12:00 PM PST up reply actions
He is a superb Fast break player, superb Defender, and superb Passer
What eals do we need ?
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions
exactly.
championship experience & the kid has the will to win. Perfect age (25, same as LaMarcus). He is also oddly abrasive, which kind of tailors to the “keep Portland weird” motto, i’d rather have that then happy go lucky Raymond Felton. But then instead of shipping Felton to LA, give the Hawks a draft pick + Felton for Hinrich(Resign him next year for mini MLE)
Rondo/Hinrich
Hinrich/Crawford(Soon to be replaced by Jared Cunningham OR Terrence Ross in draft)
Wallace/Babbitt(Though, soon to be replaced by Mike Moser OR Terrence Jones in the draft)
Aldridge/Kenyon Martin(Sign him after his chinese league contract expires)/Craig Smith
Kurt Thomas/Marcus Camby(Resign him next year to a deal like KT)/Stiemsma
This makes us arguably the best defensive team in the NBA & with perimeter defenders like this we could play Nate’s SOS defense with great success. If McMillan reverts back to his old 1vs5 ISO ways while still bringing a team like this to the table, fire him & try to bring Larry Brown out of retirement. If not make a splash Coach/GM hire, like Rick Pitino?
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
word, all good points bro
I still dont think much of Rondo and I say go for a center b4 we go for a PG. I would way rather have Rondo than Nash, just sayin, im tryin to end with a positive!
: )
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 12:22 PM PST up reply actions
Jared Cunningham is not an NBA player in my opinion.
I go to most Beavers home games and the guy is not a good shooter. Coach has him playing backup point guard and Jared will occasionally bring the ball up the floor when Starks gets too focused on scoring. The problem with this is that Jared has a worse handle than Wes Matthews. What is left is a creative finisher with above average athleticism who has lacks the handle and the quickness to beat his man off the dribble.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 22, 2012 12:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Jared Cunningham reminds me of Tony Allen
Who also doesn’t have a shot, yet is considered one of the best role players in the NBA. Whether it be a cutting off the ball or running on the fast break he can finish at the rim & play great defense.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
I've never thought of Jared as a great defender.
He has been getting torched by no names. Although that could be Roberto’s fault.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 22, 2012 3:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
?
Cunningham is one of the best defenders at the college level right now. You shouldn’t be watching Nelson on D, Cunningham is all effort & pressue. Also, he’d look a lot better if he was funneling his man to NBA level post defenders.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
it's not always about the stats
Rondo sets up his teammates can run the break and plays great d. He is elite. Just watch him play and you’ll see.
Batum Shakalaka
Just wanna say Hollinger agrees with me on the "we need a center" bandwagon
Bryan (Gold Beach, OR)
With the Blazers cold shooting on the road continuing last night, can anyone still consider them a contender in the West?
John Hollinger (12:22 PM)
“I would say “fringe contender” — but it’s hard to score consistently when the No. 2 and No. 3 guys in shot attempts are both bricking in the mid-30s. Also, Aldridge has shrunk in some big moments against Houston and Atlanta. That said, if they were to stumble into a true starter-quality 5 they’d be pretty fearsome."
He also basically says Oden when asked who we should get in free agency. Which means to me that the FA market isnt a place that the Blazers want to shop. The only way we get good players to come here is to trade for them—aka the Wallace deal.
http://www.blazersedge.com/2012/1/19/2718877/john-hollinger-on-the-blazers
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 12:31 PM PST reply actions
also notice he doesnt say
Trade or get rid of Ray? the 5 position should be our 1st upgrade not the pg
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 22, 2012 1:07 PM PST up reply actions
You say we need a Center im with you show me a trade
But if I had the chance to get Rondo, im the first one calling their GM to trade for him. Just saying
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:22 PM PST up reply actions
Monta Ellis is the guy we really need look at
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=863a28f
He solves all kinds of scoring and fast break issues. Wallace would answer some questions for the Warriors and be a good leader for Mark Jackson and the new style of ball he wants to play there.
"Brandon Roy has done this before."
Extend-and-trade Batum and dump JCrossover to match salary.
What else would it take? They would probably only trade Monte for LaMarcus.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 22, 2012 12:48 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I think they'd do Wallace for him straight across.
He’d inspire the culture change Mark Jackson is looking for.
I’d also like to see us swing something like THIS: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7oncko6
Gives us a starting lineup of:
Felton (Who’s been an undeserved goat of this team)
Ellis
Batum
Aldridge
Thompson
"Brandon Roy has done this before."
Durig the Draft i was a blazersedger that was commentating about getting Ellis
And I got killed, everyone said he was a black hole and he sucks in D
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 3:56 PM PST up reply actions
But
If we can get him for wallace do it, a trade for him would look like this
Wallace, Matthews, Williams, Cash, Picks
For
Ellis, Wright
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:02 PM PST up reply actions
Dorell Wright would be another great acquisition for this team
Love it!
"Brandon Roy has done this before."
Last year he was an "untouchable"
His stock has fallen this year because of Brandon Rush, if we could do that deal he would replace weasly’s 3point shooting.
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
Really?
You’d rather spend 5 years mired in loss than trade for a stud scorer who fills almost every perimeter need we’re lacking?
I guess if that’s what you’re into… but I’d rather win.
"Brandon Roy has done this before."
But having Ellis around a bunch of Studs will
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:54 PM PST up reply actions
Our only stud is LaMarcus Aldridge
And GSW would require at least two of the not-quite-studs plus picks as the minimum in a trade for Monta.
I can appreciate the concept of Monta, Aldridge, and player-to-be-named later as a trio with role players built around them. They’d get us into the playoffs, and maybe out of the first round if the stars align. But since that’s basically where I currently see us, that doesn’t really constitute an upgrade.
by Timmay! on Jan 22, 2012 5:59 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
"You’d rather spend 5 years mired in loss [...]"
And you’d rather spend five years mired in mediocrity?
Fun.
"I Am Mine"
We need a starting shooting guard who can break his man down off the dribble, get into the lane and finish around the trees.
If you were the GM who would you ask for that can fill that role? I am willing to extend-and-trade Batum ~7 million and include Crawford 5 million. I will give up all of the rookies, euros and sophmores not named Nolan Smith (someone has to be the backup point guard).
Two years ago we were laughing at the mega Contracts givin out to Gay, Johnson and Igudala. Today we are wishing that those guys were on our team. The problem is I see all those guys as small forwards more than shooting guards. Please hive-mind, who can best fill the Brandon Roy sized hole at shooting guard?
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 22, 2012 12:45 PM PST via mobile reply actions
I think Johnson is over-paid in my opinion
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
Gay and Johnson are overpaid
Igoudala earns his paycheck.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Rudy Gay and Andre Iguodala didn't get mega-contracts or whatever.
They’re both paid handsomely, yes. Yet, it’s unfair to lump them in with Joe Johnson. Gay and Iguodala got contracts in the $80 million range, while Johnson got a contract in the $120 million range. Nope, that isn’t a misprint. Over $123 million over six years for Joe Johnson. For reals …
"I Am Mine"
I've never tried the trade machine before but...
Does this make any sense?
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7djcw7q
We get the ultimate shooter (I know he’s old but he’s in awesome condition and the consummate pro) and a PF to shore up our frontline. Boston get’s younger and get’s a player in Wallace they can keep or get away from for cap space.
Is this a ridiculous idea?
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
It isn't totally ridiculous in my mind
Nic needs to be on the court 35 minutes a night. It would be ideal to trade Wallace for a center but this would give the Blazers some more roster balance and shooting that they desperately need.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
Yeah getting a center would be ideal...
But a center alone doesn’t solve the most painful weakness we have right now… We can’t hit any shots!
Getting Nic on the floor and adding a PF like Bass does give us more options at the 4 & 5. A Bass/LMA combination could see some time resting Camby and Thomas and Bass and Camby/Thomas could hold their own while LMA rested. Throw in an occasional dose of Rhino and it seems we’d have a rotation that could keep LaMarcus around 35 mins. per game.
Thanks for your input on the trade. I’ve purposely avoided the “Machine” until now but I has to give it a try.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
Maybe Crawford is getting his misses out of the way...?
Kaman, Aldridge, Batum, Matthews, Felton, Crawford, Camby, Thomas, Smith
Then what? Nolan, Elliot, Babbitt getting some minutes with Matthews playing some 3?
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
Wallace for Kaman
Could Kaman return to form from a couple years ago with a starting role and some minutes? Everybody wants Okafur, which I get and would be a better addition. But could you get Kaman for less and add some offense and rebounding??
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
The Kaman of old was good but...
…with the absolute lack of outside shooting we have right now teams would be free to collapse in the lane and stop Kaman or any other available center we may get.
If teams feared our outside shot it would make life for LMA a tone easier.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
Do you really want another big who's main strength is the 20'?..
…and isn’t really a defensive force?..
That seems to eliminate the benefit of getting a center.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
No way
Kaman is a type of Center that needs the ball, he would take away shots from LMA
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:23 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, he's a hobo's Aldridge, in reality.
I don’t like the idea of players with overlapping skillsets, unless it’s a guy like Gerald Wallace.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
this is terrible you get rid of a young guy
for someone that is way to old and is on their way out
Ray Allen shows no sign of being "way to old"...
He may only have 2-3 years left on him but this trade also includes Wallace who…with his style of play… may have about the same window of effectiveness.
The trade also nets us 26 year old PF who is ok not being the starter but can play starter minutes if necessary.
The other benefit in some ways is that it gets the longest contract we have on the book…outside LMA… off the books and makes us very, very flexible in two years.
I’m not saying this trade saves us but it takes a lot more to make a deal “terrible” then trading young for old. Would you trade Nolan Smith for Steve Nash? I for one think Ray Allen has more left in the tank then Nash and people talk about trading for him.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
look at boston this year
thats enough of a sign for me, you give up wes for a guy that will get you maybe 6-9 points a game but cant play d and he shoots way to much yeah alright great deal! never would happen not good enough
C'mon...
Do you really think Ray Allen is the root of the Celtics problems this year? Ray is leading them in scoring while taking 10 shots per game… shooting 50% from the field and 56.5% from the 3!!!
Is 10 shots per game too many shots for a guy with those percentages??? Right now Wes is taking 11 shots and hitting 41% from the field and 35% from 3.
I understand if you like Wes and don’t like the trade but I certainly don’t understand your argument.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
because ray allen is getting old
ok i didnt check stats so you got me there but im just saying he doesnt play d, and thats a big reason why that team is horrible right now cause the big three doesnt play d. wes plays defense like his shooting or not and thats enough for me wes will hit his shots. its to risky to trade for an old man that will hit the wall at the end of this shortened season. he cant play 30 minutes a night like we need.
he also got injured today so
the trade wouldnt happen anyways
Ray Allen has played 35mins. plus a game every year since 99-00... Including this year...
…and his defense is certainly no worse then JFallover’s….
A starting line up of the two Ray’s, Nic, LMA & Camby for now would be a decent defensive unit and a better scoring team then we currently have. Allen and Nic spreading the floor would open up a world of space in the lane for LaMarcus and we’d have a decent 4-5 rotation off the bench to keep the minutes under control.
The team we have right now is not a top tier team… and I’ll admit this trade wouldn’t necessarily make us one either. What it would do is make life easier for our best player and get us to a good cap space position faster.
And by the way Allen simply jammed his ankle a little and may very well not even miss one game. Not sure that’s a,“call off any trades” kinda injury.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
actually it is worse then
wes’ d he is to old, he will fall apart at the end of this year no matter what you say! he plays 35 minutes a night wont happen here he cant log that many minutes and all he does is shoot the guy is not better then wes in a shortened season plus wes is 10 years younger i like that more then some old poor mans reggie miller
The fact that you think Wes is better then Ray Allen...
means I should give up trying to reason with you. I have several pairs of Rose Garden Colored glasses and have been accused of being blinded by my Blazer love but I can clearly see that right now Ray Allen is head and shoulders above Wes no matter how much I like We$… and no matter what you say.
Allen’s career numbers are 20.2 pts… 4.3 rebounds and 3.6 assists per game. He is as consistent as a player get’s. It’s safe to say Wes will NEVER be as good as Ray Allen is right now and I think you far over value Wes’ defense. He’s scrappy but his on ball defense isn’t nearly as good as many seem to think.
Ray Allen’s work out regimen and discipline is famous and has been well documented. He is the poster child for physical conditioning and has played 78 games plus in 6 out of the last 7 years including 80 last year.
You may have missed it buy Ray Allen passed Reggie Miller as the All Time 3 point shooter in the history of the NBA last year. I’m sure some will disagree but Reggie Miller is the poor man’s Ray Allen in my book. How many titles did Miller win again?
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
I can see that happening
But I dont want it too happen, trade our young developing SG for an old player. doesn’t attract me
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:05 PM PST up reply actions
At 25, Wesley Matthews is not a "young developing SG" anymore.
Coming out of Marquette, Matthews was a four-year product with little upside. He is who he is, which is a so-so 7th man on a decent team. Or, in Portland’s case, a below average starting wing on an average team. Matthews isn’t a prospect, a’ight. On the contrary, he’s a garden-variety, run-of-the-mill role player.
Nothing more, nothing less
"I Am Mine"
I think you underestimate the growth that happens past age 25...
especially on the defensive end. He’s a decent defensive player as is, and could become very very good. His three point shooting, while streaky, makes him always a threat… and he can still gain consistency, as we’ve seen happen with players older than he is. He maybe isn’t young, developing… but he is not fully evolved yet either. Also, I argue with your definition of “decent team”. Clearly, you believe you need to be contending to be a “decent team”. I’d put Matthews squarely in the “run-of-the-mill starting wing” category. I’d almost raise him to the level of a number 3 offensive and defensive weapon on a contender… not yet, but in a couple years, sure. He can cut, he can shoot the three, and he defends. Those first two put together CAN, in fact, create an unstoppable offensive force, even without any handles whatsoever, so long as he is working off-the-ball. The problems come in when he tries to be mr. swiss army knife, rather than mr. scalpel. Or the nights when he tries to act like Gerald and become a machete.
by avalancheman on Jan 23, 2012 7:18 AM PST up reply actions
What you're saying about Wesley Matthews are the same things many people said about a ...
young Quentin Richardson when he was tearing it up for the Clippers and the Suns. That didn’t pan out, did it?
Countless players stagnate in their mid-20s, even though people want to run their mouths about every guy having an upward trajectory. It just doesn’t work that way, okay. Most players plateau by their mid-20s, while several others peak early and decline in their late-20s.
"I Am Mine"
Yes countless players do not pan out
the ones who do all have one thing in common: work ethic. And wes’ work ethic is very very very good. Do I ever think he will be a super star? No. Do I think he makes an All-Star team? Not likely. An All-Defensive team selection? Perhaps, though once again, not likely. A good, solid starter… most assuredly, yes. His tools are good, but nothing spectacular. His mental game at this point, however, shows much room for improvement… and I see a significant portion of this evolution coming to him over the next few years… If you’re right and I’m wrong, fine… but until it happens one way or the other, hes not only a valuable piece for us, but a decent trade asset as well. Hes at his physical peak now and will be until hes around 30, and he doesn’t rely on his athleticism (other than his speed in the open court)… so I don’t see him as being at the peak of his game yet… not when MOST players still see development of varying degrees at his age.
by avalancheman on Jan 23, 2012 11:27 PM PST up reply actions
Or, more appropriately, a guy like Wesley Matthews.
Matthews could work his little heart out, but he’ll never be a borderline HOFer like Vince or his cousin Tracy.
"I Am Mine"
If this team ever helped the lakers with a trade of any kind
I don’t know what I would do with myself.
kaman, gortat
these guys arnt the guys we need, we need a bruiser who is going to man the post and get 10+ rebounds a game, now thats a guy like marc gasol, roy hibbert, brook lopez, javale mcgee, greg monroe, emeka okafor, zaza pachulia all of theses guys can play d rebound and they wont try and shoot 20 footers.
I'm just thinking realistically..
If we want anyone of relevance were going to have to trade a lot. Meaning Batum, Wallace, Camby (our only center) Felton..And if we get in return 1 good player for 3 of our role players, I’m not sure I would want that; considering the fact no star talent will come here.
Why not?
Portland gets: D. Williams, D. Howard
New Jersey gets: Felton, Thabeet, Morris, Budinger, two 2nd round picks (POR), future 1st round pick (POR)
Orlando gets: Camby, Batum, Dragic, Patterson, Freeland, 2012 1st round pick (NYN), cash (POR), 2012 2nd round pick (HOU)
Houston gets: Wallace, Babbitt, A. Johnson
Orlando and New Jersey will be all over it.
They do give up a lot for sure
After the almost Gasol trade, I’d be inclined to think they’d do it. They’ve stockpiled so many assets, they don’t really need most of the players they’d trade. It might be too much to give up for them, I’d be worried about the other two teams though.
They are giving up a lot of big men, maybe throw in Williams or Lee instead of Patterson. We could give them CJ too. Wallace would be a great fit there.
I think Wallace agreeing to an extend-and-trade would have to be key for it to happen in this crazy reality.
No reason for them to rent him for a year when they could pursue him as a free agent.
But on a serious note, just using Portland and Houston scenario, it’s a good way to build some assets.
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 3:09 PM PST up reply actions
You're worried about Houston?
Does Houston get a raw deal? Yeah, to an extent. However, Orlando and New Jersey are the ones that get bent over a barrel and reamed like there’s no tomorrow.
"I Am Mine"
by AK1984 on Jan 22, 2012 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Yeah they is no way Portland of all teams ends up with both Superstars...
Both of those teams would want a rebuild-in-a-box type package for giving them up and Portland doesn’t have those kind of assets
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 3:29 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, Portland is an above average team with below average assets. Sad, but true.
In light of that, Portland ought to dismantle its current core and rebuild through the draft.
I understand that doing so is neither sexy nor fun, but it’s the correct move nonetheless.
"I Am Mine"
I like rebuilding
It’s more fun watching the young players develop than hoping for a low playoff berth so we can lose in six games. I don’t mind trading anybody else, but I have would have a hard time stomaching an Aldridge trade.
I think he’s young enough we can rebuild with him as a big piece.
watch the Wizards
you can watch 3 decades of rebuilding stretch into a 4th.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
Yeah I'm joking
I was kinda hoping the sarcastic Orlando and New Jersey would be all over it comment at the end would give it away. Joking in a wish that could happen kind of way. I could make an argument for it but it just ain’t gonna happen.
Boston won't trade Rajon Rondo for that garbage.
Hot, burning garbage.
Also, Ron Artest will never, ever play for the Indiana Pacers again—NEVER!
"I Am Mine"
Firs of all
How is Batum, Matthews garbage?
2nd of all they will never ever trade for Ron Artest he is dead
its now Mr. Metta World Peace
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:41 PM PST up reply actions
If you trade the best talent on your team away
it’s not for two young guys that are somewhere between the roles of starter/role player
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 4:54 PM PST up reply actions
This
Right now, Wesley Matthews is a below average shooting guard. He can’t dribble/create his own shot, is an average at best on ball defender, and when he’s not hitting, he contributes little value in terms of rebounding or assists. Batum has an interesting skill set, but his growth seems to have stagnated and even under that proposed deal (which is horrible for Boston), he would be a bench player behind Pierce and Allen. Asking the Celtics to give up a young all star for two bench players is insulting to their intelligence. You want Rondo, LMA is going to Boston, no other way Ainge would even pick up the phone.
Kevin Durant won me over when he went Rocky IV on Russia this summer.
by blazeraddict on Jan 22, 2012 4:59 PM PST up reply actions
This trade happens if they blow the whole thing up get rid of the big 3
Then Batum, would be a starter. If Batum is a bench warmer how come we have offered 3rd pick in the draft, he is a stud, some people take him over Wallace, a former all-star, then devalue his value I dont get it.
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:20 PM PST up reply actions
If Boston's to make a trade, it'd be a deal like Paul Pierce to Indiana for Paul George and ...
a 2012 first-round draft pick. As it is, that trade would get the Celtics under the luxury tax this season — as the Pacers have the cap room to make said deal — while also getting a young up-and-comer on the wing and, moreover, an asset in a future draft pick.
Another option could be just trading Ray Allen to the Pacers for a 2012 first-round draft pick. That, too, would get the Celtics under the luxury tax line, but it’d be a deal with far less risk for both sides than the Pierce/George proposal.
"I Am Mine"
"You want Rondo, LMA is going to Boston, no other way Ainge would even pick up the phone."
That sums it up.
Besides, if the Celtics do look to rebuild by moving one of the “Big Three” in a deal, then Rajon Rondo will almost assuredly stick around in Beantown on his remarkably cap-friendly contract.
"I Am Mine"
This works
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6vl8xnr
Get rid of Crawford at deadline for anything. Guys a blackhole.
If Portland wants to rebuild, then it must dismantle its core for future assets. Rebuild through the NBA Draft.
That means trading LaMarcus Aldridge.
Yes, LMA.
Aldridge to N.J. for Memo Okur, Brook Lopez, a 2012 first-round draft pick, a 2014 first-round draft pick, a 2016 first-round draft pick, a 2018 first-round draft pick, and a future conditional draft pick — via Houston — that’s a lotto-protected first-rounder from 2012 through 2016 or a 2017 second-rounder if it’s not conveyed by then.
The first part of the rebuilding process is dismantling the core. Since Portland’s core is ice cold instead of red hot, it’s time to blow it up. Luckily, Portland’s core is now only one player, LMA, who’s not a championship level #1 option. Them’s the facts, Jack.
Rebuilding is painful, okay. I know that. Yet, it’s the way to go. In Seattle, I got to witness rebuilding first-hand in the late-2000s. Unfortunately, OKC reaped the fruits of our labor. But that’s life, though. Man, it sure ain’t easy.
"I Am Mine"
What about a semi-rebuild?
Keep LMA but rebuild around him, trade Wallace, Camby, Felton, and Crawford (when he becomes available in March) for assets?
Does a semi-rebuild get this team any closer to a title? No, it shuffles the chairs on a wayward ship.
With Brandon Roy finished and Greg Oden’s career having one foot in the grave, the previous core is all but shattered.
If this was the NFL, I’d advocate a semi-rebuild. If this was MLB, I’d advocate adding more pieces. In the NBA, however, rebuilding is necessary except in the rarest of cases — such as the Lakers getting Shaq O’Neal to sign outright as a free agent in the summer 1996 or the Pistons forming one of the most elite defenses in NBA history during the mid-2000s — so holding onto LMA only postpones the inevitable for Portland.
"I Am Mine"
Outside of the Celtics and the Big Three...
…give me one example of the type of rebuild you describe bringing a championship.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
Sonics/Thunder....
On May 22, 2007, the Supersonics were awarded the 2nd pick in the 2007 NBA Draft, equaling the highest draft position the team has ever held. They selected Kevin Durant out of Texas. On June 28, 2007, the SuperSonics traded Ray Allen and the 35th pick of the 2nd round (Glen Davis) in the 2007 NBA Draft to the Boston Celtics for rights to the 5th pick Jeff Green, Wally Szczerbiak, and Delonte West. On July 11, 2007, the SuperSonics and the Orlando Magic agreed to a sign and trade for Rashard Lewis. The SuperSonics received a future second-round draft pick and a $9.5 million trade exception from the Magic. On July 20 the SuperSonics used the trade exception and a second-round draft pick to acquire Kurt Thomas and two first-round draft picks from the Phoenix Suns. – wikipedia.com
to add on that, it was a 2008 and 2010 first round draft picks which got them Serge Ibaka(2008) and Cole Aldrich(2010)… but not that any of that has brought them a championship yet…
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 5:33 PM PST up reply actions
Unlike us they had Cho, and other wonderful management freaks
All our scouts and personel get is Armon Jhonson, Luke Babbitt who got drafted before Jordan Crawford,Eric Bledsoe, Laundry Fields, Ebanks,Jeramy Evans, AND FREAKING Luke Harangody, Victor Claver who got drafted ahead of Taj Gibson, Mullens, Beaubois, Douglas,
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:52 PM PST up reply actions
Hey we had that guy too. Not that it mattered.
Yeah it’s rough because PA is so hands on so you have to impress the scouts, GM(whoever it is at the time), and the owner to get on this team. And recently the ones that have done that haven’t shown much.
Wonder why he isn’t as involved with the Seahawks player management…
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions
It did matter
Gerald Wallace for The vanilla gorilla and Trash
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 6:05 PM PST up reply actions
Which he is going to reap the benefits for next year when he gets our pick
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 6:07 PM PST up reply actions
Define blind spot? good or bad?
Bismack looks decent especially if he is 19 like they say he is…
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 6:22 PM PST up reply actions
Even now, I think that Bismack pick was terrible.
Still, we shall see in due time. I’m not sold, though.
"I Am Mine"
How does Bismack look decent?
He’s been terrible save for one game
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
I guess today makes two
Nevertheless, he hasn’t exactly covered himself in glory with his start in the NBA
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
For being the 7th pick in the draft you got me there he isn't a high quality player
but there wasn’t too much quality to be had in last years draft. He definitely seems like a boom or bust project..
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 6:35 PM PST up reply actions
Andrew Bynum was a different story.
Like Bynum, Andre Drummond is someone who a team has to be patient with for a few years. Unlike Bismack Biyombo, those are the type of bigs with worlds of potential on both sides of the ball.
"I Am Mine"
You mean Sam Presti, right?
Remember, Rich Cho was around the Sonics organization for several years during some rough times with Wally Walker and Rick Sund at the helm, so let’s give credit where credit is due: Presti.
"I Am Mine"
Yeah yeah I don't know why I ran with it when he said Cho lol
But yeah Presti should get the credit my bad
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 6:08 PM PST up reply actions
Ah, it's all good.
Sure, Rich Cho stuck around — as he was the one person who survived the front office overhaul when ownership changed hands, as guys such as Wally Walker, Rick Sund, Steve Rosenberry, and David Pendergraft were shown the door — yet, it’s Sam Presti who took the bull by the horns and started the rebuilding process.
"I Am Mine"
They won 34 & 31 games in the 2 years prior to that big blow up...
…not exactly the same risk / reward situation we’re in now.
The Ibaka pick up was good but siting Cole Aldrich as a something to support this strategy seems like a huge stretch. He hasn’t exactly been an impact player on the NBA level.
Westbrook was a good to great draft choice but he was the product of them being a terrible team… just like Durant was.
Even if I give you this example, which as you point out hasn’t won a championship yet, it is by far the exception not the rule. The strategy of making yourself horrible for a period of time in hopes of getting better via the draft is not only unpalatable for most fans but rarely successful.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
We aren't winning any free agent sweepstakes in Portland
And because our roles player filled with “potential” sure just look like plain old role players now, outside of a block buster trade that lands us an Elite talent, we are going to have to get it via draft.
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 6:12 PM PST up reply actions
To add to that, Boston didn't rebuild in 2007; rather, it retooled.
Rebuilding are retooling aren’t one in the same. They’re different.
"I Am Mine"
I am fully aware that they are different circumstances...
…and propose that the Celtics method is a far more successful model to follow.
I know, I know we are not Boston and the popular thought is that Big Names don’t want to come here. Scottie Pippen came here. Steve Smith came here. There is evidence Charles Barkley wanted to come here.
I believe that with Paul’s money, $30mill or so in cap space, a core of at least LaMarcus and Batum and maybe the hope of Greg coming back we have a pretty good chance of luring a big name type talent here to Rip City.
I don’t care about the semantics of rebuilding vs. retooling. I just don’t have any desire to sit through 5 years of losing in hopes of picking up guys in the draft that will make it all better. That rarely works and with our draft history rare looks more like never.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
"and propose that the Celtics method is a far more successful model to follow."
It’s also a rare model. Name one other team that was built similarly. Most teams built through the draft: Lakers w/ Magic, Celtics w/ Bird, Pistons w/ Isiah, Bulls w/ Jordan, Rockets w/ Hakeem, Spurs w/ Duncan, Heat w/ Wade, Lakers w/ Kobe, Mavericks w/ Nowitzki, et cetera.
"I Am Mine"
Really?..
If you look a little deeper that’s not nearly as true as you present.
Those were awesome All World players that were in fact drafted but the teams won championships by adding guys through trades.
Magic wouldn’t have been Magic without Kareem and Kobe wouldn’t have been Kobe without Shaq and then Gasol and Lamarr Odom…both trades. When Hakeem won in 1994 4 out of the next 5 top scorers on that team (Maxwell, Kenny Smith, Clyde and Mario Elie) were trades not draft picks. Nowitzki is the ONLY guy the Mavs drafted on the starting 5. Jason Kidd, DeShawn Stevenson, Shawn Marion, Tyson Chandler and Jason Terry ALL came via trade. 2 of Thomas’ top 9 Pistons teammates of 1990 were drafted and Wade’s Heat had Alonzo Mourning, Shaq, Antoine Walker, Gary Payton, Jason Williams, James Posey, Derek Anderson… Again NONE drafted by the Heat.
I’ll give you the Spurs because of the freak circumstances that allowed them to draft Duncan and The Admiral but Jordan could have had a lot of the same guys we have right now around him and won.
I think you really did more to support my argument then I could have done myself.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
by Ilikeemall on Jan 22, 2012 10:10 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I've always thought LA was better than you
If they are going to rebuild and can get that much for him though, maybe…
I don’t know if I can go through all that again this soon without trying to make a run with LA and Batum. They should be able to get something back for Wallace…maybe not.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
Think about what little Portland had to give up to secure Gerald Wallace's services from Charlotte.
With that, I still think the report of a three-way deal with him going to Orlando for such a huge return was exaggerated. Crash just isn’t worth that on the trade market.
"I Am Mine"
Wallace to NJ
Wallace, Crawford and a 2nd rounder for Lopez, Farmar, Morrow and a 2012 1st rounder. Helps us rebuild and gives them pieces to potentially put around Dwight and D-Will.
Camby to Houston for Thabeet, Flynn, and NY’s 1st rounder.
Felton to LAL for Ebanks and 2 1st round picks.
A few young players and lots of picks.
I wish Camby and Felton were worth that much....
if you throw in Batum to the Houston deal you might be able to get em to pull the trigger because they don’t want to pay both of those guys…
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 3:27 PM PST up reply actions
In what world is Raymond Felton worth two first-round picks and a decent prospect at the 3?
Also, Brook Lopez, 23, possesses 10x the trade value of Gerald Wallace. Wallace’s trade value is not what some people claim, as noted by what little Charlotte gave him up for to Portland last year.
Finally, check out what Marcus Camby was dealt for the last couple times he’s been traded. Denver got a lowly second-round draft pick from the Clippers, while the Clippers got the expiring contracts of Travis Outlaw and Steve Blake from the Trail Blazers.
"I Am Mine"
This one
They aren’t high picks, from the Lakers it’s gonna be about the 25th. And to get a much-needed upgrade at the point guard spot, betcha they’d do it. I don’t really think Ebanks is worth all that much.
Lopez’s value is hurt by his injury. Under normal circumstances, this wouldn’t be a good trade for them. But they are going to be going all in for Williams and Howard. They won’t be re-signing Lopez anyway. And I doubt they have that much interest in paying a rookie. Maybe we let them throw in Petro as well, that just about clears the deck for them to push for a big-three.
The Bobcats were tanking last season. The Clippers were still in Sterling’s stingy days, they just did that trade for the money. They weren’t re-signing him anyway and saved a few mil and got some of PAM.
"They won’t be re-signing Lopez anyway."
That’s not necessarily true. New Jersey won’t extend him prior to Jan. 25th, but they’ll sure as hell tender him a QO and match any offer he receives in restricted free agency this summer.
"I Am Mine"
Not so sure about that
Unless Howard and/or Williams sign elsewhere by that time. They could do a sign-and-trade, but I doubt they are looking for a Howard-Lopez-Williams big three.
Youre trade is garbage
Lopez is almost as good as Aldridge, I can see that trade happening Okur+Lopez+ 1 round pick not like 10 picks and Lopez
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 4:43 PM PST up reply actions
Stats dont lie
Lopez: 246 Games 17.5 points, 7.5 Rebounds, 1.7 Blocks PER:19.33
LA:395 Games: 17.5 Points, 7.5 Rebounds, 1 Block PER:23.57
Get ur stats right before insulting people :)
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 8:28 PM PST up reply actions
No way
Aldridge is way better than Lopez. Stats don’t tell the whole story. Even if they did, Aldridge’s significantly higher per should be a hint.
LMA’s defense is way better, and he’s played for slower-paced teams and more talented teams than Lopez his whole career. And we are talking about career numbers here. You could argue that Lopez was as good before LMA broke out last year sure. Allen Iverson must be one of the best in the league right now with his averages of 26.7 points and 6.2 assists.
Aldridge was way better than Lopez last year, and this year Lopez hasn’t even played.
Try not mixing career numbers and season totals before being smug
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
LA's career PER is 23.57?
We wish.
He’s used career totals then LA’s PER from this year and BroLo’s from last year. If you are gonna mock people for inaccuracies, you should probably be accurate IMO. He wasn’t.
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
Sure is, which would actually help his argument
That part I find funny.
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
Ahh sorry didn't notice the PER differences.
I’m not a PER fan so I basically gloss right by it.
by Timmay! on Jan 22, 2012 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think you "must" trade LMA to rebuild...
…as a matter of fact I think rebuilding around something…like LaMarcus… is a better plan.
Rebuilding strictly through the draft seems like a humorous option considering our recent history in the draft. Keeping LMA, Batum, Wes and a few of our cheaper potential guys like Nolan and Williams, bringing in Freeland , keeping the Rhino and using the cap space we’d have in that situation to get a couple more pieces would make the rebuild a much faster and more successful proposition.
The idea of tearing it down and getting picks for the next decade so we can rebuild the team over the course of 6-8 seasons is not only a huge risk but a guaranty of 5 years of sub-standard basketball. Not exactly a fans dream come true or an acceptable business model for a guy like Paul Allen.
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
Exactly
We should play through Felton, Wallace and Crawford, camby to increase their value. We then package these guys to a contender who is going all out to appease a star. You have to find young talent and picks. It’s difficult but doable, especially on teams with redundant players. You need a threeway with contender and a team with skill set issues. I still think we could find a way to get curry in gs.
If we rebuild
I’d rather do something like this (although it would have to wait till the offseason when we have open roster spots).
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Instead of that,
how about we just steal some of the genius scouts/assistant GMs out of their front office with Paul Allen’s money and then we don’t even have to tank to rebuild because they can find all-star players with the 58th pick in the draft. and maybe grab tiago splitter because they aren’t playing him enough and kawhi leonard cause he reminds me of wallace.
Leonard is a stud
Even if ends up a mediocre bench guy the rest of his career, I will maintain his awesomeness.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
This team won't win a championship as constructed
Rebuilding from scratch won’t win one either with the current NBA business model. So why do it.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
I see his point
Let’s play a game of “let’s pretend”.
Let’s pretend you have two choices. Stay the course with minor rebuilding, or blow it up.
If you stay the course, you have a 0.50 chance of making the playoffs at least 5 times in the next 10 seasons. But a 0.05 chance of winning a championship.
If you rebuild from scratch (getting value for your good players in trade, not pulling a Rasheed and trading when your trading partner has the advantage), you have a .15 chance of making the playoffs at least 5 times in the next 10 seasons, but a 0.15 chance of winning a championship in the next 10 years (based on the luck of the draft year and lottery as much as anything).
That’s really the key to this whole thing: Would you rather have a noticeably higher chance of enjoying regular playoffs, or a slightly higher (but still very low) chance of actually building a contender?
by Timmay! on Jan 22, 2012 8:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Your vote is not the kind of vote that the management should entertain.
You don’t count yourself as a fan of the team, and you spend no money on tickets.
Them’s the facts, Jack.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Jan 22, 2012 9:42 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
They'll certainly lose money on ticket sales and merchandise during a rebuild
But I’m primarily discussing what each fan would prefer, not what the team would do. For many (almost all) NBA teams, a protracted stretch of playoff appearances will be more profitable (if they are) than a rebuild with a small hope of winning a championship.
But that’s moving the goalposts. The question is “what would you prefer”, not “what makes the most sense for the team?”
"They'll certainly lose money on ticket sales and merchandise during a rebuild"
From a financial standpoint, that’s understandable. It’s far easier to sell tickets and push merchandise for an above average squad compared to a team in tank mode that only the diehards want to see.
"I Am Mine"
PA was reportedly vehement about not letting the playoff streak end in the 2000's
I think it was a sense of pride, but I also think it was about the dependable yearly revenue.
Eventually he didn’t have control over that as the team fell apart down the stretch and just missed. Wasn’t long before they rebuilt for (at the time) clear reasons. The team was a mess.
The percentages in your scenario are probably accurate...
…and if they are the difference in the likelihood of actually winning it all isn’t big enough in either case to risk 5 years of poor play.
But that’s just my opinion…
#7... GO BLAZERS!!!
I think either answer is perfectly reasonable, honestly.
There are definite benefits to each. There is no ability to know the right answer, often even in retrospect unfortunately.
True, sometimes rebuilding works and other times retooling does the job.
The problem, however, is a small-market team like Portland doesn’t have the same options available to retool like the big-market teams.
"I Am Mine"
They've been very successful retooling before, in 1990 and 1999
Which will influence opinions about retooling, and understandably so.
But retooling gets tougher if the “superpower” concept continues, of course. I’d argue retooling into a contender is much more complicated now. Boston didn’t retool really, they rebuilt in one crazy offseason. So I don’t see them as a retool. Not to mention that was a very unique “perfect storm” of circumstances either way.
I could totally see the Blazers trying to retool for a couple years, then if unsuccessful, move Aldridge in his prime for some really nice assets/picks in a total shocker move. So in that case, it could be a little of both options.
I don’t expect the Blazers to go into full 20-25 win rebuild mode anytime soon unless either something goes badly wrong, or a future GM gains enough influence to make a huge tactical decision.
"Rebuilding from scratch won’t win one either with the current NBA business model."
That’s patently false.
"I Am Mine"
Show me a team built by tanking and aiming for high picks that has won a championship since the 99 CBA took hold.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
That's ruling out the obvious case: The San Antonio Spurs.
The Heat tanked and got Wade and a title. And of course they didn’t win a title, but the Cavaliers got a huge benefit by tanking. It clearly paid off for OKC.
Dallas did a great job trading for Dirk. And LAL is a different animal for many reasons.
The concept of rebuilding through draft is a reasonable discussion point, IMO. Whether it’s the right one is not an easy answer, but it’s definitely a fair topic.
by Timmay! on Jan 22, 2012 9:47 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
None of these teams willingly traded off veterans to get worse and get their star players.
Absolutely none of them. You’re changing the argument.
You’ve turned your position into “hey we should have a great team already and get lucky in the draft”
dinasour type of guys choir boys
Seattle traded Ray Allen for youth and let Rashard Lewis basically walk for nothing.
Wouldn’t’ve been in a position to draft Russell Westbrook the following year otherwise.
"I Am Mine"
Seattle traded Ray Allen to make sure no one came to the games so they could claim an economic hardship and move the franchise.
You of all people know that.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
Actually, my position is that they got lucky by having their best players injured and got a great draft pick.
So they de facto tanked for a season. I don’t want to rely on injuries, we’ve had plenty of that.
For the record, I also never stated I’m in favor of a rebuild.
"Whether it’s the right one is not an easy answer, but it’s definitely a fair topic."
And that’s understandable. If some people enjoy annual one-and-done playoff appearances, then more power to them. I get that some folks are too impatient to sit through a lean year or two in a rebuild.
"I Am Mine"
Tanking has helped many teams in the past decade.
San Antonio w/ Duncan, Miami w/ Wade, Cleveland w/ LeBron, Chicago w/ Rose, and OKC w/ its two guys.
Also, Boston, L.A., and Dallas each got their core piece — Pierce, Kobe, and Dirk, respectively — one way or another on draft day.
"I Am Mine"
Tanking means intentionally losing, or intentionally weakening your roster so they are not competitive.
That never happened with any of those teams.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
I don't think that's the intent behind the term "tanking" here
Though Cleveland most definitely tanked (in the classic definition) for LeBron.
Cleveland had a super young roster that year.
Except for some reason they kept their vets, and played them too. The only vet they released in order to get younger was Tyrone Hill. They traded for Darius Miles in an attempt to get better, and dumped Lamond Murray for future picks.
Being a horribly built team is not the same as trying to be horrible.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Jan 22, 2012 10:09 PM PST up reply actions
Head Coach John Lucas admitted the Cavs tanked to get LeBron.and sell the team.
There were tons of rumors about the intent of management that season.
by Timmay! on Jan 22, 2012 10:17 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Another strategy (which I've been advocating for a while now)
is to make a run at either Williams or Howard should they remain free agents this off season. Or, for the risky types, make a run at both. I forget the exact math on it at the moment, but clearing everyone off the books (Felton, Camby, Oden gone; Wallace opts out; no new contract for Batum) opens up ~33 million if the cap is at 60 million next season. Convince them both to take less then the max a la Miami and you’ve got yourself a contender.
Okay, signing both would never happen, but the Blazers will have ~25 million in cap space (with Batum and you know he’ll get overpaid) and could sign Williams, for example, pick up a few role players and give Joel Freeland a starting spot next to Aldridge.
The team should at least take a shot at free agency. If it doesn’t work out, they need to be smart enough not to overpay just to fill the roster and they can still go either the total rebuild route or the perennial first round exist route.
Anyway, I’m with you AK. I’d rather see the Blazers go for the ring then just drift along as a slightly above average team.
#7
It would be pretty hard NOT to win a title in the next 5 years
with a starting 5 of Williams, Matthews, Wallace, Aldridge, and Howard.
I can see D-Will doing it, but not Howard. And they want to play together, so the only way we even get a remote shot at D-Will is if LAL sign and trades for Dwight. And even at that, I think the Knicks and Dallas would still present interesting opportunities for Williams.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
hahahahaha thats a joke trade lamarcus
oh come on you guys trade lamarcus i mean none of this is going to happen that we talk about but saying trade lamarcus is just plain stupid and paul allen would NEVER let that happen ever!! NEVER he knows who butters his bread.
a lot of this trade stuff doesn't make a bit of sense to me
but maybe I’m missing something.
Trade LMA? really? If you’re going to trade him, you should hope you’re getting something better, not a sideways trade for three guys that hopefully equal his production.
I’ve heard “trade Batum for a first rounder”…But then you spend three years nursing a guy with big potential to eventually end up with…BATUM 2.0!
Wallace is great but I’d say it’s okay for him to go if we can fill gaps.
Crawford = see ya! Gawd knows I don’t want to hang his jersey up in the rafters the way Nate does.
Felton can go.
Camby is the man…but also the old man and we do need to fill that need.
some trading makes sense…some I just don’t get
crawford had no
training camp and in some of the games this year we wouldnt have been close if it wasnt for him i like crawford i like our team they just have been in a slump they will get out of it
Ok 3 team deal
Portland, golden state, lakers.
Gs gets Gasal
Lakers get Felton, Wallace, Camby, udon
PDX gets curry, Beidrens, world peace.
This makes gs a playoff team
Lakers make one more run with a full team, quality at every position.
We get pgtf, a big to clog the lane and peace on earth.
ugh please not the player formerly known as Ron Artest
he’s gone so far downhill over the past few years. Ivan Johnson even managed to take his spot as the craziest player in the NBA.
Who cares
Hes a throw in. It’s worth it to grab curry. He can pass and is a deadly shot. Perfect for Aldridge and the kick out.
Ya and with our luck
that could mean trouble LOL
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:28 PM PST up reply actions
So you should be
| 23.1 | .647 | .605 | 15.6 | 28.3 | 21.9 | 6.7 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 17.8 | 20.7 | 118 | 100 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 2.2 | .214 |
Why Gay is an athletic freak
untested of Gerald Wallace clap clap clap
Lets go Gay lets go Gay clap clap clap
Wallace leavs this 2012 summer
And it gives them the flexibility to resign Gorge Hill, Roy Hibert, and maybe a Mini Supper star
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 5:40 PM PST up reply actions
A supper star?
But both Z-Bo and Felton are in long term deals…
by Batumshakalaka on Jan 22, 2012 8:57 PM PST up reply actions
If
The lakers would be willing to give up gasol for the Wallace/Felton/camby package gasol could pull us a pgtf. What we need is a star at the PF and pg. build around those two positions. Having PF and sf doesn’t work. We need someone that can get Aldridge the ball and take a shot if it’s a kick out. Matthews and batum can work off of those two players. ideally Matthews would be someone who can break down a player, so elliot might end up being the solution. At center you just need someone who can clog the lane and shoot a bit.
Camby, Wallace, and Felton
Not to mention the Big Babb, for Ellis and some bad salaries? Heck no.
Trade for Howard
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=77ara9e
Right now the Magic are playing the "we are not trading our supper star game’ to pressure teams to offer more then what they should offer. With Howard with us this season he will love the fans, he would sign like a 4 year 95 Million extension. And we will all be happy.
Blake is worth
4 million a year, if Kwame Brown is worth 8 Andris is worth 16 million to get an all right center these days in the NBA it will cost you a lot
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 9:51 PM PST up reply actions
hey this one deserves a second look
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=88pq89x
although at first it looks like the blazers are shafting the other teams, it makes sense.. PHX wants to get value for Nash, they get a good piece to start with Felton and move their starting PF a little closer to the hoop while getting rid of the frustrating Frye, DET needs to shake up a little so a one year rental of Camby and a unloading of Villanueva’s contract is great…. while PDX upgrades at the two positions of most concern, keeping all of our wing weapons and giving them new pillars of stability in a pass happy and championship motivated Nash and a hard working center in Monroe who will now be on a team of proven winners instead of a flux team. Crazy Old Ben Wallace is an afterthought, but we seem to do alright with cagey vet post guys, and suredly Mike Rice will confuse Ben and Gerald once or twice
or we could
just straight sign Aaron Brooks after his Chinese adventures are over and replace Camby next year
by therobophobe on Jan 22, 2012 7:55 PM PST up reply actions
I don't see detroit trading out greg monroe
it would be great if they did and I could go for that trade with nash as a rental. but even if joe dumars might be bad enough to do that at this point, i doubt he will.
even with the defense of
“at least I got that 8 million dollar corpse off the bench by unloading Villanueva” position?
by therobophobe on Jan 22, 2012 8:02 PM PST up reply actions
maybe a phoenix unprotected first round draft pick for this year
could justify it. but that won’t happen.
Them trading Monroe is like us trading LA
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 8:02 PM PST up reply actions
Ben Gordon could relay help the Outside shooting
We dont mind his big contract
by BestBlazerFan on Jan 22, 2012 8:04 PM PST up reply actions
who has a center
thats promising yet doesn’t fit in with the plans? my short list is jason thompson, biedrins, bargnani, monroe, obviously dwight howard, i dono
by therobophobe on Jan 22, 2012 8:18 PM PST up reply actions
Not a bad idea
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=73wewuu
Gets rid of one of their boneheads and expensive contract, and gives them some very much needed veteran leadership and defense. Also, both are essentially ECs, so it might open them up for a run at Howard.
by Batumshakalaka on Jan 22, 2012 9:09 PM PST up reply actions
Monroe? Really?
I believe he is in there for the long-term. They expanded his offensive role and is doing a good job adapting to it. For how young he is and cheap, i’m sure they want to keep him.
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 22, 2012 9:29 PM PST up reply actions
Those'd be revolting deals for Detroit and Phoenix.
Go post that slop on a Pistons or Suns blog and see the reactions unfold in front of your very eyes.
"I Am Mine"
by AK1984 on Jan 22, 2012 9:44 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
you are hilarious
"I told somebody to stop crying," Pendergraph said after the game. "Actually, I told them all to stop crying."
by cornplant on Jan 22, 2012 9:33 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
that is what i said. stop repeating me
"I told somebody to stop crying," Pendergraph said after the game. "Actually, I told them all to stop crying."
by cornplant on Jan 23, 2012 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs

by 







































