Game 10 Recap: Portland Trail Blazers 104, Orlando Magic 107
In a Nutshell
The Blazers come out slow, tired, not covering for each other on defense, and rotating about as fast as Venus on Valium. (Obscure astronomy facts FTW!) As a result the Magic score in their predictable places: deep inside and deep outside. The constant hail of threes dents Portland into near-oblivion. A fourth-quarter turnover and dash flurry brings the Blazers back within three late but small mistakes prevent the miracle comeback.
Game Flow
The Blazers announced their intentions to lose this game immediately after the ball tipped. Jason Richardson missed a three to open the proceedings for Orlando but Ryan Anderson grabbed the offensive rebound and converted at the rim. The next play Jameer Nelson drove and converted at the rim. Right after Nelson drove again and converted at the rim. Then Jason Richardson dunked. Two minutes gone, Orlando leads 8-0, timeout, Portland. The Blazers made a better effort stopping penetration and collapsing on the ball after that. So the Magic responded by hitting 6 threes in the final 10 minutes of the period. Many opponents don't hit 6 threes against Portland in a game. Portland, meanwhile, took mostly jumpers and missed out on all the rebounds. Score: 36-22 after one.
The second period saw the lead open to a full 20 as did the third. The story remained the same. The willing help that so typifies Portland's defense was absent, perhaps because of fatigue and perhaps because of their fear of Dwight Howard. Big men did not help the small guys contain penetration. Small guys dropped down on Howard and other Orlando bigs--a move necessitated by Marcus Camby's early foul trouble trying to guard Dwight--but then they didn't close out on shooters at all. Nobody got around Orlando screens, period. With the exception of a late flurry at the end of the first half it was just slop. The only things saving the Blazers were Jamal Crawford lighting up the room like a hot stewardess and the occasional pick and pop from LaMarcus Aldridge or drive from Gerald Wallace. Orlando went 11-18 on three-pointers in the first half. Portland shot 5-7 on their own threes and still ended up down a dozen at halftime. The Magic went to Dwight Howard more in the third. He either bulldozed his way to the bucket or passed for yet another open three. Orlando led 85-68 at the end of the third.
Then all of a sudden the Blazers found the life that had eluded them earlier. Their comeback was built on three pillars: force turnovers, get out to shooters, and run a two-man game with the smoking-hot Crawford and always-ready Aldridge on offense. Lo and behold, it worked. The normally sure-handed Orlando passers and dribblers bowed before Portland's swarming athletes. Three-pointers that had gone in with such ease for the visitors now looked choked. Before you could say, "Trade for a point guard!" the lead was down to single digits and then low single digits.
As former Blazers commentator and all-around guru Steve Jones used to say, though, in order for this kind of comeback to work everything has to go right. It didn't quite. The first turn-around came at the 7:40 mark of the fourth when the Blazers had just cut the lead to 10, basically in half from their nadir. The Magic went inside to Howard and he converted. Then J.J. Reddick hit a jumper, the kind that had been missing for the Magic in the fourth. Suddenly the lead was 14 again. You wondered if that was it. The frantic Blazers battled back with some key jumpers followed by nice drives and incredibly got the lead down to 3 with 2:40 left. Then in succession Hedo Turkoglu drove by Gerald Wallace unopposed and made a layup followed by a three-pointer. At 1:40 the lead was 8 again. But the Blazers went Admiral Ackbar on Jameer Nelson and any other Magic player who put more than two consecutive dribbles together. The Magic had 2 turnovers in 4 possessions and could only manage a single free throw for scoring. Meanwhile Wallace, Crawford, and Matthews all made layups. With 32 seconds left the Blazers were down only 3. This is when the final error occurred.
Had the Blazers played good defense they would have had the chance to tie the game with 8 seconds or so left on the clock. Instead Nicolas Batum fouled Jason Richardson with 28 seconds remaining as the Blazers attempted yet another trap. On the one hand you have to dance with the girl that brung you and that trap was clearly the reason the Blazers pulled within striking distance late. Had they abandoned it and Orlando scored we would be second-guessing the decision. On the other hand the trap is inherently risky for a couple of reasons. First, if it doesn't succeed you often allow an easier shot than had you just played straight-up "D". Second, you risk the foul. Richardson made 1 of his 2 free throws but that was enough to put the Blazers behind the 8-ball. Crawford scored on the ensuing play but the Blazers were forced to foul J.J. Redick, a great foul shooter. He sunk both to put the Magic up 4 with 16 seconds left. The next missed three (which came 5 seconds later) effectively ended the game. Orlando walks away with a 3-point victory on a night when Portland fought hard for approximately 1/3 of the game.
Take-Away Points
We said going in that this was a stylistic and matchup nightmare for the Blazers and it showed. The Magic's game just dumbfounded Portland. The Blazers had to do something about Howard and their only option was to commit extra men. As soon as they did so they were dead on the perimeter. On a night where feet weren't moving that fast it was just an impossible quandary to solve. Furthermore, every time the Magic got threatened until that furious fourth-quarter flurry they simply chucked the ball inside to Howard and let him stuff it down Portland's throat. He was the argument-ender for most of this game. Every time the Blazers got out on shooters it was like, "Oooh! Shame on you! Wait until your Daddy gets home..." Howard only scored 13 but then again he only took 9 shots. Besides, Glen Davis had a similar effect. The Magic broke Portland's inside defense and then shot over the crumbled remains. The only real success the Blazers had in this regard was late in the game when Aldridge slapped a couple low catches away from Howard. Those were good plays but not reliable enough to depend on. In short, the first reaction to this game is respect towards the Magic for being who they are.
You also have to give respect to the Blazers for getting the game back close after this was going to be a demoralizing blowout. But that respect comes with a caveat that this team stunk it up for much of the game, especially early. Again, much of that came down to mismatches beyond their control. But some of it was either fatigue or effort.
People want to cite back-to-backs as a problem. And indeed the Blazers have suffered on the second night a couple times now. But in this 2011-12 season you're going to have to choose one of two truths and abandon the other:
1. The Blazers do not or cannot perform well on the second night of back-to-backs or when the schedule fatigues them either because of a short rotation or their energy-intensive style.
2. The Blazers are going to be in or near the top tier of this league.
Even if you don't chalk this up to style or any weakness of the team besides tired legs, you can still only have one or the other of those two, but not both. The schedule is simply going to be brutal this year. The Blazers deal with it well or the record suffers. That's it.
The elephant in the closet, the unacknowledged skeleton in the room, is that the Blazers are succeeding in part because they are only playing 8 guys. I've heard people blame this on Coach McMillan but what do you do? Part of the story of this roster is that the bench is either marginal or outright stinks past position #8 when you compare these players to most teams' second-units. It's not like you can hand the ball to Nolan Smith right now, nor play Luke Babbitt or either Johnson for 20 minutes. Craig Smith is the closest thing to an NBA-ready player after Kurt Thomas sits down and even he's mostly only good for rebounding. Yet the Blazers are going to have to make a choice of their own: either get these guys minutes, see if they can do anything, and take the losses while you find out (perhaps getting a "no" answer at the end for your trouble) or try to keep the rotation to 7.5 guys and suffer multiple nights like this one, again taking losses along the way. I guess Option C is trying to make a deal to get more live bodies...or at least one more.
This is not an easy puzzle to work out but the Blazers will have to come up with a pretty good answer if the record is to remain shiny. We're only 3.5 weeks into this season. The issue will only get more pressing as the year marches on.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge exploded late in this game, teaming up with Crawford and Wallace to put the screws to the Magic and make them sweat. He finished the game 10-17 for 23 points with 8 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals. His late-game defense on Howard was opportune and helped (almost) save the game for Portland.
Jamal Crawford had his game of the season so far tonight. He was hitting everything from everywhere and not apologizing a bit for it. It's sad that the effort had to come on a night when the Blazers were down double-digits for most of the game. Perhaps he'll stay on a roll for the next few days. The Blazers need it. Like Aldridge he went 10-17 with 3 of 6 three-pointers made for a game-high 24 points. He also had 5 assists and 3 rebounds. At times he made the Orlando commentators physically ill tonight.
Gerald Wallace played well in spurts, his main crimes being the same semi-slowness that affected his teammates on defense and missing a few painfully-open three-pointers. He was as devastating as usual when he was on, though. He made the most of several drives to the bucket and helped key that late-game trapping defense. 6-12 shooting, 4 rebounds, 5 assists, 3 steals.
Wesley Matthews also helped in the late trap and shot well tonight, going 7-13 (2-7 on threes) for 17 points. Ditto the defensive comments for everyone else.
If everybody else looked slow early on, Raymond Felton looked like a glacier. His shot was off, his layups were off, his defense was off...you name it. People say he's "back in shape" but I don't know...at least not in back-to-back kind of shape. On the up side he did have 8 assists. Otherwise 2-11 shooting, 7 points, 2 rebounds.
Marcus Camby picked up 2 quick fouls trying to guard Howard, picked up a third not long after being re-inserted, and mostly looked like he'd rather be anywhere but here tonight. That's not a knock on him. He's older than Methuselah, this was a back-to-back, he played 35 minutes last night, and that's Dwight Howard over there. Camby had 13 minutes, 3 fouls, 2 turnovers, 4 rebounds, and an assist.
Nicolas Batum was the only Blazer besides Crawford who had a good, active game even before the fourth-quarter rally. He looked fresh as a daisy and at least moderately effective. He played 35 minutes, went 4-8 from the field, 2-3 from the arc, scored 14, and added 3 offensive rebounds and 2 assists.
Kurt Thomas played 12 minutes and provided 3 rebounds. Neither trying to keep huge men out of the post by himself nor chasing after agile three-point shooters describes his game at this point.
Both Craig Smith and Luke Babbit got a short look. Smith 0-fered the stat line in 3 minutes save for a missed shot and a foul. Babbitt managed 3 rebounds and missed a very long three from up top in his 4 minutes.
Fun With Numbers
- The Blazers won't often shoot 40% from three-point range and lose. That's what they did tonight. They went 10-25. The thing was, the Magic went 16-27 for 59% shooting. Yes, that's from the three...point...arc. Most post guys don't shoot that well from point blank range. The Blazers were like a good high school pianist giving a recital at a Liberace concert. They had the notes but the Magic brought those AND the candelabra AND the sequined robes AND plenty of pinkie rings.
- After a bad start the Blazers ended up with an impressive 48% shooting percentage. Again, though, the Magic trumped them, approaching 59%.
- Only 6 fast break points for Portland tonight. Orlando won that battle.
- Only 13 free throws for the Blazers too. But the Magic shot only 19 and some of those were end-game intentional.
- The Blazers did win the turnover battle, forcing 18 and committing only 7. That was a large part of the narrow margin.
- The Magic limited the Blazers to only 7 offensive rebound though. That's one more category that just wasn't quite enough.
Final Thoughts
A loss tonight wasn't surprising, nor was the fashion in which it came. The bright spot, of course, will be the comeback. But that won't mean anything if the Blazers can't back up the hope with wins on the road. They got the Clippers win for insurance. They spent it before they even got on the plane by losing to the Magic. Now they need to prove they can win at a good rate away from home. That's one thing about this season...the next test is just around the corner and they never stop.
Orlando Pinstriped Post will let you know what it was like to win this game six times and then almost lose it.
Magic vs Trail Blazers boxscore
Your Jersey Contest scoreboard for the month is here. Don't forget you can see individual game results by scrolling down to the menu at the bottom. The form for Friday's game is here.
--Dave (blazersub@gmail.com)
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yeah, Orlando gets credit for making so many 3's.
Blazers get credit for leaving them WIDE OPEN.
/s
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Jan 11, 2012 11:09 PM PST reply actions
That's not entirely new
but it was both worse tonight and the consequences more pronounced. But really for the bulk of the game the entire defense was worse tonight. Having Howard on the floor did have something to do with that. But the Blazers also played really bad “D” when they weren’t playing good “D”.
—Dave
We just got tired of watching them run the lay-up drill, so we gave them 3-pt shots.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 11, 2012 11:23 PM PST up reply actions
The Blazers just keep falling behind early and try to make a miracle come back. The mentality of being aggressive just isn't
there every night. We need better leader ship at the guard position.
it would be nice if we got our game going in the first quarter for once
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 12, 2012 3:45 AM PST up reply actions
Honestly I'd have rather played Miami
Although I think the Blazers’ tardiness to the game would have doomed them either way. But I’m hard-pressed to think of a team that’s a worse matchup against Portland’s current lineup than this one.
—Dave
Regarding the lineup, I think that Kurt Thomas should've started at center instead of Marcus Camby.
That was never going to happen, though.
"I Am Mine"
This game, shoulda been LMA starting at center
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 12, 2012 12:10 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Should have been
Chris johnson starting. Heres why:
1. Hes fresh, hasnt played much at all this season.
2. Extreme shot blocker, when anderson made that easy layup im pretty sure CJ woulda batted it out of bounds. Same with those easy layups.
3. Sure he does pickup fouls quick but really with his D and quickness I think it equals out
4. Hes determined to prove himself, who better to do that against than the leagues best center? Thats some big motivation if u ask me.
5. Hes skinny I mean ya see him? He could probably sell fouls against dwight easily!
6. If we started CJ the magic players and coaching staff would have flipped, they probably know little to nothing about him and woulda thought camby was down or something making the relax even more.
Im actually disappointes I saw niether him or nolan smith who nate said after last nights game would be seeing minutes. ON THE BRIGHT SIDE I think we can all agree babbit didnt mess stuff up a ton? Normally I hate B-Rabbit but tonight he looked not crappy for a rookie. He was down low boxing out and trying for rebounds. Kid just needs to learn to use his butt to box out.
Formally known as: My_name_a_rudy
by Blaze_that_trail on Jan 12, 2012 12:52 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Chris Johnson would've been like a lamb led to slaughter.
To this day, Johnson has no business being on a NBA roster.
"I Am Mine"
Start someone slimmer than Camby?
vs Howard? You need strength against that guy. You got to go the other way, stronger, not more agile.
Nope, Kurt Thomas.
That’d be like what Atlanta did by starting Jason Collins in the playoffs against Orlando last year.
LMA would be on Ryan Anderson. Just like how Atlanta put Al Horford on Brandon Bass last year.
"I Am Mine"
honestly wouldn't have minded Craig starting at C either
I know he he kind of short, but he is probably our most physical big. He could have tried to get under Dwights skin early.
Heh i just typed that.
Though he didn’t handle Davis that impressivly …
Pregame I wondered if Smith would have been able to play spot min v Howard
Seeing how he didn’t win the position battle with Davis, though, I doubt he would have been able to keep Howard off the low block. I agree though, this is likely Camby;’s worst type of matchup.
After watching tonight vs Davis
I agree he can’t help vs Howard.
Yeah, Craig Smith is overmatched against even average-sized bigs like Davis.
He’s just a bad defender.
"I Am Mine"
Agree totally.
Felton, Batum, Matthews, Wallace, Aldridge starting with Crawford replacing Felton to finish…
#7
Wallace is too inconsistent.
Where he was during the first half?And obviously the team develops some kind dependence of his performance.
Felton has not been that impressive for the Blazers this season.
Either he is still out of shape.
He lost confidence in his shot.
Does not know how to play with the players he has.
I am losing faith in him as the season wears on
You think? He went 2-11 tonight, but the good news is that he raised his 3-pt shooting to 16.7%
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 11, 2012 11:26 PM PST up reply actions
What were his stats last game
against the clips? I missed that box score.
Another moment of silence for the running game. RIP - 13 points total in 2 games.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 11, 2012 11:22 PM PST reply actions
Very good night for Batum - but unfortunate last foul with 28 secs ended the comeback.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 11, 2012 11:29 PM PST reply actions
if only Batum had thrown a French punch* at Richardson
rather than an innocent hand across Richardon’s shoulder/ cheek.
*a French punch is a kiss on the cheek
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 12, 2012 3:50 AM PST up reply actions
Shoulda signed Pryzbilla
Just to play 3 games against Bynum and 1 against Howard. Then he could just hang out the other 62 games.
No news on Przy is not good news.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 11, 2012 11:33 PM PST up reply actions
He's in China
While I’m all for optimization, I’m not sure improving that 10th spot is the big diff here. ;)
better some semblance of hope
than him straight out saying he’s retiring.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all."
by thankyouforblaze on Jan 12, 2012 3:50 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah, but if he decided to play at all this year I think we would have heard rumbling by now.
If he was coming back to PDX I think Mike Barrett would be saying something (just a little hint). They are very good friends. I’ve noticed Mike Rice bring up Joel’s name in each of their last 3 game telecasts, sort of baiting Barrett to say something. But so far Barrett hasn’t responded at all.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 12, 2012 11:43 AM PST up reply actions
Dave : Do you think the Blazers should have gone to the Hack-A-Howard in the 4th when they were coming back?
Before the 2 minute mark they were down only 5 and could have on many occasions in the 4th hacked Howard and he shot only 3-12 on free throws for the night. Why don’t more teams do this with bad free throwers when trying to come back when it is a legal rule up til the 2 minute mark in the 4th. Send Kurt Thomas out there in the 4th and Hack Howard and Blazers win this game.
I think they did well
until the Batum foul. And to be fair, that wasn’t necessarily Batum’s fault. Fouls like that are going to happen when you’re playing that aggressively. They had the Magic right where they wanted them…maybe a single point shy but close enough. Had they gotten one more clean stop—not even a turnover but a stop—they would have had a chance. They put themselves in exactly the right position but came up one defensive play short when they got there. I don’t think I would have done anything differently except consider calling off the trap on that three-points-up possession.
—Dave
Don't be too sure about that. I believe there were after the last lockout.
I’d have to look it up, but I think I recall first round back-to-backs.
"You're not too smart, are you? I like that in a man." - Matty Walker in Body Heat (1981)
by BlazerFanSince1970 on Jan 12, 2012 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
This game felt like playoff losses
Remember when Phoenix just couldn’t miss from 3? And the worst part is Jason Richardson is a part of the opposition.
Also on a separate note, I hate seeing turkaglu succeed in the clutch, one too many times at the RG.
by JMLakaShotCaller on Jan 11, 2012 11:33 PM PST via mobile reply actions
One big dif vs those games
Richardson wasn’t abusing our guards in the post. He did get away on the dribble/cut a few times for point break shots, which isn’t good. However he wasn’t posting Batum and co. like he abused Rudy.
These boyz like cabaret
This is my signature. Do you like it?
Really looking like back to backs are going to be a serious issue for us
Doesn’t bode well for the future. If the guys could just find a way to get it in gear and play at least half decently until the 4th quarter we could manage until the playoffs.
As it is it’s like they don’t even belong on the court until they inexplicably decide they want to win, some time in the 4th quarter. They then expend a huge amount of energy in these efforts that ultimately fall short because they start too late and really just don’t deserve to win.
Good news is we did see a lot of this last season too and we still finished with 48 wins. Bad news is the schedule is much more harsh this season.
As you saw tonight, Portland's 3PT defense to start the season was unsustainable.
Regression to the mean can be painful.
"I Am Mine"
This wasn't regression to the mean
it was just mean.
But do keep in mind that the Magic are set up to do exactly this. I’d be completely comfortable with several other teams shooting those same shots…delighted in fact. Portland should have covered better, to be sure, and will on many nights. This was not exactly Portland’s average defensive effort. But even if this went unchanged, I’ll take teams attempting 27 threes any time.
—Dave
"But even if this went unchanged, I’ll take teams attempting 27 threes any time."
I’d rather have opponents take long 2s than shoot 3s. The 3PT shot is the game’s most underrated.
"I Am Mine"
Sure, long 2's are the worst
But how are you going to force the long 2’s? You have to run the shooters off the wide open catch&shoots, which really didn’t happen much tonight.
On a tangent, I think LMA, specifically on the baseline pick&pot, should be instructed to step back and take the baseline 3 instead of the long 2.
This.
Didn’t they run an end-game play in one of their other close losses where they set LMA up for the coffin corner 3? I don’t want LMA to fall in love with the 3, but I think certain types of 3pt shots should be in his arsenal of options.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 12, 2012 12:58 PM PST up reply actions
You have to consider the oppponent
Magic surround Howard with, at many times, all 4 other players comfortable, and looking, for the 3 pt shot. How many other teams can say that?
There is likely an adjusted fg/eFG/3pt% that shows how you do relative to the opponents averages. Obv Magic shot great, in part due to Portland’s lack of effective close-outs, but few teams could have taken advantage like this.
Orlando is 4th in the league in 3PT shooting...
so I think this was to be expected. I would have rather taken our chances with not double teaming Howard and staying with the shooters. Oh, and maybe make an effort at stopping the guy curling off the pick to basket for wide open layups over and over again…
#7
Who do I talk to about getting this stupid chrispaul add off my screen
that guy makes me sick, he is like the T.O. of the NBA- straight up diva crybaby
doesnts flop city have a site of their own that they can post this blog-vomit on?
La Illaha Illallah Muhamadur Rasulallah
AdBlock Plus for Chrome is a lie.
The APIs for Chrome plugins allow UI changes but not the same kinds of low-level behavioral changes that Firefox does. The end result is that you don’t SEE the ads, but Chrome still downloads them. So aesthetically you get the benefit, but you still expose yourself to tracking cookies, web bugs, and other forms of lightweight spyware that accompany ads.
And FWIW, my Firefox doesn’t strip the background graphics that SBN pipes into the margins sometimes. I may have the wrong domain whitelisted.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 12, 2012 1:01 PM PST up reply actions
Even playing sad perimeter
defense against a top team and we only lose by 3…I wouldn’t get too sad about this one.
Honestly, the Blazers have shown that they’re good enough to win games or at least be very competitive without having to have everything go perfectly. That’s the mark of a top team. Suns game excepted.
by jamon51 on Jan 12, 2012 12:13 AM PST via Android app reply actions
Felt like a scheme issue tonight, at least in part
Orlando is obvious in its intentions – work through Howard in the post – kick out for threes.
However, Orland early on was screening for threes – not trying to go through Howard at all. Ironically, playing for threes opened up lanes to the hoop. By the time the Blazers adjusted, the lead was just too much to overcome.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
superstar calls?
on multiple occasions, it appeared to me that howard went up for a shot, decided against it, and made a last second pass…. after his feet hit the ground. and the refs never called it. does this happen all the time in the nba, and i’m just starting to notice? that’s an extremely unfair advantage (defenders would have committed 100% to blocking out under the basket) and may have accounted for some of the wide-open threes the Tragics were able to get.
Dwight has a past history of foul trouble.
So I’m not inclined to point to conspiracy theories in this case, my nick notwithstanding.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 12, 2012 1:02 PM PST up reply actions
Batum had a +17
And the foul that was called on him at the end was completely ridiculous. If you watched the replay he never even touched Richardson’s face.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Jan 12, 2012 7:51 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Ugh!
The word is out around the NBA. You can jump on the Blazers early and they won’t recover. They either aren’t ready to play,
they aren’t as quick as we think. or they’re being really unprofessional. Either way, I don’t like the way this team get knocked around.
The word is out...
you better jump on the Blazers early and hope they don’t recover because once they get focused they play lights out and in a dominating fashion…
While I dislike the slow starts, you got to give them credit for fighting back to get in this game (and same with the loss to the Clips). We’ve been down in a couple of wins as well but seem pretty capable of grinding our way back into it.
#7
Well, this team doesn't get knocked around
but they went under a lot of screens to start the game – and that killed them
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Jan 12, 2012 9:39 AM PST up reply actions
Fair enough hypothesis, except for one thing...
What team isn’t supposed to jump on their opponents early? Somehow I don’t see Thibs or anyone else telling their team to “hold back” in the 1st quarter so save their energy for the closing minutes.
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
by conspirator5 on Jan 12, 2012 1:04 PM PST up reply actions
It's early and they will work it out eventually
but really it’s inexcusable.
a question for you Dave
Dave, what is a shoot around. I know teams do this the day of games, but what takes place?
Ben's there so he would be a better person to answer
Running through the game plan is the general idea.
—Dave
Basketball + science!
All the planets of the Solar System orbit in a counter-clockwise direction as viewed from above the Sun’s north pole: most planets also rotate counter-clockwise but Venus rotates clockwise (called “retrograde” rotation) once every 243 Earth days—by far the slowest rotation period of any major planet.
via wikipedia

by 
































