Game 66 Preview: Trail Blazers versus Hawks
Game Time: 4:00 p.m. TV: CSNNW
The Trail Blazers played the Atlanta Hawks two weeks ago in Portland, an 83-90 loss in which the Blazers couldn't manage to hold onto the ball or rebound, two of their season-long strengths. Atlanta's length, speed, and tenacity took the Blazers completely out of their game. That was also Gerald Wallace's first night of active play with the Blazers, a limp beginning to an arc which has ascended since. The Blazers have done well since that night, posting a 4-2 record. The Hawks have gone the other way, losing 5 of 6 including three on their home floor. The common denominator in almost every loss has been the scoring prowess of the opposition. We're talking Knicks, Thunder, Lakers here...three teams at different levels but with uniformly potent offenses. The one loss to a defensive team came to the Bulls, probably the best defensive team in the league right now.
This tips Portland's hand tonight. They'll have to do a couple of basic things they didn't do in Portland...the ones we just mentioned. They need to prevent Atlanta from collecting the ball off of the glass and running, as that's one of the few ways they put up points. Ditto for not turning the ball over, giving up run-outs. The Blazers can deal with Joe Johnson scoring a bunch as long as they don't let his teammates waltz to easy points. But the other end of the floor is where this game will be won or lost. Atlanta's not the most intimidating defensive team in the league but they're physical and rangy and they don't back down. Portland will have to be much more than timid and compliant to take this game. Settling for long, forced jumpers is a sure sign of doom. Missing wide open jumpers, allowing those long, powerful Atlanta defenders to crush any penetration with ease, is another. The Blazers need to be smart and competent hitting their jumpers then use that pressure to open up the middle. They need to be in a 48-minute, all-out fight to claim rebounds on both ends, taking control away from the Hawks and generating a few extra points in the process. Marcus Camby hitting even a couple of shots from the top of the key to draw Al Horford out of the middle would work wonders. LaMarcus Aldridge cannot be intimidated or outplayed by Josh Smith. On defense the Blazers need to understand who they're guarding in each instance. Most of the Hawks will pass the ball but when somebody goes to score it that somebody is going to attack in a specific, and in most cases limited, manner. Don't double-team stupidly. Play guys for the shot or the drive depending on their strengths. For all of Portland's defensive acumen this is where they fall apart many nights. If you're playing Kirk Hinrich to penetrate your defense is already ineffective. You know what Horford and Jamal Crawford are going to do when they touch the ball. Most of the time you know what Johnson and Smith are going to do too. You have to counter their athleticism with smarts.
This team is beatable. They just give the Blazers a devil of a time. Remember the loss in Portland. Heck, remember the loss last night. Then just go and bludgeon them with Aldridge and Wallace and whoever else shows a hot hand. Score 100 and the game is your oyster. Score 75 and there's probably no way to win it. Let's see how much heart and effort the Blazers put forth when the chips are (once again) down.
Peachtree Hoops is your ATL hookup.
Here's your Jersey Contest game form, Just give the only answer possible for the glitched-up third question. Those who heed these instructions will gain an automatic 10 points. Those who don't will go without.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We need to take care of business.
Just play our game and win or lose we will be OK. Start playing cautious or playing not to be embarassed and we may not fare so well. Otherwise. we have nothing to lose or to be ashamed of, just go out and do it.
hg
I think maybe we need to look at starting Wallace in this game. Then there can really be no excuse for Camby to shoot that elbow jumper.
if they take Aldridge out of the play, they are going to have to deal with G3. Batum is playing decent right now, but Wallace is on another level attacking the hoop. No more slow starts.
If Aldridge doesn't roll off a pick, today - I might have a conniption fit
I don’t know how many times I saw him simply float after setting a high pick, rather than cut hard to the hoop. And Charlotte was doubling the ball handler constantly. The middle was so wide open for ANYONE to cut – I just about had a conniption last night.
Of course, if Andre takes a three with the first shot or Camby a driving no look reverse layup with the second – I might spontaneously combust.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
I agree with this...
….and unfortunately it spread to the entire team. The whole Blazer team acted like the rim was radioactive and getting too close to it was a danger….
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
During the game I kept pretending that Brandon had two wooden peg legs.
and that made it possible to be quite proud that he was managing outside jumpshots through such adversity.
unnecessary, prejudicial and misleading
Or so Perry Mason might characterize your comment. But seriously, what is the point of singling out Roy when it took a team effort to ruin yesterday’s game?
Besides – that was Roy scoring on the fast break, posting up and driving in that same game – ‘peg leg’ and all….
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Mar 12, 2011 11:44 AM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Just the facts ma'am.
Brandon looked like his knees were all locked up, even when he was standing still. It was painful to watch. I posted my literal thoughts from my observations in response to someones point that the team had an aversion to rim proximity. There’s a logical connection between the tow. As far as singling him out… I don’t remember him driving to the hole even once.
When he’s in the game, he’s gonna end up touching the ball more often than not, and I feel he contributed more than his share to the team’s poor shot selection. I think it’s likely that he settled for some of those outside shots to avoid knee pain. We need somebody on the court who can recognize when something isn’t working and point a finger at players who take bad shots.
Criminy. We just ‘beat miami’ and ‘LOST TO CHARLOTTE’.
Roy actually set a screen for Mills, then scored on the pick-and-pop
the proverbial shoe is on the other foot re: Roy’s Blazer career
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
these thoughts could use some work - literally
I posted my literal thoughts from my observations in response to someones point that the team had an aversion to rim proximity.
Roy took 11 shots for the game and only hit 4 – so he didn’t have a good shooting night. However, “rim aversion” was a team problem – not a Roy problem – so singling out one player speaks to an opportunity to attack a player rather than critique the team.
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Mar 12, 2011 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
Commenting on one player is not singling him out.
Why do you keep saying that? The whole team stunk but I don’t have time to write a book about it.
My opinion is that Roy looked like he was playing on peg legs. I suspect there is a hidden reason that you are taking this so personally. I edited my original comment before I posted it to be less offensive to people with prosthetic legs or disabilities. If that’s what the real problem is, then say so.
Yea. Those plays were really bad omens.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Mar 12, 2011 10:24 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
no more games with 300 jumpers!!!!
LET'S PLAY SOME DAMN DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!
by Batum Shakalaka on Mar 12, 2011 10:22 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Please get LMA 20 good shots.
You can’t lose this game if that happens.
wha??
by Hipster Olympic Team! on Mar 12, 2011 10:23 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Or at least one within the first couple minutes
No one in the world can beat me at RBI baseball 3(nes).
Is last night's nightmare over yet?
"If I had a dime for every basket I made today, you'd still suck!" - from the book 'John Dies @ the End'
I'm afraid to sleep
for fear that it would come back to haunt me
I'll tell you after the first two minutes of this game
No one in the world can beat me at RBI baseball 3(nes).
I win tonight would make for a successful 3-1 road trip….plus it would help wash the bad taste from last nights loss quite nicely.
by Jam Master Jay on Mar 12, 2011 12:46 PM PST reply actions
Give us some momentum for dallas on tuesday
I’m glad we get to play every team ahead of us twice. See what our new look roster will matchup. I like our matchup against the mavs now. Chandler can’t guard aldridge and no way dirk has a chance to guard gw
No one in the world can beat me at RBI baseball 3(nes).
it's ironic
the Blazers lost the one game on this road trip that I thought they had the best chance to win
so if form holds, tonight should be a W for the inverted 1-3
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
If we continue beating all the tougher teams and
losing to all the crappy teams we’re in good shape lol
I know this is a pregame thread
but I’m still bummed about yesterday. I lost $50 because Wes missed that first free throw that would have sent the game to OT. I can no longer call Wes – Wes Money, that is, when he loses me money.lol
"It's probably a twelve-day. He needs two days to wake up." - MJ on a ten-day contract teammate
by NorthWest Connection on Mar 12, 2011 1:06 PM PST reply actions
You bet money on Matthews' 1st free throw?
He regularly clanks the 1st because he rushes it. Whenever he goes to the line, I think, take your time, Wes, and every time he spits it up immediately. So frustrating.
Bummer about the Grant.
Stealth > Wealth
If he'd just count two seconds he'd make those
Too bad. Guys probably would have put in a little more effort in overtime…like the Denver game.
Mathews' propensity to rush that first free throw is getting irritating
Law of Logical Argument
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
by blacknoiseNW on Mar 12, 2011 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
he's like Chi Chi Rodriguez rushing his putts
if anyone (besides Les Nesbin) remembers back that far
When reached 40 years of following Portland basketball you have, be as passionate of the Trail Blazers you will not!
No,
I bet it on the game spread. Or the second half spread of Portland winning by atleased 3 to be exact. I was assuming that if he made them both we would get a stop on the defensive end with 5 seconds left and go to OT. Then once again I was assuming that we would win in OT by at leased 3. I thought this was reasonable considering we are a way better team than the Charlotte Bobcats and in OT our true colors would finally shine. So I guess it’s not all Wes’ fault but it did happen at the most climactic moment so therefore as someone betting on the game it was all his fault. No worries though just 2 tickets to the next home game theoretically. Go Wes and the Blazers!
"It's probably a twelve-day. He needs two days to wake up." - MJ on a ten-day contract teammate
by NorthWest Connection on Mar 12, 2011 6:03 PM PST up reply actions
Anyone here going to be at this game?
"Every time I make one, it always feels like the first time," Roy said. "I was just so excited and so blessed to make a shot like that. It never gets old, it always feels like the first time. I was excited and the fans cheering, teammates jumping up and down."
yep
flying to ATL right now, should be there by halftime.
"It's probably a twelve-day. He needs two days to wake up." - MJ on a ten-day contract teammate
by NorthWest Connection on Mar 12, 2011 1:09 PM PST reply actions
I kind of feel like
the Blaze HAVE to win this game to keep our general swagger. That is, to keep all the respect we’ve earned around the league (shall I say re-earned) in the last month or two, mostly since the aquisition of Wallace.
Also, we just lost to Atlanta, actually got completely beat in all facets AT home. Shot 39%FG, 19% from deep and out rebounded 49 to 34. We need to improve in those categories in order to win this game, obviously.
And we’re coming off a pathetic 5 point loss the Bobcats to end our well documented 7 game road win streak.
LMA and Wallace need to step up tonight.
"It's probably a twelve-day. He needs two days to wake up." - MJ on a ten-day contract teammate
by NorthWest Connection on Mar 12, 2011 1:31 PM PST reply actions
I miss LMA 2.0
Seems like the word is out to be as rough as possible with him inside and it’s affecting him badly. It was nice while it lasted.
I'd like to take this moment to thank video games.
During yesterday’s game, I had the XBox running. During timeouts (or just really bad play), I’d hit the old TV/Video button and get back to killing demons. It really is amazing how much better I felt about some of those plays after I had a chance to splatter the earth with darkspawn blood. TOs? Missed 3pters? Whatever, I just killed another ogre.
Still, no matter how many hemlocks I killed, they still lost to Charlotte when Charlotte’s best player was wearing a Blazer jersey. That’s hard to shake.
Stealth > Wealth
Rudy needs another 10 pounds on his frame so he can finish stronger. Ginobili is about 10-15 pounds heavier.
Rudy misses too many lay ups after getting fouled.

by 



































