Game 11 Preview: Portland Trail Blazers vs. San Antonio Spurs
Game Time: 5:30 p.m. Pacific TV: CSNNW
Tonight's matchups feature two teams doing well in the New Western Conference. Portland sits at 7-3, San Antonio at 7-4. The Spurs' losses have at least one commonality: all have happened on the road. Two of Portland's three losses have also come on the road. Since San Antonio is the home team tonight Portland will have to overcome at two trends to find a victory.
The big development for San Antonio is the loss of Manu Ginobili who is out several weeks recovering from hand surgery. Ginobili has been the Spurs' leading scorer at 17 per game, a designation made more impressive by his relative lack of minutes at 23 per. San Antonio stars Tony Parker and Tim Duncan aren't scoring that much in 30+ mpg. Parker is doing fine at 15.5 and 7 assists per game but his shooting percentage has been questionable compared to his norm. The Spurs aren't getting a ton of fast break points so his only easy scores are coming from the foul line. Having Ginobili out doesn't help in freeing him up. Helping even less is the continuing decline of Tim Duncan. He's playing 26.5 minutes per game and averaging 12 points and 6 boards. His shooting percentage is down to 45%, barely higher than Parker's 44%. This is like watching Renoir paint those big-head portraits at your county fair. I mean, they're cool and you'll hang it on your wall with pride, but we're used to seeing museum-quality work from the guy. This is not that Tim Duncan.
So how are the Spurs riding high at 7-4 with one star out, one star at half of his old self, and one star looking so-so compared to his peak? They're dang smart, that's how. They're smart enough to get the right shots for all of their second-unit guys, making the team look deep. They're smart enough to run the most efficient offense in the NBA. They're 2nd in the league in three-point percentage, 7th in overall shooting percentage. They're 3rd overall in points per game. That's normally an iffy stat because it's pace- and style-dependent but guess what? They're 20th in the league in possessions per game. That's huge. By comparison Portland is 4th in points per game but also 3rd in possessions per game. San Antonio's 100 points come in far different fashion than Portland's 100 points.
Unsurprisingly the Spurs rank highly in assists and take great care of the ball.
If there's a breakdown in the Spurs' machine, it's on defense. San Antonio allows points, points in the paint, fast break points, and high percentages from both the field and three-point line. They're not the intimidating defensive squad they once were, much of that attributable to Duncan's aging.
The Blazers have to watch out for a few things in this game. Parker has long been an issue for them but this year's squad should be better able to deal with him. Duncan and Aldridge have always been a good matchup. Portland probably won't have to sweat them as much as San Antonio's three-point shooters: Richard Jefferson (on fire right now), Matt Bonner, Gary Neal, Daniel Green. The Blazers will also have to worry about rebounding with Duncan, DeJuan Blair, and Tiago Splitter on the other side. The counter to this, though I'm not sure it's the vehicle to get Portland playing right as much as a symptom that they are playing right, is the quick tempo. Portland only needs to defend and rebound well enough to get running. With injuries the Spurs are thin, especially at guard. If Portland can force the pace their athleticism will start to tell. If the Spurs are tired those shots and rebounds will be more difficult and mistakes more easy. As with the last game, you don't want to play a slow, turn-based strategy against this team. Real-time-strategy all the way. Loop your players with the cursor, click on the other end of the court, and go.
You'll find plenty of good stuff over at Pounding The Rock.
You can find your Jersey Contest form for tonight's game here.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
go blazers!
we desperately need a road win, we need a road win streak! with whats comin our way!
GO BLAZERS
BTW: where is everyone tonight?
by cavejunctionblazer on Jan 12, 2012 10:08 PM PST reply actions
Winning this one would drastically increase the chance of going .500 or better on the road
I hope the Blazers respect the Spurs enough to show up in the first quarter. This is the NBA. There are very few teams in the league that you can get away with taking the first 3 quarters off against.
Go Blazers!
As a player of Starcraft I also love the RTS reference Dave.
by blazer_tk on Jan 12, 2012 10:42 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Blazers are all about the micro
- in control with high apm
Blazers did have a higher macro last year when they got 6 on the court though.
GO BLAZERS WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
Definitely micro
for Felton to Wallace on the break.
Macro would be getting LMA deep post position
Would different lineups
be different unit group hotkeys?
on Nates keyboard
I think the Wallace, Aldridge, Felton, Wesley keys would be broken off the keyboard from being hit so many times
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
a nice extended winning streak would be good to have
make a statement. not like I’m going to be that upset with losing a few times.
Hope Wallace turns his road trend around
should be easier to do against a slow team and a day of rest
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
here is a quote from the Spurs blog:
One of the biggest reasons we’ve had such trouble with Portland in years past was because of a certain point guard named Andre Miller. He was one of the few guards who was always able to guard Parker. Without him, I can see Parker having a big game, hopefully we can offset Aldridge enough to improve to 8-0 at home, but it’s going to be a tight one. If Crawford goes off though, I can see this being a long night for the Spurs.
Always read that Miller was a liability when it came to defense. I never saw it, but others have…and they probably know more than I do. Guess Miller was able to guard TP…What about Felton? Isn’t he supposed to be better at defense than Miller??
Every time I hear his name
my mind immediately fills int he blank with “coulda been a Spur.”
Could have, that is, if the Spurs pick was one earlier and Portland’s was one later that year. Just love his game.
Ah, well.
When you’re this scared while dribbling by yourself, you really shouldn’t be dribbling. - bj1der
Pounding the Rock
Or Matthews, with Manu out
Wes is poised for a good game, not having to guard Ginobilli, and not having Manu guard him.
Phase 1: Collect underpants
Phase 2: ???
Phase 3: Profit!
2nd in three-point percentage?
Oh, dear god, no
by DefenderOfPants on Jan 13, 2012 1:27 AM PST reply actions
they'd better make sure to double team DUNCAN
The Blazers had better come out to play in the first quarter. I can kind of understand the Clippers game, when they were in LA on NYEve. Or even the Phoenix game when they most likely didn’t get much sleep…but the Orlando game was pretty lame.
If they are that capable of working in the 4th quarter..how about the first 3?
Hopefully Nate McMillan will get these guys to work throughout the game.
I don’t want to hear about how the other team came out on fire. I’d rather hear him talk about how HIS team didn’t.
Too tired to play the first 3 quarters
and yet tons of energy to spend in the 4th after playing 3 quarters. Crazy!
It's hard to double a guy who's working off the ball
setting picks and getting to open spots on the floor, which is much the way that Duncan’s been used this year.
While it’s true that since Manu went down, they’ve gone more to Timmeh on the blocks as they used to do, he’s nowhere near as dominant, and good defenders (see: Bogut, Andrew) have been able to contain him and let the rest of the defense stay home.
But if the Blazers do double, then that will make it easier to find open 3 point shooters, which is where most of S.A.’s offense is coming from this year — so maybe I like the doubling idea more after all.
When you’re this scared while dribbling by yourself, you really shouldn’t be dribbling. - bj1der
Pounding the Rock
after the Magic game we'll probably be a little gun-shy about leaving shooters open to help inside
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
Well, it actually makes some sense against ORL
but I can’t say that about doubling Duncan at this point of his career, unless he’s just having an insane night against you. It hurts to admit, but he’s just not that dominant anymore, and the risk involved with doubling off the outside guys is too great — I guess what I’m saying is that they’re more consistent than Timmeh is at this point of the season.
When you’re this scared while dribbling by yourself, you really shouldn’t be dribbling. - bj1der
Pounding the Rock
I agree
and it does make more sense with ORL based on the impact of the respective big, but if you can just send Dwight to the line that is preferable to leaving the shooters. Timmy isn’t as attractive to put at the line, but he’s also not the force Dwight is. I’ll take a few bank shot jabs over gut punches from the 3 pt line tonight after getting rained on Wednesday night.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Jan 13, 2012 10:53 AM PST up reply actions
How about that
We’re on the same page even though we’re in opposite books!
That said, I think Pop will still be able to scheme a few ways to get the shooters some open looks from deep. Question is: just how open will they be, and will they hit them?
Also, expect to see the ball being passed out to Duncan out around the FT line and extended. Overall, he’s hitting pretty well from there this year, but it’s up and down, like anyone else.
When you’re this scared while dribbling by yourself, you really shouldn’t be dribbling. - bj1der
Pounding the Rock
think it was meant as a dig at our last game
where every guy on the team wanted to double Dwight while Orlando shooters had a field day. Easier to watch one guy then 5 I guess.
Ahh, I see
Yes, 1 is much easier.
When you’re this scared while dribbling by yourself, you really shouldn’t be dribbling. - bj1der
Pounding the Rock
We will win this game
We surely respect SAS; we always play them tough; we know we have to improve our road games win to at least 500, and although SAS is old they are still good, Nevertheless, this is a winnable game, and I think the Blazers like in OKC will go out and get it.
hg
LMA's cancer-free mother!
He’s going off for 50+20+10+10.
I don't always root for an NBA franchise, but when I do, I prefer the Portland Trail Blazers.
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Jan 13, 2012 9:19 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Somebody Over on O-Live
Had this to say:
Seems to me if you want to beat the Blazers. You have to beat them in the first quarter. They get a lot better as the game wears on and they lose if there is a substantial deficit to overcome…
So true. We have got to win the first quarter.
"I'm not trying to brag or anything, but I'm exciting."
- Jamal Crawford
All 3 of our losses have come the same way.
We came out looking like basketball is a chore that ought to be procrastinated until the very last minute. Playing in Phoenix apparently ranks right up there with cleaning the bathroom. When will we realize that the toilet doesn’t clean itself? Every single game matters in a 66 game season. ‘Sarge’ needs to get his platoon ready for battle, ‘cause right now they’re all still stashing jelly donuts in their foor lockers.
To be fair
Phoenix is a pretty unpleasant place.
by vitaminx on Jan 13, 2012 7:58 AM PST via Android app up reply actions 1 recs
Not really sure about that.
We stay close to them and then win it in the fourth.
Last year we stayed ahead in the first 3 quarters only to fold in the fourth.
Of course it would be better to just play like we did against OKC and LAL, but everything doesn’t work out that way.
My belief is the way to beat the Blazers is to have ball pressure and sag to the middle with everyone else.
hg
7-3 sounds okay but...
When you look at our league leading strength of schedule it’s easy to see why it is still okay to get extra excited about our team. The other teams close to our SOS are 3-7 or 2-9.
What sucks is
the 3 losses were 3 of the most winnable games.
Are we not always guilty
of losing to the teams that are most winnable.
But as we look back at it now, LAC is a tough team, Orlando has shooters, and Phoenix is a team that we have problems with. Plus our shooters are not consistent, we haven’t gotten in full string with the faster pace, so all in all we are doing great.
hg
LAC – Turnover fest
PHX – Flat, never had a pulse
ORL – awful gameplan or awful execution for 3 quarters
all back to backs?
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
There's a pretty obvious pattern for sure
And it looks more like an energy issue than a talent or tactics issue (except for the carnsarn Orlando strategy debacle). We either come out and punch the other team in the mouth at the opening bell, or we cover up and stumble around the ring until the 7th round and then remember we’re a top ranked fighter and start fighting back.
The year before last I seem to recall the same slow start problem, but we usually started making a game of it in the second quarter, not the fourth…and we had Brandon doing his fourth quarter thing to cap some of those finishes.
We better figure out how to get our legs under us a little quicker despite the fatigue, or it’s going to be a long, short season.
Weird thing is they seem to have infinite energy in the 4th
Second wind? Boggles the mind that guys could play terrible for 3 quarters and somehow hit that second wind in the 4th reliably.
4th quarter thing
It’s probably more a relative energy thing. We play an energetic style, and in the 4th the other team starts looking a little sloppier and less energetic which creates more opportunities which creates more energy.
I don’t think we need to win the first few quarters we just need to stay close. Play smart, take what’s given, and then start feasting when the other teams are slowing down.
Yeah, the relativity is a part of it
But the difference is so ridiculously pronounced. The three games we’ve lost, the first quarter has looked like we didn’t even expect to have to play a game or something, like the players thought it was going to be a walkthrough or a game of horse. They seem shell shocked. Three quarters later they’re steamrolling.
I was telling my friend during the game that in a way it’s more frustrating when they lay down for three quarters and then mount the almost-comeback than when they just mail in the whole game. It’s like, “Just so you know, we COULD HAVE won this game if we wanted to. We just didn’t feel like it at first.”
Orlando just played their game perfectly - gotta give them some respect
when they start missing threes then they fall apart, like in the playoffs every year. As fat as PHO and LAC I think we could beat them on most nights
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
I'll give them credit for hitting the shots
I think they should credit us with getting the shots
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Jan 13, 2012 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
this
we make it hard on ourselves by letting the other team get shots in their “comfort zones” in the first and second quarters. Knock them off balance early and make them feel like they need to work a little for their shots.
Part of the reason why teams shot so well against us last year. We let them heat up and get in rhythm.
If feels like if we crank up the defense the scoring follows. If we try the gun battle with the other team we struggle.
Yep, exactly.
I’m not trying to take away the fact that they executed their gameplan perfectly, but we sure did a great job of playing right into it. It’s like Van Gundy conjured himself up as Nate and drew up the defensive plan for the blazers. “Coach, you sure we should just collapse to the paint and worry about how we’re going to cover three point shooters later?” “Yep, we have to protect our paint! Triple teams on Howard all around!”
And then he slithered back to the away team practice facility before the illusion faded, threw his head back, and laughed and laughed and laughed.
They had some days off to watch tape of the blazers
we just came off an emotion win, we will have a better chance next time we play them
The tensions are so high because the stakes are so low!
Dave's a pastor
who loves the Blazers which is cool. I’ve known a few pastors who enjoyed sports. Some of them an awful lot. But I don’t think I’ve known one who could make any sort of video game reference.
Dave makes pop culture references like eating a tube of pringles.
Once you pop, the fun don’t stop.
I don't always root for an NBA franchise, but when I do, I prefer the Portland Trail Blazers.
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Jan 13, 2012 9:17 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
I will be watching this game with a lady friend who's from SA.
Needless to say, my cheers will be extra obnoxious tonight.
I don't always root for an NBA franchise, but when I do, I prefer the Portland Trail Blazers.
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Jan 13, 2012 9:14 AM PST via mobile reply actions
That sounds like a good opportunity for a little wager.
If you play it right, you can’t lose…
Like JCrossover, I'm 2 steps ahead of you.
Good thinking, still.
I don't always root for an NBA franchise, but when I do, I prefer the Portland Trail Blazers.
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Jan 13, 2012 2:44 PM PST via mobile up reply actions

by 





































