Game 5 Preview: Portland Trail Blazers versus Oklahoma City Thunder
Game Time: 5:00 p.m. Pacific TV: CSNNW
One of the features of this compressed season is that games just keep on coming. Unfortunately for the Blazers their narrow road loss to the Los Angeles Clippers on Sunday is followed by an even tougher game against the Oklahoma City Thunder on Tuesday. Blazer fans started to get excited when their team went 3-0 to start the season. How about the Thunder who are, at the time of this writing, 5-0 heading into a Monday game against the struggling Mavericks? OKC has already beaten Dallas, Memphis, and Orlando. They've won on the road and at home. They're a legit threat in the West, maybe not the elite of the elite but good enough to use their name and "Conference Finals" in the same sentence without making anybody blink. They're not talking about playoff seeding but about how far they'll go once they get there. That alone highlights the difference between these two teams.
Kevin Durant is Mr. Everything for the Thunder, obviously. He's producing again this season to the tune of 27+ points per game, 7 rebounds, 4 assists, and incredible 55% shooting from the field, 50% from the three-point arc. Not that he needs them, but he also draws 8 foul shots per game and hits 80% of his free throws. Word has it every time he looks up into the crowd you hear a loud "Bling!" and a minty-fresh sparkle shines out from his teeth.
The bad news for everybody outside of Oklahoma City is that Durant's fellow Superfriends are also playing well and seamlessly. Just in case you were thinking of bringing some Kryptonite to try and deal with the MVP here comes James "Aquaman" Harden, Kendrick "Wonder Woman" Perkins, Serge "Green Lantern" Ibaka, and Wonder Twins Thabo Sefolosha and Nick Collison. Harden's three-point shot has been a little off and Ibaka has been slightly shy in his rebounding. That's pretty close to all the bad you can say about this group...or at least all the bad that matters. They field defender, rebounders, and feeding off of all the attention given to Durant they're contributing to the team's collective (and amazing) 48% shooting percentage. In fact of the players just named only Harden is shooting below 50% from the field. Most importantly they know their roles and play them while still sporting enough talent to ring you up if you get in their wheelhouse, as Portland has previously experienced with Ibaka on multiple occasions.
The one guy not mentioned so far, Russell "Batman" Westbrook, is slumping so far. His per-minute production in points and assists has taken a dive. His field goal percentage is in the toilet. His three-point percentage is even farther down than that. His turnovers are also up. He's still stealing the ball and rebounding, but that's it. Westbrook has been a thorn in Portland's side. The Blazers have actually been able to manage Durant well but Westbrook has then received a free ticket to rip the joint apart. That probably paints this as his resurgence game. But him continuing to struggle would make the Blazers' job exponentially easier. The take-home point is this: even with their second-best player producing some of his worst numbers in years the Thunder haven't lost. That's scary.
Portland might be able to glean some hope in the Thunder's failure to dominate opponents. They've won but one game by double-digits, three by four or fewer points. On the other hand that super-efficient offense has been married to decent defense. OKC has won in the 90's and the 100's so it's not like you can grind to make them vulnerable. Portland is the more susceptible of the two, struggling in the halfcourt while the Thunder simple opt for Durant, Ibaka, or a toss to an open shooter. The Thunder will turn over the ball, perhaps allowing a window for Portland's opportunistic defense...providing, of course, the Blazers can take care of the ball themselves. Oklahoma City has a deeper, more proven bench overall. Harden has been playing out of his mind as the 6th man, partially nullifying Portland's usual bench advantage in the 6 and 7 spots. The normal mantra in situations like this is "A cohesive team can beat a superstar." The problem is, the Thunder are the more cohesive team and are more experienced together.
In short, there just aren't many outs for Portland in a road game like this. The Blazers have to hope Durant's performance against them strays once again to the mundane and then smother everybody else with their starting lineup defenders. If the Thunder get even a couple other players off or feast on easy buckets from the break or offensive rebounding while the Blazers are distracted Portland will have a hard time winning. The Blazers will have to take advantage of every opportunity--forcing turnovers, offensive rebounding, running--plus hit their shots all while keeping a lid on OKC's offense. That will take, by far, Portland's best game of the season...a level of effort, focus, and production we've not yet seen this team achieve.
Read about the OKC story at WelcometoLoudCity.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
97 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Alright,
I’m excited, let’s hope our guys show up for this one.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
This was the game I thought would be our first loss, or our toughest test
Clips beat OKC to it. A win would say alot about this team, but so would a loss. To win, we need our best performance of the season, better than weve been in our first 4 games. I have faith that we will bring some heat to the mound. We have a really good team and I think we will win.
GO BLAZERS!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 2, 2012 10:24 PM PST reply actions
didn't OKC lose tonight?
Maybe they were too distracted with the Fiesta Bowl.
Which reminds me… Ducks>Cowboys, I don’t care what the polls say.
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jan 2, 2012 10:25 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions 1 recs
They did and will be out for revenge tomorrow.
"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth
by KeepItCopacetic on Jan 2, 2012 10:45 PM PST up reply actions
Ducks > Stanford and Wisconsin too.
Porter, Drexler, Kersey, Williams, Duckworth. The greatest starting 5 ever.
USC>Ducks
LSU>Ducks
Sorry, I’m just a bitter Beaver Fan having a bad day.
by unblindloyalty on Jan 3, 2012 10:22 AM PST up reply actions
better a Rose Bowl than a Natty
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
because of playoffs
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
by 92wastheyear on Jan 3, 2012 10:43 AM PST up reply actions
Wallace
IS gonna be angry after last game. X Factor of the game for me.
Shuts down Durant again.
i wanna see the Blazers click on all cylinders. I hope this is the game they do it.
by foxtrotportland on Jan 2, 2012 10:29 PM PST reply actions
If we lose to Thunder on the road
that would be nothing to be ashamed of. Hopefully we can put together a more complete game than we did against the Clips. Hope we can get Aldridge more involved and that the guards stop trying to do everything themselves. I just hope it’s a good game, and then I hope we can come back home and beat the L#$k%^s.
by desperationshot on Jan 2, 2012 10:29 PM PST reply actions
It's one thing to be the major underdog
Another thing entirely to act like it. Whatever happens happens but OKC has lost to worse teams at home than the Blazers and they will likely do so again this season.
That is probably the hope!!!!
The Blazers play better as the underdogs usually.
Reading Dave’s preview, makes me wonder why we should even show up.
Everybody knows that OKC is the better team, but Portland can make it a contest if they play smart ball.
Although it is easy to say that OKC will win in a blow-out over the Blazers, we have yet to see Portland play a complete game; is this the game they put it all together? Is this the game Felton shows why he is the starting point guard over Smith and Crawford? Will LMA finally get his legs under him? will Camby show Dave that he is as good as Kendrick “Wonder Woman” Perkins? Will Gerald school Durant? Just too many questions that hasn’t been answered in this young season to count Portland completely out, although that is a safe way to predict to save face.
I at least give Portland a chance; I at least have hope that the underdogs prevails; I at least think it will be a ball game, not that the Blazers are ever guilty of mailing it in, I think they will at least show Dave why they are a NBA team and not a high school team, but who knows, maybe Dave is right in telling us that there is no use having hope, no use playing the game and we should just concede and head for the plane. For me, I am looking forward to a great game against two worthy opponents.
hg
by BBK on Jan 3, 2012 3:35 AM PST up reply actions
Dave is on a bit of a temperance crusade
Which isn’t a bad thing…
This Blazer team is a bit of an enigma…it has obvious strengths and weaknesses that may or may not translate into critical factors for wins or losses….
It’s just that this team seems to still lack an identify built around a definitive strength – what do they know they do well – and do they have the focus and will to impose their strength on the opponent?
Until they answer that question, we are going to see games like #3, where they win against the grain, and games like #4, where they don’t figure out what they do until too late….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
I agree and I don't really give us good odds either
It’s just hard for me to see the point of “cowering before OKC’s awesomeness” so to speak. What’s the point? Make them prove it.
I always just chalk it up to Dave's reverse psychology
some of the bleakest previews I can remember (@ Boston, @ Miami, @ Orlando, vs. Chicago, vs. Miami, etc…) turned out to be wins or extremely close games that could have gone either way.
It’s usually a “if those teams do X, Y, and Z and play the way they want to the Blazers will have a hard time winning” type of preview. Well yeah, they’re really good teams. You have to keep them from doing everything they want to do, do what you want to do, fight, scrap, claw, etc… How else do you preview a game against an elite team when we have not entrenched ourselves in that same eschelon?
Take it for what it’s worth, they play the games for a reason but Dave still does us a great service by writing these previews.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
Probably a good way to look at it
Reverse jinx that is.
Not expecting a win...
But the Blazers will be more rested, and seem to play with a spark against OKC that is not returned in kind.
I had the Blazers at 5-3 a week from now and still winning 40, so, it’s far from a must win…
I wish we had Durant
I know sour grapes, but seriously.
!!!o o!!!
OMG I just jizzed in my France
OMGrandpa
zing!
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Jan 3, 2012 10:18 AM PST up reply actions
Superfriends
Kendrick “Wonder Woman” Perkins
I could see maybe ‘The Incredible Hulk’ or something. Wonder Woman sounds like something to provoke a fight hoping to get an ejection. Or was that just to see if anyone was paying attention?
No, he actually plays Wonder Woman in the upcoming film.
Pick up a People magazine every once and a while, geez.
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
by Y5k on Jan 2, 2012 11:29 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I find optimism in this
If OKC is the Superfriends, Blazers are the Avengers. And, as everyone knows, the Avengers are way better than the Superfriends. Ergo, Blazers win by at least 12.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
LMA is Captain America
Felton is Ant Man
GW is the Hulk
Camby is Iron Man
We$ is Thor
Batum is Spider Man
Someone get Nate an eyepatch.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
Thunder are very beatable.
Their defense is still suspect and their shooters, yes, even the “chosen one” Kevin Durant, go cold just like anyone else’s. This will also be the second of a back to back for OKC, the first of which tonight against Dallas exposed some of their vulnerabilities (I hope the Blazers spend some time in the visitors’ locker room at Chesapeake Energy Arena reviewing tape of that game). Wallace will have a big night on both ends; no way he’s a non-factor two games in a row. This is by no means an assured win but nor is it an assured loss. Let’s get this one!
Gut check time.
Got to minimize sloppy passes. Focus is key.
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
The unforced errors are the one thing that has me seeing red
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 3, 2012 12:37 AM PST up reply actions
We beat them solidly
Last April 98-91. Durrant held to 25, LA had 32, Batum 19. Brandon only scored 4 pts in 14 min. We have a better team now than we did. If we play like we did first half against Sac or 2nd half Denver, we can beat these guys.
Like to see LA start to dominate again.
Yes, it has been said that Portland needs to play a solid 48 minutes.
Although OKC is a better team by far then the Clippers at this moment, don’t forget who CP3 is; don’t forget who the New Darling "Griffin is; don’t forget who Butler is. The Clips were in a must win at home mode and played a very smart ball game by slowing the Blazers down. Nevertheless this is two completely different style games. Everything Dave says is true, but we play much better against OKC style of predictable games then the unproven Clippers team with just as many stars.
So yes, if we play for 48 minutes we can walk away with pride, and maybe a win.
That is my hopes.
hg
by BBK on Jan 3, 2012 3:50 AM PST up reply actions
Wallace always pwns Durant
He’ll go for 40 again.
Porter, Drexler, Kersey, Williams, Duckworth. The greatest starting 5 ever.
I hope Nate got the memo that the best way to defend Durant is to deny him the ball as much as possible
Wallace and Batum should be an effective tandem in that regard.
#7
by Magnum on Jan 3, 2012 12:06 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Ah yes, I was looking for you
This has nothing to do with the game preview, but I wanted to get your opinion on Manu’s hand injury. As you were a big Spurs booster leading up to the season, do you think they can survive long enough and then bounce back when Manu returns? Or is it pretty much the beginning of the end?
#7
This will be bad.
Who’s there to take Manu’s minutes … James Anderson? Danny Green? Gary Neal? Cory Joseph?
Heck, even ex-Spur Michael Finley is evening talking about a comeback.
http://aol.sportingnews.com/nba/story/2012-01-01/michael-finley-eyes-return-to-nba
None of those are viable solutions, though. As a result, the Spurs will struggle for the next month or two. Bad times for San Antonio. Bad times, indeed.
"I Am Mine"
On the bright side, it was the 5th metacarpal on the left hand.
If you are going to choose one of the metacarpal bones to break, that might be the least functional; for a right-handed basketball player.
Ready for Durant getting lots of fouls as he flops on the drive to the hoop. Hopefully now Westbrick will
be getting called for lots of charges when Kurt Thomas gets in the game.
not very loud over in welcometoloudcity.com
they got like no fans there, but I suppose the farmers over in Oklahoma aren’t very acquainted with the Internet.
Yeah!
I bet they are stuck doing lame things like playing football with their buddies, riding horses, or are out dancing with girls. Haha! Stupid OKC losers!
Proud to be a Republican.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
by staylost on Jan 3, 2012 2:08 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
As a Kansan, I would appreciate if you not propagate false stereotypes about my
part of the country. This really isn’t a bad place to live. I have never lived on a farm, and am fully connected to the world, thanks.
"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth
by KeepItCopacetic on Jan 3, 2012 3:33 PM PST up reply actions
Kansas is the third worst state in America.
But at least Ohio believes in science, and Florida has good fruit orchards.
Kansas doesn’t even get a good Springsteen album.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
I appreciate your wisdom.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
It's a good thing we got our one humiliating loss this season out of the way already
…we only have to deal with one of those, right?
"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez
True. OKC is so good now that they are expected to win. I hated losing to them before because you don't want to lose to
overrated teams. There should be no pressure to beat this team.
Unlikely.
After we went 3 and 0 last year we had about what, 6 embarrassing losses in a row?
hg
by BBK on Jan 3, 2012 3:54 AM PST up reply actions
Oh really???
Now it is turn-over felton that slows down the up-tempo. Is Blazer fans ever going to learn the truth that it takes a whole team, of every type player, and both up-tempo and half court playing. Or, why does all wins and losses always have fingers pointing. It takes a team to win and it takes a team to lose. enough said.
hg
by BBK on Jan 3, 2012 4:54 AM PST up reply actions
I think he's saying because our All Star wasn't 100 percent.
Key injury to key guy, that sort of thing.
OH!!! Sorry, my bad.
Yes it does take time to recover from key injuries, but one of those losses was created by Outlaw. Which doesn’t say much for the rest of the team.
hg
I'll repost my thoughts from the Adande link in the main area
This incarnation of the Blazers has enough veteran leadership to offset a lone knucklehead
At center alone the team has Camby and Thomas. Then he could look up to Aldridge as a guy closer to his age that just got the big raise that Cousins wants. Then, of course, there is Nate who still has a little Sarge in him.
I think it’s worth taking a chance. The team needs a center in the worst way. The team need more talent, too. As good as Aldridge is he isn’t a game changing superstar. I don’t think Cousins is a future superstar either, but even moderate development in talent and maturity would put him in the All Star conversation.
The obvious player to trade is Batum (+minor filler) since I assume the Kings want youth and upside, but Wallace for Cousins and Garcia works
#7
by Magnum on Jan 3, 2012 4:52 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Wow. Just wow
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
by Y5k on Jan 3, 2012 9:14 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I really hope this was a joke
No way I’d make that trade
I wouldn't underestimate our guys!
I believe they will surprise a few people against OKC. Looking forward to watch the game and the best team in the NBA. Go Blazers!
by BrandonRoy4ever on Jan 3, 2012 8:10 AM PST via Android app reply actions
Andre Miller used to take Westbrook to school
Not sure Felton matches up too well against him….hopefully Jamal is ready to roll tonight.
Actually, all I remember was Westbrook blowing by our guards
Trust and look for each other
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 3, 2012 12:44 PM PST up reply actions
Westbrook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcackzHbBT0
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
FYI This is what I would like to see re Westbrook
I am hoping that Westbrook totally implodes tonight …and I am not talking about arguing with Ibaka or something …I mean he actually goes insane and starts playing for us mid-way thru the 1st quarter …and has to be flagrantly fouled by his own team (I am thinking a clothesline by Durant at about the foulline)
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
ZorgonB of loud city is like the opposite of Dave;
Still, I’m predicting another significant victory for the Thunder. Until Greg Oden gets back, the Blazers will only win one out of every 7 or 8 games against the Thunder, when their offense happens to click on all cylinders. Otherwise, get ready to count this as yet another solid home win.
Yeah ...good call Zorgon
Cause that nice 7-9 record against us in the Durant era really supports that.
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Catch the injury report?
Lastly, it might be a good idea to keep an eye on the injury reports to see whether Sefolosha or Cook will play today. Both are sick with the flu, and Sefolosha re-aggravated a heel injury that he’s been battling since opening day.
Every little bit helps!
maybe this is why the only people on his blog
are blazer fans.
by AR-15 on Jan 3, 2012 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Hubris. Pure hubris.
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
by Y5k on Jan 3, 2012 10:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Can't you speak english??!!
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
by 92wastheyear on Jan 3, 2012 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
OK ...
Him so cocky!
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
by Y5k on Jan 3, 2012 12:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
He really is
"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"
Blazers will win tonight only if they have less than 15 turnovers (which I think they'll be able to do!)
Nate won’t let that continue. Go Blazers!
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Jan 3, 2012 10:16 AM PST reply actions
We always play pretty well against the Thunder.
I know they’ll be out for blood and at home after the loss last night, but I still say it’ll be a good, close game.
In my mind, Thunder are favored, but only slightly.
I don't care who we are playing.
We need to pick up the pace.
I am a big Nate fan and appreciative of all that he has done for the Blazers in his time here but the game vs. the Clippers had me scratching my head.
In our opening 3 wins, we had shown ourselves to be a new team with new features that every opponent was going to have to deal with. We had been working with the 15 second shot clock and had streaking guards after every opponents shot.
The Clipper game was a throwback to the “old” Nate grinding style and I yelled at my television for 4 quarters of horrifying mid-range jumpers.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why Nate would go away from what was CLEARLY our key to success. My only hope was and is that Nate was saving gas for tonights game vs. the Thunder.
I hope every possession is at absolute full speed, we get over 110 pts., and we rack up win #4.
we can still win........
The other team took transition away from us maybe?
Clips made sure to not let Wallace get by them
Trust and look for each other
by Hermistonmelons on Jan 3, 2012 12:46 PM PST up reply actions
I don't think they took it away
as much as we didn’t force the issue.
It looked to me like a different team than the first 3 games.
Just hoping that we get the team that played the Nuggets and not the team that played the Clips.
we can still win........
by GERONIMOSINTHEHOUSE on Jan 3, 2012 3:02 PM PST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
OKC GOT PWNED!
That’s the way to do it!
by BrandonRoy4ever on Jan 3, 2012 7:35 PM PST via Android app reply actions

by 




































