How About A Trade Drawer? 1-16-12
I decided to make this trade drawer because almost every post conversation I read lately is turning into trade talk. Thats great and fun and nice and stuff. Lets keep it going. Now we got a spot to do it in.
Okay, we all could agree on this statement, we need a legit center. Dave hinted at an interesting possibility today at the end of his recap saying that it was possible Okafor could be an asset NOR would want to get rid of. Well, that really intrigues me personally, because he is the type of center we would need. Now, me personally, I dont know all the ins and outs of contracts, and all the mumbo jumbo that goes down with a trade. But realistically, what is a trade that would be in the realm of possibility where we might land Okafor, realistically whats his value? Some folks have said GW for Okafor straight up. Dont know if that works or not.
Okay another one Ive been hearing is we need a PG. 2 names worthy of mentioning Ive heard bounce around the campfire are Deron Williams and Steve Nash. Lets start with Steve. Everyone knows hes good. Right now hes avg 10.1 ast per game, which is #1 in the NBA tied with Rondo. In contrast he has the 10th highest ast/to ration in the NBA. But hes also avg 13pts and had a 21per! Dudes good. To trade for him PHX is gonna want assets, probably more than hes worth IMO. Because of age, we prolly dont want him.But for fun, Who is worth giving up to get Nash?
Now Deron, hes good, we know this man. 18.3pts 8.4ast 3.3rebs 17.64per 1.91ast/to ratio. He has the 4th most ast in the league right now with 101. His value is high! Again like Nash, wed have to give up alot to land Deron. Who would make it worth it? Who would you be willing to give up?
Out of these scenarios, the one where we land a decent center is the one I want to see happen. SO heres my trade that probably doesnt work but I just quickly eyeballed the salaries since the trade machine is down.
We Get:
C Omeka Okafor 12.6million
PF Carl Landry 8.5million
They Get:
SF Gerald Wallace 9.5million
C Marcus Camby 11.2million
and any combination of Eliot, Babbit, Freeland, Smith, Armon, Rhino, CJ, picks, cash
257 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not sexy
BUT It is not that blockbuster deal people look for but Okafor trade listed makes the Blazers better so I could sign off on that.
I have been kicking around this idea as well
It would weaken our strongest position in the SF. But we would have probably the best PF depth in the league, which right now we don’t even have PF depth. Nice thing about GW is he can play both the 3 and 4, Landry is really just a 4. However…..that trade brings us a good C in Okafor, which really sells the idea.
I feel pretty much the same
We need a center plus we could really use a good backup for our main threat LMA so he has some juice left for the playoffs. That seems more important than a pg right now. Also, No matter what GW is a tough player to give up. But he is our most valuable trade asset and we have Batum ready to start.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 9:43 PM PST up reply actions
Ya
at this point we I want to put Batums contract extension off so he keeps playing like the last 2 games. If he doest that every game we really don’t NEED G3.
It would be cool
though unlikely. If we could trade G3, have him opt out next season and resign him. I’m sure that wouldn’t be his perfect situation, but it is mine.
I absolutely want to focus all our power
in acquiring Roy Hibbert in next years free agency, or through a trade. He is the ideal center to pair next to Aldridge for the rest of their careers.
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/218322/Hibbert_May_Prefer_Gamble_On_Restricted_Free_Agency
It may be tough to pull it off in a trade form though, because they are log jammed at both forward spots with Danny Granger, David West, Tyler Hansborough, Jeff Foster & Louis Admundson. If they did lose Hibbert, Indiana is an attractive location as any for an Greg Oden revival, with him being the home town kid.
I absolutely would not give up Gerald Wallace to acquire Emeka Okefor. I think Camby + a first round pick would probably get it done, imo. Not sure I’d give them Batum either, though with Monty & the Hornets would be an ideal landing spot for Nic to get his chance to really flourish as a player.
The idea of a Felton/Crawford for Steve Nash swap is quite intriguing. I’d press Danny Ainge for Rondo if at all possible. The thought of lobs to Aldridge & Wallace makes me a happy man. Sticking with high quality perimeter player, Andre Iguodala is an obvious target, him & Kirk Hinrich fit the defensive mindset type of players that this team needs more of(See Wallace, Gerald).
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I like hibbert but
Hes not as good defensively yet like emeka or even freeland. Personally I say keep freeland but trade anyone else you listed above. Keep felton. And keep gw. He is much more agressive than nic and those two competing for minutes is helping nics game. But gw dives for the ball more something nic hardly ever does.
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 10:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
And dont trade felton
He just needs to find his groove.
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 10:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
One thing that kinda bums me out is Ray ceiling isnt much higher that it already is!
Raymond is playing just below his career averages. Right now this season he averages 11.1pts 6.8ast 2.8rebs 2.6tos and his career #’s are 13.6pts 6.7 ast and 3.4rebs 2.6tos.
Seems to me there isnt much more that Ray is gonna give us.
Unless he has a complete turn around to his game, hes barely shy of what hes averaged over his career. Not holding out for a better PG and trading away Dre was not a good move, atleast it appears that way so far. Even so, I say we need a starting center position more than we need to upgrade Ray at this time.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:10 PM PST up reply actions
Well said.
I wish we had Dre back :\ The “Felton is a better fit because he can shoot from 3” argument is invalid after bricking most his attempts this year.
The thought of Steve Nash running the all the sudden up-tempo Portland Trail Blazers with Gerald Wallace, Wesley Matthews & Aldridge catching alley oops excites me. If we could also acquire a center to defend the paint I like our chances at a 1-2 year championship window.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I wish there was a way to pry Rubio
away from the TWolves. Maybe we can just give them like 4 1st round picks so Kahn can get a a few new PGs that suck.
That ship sailed a while ago.
We shouldn’t be looking to trade for any spaniards. I doubt any of them would want to play here after how things went with Sergio & Rudy.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Its not going to happen though
Rubio is their franchise PG.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
His number are not an issue
his shooting percentage is and that will sort itself out.
He has traditionally been a low forties shooter from inside the arch and a low thirties shooter from outside. This year
.347 fg% .140 3pt%
that will not last. once we is in shape and comfortable with his role he will be fine. I actually expect him to be quite good.
are we talkin about Raymond Felton here?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:16 PM PST up reply actions
talkin' bout practice
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
Eh....
Hes not as good defensively yet like emeka or even freeland.
I’d say he is not quite as good as Okefor man to man in the post but as a weak side defender I’d give Hibbert the edge.
I watched a lot of EuroLeague ball this year, Freeland isn’t close to Hibbert as an NBA defender. Doesn’t have the size or length to bang with the best NBA 5’s like Hibbert does.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
agreed freeland isnt the savior we need
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:11 PM PST up reply actions
We need someone
who can not get completely destroyed by Andrew Bynum or Dwight Howard(Who now apparently wants to be a LA Clipper, they can put together a much better deal then the Lakers…) in a seven game series.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
thats hard though
stat wise Bynum is #2 center under Dwight
Almost all possible centers get burned by Bynum. I think id settle for Okafor. Hibbert is intriguing though. So is Gortat, especially Varejao. I wonder who will be available at the deadline?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:59 PM PST up reply actions
I'd say
Okefor or Kaman
Gortat
Varejao
Dalembert
Jason Thompson
Chuck Hayes
could all be on the table if their teams don’t have a chance at the playoffs.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
cavs aren't giving up varejao.
they’re basically on track to be the 8th seed, and their defense will suffer badly without him. bogut might even be more likely at this point.
I like those options, though. or hibbert in free agency, though i’m pretty sure indiana will match anything that isn’t ridiculous, and we don’t want to pay too much more than he’s worth.
by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 8:45 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
No one deserves the Blazers free agent $$$
more then a 7’2, extremely productive & reliable center.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
bring it on baby!
sounds like a good plan to me, sounds like a good way to spend our money!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 11:38 AM PST up reply actions
I'm down for Hibbert as well.
He is restricted so they may have to really up the ante but I’d think it was worth it. 7’2" and a PER over twenty, he is one of a kind. He can suck up rebounds and score inside taking a lot of pressure off of Aldridge. He should be the number one focus this summer. Deron Williams would be the number two candidate. They’ll have to find someone how can run an offense or can ball handle at the very least. Felton may be Okay to keep but should not be the main guy running the show. If they landed Hibbert they could low ball Felton and bring Miller back to start. Just remind McMillan he has one year left on his contract (next summer) so it would behoove him to let Miller run the offense as he is a lot smarter than him.
HIbbert and Collison would be awesome
Get your big and a up and coming PG. Hibbert is solid if unspectacular and Collison is gonna be another solid UCLA gurad.
by breakerfall on Jan 17, 2012 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
Blazers could offer Hibbert a lot of money
Unfortunately the Pacers can offer him the same amount of money, as well as a longer deal.
Pacers are in a better position than the Blazers are to sign Hibbert to a long contract
Jason Thompson apparently might not get a contract extension in Sactown
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/218321/Thompson_May_Be_Out_Of_Kings_Long_Term_Plans
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
He is like an Aldridge-lite.
before LA made the jump last year. Not sure he has what it take defensively to play at the 5 though.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
i like JT
he is full of potential
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:24 PM PST up reply actions
Varejao anyone?
4th in rebs per game
2nd in off rebs per game
6th rebs per 48min 17.3
similar #’s to Okafor 9.5pts 11.2rebs 18.69per
7.7 million contract
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:23 PM PST reply actions
I'm under the impression
Varejao is an untouchable for Cleveland right now.
with those kinda stats
i can see why
: )
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
A solid idea.
Another is Marcin Gortat http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2758/marcin-gortat
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
PHX is not going to give up Marcin, as the 27 year old is perfect to rebuild around
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 17, 2012 12:40 AM PST up reply actions
he is 27 years old
rebuilding will take at least 2-3 years, especially because they have to get rid of the old guys first. I don’t think that’ll work
markeiff morris (I don’t know if I spelled that right) is doing really well for them, so they’ll rebuild around him.
If we can get Wallace for what we got him for
I don’t see why we can’t get Okefor on the cheap at the deadline, might have to send a draft pick to them though. I’d consider letting Batum go if they send us a pick that could land either local prospect Terrence Jones or Mike Moser.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I'd be concerned about our perimeter defense
in which case I’d much rather have Kirk Hinrich. I think the Hawks are more likely to let him go for a 2nd rounder then the Wolves would for Ridnour. Better fit for us too.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Kirk would be cool
I don’t know that I would be excited about it, but it wouldn’t be a bad move.
I like the thought of his steady play & good defense
over the erratic Felton or the one dimensional Ridnour.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I still love Samuel Dalembert too.
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/991/samuel-dalembert , another trade deadline prospect who could be had after Houston sinks the ship.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
that was one I almost mentioned
good one. I like Sam. He would be great.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:50 PM PST up reply actions
A proven NBA commodity, a great person & reasonable contract.
hes right up there with Okefor/Gortat, in terms of a backup plan if the Hibbert idea doesn’t pull through.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I'd expect Houston to rebound
They’ve played a tough sched, and haven’t gotten as much out of everyone not named Kyle Lowry as they could. They’ll compete for the last playoff spot, and probably won’t trade Dalembert unless it’s for a prime C (e.g. Okafor).
However, Camby has said before that he would only accept a trade to Houston. If we are intent on trading him, Dalembert for Camby straight up would be ideal, but I’m not sure why Houston would do that unless Jordan Hill really breaks out and Dalembert demands a trade.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
I think we need to seriously consider upgrading the roster
through the 2012 draft too. Lots of talent. That Wallace for 4 first rounders sounds real nice(not for this year, but having a chance relive the young/exciting team promise like we had with the former Roy/Oden/Aldridge core, except this time we get it right)
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
4 first rounders is very enticing for draft possibilities
very valuable as trade bait as well
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 11:23 PM PST up reply actions
glad we gotta trade drawer going
the deadline is still 2 months away Mar 15 I believe but hey im sure the phones are always ringing all year long. teams are always talkin. i sure it gets going closer to the deadline but right now i assume fo’s are making preliminary calls, to see who is and who isnt available.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 11:19 PM PST reply actions
the 3 players i dont wanna give up are
nic, wes, LMA-
everyone else should be on the table,
ugh i just wish we knew if oden was gonna make a serious comeback or not. it changes so much if he is, we wait and dont trade for okafor or a center, just ride it out. if oden isnt coming back we need to do everything possible to get the best available center. if oden is coming back we could throw our loot at a badass pg or backup to LMA instead of a center.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 11:33 PM PST reply actions
"ugh i just wish we knew if oden was gonna make a serious comeback or not."
I think that question has already been answered. I’ve said before, it wouldn’t be prudent of management to rely on him for anything. Rather set him free to try to revive his career elsewhere & focus on acquiring a proven center.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
i wonder what Oden trade value is right now?
High or Low? I still think he has a ton of potential to be great but only time will tell on that one. I wonder what other teams think? Sure would be cool to be a fly on the wall during those phone calls.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:46 PM PST up reply actions
It depends on the team.
A team with no center depth at all seems like the ideal spot for an Oden comeback story. Because the pressure will be off Oden. His value could skyrocket if he puts together a couple of good games before the deadline. I’d personally like to see him sign with Indiana after we steal Hibbert from em’ :)
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
My thought is
I hope to see him play again b4 he gets traded away.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:58 PM PST up reply actions
Interesting Ideas
I definitely belong to the camp that says LMA, Matthews, and Batum are our only “untouchables.” These are all young guys that you can still build around. While LMA may not be one of the top tier players in the league, he is certainly All-Star worthy. Nic and Wes may never be All-Star caliber, but they’re young, relatively cheap, and they fill those roster spots nicely. What I think they need to add is another All-Star caliber player, another complimentary player, and to shore up the bench.
What’s important to keep in mind with all of this is in this new era of supposed league-wide fiscal responsibility, the decision to keep or add player depends not simply on their talent or contribution potential, but rather their talent/contibution per dollar spent. That is to say, is it really worth spending $10 million per season on a a player like Wallace when you might be able to spend $6 million per season on a guy like Batum?
Hibbert has been mentioned a lot so far in this thread and rightfully so. He’s a huge presence in the middle (7-2, 260), he’ll tally 10+ points shooting > 50%, grab a bunch of rebounds and block a 1-2 shots night in and night out. His PER is over 20 which is higher than most, if not all the other centers we’re talking about here. He’s young too. At only 25, he probably hasn’t reached his prime yet. Hibbert is a legit All-Star caliber center going forward.
There’s a couple ways the Blazers could go about getting him. First, and probably the most risky, is attempting to sign him in free agency. Portland would have to cut loose of a combination of Wallace, Oden, Felton, and Camby to free up space as Hibbert will likely garner a $10 + million dollar contract. Then they’d have to re-sign Batum. The other way would be to use the above commodities to negotiate a sign and trade with the Pacers. They may want Oden as some means of compensation in losing Hibbert, and Camby’s expiring contract is always nice. The good thing about a sign-and-trade in this scenario is that you may not necessarily have to give up Felton or Wallace. If Hibbert was set on leaving Indiana, the Pacers may just jump at the chance to snag a big expiring contract, a +/- investment in Oden, and a promising prospect like Elliot Williams rather than loose Hibbert to free agency. In the end, if a sign and trade doesn’t work out, at least you haven’t lost anything. You still have your resources to pursue something else. IF the Blazers were able to pull off such a sign and trade, the roster would end up looking like this:
PG – Felton (expiring contract)
SG – Matthews (Tier 2 money)
SF – Wallace (expiring contract)
PF – Aldridge (Tier 1 money)
C – Hibbert (Tier 1 money)
This lineup begs the question of what to do with Wallace and Felton. If Wallace was wanting big money, the Blazers would not be able to sign him. In this instance, it would behoove the team to try to package both Wallace and Felton for a more solid point guard, and maybe a quality backup. The Blazers would be motivated to do this, if say, Felton continued his lackluster performance.
There are some interesting point guard situations brewing out there. Of course there’s the big free agent being Williams, but how realistic is it that Williams would want to come to Portland? Not very. Nash is another big free agent but he’s quite old. You MIGHT get production out of him for a year or two. Not exactly the ideal candidate to fill the role as “point guard of the future.” A free agent point guard who I think will be overlooked because of the big two is D.J. Augustin. Here’s a guy who is young (24), scores 15, dishes out 7 dimes, and who takes pretty good care of the ball (A/T > 3.5). He also shoots 38% (career) from the beyond the arc. The best part? You’d get him at fraction of the cost of a Williams or Nash.
Other considerations out there would be Mike Conley Jr., Jose Calderon, and Tony Parker. All are players Portland may be able to trade for with assets like Wallace and/or Felton, but all will require big money down the road. All of them, save for Conley, are well into their prime years as well.
It makes it hard to figure the exact logistics and finances of these player movements without ESPN’s trade machine up and running, but just for arguments sake, the above moves would place themselves in a position to have a lineup featuring:
PG – Augustin (Tier 2 money)
SG – Matthews (Tier 2 money)
SF – Batum (Tier 2 money)
PF – Aldridge (Tier 1 money)
C – Hibbert (Tier 1 money)
This lineup is young, better than the current one, and likely less expensive. The team would, in all probability, be left under the cap penalties and be able to offer a full mid-level to help shore up the bench.
In short, if the team continues to mire in mediocrity, I would really like to see them pursue Hibbert and Augustin as young, relatively inexpensive pieces to build this team on.
Augustin is really bad.
He’s a worse version of JCrarford minus five or six inches.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 2:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Which Crawford Are You Talking About?
Crawford is 31. Augustin is 24. When you say Augustin is a lesser version of Crawford, are you talking about today’s Crawford, or the Crawford of 7 years ago? Actually, forget that question because you’re wrong on both parts. Normally, I don’t like drawing comparisons between players who fill fundamentally different positions, but since you brought it up…
In their first 4 seasons Augustin has averaged a higher efficiency rating (19 vs. 17.5). They averaged the same amount of points (each about 11), Augustin has averaged slightly more assists, Augustin less turnovers (1.5 vs. 1.8), and Augustin has shot better from the field (41% vs. 39%) and the free throw line. Crawford has slight edges in rebounding and steals, but that’s about it. Certainly, if you had to err on either side, a better case could be made that Augustin has been better thus far.
in their current roles, Augustin is unquestionably fairing much better than Crawford. The former has a PER of > 18 while the latter struggles to stay over 14. Augustin is currently shooting better from the field and from 3-point range. Moreover, nearly all of Augustin’s relevant statistics are on the upswing while the opposite is true of Crawford. No one in their right mind would suggest Augustin is worse than Crawford currently.
Do I think Augustin would go down as the best Blazer point guard ever? No. Do I think Augustin will ever be an All-Star? No.
I certainly believe though, that he is a solid complimentary player (not unlike Matthews) that could be built around a foundation of Aldridge and a star center. Definitely better than what Felton is showing us now. But none of these statistics is even the best part. The key about Augustin is that you could get him for cheap! Maybe even as cheap or cheaper than Matthews! That’s huge when it comes down to those times when you want to spring a little extra to sign that max mid-level.
Agree to disagree then.
Or engage is frivolous personal attacks.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 11:33 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Nothing Personal or Frivolous Here, and Definitely Not Agreeing to Disagree
Just pointing out some general flaws with your statement, that’s all. Saying “we agree to disagree” is creating a logical relativism as if one can’t easily compare objective data pertaining to the differences between Augustin and Crawford.
If you really believe Augustin is worse than Crawford, then stick by it and give support for why you think so. On the other hand, if you’re too disinterested to engage in the discussion, then there’s really no need to make the statement to begin with as such a statement is, by definition, frivolous.
Im not allowed to have my own perspective based off my own criteria now?
Both players have a gunners mentality. Jamal’s best is better than Augustin’s best. Augustin’s team just drafted his replacement. At least Jamal is 6’5". There are lies and there are statistics. I’ll stick with the eyeball test. Jamal is the better player.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 18, 2012 8:28 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I have to give it to Augustin
he is a far superior passer to Crawford, particularly this year with a 7.2/2.5 A/T ratio, as opposed to Crawford 3.2/2, he’s also outshooting Crawford this year % wise.
I'm not ready to crown D.J. Just yet. Let's see him hit some game winners and break fifty points in a game first.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 18, 2012 4:46 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
but the stats don't care about clutch shots
or dominate games. So they don’t matter right?
Fallible Logic
Purvis Short played small forward for the Warriors and tallied a 59 point game. Scottie Pippen never once scored 50 points. By your logic, Short was a better player than Pippen.
Damon Stoudemire scored 50 points for the Blazers one game. John Stockton never once broke the half-century mark. Again, Stoudemire is clearly a better player than Stockton, right?
Still not convinced of the 50 point rule? Tracy Murray, Cliff Robinson, Tony Delk, Allan Houston, Rashard Lewis, Terry Cummings… all guys who have registered 50 points in a game while Kevin Garnett has yet to accomplish the feat once.
I think I’ve made my point. Single game accomplishments whether they be a high point total or a game-winning shot, are ill-effective as the single marker determining who a better player is.
A long record of statistics, especially the rating of what a player contributes to a team, is much more effective which is not surprising why GMs use these tools when exchanging players.
When all is said and done and both players are retired, Crawford may very well prove to have had the better career. But when comparing the two side-by-side on as equal ground as possible, Augustin fares better every time.
You are comparing a lot of guys
who have different roles on a team. Scotty wasn’t a 6th man scorer off the bench, or a #1 option, he shouldn’t have ever had a 50 point game. John Stockton was Robin to The Mail Man’s Batman. KG however was a #1 option for the TWolves but also has always been known as a defensive guy first, Jamal has never been thought of as anything but a pure scorer.
Crawford had plenty of chances to prove
he was a #1 option, though. Augustin also doesn’t have a true 2nd option either. For who he is passing to, his numbers are astounding this year.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Ding Ding! We Have a Winner!
Thank you for corroborating my point! This is exactly what I was getting at. It’s ridiculous to label someone a better player than another just based on single game performances (e.g. 50 points).
I wouldn’t expect Augustin to have a 50 point game any more than I would another player whose primary role is to run the offense and create opportunities for other players.
There are so many other factors like the ones you described (teammates, overall contribution, etc.). This is precisely why Crawford is no more a better player than Augustin for having scored 50 in a game than Tracy Murray is better than KG.
More simply, it’s the exact reason why the Crawford vs. Augustin comparison is a poor one to begin with.
Maybe You Need New Glasses For Your Eyeball Test
Really? Do you want to continue to compare these two players? They play different positions and one has seen his prime years pass by while the other has yet to enter his. The first fallacy is the comparison, in general. But since you insist.
While Augustin does look to score as well as pass, I’m not sure you could qualify him as having a “gunners” mentality. Certainly not if the minimum expectation is the style of play that Crawford exhibits. Just take this season thus far. Augustin is averaging 10 more minutes per game, yet only takes one addition shot more than Crawford. Looking at their first 4 years side-by-side, Crawford averaged a significantly greater number of field goal attempts per minute in nearly all seasons (the only exception being their rookie seasons when the each attempted roughly 0.3 shots per minute).
Not only this, but as has already been clearly established, Augustin is a better distributor and protector of the rock. Not exactly the key characteristics of a “gunner.”
You mention that Jamal’s best is better than Augustin’s best. Not sure what your point is. Last time I checked, you don’t get bonus wins for having a 50 point game.
That’s why it’s important to look at the product as a whole which is where these stats come in. Also not sure by what you mean with “there are lies and there are statistics.” I think what you mean is the expression, “figures don’t lie but liars can figure.” This is a typical stance that those whose argument is weakened by the objective data. To claim that the statistics are misleading due to chance, bias, or confounding.
Looking over 4 seasons certainly provides enough data to remove chance, and bias is eliminated due to the pure transparency of NBA recording. This leaves confounding. Sure, it’s impossible to truly compare head to head the statistics of two players, playing for different teams, supported by different teammates, in remote seasons. That’s where the efficiency and PER scores come in handy. The adjust for confounding variables such as the pace at which the team plays. Are they perfect? No, but they’re the best we’ve got. Undoubtedly better than the “eyeball test” which is just another way to say anecdotal evidence. Of which, is the least reliable form of evidence to support an argument.
In the end, I wouldn’t even try to compare the two as it’s just a bit unfair. That being said, if forced, Augustin has a clear advantage. Will he continue to produce at a higher level than Crawford has? Don’t know. Will he ever have a (meaningless) 50 point game? Don’t care. What I do know and what I do care about, is that the Blazers need to have a better point guard, and Augustin would be a cheap guy that could fill that role.
by JDX on Jan 18, 2012 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Thats just a well written, with many good points.
Rec.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Look you have your opinion. Just don't be a jerk.
I don’t like Augustin’s game. Get over yourself.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 20, 2012 2:37 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Williams
Why doesn’t Williams want to come to Portland? He played in Utah, of all places, and is now in NJ? Hmm. He comes to Portland and he gets 3 teammates who are entering their prime, and It allows McMillan to return to his half court offense.
he wants brooklyn and dwight howard
not portland and the blazers
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 11:34 AM PST up reply actions
he probably isn't getting howard
even if he does he has no decent role players to work with. portland has great second and third options in aldridge and wallace/batum, along with solid role players in matthews, thomas, and maybe smith. if we can get a starting center, then that’d be a solid team
NJ is 1 of 4 teams Howard said hed play for
So I have to assume that NJ still has a chance of landing DH. If Howard doesnt go to NJ then its possible Deron would go to another team, maybe us. I do agree with
“if we can get a starting center, then that’d be a solid team” that is soooo true!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:31 PM PST up reply actions
since New Jersey really has nothing attractive on the roster outside D-will,
and D-Will is probably going to become a free agent and choose where he wants to go next year, i’m assuming Howard isn’t really insisting after the Nets.
Honestly, if Dwight Howard and the Magic were smart, I’d say they should go for a trade to Chicago, who can offer both Noah and Boozer, and who Dwight Howard can automatically turn into a championship team with the scariest defense in the league.
Except Boozer sucks
when he isn’t in a contract year and is way over paid. I’m sure they would like Noah but I’m not so sure they would want Boozer.
if they don't
I’m sure some other team might be willing to gamble on boozer and will trade another asset for the bulls to send to Orlando.
but yeah, they have no need for boozer, ryan anderson is already doing a better job for them at the 4.
actually yeah that'd make sense.
I didn’t think about that. orlando might try to throw in turkoglu’s contract, so moving anderson to the three spot could help a lot. though i don’t know how well he can defend Small forwards.
Yeah, I wondered about that
I don’t know if he has the lateral quickness, but he has a big length and strength advantage at the SF spot. Ideally, his offense would make up for his defense. But with no Howard, that team would need all the defenders they could get.
Though if I were Orlando, I would insist on Noah, Boozer, and Deng, and CHI would have to take back J-Rich and Hedo.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
deng would probably be a stretch for chicago
but I guess they might just go for it if it’ll get them dwight.
the thought of Rose & Howard
on the same team is extremely frightening.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Yeah, Chicago would have close to decade with those two to put together a winner
And the best part is, they could still throw out a starting lineup of Rose, J Rich, Korver, Gibson, and Howard this season with Asik, Hedo, and Rip off the bench.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
They would probably not have the leagues best defense without Deng
Howard would be an upgrade on Noah, but Ronnie Brewer would be the only elite perimeter defender on the roster, and he’s not likely to play more than 24 mins per game.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
yeah, but they still have the best defensive coach in the league
and they could probably acquire a great perimeter defender in trades or free agency.
I dunno, Deng is a great two-way player
I think Crash, Iggy, Wade, and Lebron might be the only more complete wings in the NBA.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
but look at what SVG has done with Orlando's defense
just with Howard and a bunch of sieves on the wing
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
If I'm the Magic
I think the Clippers can present the most interesting offer in the NBA.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
if they're willing to include blake?
definitely but otherwise I don’t see billups, mo williams, or butler being much better than bynum or noah.
that or
Deandre Jordan, a much higher upside center prospect then Noah is.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
he's overpaid
and though he’s got a whole lot of upside on defense, he doesn’t really have it figured out.
Lakers can still make a better offer
The best the Clippers can offer without including Blake is Mo Williams, DeAndre Jordan, and Caron Butler for Howard, Hedo, and Duhon (I’m only using a rough assumption of salary figures, so a real deal would probably look different).
LAL can offer either Pau Gasol or Andrew Bynum, either of which would be better than the Clips deal. But LAL can also offer BOTH in exchange for Howard and Hedo. The team around Kobe and Dwight would suck, probably not as good as the Clips with CP3 and Griffin, but it’s still better for Orlando.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
If your the Clippers
why not give them Griffin, honestly? they are the only team that can give back a true superstar in return & a dominant center is far better then a dominant power forward.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
true, but Griffin sells tickets like no other
and the Clippers have sort of been considered Griffin’s team so far the past few years.
DH and CP3
is scarier then DH and DRose. Can we keep him away from the best guards in the league if possible?
You made it sound like you would send them Jordan in place of Griffin
But, yeah, if it were my team, I’d trade Griffin for Howard in a heartbeat. I don’t know that Sterling would, though. The marginal returns on taking on that salary starts to lose some luster.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Very good post.
I definately like Hibbert and Augustin isn’t bad either. I do think we should trade everyone except WES NIC LA
Batum Shakalaka
eveyrone else is on the trading block
actually, I would trade Nic and Wes if and only if it was a blockbuster trade for a superstar like Howard or something. LMA should never be traded IMO no matter what.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:20 PM PST up reply actions
I think I'd give up Batum/Matthews for Iguoudala, Rondo or Danny Granger
aside from those top tier wings, we should be looking for a center.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I used to be Batum's biggest advocate
but with the stacked draft this coming year, Wallace’s dominant play, our desperate need for a center & what seems to be Paul Allens “Win Now” mentality… We might be better off trading him this season while his value is high with a rookie scale contract. The ability to acquire a good reserve forward is a lot easier to acquire then a good starting center.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
true
ive watched our most valuable assets over the years become less and less valuable over time until they were hardly worth anything at all in trade value. Batum might be our biggest trade bait instead of GW, but its 1 or the other IMO.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:44 PM PST up reply actions
My stance has changed back and forth on who should be our
Small Forward going into the future. Though most recently I have sided with Wallace because he is more productive right now & gives us the best chance to win now. This up-tempo team with strong defensive guards is prime & ready for a point guard who can handle the duty. Felton isn’t the guy, if we can get Nash I say we do it & then use our cash on Hibbert next year. Resign Nash with the full MLE & get ready to make a run.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Batum and GW each are phenomenal talents
it is hard to decide between the 2 i agree. Nash and Hibbert would be great additions. Count me in on the Nash Hibbert Train – all aboard!
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:12 PM PST up reply actions
What About...
Looking at upgrading at the C in the draft? Couple guys named Andre Drummond, Jared Sullinger, Anthony Davis, John Henson, that guy from Syracuse “melo” looks pretty decent although i don’t know if he will be coming out. Meyers Leonard is a projected mid 1st round seven-footer, as well as Tyler Zeller and Robert Sacre. I’d really like to see front office look hard at this draft, they’re loads of talent.
Especially at the PF/C position. Which we are in dire need of.
"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "
I like the Okafor and Landry trade
precisely because it addresses those 2 issues, center and backup PF for LMA. IMO we should go after those 2 players in a trade. It seems like the most reasonable possibility on the trade front of actually happening. Alot of scerarios are just based around untradeable or coveted players the other team would want to keep and are therefore unlikely to happen. I like the idea of the draft, but it scares me because weve had atrocious luck in the draft over the years. LMA is the 1 bright shiny piece weve got from our drafting. The draft is a lottery, you might win but the chances are you will lose. Plus we tend to squander our young talent, leaving them on the bench not allowing them PT and thus causing them to lose trade value. Its happened time and time again.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
I understand where you are coming from
But i want a championship team. Not a second round team. IMO, laundry and Okafor for Wallace and Camby gets us to the second round. But certainly NOT anywhere near championship level. That is why i suggest younger players who can develope and be better than Okafor or Laundry in 2 years when LMA, Wes, Batum, Felton ..etc. are still in their prime. I still think we need more pieces than a younger center. For instance, Shooting. It’s terrible. Yeah it may come together, but we shouldnt be saying that for 4-5 games straight. IMO, going younger is never a bad decision. I’d rather trade wallace for Drummond, than wallace for Okafor
"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "
this, well said.
though Wallace won’t land ya Andre Drummond.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Allen does not want to start rebuilding again, but I think Cho was right and that´s the way we should go if we want to get a chance in this decade.
We missed our shot when both Roy and Oden went down.
I´m patient. I would trade for draft picks and young guys like Derrick Williams, who might cost us Wes or Batum. Minesota has already Kevin Love at the same position, is having a bad time finding playing time for him, and needs a good shooting guard.
2012 Draft is nice.
OJ Mayo is VERY nice, IMO, too. I would trade Wesley for OJ any day, but the best part is, it probably wouldn’t even cost that much (NJ was going to do Morrow for Mayo straight up and Indiana was McBob and a 1st for Mayo)
Batum Shakalaka
Im just not a fan of the draft unless we have a top ten pick or something
Weve had terrrible luck drafting players-LMA being the 1 good player weve drafted. Im mean we ACTUALLY drafted BABBIT for god sake, who in their right mind would draft LUKE FReAKIN BABBITT?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
Actually we traded Martell Webster
For Luke Babbitt and Ryan Gomes…
If you’re taking credit for us drafting Babbitt, then we also drafted Batum.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
we didnt draft batum
houston did i believe
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:36 PM PST up reply actions
Exactly my point.
We didn’t draft Babbitt and we didn’t draft Batum, we traded for both of them.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
word my bad
but do you agree that the draft isnt where we should upgrade or do you think we should use the draft to make an upgrade?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:41 PM PST up reply actions
I think we could draft Mike Moser next year
and replace Batum’s production of the bench. Allowing us to trade him this year for a C
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Agreed.
We are no longer in a position to hope that the injection of talent we get from the draft will be able to contribute at any high level before LaMarcus is rounding 30. Sure we can aim to add a couple role players through the draft, but for franchise changing talent, at this junction in time, our only option is a trade. I’ll post my idea once I work on it a bit more.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
i agree
the draft is cool but not a sure thing. Trading for a player with proven skills is as close as you can get to a sure thing.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:09 PM PST up reply actions
Felton was coming off a near all-star season
Now he is struggling. Nothing is a sure thing, i’d rather be young and unsure with potential than old and unsure.
"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "
Playing under D'Antoni and Karl inflates your stats.
You should take those last season numbers with a few heavy grains of salt…
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
I feel like that's not a valid argument..
cause if that was the case. Andre Miller’s stats would be inflated ( they aren’t) Ty Lawson’s, Birdman’s, Bill walker…. none of them have inflated stats. Carmelo and Amare do, because they are the best players. Felton is struggling compared to the last two seasons, no matter how you put it.
"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "
cant wait to hear your trade idea aswell : )
too bad the trade machine is down, it helps formulate some of these things
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:14 PM PST up reply actions
Trade checker on RealGM works.
WHO? Who you ask drafted Babbitt well I know you know it was KP and Buchanan. I don’t know if Buchanan is the guy to lead us forward.
I'm assuming Paul Allen is biding his team
on a GM who is currently under contract. I would like to see Geoff Petrie for pure nostalgia reasons.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
he's done a horrible job in sacramento though
just horrifying. Maybe it’s just a combination of inertia and the worst owners in the league, but it’s pretty worrying.
no doubt.
hence the nostalgia reason. If we just want a puppet with a face, we should just hire a former player.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
well, i guess if it's a puppet, it might as well be our puppet.
but I hope Allen is looking for something better than that
The draft is fine for role players
but yeah, we shouldn’t rely on it to find a franchise cornerstone anytime soon.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
LMA being the one good player we have drafted.
We got 5 good years from what was once considered the best 2 guard in the West behind Kobe.
by FPS NorthWest on Jan 17, 2012 12:57 PM PST up reply actions
Since people are being technical
We didn’t actually draft LMA. We drafted Thomas, Chicago drafted LMA, then we traded Thomas and one of the Russians to the Bulls for LMA on draft day.
Though for all intents and purposes I consider a player you get in a draft day trade as someone you drafted.
I love BROy
but I hope we never draft a player like him again. 5 years for nothing basically and it got us no closer to a championship and we have no trade value in him. Thanks for the memories BROY but I dont want the heartache. Especially if its supposed to be our #1 player, our franchise player, we should get more than 5 years outta him.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:05 PM PST up reply actions
i know the foye roy thing
drafts are crazy
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:09 PM PST up reply actions
Rockets did
we drafted Darrell Arthur & swapped, I think
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
...is that really different though?
When you trade for a draft pick on draft day its because you wanted to draft that player.
Batum for Ed Davis?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C21dvTGpvM
This guy’s on the Raptors, same height and PER as Okafor, same age as Batum, good shotblocker and rebounder but stuck behind Bargnani who’s finally having an all-star season. I think he would be an excellent pairing with Aldridge.
by hollywood robinson on Jan 17, 2012 11:50 AM PST reply actions
I'd do it
But don’t let his height deceive you. He lacks the standing reach and wingspan to play C.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Are Rudy Gay / Andre Igoudala available?
Batum Shakalaka
Weren't we just talkinga bout how over-paid those two guys are?
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 5:17 PM PST up reply actions
Rudy Gay is overpaid
Andre Igoudala is a tent pole, and he’s paid like one.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
No thanks to Rudy Gay.
However I’d welcome Iggy with open arms, the guy is one of my favorite NBA players. The thought of him & Gerald Wallace playing on the wings has been one of my dreams for several years. He is also shooting the best 3% of his career so far this year. Here is my scenario
Sixers get:
Nicolas Batum
Wesley Matthews
Chris Johnson
Armon Johnson
Luke Babbitt
First round pick?
Portland gets:
Andre Iguodala
http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/5992869
I’d do that every day of the week & twice on sundays!
The next move consists of finding a point guard. Kirk Hinrich joining the likes of Iggy & Crash would make us the most dominant perimeter defensive team in the NBA, bar none.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
I know this isn't trade discussion
But the haters of Bismack Biyombo are going to be eating crow, at least for one game… In 14 minutes so far for the Bobacts he has recorded 10 points on 5-5 shooting, 7 rebounds, 3 blocks against Dwight Howard & the Orlando Magic. I’m rooting for ya, big fella.
Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM
Finished off 11 pts, 10 rbnds, 4 blks
Off of a whole 21 minutes. This is coming off a DNP-CD against the Cavs. No idea what they were thinking there. I’ve been following the Bobcats recently, him and Mullens complement each other pretty well.
by Batumshakalaka on Jan 18, 2012 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
Apparently teams are now calling the Celtics, as to whether they will trade Paul Pierce
and blow it up… http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/218370/Teams_Begin_Calling_Celtics_On_Pierce
The Truth in a Blazers uniform? I like that…
http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/5993142 …..
What say you?
He is to old
and ANOTHER wing? I mean I wouldn’t be mad if it happened, but I’m not pulling for it. I would rather get Ray Allen from them then Paul, if we are trying to grab one of their wings.
Javale McGee
Flip Saunders hates his guts but the dude is extremely talented & has production to back it up. NBA leader in blocks….
especially if kurt thomas and camby can give the kid a bit of guidance
I say yes. what do you think it’d take to get him?
Taking a look at their roster
They drafted Chris Singleton but he hasn’t really impressed this year besides his defense. He reminds me of a young Bruce Bowen. They also drafted Jan Vesely at #6 overall & has looked promising, though in a very small amount of minutes.
I think Batum & his proven record as a defender/floor spreading shooter could attract them, not to mention he still has loads of upside. Especially because they have one of his french pals in Kevin Seraphin on the team. We would likely take Singleton back in return & would be fine for us as a reserve SF. With us acquiring McGee, I assume they will demand Oden(Who is on the opposite end of the character spectrum). I’d be willing to send Nolan Smith also, who is good pals with John Wall. Probably need to send them a draft pick or two as well.
I’d send whatever we have to besides Aldridge & Wallace. Good point on Thomas/Camby, I do think he could learn a lot from em’.
I'd consider taking Rashard Lewis back
as long as we could resign McGee, though I’m not sure of the bird rights etc.
Blatche is dirty water trash.
When does Lewis's monster contract expire?
Anyway, I think they’ll probably amnesty him at the end of the season instead of trading him out.
NBA leader in dumb plays too
but hopefully Nate could beat that outa him.
Young man needs guidance.
He definitely is overloaded with “swag”. But you know what, so was Sheed & he turned the corner with Larry Brown, then proceeded to win a championship.
I'm all for grabbing him
but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t made him self look like an idiot so far this year. Hopefully that just means we can get him for cheap.
Someone mentioned OJ Mayo earlier
wasnt he involved in a gun incident with another player while on a plane? Someone please correct me if Im wrong. I think the other player was Rudy Gay but I could be totally wrong.
your thinking of Javarris Crittendon & Gilbert Arenas
here is the story you are referring to: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5996213
both involved gambling debts
Thanks. I appreciate it
I dont know how I linked those names to it.
OK. A coment about the draft-
We would most likely get One of the Zeller brothers or one of the Plummlee brothers. THey will be good players but will be very rusty at first. THey hav an awful lot to work on before they can provide good production in the NBA. I think it could be better to trade for a good center or pick up one in free agency. I dont want to give up GW or Batum but Im afraid we will soon have to part with one or the other. Deron Williams would be nice. I would have to say no to Nash. I think if Elliott Williams gets more playing time he could do well. Same with Nolan Smith.
Most likely i see the Blazers getting a SF/PF
Wallace will most likely leave and there are minutes to be had behind Batum and Aldridge next year.
Only other scenario I can foresee is the Blazers moving up in the draft to get Tony Wroten.
There are virtually no starting caliber Centers in the draft besides Andre Drummond.
There are virtually no starting caliber Point Guards except Tony Wroten potentially.
This draft is stacked with SF and PF. Blazers will be better off choosing one of them – unless they move up.
by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:23 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm not impressed by Tony Wroten
I think he’ll go too high in this draft (simply because there’s a dearth of PG’s) to a team with poor management, and end up pretty mediocre. There are a lot of guys that will be drafted after him that will likely well out perform him.
I’d really like to trade Batum now for a pick that could land us Michael Kidd-Gilchrist. Barring that, I’d go with Tyler Zeller, Moutaou Yarou, Mike Moser, or roll the dice on Festus Ezeli. Robert Sacre is an option in the second round, but I really hate that guy (Pilots till I die!).
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
I love Wroten. Also like T-Ross.
Perry Jones has potential, but would be way too expensive.
Batum Shakalaka
Yippee! Trade Machine is back online!
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8ysjztd
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
And another...
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=78hpmzj
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
by Adam Randall on Jan 18, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
All Nash trades, by the way...
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
by Adam Randall on Jan 18, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
Too fun...
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7zpaetd
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
by Adam Randall on Jan 18, 2012 10:27 AM PST up reply actions
Just the guards this time, and the best deal for Portland...
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7lsr9ow
Felton, Nolan and AJ for Nash.
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
by Adam Randall on Jan 18, 2012 10:29 AM PST up reply actions
I'd much sooner give up Matthews.
I can’t get behind any trade involving Batum. Not even for Nash.
Doers & Makers > Movers & Shakers
by Adam Randall on Jan 18, 2012 4:32 PM PST up reply actions
How we get it done.
Philly gets
Batum
Matthews
C.Johnson
Blazers 1st Round Pick
Blazers get
Iguodala
Hawks get
Raymond Felton
Blazers 2nd round pick
Blazers get
Kirk Hinrich
Then, sign Kenyon Martin to a contract once his Chinese Basketball League contracts expire for contracts the rest of the season. Resign Camby & Martin for vet minimum next year, resign Hinrich for the MLE, sign Roy Hibbert to a 12 Mil a year deal & proceed to win a championship in 2013 :)
cuts our depth down without batum,
but if we can pick up a good role player to play backup 3 or point, I’d call it good.
iggy plays the 2 and 3
and we still have G3. If Elliot is going to be as good as I hope, we could have him back up iggy and jamal at the 2.
I am not convinced that
Iguodala is worth giving up both Matthews and Batum. Maybe one of them but not both of them.
As long as the sixers are playing like a top 3 team
Iggy isn’t going anywhere. Obviously Hawes and Lou Williams aren’t going to keep up their play for the rest of the season, but that team is playing so well that even when they drop off some, it should still be a force.
by Royster on Jan 18, 2012 12:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
No way 76ers Trade anyone
Not when they are playing the way they are.
With milwaukee not doing so hot
Would there be a possibility of snagging Bogut out of there?
Doubt it.
Bogut is one of the foundational pieces the team is built on. Especially since he likes it in milwaukee.
John Hammond is as unpredictable as they come
Sometimes he looks brilliant, other times he looks like a moron. I wouldn’t rule out a youth movement.
However, if Bogut gets moved, I think Milwaukee will wait till next season, when S-Jax, Udrih, Livingston, and Dunleavy will be EC’s. They can then amnesty Drew Gooden, trade Bogut for less salary and/or EC’s (plus other assets), and become players in FA and the draft.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Okay, I'm not satisfied with it, but I want Bogut and I believe this is semi-plausible
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6ljs74v
Trade: Luke Babbitt, 2012 2nd round pick from Denver and 1.5 million cash for Quentin Richardson and a 2012 1st round pick
Trade: Marcus Camby, Wesley Matthews, More favorable 2012 1st round pick from Portland or Orlando, 2013 2nd round pick and 1.5 million cash for Andrew Bogut and Stephen Jackson
Roster:
PG: Raymond Felton – Nolan Smith – Armon Johnson
SG: Stephen Jackson – Jamal Crawford – Elliot Williams
SF: Gerald Wallace – Nicolas Batum – Quentin Richardson
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge – Craig Smith
C: Andrew Bogut – Kurt Thomas – Chris Johnson – Greg Oden
Taking on the aging and declining headcase Stephen Jackson is the price to pay for getting Bogut. Matthews would have to be included in any deal with Milwaukee considering he’s a hometown product and went to college at Marquette, plus he fills a long term positional need and would make a great, young promising back court duo with Brandon Jennings. A 1st round pick would have to be included going to Milwaukee in this deal even with the salary relief, dumping of bad contract and local hometown awesome Wes Money already going their way, because that’s how valuable Bogut is. Considering we’re picked out until at least 2015, I figured the easiest way to get a pick is to look at a contender with a bad contract, and trade one of our young guys for it, hence the inclusion of Quentin Richardson for Luke Babbitt, if they don’t want Babbitt, I wouldn’t be opposed to giving them Elliot Williams or Nolan Smith, but it’s not preferable.
I know we’re basically the Charlotte Bobcats with a frontcourt that’s on steroids. But LaMarcus is better than anybody that was on that Bobcats squad, and Bogut is a top 3 center in this league. Long term we would seriously need to look for a replacement for our starting SG, because Stephen Jackson is more of a stop gap than an answer, but in terms of building for a contender, getting that dominant defensive C is key imo, and there isn’t a better option out there than Andrew Bogut.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
No way Bucks trade their all-star center
unless they get a capable center in return. This makes me laugh.
It's called blowing it up for Milwaukee
Something they should have done last year. Bogut will win them some games now, but will hinder their long term opportunities of gathering a franchise changing talent through the draft, which is what they should do. The Bucks have been spinning their wheels for a couple years now not going anywhere, this trade gives them the opportunity to kickstart the rebuilding package while still keeping fan interest alive by bringing in the local boy Matthews. And fine, honestly, I’ll throw in Greg Oden as a filler in that deal any day.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
He isn't enough, and from a draft standpoint with Bogut...
They will always be a middle of the road team, winning just enough games to never get a future franchise changing talent but not enough to ever really go anywhere. They are stuck in NBA purgatory, and outside of getting a miraculous steal in the draft, the easiest way to get out of NBA purgatory is to blow it up and tank to get future top talent, especially when you’re a team as small of a market as Milwaukee. Bogut cannot carry a team on his own, but he’s a great complimentary piece on a championship or near-championship caliber team, but Milwaukee ain’t that and never will be considering their undesirability as a free agent location, and their relative mediocrity making sure the likelihood that they get the star perimeiter player they need is basically nil.
Of course, I know my whole trade scenario is a pipe dream merely because Herb Kohl is old and doesn’t want to go through another rebuilding process and never see his team be relatively competitive again before he croaks, but from a logical point of view, Milwaukee needs to shed contracts and go young while tanking for future top draft picks, that’s the only way out of their current predicament.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
Also, Bogut isn't an All-Star
And probably never will be, the combination of his offensive limitations and the fact that he plays for an NBA team in a city that most people don’t even know has an NBA team will basically ensure that he is never an All-Star at least while he’s in Milwaukee.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
He's legitimately the #3 true center in the NBA.
He’s definitely All-Star caliber, and just about every team in the NBA knows it.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
The C position is incredibly weak in the NBA, and Bogut has severe offensive limitations.
He’s basically a slightly better/younger Tyson Chandler, important to a championship caliber team or a team one legit C away from being a championship caliber team, but on a team like Milwaukee, with absolutely no true dependable offensive weapons outside of their high usage, inefficient guards, Bogut is misused and it’s a shame to waste his prime years on a team that’s going nowhere, especially considering how much Bogut makes them win just enough to never garner a top draft pick, but isn’t good enough to carry the team in the playoffs if they even reach it. He’s a huge anchor considering the situation in Milwaukee, but fits perfectly on a team like Portland. Honestly, I would trade any combination of players not named LaMarcus Aldrige and Nicolas Batum for Bogut and whatever bloated contracts they wanted to send back, I’m just a homer and wanted to pick him up on the cheap.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
I agree with almost everything you said
But Bogut is much better than Tyson Chandler. He’s much better offensively than Chandler, and just as good, if not better, defensively when healthy.
People forget how injury plagued and mediocre Tyson Chandler’s career has been. 10 years in the league, and he’s had one good season with NOLA and Dallas, each, and is looking good so far with NYK. If we are going off of those seasons for Chandler, it’s only fair to compare them to Bogut’s 16-10-2-2.5 season.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
I am well aware that Bogut is much better than Chandler
But my point is his importance and fit in the context of a team, not necessarily exact offensive and defensive skills.
I do believe that Bogut is the second best defensive C, and is slightly more offensively gifted than Chandler, but on a team with real offensive weapons, Bogut would only be called on to put up a line of 12/12/2 blocks a game.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
Ah, I see you point now. I was mislead by this sentence:
He’s basically a slightly better/younger Tyson Chandler
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Understood, it was poorly worded for what I was trying to convey.
The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/
Blazers number one weakness is no capable low post player who can take the pressure off of Aldridge.
Blazers should really see if they can pull off a trade similar to the Gerald Wallace trade. Blazers could offer Camby’s contract Luke Babbitt, Armon Johnson, and a 2nd round pick for Okafor, and then sign Patty Mills when he is available to play with the NBA
Better
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7qcn7gp
Nash
Crawford
Batum
Studamire
Aldrige
Bench
Nolan
Lopez
Thomas
Jhonson
A.Jhonson
his contract was uninsurable,
his knees are constantly getting injured. even if I liked the guy, no way.
Something like this
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7pcz598
with a host of picks from PDX and ATL going to MIL. Works well for every team. Blazers can move LMA to C, and get a low-post scorer/paint defender who fits the system. The focus in FA 2012 would be adding a C like Sam Dalembert, which would eventually move Aldridge back to the PF, and allow Josh Smith to act as a Nic Batum replacement and LMA/Crash insurance policy.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
Why would you want Josh Smith
over Bogut? Blazers lose in this trade imo.
Of course I'd rather have Bogut
But if the Blazers could nab Josh Smith in any way possible without giving up Gerald Wallace or LaMarcus Aldridge, it has to be considered a win for the Blazers.
Really, Milwaukee is the closest thing to a loser in this trade.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
meh
I don’t want to get into an argument, so I’ll just agree to disagree.
Healthy discussion is what blogs are all about
Don’t think I’m going to let you off easily!!!!! lol
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
How about this
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8xoeo68
Rondo
Crawford
Batum
Aldridge
Camby
Bench:
Smith, Willams, O’neal, Stiemsma, Thomas, Jhonson, Babbit
It works for the Celtics, and Kings right
Oh my goodness, I love any trade that brings us Rondo!
Though I’m sure Celtics would also demand Batum, and I would oblige without any issue. With Matthews/Batum they could smoothly transition past the Allen/Pierce era. I’d take a serious look at Ray Allen in free agency next year too.
Though I seriously doubt Kings would want Gerald Wallace, they are looking to go young & rebuild. Nor do I think the Celtics would be looking for DeMarcus Cousins in lieu of losing Rondo, would likely want a PG(Perhaps a high draft pick, landing them Doc Rivers son, Austin Rivers) in addition to Matthews/Batum. There is likely a more ideal 3rd party for a deal like this, then the Kings. To cap it off, Felton’s big drop in production really is the final nail in this deals coffin. However I will hold off hope, that one day Rondo will be a Blazer. Much how I felt about Gerald Wallace.
hopefully it comes sooner,
and we can get a few more years with him. but I don’t think rondo will want to stay through a rebuilding process, especially since it’ll take boston some time to recover and they’ve mad a few questionable moves lately.
Works
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=82hs3ga
Rondo
Matthews
Wallace
Aldridge
Haywood
Bench: Crawford, Marion, Thomas, Smiths, Babbit, Jhonsons
Why it works:
Mavs: They are trying to clear room for the 2012 F/A class, so we will get 60.5 million dollars they still own Marion, and Haywood, getting camby who is becoming a F/A this up coming summer will clear 11.2 Million.
Celtics: They will get Batum a kid filled with potential, few draft picks, cash, Felton, and trash in both the Jhonsons I would give them Matthews if they asked for him. it would look like this http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6oqr66l lets face it if the Celtics stay bellow 500 Ray Allen will not resign with them.
It works for Portland chances of this happening 1/1000000 but hey its just an idea
Celtics still don't land enough talent
If Raymond Felton was killing it for us, it might have worked if Matthews was included. But not now he is stinking it up here in Rip City.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Don't give the team away
Some of these trades have Portland giving up half of the team, and getting one mediocre-to-good player. Uh, no thanks, guys…..Iggy is a fine player, but I wouldn’t sell the entire farm, minus LMA, to get him. He does not impress me That much…..As for the draft vs. F.A. thing, Portland’s ability to draft is seriously in question. Their recent history is not good. One more injury-prone star, and I’ll become a non-Blazers-fan, I swear. Loved Roy. Love Oden. Shouldn’t have drafted either one, IMO….Given that poor recent history, F.A. seems the better avenue. These trades you guys have come up with are not good for Portland At All, in most cases, I think. Don’t sell the farm, unless you get fair return for said farm.
I'm done arguing, but will simply say.
Matthews, Batum < Iguodala.
Period. Would trade both for him, as would our GM(Whoever that really is).
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
Back-up PG and PF Idea
Minnesota has tons of both…we give up Matthews, make Crawford the starting 2 and let Williams/Smith get a little back-up time.
Drastically improve our 2nd unit with Ridnour at PG and Tolliver at PF.
I hate the fact that chuck hayes is stuck on a losing team in sacramento,
while we decided to spend our money on chuckford instead. what would it take to pry him away from sacramento? maybe we could grab one of their 200 combo guards as well.
he is going to miss 3-4 weeks with a dislocated shoulder
with his contract & ultimate value(when you consider a starting center like Okefor/Gortat could be obtained), I’d give them no more then CJ/Babbit/Armon + a 2nd round pick. I’m sure another team can provide more value too. He just isn’t worth losing Wesley or Nic for. They more guards then they know what to do with.
Yeah. Definitely should have spent our $$$ on Hayes.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
This is the most ridiculous thing you will ever read, but hear me out.
We all know the draft lottery is rigged. Thus, giving our recent injury history, I think that if we were to somehow get a lottery pick from anywhere, I think it is possible that David Stern shows us some sympathy.
It’s crazy and I’m probably hallucinating right now, but think about it.
Batum Shakalaka
Only thing I disagree with
is Stern giving us sympathy. There have been WAYYYYYY to many “coincidences” to think otherwise.
Just about everybody on this team
is trade material.
The problem is are we going to trade to get better or worse?
Bunch of trades
The not so likely one: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=745enal
The not so likely one # 2: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6lukem3
The one that is more likely: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6mx7rmw
The one that is possible #2: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7wgjyer
The one that could happen: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=74tw5ng
I wish it happened: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7mv2tur
The "I wish it happened" trade is amazing.
Lets do it. Right now.
Batum Shakalaka
A guy like Kaman could probably be had really easily and help out a lot
It’s difficult picturing a deal that makes a lot of since there, though.
volatilelyle.com
New Orleans will deal Okefor
because they are looking to shed total salary for a franchise sale of the Hornets from the NBA.
"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil
I think we should go after Nash
Suns/Blazers trade:
Blazers get: Steve Nash, Jared Dudley, Robin Lopez
Suns get: Raymond Felton, Wesley Matthews, Marcus Camby
Why Portland does it:
Comes out with a smart, three-point shooting veteran PG and a mentor for Nolan Smith, a solid long-distance sharp-shooter in Jared Dudley, and an energetic, solid center in need of more minutes.
Why Phoenix does it:
Comes out with a younger PG who can push the ball, a young, energetic, scrappy player in Wesley Matthews, and a decent veteran center with an expiring contract.
I don't think the EC helps PHX
they want young talent and draft picks. Young talent is cheap so I don’t think they care much about EC, also WEs$ isn’t exactly a guy you build around.
A serious trade
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6vl8xnr
This trade helps all parties. The bulls are in a win now mode a will need a guy like camby for a playoff run. Babbitt replaces the long term 3 ball. Sac. Gets some sf vet help missing from the team. We get a PF/c and out side shooter at the 3.
Felton. Smith
Matthews Crawford Williams
Batum, Korver
Aldridge, Thomas, smith, cj
Hibbert, Thomas, oden, cj
Much more size and shooting. We can also try and turn Crawford around to a playoff contender for pick.

by 

































