Game 3 Media Row Report: Blazers 97, Mavericks 92
The Portland Trail Blazers had to win and they did, dropping the Dallas Mavericks 97-92 in the Rose Garden on Thursday night. Portland stuck to form in one important way, and it was enough to cut Dallas's lead in their first round playoff series to 2-1.
Thursday morning I looked at a key driver for Portland's potential success against Western Conference: turnover differential. As a refresher...
The Blazers went 7-0 in their final seven home games against Western Conference playoff teams. In those games, Portland won by an average margin of five points, yet shot the same field goal percentage (46%) as their opponents, shot worse from the three-point line (35.8% to 38.5%) and averaged just two more trips to the free throw line. Was this a matter of Portland's vaunted offensive rebounding carrying the day? Nope. The Blazers were out-rebounded, on average, 41-38 and gave up more offensive rebounds than they corralled.
So if the Blazers were shooting worse, rebounding less and getting to the free throw line just two extra times per game, how did they manage to win all seven games by such a wide margin? Turnovers.
Portland's slow-down pace and focus on ball control gave Portland a +2.6 turnover differential on the season (Portland averaged 12.4 turnovers while its opponents averaged 15.0). During that closing 7-0 stretch, that already strong differential doubled to +5.2 (Portland averaged 9.4 turnovers while its opponents averaged 14.6).
Thursday's boxscore fit that mold to a T. Dallas shot better from the field (51.5% to 48.0%), made one more three-pointer, took two more free throws and secured exactly the same number of rebounds as Portland on both the offensive and defensive ends.
Yet Portland won by five. That was their exact margin of victory over those previous seven home games. How did they do it? The same way they've been doing it. By forcing Dallas into 16 turnovers and winning the turnover differential by seven.
It's not often I stumble upon a statistical nugget that Kevin Pelton of Basketball Prospectus hasn't already unearthed. When it happens I have to let him know about it... and know about it... and know about it. As Dallas started sloppy early, I made a point of punching his right arm following every Mavericks turnover. As the game entered the second quarter, he became annoyed and a bit whiny, yelling things like "ow-wee" and "I've getting a boo boo on my arm arm", the types of things that sound totally normal in your head when you talk to your cats all day instead of real humans. As the turnovers continued throughout the second half, started to take a perverse pleasure in the new ritual, actually pointing to his arm and then begging to be punched after a late Jason Terry miscue.
Punch him I did for the 16th and final time, one last, enthusiastic thump as an exclamation point on a stressful night at the Rose Garden. Playoff tension is just so awesome.
Anyway, the turnovers, Blazers coach Nate McMillan said, were big. "They don't turn the ball over. I thought our pressure was good. It started with Wesley [Matthews] picking the ball up. Our pick and roll defense was much better tonight. Our bigs were up and being much more aggressive and at times we mixed in some traps and Dallas does a good job of taking care of the ball. Tonight we were able to force those turnovers and convert them into points."
No question there was a motivation imbalance to start the game. The Blazers had a feeling of "desperation," a word that Matthews used post-game before quickly correcting himself to say "urgency." The Mavericks, on the other hand, were loose and confident, but not in kill-mode. Dallas weathered the first Portland rush admirably and didn't really start to unravel until center Tyson Chandler found himself in foul trouble. Somewhere watching at home, Joel Przybilla started a drinking game -- take a shot every time Chandler commits a foul, chug when he scowls on his way back to the bench -- and is now really drunk and loving life. Chandler fouled out in just 15 minutes.
Portland's initial push came courtesy of Matthews, who practically refused to talk about his individual play after leading Portland with 25 points on 8-12 shooting. Thankfully, LaMarcus Aldridge was there to do it for him. "I think every game [this series] the team that's won it has had someone play really, really well," Aldridge said. "Tonight it was Wesley."
There's been so much to like about Aldridge's maturation this season but that quote is near the top. Aldridge, Matthews and everyone else with a pulse in the Rose Garden knows that the bulk of the headlines are going to Brandon Roy, who finished with 16 crucial points off the bench to help push Portland over the hump.
But it was Matthews' hot shooting that got Portland up early. 16 points in the first quarter. 22 points in the first half. Good shot selection (even including the heat checks, which you know are coming). Solid defense throughout the game on top of it. That Aldridge would single out Matthews with praise -- despite his own success on the night and the mountain of questions about Roy -- is a moment that will endure. Credit where credit is due. Recognition and rewards for those who have earned it.
Aldridge also pointed out that Matthews' outside shooting made his life easier. "They were clogging me early. His third [three] was me just giving it to him because I think in the first two games, they were just clogging, I couldn't get to the middle. Him making his shots just opened it up for everybody."
"Playing with confidence," Aldridge said of Roy's night. "I thought he had his swag back tonight. He was a little bit more loose, going through his legs more, I thought that was big for us tonight."
People care. And they want to see it at least three more times. Roy was careful to caution those present that he isn't guaranteeing a repeat of his Game 3 performance. But there's no doubt that he likes delivering.
Random Game Notes
- Here's a longer column for CBSSports.com on Brandon Roy's night.
- I had a feeling that tonight would be Rudy Fernandez's tonight. 0-2 for 0 points in 11 minutes. That feeling was pretty wrong.
- I had a feeling that tonight would be Jason Terry's night. 29 points and seven assists. That feeling was pretty right. The good news for Portland is that they were able to overcome the explosion with relative ease, as Jason Kidd, DeShawn Stevenson and J.J. Barea combined for just 14 points. The bad news is that Terry is capable of doing that again multiple times in the next four games.
- Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban was in fine form. Before the game, he was getting up warm-up shots with some of his players. During the game, Cuban was yelling back and forth with the Rose Garden crowd. ESPNDallas.com reports that he was hit in the face by a "projectile."
- Chris Johnson got all sorts of post-game love from McMillan for his five minutes off the bench, including two great blocks. Be sure to check that out below.
- Such an Andre Miller night. Overlooked. (Not mentioned until the final bullet point.) 16 points and seven assists. Won the match-up with Kidd as he needed to do.
Nate McMillan's Post-Game Comments
Initial Thoughts
I thought we worked for it tonight. I thought we got the tempo we wanted. Defensively we were much more aggressive on the ball. On the pick-and-rolls. Transition was good tonight, I thought we got that tempo -- we got away from it a little bit in the second quarter -- but for the most part did a good job of keeping pressure on Dallas's defense tonight.
Brandon Roy
He talked about wanting to play and he wanted to play the last game. I thought tonight he came out, he was focused even though the comments didn't both him, he came out and he played. This is the guy we know is capable of producing and tonight he did that. I thought he did a good job of getting us into our offense. We had some match-ups where he created and produced points for us.
Closing the game
Well, Dallas is a good team. The game was looking like the last two games. We won the first quarter, lost the second and we said look, we want to win the third and the fourth. We finally was able to do that. The fourth quarter we did a better job of not allowing them to get into the penalty early. Chris Johnson basically came out and did a real nice job defensively with Camby being in foul trouble and giving us some good minutes, six or seven minutes in that fourth quarter.
Did you need that performance from Brandon?
Your key guys are going to always be a big part. You're going to need other guys to step up. We certainly need guys off the bench, Brandon, Nicolas, Rudy to be productive. But the play of Chris tonight. Barea was big for them the last game. Guys like that coming off the bench is going to be important that they play well. You know LaMarcus is going to do his thing and Miller but those guys coming off the bench will have opportunities and he was the difference tonight.
Forcing 16 turnovers
Big, because they don't turn the ball over. I thought our pressure was good. It started with Wesley picking the ball up. Our pick and roll defense was much better tonight. Our bigs were up and being much more aggressive and at times we mixed in some traps and Dallas does a good job of taking care of the ball. Tonight we were able to force those turnovers and convert them into points.
Wesley Matthews
He shot the ball well last game. I thought he got a little tired our last game against Dallas. Picking up the ball but tonight for the most part he did a good job of making Kidd work and not allowing Kidd to really just walk them into their offense. We disrupted a little bit with his defense. When he locks in defensively and allows the game to come to him offensively he has been really good this year. He did a good job of spacing and making them pay when they tried to clog and double team the post.
Theatre of Brandon's moment
I said this to you guys the other day. And I'll repeat it. There's nobody in the state -- as I told Brandon -- not even Brandon Roy wants to see him out on that floor as much as I do. He's meant a lot to this organization and I certainly have not forgotten him or certainly do not disrespect ... This season, he's a guy that we are bringing along, the second half of the season and into the playoffs, trying to create this role. It's worked at times and tonight was one of those examples where we can get match-ups with Brandon. He can still produce. Tonight I thought he was solid.
Chris Johnson
Yeah. He has definitely earned the right to play some minutes. He played the last game that we played Dallas here and really gave us some good minutes so we had talked about getting him into a rotation and he did a good job on the pick and roll defense. Weakside, he came over and changed a few shots. His minutes were crucial minutes. Very important minutes that allowed us to keep Camby on the bench for a few minutes as well as give LaMarcus a breather.
Johnson was ready to play
As we tell our guys, we never know when your opportunity is going to come. All of our guys work and try to prepare themselves for the opportunity. He got his tonight and he was really good. It really helped us. We know that he was the defensive player of the year down in the D-League and tonight he played very well on the defensive end of the floor.
What dictated Brandon's playing time?
His play. As I've said before, the last game I just felt like that first unit, Miller, Wesley they had a roll. I thought Brandon had a roll or had a match-up in the first game where he played 26 or 27 minutes. He didn't score but I like the match-up that we had. The last game I liked the match-up of Wesley and Miller. Tonight it was Roy. So we got something out of that match-up and it was good. I had to sub it because he asked for a breather but we were going to ride him as long as we could.
-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
148 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Suddenly we might have a bench
and that makes the Blazersa different team.
ignacio
our bench is like the moon on a cloudy night
now you see it, now you don’t
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Like it when I see it !
When they play like they did last night, I fear no team.
Go Blazers !!!!
" I'm coaching here " ...... Nate McMillan
by FrenchieFan on Apr 22, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
The bench had nice individual efforts
but poor overall organization. No point guard doesn’t work. I wish Nate would realize that.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
No. Trust Patty to bring the ball up the court and hand it off.
Nate keeps trotting Rudy out there, to terrible effect. Brandon bringing the ball up the court gives us approximately 11 seconds to run a play. It’s ridiculous.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
all i have to say
alll i have to say is screw everyone who ever doubted Roy and said he should sit the entire series from now on, especially those who commented on Canzano’s Oregonlive article…he will make or break this series, guarantee it
stop hating on the man who is the most clutch player for the past 5-10 years in our organization
Aw, that's not very nice
And before we get too crazy, psst, it was one game.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 22, 2011 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions
I have been a Roy Supporter
However, all my previous supportive comments have been what I think he could do again. THat is really a case of kind of going out there a bit. He finally showed last night.
I think we are still looking at a guy whose minutes need limited the rest of his career. But, with fresh legs, he should always be able to make shots. Though, his game may start resembling a rec league old guy. 3’s and 2’s still count the same and he still has that killer instinct.
I think BRoy having this game will be huge for next year. positive mindset over the summer as he looks to work on the parts of his game he still can be lethal with
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 22, 2011 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Roy's performance last night showed that he can still contribute to our team's success, which came as a huge relief to the team and its fans. I was pleased to join in the ovation for employee #7. Was great to see him back.
The electricity in the RG last night was something special. Nothing like a winning playoff game to get the team back on the same page. Now let’s repeat on Saturday, and we will have a series!
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
Roy's had good games this year before this
but the overall factors that contributed to him being a pretty crappy player over the course of the season are still present. Most of his production is still coming from non-paint 2 point shots, which are the least efficient shot in basketball. He’ll have games where he hits them, of course. But his positive games against New Orleans and Dallas and Denver during the regular season weren’t harbingers of better play in the future. They were just games where he happened to hit shots. I don’t see why this would be any different.
i keep dancing on my own
Dirk disagrees
…..production is still coming from non-paint 2 point shots, which are the least efficient shot in basketball
He has based a large portion of his HOF career from hitting jumpers from the elbow (Roy’s favorite jump shot area)
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Dirk manufactures tons of FTAs and makes lots of three pointers. The elbow jumper isn’t a bad shot, as it’s useful to set up the drive to the basket or get defenders to crowd up on you and foul you. But since Roy doesn’t really draw fouls much anymore (his FT rate is about 1/2 what it was in 2010), and the mid-range jumper is basically his entire game, I’d object to the comparison to Dirk’s mid-range game (or even Roy’s midrange game in the past).
i keep dancing on my own
All I am saying is that is to just write off last night's performance
as he got lucky and hit some shots is short changing what happened. Roy got to his spots…..not forced …he GOT to them…then made the shots that he had made his whole career.
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I disagree in that we saw him elevate, seperate and get his legs more into the shots
He had been tentative. Confidence equates to aggressive and finishing IMO
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 22, 2011 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions
non-paint jumpers are what teams settle for
when the defense denies a higher-percentage shot and the clock is running down
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
or
confident shooters will shoot from anywhere when open, because they have a high likelyhood of making them. See Wes’s 1Q or Terry all game long. Every jump shot is not a settled opportunity lost
\oo///
Roy's play the past month hadn't warranted a lot of playing time.
and his comments on Tuesday were ill-timed to say the least.
He showed up to play tonight, and made his shots. That’s exactly what he needed to do.
"Well, you can always sell your team."
correlation = causation, silly
he couldn’t have had that game without the comments, so comment away Mr. Roy!
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 22, 2011 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Hey, if he scores and the team wins, he can talk bad about Patty Mills as much as he wants.
Patty seems like a nice enough fellow to do this for the good of the team.
The cake was a lie.
It's a matchup issue. He can't guard point guards and has a tough time checking Matrix.
He also slows the offense down with the ball in his hand.
It’s not about Brandon as much as it is about Brandon being able to play 2 guard while checking someone like Peja instead of trying to stay in front of Jason Terry, who will absolutely eat B Roy’s lunch on the perimeter. Those are difficult minutes for B Roy to find on a team that doesn’t have a trustworthy backup PG. Andre can’t play 48 minutes, although I think he could play more minutes than Nate is giving him.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Roy played well. The most important part of this is that some of the starters were able to rest.
And not play 85 minutes each. I want to see him play well in more than one game of this series. Am so sick of the comments about “haters” as if the people who doubt Roy’s ability to perform has to do with hate.
When comments are made about anyone ELSE’S less than stellar performance it seems to be taken as just that.
There is plenty of hate too
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Camby played with a swollen hand
I guess it could be said he was “hurting the team” every time Marcus took a shot with that sore paw
OTOH, Oden learned how to shoot FTs left-handed while at tOSU—so get to work on that pronto, MC! Greg can be your shooting coach
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
yeah, didn't oden shoot something like 70% with his left hand frmo the free throws or something?
and aldridge got his sweet and smooth jumper because he was injured and couldn’t do anything but shoot for a long time.
Jeff Pendergraph:
FGM - 3
FGA - 111
Min - 30
Reb - 10
by Tofu Anonymous on Apr 22, 2011 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Nic came back from right shoulder surgery shooting better than ever, last spring
Batum credited Monty Williams for that improvement, BTW
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
For all of the good play by the Blazers...
…, you could say the key to victory was simply Kidd missing shots. Nothing flukish in that; Kidd has been a noted bricklayer his entire career. But the truth is, if Dirk and Terry are doing their thing, and then KIDD starts knocking down 3-pointers consistently, that team will give ANYONE trouble.
So thank goodness Kidd was off tonight—and let’s hope that trend continues.
I still believe in Greg Oden. The Blazers' medical staff? Not so much.
I'd change my handle to "bringback'09," but I'm too lazy.
Ummm..If we hit our shots 100 percent we become pretty unstoppable as well
I do agree there is a lot of work to do. This Dallas team is scary efficient on Offense
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 22, 2011 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions
It's like LMA says...
The winning team will have at least one player who plays really well. He’s absolutely spot on with that.
by 52therim on Apr 22, 2011 7:06 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
As we learned in previous years...
Richardson in Phoenix and Scola in Houston both exceeded expectations, like Kidd
So...
I know Dallas had 16 TOs, and 13-23 FT, we had Wesley on fire, Roy rejuvenated…but we don’t talk about the refs today, right? Tyson Chandler was fouled out with, what was the word Nate used…oh yeah, ticky-tacky fouls.
at least Berea
was finally realized for the defenseless flopper that he is. Those “offensive foul” calls really hurt us in game 2, and we were finally able to bully him and Terry tonight.
\\oo///
NBA refs are always bad
Complaining about them is futile.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 22, 2011 6:40 AM PDT up reply actions
they're equal-opportunity targets
fans from both teams always have some gripe The fans from the losing team are just louder
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Camby was treated the same
Team Aldridge
by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 22, 2011 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Free Throw Guy FTW!
We need to take him on the road with us! ;-}
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 22, 2011 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions
ugh
that’s not how I’d like Portland fans to be remembered. The 3 goggles are bad enough
Darth Vader and Boba Fett are more like it. If you’re going to act silly/spastic in public, mask your face
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Dallas missed a lot of free throws...
…which I don’t think will happen again. But definitely the turnovers were a huuuuge difference. Great game from our guys tonight. Matthews, Miller, LA…Chris “Stonewall” Johson (failed attempt for a nickname)…everyone that played contributed in some way tonight (except Rudy). C’mon Rudy! Light it up next game!
I have to say though, whether it was Matthews incredible start, CJohnsons inspiring 5 minute effort, LA’s solid performance and clutch jumpers, or our great defense……none of that mattered to me as much as seeing Roy come out and get after it. Nothing can give me (notice I said ME) more hope for the Blazers this year than seeing BRoy out there doing well. Period.
Great post game words from Coach i thought. Very poignant and “right on” words from LA. I love it when Miller gets the post game on court interview. He’s old school. I think he sounds like Richard Pryor.
Home crowd was awesome as always. The Rose Garden must have been a site to see tonight. I liked what I saw and heard from the fans. Maybe less projectile throwing, even if it is directed at that Cuban guy. Heckle the hell out of him, show him that we don’t need to mic the crowd in Portland to be loud, ask him what happened to his UFL, but in my humble opinion we shouldn’t throw stuff at him. Knowing ESPN, that will probably be the only highlight they show from the game.
I hope our team keeps the TO’s to a minimum and keeps their focus throughout the rest of the series like they did tonight. I think the refs might be more inclined to call it soft on Dallas from here on out as far as the ticky tack fouls. I just hope they don’t try to control the last 5 minutes of the 4th again. We need to keep getting to the line and knocking them down. I hope Camby’s hand is OK too. Go Blazers!!
Martel
took in the game from some courtside seats. You know deep down he still feels like a Blazer!
\\\oo///
was very cool to see Martell at the game
one former Blazer I would like to see at Saturday’s game is Channing Frye
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
Good for the team, good for Roy
OMG I LOVE THIS GUY
The task at hand is still difficult if not impossible, but it was good to see that the Blazers didn’t just lay down and give up.
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
Oh and I like the hungriness that Chris Johnson brought, if only for a few minutes
I wish more of our guys had that energy
The Leeroy Rule: being insistent >>>> being correct
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 22, 2011 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Chris Johnson's role in last night's game cannot be ignored. It was a huge lift for the team to see CJ come off the bench, and provide needed minutes of relief to our big guys. He played with great enthusiasm and ability. A great asset to our team!
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
Great asset?
Let’s no go overboard, now. Audie Norris was a nice player who won a Blazers-Mavericks playoff series with a memorable jump shot, but the Atomic Dog was a better “asset” than CJ is, or ever will be in the future.
Johnson is young, he has athleticism and timing. But he can’t defend physical players in the post and it doesn’t look like he has the kind of body that can add/keep muscle. He’s a bit player who brings energy, that doesn’t equal a great asset. (i.e., no GM is going to call up Cho and ask about acquiring CJ)
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
That was exciting to see the Blazers show heart tonight,
And I really hope that Roy and Matthews can bring it again in game 4. They will need to to have any chance. At least I hope the Blazers can learn from this series. If we can kick the injury bug next season I would think we could be a 55 win team but the team needs to coordinate big time.
by GoodNoCall on Apr 22, 2011 7:07 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
the [historical] correct term is
woodchoppin’
"Mais put… Il est fou ce gars!" - French Jesus about Jewish Ice-T
Haha I was saying this all night
Even if only for the sheer jubilant thrill of maddening joy that I get out of watching him shoot his sidespin free throws.
I think he should just throw them to the right, and let that sidespin and curve them back to the left and in, like bowling.
Marion's form is amazing too
Shawn basically chest passes the ball into the basket, at a career 80+%
Don’t try this at home, kids
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
he's a magician
if you aren’t paying close attention, that ball is through the net before you’re finished blinking.
indeed
his free throw shooting is absolutely laughable
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
I'm worried that Nate...
commented positively on the Blazers pick and roll defense. I guess it was a little better, but it was still pretty bad. Considering how often the play is run, it’s amazing how confused the Blazers look when defending that play. The weak-side defenders don’t rotate quickly. The ball and pick defender appear to miscommunicate often. While the Mavs only scored 92 points, they were actually quite efficient (hardly below their season average… and poor FT shooting can explain the difference).
I don’t understand why the man guarding the pick doesn’t show harder. The better defensive teams in the league, like the Celtics, seem to do that. I haven’t researched it extensively, so I would be happy to have someone tell me I’m wrong. I know most teams mix up the way that they defend, but as a tendency, the Blazers approach seems much more passive than the elite teams in the league.
Thing is
Dallas will run like two or three picks. Makes rotations a bit harder IMO
Putting Matthews and Wallace on Kidd influenced what he could see. Good move IMO
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 22, 2011 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions
agreed
I don’t know how many times we doubled the ball handler leaving Dirk wide open as the roll/pop guy, but it was enough to frustrate me. I understand hedging a pick but you just can’t leave Dirk. Better off to just switch when he’s involved. Different story if Chandler or Haywood is setting the screen
\\oo///
Chandlers picks
maybe I don’t understand exactly how a pick works, but can he shove his leg out like that? Thought he couldn’t be moving?
Terry Porter, the czar of the telestrater
was illustrating this during the pre and half game show
Marcus Camby doesn’t help out well on defense? Who knew?
Bedgers (who are paying attention) that’s who
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I'm worried that Nate...
commented positively on the Blazers pick and roll defense. I guess it was a little better, but it was still pretty bad. Considering how often the play is run, it’s amazing how confused the Blazers look when defending that play. The weak-side defenders don’t rotate quickly. The ball and pick defender appear to miscommunicate often. While the Mavs only scored 92 points, they were actually quite efficient (hardly below their season average… and poor FT shooting can explain the difference).
I don’t understand why the man guarding the pick doesn’t show harder. The better defensive teams in the league, like the Celtics, seem to do that. I haven’t researched it extensively, so I would be happy to have someone tell me I’m wrong. I know most teams mix up the way that they defend, but as a tendency, the Blazers approach seems much more passive than the elite teams in the league.
you aren't wrong - hedging the ball handler and then rotating back is something the Blazers MUST do to win the series
McMillan, conversely, is a big believer in the switch, so who knows.
It does explain why the Blazers look lost though – given that they haven’t practiced that method of defense.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 22, 2011 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah,
especially ugly was the Nic Batum fiasco resulting in a trademark off balance Nowitzki dunk (ugly).
Its so horrendous to just watch our guards let their bigs walk right up along side them and then run right into their body. Of course! Brilliant PnR defense! It’s the biggest blunder in the history of Blazers basketball that it’s been 3 years and Nate/The Players still have no idea how to do what every college basketball team does.
Side note: any one else notice later in the game LaMarcus set a “pick” to screen Barea, once moving toward the corner, and then he turned around to set the pick again when they were trying the ball back out to the top? Both times LaMarcus was squared and stationary and had Barea running right into his body, then LaMarcus INEXPLICABLY turns like one of those restaurant doors leading to the kitchen on the greasiest hinges you’ve ever seen, “bloop” and allows Barea to waltz RIGHT PAST HIM. No wonder this team can’t even get open jump shots.
When you are allowed to move your pick it does make a difference
The refs all series have been allowing the Dallas bigs to move on the pick. I saw chandler do it about 5 times in a row and get called once
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions
i think that's slipping the pick, right?
almost all of aldridge’s picks are this way it creates an advantage for his roll or pop, but not for the ballhandler.
it didn't do anything
he didn’t make a move to get the ball, his defender didn’t leave him (why would he, Barea stayed with Dre)…it’s just his slip pick when he’s supposed to set an ACTUAL pick.
Ref judgement?
Like all fouls..but seems so blatant…
I also noticed again last night that the ballhandler (Roy) didn't run his man into the pick
Brandon dribbled 3-4 feet wide of the screener (probably LMA) which allowed his defender to keep moving freely
this defeats the whole point of the PnR play, not to mention sets up the possibility of a moving screen (offensive foul) if his teammate tries to lean over to compensate
they might as well just clear a side if they aren’t going to execute the play correctly, and it’s been this way for years
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Roy's done this his entire career
so it’s not surprising to me. It’s really mostly pointless to run picks for Brandon
"Well, you can always sell your team."
yeah, have always noticed this.
it just brings a guy up top to double team roy…
nobody on the blazers does this
its a sad combination of ballhandler failure and screensetter failure.
'Dre does, his PnRs with LMA are intricate (they take what the defenders give them)
Rudy runs wide like Brandon, then throws the no-look lob (when it’s there)
Otherwise, Portland has no PnR. That’s a huge disadvantage in the playoffs
I once had high hopes for Bayless and Oden, so much for that
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
you can say that, again
it bears repeating
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I only saw the 4th Q
But there was something different this game I liked a lot.
A) The defensive scheme looked diifferent; the perimeter defense was tightened up. Kidd hit that one open 3 late to get within 3point, but it was a mixed-up assignment
B) Roy did something with the ball every time he got it. He was looking to score and not dribble for 12 seconds then pass off. He had one particular catch & shoot where he literally hoisted the shot a slpit-second receiving the pass. I can’t remember when he last did that. Roy looked to make a play immediately, and went from passive to aggressive. Lightbulb moment for him??
C) Seemed like Miller was dancing more on the outside, looking to penetrate more. There was a constant stream of High Pick & Roll, and it got us good shots. As I’ve kept advocating, run those plays more often because Miller is an excellent passer and will make plays for you when he has room. Often, he needs the P & R to generate that space.
Excellent game overall. Glad Matthews showed and tore it up early. REALLY hope the Blazers can stick to the new meme here.
2011 NFL Draft - Doplhins
Trade Down from #15
1st - 1a) Colin Kaepernick, 1b) Ryan Mallett (QB)
'Dre is the only Blazer who knows how to run the PnR, from various angles
but the Mavericks have multiple players who can do it as well, or better
one of the replays showed the Blazers stuffing a PnR with Kidd-Dirk on the right side, only to have the Mavs swing the ball to the left and start a second PnR with Terry handling the ball, without missing a beat
Dallas isn’t going to win anything this year, but they are light years ahead of Portland re: playoff coaching and veteran execution
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Gotta give Nate credit too
It looks like he made some changes to the defensive scheme, and maybe (speculation) he convinced Roy he’s gotta be the scorer?? He was definitely different.
2011 NFL Draft - Doplhins
Trade Down from #15
1st - 1a) Colin Kaepernick, 1b) Ryan Mallett (QB)
My favorite moment was the crowd chanting "LETS GO BLAZERS!" through the Dallas introductions.
Classic RG.
Stealth > Wealth
that was totally cool
it showed that the fans were into supporting our team, and didn’t even care who they were opposing
it really set the tone for an electric evening at the RG
Win the day!
Coffee is for Closers!
Always Be Closing!
I knew I would cheer for Roy
but hearing 20,000 others join in was a goosebump moment for me. That and the escalating cheers after Wes’s 3rd and 4th 3s were just awesome.
\\oo///
I joined in every single cheer, despite the cough I'm fighting.
Learning to chant from the stomach instead of the chest has saved me this season.
Stealth > Wealth
Cuban was hit in the face with a projectile?
You expect me to believe that a fan, presumably from behind him, threw or somehow launched a projectile, that went past him, turned, in mid air mind you, and came back and hit him in the face? That, my friends, is one magic projectile.
by TimG on Apr 22, 2011 8:16 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
BLOG LINKS BLAZER FAN TO GRASSY KNOLL
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
Was Keith Hernandez anywhere in the stands?
There had to have been a second spitter, behind the bushes, on the gravelly road.
It was Patty...
with a boomerang.
Stealth > Wealth
by 500dogs on Apr 22, 2011 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Cuban was turned around, standing, facing the crowd when I saw him on TV
talking with or yelling at them or whatever. Hard to tell if it was goodnatured or not. Maybe not.
ignacio
Yeah, I love/hate Mark Cuban.
He is annoying, and I love to hate him, but at the same time, there’s something just really funny and awesome about a billionaire owner who goes to the ROSE GARDEN and sits in the stands and gets into it with fans.
On the other hand, I doubt whatever was thrown at him was dangerous or really bad, at least I hope so. Man, I would LOVE to see video of him making remarks to the fans and then getting hit in the face with like a crumpled up wrapper or something and whipping his head around and staring… that would be the best ever.
I was right behind Cuban13 rows back, he's classless
He right behind their bench, not in the crowd. Sitting on a pile of folded towels (no phone books available) And he was taunting the fans, who taunted him back. Seemed like he enjoyed it as much as we did, honestly. Great fun for all. I thought about taking a video, should have done that. Did not see him hit with anything, but once in 3rd quarter something did fly by my head on the way down, which landed at least 50 feet from him, maybe a crumpled up napkin, nothing that could hurt anyone.
Don’t understand how he can be screaming at LMA while he’s shooting a free throw, maybe not illegal but so pathetic. And screaming at the refs, too
And I’m sure he Mavs coaches enjoy Cuban signaling plays to them..“yes sir, more Dirk, will get right on that”
that's how MC gets his kicks
just like a pro baseball player caught stealing $60 worth of T-shirts, from Macy’s
the NBA gives Mark an adrenaline rush. It used to do the same for Paul Allen, when he was younger—and probably still does to a lesser degree
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
no doubt about it
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
i wondered about this in the gdt last night
but did brandon have his knees drained before the game yesterday? those legs looked awfully spry.
PHILLY!
Congrats Roy!
Less talk, more action. Do what you can do and roll with it.
Ruudster
Ben has no class
Anyone notice Ben was sending tweets rippin’ on BRoy during the game? Roy comes in and plays his heart out and almost at the same time, Ben is being a jerk through Twitter. It boggles my mind.
Ben, I know you dont read or care what we think, but I found that very classless (as did everyone in my home during the game).
We all Love B-Roy, but....
Come on now! I couldn’t resist posting after reading some of the ‘I told ya so’ comments regarding Brandon Roy. Are you serious? Just look at the stats on one Brandon Roy in the 2011 playoffs: 6 PPG! That is enough said! Yes, Brandon had a good game last night, we can all agree on that, but in the latter part of this season tell me when Brandon Roy had good back to back games. He hasn’t. Unfortunately, Nate is going to go to that well repeatedly tomorrow, and that well is going to be dry.
Sorry to say it Blazer fans, which I am one, but that is the reality. Yes, I think the Blazers played well, at times, Thursday night, but doing that twice at home and expecting wins is not reality. They have to play much better. Yes, the pick and roll defense was better last night, but they still had breakdowns with that….recall Dirk with a free stroll to the hoop in the fourth quarter?
Remember this, Wes had 16 points going into the 2nd quarter, and yet we didn’t see him until the 9 minute mark. Why is that? The same reason the Western Conference Coach Of The Month allows Golden State to come into their home court and blow them out. It will happen.
pissin' in my cheerios
Seriously? If you want to complain, at least do it after a loss, damn.
We all love Wes, but he shows up 1qtr at a time. It was a blessing to have Roy come pick up the slack while Wes rested. Take it for what it is and give off Roy/Nate’s back.
by ItsMrHarris2u on Apr 22, 2011 9:18 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
he's right though
Look at BRoy’s game log since he’s returned from the extended rest period. The odds are that he’ll shoot 20% for 7 points. When Brandon entered and Wes sat, the plus/minus went from plus6 to minus11. Oops. Wes came in and PDX promptly went on a 14-4 run (plus 10). The real problem was the 2nd half when Wes basically disappeared for the rest of the game (3 points minus8, 2nd half)
Yo, I don't really care
As long as the Blazers are in the W column I don’t care about plus minus or what have you. B Roy and everyone else showed up, played hard, played aggressive, and won.
Blazers fan since '91
REST IN PEACE MAURICE LUCAS 1952-2010 R.I.P #20
"We're family because of this stupid, stinkin' team." - Dave
by rise_stand_resist on Apr 22, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
it gave some people rest...the 4th quarter turnovers/losses may be due to fatigue
as much as anything else.
Somewhere watching at home, Joel Przybilla started a drinking game — take a shot every time Chandler commits a foul, chug when he scowls on his way back to the bench — and is now really drunk and loving life.
I was just thinking about Joel this morning, he’s got to be watching the series back in Wisconsin and rooting for Portland. (And thinking about what he would be doing out on the floor to help the team win, if he was still able.) I hope someone like Barrett catches up with Przy and takes his temp re: his offseason/career plans, and then shares the interview in a blog this summer
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I'd be down to swoop him back up,
I mean assuming he recovers halfway decent. Even if his role is just to come in and play a physical tough 10 or 15 minutes and use his fouls.
So I sat in the 300 level for the first time and I must say, I hope that the sound over the
speakers is not always that loud…During the player intro I could not even tell if it was music they were playing because it was so insanely loud. Deafening crowd = awesome. Deafening (music?) over the loudspeakers = not so awesome.
With Russ Humberston, you can't miss.
by BlazerBlazerBlazerBlazer on Apr 22, 2011 9:47 AM PDT reply actions
welcome to arena ops since the late '90s
good luck having a conversation with your guest. It’s a 3-ring circus and the show must go on
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I sat in the 300 level 20 times this year
I never had a huge issue with any sound other than the Denver game when Roy and Rudy hit the miracle 3’s.
Just throwing this out there... HACK a HAYWOOD
Seriously though with about 5 mins left Dallas started hitting their shots and going to dirk. They were already over the limit. I found my self wishing we would just foul Haywood, then take the ball down and use the whole shot clock before out shot.. Then foul him again and keep doing that… No way he scores 10 points of free throws. Anyone else start wishing for that?
I thought that was brilliant.
Milk the clock, foul Haywood, he bricks a couple free throws. Rinse and repeat, outside of Dirk being Dirk, and we win.
Blazers fan since '91
REST IN PEACE MAURICE LUCAS 1952-2010 R.I.P #20
"We're family because of this stupid, stinkin' team." - Dave
by rise_stand_resist on Apr 22, 2011 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions
And chandler was out... so they couldn't really sub him out.
I honestly have alot more faith in Haywood missing free throws than i do Dirk missing a shot or not getting to the line. The guy shoots 38% from the line… seems like a solid play… not sure why Nate refuses to use it
Nate respects the game too much
MIke Dunleavy, OTOH, would be all over that idea
and no, I’m not saying I want a reprise of the Dunderhead in Portland
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
respect the game? the playoff's are about winning... there have been coaches that have used that in the past and never had their "respect" questioned.
Most of the time its looked at as a good strategy. If the player can’t hit free throws thats the players problem, not a disrespect for the game. If you ask me its a disrespect to the game that a professional player that gets paid millions can’t hit a free throw over 50%
can you still do that?
i thought they did some sort of rule change that makes it a tech to do intentional off the ball fouls late in the game to prevent hack-a-shaq. is that true?
Roy was careful to caution those present that he isn’t guaranteeing a repeat of his Game 3 performance
We should all recognize this, by now. Appreciate the “good Roy nights” when they come, but don’t expect them to come every game. (Or even 2 out of 3) It’s up to Nate to do the #7 temp check and go in a different direction when Brandon is not in his rhythm. I think the coach understands this, but following game 1 it was hard to tell
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Brandons "good night"
Will come much more often if he continues with the Scorer’s mentality and ditches the PG mentality. It’s up to him.
2011 NFL Draft - Doplhins
Trade Down from #15
1st - 1a) Colin Kaepernick, 1b) Ryan Mallett (QB)
for once I agree with Rice
during the telecast the wild one was saying that Roy needed to be in the game with Andre (how’s that for irony, with their history of “bad fit” backcourt?) because Brandon needed a PG to feed him the ball, so he could concentrate on scoring
what the Blazers need is a veteran backup PG. Cho didn’t acquire one so they’re getting torched by JJ Barea and/or Jason Terry. Playing shooting guards as PGs is such a bad idea in a playoff series, although I think even Jerryd Bayless would have been more consistently productive that Roy or Rudy in that role (ref: last April’s series against the Suns, Rex had better stats than ever)
Oh well, there’s a hole in this roster that’s too late to fill. Maybe Armon will be a difference-maker in the future, but the rookie from the WAC has a whole lot to learn, and there’s no summer league to aid in his development, this offseason
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Reggie Jackson could be a target in the draft....
Great physical tools and an improving floor general and 3pt shooter.
I’m with you though. A vet back-up is the way to go here. I think it’s going to have to come in a trade though because the free agent crop of PG’s is very thin next year. The best imo being Earl Watson.
I was in favor of adding Earl last summer
and that was before Bayless was dealt away
starting the season with Mills and AJ backing up Miller was bad enough. Nate may have thought he could get enough PG play out of Roy and Rudy. For Cho to let the deadline pass by without adding a veteran PG (there was talk of interest in TJ Ford, etc) was unconscionable. It set the team up for playoff scoring droughts, and to be beaten off the dribble by backups like Barea and Terry
If Rich could flip Patty and Rudy for a steady backup veteran combo 1/2 the bench would be far better off. Meanwhile, they’re just playing Russian roulette that ’Dre will stay healthy and remain productive
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
i think that they need to suck it up this offseason.
and finally go get a good young point guard prospect to bring off the bench and learn from miller… someone who will definitely be at least a solid point guard in this league, no more guys who “might pan out” – a real blue chip guy.
it would be hard to get and expensive, but that would really set us up. i don’t have an exact target, but a good example would be ty lawson a couple of years ago. he was still a bit green and playing behind a veteran, but you knew it was just a matter of time.
in this scenario, you could still hang on to mills as a 3rd point guard.
it’s always good to have a decent 3rd point guard on the roster in case of injuries. i think that’s where patty is at this point in his career. maybe in a couple of seasons he could develop into solid backup behind our future point.
The guys who were questioning how better the Blazers PNR D really was.....
According to synergy sports, Dallas was combined 11-15 with 3 to’s on pnr ball handler and pnr roll man plays.
Camby’s pnr D has been terrible all series but it has never been that great. He just tends stay attached to his man , especially if it’s Nowitzki, and provide little help to his teammates who are fighting over picks. Wes Matthews was getting ripped for letting Kidd get off in game 2 in pnr plays but almost all of those involved Camby not helping him out AT ALL.
Aldridge is doing a little better, but I want to see him hedge a lot harder like we saw early in the first quarter. It’s then up to rest of the guys to rotate accordingly buy it just seems that Portland for the most part is trying to stay with Dallas’ shooters and instead try defend pnr plays with only 2 guys.
That’s tough to do, but it’s really pick your poison with these Mavericks and that’s what makes them such a tough guard.
I remember Oden hedging too much and getting call for fouls
back when Greg was healthy
the best at it was Juwan Howard, of all people
AK1984 (and Dwight Jaynes) are right about one thing, it’s a team/coaching deficiency. It’s hard for me to blame the players for following the gameplan, if that’s what they’re indeed doing
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Dear Nate,
Rudy can’t play point guard. Neither can B Roy. Please wake up and start playing people in their natural positions—or don’t play them at all. Thanks.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 11:27 AM PDT reply actions
So you're in favor of Patty getting minutes...
He looked bad in the short stint he was given in game 2.
Well let's face it:
he can’t possibly be worse than Rudy on offense or B Roy on defense. At least he can laterally cover Berea and close out on Peja without looking like he’s going to strain a hamstring getting there.
His ball handling keeps the tempo to the Blazers’ liking, and Camby/Wallace can set up the offense from the top of the key.
I think the backup PG should get minutes with LaMarcus in there so that the bench offense doesn’t completely bog down like it has 80% of the series thus far. Rest Andre first, sub him back in with B Roy for Patty and LaMarcus, and go with B Roy at 2 while Lamarcus rests.
Also, Dirk plays the entire 4th quarter of games. Effectively. Why Nate feels the need to keep Lamarcus, Andre, and Wallace out for huge chunks of the final frame is beyond me. His sub patterns just don’t make sense.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
At least he can laterally cover Berea
No, he can’t. Mills was not effective at guarding JJ during the regular season. At all
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
He'd be A LOT better than B Roy.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions
JJ blew by Patty in the short time he played in game two
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Brandon was trying to guard Marion
and Dallas went right to that matchup
lets face it, there isn’t a Mav’s player that Roy can adequately defend, not even Peja
adding Mills to the lineup just punches another hole in the dike
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
what's the other option?
I think Roy should bring it up (good dribbler) and Rudy could initiate (excellent passer)
#7
by collectiveshane on Apr 22, 2011 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Neither handle ball pressure very well
and B Roy CANNOT guard Berea or Terry. I’d argue Rudy has his own problems with Terry, but who doesn’t…
Dallas essentially plays 2 point guards at all times, except for the beginning of quarters 1 and 3.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Portland essentially playes 2 two guards at all times,
except for when Andre is in there, which isn’t often enough IMO. Their attempts to overwhelm Dallas’ guards with post ups yield stagnation in the offense more than they yield points. What—are we trying to foul out Berea? Why? What a stupid strategy. Similarly, Wallace cannot post up Kidd enough to justify moving to a strict 1-on-1 offense.
Stick to a real point guard and the purposeful motion in the offense that gets Lamarcus position and guys open on the perimeter. Stop worrying about playing Rudy and Brandon’s bruised ego.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
My suggestion
stagger the minutes between Miller and Wallace so that Gerald can bring the ball up the floor whenever ’Dre is not in the game
Crash isn’t the greatest ball-handler, but he’s not being defended by a quick guard, either
BTW, this strategy is similar to Gene Shue using Caldwell Jones to bring the ball up the floor in the 1977 finals, because Bibby/Collins/Free were being hounded by Portland’s defensive pressure (Hollins and Davis, especially)
the real problem is that the front office dropped the ball and didn’t acquire a veteran backup PG back when they had the opportunity. So here we sit, white-knuckling playoff possessions without a steady hand running the offense, while watching the opponent’s PGs slice and dice Portland’s interior defense
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Agreed. Backup PG is killing this team's potential bench production.
Dallas has a cohesive unit. Portland has a few individuals held together precariously by a few pieces of duct tape and several spit wads donated from the Blazer fans seated in the section behind the Mavericks’ bench.
Advantage: Mavs.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Apr 22, 2011 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Chinese fire drill
Portland scores at random based largely on effort and athleticism, especially once Miller leaves the floor
I don’t ever want to be a Dallas fan, but it’s easy to see how they know what they’re doing on offense, a least most of the time. On the one hand they should be more cohesive, they have veteran players who have been together awhile, and Carlisle has now coached 81 playoff games.
OTOH, I keep waiting for some of Nate and the Blazer player’s past experience to start showing up in more consistent/intelligent play, but (much like the 1990-1992 Blazers, under Adelman) much effort and athleticism is required to eke out playoff victories
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
I cant wait for tomorrows game! last nights game could of went in a few directions. without wes’s threes and kidd being ice cold..man they are killing us on pick and roll I was hoping for a cleaer victory heres hoping Saturdays game is more impressive..its a game we can still easily lose
I don't care how they win
just win
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 22, 2011 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Mav's age
I’m curious to see how their bodies hold up as the series continues. We win this next one at home and make sure they take a physical toll while playing it, they might be tired enough for us to steal that next game. Granted we are talking about professional athletes so I’m not banking all my hopes on this theory but it’s been 85 games since the season opening tip. How are 86 and 87 going to feel?
at least 1 day off between games
and longer (TV) timeouts during the games
the playoffs are actually easier for veteran teams than the regular season
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!

by 































