Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

The History of the Portland Trail Blazers: The Post-Finals Decline

If you've missed any of our historical retrospectives so far, you can find them here:  1976-77  1977-78  1979-1983  1984-86  1987-89 1989-90 and 1991-92

----------------------------------------

When we last left our tour of Portland Trail Blazers memories the guys in black and red had just completed the best three-year stretch in their history.  Clyde Drexler, Terry Porter, Jerome Kersey, Buck Williams, and Kevin Duckworth had bulldozed their way to two NBA Finals in three years, winning 63 regular-season games in the season they didn't make the finals series.  Unfortunately the team had come up short in each Finals visit, losing to the Detroit Pistons in 1990 and the Chicago Bulls in 1992.  Even the most diehard Blazers fans were wondering if the stars would ever align for this team.

The summer of 1992 saw a couple of significant changes.  Danny Ainge, brought on board for experience and versatile guard play, departed for the Phoenix Suns.  Portland replaced him with Golden State veteran Mario Elie.  More importantly they reached out into the market to snag coveted point guard Rod Strickland, lately of the San Antonio Spurs.  Like the first leaf falling in autumn, Strickland's signing into a now-crowded backcourt foreshadowed a change in Portland's weather.  They were slipping from their perch as a dominant franchise.  The solution: try to hold it by acquiring extra talent.

The problems with this oft-attempted process are manifold:

  • Great teams excel in the first place because of A-List talent.   Those kind of players are almost never available on the open market via signing or trade.  Despite a stronger-looking lineup overall the peak production of your new squad doesn't equal the peak production of the squad you used to have.
  • Chemistry is usually a key component in title runs.  It can come from a seamless rotation or from having a coupe dominant players with everybody else knowing their role.  One of the classic reasons talented players become available is their lack of chemistry.  Having just signed a shiny, expensive contract, incoming players tend to believe they're prominent, if not central, in the process no matter how that process was working before their arrival..
  • Exacerbating the chemistry issue, you have to choose among the limited pool of players the market provides.  Talent often wins over fit.  You end up with too much of something, unable to wring maximum production out of players, in effect wasting a portion of the theoretical talent increase.
  • The second classic reason talented players go on the market is lack of versatility.  Great offensive or defensive players who can't play on the opposite end of the floor create stress on their own lineup as well as the opponents'.  The pre-existing rotation usually didn't have to deal with, and isn't prepared for, that stress.

All of these factors came into play with the Strickland signing.  Folks around the NBA marveled that Portland was able to acquire yet more talent for nothing but extra cash.  By contrast the first thoughts of many Blazers fans were:  "Wasn't this the guy who cost his team a Game 7 by chucking a stupid pass over his head a couple years ago?" and "Where in the world is he going to play?"  This was a departure from the tried-and-true formula of molding home-grown talent.  After the initial head-scratching and hand-wringing ceased, though, the Blazer faithful got caught up in the excitement.  Maybe one infusion of talent really was enough to make a title possible.

That excitement boiled a little stronger as the Blazers rattled off eight straight wins to start the season.  They hit some bumps afterwards but still managed a 28-11 record by late January.  Portland was propelled by the emergence of forward-center Cliff Robinson.  Known in his two earlier seasons for wild shots and pass drops, Robinson pulled it together in '92-'93, scoring 19 per game with 6.5 rebounds and 2 blocks.  He eased the strain on Buck Williams who, while still formidable, was slowing down every so slightly.  Robinson also provide another nice running target for Strickland.  The latter split the point guard duties with Porter who now slid to off-guard upon occasion. 

The big story of the season, though, became the health of Clyde Drexler.  Chronically bothered by knees, Drexler had to take off long stretches of games during this season, first in January then in March.  Clyde's knees made the Strickland signing make sense.  But even with the high talent level a Strickland-Porter backcourt didn't bring near the intimidation factor of a Porter-Drexler pairing.  The Blazers survived, prospered even against lesser teams, but they couldn't dominate without their Hall of Famer. 

Strickland's skills and shortcomings on the court became crystal clear during his inaugural season with the Blazers.  He was a prescient passer, quick with the dribble, devastating on the run, and could score in the lane.  On the other hand he couldn't hit jumpers consistently and he defended at about the same level as the mid-court logo.  The latter issue became huge when paired with Porter who himself was playing out of position defensively at shooting guard.  No matter which player defended the opponent's point, the other was stuck in a mismatch.  Teams with good backcourts quickly took advantage.

Despite the injury and chemistry issues the Blazers ended the '92-'93 season with a respectable 51-31 record, good for third in the Pacific Division behind the Seattle Supersonics and the 62-win Phoenix Suns.  With the fourth seed in the conference the Blazers had a tough road ahead, first facing fifth-seed San Antonio before a presumed matchup with new conference-mate Charles Barkley and the Suns.  That showdown never took place.  Even with Drexler on the court the Spurs rudely ushered Portland from the post-season, winning the first-round series 3-1.  After three heady years of success, the Blazers were back to their first-round losing ways.

It was time for more moves.

Click through to read about the 1993-94 season and the crumbling of a classic Blazers era accompanied by one of its saddest moments.

Star-divide

The Blazers acquired scoring potential aplenty in the summer of 1993.  They took a shot on James "Hollywood" Robinson in the draft.  He had a point guard's size but a scoring guard's mentality with an array of moves to back it up.  A bit later they traded former first-round pick Alaa Abdelnaby to the Milwaukee Bucks for the rights to UCLA sharpshooter Tracy Murray, a guy who could routinely hit from halfcourt in practice. 

More shockingly, perhaps, the Blazers broke up their former Finals core, sending center Kevin Duckworth to the Washington Bullets for forward Harvey Grant.  Like Strickland, Grant was a talent.  He had averaged over 18 per game as the main man on the Bullets roster for three years straight.  Also like Strickland, Grant had limitations which the Blazers were about to discover.

The Duckworth trade was made possible by the Blazers also acquiring center Chris Dudley, a rebounding, shot-blocking defensive specialist with a Yale degree and the potential to earn a lot more on the open market than the $800,000 the Blazers were paying him.  The mystery to that would be revealed next summer.

On paper the Blazers looked stacked.  They still had Porter, Drexler, and Strickland in the backcourt.  They had Kersey and Grant to score and rebound at small forward, Robinson to fill it up and Williams to rebound at power forward, and Dudley to watch the hoop at center while all of the other players scored away.

Even with all that, the summer of '93 saw tragedy hit the Blazers family.  On June 7th, 1993, sadness swept over Portland with the news that former guard Drazen Petrovic, now a member of the New Jersey Nets, had been killed as a passenger in a car accident on the German Autobahn.  I remember listening to Steve "Dream" Weaver on the newly-minted sports radio station "The Fan" that morning.  I was driving my busted up Toyota to get gas and came in during the middle of the story.  It was evident by the tone that something awful had happened but the radio crew went a long time without mentioning an actual name.  I had to piece together information from the conversation:  former Blazer, young, beloved when he was here.  When they started talking about the lack of speed limits and being able to drive however fast you wanted I immediately thought of the Autobahn and then I said, "Oh no.  Not Drazen."  They still hadn't completed the story when I reached the gas station.  My alternator wouldn't take the radio playing without the engine so instead of pulling up to the pump I parked at the side of the lot and kept the car running to listen.  Seconds later they recapped the whole story.  Drazen Petrovic, dead at 28.  I immediately flashed back to the joyous abandon with which Petro played even when he was chronically out of position and in trouble with his coach.  I had the good fortune to sit exactly behind him, in a direct line with him and the bucket, as he was warming up shooting threes before a game. Never have I seen such a display of shooting before or since.  The ball literally never left the line.  No left...no right...not a millimeter.  It went true every time.  I used to think, as all of us do in our youth, that maybe I could have played ball at a higher level if I were just a little taller, a little quicker.  I had some skills and I had a shot.  Watching Drazen--a guy about my size--shoot in warmups that night cured me of that illusion forever.  On my best day I never shot like that.  If I shot 10 for 10 from the arc they wouldn't have looked like that though every one went in.  Drazen had put me in my place and I loved him for it.  I held a pit in my stomach for days after hearing about his death.  He was traded from the Blazers too soon and left this life too soon.  That will forever be his legacy in Portland.

Even so, there were games to be played the next fall.  Some things went really right.  Cliff Robinson topped 20 per game, becoming the central scorer on the team.  Strickland had a fantastic year at 17 with 9 assists.  Drexler managed 68 games, his only serious time off coming in January.  Several things went really wrong too.  Chief among them, Chris Dudley played but 28 games forcing Robinson to man the center position.  Though he scored well and played with mobility, though he was bolstered by the last great effort of Buck Williams as a Blazer (10.4 rpg this season), Cliff couldn't stem the team's defensive shortcomings.  The master plan revolved around Dudley as the Big Stopper in the middle and everyone else scoring freely.  Instead Robinson scored freely, everyone else's scoring suffered, and nobody stopped the ball on the other end.  Strickland and Porter still hadn't settled who would start at point.  Porter's production plummeted, a victim of poor shooting, an aging body, and discontent.  By the end of the season he had become a three-point specialist, not much more.   Kersey became a complete non-factor, playing fewer than 17 minutes per game.  Grant was a bust in his place, barely scoring over 10.  Drexler, accustomed to shooting above 48%, shot less than 43% for the season.  Nobody but Porter and rookie Murray could hit a three-point shot. 

Portland finished the '93-'94 season at 47-35, losing their first-round series in all-too-familiar 3-1 fashion to the Houston Rockets.  The Blazers had talent but yesterday's foreshadowing had become today's reality.  Too many of the new players were overrated, unable to function without being the focal point of the team, unable to defend, or unable to fit together as a cohesive unit.  Too many of the old guard were hurt or grumpy about getting pushed out of playing time by the new guys.  The Blazers were a red hot mess.

The first casualty of the disappointing season was coach Rick Adelman.  He walked away with 291 wins in five seasons and change, leaving behind a team in serious transition.  With him went General Manager Geoff Petrie, credited for many of the great decisions of the Drexler ascension and many of the less-great ones during the decline.  

Bidding adieu to even more of the keys to their early-90's Finals runs was only the initial move of the Blazers '94-'95 season though.  Sweeping changes were on the horizon.  A new sheriff was coming to town and respecting tradition wasn't one of his strong points.

Next Up:  The Whitsitt Era begins.

As always, share your memories of these years, teams, and players below.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 17 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting

A power forward playing center and being the only real scoring option. Sounds too familiar. Although the current team has some good scorers it seemed that during this past season alot of those options werent following through. I just hope that this year will be different.

by L.A.B on Jul 25, 2011 6:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Chronically bothered by knees, Drexler had to take off long stretches of games during this season, first in January then in March.

That sounds familiar.

by KD1 on Jul 25, 2011 7:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Oh, Drazen

I had moved to New York / New Jersey by this time, and gone to my share of Hapless Nets games. (That was the team’s name in those days.) When Petrovic got here, he absolutely lit a fire under that team, and he was The Man here much more than he ever was in Portland.

I was lucky enough to go to one of their playoff wins against Cleveland, and Petrovic was unstoppable — he was bombing from all over the court, and whipping the crowd up during timeouts. (A crowd which hadn’t even been showing up to games a year earlier. The arena was kind of in disbelief, like, “Hey, um, we appear to be in the playoffs and we might actually win a playoff game. OMG! We are supposed to make some noise now!”) I think it was his best and happiest time in the NBA.

I worked for a newspaper here when we heard a rumor that he had died in a crash in Germany. It was nighttime right before deadline, and we didn’t have enough information to get it in the next day’s paper. So having studied two years of German in college, which was better than everybody else who had studied zero years of German in college, I called the AP in Germany. They were gone for the night but their recording did give another number, which I called. Some guy who was asleep answered the phone.

Me: “Hello, is here the AP?”
Him: “Nein, this is [name of guy].”
Me: “Oh, sorry, because I am called up to the AP and given was this number.”
Him: “Yes, I work for the AP but it is closed.”
Me: “We hear that an Americanish basketballman has in Germany deaded.”
Him: “I don’t know. It is 3 in the morning.”

So when I think of Drazen, I mostly think of his total joy on the court and how he helped breathe life into a team that had no spirit and turned the lousiest fans in the NBA on to good basketball. He was just a fun, happy player.

by Kaboomm on Jul 25, 2011 7:22 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Decline

   Sometimes when decline is happening it’s so incremental you don’t notice it. I think I realized as Dave points out, that the addition of Rod Strickland and Mario Ellie signaled some type of change, but as an optimistic fan at the time, you do hope that it’s a positive and not a negative.

   IMO this was still a very good team, Mario Ellie and Rod Strickland were both good players. I think Strickland was in his prime and one of the best PG’s in the league at the time. He seemed able to get to the basket and score at will.

  An interesting comparative point in Daves’ bullet points:

Great teams excel in the first place because of A-List talent. Those kind of players are almost never available on the open market via signing or trade. Despite a stronger-looking lineup overall the peak production of your new squad doesn’t equal the peak production of the squad you used to have.-Dave

  I agree with this. And to an extent it’s something that bothers me about this current team and the approach The Blazers seem to be applying to building.

  Right now, you hear from McMillan that he want’s “players in their primes”. That seems to be the managerial battle cry of roster building right now. Not young, not old…but players in their prime.

  Well if you believe Dave’s bullet point…then you have to have doubts about it working. Truth is this current incarnation of The Blazers isn’t as good as the early 90’s incarnation of The Blazers…and trying to keep it afloat by getting available “players in their prime” didn’t work with that incarnation, I sincerely doubt it will work with this incarnation. In other words, if adding players like Rod Strickland and Mario Ellie to Porter, Drexler, Buck, Duck and Kersey wasn’t enough to keep that team championship viable…then what makes this current incarnation of The Blazers think adding players like Wes Matthews and Raymond Felton will make up for the decline or loss of players like Brandon Roy or Oden? I think the danger of “adding players in their prime” to a team that isn’t already a championship contender is that you can end up making tread water, or sideways additions. You might not get much worse….but you won’t be getting much better.

  Only time will tell, but I think Raymond Felton would have to really establish himself at a higher level, really break into the upper echelon of PG’s for the Andre Miller for Felton trade to be much more than a sideways or tread water move. I see Felton as younger, perhaps viable for longer, and possesing slightly different skills, but I don’t see him as being significantly “better” than Andre Miller.

   We might be evaluating a “past” team that was in slow decline…and a period when management desperately tried to continue the run with a great nuculeus…vs. Today, when I think we’ve had a somewhat derailed team in assension. But it seems to me the managerial reaction is somewhat similar…sideways, tread water moves. Unless you are right at the top? Then long term I don’t think it works. Adding Wes Matthews, trading out for Felton, adding Gerald Wallace…can all keep you about where you were before the decline of Brandon Roy and the derailment of Oden….but is it really going to improve you?

That’s why I think The Blazers are still so forced in hoping they can keep Oden and also hoping he can become a dominating player. Oden is the talent that if realized “isn’t” a tread water addition.

Sometimes you get suprised. Wes Matthews wasn’t 100% last season and he is still young. Perhaps we are getting Raymond Felton at exactly the right time, perhaps he is at the stage where he really is capable of establishing himself at a higher level. Maybe Batum continues to improve? In short, maybe we aren’t treading water. But if you believe as Dave say’s “Great teams excel in the first place because of A-List talent. Those kind of players are almost never available on the open market via signing or trade.” then the current philosophy of The Blazers of trying to add available players “in their primes” I think is doomed to keep us at about where we are…and is that good enough?

PS.
   I liked Dave saying we traded Drazen Petrovich too soon. I’ve always felt that. I know it was reported that Drazen was unhappy with his bench role, but I always loved the Drexler/Petrovich combo…I thought that was an almost historically devastating pairing. No knock on Danny Ainge, who played well for us…but I’d of rather never obtained Ainge and kept Petrovich. As short lived as the Drexler/Drazen combo at the 2 guard experiment was? I thought it was fantastic. Teams feared it. You could work to slow down Drexler, you could throw a lot of energy at trying to stop him…but when he sat down and Drazen popped up? You could almost hear the groan from the opposing team. I thought with Porter, Drexler and Drazen we had the best rotation of guards since Thomas, Dumars and Vinnie Johnson….I wish we had kept Drazen.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 25, 2011 10:28 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

What I don't understand

(good post btw) is why Drexler couldn’t have played SF while Petrovich started at SG. Bring Kersey off the bench as a dynamo bench guy. Maybe someone more familiar with that era could enlighten me why that wasn’t possible.

by jamon51 on Jul 25, 2011 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think it would have helped

Defense would be the big issue. The Finals Years Blazers had great defensive numbers. People underestimate how important the duo of Williams and Kersey were in that respect. Clyde and Terry got plenty of retroactive credit for being decent defenders but the truth is that before Williams came they were mediocre at best. Duckworth was big enough to take space but wasn’t exactly a prized defender either. The athleticism and toughness of those two forwards made this team defensively. They allowed Clyde, Terry, and Duck to use their respective, more limited, defensive skills to best effect.

Now take out Jerome and substitute in a gimpy Drexler. Drazen Petrovic, as much as I loved him, was less than nothing on defense…worse than Strickland even. Porter was smart enough but wasn’t shutting down people by himself and Duck is still your center. Now you’re leaning only on Williams, himself starting to show the signs of a high-mileage body, and perhaps on-again, off-again Cliff Robinson to cover for everybody. Keeping in mind that backcourt would need a ton of covering for, that just wasn’t going to happen.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 25, 2011 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

But Dave....

….I think your arguement that in that specific situation Drazen “may” of been a defensive liability valid. BUT…you say above that Drazen was traded too soon….

   In my memory, Drazen was one of those high energy offensive players whose offense became his defense. Most players guarding Drazen became limited themselves offensively simply because it took so much energy to try to keep up with Drazen.

  Bottom line to me? I think Drazen was an emerging talent of such great scope that it was a mistake for The Blazers to trade him. I think ideally, you find a way to keep him. I felt at the time that his trade was based more on the fact that The Blazers felt they had enough talent to absorb his departure and Drazen was rumored to be increasingly unhappy with a back-up role.

  Speculate an alternative universe where The Blazers keep Petrovich…then as Kersey and Drexler and the great, great nuculeus of that 90’s team continues to slowly age and decline, you have more options with a younger talented Drazen Petrovich on the roster. In a short time when the Drexler era officially ended, it was a long, long time…before The Blazers found a talent near as good as Petrovich to fill the void left by Drexlers departure.

  I agree that Drazen wasn’t a great defender….but he was such a scrappy high energy player that I don’t remember him being that bad…he was a “Cornered Terrier” type of competitor…I never felt uneasy about Drazen on the court. Tragedy cut his life and career short…but his star was still emerging in New Jersey. I’m not convinced that Drazen may of been capable of eventual multiple All-Star appearances…and IMO that means that I agree with your original statement…we traded him too soon.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Jul 25, 2011 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

The thing I remember about Strickland was

his attempt to dunk one game (couldn’t tell you when or who we played), but he got completely rim-checked. Rejected by the rim in humiliating fashion. It was embarrassing.

And it became a joke to me and my friends, who as kids played lots of basketball and tried to dunk on the 7 1/2’ hoop, that when we hit nothing but rim we’d yell out “Oooooh, Rod Strickland!”

Blazers win!

by The X-man on Jul 25, 2011 2:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Would have been really good if...

Sabonis had come over sooner in his career. He was making good money in Spain and quite popular, but the main reason was he was afraid that the NBA would be too physical and fast. He was partly correct, but I’m sure he regrets not coming over sooner.

The Blazers are typical of teams that got close but no cigar. Still good, but not getting better. You need to catch a break of either a nugget in the rough or a great trade.

Neither happened.

by ralphzillo on Jul 25, 2011 4:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Hmm, this era doesn't seem to have garnered much discussion.

In retrospect, that must’ve been a dull, nondescript time—especially since there’s such little reminiscing over it.

"I Am Mine"

by AK1984 on Jul 26, 2011 1:27 AM PDT reply actions  

It was the anti-climax era

The team wasn’t as exciting as the previous few years and it didn’t completely crash and burn. There wasn’t an intense emotional attachment.

"At 49, I can say something I never would have said when I was a player, that I'm a better person because of my failures and disgraces." -- Bill Walton

by MischiefPortland on Jul 26, 2011 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why no mention of the Salt Lake scandal?

I remember the 93 season collapsing after the Salt Lake scandal. Jerome Kersey and a couple of rookies took some underaged girls up to their rooms. The legal need not to say anything publicly, however, initially enabled rumors to abound about who was involved and what happened. The team was never the same again.

by AlabamaBlazer on Jul 27, 2011 10:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Junkless Proposition - Five-Two-Six-Two-Aught-onetwo.
Small
Consensus Mock Draft
Photo_3__small
JD 5/22
Bns_small
You're The GM. Whats your move?
Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.

Recent FanPosts

Small
My dream is the Blazers signing Jeremy Lin
Small
Would you do this trade? Lowry, Okafor, #4?
Small
Keep an Eye on Great Britain
Small
two options with $20 mill cap space, the #6 pick and some luck
Batum_small
Alternate 2012 Olympics Team
Small
Collective mock draft
Small
GM Poll: K Love or L Train
Small
Off season ideas

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Assistant Michael Malone interested in the Blazers
The LeBron James Conundrum: A Legacy In Question
Shooting percentages as they apply to certain areas of the court.  Note who one of the best shooters in the NBA from the wing is.  Check out the guy dominating under the hoop as well.  Pretty impressive for a 6'9'' guy.
Fernandez: Joel Freeland Faces July 10 Deadline For Contract Buyout
Church of Basketball: An Interview With Dave

Recent FanShots

Perry Jones III story
Jalen Rose on D'Antoni
Isiah Thomas hoping for return
Ferry in mix for vacant Portland GM job
Where's The GM?
Orlando Magic has decided to trade Dwight Howard
If the Sixers are eliminated by the Boston Celtics in Game 7, the general...
Interesting Quotation from Chad Ford RE: Morway and Rebuilding
Malone is a winner...
Lamarcus aldridge first nba game

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm