Game 72 Preview: Spurs versus Blazers
Game Time 7:00 p.m. TV: KGW
Ahhhh...Hell Week begins. Well, Hell Fortnight really. The Blazers stretch schedule is plenty tough. This is like a final exam before the playoffs, gauging where the Blazers are and how serious they are about the run they're going to make (or not) in the post-season.
A small sigh of relief might be in order early, however. What looked like a killer exam just switched to the pass-fail grading system as the totally awesome San Antonio Spurs come into town without their heart, soul, and much of their height in the form of the injured Tim Duncan. Don't get me wrong. The Spurs are amazing and fully capable of beating the Blazers without Duncan. The Blazers are also capable of beating the Spurs even with Tim on board. But San Antonio working on a short (in more ways than one) front line can only be to the Blazers' good, especially with Portland's "big" man corps working so effectively lately.
Duncan's absence means it's hard to handicap the game based on normal stats. The Spurs aren't normal when he's not there. Their offense is guard-centered nowadays and probably won't be affected nearly as much as the defense. Duncan isn't quick anymore but he's still got great instincts and pristine fundamentals on the defensive end. DeJuan Blair, Antonio McDyess, and Tiago Splitter don't carry the same weight. A particular challenge for the Spurs will be watching LaMarcus Aldridge. Blair doesn't have height, McDyess doesn't have range, and Splitter doesn't have the flight time to guard the New LMA. The Spurs will likely have to commit extra men to the task, meaning that Portland's other players get a free pass. The Blazers' passing has been sterling the last few games. They have the knack of finding the open man. If Gerald Wallace can drive and Wesley Matthews, Rudy Fernandez, and Nicolas Batum hit any open shots they could make San Antonio look ridiculous. The only real mistake the Blazers could make would be abandoning the things that have made them look good recently. The Spurs can still rebound so one-on-one, contested shots are a no-no. Just make them prove they can handle LaMarcus and let the offense flow from there.
The Blazers also have reason to be confident on the other end. Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili are a handful and San Antonio gets the best out of their supporting cast. But Batum and Matthews were built for situations just such as this. Parker and Ginobili will no doubt score but as long as they have to work for it, the Blazers should prosper. There are a couple big no-no's. First, don't allow Parker to get in the open court. Good shots and smart offense are the best preventative to any fast-break attack San Antonio might think about throwing. But if Portland's guards do shoot deep they better not watch the ball. Parker on the run is one of the few ways the Spurs can find crucial extra points. Offensive rebounding would be a second. Blair, McDyess, and Splitter can all be nightmares on the offensive glass. The Blazers always have to rebound well to prosper but especially against San Antonio with one of their legs missing. A third crucial spot is the arc. San Antonio can murder you from distance. If the Blazers have trouble containing Parker or Ginobili and have to squeeze in on them somebody better recover because everybody who's not a power forward--and even one of their power forwards--can hit the three. This is not the game to get lazy. The other place I can see the Spurs gaining ground is the bench but Portland's rotation is so tight now that there might not be time. Still the group of Roy, Fernandez, Mills, and Camby sometimes have wretched offensive nights collectively. The game would be easier if at least a couple of them scored.
The Blazers win against San Antonio when they make the Spurs look slow. A little ball movement, a lot of energy, and some determination on the boards are the signs of victory tonight.
There's another back-and-forth with Pounding The Rock coming up tomorrow. In it I encapsulated the game thusly: The Spurs' average level of play is higher than the Blazers but especially without Duncan the Spurs are unlikely to exceed that average. Given the situation Portland is capable of outplaying or under-playing in this game. It'll be interesting to see which Blazers squad shows up. It's now or never to leave your imprint on this season.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
first
Sorry, had to…..now ill go read the thing i guess
by lcmonkey05 on Mar 24, 2011 10:43 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Blazers 103 / Spurs 92
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Mar 24, 2011 10:52 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
You can't add a third team.
Either Blazers or Spurs
by JeffePortland on Mar 25, 2011 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm feeling a high scoring game along those lines
Spurs haven’t been as good defensively this year. They’ve been especially poor without Timmy.
I don’t know why, but I’m not concerned about any of these upcoming games. I think we are just as good as all of these teams. Time to lay a beat down on the spurs.
by PortlandPhil on Mar 24, 2011 11:18 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
The next 6 are especially tough
If we can split home/away with SA, OK and Dallas/NO I’d feel really good heading into the last five.
Me too...
I am not worried. We are playing good ball. We tend to rise to the challenge and give ourselves a chance in every game. I’d love to send a message though and blow a really good team out of the water. That could happen tonight, at home, no Duncan…!
#20
IIbdII
With Duncan and West both out, our task is easier
Not easy, but easier. I am going out on the limb and predicting a 10 game streak and losing to GSW the last game. BTW, didn’t we play GSW the last game of last season.
hg
We played....
….. part of the Warriors. That was the game where someone fouled out….and they still played because the Warriors were outta players
Harry Bosch: "Everybody counts....or nobody counts."
by 92wastheyear on Mar 25, 2011 5:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously on of the strangest moments I've ever seen in the NBA...
Draft Nikola Vucevic!
And as I recall Ben saying, they did some sort of weird chant in the locker room
Q: "Why are the Heat losing?"
'Dre: "That's for them to figure out. We did our job."
by Oh. Em. Gee. on Mar 25, 2011 8:32 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Pendy played out of his mind in the first half.
It was a fun game, even w/ a loss, because our seeding was set, like scrubs buffet.
by damonrayhymer on Mar 25, 2011 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions
With Aldridge, we should be able to dictate tempo.
We are at home. They don’t have TD, or any other post player taller than 6-6, which means there’s no reason to pack the paint, but instead make their outstanding 3 pt. shooters put the ball on the floor.
We have guard the perimeter. Slow the pace w/ our half court offense, and make our free throws.
This is a great challenge, one that shouldn’t be all that exciting, but instead, surgical. It’s a great prep class for the playoffs.
Yeah their Front court is still there in size.
They have both Splitter and McDyess. Splitter is alittle bit more known as a defender than a polished offensive player. But not sure beyond that. McDyess is still decent. They aren’t as multifaceted as TD.
Being a Blazer fan is not exactly healthy.
Mc Dyess is a mid-range jump shooter,
who will probably be asked to help contain LMA
by damonrayhymer on Mar 25, 2011 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
The fact that the Spur's have only lost two in a row once this season is a bit scary!
With them losing to Denver the other night means what for us?
BTW, everyone should go read Dave’s exchange with the Spur’s main blogger! It is hilarious!
#20
IIbdII
This means that if the Blazers go inside on offense,
guard the perimeter, and not allow too many lay ups, that number goes to 2.
We should be favored, because we should impose our will, and we should win. It won’t be easy though.
by damonrayhymer on Mar 25, 2011 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
I will be SHOCKED if the Blazers do not win this game...
in particular, who wants/needs this game more ?
The Spurs have 57 wins in the book, they are just on cruise control to the playoffs.
The Blazers NEED to show that they can win, they are looking to move up, they are hungrier.
We need to show some consistency and effectiveness. Time is up for falling apart.
I really think we got this.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
I can't believe that some of the people on the Spurs blog are afraid of the Blazers!!
This is absolutely hilarious to me! Do you know that the Blazer defense gives up a better percentage than the Blazer offense shoots??? The Blazers win games because they do 2 things very well: offensive rebound and force turnovers.
Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
Both of which give us more posessions
Blazers win games because they do 2 things very well: offensive rebound and force turnovers.
Harry Bosch: "Everybody counts....or nobody counts."
by 92wastheyear on Mar 25, 2011 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions
this
as the Mavs so hilariously found out. Blazer math rocks!
Obviously someone needs to make a song of this.
Blazer Math Rocks!
by JeffePortland on Mar 25, 2011 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
I watched some of Spurs-Nuggets and the Spurs' outside shooting is scary
This kind of game reminds me of the Orlando game, except that the Spurs are better without Duncan than the Magic are without Howard. Our small lineup with Wallace at PF should be okay. Our length and athleticism should bother them, but I wonder about Aldridge having to guard Blair.
I hope Nate stressed to his players the need to get out on shooters. The Spurs have some quickness, too, which means we will need to scrap and play good help D when they blow by us. And their bench is probably as good or better than ours for this game.
To win, the Blazers must play up and challenge shooters, get bodies on people rebounding, and work the ball close to the rim.
Now all we need is the rest of the roster to get into "how can everybody help Nicco and Oden" mode. -- Oden Mad, Oden Smash! Sep 29, 2010 7:47 PM
That was an incredible game.
Both those teams look scary.
by JeffePortland on Mar 25, 2011 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Oddsmakers have the blazers favored, if I recall correctly, by 4.5 points.
I’d kind of rather be the underdog, but hopefully their prediction is accurate.
josh selby just flashed the 3 goggles in the kansas game
i don’t know if that’s good or bad but it did just happen
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 25, 2011 4:53 PM PDT reply actions

by 
































