Game 11 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 83, San Antonio Spurs 99
In a Nutshell
On a night when both teams get to find out what their lineups would look like without big men the Blazers get manhandled on the boards, in the paint, in every conceivable fashion. The traditional forced turnovers weren't nearly enough to compensate for San Antonio's pure shooting and the Blazers go down in flames.
Game Flow
The first quarter started out in magnificently pretty fashion with both teams playing to their strengths. The Blazers forced turnover after turnover on the Spurs, pilfering the rock and running to the other end for easy buckets. The Spurs, meanwhile, took advantage of Portland's gambling to set up high-percentage opportunities of their own. The result was a nearly-even contest with the Blazers posting 9 turnovers on San Antonio but the Spurs shooting 70% for the period. Maybe it wasn't a purist's delight, but it sure was fun to watch. Fun...like an idyllic lake shore scene at Camp Crystal Lake. Still waters reflect a beautiful sky on a calm evening when everyone is gathered to enjoy themselves, not knowing that something lurks beneath the waters of that lake. Something horrible...and it's angry...and it's coming for everyone 6'10" or taller. Gee-gee-gee...HA-HA-HAH. You shouldn't play games on Friday the 13th.
The first victim was Tim Duncan who looks sweet and innocent but was getting stripped more than a newlywed bride in this game. A couple minutes into the first quarter...what's that in the hockey mask? TWEET! TWEET! Two fouls and Duncan is gone. Then DeJuan Blair got caught smoking behind the craft shed. TWEET! TWEET! More fouls and Blair is gone. Portland takes advantage by aggressively driving the lane, Gerald Wallace and Raymond Felton coming strong in particular. LaMarcus Aldridge rips everybody in his path, scoring 14 in the period. At the end of one Portland leads 31-27.
Interlude: Tell me, folks, which you think more likely to falter first: Portland grabbing obnoxious numbers of steals or the Spurs excelling every time they do manage to run their offense?
The second quarter of this game belonged to Wesley Matthews. Still absent credible bigs, the Spurs had to run multiple men at the dominating Aldridge. That left Matthews open any way he cared to be. To his credit he did convert some drives along with the usual jumpers on his way to a dozen points in the period. With Aldridge in tune and Matthews playing a great second fiddle things looked rosy for the Blazers until...Marcus Camby! What are you doing down by the river with that girl? Yeah, I know she's hot but you should really think twice before...OH NO! MARCUS! LOOK OUT BEHIND YOU! IT'S...IT'S...it's too late. WHACK! Camby goes down and rolls an ankle. He's in the fetal position under the hoop and is carried off the court. X-rays would later turn out negative but he was out of this game and will be day-to-day for the next few. "That's a bummer!" said Aldridge as he cracked open a beer. Wait...cracked open a beer?!? LaMarcus! NOOOOOO! Tweet! Third foul. LMA sits. He'd pick up his fourth foul just 3:50 into the second half, meaning the Blazers would spend the two middle periods without either of their reliable bigs.
This left large swaths of Portland's second unit playing against San Antonio's second unit. San Antonio would win that battle throughout the second and third period. Despite Matthews' heroics the Spurs would lead 50-47 at the half. With no big guys available in the third and every Portland small guy save Raymond Felton (who was having such a bad game he should have been wearing the hockey mask) congenitally unable to dribble, that left the Blazers shooting long and contested jumpers. On the other end the turnovers had long since dried up. In fact the Blazers were committing more turnovers than they were forcing. Also, as it turns out and despite visual evidence to the contrary, Tiago Splitter is an innocent, sweet-faced, flaxen-haired virgin. We know this because the hockey mask guy left him alone completely. Since the Blazers were fielding a lineup in which reserve forward/center Kurt Thomas looked like a giant, Splitter had a heyday against whichever undersized opponent guarded him. He broke down the Blazers inside. Anybody who's seen the Blazers play this season knows what comes next. Portland had to over-compensate in chasing the threat, leaving the weak side open for drives and shots as well as the entire three-point arc unguarded. Portland's last gasp came from a couple of threes in the third period, enough to keep the game even heading into the fourth. But when Portland has to rely on the three to stay alive, you know they're in trouble.
That trouble came swiftly in the fourth with San Antonio hitting shots, running, and totally destroying the undersized, jump-shooting Blazers on the boards to take a lead they'd never relinquish. Not even Aldridge's return could buoy the team. The Spurs simply blew them away. Final score: 99-83, Spurs.
Take-Away Points
Aldridge, Matthews, and Wallace had fantastic individual games for the Blazers. The talent is there. But now we see how a small twist of fate--in this case the looming absence of Camby and with him any pretense to inside defense or rebounding--can totally throw Portland's chances against a decent team. The lack of ball-handling, interior scoring, and stops was pronounced tonight. We also saw that the strong parts of Portland's game are hard to bring out consistently while the weaknesses leak out fairly easily. This is the big worry for this year's incarnation of the Blazers.
People have complained in the past (mostly in hindsight) about Brandon Roy and the isolation offense as if it cost the team every time Roy went solo. Games like tonight show you that a team needs a guy who can take over a game and score when nothing else is going right. Felton, Matthews, Jamal Crawford...all have auditioned for that spot this season and failed badly. Brandon Roy gave this team a safety net that they just haven't replaced.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge was amazing in that first quarter and played strongly throughout the game. He kept to his strengths: jumpers, turn-arounds, and deeper posts. 12-21 shooting, 5-5 free throws, 29 points, 7 rebounds, 2 steals. He made Tim Duncan look like a slouchy statue.
Gerald Wallace did his best to pick up every piece of the puzzle the Blazers fumbled tonight. In the first half he stole the ball like a madman. In the second half he rebounded like a champ. He only went 4-11 on the night but frankly that's because the Blazers' impotent offense forced him into shots that aren't his strength. 12 points, 12 rebounds, 4 steals, 5 assists.
Wesley Matthews went 5-11 for that dozen points in the second quarter. He didn't score a single point outside of that period but we'll take it.
Marcus Camby played 13 minutes with 3 rebounds. He was defending well. Get back soon.
Outside of a few marvelously aggressive drives in the opening period Raymond Felton was on a different page--no, in a whole different book--from his teammates and possibly the game plan. When the offense started sputtering he tried to pick it up himself. That's always curious behavior from a point guard, more so when the point guard has been struggling on offense all season, even more so when the solution he chooses is the jumper, even more so when those jumpers just don't fall. Felton went 6-17 for 13 points. He had 5 steals. That part was excellent. His 7 assists were fine. But most of his brilliance came early and then it was just bad.
Jamal Crawford 2-11. No need to go over this again.
Nicolas Batum had 3 fouls in place of decent defense in 22 minutes. This wasn't a good night for him or any of the second unit guys.
Any bench contributions beyond this were modest.
(No) Fun With Numbers
- San Antonio 50 rebounds, Portland 36. SA 11-10 on offensive boards.
- Blazers force 18 steals and 23 total turnovers but end up committing 18 turnovers themselves. The offense just fell apart after a while.
- San Antonio hit more free throws (17) than the Blazers even attempted (14). Don't complain. The Blazers never got inside unless it was Aldridge or a fast break and both of those dried up somewhere in the second period, never to return.
- Speaking of...San Antonio 52 points in the paint. Yikes. (Portland had 34.)
- The Spurs also shot 51.4% to the Blazers' 40.5%. Not fair.
- Take away Aldridge's hoops and the Blazers shot 22-63, or around 35%.
Final Thoughts
The schedule shows no mercy. Houston tomorrow. Samuel Delambert and Luis Scola looked manageable before this game started. If the Blazers are without Camby they almost look intimidating...
Hear the other story of this game (with 93% less horror) at Pounding The Rock.
Here is a boxscore. Protective goggles are recommended.
Your Jersey Contest Scoreboard and form for tomorrow's game.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
128 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
lol... what a game huh? I was thinking that this game was a sure winner after one, but
we got “schooled” by Pops.
by mora2 on Jan 13, 2012 8:52 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I was in the other boat, sadly
Something had to give when the Blazers were only up 4 after playing their ideal quarter. Granted the Spurs weren’t going to shoot 71% but their shooting percentage wasn’t as likely to fall as far as the Blazers’ turnovers. When Camby went down that just sealed it. That sucked.
I love the Blazers’ ideal game but I also think their ideal game is fragile. They have to develop, or trade for, alternatives to what they already have.
—Dave
Develop a theme around existing players, or develop new players for the McMillan Ideal?
They have to develop, or trade for, alternatives to what they already have.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 14, 2012 12:53 AM PST up reply actions
-too funny
OH NO! MARCUS! LOOK OUT BEHIND YOU! IT’S…IT’S…it’s too late. WHACK! Camby goes down and rolls an ankle. He’s in the fetal position under the hoop and is carried off the court. X-rays would later turn out negative but he was out of this game and will be day-to-day for the next few. “That’s a bummer!” said Aldridge as he cracked open a beer. Wait…cracked open a beer?!? LaMarcus! NOOOOOO! Tweet!
by mora2 on Jan 13, 2012 8:55 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
espn...thats the Blazers for ya!!!
ESPN said it best with Camby going out and losing……thats the blazers for ya!!!
lets make that deal Larry , or Paul, Or Chad, Or Abu Fatimah, or whoever is calling the shots over there
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
He still has a house here.
We could use a F/C
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Jan 14, 2012 9:41 AM PST up reply actions
the man who doesn't run, just rolls around his ankles.
But the older you get (I know its only since last season, but still) the longer it takes to come back. I think by his 35th season he will probably have to sit out a season.
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
by SGT Lenny on Jan 13, 2012 10:12 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Hmmm... a 37 and a 39 center, why not
let’s take on another 37 year! This team needs attitude anyways.
what's Robert Parrish up to?
Or Sam Perkins.
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
by SGT Lenny on Jan 13, 2012 10:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
For the past 2 years, Brandon was inconsistent at best doing this.
Brandon Roy gave this team a safety net that they just haven’t replaced.
Do agree that the Blazers could use the earlier, non-injured version of Roy, quite a bit. Or they could use someone like Andre Miller…
Do think that if the Blazers had any time to practice..or if they would go deeper into their bench…maybe things would be different for players like Felton, Matthews and Crawford.
Miller
could at least dribble and finish in reasonable fashion. Portland just has NOBODY with both the dribble and shot control to get in dangerous scoring position. Crawford is the closest guy and right now he’s just as dangerous to his own team as the opponent. When everything goes right this doesn’t show as much but when something goes wrong and the Blazers need rescuing…forget it.
—Dave
Andre had the veteran 'overdrive' gear for emergencies,
When Ray, on the other hand, over-revs his ‘red-line’ and starts hitting the valves with pistons ‘n’ stuff, not pretty.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
*friggin finger!
-let’s just hope that tomorrow is a different story and this team that came out with passion and awed the media and even you Mr. John Holinger, will prove that they can compete and win on the road. So they lost one game out of the six that they are to play for this road trip. We can only hope that this team will not dwell on the past two horrible games.
We got the wrong Denver pg
Wish we had Lawson
by Sonic Phantom on Jan 13, 2012 9:24 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Lawson has had an awesome season so far. Felton looks like a third-stringer....
trying to prove himself.
Well Bandwagoneers!
You know it’s going to be a bad night when the enemy outscores the homeboys 50 to 41 in the comments sections for the pregame posts. Although their host outscored Dave 15 to 0. Dave must have dribbled off of Felton’s foot or visa versa.
Batum guarded Parker
… better than anyone else did. While Batum was on him in the second half, Parker was able to do exactly nothing. And unlike others, Batum does not pound the rock.
The times when he gets the ball, he better shoot it, because it certainly doesn’t get back to him, but he plays a team game when he doesn’t have an open shot or a lane, so the ball keeps moving. When he curls around an Aldridge screen, or makes a back cut, how many times will Crawford and Felton continue to not pass to him?
The guy got 7 shots against San Antonio and other chuckers weren’t hitting? His D was as good or better than others on the team. He communicates on D. He hustles. Dave, you missed it on this one.
Some in the media are getting it when noting that he, like Matthews and Aldridge, are more important to the future of the Blazers than Camby, Crawford and perhaps both Wallace and Felton. Getting 24 minutes a game and only playing D and a team game? Really?
"how many times will Crawford and Felton continue to not pass to him?"
This happens constantly, not only in this game.Batum to give a sign that he wants the ball, but to remains ignored by his teammates – that becomes usual view.
At the same time Felton is 6-17 – too many / unsuccessful / attempts.
McMillan kills Batum’s development.As well his confidence as a player.
Not so far this year
Last year, his numbers were virtually identical to Millers…
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 13, 2012 11:22 PM PST up reply actions
I'm still hoping he settles down
Erases some of my doubt. Watching him take terrible shots when he should be setting up the offense destroyed most of my hope though. That’s a very Bayless or AJ thing to do.
Lol
We have a better record than last year and felons stats are identical to what miller had all last year. Look at the big picture. Not individual games. Lol. I’ll take 7/1 assist to TO any night. Dave missed the boat on this recap. Miller woul bring mediocrity back to our blazers and a selfish / me first attitude.
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:42 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Lol
We have a better record than last year and feltons stats are identical to what miller had all last year. Look at the big picture. Not individual games. Lol. I’ll take 7/1 assist to TO any night. Dave missed the boat on this recap. Miller woul bring mediocrity back to our blazers and a selfish / me first attitude.
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:42 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Double post - my bad
And Felton has only played 11 games with this team! Miller took 1/2 a season to “warm up”
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:43 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
bricking bad shots should really count as turn overs too
Felton may still settle in with time but so far he hasn’t even approached what Miller gave us. Not stat wise either. Got to count efficiency.
I am glad somebody else is noting this
Even when JC is hitting he is a liability because he is PG and no one else will touch the ball. He gets 20 pts the rest of the team gets 0. that is not team play.
hg
We really need a backup PG
to distribute to either Batum or Crawford depending on who has a better chance to score instead of Crawford trying to score every possession. Still don’t know much about Nolan’s game as a passer.
its expected, but the team is still good.
8 games on the road will show a lot as far as resilience the team has. Bad shooting will have to stop. Or turnovers. Or something has to happen.
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man.
by SGT Lenny on Jan 13, 2012 10:16 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Hehe. The Blazers are such good shooters though,
the only problem is the long periods where the ball just won’t go in. So yeah. Not making shots. Otherwise, their shooting is terrific!
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 13, 2012 10:25 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
It might be a good idea to develop a hobby
or fallback television show. Camby picked a hell of a time to tweak his ankle. Second to the playoffs in worst time, actually. Let’s hope he’s back soon and the team can find a way to go .500 on this trip…
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 13, 2012 10:23 PM PST via mobile reply actions
My wife just left me so.....blazers please dont suck!
OSU '06
GForce Crash Wallace FTW!
by TyboOSU on Jan 13, 2012 10:58 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Aw, man. Sorry to hear that, brother.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 8:36 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Spooky...
Mike Barrett just posted on twitter:
Looking at box score. Friday the 13th. Camby’s playing time in the game, exactly 13:13. Not kidding.
by DefenderOfPants on Jan 13, 2012 10:26 PM PST reply actions
Anybody
else feel like Nate should just start Johnson at C and give him at least 30 minutes?
I think the last thing this team needs is another Brandon roy
I think it needs a point guard, an an inside presence. A coordinated team effort where the numbers are even across the board, like the adelman teams. That’s what I’d like to see.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jan 13, 2012 10:30 PM PST via mobile reply actions
During Adelmen's tenure, Drexler dominated the ball more than Roy ever did.
What are you talking about? Brandon Roy was the third-best player this franchise has had.
What is boring?
Roy was the best I’ve ever seen at completely breaking down a set, half-court defense. It was a beautiful thing to watch. That was great basketball.
And 8 other guys just standing in the corner?
Okay.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jan 13, 2012 11:15 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
And what were they doing last night?
They would throw the ball into LMA, cut through and go to the opposite corner and stand and wait to see what LMA was going to do. While everybody else was at stationary positions waiting to see what LMA would do.
hg
Are saying Drexler was better than Roy?
Are you drafting players for NBA2K? Are you on franchise mode?
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jan 13, 2012 11:12 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Drexler was better than Roy
Saw them both. Clyde dominated. Brandon did too in his way but Clyde did it every night. If Brandon had been granted a whole career he may have ended up better than Clyde but as it is, Clyde gets the nod.
—Dave
Well, there were those nights he played MJ... But yeah, Clyde was better than Roy.
No doubt about it.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 14, 2012 12:24 AM PST up reply actions
Even if true
(and I think that aspect has been overblown) his laurels were better than most people’s 110% effort.
—Dave
Whoa!
I wasnt prepared for us to lose this many games the WHOLE season.
And its Only the first month, well I really overestimated this team, then again I thought Greg Oden was gonna win MVP this year too so maybe I need to take off my ROSE colored glases
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
Also An Apology to MR. Tiago Splitter
I was on here the other wekk calling you a bum and using you for an example for why Joel Freeland sucks
Sir, if you can read English please forgive me, I was really wrong about you.
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
so, you could be wrong about Freeland then ?
Let’s get Freeland over here !
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Make the deal pronto
He can have my room and me and my wife will sleep on the couch
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
Crawford is not a 1
Crawford is a 2. I was wondering, like with every other 2 this team has tried to make a 1, if it would work, and it hasn’t. What baffles me is why Nate keeps playing Felton alongside Crawford, but Crawford keeps starting the play. what’s the point of that?
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jan 13, 2012 10:45 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Felton isn't playing like an NBA-caliber 1 either. He has been horrible.
I miss Andre Miller greatly.
I don't miss him
Or mediocrity. His stats and win percentage are below feltons, and Felton just joined this group. #bigpicture. Not one game analysis.
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:45 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I'll re-read this...
So if his stats are the same as millers and we have a better win percentage, are you saying miller is horrendous???? Then I agree…
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:51 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Felton's stats aren't the same as Miller's this season
or as Miller’s stats were last season for that matter and using win percentage of the first 11 games with the wins almost all being home wins, starting the season with GW and sitting pretty with a 2 game slide…not sure that’s a great argument to use against Dre.
I’m still hoping Felton can get it in gear but it really feels like you’re underrating Andre Miller badly.
Felton has been pretty bad
But his defense has been worse. At least Miller, while slow laterally, knew how to use his body strength, muscle smaller defenders, anticipate the passing lanes and fight through picks. I don’t see Felton doing any of this regularly. He’s been terrible on offense so far, although sometimes he has his moment son dribble penetration and makes a nice feed.
Felton could never hold Miller’s jock strap – it’s all in the numbers. He’s always had a much inferior PER, defensive WS, shooting percentage etc. He’s just an inferior player. The only thing that makes it more even know is the age factor. Felton will turn it around and have some very good games, but he’ll also have his share of horror shows. He’s always been that way. Career 14.4 PER is borderline average starting PG on an average team, so I’m not sure why people expected greatness. He’s at about 10.9 PER now which is PUTRID.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Nice to know LMA still has plenty of elite PF mojo left
He would have scored over 50 if a couple of the guards hadn’t kept forgetting about him.
An elite PF should grab more than 7 rebounds, especially when his team is....
getting crushed on the boards.
foul trouble
he was on pace for double figure rebounds early. I can’t fault him this game.
LMA's rebounding is overemphasized, usually
Rebounding is typically a symptom of shooting. On some occasions, it represents a deficiency if the other team is offensive rebounding. Tonight, the Spurs only got one more offensive rebound than the Blazers. Problem is – it was nearly half as many as the defensive rebounds the Blazers brought down. Bigger problem, Spurs made over half their shots.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 13, 2012 11:39 PM PST up reply actions
For a Song
Patty Mills ‘10-’11
FG% – 0.412
3p% – 0.353
TO/minute – 1/12.2
Raymond Felton ‘11-’12
FG% – 0.345
3p% – 0.167
TO/minute – 1/11.96
Jamal Crawford ‘11-’12
FG% – 0.372
3p% – 0.306
TO/minute – 1/13.38
I’m not sayin’ we need to make a change, I’m just sayin’.
"I'm not trying to brag or anything, but I'm exciting."
- Jamal Crawford
I'm ready when Patty is
He can play for Nate now, is probably available, and is needed.
Just a change on the bench, making the bench better.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
He is not available until China season is over
That is in march
I was hoping the injury waiver released him sooner.
Maybe they can make a deal.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Chine already released him
and he’ll probably be ready to play in a week or two. He was at the game against Orlando and went to the locker room and visited the team.
This is incorrect
His team released him, the CBA has not. He needs a clearance letter from the CBA to the FIBA, which will not happen. If his former team doesn’t make the playoffs, he will be available mid February (pending his health). If they do, he will be available anytime late feb or early march.
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:47 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Can i just say, without giving to much away
Patty getting his letter of clearance is not a problem, there is a legal loop hole in his case. Its just a case of there is no point in seeking a clearance until he has a team to be cleared to.
Then why aren't
Wilson Chandler, J.R. Smith, and Kenyon Martin playing right now?
by ZenGarden on Jan 14, 2012 10:38 AM PST via Android app up reply actions
Well
In talking with those guys personally, I don’t think any legal loophole will help. The CBA is vindictive and corrupt. None of them will play til their current teams season ends.
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 11:09 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
thanks for the clarification.
It sounds like the China team season end may not be too far off anyway.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Maturity and Discipline
Games like tonight show you that a team needs a guy who can take over a game and score when nothing else is going right. Felton, Matthews, Jamal Crawford…all have auditioned for that spot this season and failed badly. Brandon Roy gave this team a safety net that they just haven’t replaced.
Time to ditch the baby blanket and stop wetting the bed…Execute like professionals in the face of adversity.
That is all.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
Andre did play that role repeatedly, keeping the team in a game.
He got along great with his teammates, showed passion to win. I just never understood the trading him out from an on court perspective. I really didn’t care if he was not ‘media friendly’.
And as far as issues with Nate, I tended to agree with him. Another blunder in my book, unless some new Ray emerges.
Of course Roy was great, but we didn’t dump him intentionally.
Actually our team has a record of performing pretty well in the face of adversity in the past.
Just have to tune in and see what happens next.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
Miller was a loner
No on or off the court chemisty with the team. Did you hear any blazers say “man, we miss him or need him?”.
Nope. Don’t you remember the practice where he and Nate came to blows???
by comptoncory on Jan 14, 2012 2:49 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
He made layups
I’d take Miller right now.
by ZenGarden on Jan 14, 2012 10:40 AM PST via Android app up reply actions
I don't agree about the 'no on court chemistry'
As if players are PUBLICLY going to say ‘we miss him or need him’ – that proves nothing.
Yeah he may have been a loner, it is a way some people protect themselves against things like the bogus trade for Felton. I just don’t see the guy you seem to.
I certainly do remember he had an issue with Nate, which I expect why he is gone, unfortunately to the detriment of the team.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
I think he’s gone because the FO thought (incorrectly) they were getting an equivalent player who is 7 years younger.
i keep dancing on my own.
yeah, age was a factor
and yeah, all too incorrectly is appears. What makes the age agruement so weak is that it seems recognized that this may just be a one year term. ‘Iron Man’ Andre was pretty certainly good for one more year. If we were taling long term star, like Rhondo or even Rubio, I could understand that, but not what happened.
As an ‘old guy’ I’m not real sympathetic with people wanting to dump the over 30 contingent. Trust me kids, these guys can still be great.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
the age thing is pretty much it
I can’t really fault them for trying though. They have to plan for the future and Ray was the best chance they had of finding something that could work.
I hope they’re right actually. I’d rather find out that Felton actually knows what he’s doing and is a capable starting PG for this team than the other way around. I’m just losing patience.
I don't get that.
Several players with limited play making skills and streaky outside shooting are somehow supposed to get each other open? That’s just not logical. It’s simply a lack of talent, not a lack of professionalism. The effort is there. Nate’s stuff is actually getting these guys open, they’re just not good enough to finish inside and make their shots. The team is playing a lot like a team led by Raymond Felton.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 10:25 AM PST up reply actions
Quick: After an ankle rolls in San Antonio, does a phone ring in Milwaukee?
Buchanan smiled wryly when I asked him if he had called Przybilla after Camby’s injury.
"I stay in touch,’’ Buchanan said, chuckling. "Because we are close friends. How do you know I don’t call him every day?’’
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 14, 2012 12:28 AM PST reply actions
Swap one broken-down old man for another.
Sounds like a plan!
"I Am Mine"
by AK1984 on Jan 14, 2012 12:59 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
We have an army of oft injured centers on call
That strikes me with a bit of dark humor for some reason.
Ghost of Joel present
Is not going to keep up with ghost of Joel past.
by aces_dad on Jan 14, 2012 1:47 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Crawford.
So many of his misses are unrebounded. A chucker.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
by Blazin' on Jan 14, 2012 1:10 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Is there a stat that tracks that?
My gut says you’re right on the money.
a statistical definition of "chucker" perhaps ?
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
DEFINITION chucking
In computer and telephone use, chucking is the process of discarding a small piece of hardware by violent means, such as hurling it out a window, against a wall, or into a body of water. The term can also apply to devices tossed into active fireplaces, camp fires, or brush fires. Any type of hardware can be chucked, but this solution is employed most often in cases where a cell phone user, disgusted with poor performance or inadequate coverage, comes for a brief moment to the conclusion that the device is the bane of life. A person who chucks a piece of hardware is called a chucker.
Chucking can be an expensive practice if it becomes habitual. A few vendors will honor the warranty of a chucked item if the warranty is still in force, but such benevolence is rare. A word of warning for chuckers: some cell phone batteries contain hazardous materials that require special treatment when disposed of, and some components can explode if incinerated.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
I don't have a statistical definition
It just seems that he shoots the ball spontaneously and without any offensive flow, so there is no timing with rebounders.
"The only 'Advanced Metric' that matters is what you see with your eyes." -Timbo, Nov., 2009.
i can hear oden's music playing now in houston
here he comes running in the arena with a cape, a mask and a steel chair!
Not enough beef, not enough brains, not enough beer
Without Camby this team has no chance to compete with 80% of the teams. Chris Johnson is a joke at center and Kurt Thomas cannot be expected to play big minutes.
I give Felton and Crawford a little more lease as they are still trying to find their way, but so far they are showing far more weaknesses than strengths- not a good indicator.
I think Nate needs to pull the plug on both of these guys when they are throwing up bricks and start calling plays – Mathews was having a decent game but never got the ball after the third. Same for Batum. Both of these guys are better shooters, but Felton and Crawford are dominating the shot charts.
This looks like a repeat of many prior seasons – dare the Blazers to make a jumper is the best strategy to not only get us in a hole, but stop us from being aggressive.
by ralphzillo on Jan 14, 2012 9:13 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
There's no legit backup center or PG.
Nate has little choice except to go with Crawford. I guess he could call plays, but what, exactly, is Crawford going to run with his limited skill at point? Wesley and Nic can’t handle the ball well enough to run plays through unless the defense is stagnant.
This is the hand Nate has been dealt. What’s really irritating, though, is that the Blazers drafted another combo with Cole and Jenkins on the board. I know, both of those guys are basically PG projects too, but AT LEAST they can shoot, and shoot well.
But relying on a rookie to right the ship just means you’re headed the wrong direction. For better or worse, this team is going to reach its destination with Felton and Crawford as its primary (and only) ball handlers and play makers.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 9:49 AM PST up reply actions
I wouldn't be surprised if Nolan got some minutes on this trip.
We’ve seen Nate change PGs when things aren’t clicking.
Stay tuned, I guess;)
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 10:21 AM PST up reply actions
This
Is the hand Nate wanted. Does anyone really think Buchanan has more juice the Nate when it comes to players? Nate got what he wanted veterans. Nate was gushing about Crawford. This is Nates team, his plan. It’s a short run, that will work until you hit the playoffs and the team collapses under the weight of too much playing time do to inability to develop young role players. The early success is very bad for the long term viability of this team, because this team is not a viable contender. This coach is not a viable playoff coach as his record proves. No more excuses. This is Nates team. If he is one and done, and limits the long term potential of batum the the season will be a disaster.
The smart move would be to move Wallace, Felton, crawford for PG of the future. That package might be enough to get a real talent. Star at pg and PF, defensive team player at sf, all around player at SG. Center would be the only ?
Teams don't trade upper tier point guards.
We’ve been down this road a million times. Deron is going to be a UFA. Paul had to ok the trade. Several ‘good’ players do not add up to a great one. Besides, the package you just described is basically a way for a team to drop salary. Who in their right mind is just going to ditch a PGOTF level player for a few players with expiring deals?
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 14, 2012 11:21 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Tough! I know
But say Boston wanted to make one more run with Wallace, Felton and camby? Not sure any other contenders have a pgtf that might be available by a team making a run.
I agree that Nate is the 'last man standing'
with PA’s confidence, and it is Nate’s team. I just hope that if this doesn’t work we can try a new vision, starting with a new coach. Nate’s team has been more interesting this year and of course shown promise. My big gripe this season was the skip Faried and trade Andre for Felton move. A clear upgrade at point would have been good, that was not.. We certainly need an experienced packup point. Not excited about moving Wallace.
But, anyway, Nate gets what he wants, he has this season to deliver. He has developed and changed, I hope it turns out well. We will very likely have ups and downs. Playoffs will be a big bellweather.
Somewhere Michael Jordan is smiling at Gerald Wallace Blazer highlights.
My big gripe this season was the skip Faried and trade Andre for Felton move. A clear upgrade at point would have been good, that was not..
That’s exactly my grape too. We could have went year-to-year with Dre, and drafted a big man like Faried who would have filled a HUGE need for this team. Camby in pushing 40 and goes down to injury every year – he’s not dependable. Now, we’re screwing while Camby rests in the team infirmary.
Then we go out and obtain Felton, a completely lateral move in the best of times, and draft a combo guard with our first round pick. It all makes no sense to me – even less so now that Felton is stinking it up with a 10.9 PER and bad defense 11 games into the season.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
And then Nate further compounds the problem
By playing Jamal Crawford at the point letting Nolan Smith waste away on the bench.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Agreed
And don’t forget Reggie Jackson was there too, and is getting consistent (if not limited) burn with OKC. He’ll get more with Maynor out for the season now.
What’s really irritating, though, is that the Blazers drafted another combo with Cole and Jenkins on the board.
Henne is the greatest and the Dolphins will go 14-2 this year and win the SB
Also a sure way to make us lose the game.
IMO, Crawford alone lost us the lead and maybe the game.
hg
Crawford
Is all Nate. Nate was just falling over himself when he joined the team. Shame he can’t do that a bit for young talent like batum. Help build confidence. You can’t just keep tearing these kids down. Well this year Nate has a vet team, so he can try and get lucky and make a run by over playing the rotation. If someone gets hurt he can use his get out of jail free injury card again. Nate coaches for Nate.

by 


































