Game 70 Recap: Trail Blazers 80, Lakers 84
For the Latest Updates on the Marcus Camby Ankle Injury: Click Here
The Blazers work hard through most of the game but the opportunism and poise of the Lakers prove too much to overcome when the score ends up close in the fourth period. Defense tells the story on both ends through shooting percentage, rebounding, and in the closing minutes through turnovers as well.
Game Flow
This game started out disastrously for Portland. Behind Pau Gasol, Ron Artest, and eventually Lamar Odom L.A. scored repeatedly in the paint, controlled the glass, and looked like they were on their way to a slow, yet virtually unstoppable, demolishing of their guests. Only a slick effort by Nicolas Batum catching passes and converting saved the Blazers. Granted it wasn't all Batum, as all of his 10 points in the period came off of assists. Portland was milking him intentionally, especially since the Lakers tried to hide Derek Fisher on him, but still it took him playing his mind out to keep Portland close. Nothing else was falling anywhere. Nothing else even looked good. The tide started to turn when Artest--who plays like a sickly lump against most other teams but becomes a terror against Portland--picked up a second foul with 4:15 left. This spurred the Blazers to easier rebounds and interior play. Still the Lakers led 27-20 after one.
The Blazers started the second period slowly behind the I-honestly-never-want-to-see-them-together-again backcourt lineup of Brandon Roy, Rudy Fernandez, and Patty Mills. L.A. pushed the lead to 9 behind two easies at the rim courtesy of unopposed Steve Blake assists. Then Batum re-entered the lineup and the game was on. Not only did Nicolas provide more sweet drives to the cup, he bolstered the defense, allowing the bigs to concentrate on rebounding at both ends. As soon as Portland controlled the boards they controlled the game. They maximized each offensive possession with passing and offensive rebounds. They whipped the ball around so fast that you could watch the Laker defense breaking in real time. Most times when you talk about slow rotations you mean a team is a couple of inches or a foot behind a shot. L.A. rotated so slowly you could actually see them not coming. The Blazers began to erode the lead and eroding turned to full-on erasing once Portland got its own defensive act together in the paint later in the quarter. Portland put a 28-17 hurting on L.A. in the second and walked into the locker room with a 4-point lead, 48-44.
The third period was a fierce, grind-it-out effort. Portland's offense ran through LaMarcus Aldridge's halfcourt sets. Wallace beasted up the boards. The Blazers gave the Lakers liberal doses of zone defense, which L.A. tried to solve by shooting deep. That didn't work for anyone on either side tonight. The Lakers scored but 6 points in the first 8:52 of the period and 4 of those points came from the free throw line. The Blazers weren't great shakes either with their grinding but they managed enough to push the lead to a full 9 during that same span. Sadly the Blazers would turn over the ball a couple times in those final minutes and L.A. would score on dunks or layups for three consecutive possessions. Portland still had a 7-point edge before Matt Barnes heaved a mid-court shot as the buzzer expired, changing 7 to 4 in a heartbeat. Blazers 66-62 entering the closing stanza.
Both teams continued the slow grind entering the fourth. Portland had a couple of huge advantages in Marcus Camby's rebounding and Aldridge's offense. L.A. scored but Portland answered and had the lead to 6 with six minutes remaining. That's when the night started to crumble. Portland weathered an odd turnover or two by Andre Miller, which would eventually get him pulled with 2:20 left. Then Marcus Camby's ankle gave out trying to rebound and he had to leave the game for the final 4 minutes, leaving Portland without its rebounding advantage and interior defense. The Lakers busted layup after layup. The Blazers didn't. Interesting tidbit: after 5:54 remaining in this game the Lakers neither attempted nor scored on a shot farther away than 17 feet from the hoop. The Blazers, on the other hand, attempted only 2 shots closer than 17 feet and didn't hit on either. Close offense beat far away offense (or no offense in the case of turnovers) and the Lakers crawled even, then ahead. Nicolas Batum would hit a last-hope three with 28 seconds left to pull the Blazers within 2 but Derek Fisher sealed it on the next possession with a jumper and Portland bowed, 80-84, after a hard-fought game.
Notable Developments
If I told you Portland's backcourt players--starters and bench--would combine for a 9-40 evening from the field, 2-12 from the arc, draw only 6 foul shots between them, plus Gasol and Odom would go 14-26 and combine for 30 rebounds, plus Portland would shoot 38.6% from the field overall, we all would have predicted a 25-point blowout. That this game was in Portland's grasp late and ended up being decided by 4 was testament to the rebounding, hustle, and defense played by the Blazers plus a little amazing offense from Batum. The Blazers played as a team tonight. That team just broke down at critical junctures, not in cohesion as we've often seen in the past, but through individual errors that are mostly part of the game. This wasn't a bad loss even though it was a tough loss.
Another lesson in this to bank in case the Blazers ever become great: Never go neck and neck with the champs. They're the champs precisely because they beat other teams that don't close out games on them. Leave the door open and a team like L.A. knows how to walk through it without fanfare. They've been there 100 times before. You have to beat the men soundly to be the men. For all of the effort, the Blazers failed to do that tonight.
In the end Portland's offense blew apart Portland's good defense during those critical moments. Not being able to manage anything but TO's and long shots allowed the Lakers to run out and score before the Blazer defense was set. The Blazers were doing quite well defensively throughout but they didn't give themselves a chance to show it late.
Individual Notes
Nicolas Batum had the game of the night with 25 points, 10-16 shooting, 4-9 from distance, plus 4 rebounds, 3 assists, and 2 steals. His most impressive offensive achievement was attacking the rim and finishing effortlessly when he got there. He looked like star material tonight...his ceiling unveiled yet again. Next game? Who knows. One thing that has been impressive about Batum pretty consistently over the last few games has been his standing up in the face of obvious attempts by opponents to rattle him physically. He takes a ton of hard blows by sturdier guys as he's running around the court. He's beginning to show you can't take him out of his game that way.
Gerald Wallace went 4-8 for 9 points, 9 rebounds, and 2 steals. He helped key that second half defense and win the board battle for the Blazers. He also took Ron Artest into a possible-critical technical foul situation with 45 seconds remaining and the Blazers down by 4. He and Artest tangled in the lane and Ron-Ron met somebody as big and tough as he. Artest didn't lit it and threw a couple of forearm shoves into Wallace's face. The whistles blew and the Blazers netted a point. More importantly Wallace was welcomed to the Lakers-Blazers rivalry and instilled a dose of toughness.
LaMarcus Aldridge had 18 points on 8-17 shooting with 6 rebounds. It wasn't classic New Aldridge but L.A., like most teams, was pretty invested in making the Blazers go elsewhere as the game progressed. Despite the double- and triple-downs LMA still got his shots and points.
Marcus Camby made a HUGE difference in this game with 10 rebounds in 26 minutes. More on his ankle as the story develops.
Of the guards Andre Miller likely had the best game with 7 points, 5 assists, and 5 rebounds in 27 minutes. That's kind of like saying the green cherries are the best thing in the fruitcake though. It's still sad that you have to eat it. He shot 3-14 from the field, missed some open opportunities for teammates in the fourth trying to get his own shot, and had the aforementioned turnovers. It wasn't a horrible game for Andre but it wasn't his best by far. Note that he wasn't guarded by a point guard for most of the game. This may have taken him out of the offense even as it let Batum in...a trade the Lakers were evidently willing to make.
Rudy Fernandez also had an impact with 10 points, 5 rebounds, and 3 assists in 28 minutes. At least he scored, albeit from 3-10 shooting overall and 2-7 from the arc. He is the new go-to-guy behind Miller now and is earning plenty of fourth-quarter minutes, even some that once belonged to Andre.
Brandon Roy went 3-12, 0-5 from distance, for 8 points, 2 rebounds, an assist, and a steal in 25 minutes. He wasn't sharp, especially shooting.
Wesley Matthews went an ultra-ugly 0-4, 0-2 from the arc, with 0 points, 2 rebounds, and an assist in 19 minutes. His game was way off tonight.
Stats of the Night
- Blazers 6-25 from distance, 32-83 overall
- Blazers 17 offensive rebounds though
- Blazers 21 assists on 32 made buckets
- Lakers 19 fast break points, 54 points in the paint. In the end the easies killed Portland.
- Kobe Bryant 9-20 for 22 points. He wasn't effective at all despite the scoring...like a shadow of Kobe.
Odd Notes and Links
Silver Screen and Roll will be grateful for this win. Their Game Recap
Jersey Contest Scoreboard and the form for the next game.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
97 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Doesn't make sense
The Blazers started the second period slowly behind the I-honestly-never-want-to-see-them-together-again backcourt lineup of Brandon Roy, Rudy Fernandez, and Nicolas Batum. L.A. pushed the lead to 9 behind two easies at the rim courtesy of unopposed Steve Blake assists. Then Batum re-entered the lineup and the game was on.
How does Batum re-enter the lineup.. when he was supposedly already in this ‘worst ever’ lineup?
#7
by collectiveshane on Mar 20, 2011 10:28 PM PDT reply actions
Sorry, Fixed
My brain was getting ahead of itself. The first Nicolas Batum should have been Patty Mills.
—Dave
fruitcake is the ultimate white elephant
it’s the gift that keeps on being re-gifted
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
Perfectly captures the essence of fruitcake.
Most guys block shots with their fingertips. Wallace was blocking them with his armpit.
by ODEN on a stick on Mar 21, 2011 2:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I thought Matthews was part of the reason
that Kobe shot so poorly for the first three quarters.
by CaptainSexyJacob on Mar 20, 2011 10:52 PM PDT reply actions
some quotes from Gerald.
BlazerFreeman
Gerald Wallace on the minor dust-up between he and Ron Artest:"It was just him being him. I took an early foul and I guess he wanted to …"
BlazerFreeman
Wallace cont: “… keep going through the whistle. It was a scuffle, but I was more trying to block his blows.”
BlazerFreeman
Wallace on Artest: "I guess he had one of his spells."
#52
yeah, he's got the thug thing down pretty good
and he’s a bit guy.
I’d like to see him try that on Oden next year. Even Oden on the floor at the time……
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
Portland can't play zone without Camby
it should be outlawed when he is out….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
I hate the L*kers.
I hate all of the stupid, front-running L*aker fans in Portland too.
I hate most of the L*ker players.
and I hate every jerk-face celebrity in the L*ker crowd.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Mar 20, 2011 11:19 PM PDT reply actions 9 recs
This should go green...
Although I have nothing against the celebrities…if we had celebrities in Portland, they’d be at the game.
#20
IIbdII
I think more celebs show up to see the games when Portland is there, then say the Mavericks or Spurs.
by BRoyInThe4th on Mar 20, 2011 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Well considering the Mavs and the Spurs have more big names, I'm not sure this is necessarily true.
I think most of them just have season tickets.
#20
IIbdII
Actually, considering that the Blazers certainly did not play their best,
it is remarkable that the game was as close as it was. It was frustrating, but at least a “learning experience”.
We are hurtin’ a bit for some mass in the middle for the playoffs. Oden would certainly hit the spot there.
Of course, LA is good at turning it up when they need to. We are improving, still a ways to go.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
Agreed
Not a big deal. Two things changed this game drastically. The crazy Barnes shot at the end of the third and Camby getting hurt. Got to move on and continue to fight for playoff position.
Our guys seems to get real shook up when someone goes down and adding tired legs into the mix couldn’t have helped.
It felt like a playoff game...
slower pace, physical, refs swallowing their whistles. I think we win that game if Camby had not rolled his ankle. He was getting after it. Pretty obvious he wanted it bad.
Roy never looked like he was into it. He had a sweet dish to LA, a nice stepback ovef Barnes, and some good defense on Kobe on one play but Kobe hit the shot anyway. I thought he’d be more up for this one….or just hoping we’d see a little of what we saw against the Mavs…
And yes we need another big in the middle. Wallace really helps in the rebounding but we just don’t see the lineup of Wallace, LA, and Camby together to try and dominate the boards. I like to see those 3 with Miller and Rudy/Roy or maybe even Matthews for even more defense.
#20
IIbdII
I remember in that Laker game in Portland, Brandon reached over Kobe as he went by him, poked the ball away, and they
called a foul on Brandon for getting some wrist.
I thought Andre got fouled on that play tonight at the end. Since they didn’t show the replay I figured good no call. Now Andre is saying he did get fouled. I’d like to see that play again. I really hope it was just a turnover. Either way, Andre should never have been in a position to get it poked away like that.
you can't expect the refs to bail you out
Miller is not K*be and he’s not wearing gold-purple, enough said
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
The refs didn't bail the Lakers out all that much
Total fouls: Lakers 17, Blazers 11.
Free Throws: Lakers 11-12, Blazers 10-15
everyone on this subject points to the end tally
but it’s not the bulk calls that make the favoritism, it’s the one or two late that will always always always go lakers’/kobe’s way. that being said i don’t think that happened in this game.
but like they say in boxing “don’t leave it to the judges.” if you lead by 15 you don’t have to worry about one or two bad calls. 4 points on the lakers is no lead at all.
by extraneous solutions on Mar 21, 2011 2:53 AM PDT up reply actions
this x1000
if you lead by 15 you don’t have to worry about one or two bad calls. 4 points on the lakers is no lead at all.
the L*kers can rachet up the defense, late
and clutch and grab without consequence
but Portland has to know that reality going into the 4th quarter, and learn how to compensate for it
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
yes, like the Blazers did in the previous game against the 6ers
With Portland haviing the lead late in the 4th I was really thinking, bring in our best defensive team.
It was the two LA poke aways for layups that won them the game. We got cautious, we got slow, which gave their D time to work.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
As a UW Husky fan, I've got a few reasons to complain about the officiating today. I, however, don't do it.
Why?
It’s ’cause the referees appeared to have tried their damnedest out there, with the occasional bad call being something that unfortunately happens from time to time.
For me, the times that I get angry and pissed off is when a legitimate screw-job is in the works. The biggest example of that in Pacific Northwest history is Super Bowl XL, with Game 7 of the 1993 Western Conference Finals — where the Phoenix Suns had 64 free-throw attempts against the Seattle SuperSonics — coming in second.
"They say it has no memory. That’s where I want to live the rest of my life. A warm place with no memory."
Brandon Roy had the ball poked away from him in three consecutive possessions InThe4th
Luckily the all went out of bounds, but that did happen.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 7:53 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
again, against a playoff caliber team roy shrinks
love the guy, root for him, feel bad for him. he should finish the games on the bench.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Thought we had it
Up down the stretch. Lost Camby but just didn’t hit shots at the end. Felt a little like a playoff game. I liked a lot of what I saw. Keep working.
by BBlazer on Mar 21, 2011 12:24 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
I appreciate your writing Dave
Do you take notes when you watch the game? How long do your recaps usually take? Does the writing just flow naturally from your brain to your fingertips?
Most guys block shots with their fingertips. Wallace was blocking them with his armpit.
by ODEN on a stick on Mar 21, 2011 2:47 AM PDT reply actions
IMO, at the time, the Lakers is a tad better then Portland
IMO, at the time, the Lakers is a whole lot luckier then Portland.
Was Portland too keyed up? or Was the Lakers lucky that those easy shots wouldn’t fall? or Maybe Portland is just unlucky. I seen lay-ups, easy put-backs, wide open perimeter shots that just wouldn’t go in.
Portland did lose the game, but they did play a good game. What is on Portland side is we have new parts, and we are improving daily as the Lakers are what you see is what you get, which at the time being is good enough but will not get much better with their present cast. Don’t count the Blazers or the Lakers out in the Play-offs. Because we will get better so-as we won’t have to depend on LUCK.
hg
Dead legs
Blazers get a lot of their game from hustle plays which, unfortunately, can take their toll on the second night of a back to back. Lakers needed to put distance between themselves and Dallas. Tired legs would’ve needed the right bounces and calls to get the win against them last night.
Seemed like the Blazers ran through a lot of their gas in the 2nd quarter.
I forgot about the B2B.
That probably was the bottom line, but Camby’s rolled ankle seemed like the turning point.
hg
Yeah agreed
That and I feel Barne’s shot to close the third shifted the momentum a bit. Tired legs need as much inspiration as they can get and every bit of momentum going into the 4th would have helped.
As one of the biggest Miller supporters on this site
I must say, he had a very poor game on the offensive side. He couldn’t hit anything and he turned the ball over a couple times late trying to dribble penetrate. He’s playing his worst ball of the season unfortunately – hopefully age isnt catching up with him.
I wasn’t too impressed with Roy either. with Roy controlling the ball with Rudy in the game, there were a few late desperate shot clock attempts. The best thing for this offense is Miller in the game with Roy playing off the ball but unfortunately Miller played poorly. It happens I guess.
How many times have you seen it
The team looks terrible, then miller comes back in and everything starts to make sense again. It is because he is a point guard. Only miller never came back in because Rudy was playing so well – shooting 3 of 10. Nate needs to quit reading Chad ford articles about how much flexibility the team has and start staying out of the way.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 7:51 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
They pulled Phoenix's defensive playbook out from last year...
They tried to hide the defensive limited Fisher on Batum while Kobe checked Miller. Sorta like the PHX approach with Grant Hill last year in the playoffs. I am sort of surprised we haven’t seen more of it this year. It was effective because we spent more time getting into our sets (if at all) and often the first option was covered with little time for a second or third. Nate sniffed this out quickly and started calling stuff for Batum (especially since Fisher was on him). Regardless, when we can’t go through the progressions and make the defense work a little, it makes it hard to get open shots…. I don’t blame Miller, Kobe is just a good defender.
I agree with you about Roy…he just didn’t look that into it.
#20
IIbdII
Our DEARS in the headlights...........
They toyed with us…….then they threw us in the box and left.
We must endeavor to persevere.
Stupid coach
Wesley Matthews finishes that game on the bench? What has Rudy done to deserve this honor? You play your way into the finishing lineup over time, and you don’t play your way out of it in 3 quarters. Keep your best defender, an the guy who kept Kobe off balance all night out at the end of the game, For Rudy Fernandez, somebody explain that to me. Fernandez in that game at the end instead of Matthews or miller is just stupid.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 7:12 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Simple
Matthews: 0-4, 0 points, no impact on offense.
Rudy: just 3-10, but 10 points, 5 rebs, 4 assists.
Big difference in production there.
#7
by collectiveshane on Mar 21, 2011 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions
matthews was chasing, and smothering kobe all game
except at the end when he went off and beat us.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
and rudy got his 3 - 10 against the laker bench
when he came back in against the starters at the end, he got nothing and looked terrible on both offense, and especially defense, ask derek fisher how easy that shot was he hit.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
In retrospect Wes was not doing much besides playing D
His shot was WAY off tonight. Rudy’s was not.
Blazers fan since '91
REST IN PEACE MAURICE LUCAS 1952-2010 R.I.P #20
"We're family because of this stupid, stinkin' team." - Dave
by rise_stand_resist on Mar 21, 2011 7:34 AM PDT reply actions
He was 0 for 4
And was humiliating Kobe all night. Take Matthews off Kobe and you get the finish we had last night. Can’t believe Nate would dog Matthews like that. Matthews is the apitomy of the guy we need in the game at the end of it, just as much as Aldridge is.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 7:42 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Nobody stops Kobe...
Matthews had no effect on Kobe. Kobe takes a lot of difficult shots against everyone he plays against. Sometimes they drop (especially in big moments it seems), sometimes they don’t (early in games it seems or in games that don’t matter to him). But no defender I’ve every seen has slowed him down at all – including Matthews last night.
Nate was right to put someone in who might score a few buckets. It didn’t work out but it was the right move. Matthews is still completely overmatched offensively against the better players. He’s in year 2 and that may or may not improve but he was an albatross last night.
0-4 and you find yourself out of the finishing lineup
that’s pretty tough when you’ve demonstrated all year that you are the number two option on offense, and the best defender on the team. matthews did stop kobe, all game long, until the end.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
But the personnel we have aren't the one's we've had all year.
An argument can be made that Wesley belongs out there at the end of the game. But that he’s been there all year isn’t the strongest case to make. Of course he’s been finishing the whole year, we’ve only had six healthy bodies the whole year up until now.
But our problem last night wasn’t defense. Even with Roy out there instead of Matthews, the problem was never defense. It was offense. And to be honest, Wesley Matthews is probably the last Blazer I want out there trying to create offense, even on his good nights. As an outlet from a double team? Matthews is money. As someone to grab a pass and finish, wonderful job. But as someone with the ball in his hands, trying to develop a play on his own? It usually ends up cringe worthy. I’d rather have Marcus Camby initiate the offense than Matthews. At least he knows what he can and can’t do.
So I’ve got no problem with Matthews on the bench when a bucket needs to be manufactured. Miller, Roy, Fernandez, Wallace and Aldridge can all make things happen out there. They didn’t last night, and give credit to the Lakers’ defense. That’s why they’re going to be so hard to beat come playoff time.
But no matter if you’ve got the best defense in the world, scoring only six points in the last 5:20 of the game against the Lakers is going to cost you. And it did last night.
"The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason." - G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy, 1909
Blazersedge.com || New to Blazersedge?
Actions -> Rec and Flag. Blazersedge works right when you use these two things.
by T Darkstar on Mar 21, 2011 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
do you think that maybe roy dribblilng the ball around for 20 second intervals then throwing up prayers may have been one cause of the late scoring draught?
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
we weren't watching the same game last night. Get off the Roy hate and maybe you'll see some things you never saw before.
Maybe you’ll stop putting all the blame on Roy and see that there were others who couldn’t score or that others held the ball and waited to pass the ball to Roy when there wans’t much time on the clock. This blaming you do when it’s clearly more than one player is getting old.
#52
Not blaming Roy, if you read my post
Blaming Nate for playing Roy, and Fernandez at the end of the game over miller and Matthews. I’m not trying to hate on Roy. I low the guy, feel terrible for him, root for him, but he’s been hurting the team.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 6:55 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
There is a reason Matthews starts/finishes games, and plays 34 minutes a game – because he is scoring over 16 a game and shooting 3’s at over 40%, and he has hit big shots late in games this year – difference makers when it has counted.
There is a reason Miller starts/finishes games, and plays 33 minutes a game, and gets paid 7 million dollars a year. Because he is averaging 13 points and over 7 assists a game, with a 7 to 2 turnover to assist ratio.
There is also a reason (or at least there was until last night) why Fernandez doesn’t start/finish games, and plays 23 minutes a game (against backups), because he has a 37% FG percentage, and a 2 to 1 turnover to assist ratio, and is much worse than that on the road.
Nothing about that closing lineup made any sense.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions
An inconsistent lineup leads to inconsistent results
A lineup without a point guard, leads to Roy dribbling the ball around for 20 seconds then taking a terrible shot. Rudy over Matthews and miller at the end of that game.. Now I have my arms folded with a stupid look on my face. The lineup at the end of the game should be camby or Wallace, Aldridge, Batum, Matthews, and miller. Period.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 7:35 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
can't hang it on one play
rudy running by fisher leaving him for the wide open go head jumper when all he needed to do was square him up…
Yeah there's a time for gambling in defense
That probably wasn’t the time
gonna take that game as a positive
Integrating Wallace, Camby, and Roy back into the rotation is still a work in progress and its showing promising signs. While I don’t think this years team has a chance to be better than the Lakers, I do think they have a chance to make their first round playoff series interesting.
Agreed
I hate it when we lose a game like last night’s and people start crying about not being elite etc etc.
We had this game and last game against the Lakers. We just needed to finish better. That’s something our guys can learn.
I don't care how bad a game Dre was having
Putting Roy in at the PG spells certain doom. Sure, he’s had a few good games. But he can’t take people off the dribble on a consistent basis anymore, and he doesn’t really create for his teammates. Just when I thought this team had made some progress they revert to the Roy iso ugliness. It seems LMA gies into second fiddle mode when Roy has the ball all the time. Keep Roy on the bench down the stretch and give LMA a chance to be the man. He deserves a shot, he caertainly had proved many of his naysayers (myself included) wrong the last few months.
by lil'stink on Mar 21, 2011 8:19 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
i guess roy "wasn't sharp" at 3 of 12 and 0 for 5, but matthews gets an 'ultra ugly' for going 0 for 4?
and smothering kobe all night.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah. Taking out Dre pretty much killed the game for us.
Not saying we would have won with Dre in, but certainly stood a better chance on offense. I thought he was being punished unfairly for the two turnovers as they should have been fouls.
The cake was a lie.
Yeah Roy isn't going to be able to get the offense in gear
against an elite defense unless he can go into ROY mode. Nate’s still experimenting.
Roy still trying to figure it out
The Cleveland game Roy looked like he was totally coasting – on offense and defense. Like he was scared to put himself at risk in such a blowout game. Unfortunately against Philly he looked kind of the same. Then last night he was not on at all. I think he is trying to “save” himself and turn it on when he deems it really needed. Understandable that it is still a process for him. It is too bad that we have so many wildly inconsistent wings in We$, Batum, Rudy and the current Roy. I love me some We$ but was not the first time he had a really good game offensively and then was nothing the next game.
by LicketyBrindleDowntheMiddle on Mar 21, 2011 8:57 AM PDT reply actions
He didn't guard kobe, though.
That job fell on everyone else besides Roy. In fact, I only remember one possession at the end when Roy got stuck on kobe by default.
As for me, Roy is looking pretty much what I thought he’d be. His defense was never good anyway so lack of meniscus was going to hurt it even more. He wasn’t going to be able to use his best moves going to the rim anymore so it was obvious he needs a period of adjustment to be a consistent offensive player. It’ll most likely take an off-season for him to settle into his new moves.
The cake was a lie.
so don't put him in there as a point guard
makes sense to me
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I think what we saw from Roy over the last week
is what we can expect from him for the foreseeable future. He was magnificent against Dallas, not so much against Cleveland or Philly, and bad last night. Because he no longer can break defenders down the way he used to (and may never again), he becomes a shooter. Shooters are pretty much consistently inconsistent. Roy will have moments that remind us of 2008. It might be a whole game, maybe a quarter, perhaps just the occasional possession, but on the whole, he becomes a role player who will contribute a lot some nights, and very little others.
Unfortunately, the Blazers have to rely on him to be consistent.
better to post him up
he can still lean into guys and hit the fadeaway, i think that’s the best spot for him to get the ball, in the post. or stick him in the corner and let him shoot open ones from there. starting him with the ball up top needs to be addressed.
by heybabydrinkyourmilk on Mar 21, 2011 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions
This wasn't one of those losses to get freaked out about
It would’ve been a nice win but beating the Lakers at Staples after our starters played heavy minutes the night before in a tough game between playoff teams fighting for position…
Were people really banking on this game as a win? I just wanted to see them make LA sweat a little. I wanted to see them competitive against a Lakers team that needed to win. A win would have been an upset here. Move on and beat them down at the RG next game.
Lakers look like a team headed for some rough waters here pretty soon anyway. Clock is ticking for them…
yeah...well the clock is ticking only with regard to Bynum's health this year...and
perhaps Kobe’s body..it’s his 15th season in the NBA! It’s Mller’s 12th season! And Kobe’s game is way more physical than Millers!
So…hopefully Bynum plays like doo doo when he comes to the RG…..where the Blazers get to play the Lakers on a BACK TO BACK AGAIN.
Really Stern?
They'll probably have more than Bynum/Kobe's health to worry about soon enough
Bynum is the youngest guy in their starting 5 and there isn’t a whole lot of youth in their bench either. I’ve watched a few of their games recently and I’m getting that feeling you get when the “check engine” light stays on in the car.
Same for at least 2 more of the Elite teams though the Spurs are probably a little more resilient looking than the Lakers and Celtics. It really could go wrong in a hurry for some of these teams.
Let's hope the guys learn something from this...
Feature this one as a lost playoff game. The refs were letting both teams play, as they do in the playoffs. The rugged Laker defense clearly rattled the Blazers in the last five minutes and the guys resorted to a lot of either one-on-one effort or “not me” bailing rather than bearing down and working the offense harder—harder screens, crispy and more decisive passing and cutting to the basket.
This is something teams with lots of successful playoff experience do, as the Lakers did, and something this team needs to learn to do if they’re ever going to escape the first round.
So basically you're telling me...
That those green things are cherries?! Huh.
"Part of me wants him to beast up the Blazers, but part of me thinks he should move to Hawaii and become a dentist." - Llamaiguana
by llamaiguana on Mar 21, 2011 10:53 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Interesting note from the boxscore:
Gasol went just 6-15 from the field. I don’t recall if Camby was on him all the time when he was out there but we seemed to limit his production fairly well. And it was a great effort from Camby, his best game in a while.
#7
by collectiveshane on Mar 21, 2011 11:02 AM PDT reply actions
The effort was actually quite commendable..
I saw a lot of scrap/hustle, just some bad decisions on offense late in game
#7
by collectiveshane on Mar 21, 2011 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I thought the turning point came late in the 4th
when Nic passed the ball directly to Fisher (I think it was) for a breakaway lay-in. That began a series of turnovers, including Kobe’s “non-foul” of ‘Dre, that led to L*ker scores and the eventual loss. The Blazers got sloppy on O and it cost them the game. Of course, that ridiculous baseline fadeway from almost behind the backboard with a defender draped all over him that Kobe hit didn’t help but without the Blazer turnovers that shot woudn’t have mattered.
"Send lawyers, guns and money; the sh*t has hit the fan." - Warren Zevon
Wallace needs a green light
Gerald Wallace needs to be encouraged to drive and shoot first, pass second. Batum needs to learn from what he sees Wallace do. They both had good drives, then passed up open shots. Wallace is hesitating out of deference to his new teammates, and Batum hesitates out of timidity. We all know Wallace can do it. Batum needs to be pushed to believe in himself. He had some sweet reverse and double-pump lay-ins, and he could do that all the time. Driving to the hole and shooting actually collapses the defense and if others crash the o-boards they can get the rebound if the shots miss. It’s ok to miss if your buddies can clean the glass.
Miller had a subpar game. Remember, though, that he had just flown in from LA barely in time for Philly, due to a family matter, then he was back in LA the very next day. I wonder if he was drained and distracted by that.
Fair enough, but..
Miller had a subpar game. Remember, though, that he had just flown in from LA barely in time for Philly, due to a family matter, then he was back in LA the very next day. I wonder if he was drained and distracted by that.
If he was drained and distracted, he shouldn’t have gone out and put up 14 shots for just 7 points.
#7
by collectiveshane on Mar 21, 2011 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
no excuses
In defending Andre, I’m just saying that he doesn’t deserve all the blame. He played about the same minutes, and took only a few more shots as BRoy and Rudy. A lot of time he gets stuck with the “hot potato” because other “better” shooters are to timid to shoot. Batum took 16, he could’ve taken 25; Wallace took only 8; Aldridge took only 17; and Mathews took only 4.
The blazers as a team just need to get over the intimidation factor and take it to the elite teams. They have the talent, its the drive and passion they lack.
I think you have a good point,
Though I probably wouldnt call it “drive and passion”, more confidence in roles and familiarity. Sometimes being cautious/courteous is the way to lose. A missed shot shure beats a timidity turnover or desperation last second heave. But Gerald is just getting adjusted, at least he is a starter now :-). Also Camby is so big with all his rebounds, including offensive ones. We need him. LA is good at transition off misses, a critical skill. We need that too.
Jordan's not a bad guy.. he gave us Gerald Wallace.
Sometimes I wonder if Dre's jumpers come as motivation
He’s thinking, “Man, none of these fools aren’t even trying to get open…and they KNOW my jumper is right up there with a 13 year-old’s. I guess I’ll just shoot this ridiculous turn-around fade-away 17-footer and hope they realize they don’t want more of that next time.”
Both teams continued the slow grind entering the fourth.
So, basically what you’re trying to say is that both teams played hard?
I think he's referring to the pace of the game.
Lots of defense slow down game.
by JeffePortland on Mar 21, 2011 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
































