Game 13 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 84, New Orleans Hornets 77
In a Nutshell
In honor of Martin Luther King Day the Blazers and Hornets play a game so nondescript that it practically begged viewers to go read a copy of Letters from a Birmingham Jail, listen again to "I Have a Dream", or do anything they could to escape the monotony. On the bright side the Blazers did more things right than the Hornets and nabbed a much-needed win.
Game Flow
The only pretty points scored in the first period for either team came on the break following forced turnovers and run-outs for the Trail Blazers. It wasn't a matter of everything going wrong for both teams. Rather all the things that went right conspired to prevent sustainable scoring. New Orleans rebounded the ball excellently. The Blazers defended the paint well. The Hornets returned the favor. That left both teams bereft of easy shots in the halfcourt, shooting eyesore jumpers. The only exception, as just noted, came when the Blazers trapped the ball and played the passing lanes. New Orleans lacks true point guards and the Blazers exploited their ball-handlers for turnovers and finishes. This let the Blazers grab a lead until the bench came in and tried to give it back through their own turnovers. (Groan.) The Blazers still led 20-15 after one, though. (Groan.)
The second quarter would actually get worse. (GROAN!)
The Blazers actually improved their rebounding in the second period but the turnovers dried up. New Orleans' size and athleticism off the bench was sufficient to keep the Blazers out of the paint completely in the halfcourt. The result was more jumpers (groan) and more misses (groan). The Hornets didn't exactly set the world on fire either. In fact their collective offense wouldn't be enough to set a marshmallow on fire. If you discount 11 points scored from the free throw line the teams combined for 26 points in the period (groan). The Blazers totaled 17 points in the second while the Hornets managed 20. Portland led 37-35 at the half. Groooooaaaaaaannnnnnnn. Just shoot me now.
Thankfully the Blazers came alive in the third period, giving viewers exactly one quarter of watchable basketball. (Yay!) The Hornets still tried to pack in the defense but the Blazers moved the ball against their slower, larger defenders and came away with a combination of open mid-range jumpers and quick slashes into the lane. This looked like a blizzard of scoring compared to the isolation brick-fest of the first half. The 27 points the Blazers scored seemed a feast. New Orleans, meanwhile, puttered along with 16. Portland led 64-51 at the end of the third.
With the Hornets offense being what it is, this double-digit lead should have invoked the league's Mercy Rule. Sadly the refs missed the call and let them play the fourth. Nursing their advantage, the Blazers had five defenders place feet in the paint whenever the Hornets tried to post. That and some more decent rebounding were enough to keep New Orleans from getting close. The Blazers win 84-77.
Take Away Points
The Hornets are hurting for production right now.
The Blazers did a great job keeping them out of the paint.
Other than that and some individual observations below, the win was the only true take-away point from this game. Thankfully that's also the only one Portland really needed.
Individual Observations
LaMarcus Aldridge started slowly in this game, a combination of his usual pattern and some nice, big Hornets defenders keying on him. The ball movement in the second half loosened the floor and gave him room to operate. He finished with his standard good game: 10-17 shooting, 22 points, 9 rebounds, 2 steals. His defense and rebounding were nice in this game too.
Gerald Wallace feasted on those early turnovers and otherwise had a good defensive and rebounding game too. He finished 5-11 for 14 points, 7 rebounds, 3 assists.
Kurt Thomas outscored everybody on the floor in that first period, somewhat akin to towering over every person in Munchkin Land. He ended up shooting 4-5 from the floor for 8 points and 7 rebounds in 26 minutes.
Wesley Matthews shot 4-10, 2-5 from the arc in another intermittent game. 10 points.
Raymond Felton had 12 assists (yay!) and some incisive drives (yay!) but also committed 8 turnovers (groan), shot 1-8 (groan!), and his defense alternated between (groan) and (meh).
Nicolas Batum again earned the game ball. He started out with some tough rebounding, helping turn that department to the Blazers. He added some shooting, driving, defense...it was his second excellent effort in a row. A third would be close to a record for him, so let's see what happens against Atlanta. 6-11 shooting, 5-6 from the line, 2-5 from the arc (those shots loosening up the interior for teammates), 19 points, 6 rebounds.
Craig Smith played some nice defense on Chris Kaman and scored on him too. He might have tried to do a little too much offensively. He hit 2-2 from the field for 4 points but also had 2 turnovers and 2 rebounds in 14 minutes.
Jamal Crawford, mired in a slump, spent much of this game giving up the ball. He had 7 assists but also passed up some open shots. That's OK for today but the Blazers do need him to shoot and score. 2-8 shooting, 5 points.
Fun With Numbers
- New Orleans 30 points in the paint. That's the only one you need to know. They would have lost with that number no matter what. Great job by Portland of taking away their only real strength.
Final Thoughts
It's nice to break the losing streak.
If the Blazers seriously thought they could content this year, or were close, they could probably call up the Hornets and make an offer for Emeka Okafor. He has an expensive (Camby-level) contract running through 2014. The Blazers would be luxury-tax payers in 2012-13 and 2013-14. But he's exactly what the Hornets don't need right now--non-scorer, inside player, rebounder and defender, big guy, and expensive--and most of what the Blazers do need. I don't believe the Blazers will assess themselves as being far enough towards elite status to justify the expense. But Okafor should be there for the picking if anyone wants him.
Hear more groaning at At The Hive.
Here's your Trail Blazers vs Hornets boxscore.
Jersey Contest scoreboard and the form for Wednesday.
122 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Crawford
the Blazers do need him to shoot and score. 2-8 shooting, 5 points.
8 shots is plenty for a guy shooting 34.2% from the field. i’d much rather he become a distributor.
PHILLY!
The problem is we need to run our offense for him when he comes off the bench not
have him run the offense for our bench. He should play a strict SG off the bench I say. He pounds the ball trying to run the offense up top and in the end does a quick dribble long 2 too many times.
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
when our bench is in the game...
run our offense for Crawford to get him nice shots and see what happens.
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
we need to run our bench for batum
crawford is doing a horrible job scoring and continues to shoot the ball even when he’s not hot.
crawford is a scorer.
he is on our roster and is a waste of space if we are not getting him shots. Obvioussly batum and Crawford should be free to get their shots
WITH ODEN ON OUR SIDE
Which is why datum should play the 3 Crawford should play the 2
and either Nolan or Elliot should play the one.
by AR-15 on Jan 16, 2012 4:37 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Carl was never as good as the hype, unfortunately
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2012 8:14 PM PST up reply actions
to be fair...
Landry is averaging 27 mins, 13 points, and 5.5 rebounds a game, with a PER above 17 this season.
His 1 year $8million contract was a good signing all around. Hornets have plenty of freedom to sign or not sign him again next year, and he makes higher pay than expected this year, with an opportunity to sign a longer contract this offseason
I wouldn’t mind if the Blazers had him.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 11:47 PM PST up reply actions
ha! thanks tim, but there must be better fans than I out there to want to watch that game
at least from what I could tell during the live thread and post game analysis ;)
A displaced Sonics fan that has somehow emerged as a Blazers fan (and loves it).
by anitachampionship on Jan 16, 2012 4:40 PM PST up reply actions
We also need some real bona-fide rebounding
Camby will help but is too injury-prone to be the solution.
those in the know preach Okafor
therefore, I’m glad Dave mentioned him at the end of the recap.
However, though I’m inclined to trade for Okafor, I’m not sure who we can give up to get him, unless it’s young guys and picks. I’m not sure management would give up Batum, plus he’s got too small of a contract.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 4:35 PM PST up reply actions
You send them Wallace, and free up the starting spot for Batum.
Same argument I make every day. You can’t keep Wallace and Batum. It doesn’t make sense. We will end up watching Wallace walk away this summer anyway because we won’t want to sign him to a 4 year deal.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 16, 2012 5:09 PM PST up reply actions
I think you have to come away with a backup point guard if you trade Wallace for Okafor.
They way you have it opens up a gaping hole at backup point guard.
(32) Felton
(32) Matthews
(32) Batum
You bump up JC to 32 minutes at shooing guard by playing Wesley at the three for 16 minutes a game. That leaves a gaping 16 minute hole behind Felton that I do not think Williams or Smith can fill. Furthermore it takes a giant dump on Kurt Thomas and Craig Smith as well as Gerald Wallace himself.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 16, 2012 5:35 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I guess it's trade either Wallace or Batum
though Wallace seems to be the second best player on the team
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 5:59 PM PST up reply actions
Okafor is not a trade asset for NO....
Expiring contracts are exactly the kind of return they would “love”. Babbitt and Johnson would be throw-ins.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2012 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.
I don’t know why so many people are willing to trade serious pieces for Okafor. The Hornets are being flushed out for their sale to a new owner. You have to get as much value as you can for a guy like CP3, but Okafor is not a great value. Getting MCEC and young filler (and maybe use our 3mil there as well) for Okafor is a fair deal, and we are well positioned make it happen. Heck, if there is anyone in this league that can make a small forward out of Luke Babbitt, it’s Monty Williams.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 16, 2012 11:03 PM PST up reply actions
I guess, if NO really Really want to shed salary
then they might do it. But they’re already losing Kaman to an expiring contract this offseason, and I think NO would rather have younger pieces that they can build around.
but yes, if they are only thinking about taking on short contracts, than Marcus Camby would be a perfect trade.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 11:50 PM PST up reply actions
If it came down to it i'd lean toward Batum
I think he has more value to another team, young, good potential and sound defense. He sounds exactly like someone you don’t want to trade but I got a feeling coach doesn’t appreciate his euro skills. Same with Aldrige , coach loves his power not so much his finesse.
the problem with trading Batum is that his contract doesn't match up money-wise
so we’d be forced to add other players, and currently we only have rookies who are expendable.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 11:48 PM PST up reply actions
If we trade Batum
It should be in a package for an elite wing or guard. Not many of those available.
Batum’s ceiling is very high – in no small part due to his versatility and his overall game (not the same thing). What he lacks in dribble drive, he makes up for in a lot of ways.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 17, 2012 12:01 AM PST up reply actions
It seems like LMA is appreciated for all of his skills.
Batum is being pushed and it is working. Low ball offer…all of a sudden he is playing much more aggressively. Who knew.
Right now I’d like a back up point guard who can play. Nolan apparently isn’t one? Why did the Blazers pick him then?
Why have about 24 guards and use two of them?
why would anyone want to go to Cleveland?
plus, I think Sessions is pretty bad.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 4:36 PM PST up reply actions
Sessions may be even worse defensively.
"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth
by KeepItCopacetic on Jan 16, 2012 5:14 PM PST up reply actions
Just think, at one time (long ago) we had Terry Porter and Clyde Drexler in our frontcourt.
And now we have Felton and Crawford. Sigh, our PG issues feels eternal.
we did have dre and roy for a few stretches
that was actually a pretty good duo, but people like to make it out as if those two clashed with one another.
PHILLY!
Yeah, you're right. Dre was very competent, just never really got a fair shake here.
I guess it’s not really fair to compare to Drex and TP; those guys were legendary. But it serves as a crazy marker of the difference in talent that exists out there.
Crawford isn't in our starting backcourt
don’t compare apples to oranges. Matthews is a perfectly competent SG.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
Fair point
but I’m firmly in the “these guys are better than they look right now” camp. Felton and Crawford weren’t pulled out of the D-league last week, they’ve both proven themselves to be good players on other teams. Shooting slumps are painful, but you shoot your way out of them. It’s not as if Felton’s career three-point numbers are an accident, and Crawford is known for his streaky dead-eye. By March we’ll be glad we have them.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
by Doctor Worm on Jan 16, 2012 7:19 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
Crawford.
I’m not as down on Crawford as I am on Felton. Jamal is what he is. I think everyone knew this before the signing, and really, he shouldn’t be playing the point. I believe if used correctly, say a scoring punch at the end of a quarter, he’s fine for that. But I’m a bit nervous about Felton. I can understand a shooting slump for it can happen to anyone and the hope is they’ll shoot their way out as you say. Of course there can always be a case of a Rudy who seemed to never regain his rookie year stroke. Anyway, Raymond is just looking rather underwhelming running the offense. Sure, he has some high moments but they’re completely overshadowed by some awful, awful mistakes. He’s been given the reigns to orchestrate this team and make life easier on Aldridge by making his 3 point attempts. So far, a bit of a failure here. At least with Dre, he set up LaMarcus with at least 2 to 3 easy lobs. Well, here’s hoping Felton will prove his doubters wrong.
Felton gets Aldridge involved in a more reliable fashion.
The easy lobs were not only easy to convert – they were easy to scout, and stop. Felton is finding Aldridge in pick-and-roll situations. Let me repeat that. Aldridge is running the pick-and-roll. I need to see a lot more of Felton before I write him off.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 16, 2012 10:20 PM PST up reply actions
One thing about today's game I forgot to comment on
was the Pick and Roll game. Aldridge rolled, today. Aldridge ROLLED!!!!!
It was good, very good to see.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 17, 2012 12:02 AM PST up reply actions
Aldridge had a whole TWO FEET in the painted area!
We even saw Aldridge steal the ball and try to “dribble” the length of the court! I even think I saw Apdridge dribble from the three point line towards the hoop! Kidding aside, I really like when Aldridge is in motion going towards the rim – I think it is the next step in his evolution as a player. This and setting a screen where he actually comes in contact with the opposing teams guard.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 17, 2012 1:11 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
yes...SO TRUE!!!
This and setting a screen where he actually comes in contact with the opposing teams guard.
OMG, Howard has added the Clippers to his "wish list"....
I hate what the NBA has become…
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
If he was smart he would come here
He’d get a championship that way
Howard with our core = Championship
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 4:34 PM PST up reply actions
we'd have to give up too much
that we couldn’t maintain our core
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 4:36 PM PST up reply actions
if we traded for him, yes
but not if he walks after the season and we pick him up
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 4:37 PM PST up reply actions
even less likely than trading for him
D12 is not coming here. I’m not even that big a fan of his anymore, though obviously I’m not arguing his talent or dominance.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 4:38 PM PST up reply actions
Very little chance
but it really would be pretty smart for him. Sure there are other options, but we should have some cap space and he would be kind of our missing link.
i admit there is zero chance
but I still drool over the thought
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 5:34 PM PST up reply actions
The guy was drooling over our fans and arena.
He obviously likes playing in Portland, even on the visiting team.
Johnson, Johnson, Smith, Smith, Thomas, Williams, and Babbitt: the Blazer's law firm.
crawford
Jamal Crawford, mired in a slump, spent much of this game giving up the ball. He had 7 assists but also passed up some open shots. That’s OK for today but the Blazers do need him to shoot and score. 2-8 shooting, 5 points.
I don’t agree here. Crawford tends to be a chucker. That means that even when he shoots 50%, his misses are out of the flow of the offense and tend to produce fewer offensive rebounds and more fast break points. this is the danger of a chucker. The rest of the team becomes passive when you don’t share the ball.
Thus every assist that he gets in lieu of a jumper is a good thing and I daresay that his assist numbers and our win totals are more likely to correlate than his scoring.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
of course the ideal
is a player who can do both, score and assist in the flow of a team offense. But these are rare commodities in the NBA.
We had a guy like that last 3 years, but chose to trade him to Denver!
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
That guy lights to pout
when he comes off the bench. And we need this guy to come off the bench.
Miller started in Portland.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
Eventually He started
After he pouted. Funny to see miller had the same numbers (minus 2 pt percentage slight t/o advantage) as felton now. Plus we have a better record. At this time last year we were 9-11.
by comptoncory on Jan 16, 2012 10:29 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Especially true if Batum is the recipient of his passes,
Kills two birds with one stone, stops JC from taking all the shots and gets Batum into the game more.
hg
I wonder how Batum would fair setting picks in the pick-and-roll.
It could be awesome. Maybe even something kinda like the Matrix.
by Oden Mad, Oden Smash! on Jan 16, 2012 10:22 PM PST up reply actions
Every year
I wonde if this team is “special,” able to put maximum effort and drive for betterment into each moment on the floor, blow games open so wide the deep bench plays the second half. And every year I am proved wrong. Slow starts, sloppy play, indifference, laziness, all this keeps stars on the floor, make them more tired, makes the wear down worse, knocks us out of the playoffs.
Sucks
"All is vanity and vexation of spirit."
http://year5000.bandcamp.com
by Y5k on Jan 16, 2012 4:20 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Inre: Felton and Crawford
I realize we’re still early in an odd season, but from what they’ve done so far, do y’all think the Blazers will or should make an effort to retain Crawford and Felton beyond this year? Are they, on net, giving this team more than they’re taking? I realize that such a decision always hinges on what other (better) options are available this summer, but I don’t think anyone’s been thrilled with either guy this year.
Well if each of them keep playing this way
they won’t be getting that big contract. So maybe we could keep them on the cheap.
I like the way you think Dave, i'll take Okafor anyday of the week!
With a center, we are legit contenders, without a center, 2nd round is still possible but that is the limit, no higher than 2nd round-with a center(maybe Okafor) we should be considered contenders for the WCF.
What might we have to give up to get Okafor?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 4:33 PM PST reply actions
Sadly I dont think well get okafor
Thats a big contract and the front office is clearly not giving up on oden and we have joel freeland most likely coming over next season who wants starter type minutes. I want emeka though!! I said trade camby and batum? Or camby and crawford for omeka +landry?? Or just camby and draft picks?
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 4:38 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Hmmm...
Not sure whether Okafur is attainable, but you figure that Camby’s gone anyway after this season. Oden will probably split, too, and I suspect the front office is realistic about this. Bring Freeland over, then, and put him up front with Okafur and Kurt Thomas (who won’t demand huge minutes) next year.
more than a few BEdgers have mentioned Okafor as a nice pickup for PDX
however, I have to disagree that Freeland will be getting “big” mins, let alone starter mins, or that he’ll even come over.
Lol, why would NO trade Landry and Okafor for Camby and Crawford? lol, it makes me laugh when Blazer fans over appreciate our trade assets. Camby is injured, Crawford is not tearing up the league, and NO would only trade them if they wanted to cut salary in the long term, since Jamal and Marcus wouldn’t be there after this season. Why trade for Camby, when Okafor is younger and paid relatively the same.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 4:43 PM PST up reply actions
Doubt they'd send Landry over in the deal...
But if they’re looking to clear salary for a post-CP3 rebuild, they could pull an Okafur for Camby deal similar to the Wallace-Pryzbilla deal that Portland and Charlotte did last year. Blazers’d probably need to toss in draft picks and/or other young talent to make the Hornets bite.
Im not sure how we get Okafor or who we trade to get him
just that we’d we better off if we did get him.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 5:37 PM PST up reply actions
I ment so say batum plus
Camby and crawford for landry and emeka. Anyways freeland has said he does want to come play for us next season. I bet if he does and plays decently hell get 20-30 minutes a game. Depending on who are other center is next year
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 16, 2012 9:59 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
okafor has 2 yrs remaining on his deal
and for a high price. getting him now would essentially void our chances of landing anyone worthwhile in 2012 free agency.
then again, getting to the WCF would be awesome, but not guaranteed.
someone like gortat otoh, would mitigate that risk of shutting down 2012 FA completely (< 8mil salary), while still giving us a big presence down low.
PHILLY!
2012 free agency is not a garaunteed thing either
it seems like the big name free agents do not want to come here.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 5:40 PM PST up reply actions
agreed, I don't see anyone coming here
except, I’ll hold out a little hope that we could talk Deron Williams into making his way out here, though his play is no longer that of a top 3 PG.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 6:01 PM PST up reply actions
Agree on Waiting
I think Okafor would be had at the same price in the off season as he could be had for now. I like the idea of holding off on any trades that would hurt our flexibility this off season and beyond.
Like ‘thankyourforblaze’ I am holding onto the hint of hope that we could land Deron Williams. If market size doesn’t matter to him, I think we could have a shot. D-Will and Wes seem to be good friends still and he has the Dallas connection with LaMarcus, so who knows.
The only reason Williams is not performing well
Is because he is playing with arguably the worst starting lineup in the NBA
if not the worse,
then definitely my least favorite, though Charlotte, Washington, and Detroit are doing their hardest to move up the ‘awful’ ladder.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 17, 2012 12:09 AM PST up reply actions
An Emeka Okafor deal would be nice.
Something built around Marcus Camby, a young project like Elliot Williams, the draft rights to Joel Freeland and Victor Claver, and some cash considerations might just do it. Yet, anything more than that wouldn’t be worth the cost of taking on the added salary for the next two seasons.
"I Am Mine"
New Orleans/Okla City???!!!?!1111?
That’s where the SportsNation box score thinks the hornets come from.
:/
Honor Alaa Abdelnaby.
First in the NBA. At least alphabetically
Batum should be sixth man
We need a real backup point guard and a starting one that can play starter’s minutes. Then Give Batum max minutes as sixth man at the 2/3/4, whereever you can. And forget Crawford he’s always worse than Mathews and clearly out of position at the point.
I’d be for trading Gerald OR Nic for a big man. Aldridge can’t dominate properly without some real help in the middle.
no doubt
at what point did they come up with the idea to make Batum 7th man behind Jamal Crawford? If anything, Batum should start, or atleast he should be our 1st option off the bench, he earned it, Jamal has hardly even been here.
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 16, 2012 5:43 PM PST up reply actions
Crawford, for all his ills, has been better than Felton
Crazy, huh?
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2012 8:20 PM PST up reply actions
i love diaw's game
and think he’d be perfect at center for us. he’s supposedly available now.
if only we had some mid priced mediocre contracts that we could trade. i’d trade marcus for him, but that likely won’t fly with nate.
PHILLY!
here we go
trade camby, nolan, and a pick for diaw and augustin.
then trade felton and gerald to PHX for nash and gortat.
then we’ve got: nash/wes/nic/aldridge/gortat with dj, crawford, and diaw off the bench.
nash got diaw his huge contract, and knows how to play with pretty much everyone. and gortat would be a nice center upgrade from camby, and dj would be our PGotF.
PHILLY!
Phoenix isn't trading Gortat for anything less than a package involving Rondo.
Portland should’ve moved in on Gortat when Orlando put him on the market, but alas.
"I Am Mine"
yup. why would PHX send out their second best player, as he's under 30
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 6:03 PM PST up reply actions
To add to that, a trade of Boris Diaw to Atlanta for Kirk Hinrich and a 2012 second-round pick fits.
1. Atlanta badly needs a frontcourt fill-in after Al Horford went down with injury.
2. Charlotte reportedly wants to move Boris Diaw simply ‘cause of his poor work ethic.
3. With Kirk Hinrich injured, Jeff Teague has proven himself to be a viable starting 1 in the NBA.
4. Since Diaw and Hinrich are both expirings earning a similar salary, it’s an even swap financially.
"I Am Mine"
I'm sort of irregular around here, is there enough gnashing about LA's minutes?
I’m quite worried about it.
Yes, I know Camby’s hurt. But I’m not convinced Nate isn’t going to murder our star.
volatilelyle.com
same problem as last year
and won’t likely be fixed until we get a quality starting center who can eat up lots of minutes
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 16, 2012 6:05 PM PST up reply actions
same prob for several years...his minutes need to be pro-actively guarded in every gam
and they just aren’t..usta make me crazy watching him and roy still on the court for every possession “down to the wire” in 15, 20 pt games…don’t watch much anymore, but Nate never seemed to give his full team a chance to play…way to fear based for me…
this space for rent
Thanks for the reference to Dr. King
And his letter from Birmingham Jail doesn’t take that long too read. But for those who don’t have time for the whole letter (linked below) here’s the takeaway:
In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
"Tom Lawson McCall, Governor or Oregon, invites you to visit . . . Washington, Idaho, Nevada, or Afghanistan." --Pair of bumper stickers on our baby blue 1966 Plymouth Fury III when I was growing up in Portland, BC (Before Championship).
I slept through the game, probably good thing..
OSU '06
GForce Crash Wallace FTW!
by TyboOSU on Jan 16, 2012 6:09 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Funny
Game ball goes to batum the only blazer with a negative +/- with -9.
Personally aldridge did what he needed to (otter than settle for some jumpers vs the paint).
by comptoncory on Jan 16, 2012 6:17 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Some strong moves from LMA in the paint too
and some pretty solid rebounds. He tipped 3 or 4 to Nico and a couple other guys…very annoying. Once again, he seems more aggressive playing at the 5.
It forces me to give ESPN more traffic. It sucks.
"There is nothing shrewd about running a red light and later finding out it kept you from being hit by an asteroid." - philofthenorth
by KeepItCopacetic on Jan 16, 2012 6:27 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed
Single game +/- is nearly useless, as we go over at some point every season. But SBN might be willing to put it in if enough folks asked for it.
—Dave
Not completely useless, though
It tells us that Batum has been out there making some bad units look better than they are…(maybe that is bad – bad like taking a painkiller before going to see a doctor to find out what hurts and why)….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 16, 2012 8:25 PM PST up reply actions
Nate needs to give Nolan a shot at backup PG
bring Jamal in at the 2. This nonsense of Jamal running the PG is a major issue in terms of offensive flow.
!!!o o!!!
OMG I just jizzed in my France
OMGrandpa
Nolan has not looked very good.
I was really optimistic about Nolan but what I’ve seen so far hasn’t really got me terribly excited. He seems to me like he’s been looking for his own shot too much… or maybe he’s having trouble finding clean passing lanes and is feeling forced to take shots. It’s way, WAY to early to discount Nolan’s ability to be a good backup PG, but he hasn’t exploited the opportunities he’s been given so far.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 16, 2012 11:14 PM PST up reply actions
yeah, I'm a little surprised
by the looking-for-his-shot-first mentality that Nolan has so far had.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 17, 2012 12:13 AM PST up reply actions
Nate works the dichotomy that you have to prove yourself on the floor
without giving any floor time to make your mistakes and grow…So Nolan will sit and watch and expect to improve without playing…which rarely if ever happens in my experience
this space for rent
Wishing Josh McRoberts was a Blazer
Guy is a stud. Smart and hard working.
How funny is it that Nate the dictator...
coach that doesn’t tolerate turnovers and bad shot selection is now coaching two guards that can turn the ball over almost four times more than the number of shots they actually made?
People crying that Nate doesn’t give guys any leash are now either going nuts because Nate is letting Jamal/Ray shoot too much or freaking out because he is somehow destroying their fragile mental state and causing them to make errors. Their scared they are going to get benched lol.
Nate McMillan is like some Sith Lord with battle meditation except he’s using it on the wrong team.
I feel like Nate does not really know how to coach a fast tempo game
Sometimes it looks like the Blazers are chickens with their heads cut off
Getting Okafor would make the Blazers substantially better going forward
Considering the state of the Hornets franchise I would guess that a simple Camby’s expiring for Okafor would work. Throw in some cash maybe.
#7
A lil off topic, but i can't stand Dwight Jaynes
He was on the MSP this morning talking nothing but negative about wallace, and then turning around and saying batum is the 2nd best player on the team. Batum has had a few nice games, but to say hes better then wallace right now is a joke… I don’t know how dwight has a job, the guy is a joke.
I just can't believe he is still hired though with the opinions he makes
Plus half the stories he “breaks” i swear end up following through. He said today he doesn’t think theres any way batum comes to an agreement before the jan deadline, which actually gave me some hope that they will come to terms.
The other thing is he often comes across to me as agenda driven. Not sure if its his own agenda or someone else is giving it to him, but some of his stances seem so far fetched that it seems the only reason is a deeper agenda. And i know many sports writers out are like that, and i dislike most of them also.

by 

































