Blazers vs. Mavericks: The Matchups
Yesterday we took a look at the statistical battle between the Trail Blazers and Mavericks. Today we're going to delve into particular players and the problems they pose. As many of you know I am not a big fan of the "PF: LaMarcus Aldridge vs. Dirk Nowitzki" style of analysis. Dirk Nowitzki will will physically matched up with LaMarcus Aldridge AND Nicolas Batum AND Marcus Camby AND Gerald Wallace and regularly might face a different player on either end of the floor. Instead we're going to approach this from the individual point of view: What does each player bring to the table and how might the other team look to combat or mute those strengths?
DALLAS
Dirk Nowitzki 23 ppg, 7rpg, 52% shooting
Nowitzki is the key to this series for both the Mavericks and Blazers. Let Dirk go unchecked and Portland will have a hard time winning, not just because of his offensive prowess but because he's good at spotting open teammates created by defensive attention to him. Contain Dirk and the Mavericks will have a difficult time generating enough offense to take the series.
Dallas may be a half man short on offense because of Tyson Chandler's limitation but Nowitzki pretty much makes up for that missing half. He's a fantastic shooter, too tall to get his shot blocked. He's almost freakishly poised. It's like the bad-shot-against-the-clock fairy landed on his shoulder and said, "Oh Dirkie, I will bless you with magical charms so that horrible shots for everyone else in the league become swishes from your hands." His lean-back jumper is just plain sick. If he shoots with 1 second left on the timer it's going in.
The Blazers' first line of defense will be denial. They're going to try and keep the ball out of Dirk's hands and take their chances with everyone else. Failing that they'll try to bother him if he puts the ball on the floor, poking hands into the 7-footer's dribble. Nicolas Batum is probably the best guy for either task. Batum doesn't have a prayer of bothering the jumper but who does?
Another tactic will be to work Dirk on the other end. The Mavs might try to switch him away from the action, perhaps watching Marcus Camby instead of Aldridge. This is where I'd expect to see a smaller, scoring-heavy frontcourt, making him choose between Aldridge and Gerald Wallace. The Blazers should give the ball to whoever he guards. Let them try to go around him, out-muscle him, and especially draw fouls.
Click through for the rundown on the rest of the Mavericks and the Blazer lineup as well.
Jason Terry 16 ppg, 4 apg
Terry has slowed down as he's aged. He's no longer a threat to drop 30 on you or even 20 most nights. He topped 25 only three times this year. He's Dallas' second most prolific three-point shooter behind Jason Kidd, though his average is lower than any of their volume trey takers. In short, his game has become jumper-oriented and, for the most part, average. Portland's defenders, now populating the second unit as well as the first, should eat him up. The Blazers also possess a significant height advantage against Terry and should look to abuse him thereby.
Shawn Marion 12.5 ppg, 7 rpg, 52% shooting
Marion is as efficient in this year's offense as he's ever been in his career. At 10.4 attempts per game he's just not gotten the opportunities he used to. His three-point shot, never a thing of beauty but formerly deadly, has gone to pot. He's still great on the break but he doesn't have the horses to run with him. He brings unique athleticism to Dallas' attack but it's sometimes wasted. Fortunately he's reinvented himself by finding seams and looking great on his shorter jump shots. If there's a breakout possibility for the Mavs in this series it's Marion. And make no mistake, Marion could potentially send the Blazers packing. He won't win the series by himself but he could deliver the knockout punch while Nowitzki holds the Blazers' arms behind their backs. Portland will need to keep Marion outside, playing him for the drive first. Despite his explosive potential the Blazers might also be content with keeping the ball in his hands as he's not an avid passer and his offense tends to suffer when he stalls and dribbles. They'll need to watch him on the offensive glass. Best guess: the Blazers are fully aware of Marion but aren't going to be afraid of him until he proves he can hurt them.
Jason Kidd 8 ppg, 8 apg, 1.7 spg
Jason Kidd used to be an "everything but the three-pointer" kind of player. Now he's a three-point specialist. I kidd you not. 5 of his 7.5 shot attempts per game are from distance. He shoots 34% from the arc, 36% overall. He's not getting to the bucket, he's not getting open and converting on picks, he's shooting the long ball. That says volumes about his speed and explosiveness at this stage of his career. He is as savvy as he ever was, though. He'll trick you with the pass and the steal. He's got a mind for offense like nobody else on this team. His brain remains his greatest defensive asset as well and, unlike the other Mavericks guards, he has size to make up for his fading maneuverability. Kidd won't turn the series for the Mavs but he's unlikely to lose it for them either. The Blazers want to keep him moving. They'll also counter with a pretty smart point guard of their own.
Tyson Chandler 10 ppg, 9.5 rpg
Chandler is the only Maverick of size likely to cause the Blazers trouble and that trouble comes almost exclusively in the rebounding department. He has the ability to clean up the boards and thus keep the Blazers from their possession-oriented gameplan. The best solution has always been to take it right at him, occupying his mind with other things besides glass cleaning. He's a good defender but a mediocre shot blocker. If you drive it right into his body he'll not stop you and will probably pick up a foul. If you get nose to nose with him for rebounds he'll likely freak out. He's like a big, tough-looking dog that shuffles off when actual fights come around. If the Blazers refuse to be intimidated by him they should be OK. Even better, Chandler presents the Mavericks with a serious quandary on the defensive end if the Blazers run a Wallace-Aldridge frontcourt. Which one of those does Chandler watch? Either way he has to get outside of the lane, lessening his rebounding ability and allowing those all-important offensive rebounds for the Blazers. He's not going to burn either smaller defender on the offensive end either. He hits every shot he takes but he only takes 5.5 per game because if it's not a layup it's not in his comfort zone. Dallas' best plan in such an eventuality would be to sit Chandler but he's literally all the muscle they have outside of the mercurial Marion. They'll not rebound or play strong without him. Portland should look to exploit the big guy at every opportunity and watch Dallas try to compensate.
The Rest: Jose Juan Barea, Peja Stojakovic, Rodrigue Beaubois, DeShawn Stevenson, Brendan Haywood, Corey Brewer
There's some promise in this group, a little history, but not much explosive or dependable. Barea can shoot but Portland also demonstrated in their last game against Dallas that they're more than willing to post him up every time down the floor, breaking the Dallas defense. Stojakovic hasn't been scary for four years. Beaubois holds most of the promise, occasionally piping up with a stellar game. The Blazers will live with one of those in this series and won't worry unless he shows he can beat them every game. Haywood has been anemic this year, Stevenson has been anemic forever, and the next time Corey Brewer wins a game for his team will be the first. They've got skills, athleticism, and size mixed into this group but those attributes are spread too thinly among its various members. Each guy should have moment to shine but the Blazers should be able to counter whichever player gets thrown out there. Let's put it this way...if the Blazers can handle Nowitzki none of these guys are going to make a difference. If they can't handle Dirk he's going to make all of these guys look their best.
PORTLAND
LaMarcus Aldridge 22ppg, 9rpg, 50% shooting
Aldridge's offense has leaped forward this year, becoming as scary as Nowitzki's in many ways, if not as varied. Mixing in the pick and pop with a little post play has created a flood of opportunities on the strong side of the floor, which in turn has led to more opportunities for Portland's weak-side shooters. The Mavs will try to key on Aldridge the same way the Blazers are keying on Dirk. LaMarcus will be tested with double teams, having to prove his ability to attack with the pass. The alley-oop will be scouted, the pick and pop closed on, the post moves swarmed as soon as he puts the ball on the floor. Aldridge is tall and quick enough that some of this will be in vain. He needs to score in this series and understand that his aggression is Portland's best hope for winning, maybe their only hope in that his offense creates everyone else's open looks. If he plays like a mouse the Blazers will be trapped and disposed of. Portland needs its lion to roar. But Aldridge also has to find and trust his teammates...a quality which led to plenty of late-season wins for the Blazers. If the offense gets bogged down to LMA only Portland won't generate enough pressure on Dallas' defense to tire them or rotate them out of position to create easy looks, fouls, and rebounding opportunities. It's a tricky balance and Portland must find it early in the series.
Gerald Wallace 16 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 2.0 spg, 50% shooting (as a Blazer)
Mr. Do-Everything is going to be a handful for the Mavericks, especially since most of the defensive attention will be devoted to Aldridge. We said Shawn Marion had explosive, break-the-game potential. Wallace breaks everything he touches. He's not always on but when he is Portland becomes hard to defend. His combination of distance shooting, driving, passing, and strength makes him a tough cover. His will to defend and rebound plus his propensity for steals makes him equally dangerous on the other end. The best guess is that the Mavs will play against the drive, making Wallace show multiple times that his sterling shooting during his Portland tenure is for real. They also have some hope on the other end, depending on Marion's athleticism and Nowitzki's height to counter the famed GW defense. The Mavs have to get a great showing out of Marion if they're going to make this series easy. The danger for them is that showing being matched by Wallace and thus rendered neutral at best. In that sense Wallace is Portland's king-maker behind Aldridge's throne.
Andre Miller 13 ppg, 7 apg
Miller is Portland's veteran point guard countering Jason Kidd. Neither player is what they once were but Miller is probably closer. He's got scoring ability, passing acumen, and enough bulk and strength to not be intimidated by his counterpart. His great intangibles are his unflappability and timing. He's not in the position of winning games for the Blazers but he subtly saves them with a timely shot or incisive pass. He knows just when to execute each. His defense is his weak point and should the Blazers match him up against Terry the Mavs should take a run at him. Forcing him outside is desirable and Kidd is capable of that. Miller has been an advantage for the Blazers in most games this year but just as Wallace does with Marion, Kidd may nullify Portland's Miller edge.
Wesley Matthews 16 ppg, 41% 3pt shooting
Matthews is Portland's second-leading scorer on the season. He's good at getting his jumper off. He's an able defender, particularly against quick players. His main fault is inconsistency. The Blazers badly need his shooting and his points. He's intermittent in delivering. When he's on he's fantastic. When he's off it's like he doesn't exist. He doesn't fill up the stat line in other ways either...it's mostly feast or famine. Matthews will be called upon to contain any Dallas guard who gets hot regardless of size or position. The Mavericks, in return, should simply keep a hand in his face and invite him to take the ball inside. He drives like a Britney Spears divorce. Everybody sees it coming. If Dallas can take Matthews out of the equation the Blazers are suddenly unstable on offense, scrambling to find a substitute for those points. All of their backup plans lack defense, so Dallas ends up ahead. This may be the place at which the Blazers are the most vulnerable.
Nicolas Batum 12.5 ppg, 4,5 rpg
Batum will likely draw plenty of time on Nowitzki in this series. He'll also be asked to drive on and shoot over any defender Dallas puts in his way besides Shawn Marion. (If Marion is watching Batum then Wallace will be set loose.) If Aldridge is the key and Matthews the vulnerable point, Batum is the wildcard. He'll not lose the series with a bad performance but a great one could push Portland over the top, finally breaking the dam that Aldridge and Wallace will hammer at. If Dirk manages to get Batum in foul trouble, though, the Blazers may be thin on substitutes. Even if they don't, Batum has been prone to vacillations as wide as Matthews'. The Blazers cannot afford 8 point, 4 rebound nights from Nicolas no matter who he's guarding. Portland will have to be great to win this series and they're not great when Batum becomes invisible. Dallas would be well-advised to try and foul Batum to the bench, particularly if he's guarding Nowitzki. If he's guarding Marion then Shawn should try to overpower him. Denying Batum the ball on the offensive end may encourage him to fade. He still doesn't perform well under serious defensive pressure in any case. He needs openings in order to be effective and he doesn't create them as much as take advantage of them. Dallas will probably keep a wary eye on him.
The Rest: Brandon Roy, Marcus Camby, Rudy Fernandez, Patty Mills
On the surface these names look plenty good. In reality this group is thin and shaky. Roy has an awesome reserve of talent but still looks like a shell of the player he once was. Yet finding his way among roles and teammates, he looks and plays lost. Dallas should make him prove he can score with authority before even considering double teaming him. They should also drive right at him when he defends. Camby gives Portland those all-important rebounds but hasn't come back fully from injury and doesn't give the Blazers a ton of minutes. Fernandez is a wandering desert punctuated by the occasional blessed oasis. He plays energetically and can spark a game but his once-lauded three-point shot is completely erratic now and he still doesn't bring enough on defense to bother a good team like Dallas, save perhaps on those occasions when he goes bonkers with steals. Mills provides instant offense for both teams. All in all this is probably a better bench group than Dallas fields but it isn't as deep and isn't anywhere near dependable enough to lean on as a series-changer. The Mavericks will probably be happy to get to these guys.
These teams are intriguing. It's not just a matter of who they've got. This series is too close to call on talent. It will be decided by how that talent plays. This is where Dallas' experience level comes into play. They already know how to do what they're attempting. The Blazers will have to figure it out on the fly. With series routinely tipping on one game, Portland will need to find direction and consistency quickly. It's not a matter of who can win but who has the focus and will to win.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
P.S. The Jersey Contest form is now available for playoff participants. If you're not on the playoff participant list please do not enter. It just confuses things for no good reason. You cannot win unless you are on the list!
147 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i'd rather feel heartbreak than not be on this blazers optimist-train
blazers in 5
Resident Smartass.
and my residency is Blazersedge.com
It has the same number of syllables.
"I can't recommend highly enough going back and watching old clips of Jose Lopez." -Jeff Sullivan
timbers fan, are we?
good game last night.
Q: "Why are the Heat losing?"
'Dre: "That's for them to figure out. We did our job."
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Apr 15, 2011 10:54 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
My emotional memories
consider Jason Terry as a Blazerkiller. Maybe our defenders cheat off of him too much in their defensive schemes, but I always remember him hitting key shots against the blazers down the stretch. Average or not, I think he’s a huge X-factor in this series.
And I’m starting a movement to call the Alley and Oop part of our favorite offensive play as the “Rip” and the “City” or the “L-” and the “Train”. Just don’t confuse the two and call it the L-City. :)
Honestly, I think the Alley Oop play will be scouted before the 1st game.
Those showy plays will get scouted easy. The Mavs will have that on the top of their defensive thought list. Truer X and O plays with multiple scoring options will be more efficient against this Mavs team.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
In reality the Alley-oop play is just a back door dunk.
Walton made Bobby Gross famous with the back door uncontested plays. at that time I always wondered why they never stopped Gross from doing that. then I realized that it was the intensity they put on Bill from scoring that created that. So they have their choice stop LMA LOBS or Batum and G-Man’s back door dunks. As long as they are trying to stop it, the weak side help defense will be lacking and that opens up the game for Dre and Matthews and LMA post moves.
hg
maybe.
but if they try to overplay the lob, it will be easier to get the ball into aldridge in the post – or someone else will be open.
the lob isn’t usually a play that’s called as a first option, it’s often an option to deal with team’s trying to front or deny the post to aldridge. if aldridge’s defender stays home between aldridge and the bucket, he can focus on sealing off for the pass in deep post posiition where he is deadly.
if they tried to have one man fronting and another guy behind to deny and prevent the lob, bring in batum for camby and they’ll be leaving either wallace or batum wide open with the ball still in miller’s hands – that wouldn’t work out too well.
by SaveOden on Apr 15, 2011 4:49 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
The lob definitely is not a first option play
but Chandler and Haywood, maybe Dirk will be aware of it. And look to deny the pass upon entry into the post after LMA rolls off, which is the typical scenario when LMA has low post position. They will look to disrupt the pass, mostlikely on LMA’s end versus Andre’s end. I’d like to see Wallace do more high low lobs with LMA. That should throw the defense off. Camby’s high low would be nice to see again but the defense should know to look out for it. But could be nice with Dallas front line stretched out to the perimeter.
Speaking of which, I’d really like to see Camby get aggressive on offense. Either by shooting that weird jumper or taking it to the hoop down the middle, which always seems to throw defenses off.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
Agreed, if Camby got more aggressive in scoring that would take the heat off of LMA
That was the reason for the small line-up. The Offense was leaving Camby and focusing on LMA. with G-man and Batum in at the same time, they can’t do that. Therefore the answer is for Camby to get more involved on the offensive end. that drive up the middle was simple and had devastating effects
hg
IF he hits his shots
His shot, even right at the rim has been VERY shaky this year. He even seems to have trouble with marginally contested layups. But yeah, if he even puts a few buckets in it can help spread the D. I just see Dallas living with his percentage unless he’s hitting better than he’s shown he can this year.
by Dunemonkey on Apr 15, 2011 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
leveraging the cut as a post-position move is exactly how LMA needs to play
requires good timing and positioning by his teammates as well, so that LMA can receive the ball with maximum leverage. If the Blazers try to post LMA but have to hold the ball while he gets pushed out of the post, the Blazers will be lucky to score 90.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
gonna be hard to elimitate that play
the lob is a response to fronting Aldridge. especially Dallas who will have a hard time checking him in the low post. more than likely they will front and just have to cheat the weak side help a little more. but that leaves opportunities for other players to make the backdoor cuts and open jumpers. its not simply scouting that prevents the lob…you telling me that no team in the league scouts during the regular season? of course they do, and they find that it is easier to double and deny LMA by fronting.
by SuperFan #7 on Apr 15, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions
this
LMA catches those lob passes really high up. Chandler probably has the best chance of picking them off but it still puts major pressure on the defense.
Front LMA and he’ll fight for position a little farther away and turn it into a spin lob…or even a fade away. Don’t front LMA and he gets deep post position and someone gets an easy post entry pass.
Body LMA and he drags you out of the paint and runs through a high screen for pick and pop or to get someone else open…or just to pull a big out of the paint for guys like Crash, Wes and Dre.
Dallas going to a zone should be an effective way to counter that play, as well as force Portland ...
to shoot over the top rather than go to LMA inside. Another option would be to have someone with length like Tyson Chandler — or even Dirk Nowitzki — front LaMarcus Aldridge and deny the entry pass.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
The oop happens when the defender fronts too aggressively
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Apr 15, 2011 8:21 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
teams have been cheating off the weakside wing to help with fronting
that cheating needs to be exploited by quick ball reversal and hard drives/cuts. The other way to exploit the front/cheat backside help is simply to post out of the pick and roll or post off weakside screens (a frequent LMA technique).
Another potential strategy is to run LMA off multiple screens like they do the wings, forcing the Dallas frontcourt defenders to try and track a much more mobile LMA all over the court…
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions
True
And in no known universe will Dirk or Chandler be that helpside wing.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Apr 15, 2011 12:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Shawn Marion can provide that weakside help, though.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
"Another potential strategy is to run LMA off multiple screens like they do the wings ..."
I highly doubt Nate will run LMA off of staggered screens, so Dallas shouldn’t worry about that.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
I doubt he will do
but watching Dirk or Chandler try to chase LMA would be priceless
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions
"to"
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions
We can't settle for outside jumpers
If I correctly recall we pushed tempo against the Mav’s last time we played them so that they didn’t have time to set-up the zone. I wasn’t able to catch the whole game, but I imagine pushing the tempo was effective.
zone doesnt really stop that play.
the weak side help still has to watch his 3 seconds. in college that works great, pros not so much.
they are still going to have to double and that causes the zone to collapse. plus if you have a good pg (Andre) who can maintain his dribble and penetrate the zone…not to mention lots of 3 point shooters…and a high post C (Camby) who can pass very well, the zone has lots of problems against this team.
by SuperFan #7 on Apr 15, 2011 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
It is a matter of attacking and getting the ball to LMA in a variety of ways
Not just the predictable low post and Lob. I saw the pick and oit resul;ted in a nice array of jump shopts that compliment his low post within the flow of the game. I truly think the multiple ways we go to LMA are as important as going to him. If we do it right, he is either a 40 point scorer or gets 10 assists per game. His legs should be rested and he should be welcoming putting the team on his back.
Another thought I have is we put more prssure on the Mavs with LMA, Wallace and Batum starting than with Camby. I’d give Camby some time to get ready for the second round. i am not married to this last thought. And i don’t mean don’t play him at all. It is simply my current thought on him!
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 15, 2011 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions
IMO, this is LMA version 3...
Where we actually are ok with his jump shots because they complinment him going to the basket and create more headaches for the other team.
Last year in the Pheonix series, you could see they were tryiong to force the ball to LMA before it was even inbounded. This resulted in quick double teams that frustrated him. This year, the complexity of how we go to him can create the frustration for the other team.
I am all for LMA putting this series on his shoulders. He has had a week of rest and should be to that fresh leg level he was in january/Feb. only with a better BBIQ and better supporting cast
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 15, 2011 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Regardless of the talant
Execution by the Blazers is key for them. If they get bogged down, they are in trouble. but if they keep it uptempo, Dallas age will catch up and they are in trouble. Hit them hard and don’t panic on their offensive end. Remember they made 12 consecutive baskets against us to open, but fizzled out as the game went on.
PTB need to play with intesity, focus and determination. their never die attitude is designed for that.
hg
Uptempo requires strong rebounding.
And that’s Tyson chandler’s specialty as Dave mentioned. We need some gang rebounding to help out LMa and Camby and that’s going to prevent a lot of fast breaks.
In the words of Homer Simpson
A bee bit my bottom, now my bottom is big.
by SGT Lenny on Apr 15, 2011 6:49 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
In the words of Homer:
It is not possible to fight beyond your strength, even if you strive.
Other words of Homer
“…. mmmmm ….. forbidden donut……”
Brandon Roy is The Man Your Man Could Smell Like
by Rogue Blazer on Apr 15, 2011 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
In the words of Ralph Wiggum
Tastes like burning!
Trying is the first step toward failure
No beer? Homer no function beer well without
by SGT Lenny on Apr 15, 2011 10:27 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
No beer, no TV, make Homer go...
Crazy? DON’T MIND IF I DO!
by Needsahome on Apr 15, 2011 12:49 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Blazers in 6
Let’s do this thing!
I'm gonna be the only A-hole that owns a Nic Batum jersey that doesn't live in France. Awesome.
No Caron Butler
That hurts Dallas quite a bit with our front line now being able to focus solely on Dirk. And for whatever reason Roy has had his two best showings against Dallas since the latest comeback. Calling Tyson Chandler gets tossed out of game 3, and Blazers win in 5.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Apr 15, 2011 7:05 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Has anyone seen Rudy?
Someone chain that guy to Patty Mills right now so he doesn’t run off again. If he does nothing else but stay with Jose Juan on defense, that will be a great help. No backsie offsies, please.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Apr 15, 2011 7:18 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
They need to sing that same song...
They were singing during the Memphis game
by odensraven on Apr 15, 2011 12:27 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
defending fall back jump shooters
I’ve often wondered if a quick help double team on players like Dirk and Kobe that always fade away on their shots from 10’ to 15’ wouldn’t be effective if you were to put a defender behind them or behind and to the side to block the shot from behind. Even if you put a smaller guard directly behind them, it would prevent them from doing a falling back to make space.
I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.
That's a good point.
If it could be time correctly and sneakily, it could work on one or two plays in the game.
Along the lines of the backdoor alley oop.
An adjustment is made, and the K*bes and Dirks of the world pass to someone wide open. If it’s a guard against Dallas, Terry or Kidd will be wide open to bomb threes.
Dallas is one of those teams you could rely on the zone for a while, until they can prove to beat you in the paint (IMO). Seems like what teams can do to Portland, without a ton of threat low.
Dirk is going to have big games but LMA may be able to keep it fairly even. If that’s the case the Blazers should be able to get it done in game 6.
by SGT Lenny on Apr 15, 2011 10:34 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Portland's bench
Is likely to get less minutes in a playoff rotation, I highly doubt patty mills gets that many minutes. If Rudy is also shooting poorly he could see his minutes shrink. Brandon Roy will get the backup point gaurd minutes, and some of Wesley’s minutes if he is having an off night.
The last 2
Against the Mavs, Rudy was playing some good D.
This series is making me think of the last one against the mavs when Bonzi Wells went crazy. Is that guy even in the league any more? I suppose I dont really care…
by Ansible on Apr 15, 2011 9:01 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
"Mills provides instant offense for both teams."
Best line of the article.
It says so much in that one short sentence.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
by BmoreBlazer on Apr 15, 2011 8:04 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Dallas in 5.
If I’m wrong, y’all can rip me for it.
If I’m right, I want some well-deserved respect.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
I would be absolutely shocked
If Dallas wins this series in 5, we flat out did not show up at all, and with hungry vets like Dre, Gerald, and Camby, I don’t see that happening. The post Gerald Wallace Blazers have shown themselves to be as good if not better than this Dallas team. I really like our chances in this series.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 8:51 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I gotta ask AK
Dallas is like 1-9 in its last 10 against WC playoff teams, while the Blazers have been beating those same teams with regularity since the addition of Wallace. What makes you think that Dallas will just roll through us like that? Experience?
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
Dallas has been AK's favorite team for years.
He’s lauded and/or picked them many times.
ignacio
Yeah, we ain't called Rip City for nothin.... ;-)
Prepare to be ripped, my friend.
Brandon Roy is The Man Your Man Could Smell Like
by Rogue Blazer on Apr 15, 2011 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Good psychology
If you are correct you can feel smart and if you are wrong your team wins and you’re still happy.
by Jacksonville on Apr 15, 2011 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Wow, shockingly pessimistic
Still, I don’t know that I’ll be able to dole out any respect for so negative a vibe for our boys, bold and genius though that prediction may be should it prove out.
Care to offer further analysis, or is this just a dark, shivery premonition that woke you up in a cold sweat last night?
Yeah, I agree
shockingly pessimistic. I haven’t seen anyone predict this series to end in 5 games…even the talking heads that are taking the Mavs have them in 6 or 7 and don’t feel real comfortable about it. If they take 4 of 5 from us in this series, given our roster/identity, then we just laid down and died…because if both teams play at full capacity I still like our chances. We show up hungry, focused, and confident like we should, Dallas has no chance of ending this series in 5.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
No sleep for Dunemonkey
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Unlike many, AK is good for the mea culpa if he is wrong.
I’ll give u props if u are right. I think it’s going at least 6 unless Nate really screws it up.
The cake was a lie.
did i miss something?
is dallas coached by mike fratello?
by SaveOden on Apr 15, 2011 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I disagree on attacking Roy
He never gets near corner jumpshooters so they should park at the arc and fire away when he doesn’t rotate back over to contest.
He can sometimes still do okay against a man with the ball in his hands.
dinasour type of guys choir boys
by mittsabishy on Apr 15, 2011 8:32 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
so true
and why is this? with all of the length the team has on the floor they don’t need help from the corner. never a good play and yet he drifts down there with regularity.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Apr 15, 2011 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Will Camby start or will Batum?
I Haven’t heard about the starting rotation yet. What’s the game plan?
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.
-- Scottie Pippen
Brandon Roy relegated to "the rest"
so sad. We should know (beyond doubt) where he is really at physically by the end of this series. I’m secretly hoping he has been holding back a little to save himself for the playoffs.
That's funny...cause I feel the same way in that he is holding back too
Roy says he’s feeling physically great (even stating he is 100% several times.) And to my eyes, roy’s been playing very laid back, not putting forth much effort. On top of that, if Nate knows he’s not going to play Roy much, why would he sit Roy for the last game rather than play him? Have a feeling Roy’s going to blow up this series. Roy is the secret weapon no-one’s talking about. I don’t see anyone on the Mavs that can guard him at full strength (and Roy is telling everyone he’s at full strength.) My prediction: Roy for 25pts/game in the series and we win in 5 games.
Something up McMillan's sleeves
I always hear that Nate doesn’t have the gamesmanship and what not when it comes down to winning a playoff series. I am alright with calling it far-fetched but Roy came back with a scoring vengeance and then dissapeared. My initial thought was he was feeling the pain in the knees again, but I kept noticing that he was getting to the hoop in situations where he used to shoot and then he was dishing. I even recall Mike Rice muttering something about how he should have finished one of his drives instead of laying it off. I am getting ready to throw a big told you so in all the doubters faces when he comes out of nowhere and drops big numbers. Say hello to Nate’s gamesmanship and the Natural’s return.
I shouldn't give this information
McMillan does have a trick up his sleeve.
Coach held a secret meeting with PA, at an undisclosed location prior to his contract extension. My sources tell me (Dwight Jaynes) that Nate purposefully lost the last 2 first round playoff series’ so the championship run this year would be more meaningful.
In order to avoid the L*Kers in the first round, but not the WCF, David Stern was told how the final seeding needed to be set so the referees were to call the games accordingly.
by SGT Lenny on Apr 15, 2011 10:47 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't have a source and they told me the same thing
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 15, 2011 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, I was told that Paul gave $tern more money then the lakers could give
To get the refs out of the Lakers pocket into ours so we are set up to win it all.
hg
Did you mean 25pts total for the series?
Because there is no way Roy will ever score over 25 in one game, that ship has sailed sorry.
This sells Barea way short. The guy has roasted the Blazers
No player on the Mavs outside of Dirk gives me more indigestion than JJB. I’m not sure he ever misses when he plays our boys. He is small, but he’s less of a liability on defense than Terry or Beubois (too lazy to look up spelling). Find a way to get him bottled up!
Bring back the Uncle Cliffy!
I'm in agreement.
It seems like we don’t have a guy capable of guarding him at this end. Still, he will be a liability on D as long as we don’t have Rudy or Patty out there, as everyone else will take him into the post (esp. Dre). I don’t see him playing as many minutes because of this since Dallas does like to play Barea with another small guard in Kidd or Terry.
The cake was a lie.
has roasted being the operative phrase. We posted him up relentlessly during the last game and he ended up being the roastee instead of the roaster. This will be the smartest group of Blazers in the playoffs in quite some time…and I like to think that counts for something
\\oo///
by Billy Hoyle on Apr 15, 2011 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Not even this year
for the 4 games this year he has averaged 9.25 ppg and 2.7 apg. I am not that scared
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 15, 2011 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions
which is basically his seasonal average
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 15, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I looked up the numbers....
…..and I am surprised that people are worried about JJ Berea……this is what he has averaged against us the last 3 years
7.8ppg and 2.6apg…..big whup.
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 15, 2011 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Dirk has only fouled out of two playoff games: In 2001 against Utah (loss) and in 2002 against Minny (win)
In both games he was still on the floor for 43 respectively 47 minutes. In 15 more playoff games he collected 5 fouls. He only fouled out in 21 regular season games in total in a 10+ years career. The last time in 2008, and before that was a 3 year break.
he doesn't play defense
there, I said it
scrappy
by Honka Playboy on Apr 15, 2011 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol
Would have been fun watching Dirk/Chandler vs LMA/Oden. I’d be calling a sweep right now with that match-up.
If we had Oden
We sould be laughing at the Grizzlies
\oo///
by Billy Hoyle on Apr 15, 2011 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
haha...reply backfire
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
Depends
He’s a pretty great defensive rebounder. Currently #23 all time just short behind Bird, ahead of guys like Camby or Ben Wallace. And doesn’t reach in a lot, if he can’t do anything he just lets it go in and plays on at the other end. In steals he’s also about on Camby’s level. And in blocks, well, not much to write home about, but at least about on a level with Chandler and Haywood (and Yao with his far fewer games). It’s clearly not his strong suit, but he might be underrated for it. At least he doesn’t hurt his team there by doing something stupid all the time.
That is why I am in favor of starting Wallace and Batum in this series
It gives him noone to sneak off onto on defense
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 15, 2011 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I think one big advantage the Blazers have vs the Mavs over just about playing any of the other teams: They can hide Roy on D
Dallas doesn’t have the big guards or even terribly physical forwards, so Nate should usually be able to put him on less lethal guys like Barea/Stevenson/Brewer/to some extent Terry as needed and still benefit from his scoring on offense. Just don’t try him too much on Kidd/Beaubois/Marion/Peja where he would have to close out quickly on outside shooters respectively defend aggressive drives – which he never did great and at the moment just can’t. Applies similarly to Rudy and Wesley should he have one of his not so stellar defensive nights.
I don't understand the statement Roy's a liability on defense
From the games I’ve seen, Roy’s done a very good job on defense. Examples: Defense on ty Lawson towards the end of the Denver game. Defense on Kobe during the game in LA (even though he made that last shot.) Plus, Roy’s telling everyone he’s 100% physically. Why would he lie about that when he can use that as an excuse later if he doesn’t do well? I think Roy’s going to be fine defensively.
Focus on how far he's away from the man he's supposed to guard, drifting way off the perimeter and into the paint
He did that before the surgery this year a ton, and still does. One on one he can still cover players in bursts, but he just doesn’t stay with his man anymore consistently. Always exerted less effort on that end, then it really got to him with the injuries. And if you are separated that far from your man, it’s much easier to switch you onto a player you really can’t cover.
Ugh. I hate to say it, but you're right.
That really bothers me when he ends up guarding a wing parked in the corner and he shades all the way into the key. I know he’s not the only player that does that, but it kills me every time. No way he gets back to his man. It’s stuff like that that gets us killed on pointers all the time.
this is a help defense issue
and apparently it has at least had a mild positive effect on team defense
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions
It's Roy's job to play help defense IN the paint, or someone else is supposed to help him out when he sags off?
I couldn't tell you if the Blazers are simply better at hiding Roy than some of the other players
but I can tell you that Roy’s defense is generally underrated – and there is no arguing that team performance was better with Roy on the court vs. off (defensive and offensive).
However, it is also clear that with whom Roy was on the court also made a big difference. Roy’s top unit (mpg) was with with Miller, Batum, LMA and Camby – Portland was worse defensively (but still had a very nice +/- due to offensive production). The next five units all outperformed the Blazer team rating for points per 100 possessions. After that, the bottom 4 (of Roy’s top ten units) were terrible defensively in limited minutes.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Roy's been a major liability on defense since his return
even if he has risen to the occassion during isolated plays, our team defense takes a hit with him out there. As far as his status physically, 100% for him now does not mean the same thing as 100% for him 2 years ago did. I think it just means he feels as good as he can feel going into this series.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Roy actually hasn't been a major liability on defense
he has had his bad moments like all our wings – but if he was a major liability, opposing teams would score more when he takes the court – and we have quantitative evidence that this does not happen.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Apr 15, 2011 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Geez blacknoise, here you go citing "numbers" and so-called "statistics" again
I guess I’m just going by the eyeball test…that Roy’s reduced propensity for lateral movement has had a negative overall effect on our team defense by resulting in more switches and less effective help/rotations, but I’m glad to hear that isn’t the case. Roy can give us a huge boost with solid performances in this series. Thanks for straightening me out on that. Sorry Sabasdaman, I was mistaken in my disagreement with you.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
All I am going to say that we wouldn't have to worry about hiding Roy if Roy can play even mildly bad D at this juncture.
All I know is that we put him on opposing team’s worst offensive wing and even then, Roy is usually nowhere near the guy when that guy has the ball. Even though I tend to advocate use of advanced stats, defense (esp. individual D) is hard to quantify as a stat and I rely on the eye ball heavier than other facets, like offensive efficiency.
But then, I think this is all in moot since Roy on offense have been rather negligible as of late. Still, it seems like it’s been more of a mental issue as late, as in his mind telling him “oh wait, I better not make that move because of my knees” rather than physical limitation.
The cake was a lie.
I don't think he is thinking of his knees
I think he is taking his role seriously ….in that he setting up his team mates to the exclusion of his own offensive game
Me: "I heard the BCS just bought March Madness.......the vote should be out tomorrow and we will see Duke and Kansas in the championship game"
by 92wastheyear on Apr 15, 2011 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Someone might have already mentioned this, but on Simmons’ podcast yesterday, he was talking about how the Blazers have all of the top players in the series. He said that Dirk was the best overall, then Aldridge, but then the next 3 or 4 in line would all be Blazers. He specifically referenced Wallace, then Miller, then Batum and Matthews. So, we basically have 5 of the best 6 players in the matchup. It was pretty cool to hear the team getting some love.
"Nicolas! You're the strongest boy in the world!"
by ericking on Apr 15, 2011 9:47 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
yeah, I certainly feel that way,
though clearly with Blazer colored glasses on. The Mavs have a frustrating history, but I am afraid (for them) that they missed their window. They have some great talent, but the curse of ageing is brutally relentless. We’ll see.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
this
yeah baby
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
Dirk is a huge key no doubt
I think making him work defensively is gonna be huge. I also think the small lineup we use is gonna be a big factor. I’m usually not a big fan of the smaller lineup particularly against bigger, physical players like Ibaka but I think against Dallas it would be huge. If we can draw Chandler and Dirk to the perimeter against LMA and GW/Nic then we’d have the chance to invert our offense and get our guards in the post. Half court production is has to be there. We saw it some last time they played and I think we need to see a heavy dose of it if we wish to advance. We have to get some kind of production from Roy, and I think easy buckets in the post is the way to go. If we try to get him going on the perimeter or off the dribble, or we fail to get him going at all then its gonna be a long series.
Could you imagine Miller posting up on Barea?
If that constantly happened, then we’d win guarranteed.
Also, if i think we should try playing Mills on Kidd. His speed should give Mills an advantage.
we gonna win this one
we’ve got some playoff experience, don’t like the taste of losing.
I think Roy can and will ‘turn it on’ for parts of the series. I have a feeling we’ll see a couple 15+ point games from him, and maybe a few great games from Rudy.
#7
by collectiveshane on Apr 15, 2011 10:32 AM PDT reply actions
I am hoping this is an option for him,
“Damn the knees (torpedos), full speed ahead!”
If the knees can’t take it, time for medical retirement.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
Who's going to be Dallas's Jason Richardson?
You know, the guy we knew could play well, but for some reason Portland brings out his best and makes him look unstoppable.
hopefully not terry
but DAL is a lot more half-court oriented than PHX last year. the suns running and gunning so much was part of the reason why we lost so badly in a few of those games last year.
PHILLY!
hopefully not Stevenson either
I don’t want the Dirk show supplemented by someone just sniping from deep
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
My money would be on Roddy B.
If he’s on and Carlisle actually plays him this time, he could be the kind of quick athletic guard the Blazers have trouble covering.
Or, well, whichever shooter gets hot from 3 since the Blazers are poor at covering spot-up 3s in general and Dallas has a lot of guys who can make them.
I think he sprained or twisted something
Maybe an ankle. Not sure if it will hold him out or, if so, for how long.
i think we should go small
start nic, and force dirk to matchup defensively against nic or g-dub rather than hide against camby
PHILLY!
It's not a bad thought since the one weakness in that lineup, defensive rebounding, isn't much of an issue vs. Dallas.
The problem now becomes who is going to score off the bench if Nic is moved to the starting lineup? Roy, Rudy, and Mills all have been less than capable on the offense as of late. Not like Camby will help in that area except in offensive rebounding.
The cake was a lie.
we cant affort to start the series sluggish
like we often do after 2+ days of break
I don't agree....
I guess I’m in a minority that doesn’t see Nowitzki as the key to the series. But let me explain. Dirk is “always” key to Dallas from the POV that he is their best player, so I think you can always say he is key to Dallas’s ultimate success. They aren’t going very far if Dirk doesn’t show up…
But I put Dirk in “almost” the same competitive category as a Kobe Bryant, I see Dirk as the player that you want to wear out, you want to make him earn everything he get’s, BUT I’d expect him to get it….and on one level I wouldn’t worry about it. If Dirk get’s 30 sweat drenched, hard earned points? Then I’m fine with that. I want Dirk tired at the end of games, I want him wearing out as the series progresses…but I only see a problem if DIrk is getting his points easily.
I think we can beat Dallas, with Dirk playing well, maybe even great, but the key is “How” he is playing great. You never want to give “free range” to any opposing teams star….BUT I see the KEY to the series as being more about how everyone else, stops everyone else….
I think it’s going to be bench vs. bench….I think keys will be the production of lack of production of players like Kidd or Fernandez and Brandon….
Prediction is always tricky, but I could really see games unfolding where primaries like Dirk for Dallas and Aldridge for Portland…get theirs…and of course are impacting the game..BUT the key..the difference being…everyone else…
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
I tend to agree
and I like what we’re bringing to the table with guys 2 through whatever more than Dallas.
Wallace-Batum-Miller-Matthews-Camby-Roy-Rudy are in my opinion superior to Kidd-Terry-Marion-Chandler-Haywood-Stevenson-Barea-Beaubois. Marion doesn’t cancel out Wallace in my opinion…I’ll take Dre over Kidd, I’ll take Batum/Matthews/Roy/Rudy over Terry/Stevenson/Barea/Beaubois. That just leaves Camby v Chandler/Haywood, and I think that will take care of itself depending on which team can impose their style of play on the other.
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
by sammymohawk on Apr 15, 2011 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Agree and disagree
I do think Dirk is the key, but I also noticed how the Blazers took him out of his rhythm the last couple games by throwing four different defenders at him. It’s got to be hard for the whole team to adjust when they see a different look every possession, whether it’s Camby, Aldridge, Wallace or Batum checking Dirk.
No ones being overly optomistic
So i’ll be… Blazers in 4!
by Ansible on Apr 15, 2011 1:18 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Blazers in three
Roy Bashing~ "Blakes gone...Brandon is next alphabetically " ;-}
by Hermistonmelons on Apr 15, 2011 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
At times we are frustrated with our team 'overlooking' lesser teams,
but now, every game is critical and against a strong opponent. It will be so interesting to see if they can focus and bring their best game under these conditions. I really expect our veterans to step it up, and the rest of the guys to follow their lead. Could be really good.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
Rockets fan
I’ll be cheering for you guys
All right, later dudes. S you in your A’s, don’t wear a C, and J all over your B’s.
by hornedfrogrocket on Apr 15, 2011 2:47 PM PDT reply actions
Thanks, hornedfrog!
I think you’ll find a lot of affection here for the Rockets, too, except when we’re playing you.
After all the analysis...
let’s remember this season is dedicated to #20: let’s win this series for “the enforcer” and his family. It would be a fitting tribute.
I'm astounded by people who want to "know" the universe when it"s hard enough to find your way around Chinatown."
Woody Allen
by prajna on Apr 15, 2011 3:20 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Coaching staff
There’s a key people aren’t talking about much. It’s not just Nate anymore. I think Bernie, Buck, and Bob have had a very positive influence on this team.
by davebball on Apr 15, 2011 3:36 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Dirk is going to put on a show
If we can keep him under 30 most games and limit the damage the other guys do while our defense is trying to cover Dirk I would consider that a victory. Letting the other guys go off while every Blazer starts Dirk watching would be an epic fail for the Blazers and the series probably wouldn’t get past 5 games.
my focus could be the 3 pt's from my boy Brian "bobby-C" Cardinal.
the series could be the best first round in the west.
Should be fun
and I agree. This may turn out to be the best first round match-up in the west. OKC/Denver shows some promise. There are a couple decent first round match-ups in the EC as well.

by 

































