Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

How About A Trade Drawer? 1-16-12

I decided to make this trade drawer because almost every post conversation I read lately is turning into trade talk. Thats great and fun and nice and stuff. Lets keep it going. Now we got a spot to do it in.

Okay, we all could agree on this statement, we need a legit center. Dave hinted at an interesting possibility today at the end of his recap saying that it was possible Okafor could be an asset NOR would want to get rid of. Well, that really intrigues me personally, because he is the type of center we would need. Now, me personally, I dont know all the ins and outs of contracts, and all the mumbo jumbo that goes down with a trade. But realistically, what is a trade that would be in the realm of possibility where we might land Okafor, realistically whats his value? Some folks have said GW for Okafor straight up. Dont know if that works or not.

Okay another one Ive been hearing is we need a PG. 2 names worthy of mentioning Ive heard bounce around the campfire are Deron Williams and Steve Nash. Lets start with Steve. Everyone knows hes good. Right now hes avg 10.1 ast per game, which is #1 in the NBA tied with Rondo. In contrast he has the 10th highest ast/to ration in the NBA. But hes also avg 13pts and had a 21per! Dudes good. To trade for him PHX is gonna want assets, probably more than hes worth IMO. Because of age, we prolly dont want him.But for fun, Who is worth giving up to get Nash?

Now Deron, hes good, we know this man. 18.3pts 8.4ast 3.3rebs 17.64per 1.91ast/to ratio. He has the 4th most ast in the league right now with 101. His value is high! Again like Nash, wed have to give up alot to land Deron. Who would make it worth it? Who would you be willing to give up?

Out of these scenarios, the one where we land a decent center is the one I want to see happen. SO heres my trade that probably doesnt work but I just quickly eyeballed the salaries since the trade machine is down.

We Get:

C Omeka Okafor 12.6million

PF Carl Landry 8.5million

They Get:

SF Gerald Wallace 9.5million

C Marcus Camby 11.2million

and any combination of Eliot, Babbit, Freeland, Smith, Armon, Rhino, CJ, picks, cash

Comment 257 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

not sexy

BUT It is not that blockbuster deal people look for but Okafor trade listed makes the Blazers better so I could sign off on that.

by seth#55 on Jan 16, 2012 9:13 PM PST reply actions  

I have been kicking around this idea as well

It would weaken our strongest position in the SF. But we would have probably the best PF depth in the league, which right now we don’t even have PF depth. Nice thing about GW is he can play both the 3 and 4, Landry is really just a 4. However…..that trade brings us a good C in Okafor, which really sells the idea.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 9:31 PM PST reply actions  

I feel pretty much the same

We need a center plus we could really use a good backup for our main threat LMA so he has some juice left for the playoffs. That seems more important than a pg right now. Also, No matter what GW is a tough player to give up. But he is our most valuable trade asset and we have Batum ready to start.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 9:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Ya

at this point we I want to put Batums contract extension off so he keeps playing like the last 2 games. If he doest that every game we really don’t NEED G3.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 9:56 PM PST up reply actions  

It would be cool

though unlikely. If we could trade G3, have him opt out next season and resign him. I’m sure that wouldn’t be his perfect situation, but it is mine.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 9:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I absolutely want to focus all our power

in acquiring Roy Hibbert in next years free agency, or through a trade. He is the ideal center to pair next to Aldridge for the rest of their careers.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/218322/Hibbert_May_Prefer_Gamble_On_Restricted_Free_Agency

It may be tough to pull it off in a trade form though, because they are log jammed at both forward spots with Danny Granger, David West, Tyler Hansborough, Jeff Foster & Louis Admundson. If they did lose Hibbert, Indiana is an attractive location as any for an Greg Oden revival, with him being the home town kid.

I absolutely would not give up Gerald Wallace to acquire Emeka Okefor. I think Camby + a first round pick would probably get it done, imo. Not sure I’d give them Batum either, though with Monty & the Hornets would be an ideal landing spot for Nic to get his chance to really flourish as a player.

The idea of a Felton/Crawford for Steve Nash swap is quite intriguing. I’d press Danny Ainge for Rondo if at all possible. The thought of lobs to Aldridge & Wallace makes me a happy man. Sticking with high quality perimeter player, Andre Iguodala is an obvious target, him & Kirk Hinrich fit the defensive mindset type of players that this team needs more of(See Wallace, Gerald).

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:01 PM PST reply actions  

I like hibbert but

Hes not as good defensively yet like emeka or even freeland. Personally I say keep freeland but trade anyone else you listed above. Keep felton. And keep gw. He is much more agressive than nic and those two competing for minutes is helping nics game. But gw dives for the ball more something nic hardly ever does.

Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy

by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 10:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

And dont trade felton

He just needs to find his groove.

Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy

by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 10:07 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

One thing that kinda bums me out is Ray ceiling isnt much higher that it already is!

Raymond is playing just below his career averages. Right now this season he averages 11.1pts 6.8ast 2.8rebs 2.6tos and his career #’s are 13.6pts 6.7 ast and 3.4rebs 2.6tos.

Seems to me there isnt much more that Ray is gonna give us.

Unless he has a complete turn around to his game, hes barely shy of what hes averaged over his career. Not holding out for a better PG and trading away Dre was not a good move, atleast it appears that way so far. Even so, I say we need a starting center position more than we need to upgrade Ray at this time.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Well said.

I wish we had Dre back :\ The “Felton is a better fit because he can shoot from 3” argument is invalid after bricking most his attempts this year.

The thought of Steve Nash running the all the sudden up-tempo Portland Trail Blazers with Gerald Wallace, Wesley Matthews & Aldridge catching alley oops excites me. If we could also acquire a center to defend the paint I like our chances at a 1-2 year championship window.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I wish there was a way to pry Rubio

away from the TWolves. Maybe we can just give them like 4 1st round picks so Kahn can get a a few new PGs that suck.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

That ship sailed a while ago.

We shouldn’t be looking to trade for any spaniards. I doubt any of them would want to play here after how things went with Sergio & Rudy.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Its not going to happen though

Rubio is their franchise PG.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I know

I’m going to think Kahn is that stupid…and be wrong. But it makes me feel like there is a chance.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 10:57 PM PST up reply actions  

His number are not an issue

his shooting percentage is and that will sort itself out.
He has traditionally been a low forties shooter from inside the arch and a low thirties shooter from outside. This year
.347 fg% .140 3pt%
that will not last. once we is in shape and comfortable with his role he will be fine. I actually expect him to be quite good.

by skott75 on Jan 17, 2012 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh....
Hes not as good defensively yet like emeka or even freeland.

I’d say he is not quite as good as Okefor man to man in the post but as a weak side defender I’d give Hibbert the edge.

I watched a lot of EuroLeague ball this year, Freeland isn’t close to Hibbert as an NBA defender. Doesn’t have the size or length to bang with the best NBA 5’s like Hibbert does.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:10 PM PST up reply actions  

We need someone

who can not get completely destroyed by Andrew Bynum or Dwight Howard(Who now apparently wants to be a LA Clipper, they can put together a much better deal then the Lakers…) in a seven game series.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:33 PM PST up reply actions  

thats hard though

stat wise Bynum is #2 center under Dwight
Almost all possible centers get burned by Bynum. I think id settle for Okafor. Hibbert is intriguing though. So is Gortat, especially Varejao. I wonder who will be available at the deadline?

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd say

Okefor or Kaman
Gortat
Varejao
Dalembert
Jason Thompson
Chuck Hayes

could all be on the table if their teams don’t have a chance at the playoffs.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

cavs aren't giving up varejao.

they’re basically on track to be the 8th seed, and their defense will suffer badly without him. bogut might even be more likely at this point.

I like those options, though. or hibbert in free agency, though i’m pretty sure indiana will match anything that isn’t ridiculous, and we don’t want to pay too much more than he’s worth.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

No one deserves the Blazers free agent $$$

more then a 7’2, extremely productive & reliable center.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

bring it on baby!

sounds like a good plan to me, sounds like a good way to spend our money!

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm down for Hibbert as well.

He is restricted so they may have to really up the ante but I’d think it was worth it. 7’2" and a PER over twenty, he is one of a kind. He can suck up rebounds and score inside taking a lot of pressure off of Aldridge. He should be the number one focus this summer. Deron Williams would be the number two candidate. They’ll have to find someone how can run an offense or can ball handle at the very least. Felton may be Okay to keep but should not be the main guy running the show. If they landed Hibbert they could low ball Felton and bring Miller back to start. Just remind McMillan he has one year left on his contract (next summer) so it would behoove him to let Miller run the offense as he is a lot smarter than him.

by XBlazerfan on Jan 17, 2012 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

HIbbert and Collison would be awesome

Get your big and a up and coming PG. Hibbert is solid if unspectacular and Collison is gonna be another solid UCLA gurad.

by breakerfall on Jan 17, 2012 12:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Blazers could offer Hibbert a lot of money

Unfortunately the Pacers can offer him the same amount of money, as well as a longer deal.
Pacers are in a better position than the Blazers are to sign Hibbert to a long contract

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Varejao anyone?

4th in rebs per game
2nd in off rebs per game
6th rebs per 48min 17.3
similar #’s to Okafor 9.5pts 11.2rebs 18.69per
7.7 million contract

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 10:23 PM PST reply actions  

A solid idea.

Another is Marcin Gortat http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2758/marcin-gortat

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:27 PM PST up reply actions  

he is 27 years old

rebuilding will take at least 2-3 years, especially because they have to get rid of the old guys first. I don’t think that’ll work

markeiff morris (I don’t know if I spelled that right) is doing really well for them, so they’ll rebuild around him.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 8:48 AM PST up reply actions  

NO gets:
GW
MInn gets:
Second round pick from Blazers
Por get:
Emeka Okafor
Luke Ridnour

by AP_18 on Jan 16, 2012 10:35 PM PST reply actions  

Or Camby plus small filler(Armon) for okafor straight up

by AP_18 on Jan 16, 2012 10:36 PM PST up reply actions  

If we can get Wallace for what we got him for

I don’t see why we can’t get Okefor on the cheap at the deadline, might have to send a draft pick to them though. I’d consider letting Batum go if they send us a pick that could land either local prospect Terrence Jones or Mike Moser.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd be concerned about our perimeter defense

in which case I’d much rather have Kirk Hinrich. I think the Hawks are more likely to let him go for a 2nd rounder then the Wolves would for Ridnour. Better fit for us too.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Kirk would be cool

I don’t know that I would be excited about it, but it wouldn’t be a bad move.

by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the thought of his steady play & good defense

over the erratic Felton or the one dimensional Ridnour.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I would definitely take Kirk, especially as our back up PG.

by AP_18 on Jan 16, 2012 10:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I still love Samuel Dalembert too.

http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/991/samuel-dalembert , another trade deadline prospect who could be had after Houston sinks the ship.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:39 PM PST reply actions  

A proven NBA commodity, a great person & reasonable contract.

hes right up there with Okefor/Gortat, in terms of a backup plan if the Hibbert idea doesn’t pull through.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 10:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd expect Houston to rebound

They’ve played a tough sched, and haven’t gotten as much out of everyone not named Kyle Lowry as they could. They’ll compete for the last playoff spot, and probably won’t trade Dalembert unless it’s for a prime C (e.g. Okafor).

However, Camby has said before that he would only accept a trade to Houston. If we are intent on trading him, Dalembert for Camby straight up would be ideal, but I’m not sure why Houston would do that unless Jordan Hill really breaks out and Dalembert demands a trade.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we need to seriously consider upgrading the roster

through the 2012 draft too. Lots of talent. That Wallace for 4 first rounders sounds real nice(not for this year, but having a chance relive the young/exciting team promise like we had with the former Roy/Oden/Aldridge core, except this time we get it right)

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 16, 2012 11:18 PM PST reply actions  

glad we gotta trade drawer going

the deadline is still 2 months away Mar 15 I believe but hey im sure the phones are always ringing all year long. teams are always talkin. i sure it gets going closer to the deadline but right now i assume fo’s are making preliminary calls, to see who is and who isnt available.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 11:19 PM PST reply actions  

the 3 players i dont wanna give up are

nic, wes, LMA-

everyone else should be on the table,

ugh i just wish we knew if oden was gonna make a serious comeback or not. it changes so much if he is, we wait and dont trade for okafor or a center, just ride it out. if oden isnt coming back we need to do everything possible to get the best available center. if oden is coming back we could throw our loot at a badass pg or backup to LMA instead of a center.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 11:33 PM PST reply actions  

"ugh i just wish we knew if oden was gonna make a serious comeback or not."

I think that question has already been answered. I’ve said before, it wouldn’t be prudent of management to rely on him for anything. Rather set him free to try to revive his career elsewhere & focus on acquiring a proven center.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

i wonder what Oden trade value is right now?

High or Low? I still think he has a ton of potential to be great but only time will tell on that one. I wonder what other teams think? Sure would be cool to be a fly on the wall during those phone calls.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:46 PM PST up reply actions  

It depends on the team.

A team with no center depth at all seems like the ideal spot for an Oden comeback story. Because the pressure will be off Oden. His value could skyrocket if he puts together a couple of good games before the deadline. I’d personally like to see him sign with Indiana after we steal Hibbert from em’ :)

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

My thought is

I hope to see him play again b4 he gets traded away.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting Ideas

I definitely belong to the camp that says LMA, Matthews, and Batum are our only “untouchables.” These are all young guys that you can still build around. While LMA may not be one of the top tier players in the league, he is certainly All-Star worthy. Nic and Wes may never be All-Star caliber, but they’re young, relatively cheap, and they fill those roster spots nicely. What I think they need to add is another All-Star caliber player, another complimentary player, and to shore up the bench.

What’s important to keep in mind with all of this is in this new era of supposed league-wide fiscal responsibility, the decision to keep or add player depends not simply on their talent or contribution potential, but rather their talent/contibution per dollar spent. That is to say, is it really worth spending $10 million per season on a a player like Wallace when you might be able to spend $6 million per season on a guy like Batum?

Hibbert has been mentioned a lot so far in this thread and rightfully so. He’s a huge presence in the middle (7-2, 260), he’ll tally 10+ points shooting > 50%, grab a bunch of rebounds and block a 1-2 shots night in and night out. His PER is over 20 which is higher than most, if not all the other centers we’re talking about here. He’s young too. At only 25, he probably hasn’t reached his prime yet. Hibbert is a legit All-Star caliber center going forward.

There’s a couple ways the Blazers could go about getting him. First, and probably the most risky, is attempting to sign him in free agency. Portland would have to cut loose of a combination of Wallace, Oden, Felton, and Camby to free up space as Hibbert will likely garner a $10 + million dollar contract. Then they’d have to re-sign Batum. The other way would be to use the above commodities to negotiate a sign and trade with the Pacers. They may want Oden as some means of compensation in losing Hibbert, and Camby’s expiring contract is always nice. The good thing about a sign-and-trade in this scenario is that you may not necessarily have to give up Felton or Wallace. If Hibbert was set on leaving Indiana, the Pacers may just jump at the chance to snag a big expiring contract, a +/- investment in Oden, and a promising prospect like Elliot Williams rather than loose Hibbert to free agency. In the end, if a sign and trade doesn’t work out, at least you haven’t lost anything. You still have your resources to pursue something else. IF the Blazers were able to pull off such a sign and trade, the roster would end up looking like this:

PG – Felton (expiring contract)
SG – Matthews (Tier 2 money)
SF – Wallace (expiring contract)
PF – Aldridge (Tier 1 money)
C – Hibbert (Tier 1 money)

This lineup begs the question of what to do with Wallace and Felton. If Wallace was wanting big money, the Blazers would not be able to sign him. In this instance, it would behoove the team to try to package both Wallace and Felton for a more solid point guard, and maybe a quality backup. The Blazers would be motivated to do this, if say, Felton continued his lackluster performance.

There are some interesting point guard situations brewing out there. Of course there’s the big free agent being Williams, but how realistic is it that Williams would want to come to Portland? Not very. Nash is another big free agent but he’s quite old. You MIGHT get production out of him for a year or two. Not exactly the ideal candidate to fill the role as “point guard of the future.” A free agent point guard who I think will be overlooked because of the big two is D.J. Augustin. Here’s a guy who is young (24), scores 15, dishes out 7 dimes, and who takes pretty good care of the ball (A/T > 3.5). He also shoots 38% (career) from the beyond the arc. The best part? You’d get him at fraction of the cost of a Williams or Nash.

Other considerations out there would be Mike Conley Jr., Jose Calderon, and Tony Parker. All are players Portland may be able to trade for with assets like Wallace and/or Felton, but all will require big money down the road. All of them, save for Conley, are well into their prime years as well.

It makes it hard to figure the exact logistics and finances of these player movements without ESPN’s trade machine up and running, but just for arguments sake, the above moves would place themselves in a position to have a lineup featuring:

PG – Augustin (Tier 2 money)
SG – Matthews (Tier 2 money)
SF – Batum (Tier 2 money)
PF – Aldridge (Tier 1 money)
C – Hibbert (Tier 1 money)

This lineup is young, better than the current one, and likely less expensive. The team would, in all probability, be left under the cap penalties and be able to offer a full mid-level to help shore up the bench.

In short, if the team continues to mire in mediocrity, I would really like to see them pursue Hibbert and Augustin as young, relatively inexpensive pieces to build this team on.

by JDX on Jan 17, 2012 1:21 AM PST reply actions  

Augustin is really bad.

He’s a worse version of JCrarford minus five or six inches.

by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 2:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Which Crawford Are You Talking About?

Crawford is 31. Augustin is 24. When you say Augustin is a lesser version of Crawford, are you talking about today’s Crawford, or the Crawford of 7 years ago? Actually, forget that question because you’re wrong on both parts. Normally, I don’t like drawing comparisons between players who fill fundamentally different positions, but since you brought it up…

In their first 4 seasons Augustin has averaged a higher efficiency rating (19 vs. 17.5). They averaged the same amount of points (each about 11), Augustin has averaged slightly more assists, Augustin less turnovers (1.5 vs. 1.8), and Augustin has shot better from the field (41% vs. 39%) and the free throw line. Crawford has slight edges in rebounding and steals, but that’s about it. Certainly, if you had to err on either side, a better case could be made that Augustin has been better thus far.

in their current roles, Augustin is unquestionably fairing much better than Crawford. The former has a PER of > 18 while the latter struggles to stay over 14. Augustin is currently shooting better from the field and from 3-point range. Moreover, nearly all of Augustin’s relevant statistics are on the upswing while the opposite is true of Crawford. No one in their right mind would suggest Augustin is worse than Crawford currently.

Do I think Augustin would go down as the best Blazer point guard ever? No. Do I think Augustin will ever be an All-Star? No.

I certainly believe though, that he is a solid complimentary player (not unlike Matthews) that could be built around a foundation of Aldridge and a star center. Definitely better than what Felton is showing us now. But none of these statistics is even the best part. The key about Augustin is that you could get him for cheap! Maybe even as cheap or cheaper than Matthews! That’s huge when it comes down to those times when you want to spring a little extra to sign that max mid-level.

by JDX on Jan 17, 2012 3:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Augustin is a chucker

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Agree to disagree then.

Or engage is frivolous personal attacks.

by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 11:33 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Nothing Personal or Frivolous Here, and Definitely Not Agreeing to Disagree

Just pointing out some general flaws with your statement, that’s all. Saying “we agree to disagree” is creating a logical relativism as if one can’t easily compare objective data pertaining to the differences between Augustin and Crawford.

If you really believe Augustin is worse than Crawford, then stick by it and give support for why you think so. On the other hand, if you’re too disinterested to engage in the discussion, then there’s really no need to make the statement to begin with as such a statement is, by definition, frivolous.

by JDX on Jan 18, 2012 5:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Im not allowed to have my own perspective based off my own criteria now?

Both players have a gunners mentality. Jamal’s best is better than Augustin’s best. Augustin’s team just drafted his replacement. At least Jamal is 6’5". There are lies and there are statistics. I’ll stick with the eyeball test. Jamal is the better player.

by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 18, 2012 8:28 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I have to give it to Augustin

he is a far superior passer to Crawford, particularly this year with a 7.2/2.5 A/T ratio, as opposed to Crawford 3.2/2, he’s also outshooting Crawford this year % wise.

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 9:26 AM PST up reply actions  

but the stats don't care about clutch shots

or dominate games. So they don’t matter right?

by AR-15 on Jan 18, 2012 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Fallible Logic

Purvis Short played small forward for the Warriors and tallied a 59 point game. Scottie Pippen never once scored 50 points. By your logic, Short was a better player than Pippen.

Damon Stoudemire scored 50 points for the Blazers one game. John Stockton never once broke the half-century mark. Again, Stoudemire is clearly a better player than Stockton, right?

Still not convinced of the 50 point rule? Tracy Murray, Cliff Robinson, Tony Delk, Allan Houston, Rashard Lewis, Terry Cummings… all guys who have registered 50 points in a game while Kevin Garnett has yet to accomplish the feat once.

I think I’ve made my point. Single game accomplishments whether they be a high point total or a game-winning shot, are ill-effective as the single marker determining who a better player is.

A long record of statistics, especially the rating of what a player contributes to a team, is much more effective which is not surprising why GMs use these tools when exchanging players.

When all is said and done and both players are retired, Crawford may very well prove to have had the better career. But when comparing the two side-by-side on as equal ground as possible, Augustin fares better every time.

by JDX on Jan 18, 2012 10:12 PM PST up reply actions  

You are comparing a lot of guys

who have different roles on a team. Scotty wasn’t a 6th man scorer off the bench, or a #1 option, he shouldn’t have ever had a 50 point game. John Stockton was Robin to The Mail Man’s Batman. KG however was a #1 option for the TWolves but also has always been known as a defensive guy first, Jamal has never been thought of as anything but a pure scorer.

by AR-15 on Jan 18, 2012 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Crawford had plenty of chances to prove

he was a #1 option, though. Augustin also doesn’t have a true 2nd option either. For who he is passing to, his numbers are astounding this year.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 11:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Ding Ding! We Have a Winner!

Thank you for corroborating my point! This is exactly what I was getting at. It’s ridiculous to label someone a better player than another just based on single game performances (e.g. 50 points).

I wouldn’t expect Augustin to have a 50 point game any more than I would another player whose primary role is to run the offense and create opportunities for other players.

There are so many other factors like the ones you described (teammates, overall contribution, etc.). This is precisely why Crawford is no more a better player than Augustin for having scored 50 in a game than Tracy Murray is better than KG.

More simply, it’s the exact reason why the Crawford vs. Augustin comparison is a poor one to begin with.

by JDX on Jan 18, 2012 11:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m glad we’re on the same page

by AR-15 on Jan 19, 2012 12:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe You Need New Glasses For Your Eyeball Test

Really? Do you want to continue to compare these two players? They play different positions and one has seen his prime years pass by while the other has yet to enter his. The first fallacy is the comparison, in general. But since you insist.

While Augustin does look to score as well as pass, I’m not sure you could qualify him as having a “gunners” mentality. Certainly not if the minimum expectation is the style of play that Crawford exhibits. Just take this season thus far. Augustin is averaging 10 more minutes per game, yet only takes one addition shot more than Crawford. Looking at their first 4 years side-by-side, Crawford averaged a significantly greater number of field goal attempts per minute in nearly all seasons (the only exception being their rookie seasons when the each attempted roughly 0.3 shots per minute).

Not only this, but as has already been clearly established, Augustin is a better distributor and protector of the rock. Not exactly the key characteristics of a “gunner.”

You mention that Jamal’s best is better than Augustin’s best. Not sure what your point is. Last time I checked, you don’t get bonus wins for having a 50 point game.

That’s why it’s important to look at the product as a whole which is where these stats come in. Also not sure by what you mean with “there are lies and there are statistics.” I think what you mean is the expression, “figures don’t lie but liars can figure.” This is a typical stance that those whose argument is weakened by the objective data. To claim that the statistics are misleading due to chance, bias, or confounding.

Looking over 4 seasons certainly provides enough data to remove chance, and bias is eliminated due to the pure transparency of NBA recording. This leaves confounding. Sure, it’s impossible to truly compare head to head the statistics of two players, playing for different teams, supported by different teammates, in remote seasons. That’s where the efficiency and PER scores come in handy. The adjust for confounding variables such as the pace at which the team plays. Are they perfect? No, but they’re the best we’ve got. Undoubtedly better than the “eyeball test” which is just another way to say anecdotal evidence. Of which, is the least reliable form of evidence to support an argument.

In the end, I wouldn’t even try to compare the two as it’s just a bit unfair. That being said, if forced, Augustin has a clear advantage. Will he continue to produce at a higher level than Crawford has? Don’t know. Will he ever have a (meaningless) 50 point game? Don’t care. What I do know and what I do care about, is that the Blazers need to have a better point guard, and Augustin would be a cheap guy that could fill that role.

by JDX on Jan 18, 2012 9:46 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Thats just a well written, with many good points.

Rec.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 11:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Look you have your opinion. Just don't be a jerk.

I don’t like Augustin’s game. Get over yourself.

by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 20, 2012 2:37 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Williams

Why doesn’t Williams want to come to Portland? He played in Utah, of all places, and is now in NJ? Hmm. He comes to Portland and he gets 3 teammates who are entering their prime, and It allows McMillan to return to his half court offense.

by JudgeDridge on Jan 17, 2012 7:06 AM PST up reply actions  

he probably isn't getting howard

even if he does he has no decent role players to work with. portland has great second and third options in aldridge and wallace/batum, along with solid role players in matthews, thomas, and maybe smith. if we can get a starting center, then that’d be a solid team

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

NJ is 1 of 4 teams Howard said hed play for

So I have to assume that NJ still has a chance of landing DH. If Howard doesnt go to NJ then its possible Deron would go to another team, maybe us. I do agree with
“if we can get a starting center, then that’d be a solid team” that is soooo true!

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

since New Jersey really has nothing attractive on the roster outside D-will,

and D-Will is probably going to become a free agent and choose where he wants to go next year, i’m assuming Howard isn’t really insisting after the Nets.

Honestly, if Dwight Howard and the Magic were smart, I’d say they should go for a trade to Chicago, who can offer both Noah and Boozer, and who Dwight Howard can automatically turn into a championship team with the scariest defense in the league.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Except Boozer sucks

when he isn’t in a contract year and is way over paid. I’m sure they would like Noah but I’m not so sure they would want Boozer.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

if they don't

I’m sure some other team might be willing to gamble on boozer and will trade another asset for the bulls to send to Orlando.

but yeah, they have no need for boozer, ryan anderson is already doing a better job for them at the 4.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Anderson could slide over to the 3 spot

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

actually yeah that'd make sense.

I didn’t think about that. orlando might try to throw in turkoglu’s contract, so moving anderson to the three spot could help a lot. though i don’t know how well he can defend Small forwards.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I wondered about that

I don’t know if he has the lateral quickness, but he has a big length and strength advantage at the SF spot. Ideally, his offense would make up for his defense. But with no Howard, that team would need all the defenders they could get.

Though if I were Orlando, I would insist on Noah, Boozer, and Deng, and CHI would have to take back J-Rich and Hedo.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

deng would probably be a stretch for chicago

but I guess they might just go for it if it’ll get them dwight.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

the thought of Rose & Howard

on the same team is extremely frightening.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, Chicago would have close to decade with those two to put together a winner

And the best part is, they could still throw out a starting lineup of Rose, J Rich, Korver, Gibson, and Howard this season with Asik, Hedo, and Rip off the bench.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 6:03 PM PST up reply actions  

IMO

thats the worst part, not the best.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 6:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that was poorly worded on my part

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

They would probably not have the leagues best defense without Deng

Howard would be an upgrade on Noah, but Ronnie Brewer would be the only elite perimeter defender on the roster, and he’s not likely to play more than 24 mins per game.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 6:09 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, but they still have the best defensive coach in the league

and they could probably acquire a great perimeter defender in trades or free agency.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I dunno, Deng is a great two-way player

I think Crash, Iggy, Wade, and Lebron might be the only more complete wings in the NBA.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

but look at what SVG has done with Orlando's defense

just with Howard and a bunch of sieves on the wing

"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11

by austinpwnz on Jan 18, 2012 12:45 AM PST up reply actions  

True

But they aren’t the NBA’s best D, and if they do that trade, CHI’s defense would be Howard and bunch of sieves on the wing. They’d still be elite, but maybe not league leading.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

If I'm the Magic

I think the Clippers can present the most interesting offer in the NBA.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

if they're willing to include blake?

definitely but otherwise I don’t see billups, mo williams, or butler being much better than bynum or noah.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

that or

Deandre Jordan, a much higher upside center prospect then Noah is.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

he's overpaid

and though he’s got a whole lot of upside on defense, he doesn’t really have it figured out.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Lakers can still make a better offer

The best the Clippers can offer without including Blake is Mo Williams, DeAndre Jordan, and Caron Butler for Howard, Hedo, and Duhon (I’m only using a rough assumption of salary figures, so a real deal would probably look different).

LAL can offer either Pau Gasol or Andrew Bynum, either of which would be better than the Clips deal. But LAL can also offer BOTH in exchange for Howard and Hedo. The team around Kobe and Dwight would suck, probably not as good as the Clips with CP3 and Griffin, but it’s still better for Orlando.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

If your the Clippers

why not give them Griffin, honestly? they are the only team that can give back a true superstar in return & a dominant center is far better then a dominant power forward.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 6:00 PM PST up reply actions  

true, but Griffin sells tickets like no other

and the Clippers have sort of been considered Griffin’s team so far the past few years.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 6:04 PM PST up reply actions  

You made it sound like you would send them Jordan in place of Griffin

But, yeah, if it were my team, I’d trade Griffin for Howard in a heartbeat. I don’t know that Sterling would, though. The marginal returns on taking on that salary starts to lose some luster.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Very good post.

I definately like Hibbert and Augustin isn’t bad either. I do think we should trade everyone except WES NIC LA

Batum Shakalaka

by WesMoneyy on Jan 17, 2012 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

eveyrone else is on the trading block

actually, I would trade Nic and Wes if and only if it was a blockbuster trade for a superstar like Howard or something. LMA should never be traded IMO no matter what.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I think I'd give up Batum/Matthews for Iguoudala, Rondo or Danny Granger

aside from those top tier wings, we should be looking for a center.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I used to be Batum's biggest advocate

but with the stacked draft this coming year, Wallace’s dominant play, our desperate need for a center & what seems to be Paul Allens “Win Now” mentality… We might be better off trading him this season while his value is high with a rookie scale contract. The ability to acquire a good reserve forward is a lot easier to acquire then a good starting center.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

true

ive watched our most valuable assets over the years become less and less valuable over time until they were hardly worth anything at all in trade value. Batum might be our biggest trade bait instead of GW, but its 1 or the other IMO.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

My stance has changed back and forth on who should be our

Small Forward going into the future. Though most recently I have sided with Wallace because he is more productive right now & gives us the best chance to win now. This up-tempo team with strong defensive guards is prime & ready for a point guard who can handle the duty. Felton isn’t the guy, if we can get Nash I say we do it & then use our cash on Hibbert next year. Resign Nash with the full MLE & get ready to make a run.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Batum and GW each are phenomenal talents

it is hard to decide between the 2 i agree. Nash and Hibbert would be great additions. Count me in on the Nash Hibbert Train – all aboard!

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

What About...

Looking at upgrading at the C in the draft? Couple guys named Andre Drummond, Jared Sullinger, Anthony Davis, John Henson, that guy from Syracuse “melo” looks pretty decent although i don’t know if he will be coming out. Meyers Leonard is a projected mid 1st round seven-footer, as well as Tyler Zeller and Robert Sacre. I’d really like to see front office look hard at this draft, they’re loads of talent.
Especially at the PF/C position. Which we are in dire need of.

"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "

by jbay4 on Jan 17, 2012 7:43 AM PST reply actions  

I like the Okafor and Landry trade

precisely because it addresses those 2 issues, center and backup PF for LMA. IMO we should go after those 2 players in a trade. It seems like the most reasonable possibility on the trade front of actually happening. Alot of scerarios are just based around untradeable or coveted players the other team would want to keep and are therefore unlikely to happen. I like the idea of the draft, but it scares me because weve had atrocious luck in the draft over the years. LMA is the 1 bright shiny piece weve got from our drafting. The draft is a lottery, you might win but the chances are you will lose. Plus we tend to squander our young talent, leaving them on the bench not allowing them PT and thus causing them to lose trade value. Its happened time and time again.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I understand where you are coming from

But i want a championship team. Not a second round team. IMO, laundry and Okafor for Wallace and Camby gets us to the second round. But certainly NOT anywhere near championship level. That is why i suggest younger players who can develope and be better than Okafor or Laundry in 2 years when LMA, Wes, Batum, Felton ..etc. are still in their prime. I still think we need more pieces than a younger center. For instance, Shooting. It’s terrible. Yeah it may come together, but we shouldnt be saying that for 4-5 games straight. IMO, going younger is never a bad decision. I’d rather trade wallace for Drummond, than wallace for Okafor

"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "

by jbay4 on Jan 17, 2012 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

this, well said.

though Wallace won’t land ya Andre Drummond.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Allen does not want to start rebuilding again, but I think Cho was right and that´s the way we should go if we want to get a chance in this decade.

We missed our shot when both Roy and Oden went down.

I´m patient. I would trade for draft picks and young guys like Derrick Williams, who might cost us Wes or Batum. Minesota has already Kevin Love at the same position, is having a bad time finding playing time for him, and needs a good shooting guard.

by amlmart1 on Jan 17, 2012 9:06 AM PST reply actions  

2012 Draft is nice.

OJ Mayo is VERY nice, IMO, too. I would trade Wesley for OJ any day, but the best part is, it probably wouldn’t even cost that much (NJ was going to do Morrow for Mayo straight up and Indiana was McBob and a 1st for Mayo)

Batum Shakalaka

by WesMoneyy on Jan 17, 2012 11:47 AM PST reply actions  

Im just not a fan of the draft unless we have a top ten pick or something

Weve had terrrible luck drafting players-LMA being the 1 good player weve drafted. Im mean we ACTUALLY drafted BABBIT for god sake, who in their right mind would draft LUKE FReAKIN BABBITT?

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually we traded Martell Webster

For Luke Babbitt and Ryan Gomes…

If you’re taking credit for us drafting Babbitt, then we also drafted Batum.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 17, 2012 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly my point.

We didn’t draft Babbitt and we didn’t draft Batum, we traded for both of them.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 17, 2012 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

word my bad

but do you agree that the draft isnt where we should upgrade or do you think we should use the draft to make an upgrade?

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we could draft Mike Moser next year

and replace Batum’s production of the bench. Allowing us to trade him this year for a C

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed.

We are no longer in a position to hope that the injection of talent we get from the draft will be able to contribute at any high level before LaMarcus is rounding 30. Sure we can aim to add a couple role players through the draft, but for franchise changing talent, at this junction in time, our only option is a trade. I’ll post my idea once I work on it a bit more.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 17, 2012 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

i agree

the draft is cool but not a sure thing. Trading for a player with proven skills is as close as you can get to a sure thing.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Felton was coming off a near all-star season

Now he is struggling. Nothing is a sure thing, i’d rather be young and unsure with potential than old and unsure.

"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "

by jbay4 on Jan 17, 2012 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Playing under D'Antoni and Karl inflates your stats.

You should take those last season numbers with a few heavy grains of salt…

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 17, 2012 2:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel like that's not a valid argument..

cause if that was the case. Andre Miller’s stats would be inflated ( they aren’t) Ty Lawson’s, Birdman’s, Bill walker…. none of them have inflated stats. Carmelo and Amare do, because they are the best players. Felton is struggling compared to the last two seasons, no matter how you put it.

"Tommy: Did you hear I finally graduated?
Richard Hayden: Yeah, and just a shade under a decade too. All right. "

by jbay4 on Jan 17, 2012 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

cant wait to hear your trade idea aswell : )

too bad the trade machine is down, it helps formulate some of these things

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Trade checker on RealGM works.

WHO? Who you ask drafted Babbitt well I know you know it was KP and Buchanan. I don’t know if Buchanan is the guy to lead us forward.

by XBlazerfan on Jan 17, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm assuming Paul Allen is biding his team

on a GM who is currently under contract. I would like to see Geoff Petrie for pure nostalgia reasons.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

time*

gosh dernit.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

he's done a horrible job in sacramento though

just horrifying. Maybe it’s just a combination of inertia and the worst owners in the league, but it’s pretty worrying.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

no doubt.

hence the nostalgia reason. If we just want a puppet with a face, we should just hire a former player.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

The draft is fine for role players

but yeah, we shouldn’t rely on it to find a franchise cornerstone anytime soon.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

LMA being the one good player we have drafted.

We got 5 good years from what was once considered the best 2 guard in the West behind Kobe.

by FPS NorthWest on Jan 17, 2012 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Since people are being technical

We didn’t actually draft LMA. We drafted Thomas, Chicago drafted LMA, then we traded Thomas and one of the Russians to the Bulls for LMA on draft day.

Though for all intents and purposes I consider a player you get in a draft day trade as someone you drafted.

by AxemanACL on Jan 17, 2012 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I love BROy

but I hope we never draft a player like him again. 5 years for nothing basically and it got us no closer to a championship and we have no trade value in him. Thanks for the memories BROY but I dont want the heartache. Especially if its supposed to be our #1 player, our franchise player, we should get more than 5 years outta him.

by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 17, 2012 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Rockets did

we drafted Darrell Arthur & swapped, I think

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

...is that really different though?

When you trade for a draft pick on draft day its because you wanted to draft that player.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

not really

just a technicality

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 6:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Batum for Ed Davis?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C21dvTGpvM

This guy’s on the Raptors, same height and PER as Okafor, same age as Batum, good shotblocker and rebounder but stuck behind Bargnani who’s finally having an all-star season. I think he would be an excellent pairing with Aldridge.

by hollywood robinson on Jan 17, 2012 11:50 AM PST reply actions  

I'd do it

But don’t let his height deceive you. He lacks the standing reach and wingspan to play C.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Rudy Gay is overpaid

Andre Igoudala is a tent pole, and he’s paid like one.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 17, 2012 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

No thanks to Rudy Gay.

However I’d welcome Iggy with open arms, the guy is one of my favorite NBA players. The thought of him & Gerald Wallace playing on the wings has been one of my dreams for several years. He is also shooting the best 3% of his career so far this year. Here is my scenario

Sixers get:
Nicolas Batum
Wesley Matthews
Chris Johnson
Armon Johnson
Luke Babbitt
First round pick?

Portland gets:
Andre Iguodala

http://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/5992869

I’d do that every day of the week & twice on sundays!

The next move consists of finding a point guard. Kirk Hinrich joining the likes of Iggy & Crash would make us the most dominant perimeter defensive team in the NBA, bar none.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I know this isn't trade discussion

But the haters of Bismack Biyombo are going to be eating crow, at least for one game… In 14 minutes so far for the Bobacts he has recorded 10 points on 5-5 shooting, 7 rebounds, 3 blocks against Dwight Howard & the Orlando Magic. I’m rooting for ya, big fella.

Paul Allen, the 2011 Trail Blazers Owner/GM

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 5:53 PM PST reply actions  

Finished off 11 pts, 10 rbnds, 4 blks

Off of a whole 21 minutes. This is coming off a DNP-CD against the Cavs. No idea what they were thinking there. I’ve been following the Bobcats recently, him and Mullens complement each other pretty well.

by Batumshakalaka on Jan 18, 2012 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

He is to old

and ANOTHER wing? I mean I wouldn’t be mad if it happened, but I’m not pulling for it. I would rather get Ray Allen from them then Paul, if we are trying to grab one of their wings.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

a legit argument.

Well played. Just a thought. I’m more interested in Mcgee \/

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 8:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Javale McGee

Flip Saunders hates his guts but the dude is extremely talented & has production to back it up. NBA leader in blocks….

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 7:23 PM PST reply actions  

Taking a look at their roster

They drafted Chris Singleton but he hasn’t really impressed this year besides his defense. He reminds me of a young Bruce Bowen. They also drafted Jan Vesely at #6 overall & has looked promising, though in a very small amount of minutes.

I think Batum & his proven record as a defender/floor spreading shooter could attract them, not to mention he still has loads of upside. Especially because they have one of his french pals in Kevin Seraphin on the team. We would likely take Singleton back in return & would be fine for us as a reserve SF. With us acquiring McGee, I assume they will demand Oden(Who is on the opposite end of the character spectrum). I’d be willing to send Nolan Smith also, who is good pals with John Wall. Probably need to send them a draft pick or two as well.

I’d send whatever we have to besides Aldridge & Wallace. Good point on Thomas/Camby, I do think he could learn a lot from em’.

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd consider taking Rashard Lewis back

as long as we could resign McGee, though I’m not sure of the bird rights etc.

Blatche is dirty water trash.

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 10:51 PM PST up reply actions  

When does Lewis's monster contract expire?

Anyway, I think they’ll probably amnesty him at the end of the season instead of trading him out.

by YoniRap on Jan 17, 2012 11:24 PM PST up reply actions  

NBA leader in dumb plays too

but hopefully Nate could beat that outa him.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Young man needs guidance.

He definitely is overloaded with “swag”. But you know what, so was Sheed & he turned the corner with Larry Brown, then proceeded to win a championship.

by 420Phenom on Jan 17, 2012 8:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm all for grabbing him

but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t made him self look like an idiot so far this year. Hopefully that just means we can get him for cheap.

by AR-15 on Jan 17, 2012 8:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Someone mentioned OJ Mayo earlier

wasnt he involved in a gun incident with another player while on a plane? Someone please correct me if Im wrong. I think the other player was Rudy Gay but I could be totally wrong.

by L.A.B on Jan 18, 2012 8:58 AM PST reply actions  

OK. A coment about the draft-

We would most likely get One of the Zeller brothers or one of the Plummlee brothers. THey will be good players but will be very rusty at first. THey hav an awful lot to work on before they can provide good production in the NBA. I think it could be better to trade for a good center or pick up one in free agency. I dont want to give up GW or Batum but Im afraid we will soon have to part with one or the other. Deron Williams would be nice. I would have to say no to Nash. I think if Elliott Williams gets more playing time he could do well. Same with Nolan Smith.

by L.A.B on Jan 18, 2012 9:02 AM PST reply actions  

Most likely i see the Blazers getting a SF/PF

Wallace will most likely leave and there are minutes to be had behind Batum and Aldridge next year.

Only other scenario I can foresee is the Blazers moving up in the draft to get Tony Wroten.

There are virtually no starting caliber Centers in the draft besides Andre Drummond.

There are virtually no starting caliber Point Guards except Tony Wroten potentially.

This draft is stacked with SF and PF. Blazers will be better off choosing one of them – unless they move up.

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:23 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm not impressed by Tony Wroten

I think he’ll go too high in this draft (simply because there’s a dearth of PG’s) to a team with poor management, and end up pretty mediocre. There are a lot of guys that will be drafted after him that will likely well out perform him.

I’d really like to trade Batum now for a pick that could land us Michael Kidd-Gilchrist. Barring that, I’d go with Tyler Zeller, Moutaou Yarou, Mike Moser, or roll the dice on Festus Ezeli. Robert Sacre is an option in the second round, but I really hate that guy (Pilots till I die!).

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 1:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I love Wroten. Also like T-Ross.

Perry Jones has potential, but would be way too expensive.

Batum Shakalaka

by WesMoneyy on Jan 18, 2012 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

How we get it done.

Iguodala to Blazers

Philly gets
Batum
Matthews
C.Johnson
Blazers 1st Round Pick

Blazers get
Iguodala

Kirk Hinrich to the Blazers

Hawks get
Raymond Felton
Blazers 2nd round pick

Blazers get
Kirk Hinrich

Then, sign Kenyon Martin to a contract once his Chinese Basketball League contracts expire for contracts the rest of the season. Resign Camby & Martin for vet minimum next year, resign Hinrich for the MLE, sign Roy Hibbert to a 12 Mil a year deal & proceed to win a championship in 2013 :)

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

cuts our depth down without batum,

but if we can pick up a good role player to play backup 3 or point, I’d call it good.

by YoniRap on Jan 18, 2012 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

iggy plays the 2 and 3

and we still have G3. If Elliot is going to be as good as I hope, we could have him back up iggy and jamal at the 2.

by AR-15 on Jan 18, 2012 12:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I am not convinced that

Iguodala is worth giving up both Matthews and Batum. Maybe one of them but not both of them.

by L.A.B on Jan 18, 2012 11:39 AM PST up reply actions  

As long as the sixers are playing like a top 3 team

Iggy isn’t going anywhere. Obviously Hawes and Lou Williams aren’t going to keep up their play for the rest of the season, but that team is playing so well that even when they drop off some, it should still be a force.

by Royster on Jan 18, 2012 12:15 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

No way 76ers Trade anyone

Not when they are playing the way they are.

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

With milwaukee not doing so hot

Would there be a possibility of snagging Bogut out of there?

by Akbar503 on Jan 18, 2012 11:19 AM PST reply actions  

Doubt it.

Bogut is one of the foundational pieces the team is built on. Especially since he likes it in milwaukee.

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

John Hammond is as unpredictable as they come

Sometimes he looks brilliant, other times he looks like a moron. I wouldn’t rule out a youth movement.

However, if Bogut gets moved, I think Milwaukee will wait till next season, when S-Jax, Udrih, Livingston, and Dunleavy will be EC’s. They can then amnesty Drew Gooden, trade Bogut for less salary and/or EC’s (plus other assets), and become players in FA and the draft.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay, I'm not satisfied with it, but I want Bogut and I believe this is semi-plausible

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6ljs74v
Trade: Luke Babbitt, 2012 2nd round pick from Denver and 1.5 million cash for Quentin Richardson and a 2012 1st round pick
Trade: Marcus Camby, Wesley Matthews, More favorable 2012 1st round pick from Portland or Orlando, 2013 2nd round pick and 1.5 million cash for Andrew Bogut and Stephen Jackson

Roster:
PG: Raymond Felton – Nolan Smith – Armon Johnson
SG: Stephen Jackson – Jamal Crawford – Elliot Williams
SF: Gerald Wallace – Nicolas Batum – Quentin Richardson
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge – Craig Smith
C: Andrew Bogut – Kurt Thomas – Chris Johnson – Greg Oden

Taking on the aging and declining headcase Stephen Jackson is the price to pay for getting Bogut. Matthews would have to be included in any deal with Milwaukee considering he’s a hometown product and went to college at Marquette, plus he fills a long term positional need and would make a great, young promising back court duo with Brandon Jennings. A 1st round pick would have to be included going to Milwaukee in this deal even with the salary relief, dumping of bad contract and local hometown awesome Wes Money already going their way, because that’s how valuable Bogut is. Considering we’re picked out until at least 2015, I figured the easiest way to get a pick is to look at a contender with a bad contract, and trade one of our young guys for it, hence the inclusion of Quentin Richardson for Luke Babbitt, if they don’t want Babbitt, I wouldn’t be opposed to giving them Elliot Williams or Nolan Smith, but it’s not preferable.

I know we’re basically the Charlotte Bobcats with a frontcourt that’s on steroids. But LaMarcus is better than anybody that was on that Bobcats squad, and Bogut is a top 3 center in this league. Long term we would seriously need to look for a replacement for our starting SG, because Stephen Jackson is more of a stop gap than an answer, but in terms of building for a contender, getting that dominant defensive C is key imo, and there isn’t a better option out there than Andrew Bogut.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 18, 2012 11:51 AM PST reply actions  

No way Bucks trade their all-star center

unless they get a capable center in return. This makes me laugh.

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

It's called blowing it up for Milwaukee

Something they should have done last year. Bogut will win them some games now, but will hinder their long term opportunities of gathering a franchise changing talent through the draft, which is what they should do. The Bucks have been spinning their wheels for a couple years now not going anywhere, this trade gives them the opportunity to kickstart the rebuilding package while still keeping fan interest alive by bringing in the local boy Matthews. And fine, honestly, I’ll throw in Greg Oden as a filler in that deal any day.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 18, 2012 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

He isn't enough, and from a draft standpoint with Bogut...

They will always be a middle of the road team, winning just enough games to never get a future franchise changing talent but not enough to ever really go anywhere. They are stuck in NBA purgatory, and outside of getting a miraculous steal in the draft, the easiest way to get out of NBA purgatory is to blow it up and tank to get future top talent, especially when you’re a team as small of a market as Milwaukee. Bogut cannot carry a team on his own, but he’s a great complimentary piece on a championship or near-championship caliber team, but Milwaukee ain’t that and never will be considering their undesirability as a free agent location, and their relative mediocrity making sure the likelihood that they get the star perimeiter player they need is basically nil.

Of course, I know my whole trade scenario is a pipe dream merely because Herb Kohl is old and doesn’t want to go through another rebuilding process and never see his team be relatively competitive again before he croaks, but from a logical point of view, Milwaukee needs to shed contracts and go young while tanking for future top draft picks, that’s the only way out of their current predicament.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 19, 2012 12:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Also, Bogut isn't an All-Star

And probably never will be, the combination of his offensive limitations and the fact that he plays for an NBA team in a city that most people don’t even know has an NBA team will basically ensure that he is never an All-Star at least while he’s in Milwaukee.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 18, 2012 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

He's legitimately the #3 true center in the NBA.

He’s definitely All-Star caliber, and just about every team in the NBA knows it.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 1:25 PM PST up reply actions  

The C position is incredibly weak in the NBA, and Bogut has severe offensive limitations.

He’s basically a slightly better/younger Tyson Chandler, important to a championship caliber team or a team one legit C away from being a championship caliber team, but on a team like Milwaukee, with absolutely no true dependable offensive weapons outside of their high usage, inefficient guards, Bogut is misused and it’s a shame to waste his prime years on a team that’s going nowhere, especially considering how much Bogut makes them win just enough to never garner a top draft pick, but isn’t good enough to carry the team in the playoffs if they even reach it. He’s a huge anchor considering the situation in Milwaukee, but fits perfectly on a team like Portland. Honestly, I would trade any combination of players not named LaMarcus Aldrige and Nicolas Batum for Bogut and whatever bloated contracts they wanted to send back, I’m just a homer and wanted to pick him up on the cheap.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 19, 2012 12:35 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with almost everything you said

But Bogut is much better than Tyson Chandler. He’s much better offensively than Chandler, and just as good, if not better, defensively when healthy.

People forget how injury plagued and mediocre Tyson Chandler’s career has been. 10 years in the league, and he’s had one good season with NOLA and Dallas, each, and is looking good so far with NYK. If we are going off of those seasons for Chandler, it’s only fair to compare them to Bogut’s 16-10-2-2.5 season.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 19, 2012 11:59 AM PST up reply actions  

I am well aware that Bogut is much better than Chandler

But my point is his importance and fit in the context of a team, not necessarily exact offensive and defensive skills.

I do believe that Bogut is the second best defensive C, and is slightly more offensively gifted than Chandler, but on a team with real offensive weapons, Bogut would only be called on to put up a line of 12/12/2 blocks a game.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 19, 2012 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, I see you point now. I was mislead by this sentence:

He’s basically a slightly better/younger Tyson Chandler

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 19, 2012 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Understood, it was poorly worded for what I was trying to convey.

The smarter you are, the more likely you are to be tripping balls at any given moment.
/keep Batum/ /trade for Bogut/

by gtbassett on Jan 20, 2012 1:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Blazers number one weakness is no capable low post player who can take the pressure off of Aldridge.

Blazers should really see if they can pull off a trade similar to the Gerald Wallace trade. Blazers could offer Camby’s contract Luke Babbitt, Armon Johnson, and a 2nd round pick for Okafor, and then sign Patty Mills when he is available to play with the NBA

by tyeforshee on Jan 18, 2012 12:18 PM PST reply actions  

Something like this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7pcz598

with a host of picks from PDX and ATL going to MIL. Works well for every team. Blazers can move LMA to C, and get a low-post scorer/paint defender who fits the system. The focus in FA 2012 would be adding a C like Sam Dalembert, which would eventually move Aldridge back to the PF, and allow Josh Smith to act as a Nic Batum replacement and LMA/Crash insurance policy.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 1:34 PM PST reply actions  

Why would you want Josh Smith

over Bogut? Blazers lose in this trade imo.

by AR-15 on Jan 18, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course I'd rather have Bogut

But if the Blazers could nab Josh Smith in any way possible without giving up Gerald Wallace or LaMarcus Aldridge, it has to be considered a win for the Blazers.

Really, Milwaukee is the closest thing to a loser in this trade.

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

meh

I don’t want to get into an argument, so I’ll just agree to disagree.

by AR-15 on Jan 18, 2012 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Healthy discussion is what blogs are all about

Don’t think I’m going to let you off easily!!!!! lol

Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!

by HailOden! on Jan 18, 2012 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

How about this

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8xoeo68
Rondo
Crawford
Batum
Aldridge
Camby

Bench:
Smith, Willams, O’neal, Stiemsma, Thomas, Jhonson, Babbit
It works for the Celtics, and Kings right

by BestBlazerFan on Jan 18, 2012 5:37 PM PST reply actions  

Oh my goodness, I love any trade that brings us Rondo!

Though I’m sure Celtics would also demand Batum, and I would oblige without any issue. With Matthews/Batum they could smoothly transition past the Allen/Pierce era. I’d take a serious look at Ray Allen in free agency next year too.

Though I seriously doubt Kings would want Gerald Wallace, they are looking to go young & rebuild. Nor do I think the Celtics would be looking for DeMarcus Cousins in lieu of losing Rondo, would likely want a PG(Perhaps a high draft pick, landing them Doc Rivers son, Austin Rivers) in addition to Matthews/Batum. There is likely a more ideal 3rd party for a deal like this, then the Kings. To cap it off, Felton’s big drop in production really is the final nail in this deals coffin. However I will hold off hope, that one day Rondo will be a Blazer. Much how I felt about Gerald Wallace.

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

hopefully it comes sooner,

and we can get a few more years with him. but I don’t think rondo will want to stay through a rebuilding process, especially since it’ll take boston some time to recover and they’ve mad a few questionable moves lately.

by YoniRap on Jan 18, 2012 7:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Works

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=82hs3ga
Rondo
Matthews
Wallace
Aldridge
Haywood
Bench: Crawford, Marion, Thomas, Smiths, Babbit, Jhonsons

Why it works:
Mavs: They are trying to clear room for the 2012 F/A class, so we will get 60.5 million dollars they still own Marion, and Haywood, getting camby who is becoming a F/A this up coming summer will clear 11.2 Million.

Celtics: They will get Batum a kid filled with potential, few draft picks, cash, Felton, and trash in both the Jhonsons I would give them Matthews if they asked for him. it would look like this http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6oqr66l lets face it if the Celtics stay bellow 500 Ray Allen will not resign with them.

It works for Portland chances of this happening 1/1000000 but hey its just an idea

by BestBlazerFan on Jan 18, 2012 8:14 PM PST reply actions  

Celtics still don't land enough talent

If Raymond Felton was killing it for us, it might have worked if Matthews was included. But not now he is stinking it up here in Rip City.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 18, 2012 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't give the team away

Some of these trades have Portland giving up half of the team, and getting one mediocre-to-good player. Uh, no thanks, guys…..Iggy is a fine player, but I wouldn’t sell the entire farm, minus LMA, to get him. He does not impress me That much…..As for the draft vs. F.A. thing, Portland’s ability to draft is seriously in question. Their recent history is not good. One more injury-prone star, and I’ll become a non-Blazers-fan, I swear. Loved Roy. Love Oden. Shouldn’t have drafted either one, IMO….Given that poor recent history, F.A. seems the better avenue. These trades you guys have come up with are not good for Portland At All, in most cases, I think. Don’t sell the farm, unless you get fair return for said farm.

by The Keizer on Jan 19, 2012 6:52 AM PST reply actions  

I'm done arguing, but will simply say.

Matthews, Batum < Iguodala.

Period. Would trade both for him, as would our GM(Whoever that really is).

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 19, 2012 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Back-up PG and PF Idea

Minnesota has tons of both…we give up Matthews, make Crawford the starting 2 and let Williams/Smith get a little back-up time.

Drastically improve our 2nd unit with Ridnour at PG and Tolliver at PF.

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6vlb8x7

by jons_guitar on Jan 19, 2012 8:18 AM PST reply actions  

I hate the fact that chuck hayes is stuck on a losing team in sacramento,

while we decided to spend our money on chuckford instead. what would it take to pry him away from sacramento? maybe we could grab one of their 200 combo guards as well.

by YoniRap on Jan 19, 2012 11:11 AM PST reply actions  

I like this idea.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 19, 2012 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

he is going to miss 3-4 weeks with a dislocated shoulder

with his contract & ultimate value(when you consider a starting center like Okefor/Gortat could be obtained), I’d give them no more then CJ/Babbit/Armon + a 2nd round pick. I’m sure another team can provide more value too. He just isn’t worth losing Wesley or Nic for. They more guards then they know what to do with.

Yeah. Definitely should have spent our $$$ on Hayes.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 19, 2012 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

This is the most ridiculous thing you will ever read, but hear me out.

We all know the draft lottery is rigged. Thus, giving our recent injury history, I think that if we were to somehow get a lottery pick from anywhere, I think it is possible that David Stern shows us some sympathy.

It’s crazy and I’m probably hallucinating right now, but think about it.

Batum Shakalaka

by WesMoneyy on Jan 19, 2012 3:09 PM PST reply actions  

Only thing I disagree with

is Stern giving us sympathy. There have been WAYYYYYY to many “coincidences” to think otherwise.

by AR-15 on Jan 19, 2012 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Just about everybody on this team

is trade material.
The problem is are we going to trade to get better or worse?

by 58rhodes on Jan 19, 2012 7:06 PM PST reply actions  

A guy like Kaman could probably be had really easily and help out a lot

It’s difficult picturing a deal that makes a lot of since there, though.

volatilelyle.com

by almost awesome on Jan 19, 2012 7:29 PM PST reply actions  

New Orleans will deal Okefor

because they are looking to shed total salary for a franchise sale of the Hornets from the NBA.

"We gotta get this $#!^ together guys!" - Phil

by 420Phenom on Jan 19, 2012 10:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we should go after Nash

Suns/Blazers trade:

Blazers get: Steve Nash, Jared Dudley, Robin Lopez
Suns get: Raymond Felton, Wesley Matthews, Marcus Camby

Why Portland does it:
Comes out with a smart, three-point shooting veteran PG and a mentor for Nolan Smith, a solid long-distance sharp-shooter in Jared Dudley, and an energetic, solid center in need of more minutes.

Why Phoenix does it:
Comes out with a younger PG who can push the ball, a young, energetic, scrappy player in Wesley Matthews, and a decent veteran center with an expiring contract.

by IsaacFHarris on Jan 21, 2012 1:49 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think the EC helps PHX

they want young talent and draft picks. Young talent is cheap so I don’t think they care much about EC, also WEs$ isn’t exactly a guy you build around.

by AR-15 on Jan 21, 2012 3:22 PM PST up reply actions  

A serious trade

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6vl8xnr
This trade helps all parties. The bulls are in a win now mode a will need a guy like camby for a playoff run. Babbitt replaces the long term 3 ball. Sac. Gets some sf vet help missing from the team. We get a PF/c and out side shooter at the 3.

Felton. Smith
Matthews Crawford Williams
Batum, Korver
Aldridge, Thomas, smith, cj
Hibbert, Thomas, oden, cj

Much more size and shooting. We can also try and turn Crawford around to a playoff contender for pick.

by Cabbol on Jan 22, 2012 9:56 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm