Game 13 Preview: Portland Trail Blazers versus New Orleans Hornets
Game Time: 12:00 p.m. Pacific TV: CSNNW
A recent ESPN hyperlink headline dubbed the New Orleans Hornets as "hapless". It's cruel, perhaps a tad overstated, but generally accurate, as their 3-9 record shows. 80% of New Orleans' hap left with Chris Paul and David West. 19% more went into street clothes when Eric Gordon--the main return in the Paul trade--went down with a knee injury. If ESPN wants to round down approximately 1% hap to "hapless", I guess that's their prerogative.
Right now the Hornets' eye-opener is former Blazer combo-guard Jarrett Jack. He's starting at point, averaging 14 points and 8 assists, the latter nearly double his career average. The Hornets need a decent point guard because they're not set up to dump the offense to any single player and watch it run. Alongside Jack stand shooting guard Marco Belinelli (marginal at anything besides shooting threes), forward DaJuan Summers (filling in for the injured Trevor Ariza), and a couple of centers: Chris Kaman and Emeka Okafor. All of these players have defined strengths, about what you'd expect...rebounding and interior play from Okafor, a little more range and rebounding from Kaman, smart shots from Summers. But all are in the "pretty good" camp instead of great. Well, except Belinelli. He's not even pretty good.
As you might expect with injuries carving the heart out of the lineup New Orleans' bench isn't strong right now. Veteran forward Carl Landry leads the bunch. After than we're talking Al-Farouq Aminu and Greivis Vasquez...the latter of whom sounds like he should have been a character on Battlestar Galactica and thus is in the running for the Coolest Name in the League award. Sadly production doesn't live up to syllabic fortitude, as the Hornets field players who would make most teams say, "Maybe we'll take a chance on this guy." Right now New Orleans actually has to depend on them instead of taking chances.
The Hornets' two wins came when they were at full strength during the first two games of the season. Since then they're 1-9 against a host of good opponents. If the Blazers can play like a good team today, they should have no trouble.
New Orleans' main trouble is a severe lack of scoring power. They've topped 94 points only once in their last 10, that against the semi-permissive Memphis Grizzlies...and they still lost. I like Jarrett Jack, but when he's your leading scorer you're not fielding much firepower. They play slow, score few fast break points, attempt few three-pointers, draw few foul shots. The only thing they do is score in the lane. In fact points in the paint account for 47% of their overall scoring average. That's a rate comparable to the league's leading point producing teams, exceeding them if you factor out fast break opportunities. In other words, this may be the most lane-dependent halfcourt offense in the league. Their abysmal production shows how bad they are at everything else.
On the other end of the court the Hornets are decent at defending the paint and perimeter both. Their big weakness is stopping the break. If you can raise the tempo on them they're done. They prevent this through excellent rebounding on both ends. They do commit turnovers.
The profile here is pretty clear. The Blazers want to pressure Jarrett Jack and anybody else who handles the ball to see if they'll cough it up or rush a bad shot or pass. Failing that the Blazers need to remember that this is a one-pass-to-the-interior offense. The Hornets want to score inside and if they're not chucking shots with Jack and Belinelli they're going to depend on Kaman, Landry, and Okafor. As long as you are able to recover to Belinelli you can simply swarm the ball wherever it goes. If Jack gets it to a big guy, double that big guy. He's the only guy they want scoring it.
The danger points for Portland are that same interior scoring plus rebounding and pace. The Blazers are thin on the inside even with Camby defending. If he's not playing both Okafor and Kaman become issues. If the New Orleans' bigs can draw a couple early fouls on their Portland counterparts where will the Blazers go for help? Ditto in the rebounding department. The Hornets don't fast break but an offensive rebound put-back has nearly the same effect. Easy twos are easy twos. Plus if the Blazers can't rebound and get the run going then they fall prey to the New Orleans percentage defense. Minus offensive rebounds of their own it's hard to see where the Blazers could get easy scores. That would leave them in the same struggle for points as the Hornets. From there it's anybody's game.
It's likely Portland will have to run small lineups during the course of this game. When that happens they need to swarm and run. Take advantage of the Hornets being slower so their size doesn't tell. The success of those smaller lineups may be the difference in this contest.
See the New Orleans view over at At The Hive.
Enter the Jersey Contest form for this game here. Don't forget the early noon start.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hornets should feel too down.
It was inevitable and they have trading pieces and two likely high first rounders in a deep draft.
Rebuilding is rough, but if you want to start anew that’s a great start.
If the Blazers don’t nab this one it might be time (if it wasn’t already) to start thinking about rebuilding themselves.
It's just that
besides D Rose, no young draft pick has carried a team to any significance in the last several years. I know Kevin Love, Steph Curry, John Wall, and Jimmer are going to sell tickets, but ‘Nawlins was building a team that could advance in the playoffs. Chris Paul was a special player, and like B Roy in Portland, it’s not likely that franchise will get another in quite some time. Now they’ll most likely be a team that, hopefully, sells tickets. The NBA is so damn cruel that way.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 15, 2012 9:21 PM PST up reply actions
And D Rose got drafted by a huge-market team
Which is why he isn’t pulling a Dwight Howard. Oh, well . . . at least this is a long stretch of very winnable games for Portland, which means we can temporarily forget about the inevitable playoff crushing.
Incidentally the Hornets’ nickname is idiotic. Utah promised to give the “Jazz” moniker back if NO ever got another team, then welshed when they did. So now we have the Utah “Jazz,” as apropo a label as the LA “Lakers,” Houston “Rockets,” or, for that matter, Detroit “Pistons.”
Steve Goodman lives.
The league could fix this pretty easily:
revenue share and let teams re-sign their draft picks without penalty to the luxury tax.
You could just pay the player as much as you want, and make it work via revenue sharing.
But who am I kidding. That would require the league to actually learn how to market itself, which is as far fetched as a pair of slippers in Lassy’s frost-bitten mouth.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 15, 2012 9:33 PM PST up reply actions
PISTONS fits Detroit fairly well...GM, Ford...I think they still make some cars there don't they?
And I think there are rocket launchings from Houston aren’t there? Houston we have a problem…?
Agree with the Jazz being Utah’s name…ridiculous…and Lakers…also stupid. But Jazz in Utah???? Guess they can’t really name the team the Utah Choir though can they?
by Natsthecat on Jan 15, 2012 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Houston
is home of the Johnson Space Center where they train Astronauts and where mission control is. No Rockets are launched there though.
Actually...
Houston started out in the league as the San Diego Rockets and were so named because of the Atlas rocket program. The name just happened to be one of the rare examples where relevancy was maintained after the team relocated.
Houston and Detroit
actually make perfect sense. And everybody knows that the Lakers name moved with the team from Minneapolis where it made much more sense… just like the Jazz moved with the team from New Orleans. I guess ultimately it would make more sense to rebrand a franchise when they relocate but that rarely seems to happen.
Chicago had pieces there before Rose showed up.
Remember just two years prior to Rose being drafted people were touting the Bulls as a contender in the East. They also were able to sign a big free agent in Boozer. Had they started from scratch we wouldn’t be talking about the Bulls right now as title contenders.
You have to go through tough periods unless you’re LA. Every team in the league some way some how has to rebuild and it’s never a pretty transition.
Hapless they may be
but they still have clear advantages at point and center.
Go figure…
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 15, 2012 9:18 PM PST reply actions
Dont forget coaching
I’m pretty sure Monty would go right at Dalembert with 5 fouls in the 4th
"Per John Hollingers twitter - Over the final 12:45 of today's game, Brandon Roy's PER was 84.98" GM 4 vs Mavs
you mean they have a (n operational{in the case of center}) starting point and center ?
^ crabby ^
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Hope Batoom gets more burn
Especially since we’ll need all the rebounding we can get. Is it time to move Batum to the starting 2-guard spot and have Wes-Money coming off the bench?
Batum has to earn that first
One good game doesn’t put you in the starting line. I don’t get why everyone is calling for this. Wes$ has played better, why should he lose his starting spot? Only way this makes sense is if its just because of the long road trip, not a permanent move.
yeah, it doesn't matter who is 'starter'
really the minutes is the big thing, Nic has shown some ‘good things’, and should get more time, while other guys get less, depending on the situation. This exhausting schedule demands utilizing all the energy going to waste on the bench. Yes, rooks will make mistakes, but so will worn out starters.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
104-88 Rip city.
OSU '06
GForce Crash Wallace FTW!
by TyboOSU on Jan 15, 2012 10:00 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Martin Luther King day - in New Orleans.
Post Office closed.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
I wouldn't mind spending MLK day in New Orleans, at a ball game...
I gotta work though. Traffic sure is good right now!
but it's not MLK 'in New Orleans' here ...
somehow I think there is a difference, could be wrong tho…..
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
seems like we should win this one,
but the Blazers are such nice guys. They just hate to stomp on a team when it is down.
But the 3 game losing streak is ugly. Mabe they will pull it out.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
maybe Nate can reciprocate,
and trade teams with Monty ?
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Despite their lack of overall talent
Their advantage inside and on the boards, particularly without Camby, is worrisome. That combined with some cold Portland shooting could keep them in this game long enough for someone to get hot and maybe steal this one.
Best case scenario is an unsatisfying win that still doesn't show where this team is headed. What can you take away from beating the
Hornets? Probably nothing. I mean one team has to win, the game can’t end in a tie.
Best case scenario
is its a 20 point blow out and Elliot Williams gets to play a good 15 minutes.
Off topic
Do you think we will will fan night next week against the Grizz? Our biggest competition is the Heat vs Cavs they have to be over it by now right? plz?
i think he's talking about the NBA TV tuesday game
Where fans vote for which game gets played…but no. Portland would only get picked if they were playing the Heat or Lakers.
Interesting thought - what if we had kept Jack?
I know he has flaws to his game, but he would have had several years of experience running the offense- which would make him somewhat equivalent to either Miller or Felton.
Plus we wouldn’t have gone through the whole series of failed point guard experiments, starting with Bayless. This should have provided us with a few more quality bigs by now. And quality bigs is what this team really needs.
Instead we have a bunch of old bigs with only 1 quality big (Aldridge) – and a new bunch of point guard experiments that are giving us a poor return on investment.
For fun there ralphzillo,
start the failed guard experiment with Telfair, and go to EW/AJ. It hurst my brain at this point. Not saying Jack is the answer, but the pattern is riduculous.
But be careful, some smart Blazer fan will accuse you of being a laker fan around here.
There were young bigs available in those drafts too. Greg is not producing, 4 years later. All I’m saying, same plan , different year. It isnt working.
Go Blazers !!
just win baby !
If you were a true blazer fan
you would know our most recent PG pickup was Nolan Smith…GOSH! are you a Laker fan or something? Haha just kidding of course.
I am concerned ...
that the player taking the second most attempts behind LMA at 12.0 per is J. Crawford who is shooting a whopping 34.7% from the field and 30.0% from 3pt range. I know he is a chucker and supposed “great value” at his salary but that is simply awful! Nic is shooting 42.5% and 48.7% from 3pt. He needs to get some of Crawford’s 2 guard minutes and fast.
Blazers should run run run
I think Nate will have them flying around the court, wearing the Hornets down, and Portland will dominate. I am hoping this will jumpstart the Blazers, and they will go on a major run. I don’t get all of the pessimism about, and the lack of comments about, the Blazers, on a Blazers blog. It was Cinderella Story, when they lead the West to start the season. Now, nobody cares about them, or believes in the team, apparently. C’mon, guys…They look very good to this Blazer fan. I think that Nate finally has some speed to work with, which is actually his preferred mode of play. He knows how to use speed. This team is going to shock the world. IF no major knee injuries don’t happen. Fingers crossed on that one.
you are right in that the emotional swings are rather extreme
and unwarranted. The ‘wear ’em down’ plan sounds good, except the Blazers get worn down too.
It seems we just ‘have to’ use the bench to survive. Necesity seems the mother of invention with Nate.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Batum
Nic needs more minutes, I agree. Crawford will pay dividends, eventually. For now, though, Batum is pretty hot, so he needs more PT. Sure wish Camby were healthy today. They rely on him so much this season. Gotta get some good young bigs, one of these years. Still, I think Portland will be better than most people here think, come playoffs. For a change, I’m looking forward to the post-season.
At the Hive is saying Jack is better than Felton
What does everyone here think of that?
"When the love is mutal, the hardest thing is to walk away." -Brandon Roy
They have "Jarret Jack > Raymond Felton"
"When the love is mutal, the hardest thing is to walk away." -Brandon Roy
In some ways, probably
but Felton is a more proven point guard for sure and also has strengths that Jack doesn’t.
—Dave
maybe the short list would be
“worse than” at what ?
^ more crabby ^
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.

by 

































