Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Game 12 Preview: Portland Trail Blazers vs. Houston Rockets

Game Time: 5:00 p.m. TV: CSNNW

Update: The Blazers report on Twitter that Kurt Thomas will start at center in place of Marcus Camby rather than shifting forward Nicolas Batum into the starting lineup.

And here we go...again! Out of San Antonio and into Houston. Two years ago that would have been out of the frying pan and into the fire for the Trail Blazers. The Rockets aren't quite what they once were, however. The Trail Blazers might or might not be, but it's pretty certain they're closer to their once-quite-respectable level than Houston is currently.

That's not to say the Rockets are patsies. Kevin Martin, Luis Scola, Kyle Lowry...there's talent here. But we're used to Martin at 22-23 ppg and he's at 17 so far this year, victim of a significant drop in field goal percentage and a precipitous drop in three-point percentage (38% to 32%, and he shoots plenty of them). Scola is familiar to Portland fans as a Blazer-killer but his production is slightly off too. Lowry is the only guy motoring along as ever, having overcome a foot injury to do so. He and fellow point guard Goran Dragic are the rocks of this lineup so far. Another familiar name, center Samuel Delambert, split minutes with Jordan Hill at center. Both can rebound and hit shots in their low block wheelhouse. Delambert, of course, can block shots as well. Rookie utility man Chandler Parsons starts at small forward with utility man Chase Budinger behind him. The Rockets also bring the multi-talented Courtney Lee off the bench, though he's currently nursing a calf injury.

Collectively this isn't a bad lineup, it's just hard to say where it's a particularly good lineup if Martin and Scola aren't playing out of their minds. You like every player for different reasons, but there's no pop, no driving force, and not enough cohesion to power the team.

Houston sports an adequate offense. They spread around the ball, scoring from all angles. They're average in the paint, slightly better on the break but nothing to write home about. Their most distinctive feature is their willingness to take threes. They attempt over 21 per game, putting them in the upper echelon of the not-entirely-crazy teams in the league in that department. They only connect at an average rate, so judge for yourself whether the three-fest is a good or bad thing. Everybody but Scola and the centers will shoot them. Lowry, Dragic, and small forward Terrence Williams are the guys to fear actually connecting. They need those extra points too, as they're dead last in the league in drawing foul shots, and that's by a mile. Miami, the leagues #1 free throwers, are just a couple of attempts per game shy of doubling Houston's attempts.

Houston is OK on the boards, OK with shot blocking. They neither commit nor force many turnovers.

Defense finds the Rockets falling apart at the seams, however. They have one of the least efficient defenses in the league, largely because they allow a crap-ton (scientific measurement there) of points in the paint. While their perimeter players get around to stop jump shots, those inside attempts for the opponent make the overall opposing shooting percentage blossom. Houston is 27th in the league in field goal percentage allowed.

The task for the Blazers seems simple. Portland is more talented, playing better, and has a more seamless weave than do the Rockets. Keep Kevin Martin in his funk, get out to cover perimeter shooters (a strength so far), and rebound the ball and all should be well on the defensive end. All of that is straight out of Portland's natural profile. The Rockets don't have the kind of inside threat to make the Blazers choose who they'll let free. The Blazers can cover everybody and should do it well.

The offensive end is a little more shaky...not in theory but in execution. The Rockets defend jump shooters and not inside shots. The Blazers shoot jumpers well but not inside shots. Portland has to summon the energy, will, and enough execution to make their offense look easier than it normally does. The Blazers need to drive the lane, post Aldridge deep, do anything necessary to avoid a jump-shooting duel. This should be doable. On paper the problems seem few.

There's always the old bugaboo of being on the road and playing the second game in two nights, though. If the Blazers come in tired or take shortcuts on either end the Rockets definitely have enough talent to beat them. Portland can't just show up tonight. They have to show up to win.

Complicating things is the injury situation of Marcus Camby. The Blazers can manufacture good minutes without him but the hole in their middle was already significant. Now it's a gaping maw. Portland needs a big man to step up and fill time.

Still, this is one of the few games so far where you can say the outcome is in Portland's control. The Blazers will either take this game or give it away. Let's see how they respond.

Get the Houston story at The Dream Shake. It's one heck of a blog.

Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.

--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)

Comment 71 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If it was simply on the road or just a back-to-back at home, I'd go with Portland.

A back-to-back on the road, however, is a double whammy. Not good, not good at all.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Jan 14, 2012 1:14 AM PST reply actions  

Normally, I would agree with you.

Ummm….No I wouldn’t.

But – I do this time. No-surprise ambush a likely outcome.

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 14, 2012 3:17 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm kind of tired of the Blazers being this whimpy team that seems to be very lazy at times.

The least bit of defense completely takes them out of their game…Is it that Nate needs to play more of the bench? Are other teams’ main rotational players playing as many minutes? How many minutes are Derrick Rose and the other main Bulls’ starters playing? Will have to check into this.
The Blazers HAVE been playing teams that are above 500 for the most part.

by Natsthecat on Jan 14, 2012 5:26 AM PST up reply actions  

I think our offensive strategy is shallow and undefined.

We have some talent, but it’s not organized into a cohesive fighting force. Nate has been able to coast on BRoy’s one-on-one game; now we’re ess-oh-ell in the half court, aside from LaMarcus. Nate needs to start from scratch, list all of our assets, and design an offense that utilizes what we have.

Wes, Nic, and Ray can shoot 40% from the 3 point line. LMA should be positioned to work in tandem with outside shooters. Ray and Jamal should be able to drive to the hole and pass to Crash or Nic, cutting in from the weak side or baseline. I wanna see people in position for offensive rebounds and reset the offense if they can’t make their layups. Our gnarly defense creates many transition opportunities, but our half court offense needs a playbook. Scrappy defense is good… scrappy offense is not.

After we get that straightened out, we need a leader who can pinpoint our opponents weaknesses, in real time. When LA is shooting 60% against Splitter or Chris Paul has 4 fouls, someone on the floor needs to be identifying that weakness and exploiting it. I think Nate is responsible for ensuring that all these things happen… but half the time, he can’t even make his players show up for tip off.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 8:59 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Only in defense of last night, LMA was in foul trouble and was sitting when Splitter went on a tear,

No one else could punish Splitter or hit shots, so he just stayed back and got rebounds with both Camby and LMA out of the game.

hg

by BBK on Jan 14, 2012 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, LaMarcus had to sit for a while.

We need a gameplan that makes use of our other scorers strongpoints instead of their weaknesses.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Somehow I doubt that Nate sits with his fellow coaches and says

“Guys, I think we need to use our players weaknesses to attack the other team, they’ll never see it coming!!!”

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Jan 14, 2012 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

The idea that McMillan isn't so good at designing offenses to player strengths isn't outlandish

We have two possibilities to explain offensive issues:

1) Scheme is unable to get the right shots for the right players
2) Wrong players to make the shots even if they get them

It is conceivable that both issues are at play for the Blazers – especially with regards to Felton. Not that Felton is the wrong guy – but he isn’t hitting shots we expect him to hit. Crawford is actually performing exactly as we expect (shooting the Blazers into and out of games – for an overall (slightly) net positive impact).

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 14, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, the team's problems on offense are mostly related to personnel. No head ...

coach can make Jamal Crawford anything more than an inefficient chucker who’s out to get his own shots. No head coach can make Raymond Felton stop being an out of shape, mistake-prone point guard. No head coach can get Wesley Matthews and Nic Batum to automatically develop good handles.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Jan 14, 2012 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I had actually hoped to test the "head coach" culpability idea

Wanted to use nba.com’s hotspots to compare San Antonio shot selection vs. Blazer shot selection.

Unfortunately, the data proved unreliable. If we had access to something similar – shot selection/% based on location (not distance) of shot – we could see if Popovich is better at getting players shots that they can make.

However, the only real Achilles heal for the Blazers this season is Felton/Crawford, and on occasion, Wallace (too many low % threes)….some of that is personnel – some of it is coaching (control, rather than teaching)…

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 14, 2012 3:26 PM PST up reply actions  

You’ve pointed out weaknesses in Cupcake, Craw, Wes, and Nic… I think any head coach should be able to identify those same weaknesses and work around them. Jamal is not as good at shooting as Matthews or Batum, but he’s better at dribbling around the court. Having Jamal pass to Matthew and Batum seems logical, and I can’t think of any reason for Nate not to do whatever it takes to make that happen.

Does it violate the CBA to get Fatty on the treadmill and weigh him in every week? Is it inconceivable that Nate suspend Craw if he keeps chucking? I think Nate has the ultimate responsibility to maximize what he’s getting from his personnel. The season is still young, but I think it’s time to make some corrections.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but allowing something to continue has the same effect as doing it intentionally.

I believe Nate has a tendency to allow his guards to play by instinct, instead of dictating to them. But when Jamal is going 2/11, that’s a weakness… and we’ve seen it more than once. I think Jamal has more value driving towards the basket, because he obviously isn’t skilled at shot selection.

Coach needs to ensure that his guys stop trying to do things they’re not good at. It’s not just Jamal. Wallace has been shooting outside his range also, and his strength appears to be scoring in the post or at the rim. Only our best shooters should be taking outside shots.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Teams have a way of stepping up for a game or two after losing a key player with injury.

They have a good chance of winning tonight.

"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 14, 2012 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Teams are going to come with it when they play the Blazers

because of the little hype were getting early in the season, so the Blazers should expect that opposing player will be playing there best.

by AP_18 on Jan 14, 2012 1:28 AM PST reply actions  

I think it would be

really cool if the Blazers would play at

their
best.

by Natsthecat on Jan 14, 2012 5:31 AM PST up reply actions  

correcting others spelling on a sports blog

Is pretty ocd nats.

Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje, Vladimir Stepania, Ha(ha you suck) Seung Jin, Travis Diener and Erick Barkley

by blazethenugs on Jan 14, 2012 9:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I know less than half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

by haildablazer on Jan 14, 2012 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

it is but that's not what I was doing!!

I meant to Italicize the word “their” and instead hit the quote button!!!

by Natsthecat on Jan 14, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

My Grammer was German

but she wasn’t a Nazi

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Jan 14, 2012 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

yea dan dickauer is definetly key

To our teams 3pt shooting success. Hahahahahahaha.

Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje, Vladimir Stepania, Ha(ha you suck) Seung Jin, Travis Diener and Erick Barkley

by blazethenugs on Jan 14, 2012 9:15 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

LOL !!

off the bench cold and nails 3’s , so no one notices the gapping hole in the middle !!
GGRRRRRRRRRRRR, Dalembert and Hill tonight. Are you kidding me ??

just win baby !

by FrenchieFan on Jan 14, 2012 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Who starts?

Put Kurt Thomas in the middle or move LMA to C and play the smaller lineup with Batum?

by SlowCarCrash on Jan 14, 2012 5:28 AM PST reply actions  

last night Nate said he was thinking of starting Batum.

I am pretty sure when he did this last year…but not positive..so please correct me if I am wrong..that Batum was designated as the center. Even though..really he wasn’t.

by Natsthecat on Jan 14, 2012 5:36 AM PST up reply actions  

game start at the same time as DEN vs NE

tebow v brady.

i hate football. but even i will watch that game simultaneously.

PHILLY!

by CleBlazer on Jan 14, 2012 6:45 AM PST reply actions  

Good preview
But we’re used to Martin at 22-23 ppg and he’s at 17 so far this year, victim of a significant drop in field goal percentage and a precipitous drop in three-point percentage (38% to 32%, and he shoots plenty of them)

The biggest issue for Martin this season (and certainly the biggest issue on offense for the Rockets as a whole) is an enormous drop in free throws. You mention this, but it doesn’t quite get at how strange and enormous the shift has been for the Rockets.

Last year they had something like the 7th-best free throw-drawing offense in the league (looking at it on a per-shot basis). This year, they have the worst free throw-drawing offense in league history since the invention of the shot clock.

It’s very bizarre. The conspiracy-minded part of me wants to blame the League Office for directing the refs to stop calling so many fouls on Kevin Martin. The less-conspiracy minded part of me blames the shift from the Adelman offense: fewer guys are cutting to the basket, more are just waiting for Lowry to create something for them.

by Only_A_Lad on Jan 14, 2012 7:29 AM PST reply actions  

At this point, anything Crawford does or does not do is Nate's fault.

If Jamal is disobeying his coach, he needs to be suspended for a game.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 9:05 AM PST up reply actions  

does not compute

this is a major overreaction and i’m not even sure it’s anywhere near accurate

by permaswoon on Jan 14, 2012 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Either Jamal is doing what Nate wants him to do, or he's not.

In both cases, it’s not working — thus Nate is responsible for doing whatever is necessary to fix it.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope Nate does more than make post game comments.

At least that’s evidence that he is not satisfied with what’s going on. I’ll be satisfied when I see corrections being made.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

well, you aren’t going to suspend a guy who’s only ability is shooting the ball because he’s been shooting the ball. it’s just too bad that half the time, they are bad shots, but that’s his game. the message that i’ve been understanding from his and nate’s comments is that the team wants him to play his game and there are times when that has worked. crawford needs to get more time to be comfortable on this team, with these players and if he doesn’t know what else to do, he’s going to shoot it. surprise! i’m not going to blame nate because crawford is one of the better players he has to work with. this roster has talent, but not so much where you can suspend a guy for taking 11 shots and trying to do something while everyone else does an equal amount of nothing positive. that’s what doesn’t make sense.

by permaswoon on Jan 14, 2012 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes!

I only said that Jamal should be suspended if he is shooting in spite of Nate’s wishes. If Nate is satisfied with Craw’s shot selection… no wonder we are losing.

I think Jamal has more to offer than simply shooting at random. It’s Nate’s job to get the best out of his guys.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 2:36 PM PST up reply actions  

You should probably send Nate a letter explaining your view point

It won’t get there by this evening but it could really help for the remainder of the road trip

"What began as a credible protest against bank bailouts, crony capitalism and the like has, in large measure, been hijacked by crazies and criminals,"

by 92wastheyear on Jan 14, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I texted him last night

…still haven’t heard back from him…

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

How's this on Nate?

If anything, this is on management for signing Jamal Crawford.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Jan 14, 2012 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

What we know about Nate is that he is loyal almost to a fault

and will give a lot of rope to veterans who are “supposed” to be filling a specific role…

Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.

by blacknoiseNW on Jan 14, 2012 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

That's true.

If Nate is the one behind the signing of Jamal Crawford, then that’s on him.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Jan 14, 2012 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

crawford and felton are sieves on defense

They both get steals, but only because they overplay the passing lanes and consistently let the guard drive by them. Crawford is even worse than felton at p & r defense. Crawford is only doing one thing for us people, and that is score

Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje, Vladimir Stepania, Ha(ha you suck) Seung Jin, Travis Diener and Erick Barkley

by blazethenugs on Jan 14, 2012 9:13 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

This is starting to look like one of those nasty slides we had early last season

I seem to remember starting the season with brutalizing teams in the 4th quarter. Then we completely switched to not being able to close games and went on a 6 game slide or something. It feels like history is repeating itself.

Our offense is completely unorganized unless they commit to going inside out by running it through LMA in the post. He can’t play all 48 minutes though.

I’m guessing this all evens out deeper in the season but I think we had one of these little slides in our run for the playoffs too. It’s weird because it’s like these guys share a brain sometimes. Ray and Jamal come on board and suddenly they can’t shoot? Either our shooting coach completely sucks or their is some weird team chemistry side effect.

by poorwebguy on Jan 14, 2012 9:52 AM PST reply actions  

tension has a way of creeping up when guys are losing

Funny how the ball movement completely disappears and guys start trying to do things on their own. Would be nice if we could bounce back tonight.

by poorwebguy on Jan 14, 2012 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

this month is brutal

after just a casual look at the schedule when it came out, I mentioned if Portland could make it out of Jan somewhere near .500, they’d be doing well

and that assumed a healthy Camby and/or the return of Przy

Here’s a matchup to watch tonight, LMA when defended by Dalembert. Sammy gave LMA fits in the post, last year. If it happens again, the Blazer’s offense will be forced back outside

When reached 40+ years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by two4larue on Jan 14, 2012 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, yes. Been struggling from the 3 line?

Can’t get anything going inside?

The Blazers might just be the team you want to play.

I don’t expect much from the road team tonight. Camby doesn’t just help on defense, he spaces the floor with his ability to pass the ball from the high post area. Without him in there the Blazers are often either too clogged to run the offense through LMA or too spread out to get proper rebound position. Getting back in transition then doubling any and every Blazer who touches the ball is a pretty good formula for turning the Blazers into a perimeter team, which is not a game they are going to win very often.

/s

by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 9:59 AM PST reply actions  

I'm not expecting much

Rarely do these days, but it will be interesting to possibly see more of that Wallace, Aldridge, Batum front court… Just don’t think it’ll happen nearly enough for me to sit and watch the whole game.

by Doganpc on Jan 14, 2012 11:19 AM PST reply actions  

Its economics

I want to enjoy the time I spend away from work and after that Phoenix game… I’m pretty sold on who/what this team is and refuse to fall for that trap again (till next season when we won’t know who/what the team is again). Indeed, perhaps basketball isn’t my primary thing as there is still football to be had. I didn’t know being a diehard basketball fan was a requirement of participation here.

by Doganpc on Jan 14, 2012 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

A decent economic idea would be to record the games...

And then watch them later, if the Blazers win.

Then, you won’t suffer through a loss, and you can skip the commercials and halftime. That’s your best bang for the buck, right thar.

by manfredi on Jan 14, 2012 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

a lot of pessimism going on in here

last night was the first time i’ve been frustrated with crawford because it looked like he didn’t want to do anything but shoot. i’ve been genuinely happy with his contribution and i really haven’t felt like he was chucking up until then. i would also say that even though felton’s shaky play has actually been funny in that “oh my god, whyyyyyyy?” kind of way, i’ve been pretty happy with him too. those statements come with the caveat that i know both players can play better and i believe they will. andre miller’s numbers in denver are very comparable to felton’s. everyone forgets that these guys have played 10 games together. let this cake bake! and then we’ll see if we accidentally used rat poison instead of sugar.

by permaswoon on Jan 14, 2012 11:51 AM PST reply actions  

If they come out playing like the last two back-to-backs on the road, it's going to be really, really, really bad again.

You’ll be able to tell after the first few possessions. how useless the legs of these guys will be.

by CoryBauer on Jan 14, 2012 12:13 PM PST reply actions  

The thing that sticks out to me about this team

is Kyle Lowry. As Dave mentioned:
Lowry is the only guy motoring along as ever, having overcome a foot injury to do so. He and fellow point guard Goran Dragic are the rocks of this lineup so far.
He is not only motoring along as ever but he’s been lights out this year. He is number one in PER ahead of Derrick Rose, Chris Paul, Lou Williams and Ty Lawson. He is getting 16 pts a game up from 10 career. He is averaging over 9 assists and almost 7 rebounds. He is up in FG%, 3pt% and up from 70% to 90% on his FTs. Seeing that we got killed by Chris Paul the first game and by Steve Nash and considering the way Felton is playing it looks like mission impossible. (notice I left and opening there)

by XBlazerfan on Jan 14, 2012 2:45 PM PST reply actions  

Lowry has taken "The Leap"

He started it at the end of last year, and not only has he continued, but he’s jumped into the elite tier of point guards in this early season. I thought even after last year that he had hit his ceiling, but he’s exceeded expectations by far.

Was too far to huck a beer at a Stro’s player as per bone’s request. Jess (girlfriend) said I was too far, I said challenge accepted, a security guard said guess again.-BD34
That is the reason I don't go to Battle Red Blog. I would be too rational and guys would flag my posts as spam.-batman713

by ak2themax on Jan 14, 2012 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Having read your preview

I noticed your bloggers are almost as pessimistic as us. Looks like they put together a pretty good team in fairly short order.

by XBlazerfan on Jan 14, 2012 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

After the Gasol no-trade and factoring in Yao’s departure, I don’t think too many of us had hopes. We’ve been the last team eliminated from the playoffs two years in a row, and it’s a weird limbo. Either you have to go all-in on some risky moves and try to give yourself a shot, or you “tank” and rebuild through the draft. Since the Rockets hadn’t been able (or successful) to perform the former, we kind of expected the latter.

Plus, with all the injuries and seeming injustices given to us over the last decade-plus, I think pessimism would be understood. However, I like to think of myself as cynical or realistic, though it certainly delves into pessimism from time-to-time.

Was too far to huck a beer at a Stro’s player as per bone’s request. Jess (girlfriend) said I was too far, I said challenge accepted, a security guard said guess again.-BD34
That is the reason I don't go to Battle Red Blog. I would be too rational and guys would flag my posts as spam.-batman713

by ak2themax on Jan 14, 2012 9:39 PM PST up reply actions  

good game

Its gonna be damn good. Stand strong blazers fans, theres not many of us. FOLLOW ME @johnterwilliger

by Johntwigs on Jan 14, 2012 4:05 PM PST via Android app reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm