Game 80 Recap: Trail Blazers 93, Lakers 86
In a Nutshell
Ever hit a raccoon with your pickup and then feel bad about it? That's what Portland did to L.A. tonight, minus the feeling bad part. The Blazers ran the Lakers out of the gym for the first two and a half quarters, fast-breaking and alley-ooping their way to a 24-point lead. When the tempo slowed the lead diminished but Portland withstood L.A.'s three-point shooting and more importantly their physicality, shoving back every time the Lakers tried to take them out of the game and manning up for a victory more decisive than the score would indicate.
Game Flow
The Blazers feasted on turnovers and fast breaks in the first quarter, giving the Lakers a heaping helping of tonight's game plan on a red hot platter. Portland notched 10 fast break points in the opening period alone. Meanwhile the Lakers could not get on track, missing multiple shots. Kobe Bryant looked sick (and not in the good way). Pau Gasol and Ron Artest compiled most of L.A.'s points. As expected the Lakers responded to Portland's tempo rush with big-man rebounding, scoring 7 second-chance points in the quarter. Everything evened out 21-21 at the horn.
The key word describing the second period was LOB. You think I'm talking about alley-oops, right? Sort of. Mostly I'm describing the Lakers on defense, namely Lazy Old [Archaic Word for Offspring of Dubious Legacy]. Portland sent spinners and cutters into the lane and their defenders weren't even in the camera shot. I swear once LaMarcus Aldridge whirled around Gasol from the post and Gasol maybe turned his head to watch the dunk...maybe. Portland dribblers feasted on incisive passes to the rim. Aldridge, Wesley Matthews, Gerald Wallace...if they were any closer to the cup they'd be coffee. Splash in a couple of Portland threes and some late-period deep jumpers from Aldridge and you have a 32-point period for Portland. The only thing that saved the Lakers was a run of four three-pointers late by Kobe. That gave them 26 and Portland led by 6, 53-47, at the half.
You might think that having lost three in a row and making claim to being the best team in the league--plus having a little chip on their shoulders about the Blazers--L.A. would have come out determined and on fire to start the third. You would be thinking wrong. Instead the Blazers started running like dime store pantyhose, assaulting the Lakers with quick shot after quick shot. The Blazers made 7 field goals in the quarter. Exactly one came from beyond 10 feet. With 3:45 left in the quarter the Blazers had scored 21 points the Lakers 3. Sadly Portland's second unit slowed down and then couldn't hit open threes (of which they took many) to save their lives, leading to L.A. run-outs. The Lakers turned the tables and cut a dozen off of the lead, finishing the quarter down 12, 74-62.
Unable to persevere by talent or game plan, L.A. decided to pull a veteran trick and get physical with the Blazers in the fourth. Lamar Odom and Ron Artest led the charge, throwing elbows, knees, headlocks...anything to take the Blazers out of rhythm. Since Portland was already playing stall ball the physical play had the maximum chance to succeed. The game got ugly, fast. However Artest went barking up the wrong Redwood, employing most of his spastic chicanery against Gerald Wallace. Artest is a like a pit bull when he gets going: big, strong, menacing, persistent. Wallace, on the other hand, is Godzilla. He took everything sent his way from Crazy Ronnie's House of Pain, calmly sank free throw after free throw courtesy of the foolishness, and continued to grab rebounds and attack like a beast. Net effect? Zero. Portland fans remember all too well when Artest looked like a pit bull among poodles and offered their appreciation to #3 with an enormous "Ger-ald Wal-lace" chant midway through the period. The Blazers didn't exactly play poetically in the quarter but when Nicolas Batum hit a dagger three to put L.A. down 10 with 1:45 left the lead was safe. Portland look an ugly, somewhat underhanded shot from a struggling-yet-vain team, turned them around, kicked their posteriors, and sent them packing. Blazers 93, Lakers 86. Ballgame.
Notable Developments
The response to L.A.'s physicality may have been the most significant thing to come out of this game. The running attack was great but the playoffs are unlikely to yield as many opportunities as the pondering, listless Laker defense did tonight. The post-season will involve plenty of blue collar, black eye moments though, particularly if the Blazers have the temerity to play above themselves and actually challenge. It's good to see that the Blazers can take it, even if it's just for one game. Long-time observers will say, "Finally!" All it takes is a couple players to make the attitude shift and the rest of the team follows. The Blazers now have those players.
Individual Notes
LaMarcus Aldridge's offense was either lob or jumper tonight but that's appropriate against a bigger team. He drew defenders out of the lane and either stroked it over them or streaked by them for the flush. He went 10-19 for 24 points. More importantly in the absence of Marcus Camby he grabbed 11 rebounds and tallied 4 blocks, including a couple out of a horrible scrum down low involving seemingly half of the players on the floor late in the game when the Lakers were trying to surge back into it. He was LaMarvelous out there tonight...just what the Blazers needed in this situation.
Gerald Wallace was critical to this win because Gerald Wallace doesn't take crap from anyone. And not only that, Gerald Wallace has the talent to back up that crap rejection with actual damage to the other team. Gerald Wallace scored 19 tonight. Gerald Wallace got to the line 10 times and has the bruises to prove it. Gerald Wallace drew the 6th foul on Andrew Bynum taking a charge right after Gerald Wallace had been clubbed by Bynum on the other end with no whistle. Gerald Wallace also had a team-high 13 rebounds. Gerald Wallace also dished 7 assists. Gerald Wallace also played point forward late in the game when the Blazers needed to switch it up and combat the Laker pressure. You don't get to use pronouns tonight. Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome.
Nicolas Batum was doing everything hoped for in this game too before he sprained his ankle early in the third period and left for the locker room. He came back to play late so it's not a crisis but it did derail his otherwise spectacular evening. He ended up 6-12 for 14 points and 4 rebounds. He was so quick that none of the Lakers could stop him.
Wesley Matthews shot 7-11, 2-5 from distance for 18 points. He also made Kobe Bryant work for his buckets, something that Kobe Bryant did not care to do tonight. The result was a bunch of careless shots by Kobe, playing right into the Blazers' hands.
Andre Miller was like a kid in a candy store tonight, providing the kid spent his time chucking gumballs to all the other kids passing by instead of just hogging them for himself. Don't worry, 'Dre went 4-8 for 12 points but his big contribution was the 13 assists, only 1 fewer than the Lakers managed combined. He also had 6 rebounds and participated quietly in that late-game toughness we talked about.
Brandon Roy played 29 minutes with 5 points, 3 rebounds, and 3 assists. He also had 4 fouls. But he was the only guy in the second unit you didn't fear would cough up the game. He actually stared down Artest on Gerald Wallace's behalf while Gerald Wallace picked Gerald Wallace's self up from the floor after Crazy Ronnie elbowed him in the back of the head on a rebound.
Episode #192, Page 1
"Skipper, what's this?"
"I don't know little buddy. Where did you find it?"
"Behind this coconut."
"Hmmm...there's some kind of writing on it. Professor, can you make it out?"
"Interesting. Unless I am mistaken this is a basketball shot. The writing is in Spanish. It says, 'Property of Rudy Fernandez.'"
"What do we do with it, Skipper?"
"Hold onto it little buddy. It must be important or this 'Rudy Fernandez' wouldn't have marked it like that."
"It's sad thinking about some basketball player running around without his shot, Skipper."
"I know, but we'll return it as soon as we get off this island."
"Good plan, Skipper! I'm sure that will be soon."
Oh, and Patty Mills went 1-6 in 9 minutes. Perhaps his shot is in Lovie's handbag.
Chris Johnson played 7 minutes and mostly didn't blow it.
Stats of the NIght
- Blazers 20 fast break points, L.A. 6
- Lakers 17 turnovers for 13 Portland points, Portland 9 turnovers for 0 L.A. points.
- L.A. 21 offensive rebounds to Portland's 7.
- L.A. 44% from distance but only 39.5% overall
- Blazers 28 assists on 35 made baskets
- Kobe Byrant 10-25, Pau Gasol 4-11, Ron Artest 4-14
Odd Notes and Links
Silver Screen and Roll will no doubt have Phil Jackson's quote about how this was all the fault of the referees, as usual.
Your scoreboard and next game form for the Jersey Contest.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
116 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yay Blazers!
Winning is great.
Beating the Lakers is always awesome all the time.
"The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason." - G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy, 1909
Blazersedge.com || New to Blazersedge?
Actions -> Rec and Flag. Blazersedge works right when you use these two things.
we could still catch denver
denver lost tonight and at this point we can still catch the nuggets for fifth if they lose tomorrow we will only be 1 behind and we would own the rtie braker because the series is even and we would have the better division record!!!
they play golden state too
they actually would only need a loss to one of those two teams not both maybe they let down their gaurd tomorrow against a minnesota team because they are in a back to back and then they lose to golden state who bye the way have played pretty well lately. so actually i think it is very possible that the blazers move up and that might be good because the way things are going the mavs might get passed by oklahoma city for third.
shouldn't we focus on catching the Hornets first?
they still have the inside track on 6, not us.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
they have a tuff game against memphis on sunday
i would say we have the upper hand on 6th right now actually because we only have two games left and we are a half game up. they are on the road the next game against the griz, i would say we will probably get the 6th seed, but i wouldnt be suprised if denver slips up after not playing well tonight and gets to the fifth seed.
until New Orleans loses, they have the upper hand.
it’s called controlling your own destiny. New Orleans is playing in every game which can remove them from 6th place. We are not. no matter what we do, we need help from someone else.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
this
NO has the tie breaker so they have to lose one more game than we do for us to get 6th. At this point it’s in their hands. We can increase the possibility but that’s all.
i would still say portland is in a better place they put the pressure on nola to have to win on sunday and if they dont then its ours. they are on the road in a place where not to many teams have won this year. without david west i dont see them winning that game. so i think portland has the upper hand with the win tonight because no one rxpected the win. new orleans will fall in that game portland will clinch that spot a couple nights later against memphis who doesnt play well away from home
tonight's win just undid our disastrous loss on Tuesday, that's all
no one expected us to lost that one, but we did. so we are right back where we were before. At the end of the day, we need someone else to do our dirty work in order to finish 6th. the Hornets need only do their own dirty work. I’d say it’s pretty obvious who has the upper hand.
Don’t confuse this with a prediction, because it’s not. I actually predict the Hornets will lose to Memphis. But until they do, they will continue to have the advantage on us.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
ya
ya i see what your saying i just think there is more pressure on the hornets i just think they have to win that game after portland won this game kinda like portland was thinking coming into the last two games as must win games to keep pace. this might be the hornets tuffest game left. portland just won their game that was the tuffest.
Don't forget we also have to play the Griz after NOH plays them. That may be the toughest yet.
hg
by BBK on Apr 9, 2011 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions
those 2 games will decide the playoff seeding
unless of course the Griz beat, NOLA, Portland wins against Memphis and then the Blazers cough up the 6th seed down in Oakland while the Mavs roll over and let the Hornets win
Not a prediction, but those hypothetical results would be a [archane colloquialism for a female canine]
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
that's why im hoping that OKC stay close enough to the Mavs to force them to have to try that last night
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
that still won't help Portland win down in Oakland
it’s going to take a mammoth effort from Crash, LMA and Andre to get that last W…plus a hot night from behind the 3pt line
for the Blazers, not the Warriors
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
right, but if NO loses to mem and Dal, then Oakland won't matter
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
as long as Portland wins Tuesday night
otherwise, the Griz could factor in
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
yeah, obviously
a loss to Memphis changes all the equations.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
I have a feeling Dallas will cash it in against NO
Unfortunately. I could also see us losing to GS or the Grizz.
I am not sure about this.
If OKC can get by the lakers and and Mavs lose two, OKC will be third and Mavs would drop to 4Th to play Denver. Therefore I don’t think Dallas will be throwing games.
My prediction is that NO will lose to the Grizzlies and Mavs, the Grizzlies will lose to us on Tuesday and we will have 6th.
hg
by BBK on Apr 9, 2011 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I Predict
When the season is over we’ll know how this is going to shake out
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 10, 2011 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions
PREACH, BROTHA, PREACH!
"Hey! If the moon were made of ribs, wouldja eat it? I know I would!"
Actually, apparently Phil says the Lakers are lazy and “just don’t want to play hard right now.” That’s what I saw tonight. Months and months ago, someone figured that Phil might be resting his starters by this game. We didn’t get that, but I guess they rested themselves.
big win, though, however it came to be.
Yeah Lakers weren't in kill mode
but we won so I really don’t care. They did have us massively out-sized with Camby out and the Blazers played long minutes last night in Utah.
before he gets lost in the fray of great performances tonight
I would like to give a shout out to my man Nate. Go Blazers!!! Get that #6 seed!!!
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 8, 2011 11:37 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
he's been telling the players to run all along
they just faced a team with indifferent transition defense, last night
it’s going to take a different formula to win a playoff series…can Nate whip up a new recipe on the fly?
color me skeptical, based on past post season results
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
it would be funny, or something, if we keep the #6 seed and LA falls to #3. I guess you just try to win your games and play who you play.
by Section323 on Apr 8, 2011 11:39 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
+92
It is what it is….and you take what you get
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
An interesting note that I read when lurking on Silver Screen and Roll
Considering the refs are kinda at odds with Stern right now, maybe it does make sense that we were getting a little extra from them, just for the sake of spiting Stern? I personally thought they just called the game pretty sparingly, only blowing their whistles when things were too blatant to let go, but letting the little, physical stuff go for the most part. Lakers fans are throwing a tantrum about the refs, maybe they’re right, Stern is obviously on the side of the Lakers/big market teams, the refs are at odds with Stern = the refs helping Portland for the night?!?!
/endconspiracytheory
Nicolas Batum; "The Smoothest Cat in the Nba"
doubt if they helped us
Maybe they didn’t hurt us.
I find it funny that Laker fans have to come up with a huge conspiracy to justify why the refs aren’t handing them calls.
by Jonathan Wright on Apr 8, 2011 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Blazer (and King's) fans have taught them well
of course, “we” had just cause to complain
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
if the refs really wanted to help Portland, they would have tossed Artest and K*be
certainly those two players whined and gesticulated enough to deserve it
but I suspect the beat will go re: L*A’s success in May/June. SoCal drives the TV/advertising ratings, certainly not Portland or OKC
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Great game!
But it gets me thinking. How many years can Crash play like this? He’s been playing 100% for a while. Nate says he wont be able to move by 50. ha.
"Part of me wants him to beast up the Blazers, but part of me thinks he should move to Hawaii and become a dentist." - Llamaiguana
don't want to think about it
he’s one concussion away from being cuckoo for Coco Pops
and he came close on the blind screen the other night
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I was just over at SSC and I realized that it is possible now that the lakers are not going to finish the season in second
They are only a game in front of Dallas and 2 in front of OKC and they play OKC before the season ends. If that happens and the lakers fall to 3 or forth do we loose game to avoid them if it comes down to it?
lakers schedule has OKC and Spurs next
so this 4 game losing streak hasn’t done them any favors. that OKC/LAL game should be really good on sunday – OKC will want to move up and avoid Denver, so you know they will want it. Lakers need it to stay ahead of Dallas and OKC. interesting.
Dallas absolutely does not want Denver in round 1. more than anything. so thoughts of them tanking the final game to new Orleans appear less likely. heck, its conceivable we are focused so hard on not finishing 7th, that we could end up WANTING to finish 7th if Dallas somehow passes the Lake show for 2nd. gotta go check the tie-break on that…
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
ok, Lakers own tiebreaker since they are division champ
so dallas would need 2 more laker losses and to not lose themselves. possible, but unlikely to happen.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
thinking of ways to avoid the lakers and OKC in round 1 makes my head hurt
I can’ believe it but I hope the Lakers win out and stay in 2nd it is too complicated if they loose.
It is more important that we play well and come together as a team than to worry about what anyone else does or where we finish
We can’t control what everyone else does anyways
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 4:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Our rooting interests the rest of the way:
Sunday:
Lakers/Thunder: Thunder, to keep heat on Dallas
Hornets/Grizzlies: Grizzlies, to give us control of our own destiny for #6
Suns/Dallas: Suns, to force Dallas into needing to win final night
Monday:
jazz/hornets: Jazz, no explanation needed
dallas/houston: depends on where Dal and OKC are – we want dallas to lose enough to be forced to try and win the final night, but not so much that they actually fall to 4th
OKC/Sac: See above
Wednesday:
Hornets/Mavericks: Mavericks, unless we already have 6th clinched and Dallas winning would somehow push them past teh Lakers.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
My father in law is a Laker fan
and completely flipped out after this game. I couldn’t believe it. A 50+ year old guy went raging 12 year old mode…demanding a first round match-up against the Blazers and announcing a 4 game sweep.
I just let him talk until he calmed down. Just shaking my head lol
I would of chanted "Ger-ald Wall-ace" to him
But, that’s just me
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 4:16 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol didn't want to encourage him
He was freaking out in epic classless fashion and it was his house we were watching the game at.
I do want to face of with the Lakers at some point in the playoffs though. Not first round but second if we make it. The Lakers are the better team by far but many of their fans are completely deluded. They see nothing but their team’s superiority.
I would love to see him sweat out a game 6 or a game 7. Run them every game and see how well they respond.
I really wish the Lakers would draw a team like Denver or Memphis in the first round. NO for them would be getting off easy. I want to see them matched up with a younger, hungrier team with a lot of speed and size. Unfortunately that doesn’t seem likely.
that's funny.
must be tough having a laker fan for a father in law.
my father in law is a knick’s fan (grew up in ny) so there’s not much tension there. he’s also an ohio state fan (lived in ohio) so he’s really pulling for oden, so we have an easy time watching games together.
bring on the lakers
look honestly i think i wouldnt be upset if the blazers faced the lakers in the first round. we have played them tuff every game so far except the first meeting this year but other than that they should have won the last game in portland, and they should have beat the lakers last time they played theyb out played the lakers three out of the four meetings this year. portland matches up well with the lakers when camby is in and we can beat them when we go small too. lakers havent played well at all lately matter of fact they playing the worst out of any playoff team in the west right now. maybe the mavs are right there with them but they atleast won tonight so i say if we play la we can beat them.
regular season =/= post season
our chances to win a 7 game series against the Lakers are much much lower than our chances to win a 7 game series against any other possible opponent. Yes, it really is that simple.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
i still wouldnt be scared of the lakers players from the lakers told espn that they dont wanna see the blazers in the first round this year. they dont match up well. i dont think people realize how serious the losing streak that the lakers are on is. they have absolutly no chemistry out there. this is not a injury plaged team, or a team that is resting starters this is a team that is playing like they are not the defending world champs. they look like crap, and its not the same as the game the blazers just had against golden state because that was one night i think the blazers have made up for that with the last two games! so actually i dont see them as the same team as last year at all not the way they are playing.
in two weeks, this late season slump will be a distant memory
the Lakers are a veteran bunch who have been to the Finals 3 straight seasons, being led by a coach with 11 titles. They know how to turn it on when it counts. the slump, just like the one they had late in the year last year, is being wildly overrated.
"I want to be traded to a contender" is almost always code-speak for "I'm a loser."
-Dave, 2/5/2010: http://www.blazersedge.com/2010/2/5/1297509/no-amore-for-amare
no way
there is no way that this is just going to be thrown out of their minds they are all starting to question eachother out their and now the ‘zen master’ is doing the same questiong their heart their energy, if you watched the game tonight they bhardly played any d, and when something would happen it seemed like they all looked for someone to blame other than themselves they dont look the same as they did last year, they didnt lose this many at the end of the year last year. this team is not the same their old, and right now are finding it hard to make buckets. its not like they were in a back to back they were in portland 2 days early. you guys are crazy to just give up like that. portland fans are supposed to believe in their team. i know i do.
It looked that way before the all star break for a bit too
Then they rattled off like 17-1 against a lot of good teams. Most of them are sick of the regular season and wishing they had picked up a few more wins earlier so they didn’t have to try and work for HCA over the Bulls and Celtics now for the finals.
the lakers are slipping up more now than they did before the all star break though, they cant score right now at all. and that is not even an argument that the lakers are just sick of it. they are playing all their stars and they still look like crap. they said their last game was their worst game of the season well not anymore because they followed their worst game of the season up with an even worse outing! that is not very good is it.
how sweet to be the team to ELIMINATE the L@kers !
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
I guess we'll see
I’ve seen a few Blazers games where the team looked like one of the worst in the NBA. Lakers’ shots will fall eventually I think. They’re stacked with elite players that have been playing at a very high level for a long time.
It takes a good amount of focus and effort to play at an NBA level though. Bringing lousy effort against a team that wants to win is usually a sure recipe for disaster. Our recent game against Golden State is a good example.
maybe, but we are getting better,
largely due to integrating Wallace. And the L@kers just may not be what they used to be.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
we didn't even have our starting center Camby tonight.
Maybe Rudy should just go on the disabled list with back trouble if we can get a medical pass to add a player, a big player.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
i do not share your optimism, but I do think it would be an interesting series. I think the Lakers will get a whole lot more interested in winning in the playoffs, and I think that “Blazers vs GSW” Blazers could show up for a few games and then we would be doomed.
^ this
Don’t get me wrong – I love the win and a 24 point lead at one point against the *akers – but I don’t think the game mattered much to them. The playoffs will.
And when the Blazers can put a few quality wins in a row together I’ll take them more seriously as a playoff threat. However, they haven’t shown much consistency lately.
Secondarily, they are certainly still lacking a killer instinct against most good or bad teams. that’s why we didn’t win at least one more against the *akers and why our starters never seem to get any rest.
That said: GO BLAZERS!
put a body on 'em
Doubt we would win
Pushing them to at least 6 games would be a major moral victory. Our defense is a nightmare and when our shots aren’t falling our offense goes straight down the crapper. I’m honestly not sure how we’ll handle a playoff series against any upper seed at this point.
We could brilliantly destroy them in a game or two and then look like mid-season Cleveland in the other games. It might be a fun series to watch though and since we’re not contending that’s about all you can ask for.
the only Blazer fans who should be rooting for a first-round matchup against L*A
are the season ticket holders who finance their children’s college education by selling their seats to L*ker fans
‘way too much yellow in the RG, but it’s been that way for decades
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
It's crazy to think that just two season's ago our bench was one of the best in the league.
Also could someone post a missing persons report for Rudy?The guy barely looks like basketball player right now.
Great freaking win…….
I'd say his back is bothering him
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 4:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd say his spring disappearing act is a worrisome trend
and his trade value is circling the drain, again
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Apr 9, 2011 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The team is starting to take on the personality of Gerald Wallace, who wants it bad.
And in the playoffs, the rotation tightens up to 7 or 8 guys.
ignacio
We have about 6 servicable guys when Camby is healthy.
One guy who sometimes shows up
One guy who’s been missing for weeks
and some small guy with a beard that talks funny.
Nicolas Batum; "The Smoothest Cat in the NBA"
Keep me in coach!
The next one will go in for sure mate…I mean Nate…I mean coach…
Too bad we don't have Priz to ad to those stare downs
I will say, GW trade has made Charlotte my favorite East Coast team. Making up for ten year sof not realizing I was a Gerald Wallace Fan
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 4:19 AM PDT up reply actions
this^
Portland needs another big with bulk, but it’s too late to add one now
all of those offensive rebounds were keeping L*A in the game
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
a spectacular effort from all our starters
how often do we have all 5 starters in double figures, 3 of them with double doubles? against one of the NBA’s elite teams, on the second night of a back to back?
c’mon stat guys, when is the last time that happened?
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
This is the kind of effort I wanted to see.
RIP CITY - We're back!
This game was an aberration.
There’s very little to take from it.
As it is, Chicago should win it all.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
Well, it was a ton of fun.
One thing worth mentioning, in the larger picture, is that the Blazers seem to play up or down to their opponents quite often.
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
It was fun to win
Other than that yeah. Tells us nothing. Was nice to not get swept by the Lakers this season though. We should send them a card lol
This was a Golf Game
You always hit at least one shot that makes you think with some work, you might be really good..Although I think the Blazers might be really good next year
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 4:21 AM PDT up reply actions
admit it, AK!
We ran and it worked! We can run on the Lakers…it’s a strength we have in this matchup. It’s how we can in part neutralize their size. This was an important win for us, no reason to just toss it out the window. The Lakers could have been playing for home court in the finals, I don’t see why they wouldn’t have wanted to win that game.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 9, 2011 8:42 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I hope da Bulls beat L*A in June
It would validate Thibs as an elite head coach
but a front line of Boozer, Deng and Joe-Kim? (And below-average production from the 2-guard position?)
That doesn’t scream “NBA champions” to me. Rose is very good, but he’s not MJ
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
A front line of Boozer, Deng, Joakim, Kurt Thomas, Taj Gibson, and Omer Asik?
They’ve got a full bevy of good big men. Boozer on offense, everyone else on defense.
How I wish we had Kurt Thomas…
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
Silver Screen and Roll will no doubt have Phil Jackson’s quote about how this was all the fault of the referees, as usual.
No mention about Phil’s ref comments, but a good third of the comments I saw over there were about saki and sushi bars… I know we’ve talked about food on BE before, but that made some our most foodie comments look like comparing PB&J to Tuna
Blazers win!
There is this one play in the game that still bothers me. It's Wesley's 3rd foul which he got called for on Kobe.
It was the weakest foul, and they called it when they knew Kobe was about to dunk it. Almost like it was a set up highlight.
That ref should be fined for that call. It’s just unbelievable the star calls Kobe gets.
That one was awful.
And the one right before it Wes wasn’t much better, where he maybe/barely touched Kobe’s arm on a shot release from the top of the key.
put a body on 'em
Thanks for the sig Dave! I loved that phrase.
"Say his NAME, Portland. Gerald Wallace is...awesome." -Dave, 4/9/11
Lots of awesomeness tonight but...
I just wanna say I am way happy we have Chris Johnson and not Sean Marks right now.
laker elbows, too wimpy, too late
so kobee throws an obvious high elbow at Brandons chin, Brandon does some Ali like shuffle to spare his dentures, and kobee leans in to draw contact, then falls like an obese duck, as Brandon pulls the chair…
and violet the precious palmer calls a foul on Brandon…pathetic…is too kind
What a disgrace to her profession,. the Drama Critics Union of America
Violet knows where her bread is buttered
as do most (if not all) of the league’s officials
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
huh, what about the play where the Blazers fouled Ron Artest on three different shots/offensive rebounds. Maybe there were bad calls, but I think they mostly went the Blazers way last night. The Laker fans strongly agree.
Looked like a lot of no-calls both ways
after calling ticky tack stuff in the first half. I can live with that.
A lead in tht could only be from Idaho! LOL
“Ever hit a raccoon with your pickup and then feel bad about it? That’s what Portland did to L.A. tonight, minus the feeling bad part. "
Ok, I am originally from almost Idaho or “Might as well be in Idaho”, LOL
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
It wasn't a racoon
It was a skunk…and even though it is dead, you don’t feel bad, because the (Laker) smell lingers
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
reminds me of an old country song
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Comments about Idahoans hitting raccoons with their trucks and not feeling bad...
seem to have potential racist overtones leaking from between the lines.
It appears to be a poor choice of words.
Amen
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 9, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Certainly. It's only when you start saying that the metaphor 'could only be from Idaho'
and giving the secret handshake of “I’m from Idaho too, wink wink.” that I become vaguely suspicious.
Maybe we should ban the word ‘raccoon’ so nobody is ever offended again? :)
But I am a Redneck Hillbilly from the part of Oregon that may as well be Idaho
It would be like calling me racist for using the word, “Cracker”.. I am a Honky BTW
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Good Win but for all the problems
The Fakers are having right now Portland is capable of far worse and had had far worse stretches this season. I think it is far fetched to think we could beat these guys in a series when they have home court especially. I think we would beat them spectacularly 2 games in the series though. Go Blazers! I would rather play Dallas.
by GoodNoCall on Apr 9, 2011 7:33 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Agreed
I’m pretty sure we would get it to 6. If we do end up with them in a series we need to make their bigs run. Might give us more edge later in the series if we can tire them out a little.
Raccons and dime store pantyhose...
Great writing Dave and I absolutely concur with your identification of what was the most ‘Notable Development’ of the game…Late in the game, Wallace was so completely in Ron-Ron’s head that Artest went to the free throw line and spent the entire time there, not calmly bouncing the ball and getting into rythym, but glaring murderously at Gerald…My heart did multiple handstands as I silently giggled and thought to myself: “FINALLY!”
"The Blazers feasted on turnovers"
yumm, those turnovers we ate last night were really tasty! let’s get some more of those!
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
offered their appreciation to #3 with an enormous “Ger-ald Wal-lace” chant midway through the period.
Did anyone get the “Ger-ald Wal-lace!” chant on mp3 without the TV commentary? I could use a fresh ringtone
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
by two4larue on Apr 9, 2011 9:49 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I put the Mar-cus Cam-by (clap-clap-clap) chant on my phone, last year
it was up on the Blazer’s podcasts…then phonezoo.com did the rest
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I wonder what the chances are of getting the wma file for that clip?
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Long-time observers will say, “Finally!” All it takes is a couple players to make the attitude shift and the rest of the team follows. The Blazers now have those players.
Yes, we do and they they can. But there’s always room for more of them on the roster
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Gerald Wallace also played point forward late in the game when the Blazers needed to switch it up and combat the Laker pressure.
Has Nate found his back-up PG for the post season? All that remains for the head coach is to stagger the rotation so either ’Dre or Crash are on the floor at all times
Wallace > Roy/Rudy/Patty re: initiating half-court sets, when it counts
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Nate found lots of things last night
He has been saying he still wants to play with rotations and matchups.. I think the high screens and use of Gerald as point forward are two things that made us move better. We moved better because we made baskets and were not defending the break. We defended the 1/2 court so we got rebounds and ran.
Nate may know more than most people give him credit for. He has given a variety of players a chance to be the taller Point Player that has better vison against the other team
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 9, 2011 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
We defended the 1/2 court so we got rebounds and ran.
Umm
Stats of the NIght
* Lakers 17 turnovers for 13 Portland points, Portland 9 turnovers for 0 L.A. points.
* L.A. 21 offensive rebounds to Portland’s 7
The Blazers were running off of tipped balls and steals, not so much the L*ker’s missed shots
Don Nelson was the first coach to take full advantage of the point forward (Paul Pressey, Milwaukee) Nate has tried all of the other “options” and found that GW currently gives him the best chance to win, when Miller is off the floor. I’m not sure that this is superior coaching, or just a desperate attempt to mask the front office’s poor roster decisions from the past 9 months re: the backup PG and C positions
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
To be fair the Lakers did miss 52 shots
So there probably was some running off of misses as well. Despite giving them as many offensive boards as there are stars in the sky, we still managed to beat them on the defensive boards.
I’m still waiting for the post season to see what Nate does. I expect him to do better than the last couple seasons but that may only be because he has a decent roster to work with. We’re thin to non-existent in a couple of places but this is probably as healthy as we get.
Kudos for the Gilligan schtick, Dave! Quite inspired, I believe. And true. More's the pity.
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
--Alfred Lord Tennyson
People used to compare Batum to Pippen a lot, but Wallace is the closest I've seen to Pippen in the league right now.
Especially after seeing him play point forward.
Dre ain't got no love for these pros

by 






























